Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy: Effective and Efficient End-to-End Patient-Specific Quality Assurance
To explore an effective and efficient end-to-end patient-specific quality-assurance (QA) protocol for volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) and to evaluate the suitability of a stationary radiotherapy QA device (two-dimensional [2D] ion chamber array) for VMAT QA. Three methods were used to a...
Saved in:
| Published in | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics Vol. 82; no. 5; pp. 1567 - 1574 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
New York, NY
Elsevier Inc
01.04.2012
Elsevier |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0360-3016 1879-355X 1879-355X |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018 |
Cover
| Abstract | To explore an effective and efficient end-to-end patient-specific quality-assurance (QA) protocol for volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) and to evaluate the suitability of a stationary radiotherapy QA device (two-dimensional [2D] ion chamber array) for VMAT QA.
Three methods were used to analyze 39 VMAT treatment plans for brain, spine, and prostate: ion chamber (one-dimensional absolute, n = 39), film (2D relative, coronal/sagittal, n = 8), and 2D ion chamber array (ICA, 2D absolute, coronal/sagittal, n = 39) measurements. All measurements were compared with the treatment planning system dose calculation either via gamma analysis (3%, 3- to 4-mm distance-to-agreement criteria) or absolute point dose comparison. The film and ion chamber results were similarly compared with the ICA measurements.
Absolute point dose measurements agreed well with treatment planning system computed doses (ion chamber: median deviation, 1.2%, range, −0.6% to 3.3%; ICA: median deviation, 0.6%, range, −1.8% to 2.9%). The relative 2D dose measurements also showed good agreement with computed doses (>93% of pixels in all films passing gamma, >90% of pixels in all ICA measurements passing gamma). The ICA relative dose results were highly similar to those of film (>90% of pixels passing gamma). The coronal and sagittal ICA measurements were statistically indistinguishable by the paired t test with a hypothesized mean difference of 0.1%. The ion chamber and ICA absolute dose measurements showed a similar trend but had disparities of 2-3% in 18% of plans.
After validating the new VMAT implementation with ion chamber, film, and ICA, we were able to maintain an effective yet efficient patient-specific VMAT QA protocol by reducing from five (ion chamber, film, and ICA) to two measurements (ion chamber and single ICA) per plan. The ICA (Matrixx®, IBA Dosimetry) was validated for VMAT QA, but ion chamber measurements are recommended for absolute dose comparison until future developments correct the ICA angular dependence. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | To explore an effective and efficient end-to-end patient-specific quality-assurance (QA) protocol for volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) and to evaluate the suitability of a stationary radiotherapy QA device (two-dimensional [2D] ion chamber array) for VMAT QA.PURPOSETo explore an effective and efficient end-to-end patient-specific quality-assurance (QA) protocol for volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) and to evaluate the suitability of a stationary radiotherapy QA device (two-dimensional [2D] ion chamber array) for VMAT QA.Three methods were used to analyze 39 VMAT treatment plans for brain, spine, and prostate: ion chamber (one-dimensional absolute, n = 39), film (2D relative, coronal/sagittal, n = 8), and 2D ion chamber array (ICA, 2D absolute, coronal/sagittal, n = 39) measurements. All measurements were compared with the treatment planning system dose calculation either via gamma analysis (3%, 3- to 4-mm distance-to-agreement criteria) or absolute point dose comparison. The film and ion chamber results were similarly compared with the ICA measurements.METHODS AND MATERIALSThree methods were used to analyze 39 VMAT treatment plans for brain, spine, and prostate: ion chamber (one-dimensional absolute, n = 39), film (2D relative, coronal/sagittal, n = 8), and 2D ion chamber array (ICA, 2D absolute, coronal/sagittal, n = 39) measurements. All measurements were compared with the treatment planning system dose calculation either via gamma analysis (3%, 3- to 4-mm distance-to-agreement criteria) or absolute point dose comparison. The film and ion chamber results were similarly compared with the ICA measurements.Absolute point dose measurements agreed well with treatment planning system computed doses (ion chamber: median deviation, 1.2%, range, -0.6% to 3.3%; ICA: median deviation, 0.6%, range, -1.8% to 2.9%). The relative 2D dose measurements also showed good agreement with computed doses (>93% of pixels in all films passing gamma, >90% of pixels in all ICA measurements passing gamma). The ICA relative dose results were highly similar to those of film (>90% of pixels passing gamma). The coronal and sagittal ICA measurements were statistically indistinguishable by the paired t test with a hypothesized mean difference of 0.1%. The ion chamber and ICA absolute dose measurements showed a similar trend but had disparities of 2-3% in 18% of plans.RESULTSAbsolute point dose measurements agreed well with treatment planning system computed doses (ion chamber: median deviation, 1.2%, range, -0.6% to 3.3%; ICA: median deviation, 0.6%, range, -1.8% to 2.9%). The relative 2D dose measurements also showed good agreement with computed doses (>93% of pixels in all films passing gamma, >90% of pixels in all ICA measurements passing gamma). The ICA relative dose results were highly similar to those of film (>90% of pixels passing gamma). The coronal and sagittal ICA measurements were statistically indistinguishable by the paired t test with a hypothesized mean difference of 0.1%. The ion chamber and ICA absolute dose measurements showed a similar trend but had disparities of 2-3% in 18% of plans.After validating the new VMAT implementation with ion chamber, film, and ICA, we were able to maintain an effective yet