Validation of selection accuracy for the total number of piglets born in Landrace pigs using genomic selection

This study was to determine the relationship between estimated breeding value and phenotype information after farrowing when juvenile selection was made in candidate pigs without phenotype information. After collecting phenotypic and genomic information for the total number of piglets born by Landra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnimal bioscience Vol. 30; no. 2; pp. 149 - 153
Main Authors Oh, Jae-Don, Park, Kyung-Do
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) Asian - Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies 01.02.2017
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies
아세아·태평양축산학회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1011-2367
2765-0189
1976-5517
2765-0235
DOI10.5713/ajas.16.0394

Cover

Abstract This study was to determine the relationship between estimated breeding value and phenotype information after farrowing when juvenile selection was made in candidate pigs without phenotype information. After collecting phenotypic and genomic information for the total number of piglets born by Landrace pigs, selection accuracy between genomic breeding value estimates using genomic information and breeding value estimates of best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) using conventional pedigree information were compared. Genetic standard deviation ( ) for the total number of piglets born was 0.91. Since the total number of piglets born for candidate pigs was unknown, the accuracy of the breeding value estimated from pedigree information was 0.080. When genomic information was used, the accuracy of the breeding value was 0.216. Assuming that the replacement rate of sows per year is 100% and generation interval is 1 year, genetic gain per year is 0.346 head when genomic information is used. It is 0.128 when BLUP is used. Genetic gain estimated from single step best linear unbiased prediction (ssBLUP) method is by 2.7 times higher than that the one estimated from BLUP method, i.e., 270% more improvement in efficiency.
AbstractList OBJECTIVEThis study was to determine the relationship between estimated breeding value and phenotype information after farrowing when juvenile selection was made in candidate pigs without phenotype information.METHODSAfter collecting phenotypic and genomic information for the total number of piglets born by Landrace pigs, selection accuracy between genomic breeding value estimates using genomic information and breeding value estimates of best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) using conventional pedigree information were compared.RESULTSGenetic standard deviation (σa ) for the total number of piglets born was 0.91. Since the total number of piglets born for candidate pigs was unknown, the accuracy of the breeding value estimated from pedigree information was 0.080. When genomic information was used, the accuracy of the breeding value was 0.216. Assuming that the replacement rate of sows per year is 100% and generation interval is 1 year, genetic gain per year is 0.346 head when genomic information is used. It is 0.128 when BLUP is used.CONCLUSIONGenetic gain estimated from single step best linear unbiased prediction (ssBLUP) method is by 2.7 times higher than that the one estimated from BLUP method, i.e., 270% more improvement in efficiency.
This study was to determine the relationship between estimated breeding value and phenotype information after farrowing when juvenile selection was made in candidate pigs without phenotype information. After collecting phenotypic and genomic information for the total number of piglets born by Landrace pigs, selection accuracy between genomic breeding value estimates using genomic information and breeding value estimates of best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) using conventional pedigree information were compared. Genetic standard deviation ( ) for the total number of piglets born was 0.91. Since the total number of piglets born for candidate pigs was unknown, the accuracy of the breeding value estimated from pedigree information was 0.080. When genomic information was used, the accuracy of the breeding value was 0.216. Assuming that the replacement rate of sows per year is 100% and generation interval is 1 year, genetic gain per year is 0.346 head when genomic information is used. It is 0.128 when BLUP is used. Genetic gain estimated from single step best linear unbiased prediction (ssBLUP) method is by 2.7 times higher than that the one estimated from BLUP method, i.e., 270% more improvement in efficiency.
