Development and initial validation of the Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment
Objectives: To describe the development and initial validation of the Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment (NPTDA) as a measure of therapy interventions in neurorehabilitation. Design: An iterative development process, followed by comparison with systemic prospective activity analysis, and p...
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Published in | Clinical rehabilitation Vol. 23; no. 10; pp. 922 - 937 | 
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , | 
| Format | Journal Article | 
| Language | English | 
| Published | 
        London, England
          SAGE Publications
    
        01.10.2009
     Sage Publications Ltd  | 
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text | 
| ISSN | 0269-2155 1477-0873 1477-0873  | 
| DOI | 10.1177/0269215509337447 | 
Cover
| Abstract | Objectives: To describe the development and initial validation of the Northwick Park
Therapy Dependency Assessment (NPTDA) as a measure of therapy interventions in
neurorehabilitation.
Design: An iterative development process, followed by comparison with systemic
prospective activity analysis, and parallel application of prospective and
retrospective scores
Setting: A tertiary specialist inpatient neurorehabilitation service
Participants: A total of 37 patients (M:F 21:16, mean age 41.8 (SD 14.7) years) with
complex neurological disability in two consecutive cross-sectional cohorts.
Methods: The NPTDA was developed and refined over 18 months, together with an
algorithm that converts ordinal scores to estimated therapy hours/week.
NPTDA-estimated hours were compared with ‘actual’ therapy hours/week, identified from
activity analysis. In a subsequent cohort analysis, prospectively rated NPTDA scores
(reflecting intended levels of intervention) were compared with retrospective NPTDA
scores (actual interventions).
Results: NPTDA-estimated therapy hours/week were strongly correlated with those
identified from activity analysis, for total scores (Spearman rho 0.77, P<0.0001),
and also for all five subdomains for direct (hands-on) intervention (rho 0.70—0.93,
P<0.0001). The initial test algorithm overestimated therapy hours (Wilcoxon z
=3.9, P<0.001). After adjustment, reanalysis using a revised algorithm showed this
bias to be removed (Wilcoxon z =1.4 P =0.15). Prospective and retrospectively applied
total NPTDA scores were strongly correlated (rho 0.61, P<0.0001). Although
intended levels of intervention were higher than those actually delivered (Wilcoxon z
=3.30, P<0.001), the differences corresponded to real deviations from intended
practice.
Conclusion: In this initial evaluation, after revision of the algorithm, the NPTDA
provided acceptable estimate of therapy interventions. Further evaluation is now
required in other populations and settings. | 
    