efficient patient-specific VMAT QA protocol by reducing from five (ion chamber, film, and ICA) to two measurements (ion chamber and single ICA) per plan. The ICA (Matrixx®, IBA Dosimetry) was validated for VMAT QA, but ion chamber measurements are recommended for absolute dose comparison until future developments correct the ICA angular dependence.CONCLUSIONSAfter validating the new VMAT implementation with ion chamber, film, and ICA, we were able to maintain an effective yet efficient patient-specific VMAT QA protocol by reducing from five (ion chamber, film, and ICA) to two measurements (ion chamber and single ICA) per plan. The ICA (Matrixx®, IBA Dosimetry) was validated for VMAT QA, but ion chamber measurements are recommended for absolute dose comparison until future developments correct the ICA angular dependence. To explore an effective and efficient end-to-end patient-specific quality-assurance (QA) protocol for volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) and to evaluate the suitability of a stationary radiotherapy QA device (two-dimensional [2D] ion chamber array) for VMAT QA. Three methods were used to analyze 39 VMAT treatment plans for brain, spine, and prostate: ion chamber (one-dimensional absolute, n = 39), film (2D relative, coronal/sagittal, n = 8), and 2D ion chamber array (ICA, 2D absolute, coronal/sagittal, n = 39) measurements. All measurements were compared with the treatment planning system dose calculation either via gamma analysis (3%, 3- to 4-mm distance-to-agreement criteria) or absolute point dose comparison. The film and ion chamber results were similarly compared with the ICA measurements. Absolute point dose measurements agreed well with treatment planning system computed doses (ion chamber: median deviation, 1.2%, range, −0.6% to 3.3%; ICA: median deviation, 0.6%, range, −1.8% to 2.9%). The relative 2D dose measurements also showed good agreement with computed doses (>93% of pixels in all films passing gamma, >90% of pixels in all ICA measurements passing gamma). The ICA relative dose results were highly similar to those of film (>90% of pixels passing gamma). The coronal and sagittal ICA measurements were statistically indistinguishable by the paired t test with a hypothesized mean difference of 0.1%. The ion chamber and ICA absolute dose measurements showed a similar trend but had disparities of 2-3% in 18% of plans. After validating the new VMAT implementation with ion chamber, film, and ICA, we were able to maintain an effective yet efficient patient-specific VMAT QA protocol by reducing from five (ion chamber, film, and ICA) to two measurements (ion chamber and single ICA) per plan. The ICA (Matrixx®, IBA Dosimetry) was validated for VMAT QA, but ion chamber measurements are recommended for absolute dose comparison until future developments correct the ICA angular dependence. Purpose To explore an effective and efficient end-to-end patient-specific quality-assurance (QA) protocol for volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) and to evaluate the suitability of a stationary radiotherapy QA device (two-dimensional [2D] ion chamber array) for VMAT QA. Methods and Materials Three methods were used to analyze 39 VMAT treatment plans for brain, spine, and prostate: ion chamber (one-dimensional absolute, n = 39), film (2D relative, coronal/sagittal, n = 8), and 2D ion chamber array (ICA, 2D absolute, coronal/sagittal, n = 39) measurements. All measurements were compared with the treatment planning system dose calculation either via gamma analysis (3%, 3- to 4-mm distance-to-agreement criteria) or absolute point dose comparison. The film and ion chamber results were similarly compared with the ICA measurements. Results Absolute point dose measurements agreed well with treatment planning system computed doses (ion chamber: median deviation, 1.2%, range, −0.6% to 3.3%; ICA: median deviation, 0.6%, range, −1.8% to 2.9%). The relative 2D dose measurements also showed good agreement with computed doses (>93% of pixels in all films passing gamma, >90% of pixels in all ICA measurements passing gamma). The ICA relative dose results were highly similar to those of film (>90% of pixels passing gamma). The coronal and sagittal ICA measurements were statistically indistinguishable by the paired t test with a hypothesized mean difference of 0.1%. The ion chamber and ICA absolute dose measurements showed a similar trend but had disparities of 2-3% in 18% of plans. Conclusions After validating the new VMAT implementation with ion chamber, film, and ICA, we were able to maintain an effective yet efficient patient-specific VMAT QA protocol by reducing from five (ion chamber, film, and ICA) to two measurements (ion chamber and single ICA) per plan. The ICA (Matrixx®, IBA Dosimetry) was validated for VMAT QA, but ion chamber measurements are recommended for absolute dose comparison until future developments correct the ICA angular dependence. Purpose: To explore an effective and efficient end-to-end patient-specific quality-assurance (QA) protocol for volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) and to evaluate the suitability of a stationary radiotherapy QA device (two-dimensional [2D] ion chamber array) for VMAT QA. Methods and Materials: Three methods were used to analyze 39 VMAT treatment plans for brain, spine, and prostate: ion chamber (one-dimensional absolute, n = 39), film (2D relative, coronal/sagittal, n = 8), and 2D ion chamber array (ICA, 2D absolute, coronal/sagittal, n = 39) measurements. All measurements were compared with the treatment planning system dose calculation either via gamma analysis (3%, 3- to 4-mm distance-to-agreement criteria) or absolute point dose comparison. The film and ion chamber results were similarly compared with the ICA measurements. Results: Absolute point dose measurements agreed well with treatment planning system computed doses (ion chamber: median deviation, 1.2%, range, -0.6% to 3.3%; ICA: median deviation, 0.6%, range, -1.8% to 2.9%). The relative 2D dose measurements also showed good agreement with computed doses (>93% of pixels in all films passing gamma, >90% of pixels in all ICA measurements passing