Objective: This study was to determine the relationship between estimated breeding value and phenotype information after farrowing when juvenile selection was made in candidate pigs without phenotype information. Methods: After collecting phenotypic and genomic information for the total number of piglets born by Landrace pigs, selection accuracy between genomic breeding value estimates using genomic information and breeding value estimates of best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) using conventional pedigree information were compared. Results: Genetic standard deviation (σa) for the total number of piglets born was 0.91. Since the total number of piglets born for candidate pigs was unknown, the accuracy of the breeding value estimated from pedigree information was 0.080. When genomic information was used, the accuracy of the breeding value was 0.216. Assuming that the replacement rate of sows per year is 100% and generation interval is 1 year, genetic gain per year is 0.346 head when genomic information is used. It is 0.128 when BLUP is used. Conclusion: Genetic gain estimated from single step best linear unbiased prediction (ssBLUP) method is by 2.7 times higher than that the one estimated from BLUP method, i.e., 270% more improvement in efficiency. KCI Citation Count: 2
Objective: This study was to determine the relationship between estimated breeding value and phenotype information after farrowing when juvenile selection was made in candidate pigs without phenotype information. Methods: After collecting phenotypic and genomic information for the total number of piglets born by Landrace pigs, selection accuracy between genomic breeding value estimates using genomic information and breeding value estimates of best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) using conventional pedigree information were compared. Results: Genetic standard deviation ([[sigma].sub.a]) for the total number of piglets born was 0.91. Since the total number of piglets born for candidate pigs was unknown, the accuracy of the breeding value estimated from pedigree information was 0.080. When genomic information was used, the accuracy of the breeding value was 0.216. Assuming that the replacement rate of sows per year is 100% and generation interval is 1 year, genetic gain per year is 0.346 head when genomic information is used. It is 0.128 when BLUP is used. Conclusion: Genetic gain estimated from single step best linear unbiased prediction (ssBLUP) method is by 2.7 times higher than that the one estimated from BLUP method, i.e., 270% more improvement in efficiency. Keywords: Genomic Selection, Total Number of Piglets Born, Landrace
Objective This study was to determine the relationship between estimated breeding value and phenotype information after farrowing when juvenile selection was made in candidate pigs without phenotype information. Methods After collecting phenotypic and genomic information for the total number of piglets born by Landrace pigs, selection accuracy between genomic breeding value estimates using genomic information and breeding value estimates of best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) using conventional pedigree information were compared. Results Genetic standard deviation (σa) for the total number of piglets born was 0.91. Since the total number of piglets born for candidate pigs was unknown, the accuracy of the breeding value estimated from pedigree information was 0.080. When genomic information was used, the accuracy of the breeding value was 0.216. Assuming that the replacement rate of sows per year is 100% and generation interval is 1 year, genetic gain per year is 0.346 head when genomic information is used. It is 0.128 when BLUP is used. Conclusion Genetic gain estimated from single step best linear unbiased prediction (ssBLUP) method is by 2.7 times higher than that the one estimated from BLUP method, i.e., 270% more improvement in efficiency.
Audience Academic
Author Park, Kyung-Do
Oh, Jae-Don
AuthorAffiliation 1 Department of Animal Biotechnology, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Department of Animal Biotechnology, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Jae-Don
  surname: Oh
  fullname: Oh, Jae-Don
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Kyung-Do
  surname: Park
  fullname: Park, Kyung-Do