|---|---|
| AbstractList | To describe the development and initial validation of the Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment (NPTDA) as a measure of therapy interventions in neurorehabilitation.OBJECTIVESTo describe the development and initial validation of the Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment (NPTDA) as a measure of therapy interventions in neurorehabilitation.An iterative development process, followed by comparison with systemic prospective activity analysis, and parallel application of prospective and retrospective scores.DESIGNAn iterative development process, followed by comparison with systemic prospective activity analysis, and parallel application of prospective and retrospective scores.A tertiary specialist inpatient neurorehabilitation service.SETTINGA tertiary specialist inpatient neurorehabilitation service.A total of 37 patients (M:F 21:16, mean age 41.8 (SD 14.7) years) with complex neurological disability in two consecutive cross-sectional cohorts.PARTICIPANTSA total of 37 patients (M:F 21:16, mean age 41.8 (SD 14.7) years) with complex neurological disability in two consecutive cross-sectional cohorts.The NPTDA was developed and refined over 18 months, together with an algorithm that converts ordinal scores to estimated therapy hours/week. NPTDA-estimated hours were compared with 'actual' therapy hours/week, identified from activity analysis. In a subsequent cohort analysis, prospectively rated NPTDA scores (reflecting intended levels of intervention) were compared with retrospective NPTDA scores (actual interventions).METHODSThe NPTDA was developed and refined over 18 months, together with an algorithm that converts ordinal scores to estimated therapy hours/week. NPTDA-estimated hours were compared with 'actual' therapy hours/week, identified from activity analysis. In a subsequent cohort analysis, prospectively rated NPTDA scores (reflecting intended levels of intervention) were compared with retrospective NPTDA scores (actual interventions).NPTDA-estimated therapy hours/week were strongly correlated with those identified from activity analysis, for total scores (Spearman rho 0.77, P<0.0001), and also for all five subdomains for direct (hands-on) intervention (rho 0.70-0.93, P<0.0001). The initial test algorithm overestimated therapy hours (Wilcoxon z =3.9, P<0.001). After adjustment, reanalysis using a revised algorithm showed this bias to be removed (Wilcoxon z =1.4 P =0.15). Prospective and retrospectively applied total NPTDA scores were strongly correlated (rho 0.61, P<0.0001). Although intended levels of intervention were higher than those actually delivered (Wilcoxon z =3.30, P<0.001), the differences corresponded to real deviations from intended practice.RESULTSNPTDA-estimated therapy hours/week were strongly correlated with those identified from activity analysis, for total scores (Spearman rho 0.77, P<0.0001), and also for all five subdomains for direct (hands-on) intervention (rho 0.70-0.93, P<0.0001). The initial test algorithm overestimated therapy hours (Wilcoxon z =3.9, P<0.001). After adjustment, reanalysis using a revised algorithm showed this bias to be removed (Wilcoxon z =1.4 P =0.15). Prospective and retrospectively applied total NPTDA scores were strongly correlated (rho 0.61, P<0.0001). Although intended levels of intervention were higher than those actually delivered (Wilcoxon z =3.30, P<0.001), the differences corresponded to real deviations from intended practice.In this initial evaluation, after revision of the algorithm, the NPTDA provided acceptable estimate of therapy interventions. Further evaluation is now required in other populations and settings.CONCLUSIONIn this initial evaluation, after revision of the algorithm, the NPTDA provided acceptable estimate of therapy interventions. Further evaluation is now required in other populations and settings. Objectives: To describe the development and initial validation of the Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment (NPTDA) as a measure of therapy interventions in neurorehabilitation. Design: An iterative development process, followed by comparison with systemic prospective activity analysis, and parallel application of prospective and retrospective scores Setting: A tertiary specialist inpatient neurorehabilitation service Participants: A total of 37 patients (M:F 21:16, mean age 41.8 (SD 14.7) years) with complex neurological disability in two consecutive cross-sectional cohorts. Methods: The NPTDA was developed and refined over 18 months, together with an algorithm that converts ordinal scores to estimated therapy hours/week. NPTDA-estimated hours were compared with ‘actual’ therapy hours/week, identified from activity analysis. In a subsequent cohort analysis, prospectively rated NPTDA scores (reflecting intended levels of intervention) were compared with retrospective NPTDA scores (actual interventions). Results: NPTDA-estimated therapy hours/week were strongly correlated with those identified from activity analysis, for total scores (Spearman rho 0.77, P<0.0001), and also for all five subdomains for direct (hands-on) intervention (rho 0.70—0.93, P<0.0001). The initial test algorithm overestimated therapy hours (Wilcoxon z =3.9, P<0.001). After adjustment, reanalysis using a revised algorithm showed this bias to be removed (Wilcoxon z =1.4 P =0.15). Prospective and retrospectively applied total NPTDA scores were strongly correlated (rho 0.61, P<0.0001). Although intended levels of intervention were higher than those actually delivered (Wilcoxon z =3.30, P<0.001), the differences corresponded to real deviations from intended practice. Conclusion: In this initial evaluation, after revision of the algorithm, the NPTDA provided acceptable estimate of therapy interventions. Further evaluation is now required in other populations and settings. Objectives: To describe the development and initial validation of the Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment (NPTDA) as a measure of therapy interventions in neurorehabilitation. Design: An iterative development process, followed by comparison with systemic prospective activity analysis, and parallel application of prospective and retrospective scores. Setting: A tertiary specialist inpatient neurorehabilitation service, Participants: A total of 37 patients (M:F 21:16, mean age 41.8 (SD 14.7) years) with complex neurological disability in two consecutive cross- sectional cohorts. Methods: The NPTDA was developed and refined over 18 months, together with an algorithm that converts ordinal scores to estimated therapy hours/week. NPTDA-estimated hours were compared with 'actual' therapy hours/week, identified from activity analysis. In a subsequent cohort analysis, prospectively rated NPTDA scores (reflecting intended levels of intervention) were compared with retrospective NPTDA scores (actual interventions). Results: NPTDA-estimated therapy hours/week were strongly correlated with those identified from activity analysis, for total scores (Spearman rho 0.77, P<0.0001), and also for all five subdomains for direct (hands-on) intervention (rho 0.70-0.93, P<0.0001). The initial test algorithm overestimated therapy hours (Wilcoxon z =3.9, P<0.001). After adjustment, reanalysis using a revised algorithm showed this bias to be removed (Wilcoxon z =1.4 P =0.15). Prospective and retrospectively applied total NPTDA scores were strongly correlated (rho 0.61, P 0.0001). Although intended levels of intervention were higher than those actually delivered (Wilcoxon z =3.30, P<0.001), the differences corresponded to real deviations from intended practice. Conclusion: In this initial evaluation, after revision of the algorithm, the NPTDA provided acceptable estimate of therapy interventions. Further evaluation is now required in other populations and settings. Objectives: To describe the development and initial validation of the Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment (NPTDA) as a measure of therapy interventions in neurorehabilitation. Design: An iterative development process, followed by comparison with systemic prospective activity analysis, and parallel application of prospective and retrospective scores Setting: A tertiary specialist inpatient neurorehabilitation service Participants: A total of 37 patients (M:F 21:16, mean age 41.8 (SD 14.7) years) with complex neurological disability in two consecutive cross-sectional cohorts. Methods: The NPTDA was developed and refined over 18 months, together with an algorithm that converts ordinal scores to estimated therapy hours/week. NPTDA-estimated hours were compared with "actual" therapy hours/week, identified from activity analysis. In a subsequent cohort analysis, prospectively rated NPTDA scores (reflecting intended levels of intervention) were compared with retrospective NPTDA scores (actual interventions). Results: NPTDA-estimated therapy hours/week were strongly correlated with those identified from activity analysis, for total scores (Spearman rho 0.77, P<0.0001), and also for all five subdomains for direct (hands-on) intervention (rho 0.70--0.93, P<0.0001). The initial test algorithm overestimated therapy hours (Wilcoxon z =3.9, P<0.001). After adjustment, reanalysis using a revised algorithm showed this bias to be removed (Wilcoxon z =1.4 P =0.15). Prospective and retrospectively applied total NPTDA scores were strongly correlated (rho 0.61, P<0.0001). Although intended levels of intervention were higher than those actually delivered (Wilcoxon z =3.30, P<0.001), the differences corresponded to real deviations from intended practice. Conclusion: In this initial evaluation, after revision of the algorithm, the NPTDA provided acceptable estimate of therapy interventions. Further evaluation is now required in other populations and settings. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] To describe the development and initial validation of the Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment (NPTDA) as a measure of therapy interventions in neurorehabilitation. An iterative development process, followed by comparison with systemic prospective activity analysis, and parallel application of prospective and retrospective scores. A tertiary specialist inpatient neurorehabilitation service. A total of 37 patients (M:F 21:16, mean age 41.8 (SD 14.7) years) with complex neurological disability in two consecutive cross-sectional cohorts. The NPTDA was developed and refined over 18 months, together with an algorithm that converts ordinal scores to estimated therapy hours/week. NPTDA-estimated hours were compared with 'actual' therapy hours/week, identified from activity analysis. In a subsequent cohort analysis, prospectively rated NPTDA scores (reflecting intended levels of intervention) were compared with retrospective NPTDA scores (actual interventions). NPTDA-estimated therapy hours/week were strongly correlated with those identified from activity analysis, for total scores (Spearman rho 0.77, P<0.0001), and also for all five subdomains for direct (hands-on) intervention (rho 0.70-0.93, P<0.0001). The initial test algorithm overestimated therapy hours (Wilcoxon z =3.9, P<0.001). After adjustment, reanalysis using a revised algorithm showed this bias to be removed (Wilcoxon z =1.4 P =0.15). Prospective and retrospectively applied total NPTDA scores were strongly correlated (rho 0.61, P<0.0001). Although intended levels of intervention were higher than those actually delivered (Wilcoxon z =3.30, P<0.001), the differences corresponded to real deviations from intended practice. In this initial evaluation, after revision of the algorithm, the NPTDA provided acceptable estimate of therapy interventions. Further evaluation is now required in other populations and settings. Objectives: To describe the development and initial validation of the Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment (NPTDA) as a measure of therapy interventions in neurorehabilitation. Design: An iterative development process, followed by comparison with systemic prospective activity analysis, and parallel application of prospective and retrospective scores Setting: A tertiary specialist inpatient neurorehabilitation service Participants: A total of 37 patients (M:F 21:16, mean age 41.8 (SD 14.7) years) with complex neurological disability in two consecutive cross-sectional cohorts. Methods: The NPTDA was developed and refined over 18 months, together with an algorithm that converts ordinal scores to estimated therapy hours/week. NPTDA-estimated hours were compared with ‘actual’ therapy hours/week, identified from activity analysis. In a subsequent cohort analysis, prospectively rated NPTDA scores (reflecting intended levels of intervention) were compared with retrospective NPTDA scores (actual interventions). Results: NPTDA-estimated therapy hours/week were strongly correlated with those identified from activity analysis, for total scores (Spearman rho 0.77, P<0.0001), and also for all five subdomains for direct (hands-on) intervention (rho 0.70—0.93, P<0.0001). The initial test algorithm overestimated therapy hours (Wilcoxon z =3.9, P<0.001). After adjustment, reanalysis using a revised algorithm showed this bias to be removed (Wilcoxon z =1.4 P =0.15). Prospective and retrospectively applied total NPTDA scores were strongly correlated (rho 0.61, P<0.0001). Although intended levels of intervention were higher than those actually delivered (Wilcoxon z =3.30, P<0.001), the differences corresponded to real deviations from intended practice. Conclusion: In this initial evaluation, after revision of the algorithm, the NPTDA provided acceptable estimate of therapy interventions. Further evaluation is now required in other populations and settings. Objectives: To describe the development and initial validation of the Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment (NPTDA) as a measure of therapy interventions in neurorehabilitation. Design: An iterative development process, followed by comparison with systemic prospective activity analysis, and parallel application of prospective and retrospective scores Setting: A tertiary specialist inpatient neurorehabilitation service Participants: A total of 37 patients (M:F 21:16, mean age 41.8 (SD 14.7) years) with complex neurological disability in two consecutive cross-sectional cohorts. Methods: The NPTDA was developed and refined over 18 months, together with an algorithm that converts ordinal scores to estimated therapy hours/week. NPTDA-estimated hours were compared with 'actual' therapy hours/week, identified from activity analysis. In a subsequent cohort analysis, prospectively rated NPTDA scores (reflecting intended levels of intervention) were compared with retrospective NPTDA scores (actual interventions). Results: NPTDA-estimated therapy hours/week were strongly correlated with those identified from activity analysis, for total scores (Spearman rho 0.77, P<0.0001), and also for all five subdomains for direct (hands-on) intervention (rho 0.70--0.93, P<0.0001). The initial test algorithm overestimated therapy hours (Wilcoxon z =3.9, P<0.001). After adjustment, reanalysis using a revised algorithm showed this bias to be removed (Wilcoxon z =1.4 P =0.15). Prospective and retrospectively applied total NPTDA scores were strongly correlated (rho 0.61, P<0.0001). Although intended levels of intervention were higher than those actually delivered (Wilcoxon z =3.30, P<0.001), the differences corresponded to real deviations from intended practice. Conclusion: In this initial evaluation, after revision of the algorithm, the NPTDA provided acceptable estimate of therapy interventions. Further evaluation is now required in other populations and settings. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Ltd., copyright holder.] Objectives: To describe the development and initial validation of the Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment (NPTDA) as a measure of therapy interventions in neurorehabilitation. Design: An iterative development process, followed by comparison with systemic prospective activity analysis, and parallel application of prospective and retrospective scores Setting: A tertiary specialist inpatient neurorehabilitation service Participants: A total of 37 patients (M:F 21:16, mean age 41.8 (SD 14.7) years) with complex neurological disability in two consecutive cross-sectional cohorts. Methods: The NPTDA was developed and refined over 18 months, together with an algorithm that converts ordinal scores to estimated therapy hours/week. NPTDA-estimated hours were compared with ‘actual' therapy hours/week, identified from activity analysis. In a subsequent cohort analysis, prospectively rated NPTDA scores (reflecting intended levels of intervention) were compared with retrospective NPTDA scores (actual interventions). Results: NPTDA-estimated therapy hours/week were strongly correlated with those identified from activity analysis, for total scores (Spearman rho 0.77, P < 0.0001), and also for all five subdomains for direct (hands-on) intervention (rho 0.70–0.93, P < 0.0001). The initial test algorithm overestimated therapy hours (Wilcoxon z = ⊟3.9, P < 0.001). After adjustment, reanalysis using a revised algorithm showed this bias to be removed (Wilcoxon z = ⊟1.4 P = 0.15). Prospective and retrospectively applied total NPTDA scores were strongly correlated (rho 0.61, P < 0.0001). Although intended levels of intervention were higher than those actually delivered (Wilcoxon z = ⊟3.30, P < 0.001), the differences corresponded to real deviations from intended practice. Conclusion: In this initial evaluation, after revision of the algorithm, the NPTDA provided acceptable estimate of therapy interventions. Further evaluation is now required in other populations and settings.  | 
    
