Verification of a novel atrial fibrillation cryoablation dosing algorithm guided by time-to-pulmonary vein isolation: Results from the Cryo-DOSING Study (Cryoballoon-ablation DOSING Based on the Assessment of Time-to-Effect and Pulmonary Vein Isolation Guidance)

There are no recommendations on the optimal dosing for cryoablation of atrial fibrillation (Cryo-AF). The purpose of this study was to develop and prospectively test a Cryo-AF dosing protocol guided exclusively by time-to-pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (TT-PVI) in patients undergoing a first-time Cry...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHeart rhythm Vol. 14; no. 9; pp. 1319 - 1325
Main Authors Aryana, Arash, Kenigsberg, David N., Kowalski, Marcin, Koo, Charles H., Lim, Hae W., O'Neill, Padraig Gearoid, Bowers, Mark R., Hokanson, Robert B., Ellenbogen, Kenneth A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.09.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1547-5271
1556-3871
1556-3871
DOI10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.06.020

Cover

More Information
Summary:There are no recommendations on the optimal dosing for cryoablation of atrial fibrillation (Cryo-AF). The purpose of this study was to develop and prospectively test a Cryo-AF dosing protocol guided exclusively by time-to-pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (TT-PVI) in patients undergoing a first-time Cryo-AF. In this multicenter study, we examined the acute/long-term safety/efficacy of Cryo-AF using the proposed dosing algorithm (Cryo-AFDosing; n = 355) against a conventional, nonstandardized approach (Cryo-AFConventional; n = 400) in a nonrandomized fashion. Acute PV isolation was achieved in 98.9% of patients in Cryo-AFDosing (TT-PVI = 48 ± 16 seconds) vs 97.2% in Cryo-AFConventional (P = .18). Cryo-AFDosing was associated with shorter (149 ± 34 seconds vs 226 ± 46 seconds; P <.001) and fewer (1.7 ± 0.8 vs 2.9 ± 0.8; P <.001) cryoapplications, reduced overall ablation (16 ± 5 minutes vs 40 ± 14 minutes; P <.001), fluoroscopy time (13 ± 6 minutes vs 29 ± 13 minutes; P <.001), left atrial dwell time (51 ± 14 minutes vs 118 ± 25 minutes; P <.001), and total procedure time (84 ± 23 minutes vs 145 ± 49 minutes; P <.001) but similar nadir balloon temperature (–47°C ± 8°C vs –48°C ± 6°C; P = .41) and total thaw time (43 ± 27 seconds vs 45 ± 19 seconds; P = .09) as compared to Cryo-AFConventional. Adverse events (2.0% vs 2.7%; P = .48), including persistent phrenic nerve palsy (0.6% vs 1.2%; P = .33) and 12-month freedom from all atrial arrhythmias (82.5% vs 78.3%; P = .14), were similar between Cryo-AFDosing and Cryo-AFConventional. However, Cryo-AFDosing was specifically associated with fewer atypical atrial flutters/tachycardias during long-term follow-up (8.5% vs 13.5%; P = .02) as well as fewer late PV reconnections at redo procedures (5.0% vs 18.5%; P <.001). A novel Cryo-AF dosing algorithm guided by TT-PVI can help individualize the ablation strategy and yield improved procedural endpoints and efficiency as compared to a conventional, nonstandardized approach.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1547-5271
1556-3871
1556-3871
DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.06.020