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27507181$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002192781$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNptks1rFDEchgep2A-9eZYcFbprvj8uwlKsLiwIUr2GJJOZZjubrMmM0P_ezG6tVmQOmSTP75mX4T1vTmKKvmleI7hkApH3ZmvKEvElJIo-a86QEnzBGBIn9R0itMCEi9PmvJQthIxiIV80p1gwKJBEZ038bobQmjGkCFIHih-8O2yMc1M27h50KYPx1oMxjWYAcdpZn2d0H_rBjwXYlCMIEWxMbOuAny8KmEqIPeh9TLvg_mhfNs87MxT_6mG9aL5df7y5-rzYfPm0vlptFo5hMi6oxIIIJFrpOKEGWmiVbDGTnENqMRfeYypUazvOkIJIWUQdbjmmRDDuBLlo3h29MXf6zgWdTDisfdJ3Wa--3qw1Iqj6WGXXR7ZNZqv3OexMvj8MHA5S7rXJY3CD115iUmNA7hGmlhrJCYSO2VYJbxHh1fXh6NpPdudb5-OYzfBE-vQmhtua6admGDKmVBW8fRDk9GPyZdS7UJwfBhN9mopGkjGCJWLzt5ZHtDc1WohdqkZXn9bXf15L0oV6vqJKICUpxXXgzd_hHlP9bkMFLo-Ay6mU7LtHBEE9l03PZdOI67lsFcf_4C6MhyrVIGH4_9AvxvDXPg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jia_2023_07_033
crossref_primary_10_3389_fgene_2024_1526473
crossref_primary_10_1111_jbg_12515
crossref_primary_10_3168_jds_2018_15191
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2017 Asian - Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies
Copyright © 2017 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2017
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2017 Asian - Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies
– notice: Copyright © 2017 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 2017
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
ACYCR
DOI 10.5713/ajas.16.0394
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed



Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Agriculture
EISSN 1976-5517
2765-0235
EndPage 153
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1318665
oai_doaj_org_article_e823d2506e124b4a86300c5bd97eb136
PMC5205599
A497198442
27507181
10_5713_ajas_16_0394
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID 23N
2XV
5GY
9ZL
AAFWJ
AAYXX
ABDBF
ACUHS
ACYCR
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AENEX
AFPKN
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
BCNDV
CITATION
DIK
EBS
EJD
GJPHO
GROUPED_DOAJ
HYE
IAG
IAO
IPNFZ
ITC
JDI
KQ8
M48
OK1
P2P
PGMZT
PV9
RIG
RPM
RZL
SJN
~KM
KVFHK
NPM
7X8
5PM
EYRJQ
ICW
IGS
ISR
N95
XI7
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c523t-48273717d8c634a0b0b98d2586604b267ee2479dbf6519019b14c2d6243756c73
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1011-2367
2765-0189
IngestDate Tue Jun 25 21:09:57 EDT 2024
Wed Aug 27 01:25:39 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:03:02 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 14:21:16 EDT 2025
Sat Mar 08 18:31:50 EST 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:02:00 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:08:52 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:00:53 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Landrace
Genomic Selection
Total Number of Piglets Born
Language English
License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c523t-48273717d8c634a0b0b98d2586604b267ee2479dbf6519019b14c2d6243756c73
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
These authors contributed equally to this work.
G704-001112.2017.30.2.015
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.5713/ajas.16.0394
PMID 27507181
PQID 1855328156
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1318665
doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_e823d2506e124b4a86300c5bd97eb136
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5205599
proquest_miscellaneous_1855328156
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A497198442
pubmed_primary_27507181
crossref_primary_10_5713_ajas_16_0394
crossref_citationtrail_10_5713_ajas_16_0394
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Korea (South)
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Korea (South)
PublicationTitle Animal bioscience
PublicationTitleAlternate Asian-Australas J Anim Sci
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher Asian - Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies
아세아·태평양축산학회
Publisher_xml – name: Asian - Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies
– name: Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)
– name: Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies
– name: 아세아·태평양축산학회
References Forni (ref13) 2011
VanRaden (ref5) 2008
Misztal (ref6) 2009
Lee (ref11) 2015
Meuwissen (ref3) 2001
Arango (ref12) 2005
Gengler (ref4) 2008
VanRaden (ref1) 2009
Christensen (ref2) 2012
Chen (ref10) 2003
Su (ref9) 2007
Christensen (ref8) 2010
Liu (ref7) 2014
18946147 - J Dairy Sci. 2008 Nov;91(11):4414-23
21208445 - Genet Sel Evol. 2011 Jan 05;43:1
18349258 - J Dairy Sci. 2008 Apr;91(4):1652-9
22717310 - Animal. 2012 Oct;6(10):1565-71
15705745 - J Anim Sci. 2005 Mar;83(3):499-506
20105297 - Genet Sel Evol. 2010 Jan 27;42:2
12597371 - J Anim Sci. 2003 Jan;81(1):46-53
25022678 - J Dairy Sci. 2014 Sep;97(9):5833-50
11290733 - Genetics. 2001 Apr;157(4):1819-29
19700729 - J Dairy Sci. 2009 Sep;92(9):4656-63