| Author | Rose, Hilary Shaw, Asa Turner-Stokes, Lynne Law, Janet  | 
    
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Lynne surname: Turner-Stokes fullname: Turner-Stokes, Lynne email: Lynne.turner-stokes@dial.pipex.com organization: King's College London, School of Medicine, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation and Regional Rehabilitation Unit, Northwick Park Hospital – sequence: 2 givenname: Asa surname: Shaw fullname: Shaw, Asa organization: Regional Rehabilitation Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK – sequence: 3 givenname: Janet surname: Law fullname: Law, Janet organization: Regional Rehabilitation Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK – sequence: 4 givenname: Hilary surname: Rose fullname: Rose, Hilary organization: Regional Rehabilitation Unit, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK  | 
    
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19779007$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed | 
    
| BookMark | eNqNkktv1DAUhS1URKeFPStksYBVwK_YyQapanlJFbAobC3Hvum4zdipnUw1_56EGWlgJAorL853jq_P9Qk6CjEAQs8peUOpUm8JkzWjZUlqzpUQ6hFaUKFUQSrFj9BilotZP0YnOd8QQiom6BN0TGulakLUAv24gDV0sV9BGLAJDvvgB286vDadd2bwMeDY4mEJ-EtMw_Le21v8zaRbfLWEZPoNvoAegoNgN_gsZ8h5jnqKHremy_Bsd56i7x_eX51_Ki6_fvx8fnZZ2JLxoQBCHDGOqkY2vDKcEclaVVVSlspZ3jjWMhDgjHWVkFY2UlIjW6aIaWxNGT9FdJs7ht5s7k3X6T75lUkbTYmeO9KHHU2ed1tPPzYrcHYaN5m9Lxqv_1SCX-rruNasErSk9RTweheQ4t0IedArny10nQkQx6yVojUVgvN_k5zXRJFaTOSrB8lyQiWvZvDlAXgTxxSmkjWbNiqIVPO9L35_4r6T3d4ngGwBm2LOCdr_qU0eWKwffn2QqSTfPWQstsZsrmE_7V_5n6zf27E | 
    
| CODEN | CEHAEN | 
    
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_scs_12018 crossref_primary_10_1177_1460408619871801 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0132275 crossref_primary_10_3109_09638288_2014_998779 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_orhc_2012_08_001 crossref_primary_10_1080_02699052_2017_1406989 crossref_primary_10_1177_02692155231158475 crossref_primary_10_1177_0269215511417467 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2021_052728 crossref_primary_10_12968_ijtr_2017_0139 crossref_primary_10_4103_ijprm_JISPRM_000166 crossref_primary_10_1177_14782715241242509 crossref_primary_10_1111_dmcn_13648 crossref_primary_10_3109_09638288_2012_670033  | 
    
| Cites_doi | 10.1080/09638280500534861 10.1080/165019702760390347 10.1136/bmj.312.7047.1623 10.1191/026921599673198490 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181663533 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.127 10.2307/2529310 10.1191/026921501680425225 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.023 10.1191/0269215505cr808oa 10.1080/16501970310010457 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.128 10.1191/0269215502cr474oa 10.1191/0269215506cr981oa 10.1191/026921598669173600 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.033 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.044  | 
    
| ContentType | Journal Article | 
    
| Copyright | The Author(s), 2009. SAGE Publications © Oct 2009 The Author(s) 2009. Published by SAGE. All rights reserved. SAGE Publications 2009 The Author(s)  | 
    
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s), 2009. – notice: SAGE Publications © Oct 2009 – notice: The Author(s) 2009. Published by SAGE. All rights reserved. SAGE Publications 2009 The Author(s)  | 
    
| DBID | AFRWT AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 0-V 3V. 7QJ 7RV 7X7 7XB 88C 88E 88G 88J 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA ALSLI AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HEHIP K9- K9. KB0 M0R M0S M0T M1P M2M M2R M2S NAPCQ PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL POGQB PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRQQA PSYQQ Q9U 7X8 5PM ADTOC UNPAY  | 
    
| DOI | 10.1177/0269215509337447 | 
    
| DatabaseName | Openly Available Collection - Sage Journals CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】 ProQuest Central (Corporate) Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Psychology Database (Alumni) Social Science Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Social Science Premium Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student Sociology Collection Consumer Health Database (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) Consumer Health Database Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Healthcare Administration Database Medical Database Psychology Database Social Science Database Sociology Database Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Social Sciences ProQuest One Psychology ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Unpaywall for CDI: Periodical Content Unpaywall  | 
    
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest One Psychology ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Social Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing Sociology & Social Sciences Collection ProQuest Family Health (Alumni Edition) Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Sociology Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Sociology ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Social Science Premium Collection ProQuest One Social Sciences ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Family Health ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health Management ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection Sociology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Social Science Journals ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest Psychology Journals ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic  | 
    
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef ProQuest One Psychology MEDLINE Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA)  | 
    
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: UNPAY name: Unpaywall url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://unpaywall.org/ sourceTypes: Open Access Repository – sequence: 4 dbid: AFRWT name: Sage Journals Open Access url: http://journals.sagepub.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 5 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database  | 
    
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc | 
    
| Discipline | Occupational Therapy & Rehabilitation Physical Therapy Nursing  | 
    
| EISSN | 1477-0873 | 
    
| EndPage | 937 | 
    
| ExternalDocumentID | 10.1177/0269215509337447 PMC2841519 1899100841 19779007 10_1177_0269215509337447 10.1177_0269215509337447  | 
    
| Genre | Validation Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article  | 
    
| GeographicLocations | United Kingdom--UK | 
    
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United Kingdom--UK | 
    
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Department of Health grantid: RP-PG-0407-10185 – fundername: Department of Health grantid: 030/0066  | 
    