gamma). The ICA relative dose results were highly similar to those of film (>90% of pixels passing gamma). The coronal and sagittal ICA measurements were statistically indistinguishable by the paired t test with a hypothesized mean difference of 0.1%. The ion chamber and ICA absolute dose measurements showed a similar trend but had disparities of 2-3% in 18% of plans. Conclusions: After validating the new VMAT implementation with ion chamber, film, and ICA, we were able to maintain an effective yet efficient patient-specific VMAT QA protocol by reducing from five (ion chamber, film, and ICA) to two measurements (ion chamber and single ICA) per plan. The ICA (Matrixx Registered-Sign , IBA Dosimetry) was validated for VMAT QA, but ion chamber measurements are recommended for absolute dose comparison until future developments correct the ICA angular dependence. To explore an effective and efficient end-to-end patient-specific quality-assurance (QA) protocol for volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) and to evaluate the suitability of a stationary radiotherapy QA device (two-dimensional [2D] ion chamber array) for VMAT QA. Three methods were used to analyze 39 VMAT treatment plans for brain, spine, and prostate: ion chamber (one-dimensional absolute, n = 39), film (2D relative, coronal/sagittal, n = 8), and 2D ion chamber array (ICA, 2D absolute, coronal/sagittal, n = 39) measurements. All measurements were compared with the treatment planning system dose calculation either via gamma analysis (3%, 3- to 4-mm distance-to-agreement criteria) or absolute point dose comparison. The film and ion chamber results were similarly compared with the ICA measurements. Absolute point dose measurements agreed well with treatment planning system computed doses (ion chamber: median deviation, 1.2%, range, -0.6% to 3.3%; ICA: median deviation, 0.6%, range, -1.8% to 2.9%). The relative 2D dose measurements also showed good agreement with computed doses (>93% of pixels in all films passing gamma, >90% of pixels in all ICA measurements passing gamma). The ICA relative dose results were highly similar to those of film (>90% of pixels passing gamma). The coronal and sagittal ICA measurements were statistically indistinguishable by the paired t test with a hypothesized mean difference of 0.1%. The ion chamber and ICA absolute dose measurements showed a similar trend but had disparities of 2-3% in 18% of plans. After validating the new VMAT implementation with ion chamber, film, and ICA, we were able to maintain an effective yet efficient patient-specific VMAT QA protocol by reducing from five (ion chamber, film, and ICA) to two measurements (ion chamber and single ICA) per plan. The ICA (Matrixx®, IBA Dosimetry) was validated for VMAT QA, but ion chamber measurements are recommended for absolute dose comparison until future developments correct the ICA angular dependence. |
| Author | Wu, Q. Jackie Das, Shiva Yin, Fang-Fang O’Daniel, Jennifer |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jennifer surname: O’Daniel fullname: O’Daniel, Jennifer email: jennifer.odaniel@duke.edu – sequence: 2 givenname: Shiva surname: Das fullname: Das, Shiva – sequence: 3 givenname: Q. Jackie surname: Wu fullname: Wu, Q. Jackie – sequence: 4 givenname: Fang-Fang surname: Yin fullname: Yin, Fang-Fang |
| BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25768427$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21470797$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.osti.gov/biblio/22056199$$D View this record in Osti.gov |
| BookMark | eNqVkm1rFDEQx4NU7LX6DUQWRHy1Z5J9yG4R4SjXKlRUWsV3IZvM2qx7yZpkC_ftTdhTQZAiBCYPv5kw__-coCNjDSD0lOA1waR-Naz14Gw3rSkmZI3Tah6gFWlYmxdV9fUIrXBR47yI8DE68X7AOJKsfISOKSkZZi1boW9f7DjvIDgt8_dWzaMIoLKNk9nNLTgx7c-ybd-DDPoOMmFUOmmpwYRsa1QebB5D9lGEdJVfTyB1fM8-zWLUYZ9tvJ-dMBIeo4e9GD08OcRT9Plie3P-Nr_6cPnufHOVy4qykJOqlKzoW6UK1paNILRUVBIsCTRYdKBwI1gdd42kZd_FR1J0dV32tKa4ILQ4Rc-XutYHzb3UAeSttMbEFjiluKpJ20bq5UJNzv6YwQe-017COAoDdva8pW2Fa4ZJJJ8dyLnbgeKT0zvh9vyXghF4cQCEl2LsU7fa_-EqVjclTVy5cNJZ7x30vxGCeTKUD3wxlCdDOU6riWlnf6XFlqLa1gQn9Hhf8pslGaLidxpcEgSiG0q7pIey-n8LyFEbHfv8Dnvwg52diW5ywj3lmF-ngUvzRkgctbLFscDrfxe4__-fUADljg |
| CODEN | IOBPD3 |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_meddos_2013_02_008 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4816384 crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_16150 crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_ab8955 crossref_primary_10_1120_jacmp_v15i5_4838 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_meddos_2012_10_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejmp_2019_02_007 crossref_primary_10_1002_acm2_14106 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_canrad_2014_06_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apradiso_2024_111340 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jrras_2022_01_002 crossref_primary_10_4236_ijmpcero_2013_21003 crossref_primary_10_1002_acm2_13221 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejmp_2015_08_011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejmp_2020_12_014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radphyschem_2025_112543 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejmp_2013_05_004 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4824433 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejmp_2014_01_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2013_03_010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_meddos_2018_02_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2014_09_008 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4762682 crossref_primary_10_1002_acm2_13405 crossref_primary_10_1088_2057_1976_aad577 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4749965 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radphyschem_2024_111836 crossref_primary_10_1120_jacmp_v13i5_3856 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejmp_2018_04_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radonc_2014_01_024 crossref_primary_10_1120_jacmp_v15i5_4843 crossref_primary_10_1088_2057_1976_aa5196 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4729738 