19109259 - J Dairy Sci. 2009 Jan;92(1):16-24
26323395 - Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2015 Oct;28(10):1388-93
17339413 - J Anim Sci. 2007 Jun;85(6):1385-92
References_xml – start-page: 1385
  volume-title: Selection for litter size at day five to improve litter size at weaning and piglet survival rate
  year: 2007
  ident: ref9
– start-page: 1819
  volume-title: Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps
  year: 2001
  ident: ref3
– start-page: 1
  volume-title: Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped
  year: 2010
  ident: ref8
– start-page: 1565
  volume-title: Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs
  year: 2012
  ident: ref2
– start-page: 499
  volume-title: Threshold-linear estimation of genetic parameters for farrowing mortality, litter size, and test performance of Large White sows
  year: 2005
  ident: ref12
– start-page: 4656
  volume-title: A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information
  year: 2009
  ident: ref6
– start-page: 46
  volume-title: Genetic parameters and trends for litter traits in U.S. Yorkshire, Duroc, Hampshire, and Landrace pigs
  year: 2003
  ident: ref10
– start-page: 1
  volume-title: Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information
  year: 2011
  ident: ref13
– start-page: 1652
  volume-title: Accuracy of prediction of gene content in large animal populations and its use for candidate gene detection and genetic evaluation
  year: 2008
  ident: ref4
– start-page: 1388
  volume-title: Genetic parameters of reproductive and meat quality traits in Korean Berkshire pigs
  year: 2015
  ident: ref11
– start-page: 16
  volume-title: Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls
  year: 2009
  ident: ref1
– start-page: 4414
  volume-title: Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions
  year: 2008
  ident: ref5
– start-page: 5833
  volume-title: A single-step genomic model with direct estimation of marker effects
  year: 2014
  ident: ref7
– reference: 25022678 - J Dairy Sci. 2014 Sep;97(9):5833-50
– reference: 26323395 - Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2015 Oct;28(10):1388-93
– reference: 15705745 - J Anim Sci. 2005 Mar;83(3):499-506
– reference: 17339413 - J Anim Sci. 2007 Jun;85(6):1385-92
– reference: 18946147 - J Dairy Sci. 2008 Nov;91(11):4414-23
– reference: 22717310 - Animal. 2012 Oct;6(10):1565-71
– reference: 18349258 - J Dairy Sci. 2008 Apr;91(4):1652-9
– reference: 19700729 - J Dairy Sci. 2009 Sep;92(9):4656-63
– reference: 20105297 - Genet Sel Evol. 2010 Jan 27;42:2
– reference: 12597371 - J Anim Sci. 2003 Jan;81(1):46-53
– reference: 19109259 - J Dairy Sci. 2009 Jan;92(1):16-24
– reference: 11290733 - Genetics. 2001 Apr;157(4):1819-29
– reference: 21208445 - Genet Sel Evol. 2011 Jan 05;43:1
SSID ssj0054278
ssib044729589
ssj0002513319
ssib053376655
Score 2.1045856
Snippet This study was to determine the relationship between estimated breeding value and phenotype information after farrowing when juvenile selection was made in...
Objective: This study was to determine the relationship between estimated breeding value and phenotype information after farrowing when juvenile selection was...
OBJECTIVEThis study was to determine the relationship between estimated breeding value and phenotype information after farrowing when juvenile selection was...
Objective This study was to determine the relationship between estimated breeding value and phenotype information after farrowing when juvenile selection was...
SourceID nrf
doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 149
SubjectTerms Genetic aspects
Genomic Selection
Growth
Landrace
Observations
Phenotypes
Swine
Total Number of Piglets Born
축산학
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrZ3db9MwEMAt2BM8oI3PDDYZBOIBZXP8mTx2iGkg4ImhvVmO45QwcKa0feC_585Jy4pAvPBUtXEb5-7su5OvvyPkOQsiYbRybRgmKMrnVclN7pUKGjvDNqna_cNHfXYu312oi2utvrAmbMQDj4I7DiUXDfhpHcAT1dKVyIjyqm4qA9uMSLBtcGPrZGrcgxU2kEjnnEWRI6NsLHlXkJEdu69ucVToIyYqueWMErN_szPfjEP7p6jz9-LJa97odJfcmcJIOhunv0duhHiX3J7NhwmlEe6R-BlC7LFjEu1bukgNb_CN8341OP-DQrxKIf6jyx4icDr2BsGhV90ctLmgYB6RdpG-d7GBLwS8sKBYKT-nyHb93vlfP3ufnJ---fT6LJ-6K4AeuFjmyP8UkMw1pddCOlazuipB0qXWTNZcmxC4NFVTt1ph1FDVhfS80UgwVNob8YDsxD6GR4SaIEzJWgmpnJasUTWeVroqcB9gUbdFRl6txWz9hB7HDhjfLKQgqBSLSrGFtqiUjLzYjL4akRt_GXeCGtuMQVB2-gDMx07mY_9lPhl5ifq2uJxhSt5N_0qAB0Mwlp3JyhRVKSXPyDMwCXvpu3QnfJ339nKwkHi8tYVI5MCMPF1bjIV1iocvLoZ-BZMulRIc2TwZeTha0GbmyNiHGAHkZLZsa-vRtq_E7ktigSvOkBm3_z9k8Zjc4hi0pJr0J2RnOazCAYRcy_owra6fPwwlZQ
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Validation of selection accuracy for the total number of piglets born in Landrace pigs using genomic selection