| GroupedDBID | --- -TM .2E .2F .2G .2J .2N .GJ .WF 0-V 01A 0R~ 1~K 29B 31R 31S 31U 31X 31Y 31Z 36B 39C 4.4 53G 54M 5GY 5VS 6PF 7RV 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ 8R4 8R5 AABMB AABOD AACKU AACMV AACTG AADUE AAEWN AAGGD AAGLT AAGMC AAJIQ AAJOX AAJPV AAKFR AAKGS AANSI AAPEO AAQDB AAQXH AAQXI AARDL AARIX AASIJ AATAA AATBZ AAUAS AAWTL AAXOT AAYTG AAZBJ ABAWP ABCCA ABCJG ABDWY ABEIX ABFWQ ABHKI ABHQH ABIDT ABIVO ABJNI ABJZC ABKRH ABLUO ABPGX ABPNF ABQKF ABQXT ABRHV ABUJY ABUWG ABVFX ABYTW ACARO ACDSZ ACDXX ACFEJ ACFMA ACFYK ACGBL ACGFS ACGZU ACJER ACJTF ACLFY ACLHI ACLZU ACOFE ACOXC ACROE ACRPL ACSIQ ACUAV ACUIR ACXKE ACXMB ADBBV ADDLC ADEBD ADEIA ADMPF ADNBR ADNMO ADNON ADRRZ ADSTG ADTBJ ADUKL ADVBO ADYCS ADZZY AECGH AECVZ AEDTQ AEFTW AEILP AEKYL AENEX AEPTA AEQLS AERKM AESZF AEUHG AEWDL AEWHI AEXFG AEXNY AFEET AFKBI AFKRA AFKRG AFMOU AFQAA AFRWT AFUIA AFWMB AFXQA AGHKR AGKLV AGNHF AGPXR AGQPQ AGWFA AGWNL AHDMH AHHFK AHMBA AIGRN AIIQI AJABX AJEFB AJMMQ AJSCY AJUZI AJXAJ ALIPV ALKWR ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALSLI AMCVQ ANDLU AQUVI ARALO ARTOV ASOEW ASPBG AUTPY AUVAJ AVWKF AYAKG AZFZN AZQEC B3H B8M B8O B8R B8Z B93 B94 BBRGL BDDNI BENPR BKEYQ BKIIM BKNYI BKSCU BPACV BPHCQ BSEHC BVXVI BWJAD BYIEH C45 CAG CBRKF CCPQU CDWPY CFDXU COF CORYS CQQTX CS3 CUTAK DB0 DC- DC. DC0 DD- DD0 DE- DF0 DO- DOPDO DU5 DV7 DV9 DWQXO D~Y EBS EJD EMOBN EX3 F5P FEDTE FHBDP FYUFA GNUQQ GROUPED_SAGE_PREMIER_JOURNAL_COLLECTION H13 HEHIP HF~ HMCUK HVGLF HZ~ J5H J8X K.F K.J K9- M0R M0T M1P M2M M2R M2S N9A NAPCQ O9- OVD P.B P2P PCD PHGZM PHGZT PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PSYQQ Q1R Q2X Q7K Q7L Q7R Q7U Q7X Q82 Q83 ROL S01 SASJQ SAUOL SCNPE SDB SFB SFC SFK SFN SFT SGA SGO SGP SGR SGV SGX SGZ SHG SNB SPJ SPQ SPV SQCSI STM TEORI UKHRP WOW YRY ZONMY ZPPRI ZRKOI ZSSAH AAEJI AAPII AAYXX AJGYC AJHME AJVBE CITATION PJZUB POGQB PPXIY PRQQA PUEGO CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7QJ 7XB 8FK K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI Q9U 7X8 5PM ADTOC AFFHD UNPAY  | 
    
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-e00d0ad17b6b38a32062f7886657dc3bd2f2e4edacd846c6b661a6f270abc9123 | 
    
| IEDL.DBID | AFRWT | 
    
| ISSN | 0269-2155 1477-0873  | 
    
| IngestDate | Wed Oct 29 12:16:36 EDT 2025 Tue Sep 30 16:46:27 EDT 2025 Sun Sep 28 00:05:04 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 27 23:40:33 EDT 2025 Thu Oct 02 06:38:17 EDT 2025 Fri Oct 03 06:50:19 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:59:03 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 06:46:14 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:04:19 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:48:00 EDT 2025  | 
    
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true | 
    
| IsOpenAccess | true | 
    
| IsPeerReviewed | true | 
    
| IsScholarly | true | 
    
| Issue | 10 | 
    
| Language | English | 
    
| License | This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm). https://journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. cc-by-nc  | 
    
| LinkModel | DirectLink | 
    
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c523t-e00d0ad17b6b38a32062f7886657dc3bd2f2e4edacd846c6b661a6f270abc9123 | 
    
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1  | 
    
| OpenAccessLink | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0269215509337447?utm_source=summon&utm_medium=discovery-provider | 
    
| PMID | 19779007 | 
    
| PQID | 200740673 | 
    
| PQPubID | 32201 | 
    
| PageCount | 16 | 
    
| ParticipantIDs | unpaywall_primary_10_1177_0269215509337447 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2841519 proquest_miscellaneous_771914433 proquest_miscellaneous_733907094 proquest_miscellaneous_57336384 proquest_journals_200740673 pubmed_primary_19779007 crossref_primary_10_1177_0269215509337447 crossref_citationtrail_10_1177_0269215509337447 sage_journals_10_1177_0269215509337447  | 
    
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX  | 
    
| PublicationCentury | 2000 | 
    
| PublicationDate | 2009-10-01 | 
    
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2009-10-01 | 
    
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2009 text: 2009-10-01 day: 01  | 
    
| PublicationDecade | 2000 | 
    
| PublicationPlace | London, England | 
    
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London, England – name: England – name: London – name: UK  | 
    
| PublicationTitle | Clinical rehabilitation | 
    
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Clin Rehabil | 
    
| PublicationYear | 2009 | 
    
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Sage Publications Ltd  | 
    
| Publisher_xml | – name: SAGE Publications – name: Sage Publications Ltd  | 
    
| References | De Jong G., Horn SD, Gassaway JA, Slavin MD, Dijkers MP 2004; 85 van Langeveld SA, Post MW, van Asbeck FW, Postma K., Ten Dam D., Pons K. 2008; 32 Hatfield A., Hunt S., Wade DT 2003; 35 Skinner A., Turner-Stokes L. 2005; 20 Gladman J., Barer D., Langhorne P. 1996; 312 Bode RK, Heinemann AW, Semik P., Mallinson T. 2004; 85 van Langeveld SA, Post MW, van Asbeck FW, Postma K., Leenders J., Pons K. 2008; 89 Svensson S., Sonn U., Sunnerhagen KS 2005; 19 De Wit L., Kamsteegt H., Yadav B., Verheyden G., Feys H., De Weerdt W. 2007; 21 Turner-Stokes L., Tonge P., Nyein K., Hunter M., Nielson S, Robinson. 1998; 12 Richards LG, Latham NK, Jette DU, Rosenberg L., Smout RJ, DeJong G. 2005; 86 Ballinger C., Ashburn A., Low J., Roderick P. 1999; 13 Kwakkel G. 2006; 28 Slade A., Chamberlain MA, Tennant A. 2002; 34 Post MW, Visser-Meily JM, Gispen LS 2002; 16 Latham NK, Jette DU, Slavin M. 2005; 86 Shiel A., Burn JPS, Henry D. 2001; 15 Landis JR, Koch GG 1977; 33 atypb9 atypb8 atypb19 atypb15 atypb16 De Wit L. (atypb7) 2007; 21 atypb17 atypb11 atypb12 Khan F. (atypb20) 2009 atypb13 atypb14 atypb1 Turner-Stokes L. (atypb18) 2006 atypb3 atypb2 atypb10 atypb5 atypb4 atypb6  | 
    