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2015_07_2271 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_meddos_2018_04_004 crossref_primary_10_1259_bjr_20140577 crossref_primary_10_1120_jacmp_v15i6_4994 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02735-9 10.1118/1.597316 10.1016/j.meddos.2003.09.003 10.1088/0031-9155/52/4/023 10.1118/1.598248 10.1016/j.clon.2009.01.014 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.005 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00663-1 10.1118/1.1591194 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1677 10.1088/0031-9155/40/9/004 10.1002/ijc.1039 10.1088/0031-9155/45/8/309 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.06.013 10.1080/02841860802287116 10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02777-3 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.06.253 10.1118/1.3213085 10.1080/02841860802266748 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.016 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.12.008 10.1118/1.2818738 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.12.008 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.055 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.07.021 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.05.060 10.1088/0031-9155/53/19/N01 10.1118/1.3238104 10.1120/jacmp.v8i3.2448 10.1080/02841860802657227 10.1118/1.3190392 10.1088/0031-9155/50/19/017 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.013 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2012 Elsevier Inc. Elsevier Inc. 2015 INIST-CNRS Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2012 Elsevier Inc. – notice: Elsevier Inc. – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 OTOTI |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic OSTI.GOV |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1879-355X |
| EndPage | 1574 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 22056199 21470797 25768427 10_1016_j_ijrobp_2011_01_018 S0360301611001490 1_s2_0_S0360301611001490 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- --K .1- .FO 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1RT 1~5 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5RE 5VS 7-5 AAEDT AAEDW AAQFI AAQQT AAWTL AAXUO ABJNI ABLJU ABNEU ABOCM ABUDA ACGFS ACIUM ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADVLN AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AHHHB AIGII AITUG AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ BELOY DU5 EBS EFKBS EJD F5P FDB GBLVA HED HMO HZ~ IHE J1W KOM LX3 M41 MO0 O9- OC~ OO- RNS ROL RPZ SDG SEL SES SSZ UV1 XH2 Z5R ~S- .55 .GJ 29J AALRI AAQXK ABEFU ABWVN ACRPL ADMUD ADNMO ADPAM AFCTW AFFNX AFJKZ AGRDE ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN EFJIC FEDTE FGOYB FIRID G-2 HMK HVGLF HX~ NQ- R2- RIG SAE SEW UDS X7M XPP ZGI AAIAV AGZHU ALXNB ZA5 AAYWO AAYXX AGQPQ CITATION AGCQF IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 ABPTK OTOTI |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c527t-154c73f9dd37948a124d2c10c1e80abed08a760ab8c24fb4d213b664f26203123 |
| ISSN | 0360-3016 1879-355X |
| IngestDate | Fri May 19 00:34:47 EDT 2023 Sat Sep 27 20:31:41 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:06:38 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:17:22 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:57:09 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 03:16:31 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:25:24 EST 2024 Sun Feb 23 10:18:54 EST 2025 Tue Oct 14 19:35:51 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 5 |
| Keywords | Quality assurance Ion chamber array Intensity-modulated arc therapy Volumetric modulated arc therapy RapidArc Human Conformal radiotherapy Intensity modulated radiotherapy Radiobiology Cancerology Treatment Efficiency Dosimetry |
| Language | English |
| License | https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 CC BY 4.0 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
| LinkModel | OpenURL |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c527t-154c73f9dd37948a124d2c10c1e80abed08a760ab8c24fb4d213b664f26203123 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| PMID | 21470797 |
| PQID | 929506701 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 8 |
| ParticipantIDs | osti_scitechconnect_22056199 proquest_miscellaneous_929506701 pubmed_primary_21470797 pascalfrancis_primary_25768427 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2011_01_018 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2011_01_018 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2011_01_018 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0360301611001490 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2011_01_018 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2012-04-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2012-04-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2012 text: 2012-04-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | New York, NY |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York, NY – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys |
| PublicationYear | 2012 |
| Publisher | Elsevier Inc Elsevier |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc – name: Elsevier |
| References | Wong, Chen, Greenland (bib28) 2002; 53 Cotrutz, Kappas, Webb (bib10) 2000; 45 Korreman, Medin, Kjaer-Kristoffersen (bib31) 2009; 48 Ezzell, Burmeister, Dogan (bib5) 2009; 36 Klein, Hanley, Bayouth (bib6) 2009; 36 Bogdanich, Rebelo (bib8) 2001; December 28 Wong, D’Souza, Chen (bib11) 2005; 61 Foglitata, Clivio, Nicolini (bib21) 2008; 89 Bedford, Warrington (bib15) 2009; 73 Duthoy, De Gersem, Vergote (bib29) 2004; 60 Galvin, Ezzell, Eisbrauch (bib3) 2004; 58 Vanetti, Clivio, Nicolini (bib24) 2009; 92 Yu, Li, Ma (bib12) 2002; 53 Beauman, Gete, Chen (bib17) 2004; 29 Yu (bib9) 1995; 40 Kutcher, Coia, Gillin (bib1) 1994; 21 Nelms, Simon (bib36) 2007; 8 Ma, Yu, Earl (bib16) 2001; 96 Shaffer, Nichol, Vollans (bib22) 2010; 76 Duthoy, De Gersem, Vergote (bib27) 2003; 57 Otto (bib13) 2008; 35 Low, Harms, Mutic (bib35) 1998; 25 Kjaer-Kristofferson, Ohlhues, Medin (bib18) 2009; 48 ASTRO/ACR Practice guideline for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). 