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27507181
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1855328156
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5205599
https://doaj.org/article/e823d2506e124b4a86300c5bd97eb136
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART002192781
Volume 30
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Animal Bioscience, 2017, 30(2), , pp.149-153
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAFT
  databaseName: Open Access Digital Library
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1976-5517
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0054278
  issn: 1011-2367
  databaseCode: KQ8
  dateStart: 20120101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html
  providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
– providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1976-5517
  dateEnd: 20201231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0054278
  issn: 1011-2367
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 19880101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1976-5517
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0002513319
  issn: 1011-2367
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20140101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVEBS
  databaseName: EBSCOhost Academic Search Ultimate
  customDbUrl: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s3936755&profile=ehost&defaultdb=asn
  eissn: 1976-5517
  dateEnd: 20201231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0054278
  issn: 1011-2367
  databaseCode: ABDBF
  dateStart: 20130801
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.ebscohost.com/direct.asp?db=asn
  providerName: EBSCOhost
– providerCode: PRVBFR
  databaseName: Free Medical Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1976-5517
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0054278
  issn: 1011-2367
  databaseCode: DIK
  dateStart: 19880101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://www.freemedicaljournals.com
  providerName: Flying Publisher
– providerCode: PRVHPJ
  databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1976-5517
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssib044729589
  issn: 1011-2367
  databaseCode: M~E
  dateStart: 19880101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org
  providerName: ISSN International Centre
– providerCode: PRVAQN
  databaseName: PubMed Central
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1976-5517
  dateEnd: 20201231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0054278
  issn: 1011-2367
  databaseCode: RPM
  dateStart: 20120101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
  providerName: National Library of Medicine
– providerCode: PRVFZP
  databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1976-5517
  dateEnd: 20201231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0054278
  issn: 1011-2367
  databaseCode: M48
  dateStart: 20120101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://journals.scholarsportal.info
  providerName: Scholars Portal
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Lb9NAEF615QIHxBvziBYE4oAc7H3aJxRQqxZUTgT1trLXa2Na7GInEr3w25lZO4ZAkbgkir1OdndmvN94J99HyLPIcU-jFSodYYIibZgmTIdWSqdQGbbw1e7HH9ThUrw7kSc7ZKM2Ok5gf2lqh3pSy-5s_v3bxWsIeMCvcwk51qvsS9bPYzWPeCp2yRVYkxj697GY9hMkCkr4fc84DpGzbCiB_-vqrcXJc_hPd-rdpisvQ6F_FlP-tjod3CDXR1hJF4Mf3CQ7rrlFri2qbqTWcLdJ8wkg96CgRNuS9l4ABz9k1q67zF5QwK8U8CBdtTAZdNAKwabndQXW7Sm4S0PrhmIxJFzg8ERPsXK-osj1-rW2v772Dlke7H98exiOagtgF8ZXIfKBckjuisQqLrIoj_I0KZhMlIpEzpR2jgmdFnmpJKKINI-FZYVCRkOprOZ3yV7TNu4-odpxnUSlgNROiaiQOe5eZqlj1kGQl3FAXm6m2diRihwVMc4MpCRoFINGMbEyaJSAPJ9anw8UHP9o9wYtNrVB4mx_oO0qM8ahcQnjMKhIOQA2ucgSpByzMi9SDasWVwF5gfY26HDQJZuN_1KAgSFRllmIVMdpIgQLyFNwCXNqa_9L-F615rQzkIgcmZh7JsGAPNl4jIG4xc2YrHHtGjqdSMkZcvUE5N7gQVPPkXMfMAPMk97yra2hbZ9p6s-eG1yyCDnkHvz3MB6SqwyRii9Ef0T2Vt3aPQactcpnkGEcvZ_5pxQzH074-mP_J8EcJ58
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation+of+selection+accuracy+for+the+total+number+of+piglets+born+in+landrace+pigs+using+genomic+selection&rft.jtitle=Asian-australasian+journal+of+animal+sciences&rft.au=Oh%2C+Jae-Don&rft.au=Na%2C+Chong-Sam&rft.au=Park%2C+Kyung-Do&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.pub=Asian+-+Australasian+Association+of+Animal+Production+Societies&rft.issn=1011-2367&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=149&rft_id=info:doi/10.5713%2Fajas.16.0394&rft.externalDocID=A497198442
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1011-2367&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1011-2367&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1011-2367&client=summon