| References_xml | – volume: 21 start-page: 450 year: 2007 end-page: 59 article-title: Defining the content of individual physiotherapy and occupational therapy sessions for stroke patients in an inpatient rehabilitation setting publication-title: Development, validation and interrater reliability of a scoring list. Clin Rehabil – volume: 86 start-page: S41 issue: 2 year: 2005 end-page: S50 article-title: Physical therapy during stroke rehabilitation for people with different walking abilities publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil – volume: 19 start-page: 419 year: 2005 end-page: 25 article-title: Reliability and validity of the Northwick Park Dependency Score (NPDS) Swedish version 6.0 publication-title: Clin Rehabil – volume: 20 start-page: 609 year: 2005 end-page: 15 article-title: The use of standardised outcome measures for rehabilitation in the UK publication-title: Clin Rehabil – volume: 35 start-page: 116 year: 2003 end-page: 20 article-title: The Northwick Park Dependency Score and its relationship to nursing hours in neurological rehabilitation publication-title: J Rehabil Med – volume: 85 start-page: 1901 year: 2004 end-page: 908 article-title: Patterns of therapy activities across length of stay and impairment levels: peering inside the ‘black box’ of inpatient stroke rehabilitation publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil – volume: 32 start-page: 2 year: 2008 end-page: 7 article-title: Development of a classification of physical, occupational, and sports therapy interventions to document mobility and self-care in spinal cord injury rehabilitation publication-title: J Neurol Phys Ther – volume: 28 start-page: 823 year: 2006 end-page: 30 article-title: Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration publication-title: Disabil Rehabil – volume: 12 start-page: 304 year: 1998 end-page: 18 article-title: The Northwick Park Dependency Score (NPDS): a measure of nursing dependency in rehabilitation publication-title: Clin Rehabil – volume: 34 start-page: 260 year: 2002 end-page: 66 article-title: A randomised controlled trial to determine the effect of intensity of therapy on length of stay in a neurological rehabilitation setting publication-title: J Rehabil Med – volume: 89 start-page: 1454 year: 2008 end-page: 59 article-title: Feasibility of a classification system for physical therapy, occupational therapy, and sports therapy interventions for mobility and self-care in spinal cord injury rehabilitation publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil – volume: 312 start-page: 1623 year: 1996 end-page: 24 article-title: Specialist rehabilitation after stroke (editorial) publication-title: BMJ – volume: 15 start-page: 501 year: 2001 end-page: 14 article-title: The effects of increased rehabilitation therapy after brain injury: results of a prospective controlled trial publication-title: Clin Rehabil – volume: 85 start-page: 678 year: 2004 end-page: 86 article-title: Toward a taxonomy of rehabilitation interventions: Using an inductive approach to examine the ‘black box’of rehabilitation publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil – volume: 86 start-page: S51 issue: 2 year: 2005 end-page: S60 article-title: Characterizing occupational therapy practice in stroke rehabilitation publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil – volume: 33 start-page: 159 year: 1977 end-page: 74 article-title: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data publication-title: Biometrics – volume: 13 start-page: 301 year: 1999 end-page: 309 article-title: Unpacking the black box of therapy-a pilot study to describe occupational therapy and physiotherapy interventions for people with stroke publication-title: Clin Rehabil – volume: 16 start-page: 182 year: 2002 end-page: 89 article-title: Measuring nursing needs of stroke patients in clinical rehabilitation: a comparison of validity and sensitivity to change between the Northwick Park Dependency Score and the Barthel Index publication-title: Clin Rehabil – ident: atypb1 doi: 10.1080/09638280500534861 – ident: atypb3 doi: 10.1080/165019702760390347 – ident: atypb4 doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7047.1623 – ident: atypb5 doi: 10.1191/026921599673198490 – ident: atypb12 doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181663533 – ident: atypb10 doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.127 – ident: atypb19 doi: 10.2307/2529310 – ident: atypb2 doi: 10.1191/026921501680425225 – ident: atypb8 doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.023 – ident: atypb17 doi: 10.1191/0269215505cr808oa – volume-title: The Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Score (NPTDA): Development, preliminary evaluation and application year: 2006 ident: atypb18 – volume: 21 start-page: 450 year: 2007 ident: atypb7 publication-title: Development, validation and interrater reliability of a scoring list. Clin Rehabil – ident: atypb15 doi: 10.1080/16501970310010457 – ident: atypb9 doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.128 – ident: atypb14 doi: 10.1191/0269215502cr474oa – ident: atypb16 doi: 10.1191/0269215506cr981oa – volume-title: Clinical practice improvement approach in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: a pilot study year: 2009 ident: atypb20 – ident: atypb13 doi: 10.1191/026921598669173600 – ident: atypb6 doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.033 – ident: atypb11 doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.044  | 
    
| SSID | ssj0008241 | 
    
| Score | 1.9905561 | 
    
| Snippet | Objectives: To describe the development and initial validation of the Northwick Park
Therapy Dependency Assessment (NPTDA) as a measure of therapy... Objectives: To describe the development and initial validation of the Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment (NPTDA) as a measure of therapy... To describe the development and initial validation of the Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment (NPTDA) as a measure of therapy interventions in...  | 
    
| SourceID | unpaywall pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref sage  | 
    