2007. Collaboration of the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO). Online at Cozzi, Dinshaw, Shrivastava (bib25) 2008; 89 Bush, Townson, Zavgorodni (bib32) 2008; 53 Yoo, Wu, Lee (bib20) 2010; 76 Wolfsberger, Wagar, Nitsch (bib37) 2010; 11 Johansen, Cozzi, Olsen (bib26) 2009; 48 Schreibmann, Dhabaan, Elder (bib30) 2009; 36 Ezzell, Galvin, Low (bib2) 2003; 30 Bogdanich (bib7) 2010; January 23 . Shaffer, Morris, Moiseenko (bib19) 2009; 21 Wu, Yoo, Kirkpatrick (bib23) 2009; 75 Herzen, Todorovic, Cremers (bib34) 2007; 52 Ling, Zhang, Archambault (bib14) 2008; 72 Stasi, Giordanengo, Cirio (bib33) 2005; 50 Vanetti (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib24) 2009; 92 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib4 Ezzell (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib2) 2003; 30 Stasi (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib33) 2005; 50 Shaffer (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib22) 2010; 76 Cotrutz (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib10) 2000; 45 Klein (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib6) 2009; 36 Bedford (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib15) 2009; 73 Korreman (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib31) 2009; 48 Ezzell (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib5) 2009; 36 Low (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib35) 1998; 25 Ling (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib14) 2008; 72 Foglitata (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib21) 2008; 89 Wu (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib23) 2009; 75 Cozzi (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib25) 2008; 89 Yu (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib12) 2002; 53 Johansen (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib26) 2009; 48 Otto (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib13) 2008; 35 Schreibmann (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib30) 2009; 36 Wolfsberger (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib37) 2010; 11 Shaffer (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib19) 2009; 21 Bush (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib32) 2008; 53 Bogdanich (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib8) 2001 Duthoy (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib29) 2004; 60 Yoo (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib20) 2010; 76 Nelms (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib36) 2007; 8 Bogdanich (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib7) 2010 Herzen (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib34) 2007; 52 Beauman (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib17) 2004; 29 Wong (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib11) 2005; 61 Kutcher (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib1) 1994; 21 Ma (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib16) 2001; 96 Yu (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib9) 1995; 40 Galvin (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib3) 2004; 58 Kjaer-Kristofferson (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib18) 2009; 48 Wong (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib28) 2002; 53 Duthoy (10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib27) 2003; 57 |
| References_xml | – volume: 48 start-page: 227 year: 2009 end-page: 232 ident: bib18 article-title: RapidArc volumetric modulated therapy planning for prostate cancer patients publication-title: Acta Oncol – volume: 76 start-page: 935 year: 2010 end-page: 942 ident: bib20 article-title: Radiotherapy treatment plans with RapidArc for prostate cancer involving seminal vesicles and lymph nodes publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys – volume: 75 start-page: 1596 year: 2009 end-page: 1604 ident: bib23 article-title: Volumetric arc intensity-modulated therapy for spine body radiotherapy: Comparison with static intensity-modulated treatment publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys – year: 2001; December 28 ident: bib8 article-title: A pinpoint beam strays invisibly, harming instead of healing publication-title: New York Times – volume: 89 start-page: 180 year: 2008 end-page: 191 ident: bib25 article-title: A treatment planning study comparing volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and fixed field IMRT for cervix uteri radiotherapy publication-title: Radiother Oncol – volume: 21 start-page: 581 year: 1994 end-page: 618 ident: bib1 article-title: Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: Report of Task Group No.40 Radiation Therapy Committee publication-title: Med Phys – volume: 96 start-page: 379 year: 2001 end-page: 384 ident: bib16 article-title: Optimized intensity-modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer treatment publication-title: Int J Cancer – volume: 52 start-page: 1197 year: 2007 end-page: 1208 ident: bib34 article-title: Dosimetric evaluation of a 2D pixel ionization chamber for implementation in clinical routine publication-title: Phys Med Biol – volume: 73 start-page: 537 year: 2009 end-page: 545 ident: bib15 article-title: Commissioning of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys – volume: 61 start-page: 830 year: 2005 end-page: 841 ident: bib11 article-title: Intensity-modulated arc therapy for treatment of high-risk endometrial malignancies publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys – volume: 21 start-page: 401 year: 2009 end-page: 407 ident: bib19 article-title: Volumetric modulated arc therapy and conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy for simultaneous maximal intraprostatic boost: A planning comparison study publication-title: Clin Oncol – volume: 76 start-page: 1177 year: 2010 end-page: 1184 ident: bib22 article-title: A comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy for frontal and temporal high-grade gliomas publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys – volume: 36 start-page: 4530 year: 2009 end-page: 4535 ident: bib30 article-title: Patient-specific quality assurance for VMAT treatment delivery publication-title: Med Phys – volume: 92 start-page: 111 year: 2009 end-page: 117 ident: bib24 article-title: Volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for carcinomas of the oro-pharynx, hypo-pharynx, and larynx: A treatment planning comparison with fixed field IMRT publication-title: Radiother Oncol – volume: 29 start-page: 18 year: 2004 end-page: 25 ident: bib17 article-title: Simplified intensity-modulated arc therapy for dose escalated prostate cancer radiotherapy publication-title: Med Dosim – volume: 45 start-page: 2185 year: 2000 end-page: 2206 ident: bib10 article-title: Intensity modulated arc therapy (IMAT) with centrally blocked rotational fields publication-title: Phys Med Biol – reference: ASTRO/ACR Practice guideline for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). 2007. Collaboration of the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO). Online at: – volume: 58 start-page: 1616 year: 2004 end-page: 1634 ident: bib3 article-title: Implementing IMRT in clinical practice: A joint document of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys – volume: 89 start-page: 254 year: 2008 end-page: 262 ident: bib21 article-title: Intensity modulation with photons for benign intracranial tumors: A planning comparison of volumetric single arc, helical arc, and fixed gantry techniques publication-title: Radiother Oncol – volume: 36 start-page: 5359 year: 2009 end-page: 5373 ident: bib5 article-title: IMRT commissioning: Multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparison, a report from AAPM Task Group 119 publication-title: Med Phys – volume: 60 start-page: 794 year: 2004 end-page: 806 ident: bib29 article-title: Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) for rectal cancer publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys – year: 2010; January 23 ident: bib7 article-title: Radiation offers new cures, and ways to do harm publication-title: New York Times – volume: 53 start-page: 222 year: 2002 end-page: 235 ident: bib28 article-title: Intensity-modulated arc therapy simplified publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys – volume: 11 start-page: 3057 year: 2010 ident: bib37 article-title: Angular dose dependence of the Matrixx TM and its calibration publication-title: J App Clin Med Phys – volume: 48 start-page: 185 year: 2009 end-page: 191 ident: bib31 article-title: Dosimetric verification of RapidArc treatment delivery publication-title: Acta Oncol – reference: . – volume: 50 start-page: 4681 year: 2005 end-page: 4694 ident: bib33 article-title: D-IMRT verification with a 2D pixel ionization chamber: Dosimetric and clinical results in head and neck cancer publication-title: Phys Med Biol – volume: 53 start-page: N359 year: 2008 end-page: N370 ident: bib32 article-title: Monte Carlo simulation of RapidArc radiotherapy delivery publication-title: Phys Med Biol – volume: 40 start-page: 1435 year: 1995 end-page: 1449 ident: bib9 article-title: Intensity-modulated arc therapy with dynamic multileaf collimation: An alternative to tomotherapy publication-title: Phys Med Biol – volume: 30 start-page: 2089 year: 2003 end-page: 2115 ident: bib2 article-title: Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: Report of the IMRT subcommittee of the AAPM radiation therapy committee publication-title: Med Phys – volume: 72 start-page: 575 year: 2008 end-page: 581 ident: bib14 article-title: Commissioning and quality assurance of RapidArc radiotherapy delivery system publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys – volume: 8 start-page: 2448 year: 2007 ident: bib36 article-title: A survey on planar IMRT QA analysis publication-title: J Appl Clin Med Phys – volume: 25 start-page: 656 year: 1998 end-page: 661 ident: bib35 article-title: A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions publication-title: Med Phys – volume: 53 start-page: 453 year: 2002 end-page: 463 ident: bib12 article-title: Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys – volume: 57 start-page: 1019 year: 2003 end-page: 1032 ident: bib27 article-title: Whole abdominopelvic radiotherapy (WAPRT) using intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT): First clinical experience publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys – volume: 35 start-page: 310 year: 2008 end-page: 317 ident: bib13 article-title: Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc publication-title: Med Phys – volume: 48 start-page: 495 year: 2009 end-page: 503 ident: bib26 article-title: A planning comparison of dose patterns in organs at risk and predicted risk for radiation induced malignancy in the contralateral breast following radiation therapy of primary breast using conventional, IMRT, and volumetric modulated arc treatment techniques publication-title: Acta Oncol – volume: 36 start-page: 4197 year: 2009 end-page: 4212 ident: bib6 article-title: Task Group 142 report: Quality assurance for medical accelerators publication-title: Med Phys – ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib4 – volume: 53 start-page: 222 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib28 article-title: Intensity-modulated arc therapy simplified publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02735-9 – volume: 21 start-page: 581 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib1 article-title: Comprehensive QA for radiation oncology: Report of Task Group No.40 Radiation Therapy Committee publication-title: Med Phys doi: 10.1118/1.597316 – volume: 29 start-page: 18 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib17 article-title: Simplified intensity-modulated arc therapy for dose escalated prostate cancer radiotherapy publication-title: Med Dosim doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2003.09.003 – volume: 52 start-page: 1197 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib34 article-title: Dosimetric evaluation of a 2D pixel ionization chamber for implementation in clinical routine publication-title: Phys Med Biol doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/4/023 – volume: 25 start-page: 656 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib35 