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher  | 
    
| StartPage | 922 | 
    
| SubjectTerms | Adult Algorithms Assessment Clinical medicine Dependency Disability Evaluation Electronic Health Records Female Hospitals Humans Inpatient care Intervention Interventions Male Middle Aged Multidisciplinary teams Nervous System Diseases - rehabilitation Neurology Nursing Observer Variation Occupational therapy Outcome Assessment, Health Care Patients Physical therapy Rehabilitation Workload  | 
    
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: ProQuest One Academic dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV3da9swED-6lLG97CP78roPPWyFDUQcWbGthzG6raUMGkppR9-MvswCwcnWhNH_fne27CQrzR78Yp-xLJ1Od7rT7wfwbpTmZW6HgutSCS7LxHFjhea5t85JVCDt6OzwyTg9vpDfL0eXO3DSnoWhssrWJtaG2s0s7ZEPaE9NEqvK5_kvTqRRlFxtGTR0YFZwn2qEsTuwKwgYqwe7Xw7Hp2edac5FTWWJcYfiuNaNVnnLAd2jWxThZ5LYVtbXqRvO580aynBK_96ymuvrP3o6XVunjh7Bg-BgsoNGIx7Djq_6cDdsCvTh_TqsMDtvMAXYPjvbQOzuw8PTMICtzBP4sVZgxHTl2IQKj1AClXXSUDOxWcnQo2TjlqSd0anq7jPfAuOuvWYHHSLoU7g4Ojz_eswDLQO3GLUuuI9jF2s3zExqklwnIk5FiZE05XCcTYwTpfDSO20dOjc2NegC6LQUWayNVbhSPoNeNav8C2A-c04ludRKomKU0uQjvGSZomUwGBlGMGgHobChB4g6Y1oMW5jyf4Ytgg_dG_MGr2OL7F47rkWYuVdFp2cRvO2e4pSjPIqu_Gx5VdQQktjqCNgtEiig0JaqbSIZIevJBL_zvNGkVXsVgUDG2L5sQ8c6AYIE33xSTX7W0ODobKALpyLYJ21c_dXtXfCx09f_9tfLrf21B_frTFtd6PgKeovfS_8aHbaFeROm4V_uwDrC priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Unpaywall dbid: UNPAY link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1bb9MwFD6C7gFeGIxbGAM_wCSQMlLHtePHahdNSFQTWtF4qnzVKqp0oq3Q-PUcJ07artqAhzzlJHGcz_Fnn3O-A_CuxwtfmC5NlZc0ZT63qTZUpYUz1jIEkLIhd_jLgJ8O2eeL3kXc7wi5MKv--0oYiXJJA43GhbdgTNyHLd5D1t2BreHgrP-93kKRabCpEomESLNC5EuP5MYt1megDVq5GR0Z8-8fLMordf1LTSYrM9DJdi2HNKuEC0PgyY-DxVwfmN83ZB3_5eUew6NIQ0m_xs0TuOfKHXi_KjlMzmu9AbJPvq6pee_A9ln8uI3NU_i2EnxEVGnJOAQloQUCeVyXbSJTT5BtkkFTwJ2EjOv2MUexGq-5Jv1WLfQZDE-Ozw9P01iyITW4op2nLstspmxXaK7zQuU049TjKjv4d6zJtaWeOuasMhaJj-Ea6YHinopMaSNxFn0OnXJaupdAnLBW5gVTkiFoPNNFDw_mOf41NK4aE_jUfMaRiT0QympMRt1GwvxG9ybwob3iqtbyuMN2t0HGKI7qWSjZKVio7JPA2_YsDsfgY1Glmy5mo0peEludALnFAg0k_mflXSYiqO6xHJ_zosbisr0yCERm2D6xhtLWIMiFr58px5eVbDgSEaR3MoH9gOflW93eBR9bxP-1v179j_EuPKycclVM5GvozH8u3B5yu7l-E4f1H_2bQN4 priority: 102 providerName: Unpaywall  | 
    
| Title | Development and initial validation of the Northwick Park Therapy Dependency Assessment | 
    
| URI | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0269215509337447 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19779007 https://www.proquest.com/docview/200740673 https://www.proquest.com/docview/57336384 https://www.proquest.com/docview/733907094 https://www.proquest.com/docview/771914433 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC2841519 https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215509337447  | 
    
| UnpaywallVersion | publishedVersion | 
    
| Volume | 23 | 
    
| hasFullText | 1 | 
    
| inHoldings | 1 | 
    
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1477-0873 dateEnd: 20151231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0008241 issn: 0269-2155 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 19980101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 eissn: 1477-0873 dateEnd: 20151231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0008241 issn: 0269-2155 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 19980101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest  | 
    
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwED9t3QO88DG-wtjwA0wCyTR13Dh5mjpYNSFRVVUL5Sly7ERU6tKJNUL977nLV9tVGzxEkZJL7JzP9l3u7ncA77p-kAamI7hOQ8Fl6lkeG6F5kBhrJQqQtpQ7_G3gX07k12l3ugdZnQtTcfDmE4VVYY-KxZpmN_2NbldOxjYaDqEg5RrNcSWlOsuXV1H5t7suqkFXyD2dX5Fn21A85IrX2W37cCAUWkYtOOj1Rz_GzdodiKLWJb2fUwNrx-ZOm9sb2Y52uhtkWaXxP8iza736o-fzjY2s_wQeVRoo65Ui8xT2kuwQ3m-iDbNxCTXATtloC8j7EB4Pq3GtaZ7B9424I6Yzy2YUj4QUKMOzsmITW6QMFU02qGu3M0q2bpr5UhXiNSvWa4BCn8OkfzH-fMmrag3coDG75InrWlfbjor92Au0J1xfpGhgk2vHGi-2IhWJTKw2FnUe48eoGWg_FcrVsQlxA30BrWyRJa-AJcra0AukDiXKSyrjoIuHTH1cMGI0GB1o16yPTMUBqqgxjzo1evmtwXLgQ_PEdQnjcQ_tUT2aUS2OVK1TSSrq48Db5i7ORHKv6CxZ5DdRgSyJvXaA3UGBBCEuseF9JIoA96SH7bws5Wfd35CwIV3sn9qSrIaAkMK372SzXwViOOogqNmFDpySDK6_6m4WfGyk9J_8ev2_bz2Ch4UvrgiFfAOt5e88OUaVbhmfwL6aqpNqNuL5_GIwHOF5Mhj2fv4Fw7VJKA | 
    