article-title: A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions publication-title: Med Phys doi: 10.1118/1.598248 – volume: 21 start-page: 401 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib19 article-title: Volumetric modulated arc therapy and conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy for simultaneous maximal intraprostatic boost: A planning comparison study publication-title: Clin Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2009.01.014 – volume: 75 start-page: 1596 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib23 article-title: Volumetric arc intensity-modulated therapy for spine body radiotherapy: Comparison with static intensity-modulated treatment publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.005 – volume: 57 start-page: 1019 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib27 article-title: Whole abdominopelvic radiotherapy (WAPRT) using intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT): First clinical experience publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00663-1 – volume: 30 start-page: 2089 year: 2003 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib2 article-title: Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: Report of the IMRT subcommittee of the AAPM radiation therapy committee publication-title: Med Phys doi: 10.1118/1.1591194 – volume: 76 start-page: 935 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib20 article-title: Radiotherapy treatment plans with RapidArc for prostate cancer involving seminal vesicles and lymph nodes publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1677 – volume: 40 start-page: 1435 year: 1995 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib9 article-title: Intensity-modulated arc therapy with dynamic multileaf collimation: An alternative to tomotherapy publication-title: Phys Med Biol doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/40/9/004 – volume: 96 start-page: 379 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib16 article-title: Optimized intensity-modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer treatment publication-title: Int J Cancer doi: 10.1002/ijc.1039 – volume: 45 start-page: 2185 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib10 article-title: Intensity modulated arc therapy (IMAT) with centrally blocked rotational fields publication-title: Phys Med Biol doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/45/8/309 – volume: 89 start-page: 180 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib25 article-title: A treatment planning study comparing volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and fixed field IMRT for cervix uteri radiotherapy publication-title: Radiother Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.06.013 – volume: 48 start-page: 185 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib31 article-title: Dosimetric verification of RapidArc treatment delivery publication-title: Acta Oncol doi: 10.1080/02841860802287116 – volume: 53 start-page: 453 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib12 article-title: Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02777-3 – volume: 61 start-page: 830 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib11 article-title: Intensity-modulated arc therapy for treatment of high-risk endometrial malignancies publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.06.253 – volume: 36 start-page: 4530 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib30 article-title: Patient-specific quality assurance for VMAT treatment delivery publication-title: Med Phys doi: 10.1118/1.3213085 – volume: 48 start-page: 227 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib18 article-title: RapidArc volumetric modulated therapy planning for prostate cancer patients publication-title: Acta Oncol doi: 10.1080/02841860802266748 – volume: 60 start-page: 794 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib29 article-title: Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) for rectal cancer publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.04.016 – volume: 58 start-page: 1616 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib3 article-title: Implementing IMRT in clinical practice: A joint document of the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.12.008 – volume: 35 start-page: 310 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib13 article-title: Volumetric modulated arc therapy: IMRT in a single gantry arc publication-title: Med Phys doi: 10.1118/1.2818738 – volume: 92 start-page: 111 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib24 article-title: Volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for carcinomas of the oro-pharynx, hypo-pharynx, and larynx: A treatment planning comparison with fixed field IMRT publication-title: Radiother Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.12.008 – volume: 73 start-page: 537 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib15 article-title: Commissioning of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.055 – volume: 11 start-page: 3057 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib37 article-title: Angular dose dependence of the Matrixx TM and its calibration publication-title: J App Clin Med Phys – volume: 89 start-page: 254 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib21 article-title: Intensity modulation with photons for benign intracranial tumors: A planning comparison of volumetric single arc, helical arc, and fixed gantry techniques publication-title: Radiother Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2008.07.021 – volume: 72 start-page: 575 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib14 article-title: Commissioning and quality assurance of RapidArc radiotherapy delivery system publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.05.060 – volume: 53 start-page: N359 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib32 article-title: Monte Carlo simulation of RapidArc radiotherapy delivery publication-title: Phys Med Biol doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/19/N01 – volume: 36 start-page: 5359 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib5 article-title: IMRT commissioning: Multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparison, a report from AAPM Task Group 119 publication-title: Med Phys doi: 10.1118/1.3238104 – year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib8 article-title: A pinpoint beam strays invisibly, harming instead of healing publication-title: New York Times – volume: 8 start-page: 2448 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib36 article-title: A survey on planar IMRT QA analysis publication-title: J Appl Clin Med Phys doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v8i3.2448 – volume: 48 start-page: 495 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib26 publication-title: Acta Oncol doi: 10.1080/02841860802657227 – volume: 36 start-page: 4197 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib6 article-title: Task Group 142 report: Quality assurance for medical accelerators publication-title: Med Phys doi: 10.1118/1.3190392 – volume: 50 start-page: 4681 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib33 article-title: D-IMRT verification with a 2D pixel ionization chamber: Dosimetric and clinical results in head and neck cancer publication-title: Phys Med Biol doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/19/017 – volume: 76 start-page: 1177 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib22 article-title: A comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy for frontal and temporal high-grade gliomas publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.013 – year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018_bib7 article-title: Radiation offers new cures, and ways to do harm publication-title: New York Times |
| SSID | ssj0001174 |
| Score | 2.2268343 |
| Snippet | To explore an effective and efficient end-to-end patient-specific quality-assurance (QA) protocol for volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) and to... Purpose To explore an effective and efficient end-to-end patient-specific quality-assurance (QA) protocol for volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) and... Purpose: To explore an effective and efficient end-to-end patient-specific quality-assurance (QA) protocol for volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) and... |
| SourceID | osti proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref elsevier |
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 1567 |
| SubjectTerms | Algorithms Biological and medical sciences BRAIN Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy DOSIMETRY Film Dosimetry - standards Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Intensity-modulated arc therapy Ion chamber array IONIZATION CHAMBERS Male Medical sciences Miscellaneous PATIENTS PLANNING PROSTATE Prostatic Neoplasms - radiotherapy QUALITY ASSURANCE Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards Quality Control RADIATION DOSES Radiology RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE Radiometry - methods Radiometry - standards RADIOTHERAPY Radiotherapy Dosage Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - instrumentation Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - standards Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) RapidArc Spinal Neoplasms - radiotherapy VERTEBRAE Volumetric modulated arc therapy |
| Title | Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy: Effective and Efficient End-to-End Patient-Specific Quality Assurance |
| URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0360301611001490 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0360301611001490 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.01.018 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21470797 https://www.proquest.com/docview/929506701 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/22056199 |
| Volume | 82 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: Baden-Württemberg Complete Freedom Collection (Elsevier) customDbUrl: eissn: 1879-355X dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0001174 issn: 0360-3016 databaseCode: GBLVA dateStart: 20110101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com providerName: Elsevier – providerCode: PRVLSH databaseName: Elsevier Journals customDbUrl: mediaType: online eissn: 1879-355X dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0001174 issn: 0360-3016 databaseCode: AKRWK dateStart: 19761001 isFulltext: true providerName: Library Specific Holdings |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELdKJyFeEN8UxuQHxMvkKd9OeZvQqol9IFgL5clKHGe0gqS0KRL8R_yX3MWOE6BTB1IURW6vaXu_-M7nu98R8hzWFIkbKcU8nsICRSacJZhMlaU89jEtyqnLx87Oo-NJ8HoaTnu9n52spXWVHsgfG-tK_kerMAZ6xSrZf9Cs_VAYgGvQL5xBw3C-lo7f11MLcuyzL2WGjbjAfcTie11VVZM56YQNzA_CELmqGSNw_18VGatKppAnQHOrMqy6xMwhU2n5fR8c6_XSwmLeJr23McQO88QSaQ60A1pIWwSTtvUwOopinXjMs9EV7t00mzZ0XiPs4tPsW2s51jj0dh-JAWYWkR81DcIoKS4ZnrqBDMwIsfkveu6N-ZCB-zPVpmnDmJmwY68DzLAz-8JalG80CzpCMT-YzZdlujDErXjErRlstv7P34jR5PRUjI-m4xeLrwwblOFGvunWcoPseGBAnD7ZOTx59-HEmn1XU37bb9zUadbJhH_f-Co_qF_C1I4ZuskKHtJcd1e5evlTu0HjO-S2Wb_QQw3Gu6Sninvk5pnJ0LhPLjdhkgImqcHkS2oRSQGR1CKStoikfyKSGkRSi8gHZDI6Gr86ZqaZB5OhxysGrrrkfj7MMh9MQJyAX5l50nWkq2InSVXmxAmP4CqWXpCn8KLrp1EU5NgxwQf_6iHpF2WhHhMaSPAW0gCjGU7A8yR2otjPQi4dbCaQ5QPiN3-tkIbpHhuufBZNSuNcaIUIVIhw8IgHhFmphWZ62fL-sNGaaKqYwe4KwNwWOb5JTq3MA7sSrlh5whEX4FxiwCJCVkc3GDpdSeMfa7_3GvfcRVihFFJDS8yhAzEsso_c4XBA9n6Dm_39dTQi8PiA0AZ_AswP7ikmhSrXKwGrqxBL_dwBeaRx2Qq7AdJv8ifbhZ-SW-2MsEv61XKtnoGzX6V75jH7BRA-A8I |
| linkProvider | Library Specific Holdings |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Volumetric-modulated+arc+therapy%3A+effective+and+efficient+end-to-end+patient-specific+quality+assurance&rft.jtitle=International+journal+of+radiation+oncology%2C+biology%2C+physics&rft.au=O%27Daniel%2C+Jennifer&rft.au=Das%2C+Shiva&rft.au=Wu%2C+Q+Jackie&rft.au=Yin%2C+Fang-Fang&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.issn=1879-355X&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1567&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ijrobp.2011.01.018&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F03603016%2FS0360301612X0004X%2Fcov150h.gif |