| linkProvider | SAGE Publications | 
    
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bT9swFD5CoIm97NLdMrbhh4G0SVFTx03iBzSxASoDKoTKxFtw7ESrVKWFtkL9cftvOydx0naI7omHvCQnimMfn4t9_H0An9tBlEW6xV2VSe6KzDduorlyo1QbI1CBlKGzw2fdoHMpfl61r9bgT3UWhsoqK5tYGGoz1LRG3qQ1NUGsKt9GNy6RRtHmasWgoSyzgtkrEMbsuY6TdHaHGdx47_gAh3uH86PD3o-Oa0kGXI052MRNPc94yrTCJEj8SPncC3iGeSHtSBjtJ4ZnPBWpUdqgq9ZBgg5NBRkPPZVo2SLcA_QAG8IXEnO_je-H3fOL2hVEvKDOxDxHuuhb2_N90ibdo1u0ohAKYndZ9Iv3gt37NZsWFWBzmo_U7E4NBgt-8egFPLMBLdsvNfAlrKV5A57YRYgG7CzCGLNeiWHAdtnFEkJ4A56fW4WpZF7Br4WCJqZyw_pU6IQSODn6JRUUG2YMI1jWrUjhGZ3irj9zYBl-9Yzt1wikr-HyUUboDaznwzx9BywNjZF-JJQUqIiZSKI2XiIL0BIlmIk60KwGIda2B4iqYxC3Klj0f4bNgS_1G6MSH2SF7FY1rrG1FOO41msHtuunOMVp30bl6XA6jgvISmy1A-wBCRSQaLvlKpGQkPyEj995W2rSvL2SQCc9bF-4pGO1AEGQLz_J-78LKHIMbjBklA7skjbO_-rhLvha6-t_--v9yv7ahs1O7-w0Pj3unmzB02KXryiy_ADrk9tp-hGDxUnyyU5JBtePbQX-AiAYeBo | 
    
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwED_BJgEvfAwGYcD8AJNAypo6bhI_VhvV-KqmqYO9Rf6ItUpVWrFWaP89d4mTtqs2eMiTzx85n-073d3vAN73ksxlpstD5SQPhYttqA1XYVYYawUKkLKUO_xjmJyci68XvQsfm0O5MJ6DV4cUVoUrqi5rOt0z6zrex9hBu0Fy0q3RGk-FSO_DNlo1Mdpe2_3B2a9RexVnvCpdSfQhdVj6KTfGWH-XNpTNzZhJn5X_cFHO1PUfNZmsvEuDp_DYK5SsX0vAM7hXlDvwYRU8mI1q5AB2wM7WcLl34Mmp36aG5jn8XAkjYqq0bEzhRUiBIjmuCzCxqWOoN7JhU4qdUe50O82xr6trrlm_xf18AeeDz6Ojk9AXXwgN2qbzsIgiGynbTXWi40zFPEq4Q3uZPDXWxNpyxwtRWGUsqjAm0fjQq8TxNFLaSHwPd2GrnJbFK2BFaq2MM6GkwO13Qmc9_IRL8PxrtP8C6DSsz43nABXImOTdBoz8xmYF8LHtMatROe6g3Wt2M2-ki4pvpoJq9ASw37biwSJviSqL6eIqr4AicdUBsFsokEDijSnvIkkJP0_EOM_LWn6W65UE9Rjh-tI1yWoJCPh7vaUcX1YA4KhSoKImAzggGVz-1e0s-NRK6T_59fp_R92HB6fHg_z7l-G3PXhUedmqIMc3sDX_vSjeorI21-_8kfwLfH8zbg | 
    
| linkToUnpaywall | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1bb9MwFD6C7gFeGIxbGAM_wCSQMlLHtePHahdNSFQTWtF4qnzVKqp0oq3Q-PUcJ07artqAhzzlJHGcz_Fnn3O-A_CuxwtfmC5NlZc0ZT63qTZUpYUz1jIEkLIhd_jLgJ8O2eeL3kXc7wi5MKv--0oYiXJJA43GhbdgTNyHLd5D1t2BreHgrP-93kKRabCpEomESLNC5EuP5MYt1megDVq5GR0Z8-8fLMordf1LTSYrM9DJdi2HNKuEC0PgyY-DxVwfmN83ZB3_5eUew6NIQ0m_xs0TuOfKHXi_KjlMzmu9AbJPvq6pee_A9ln8uI3NU_i2EnxEVGnJOAQloQUCeVyXbSJTT5BtkkFTwJ2EjOv2MUexGq-5Jv1WLfQZDE-Ozw9P01iyITW4op2nLstspmxXaK7zQuU049TjKjv4d6zJtaWeOuasMhaJj-Ea6YHinopMaSNxFn0OnXJaupdAnLBW5gVTkiFoPNNFDw_mOf41NK4aE_jUfMaRiT0QympMRt1GwvxG9ybwob3iqtbyuMN2t0HGKI7qWSjZKVio7JPA2_YsDsfgY1Glmy5mo0peEludALnFAg0k_mflXSYiqO6xHJ_zosbisr0yCERm2D6xhtLWIMiFr58px5eVbDgSEaR3MoH9gOflW93eBR9bxP-1v179j_EuPKycclVM5GvozH8u3B5yu7l-E4f1H_2bQN4 | 
    
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development+and+initial+validation+of+the+Northwick+Park+Therapy+Dependency+Assessment&rft.jtitle=Clinical+rehabilitation&rft.au=Turner-Stokes%2C+L&rft.au=Shaw%2C+A&rft.au=Law%2C+J&rft.au=Rose%2C+H&rft.date=2009-10-01&rft.issn=0269-2155&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=10&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177%2F0269215509337447&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT | 
    
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0269-2155&client=summon | 
    
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0269-2155&client=summon | 
    
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0269-2155&client=summon |