Recollection and familiarity: Examining controversial assumptions and new directions
It is well accepted that recognition memory reflects the contribution of two separable memory retrieval processes, namely recollection and familiarity. However, fundamental questions remain regarding the functional nature and neural substrates of these processes. In this article, we describe a simpl...
Saved in:
| Published in | Hippocampus Vol. 20; no. 11; pp. 1178 - 1194 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Hoboken
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
01.11.2010
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1050-9631 1098-1063 1098-1063 |
| DOI | 10.1002/hipo.20864 |
Cover
| Abstract | It is well accepted that recognition memory reflects the contribution of two separable memory retrieval processes, namely recollection and familiarity. However, fundamental questions remain regarding the functional nature and neural substrates of these processes. In this article, we describe a simple quantitative model of recognition memory (i.e., the dual‐process signal detection model) that has been useful in integrating findings from a broad range of cognitive studies, and that is now being applied in a growing number of neuroscientific investigations of memory. The model makes several strong assumptions about the behavioral nature and neural substrates of recollection and familiarity. A review of the literature indicates that these assumptions are generally well supported, but that there are clear boundary conditions in which these assumptions break down. We argue that these findings provide important insights into the operation of the processes underlying recognition. Finally, we consider how the dual‐process approach relates to recent neuroanatomical and computational models and how it might be integrated with recent findings concerning the role of medial temporal lobe regions in other cognitive functions such as novelty detection, perception, implicit memory and short‐term memory. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | It is well accepted that recognition memory reflects the contribution of two separable memory retrieval processes, namely recollection and familiarity. However, fundamental questions remain regarding the functional nature and neural substrates of these processes. In this article, we describe a simple quantitative model of recognition memory (i.e., the dual-process signal detection model) that has been useful in integrating findings from a broad range of cognitive studies, and that is now being applied in a growing number of neuroscientific investigations of memory. The model makes several strong assumptions about the behavioral nature and neural substrates of recollection and familiarity. A review of the literature indicates that these assumptions are generally well supported, but that there are clear boundary conditions in which these assumptions break down. We argue that these findings provide important insights into the operation of the processes underlying recognition. Finally, we consider how the dual-process approach relates to recent neuroanatomical and computational models and how it might be integrated with recent findings concerning the role of medial temporal lobe regions in other cognitive functions such as novelty detection, perception, implicit memory and short-term memory. It is well accepted that recognition memory reflects the contribution of two separable memory retrieval processes, namely recollection and familiarity. However, fundamental questions remain regarding the functional nature and neural substrates of these processes. In this article, we describe a simple quantitative model of recognition memory (i.e., the dual-process signal detection model) that has been useful in integrating findings from a broad range of cognitive studies, and that is now being applied in a growing number of neuroscientific investigations of memory. The model makes several strong assumptions about the behavioral nature and neural substrates of recollection and familiarity. A review of the literature indicates that these assumptions are generally well supported, but that there are clear boundary conditions in which these assumptions break down. We argue that these findings provide important insights into the operation of the processes underlying recognition. Finally, we consider how the dual-process approach relates to recent neuroanatomical and computational models and how it might be integrated with recent findings concerning the role of medial temporal lobe regions in other cognitive functions such as novelty detection, perception, implicit memory and short-term memory.It is well accepted that recognition memory reflects the contribution of two separable memory retrieval processes, namely recollection and familiarity. However, fundamental questions remain regarding the functional nature and neural substrates of these processes. In this article, we describe a simple quantitative model of recognition memory (i.e., the dual-process signal detection model) that has been useful in integrating findings from a broad range of cognitive studies, and that is now being applied in a growing number of neuroscientific investigations of memory. The model makes several strong assumptions about the behavioral nature and neural substrates of recollection and familiarity. A review of the literature indicates that these assumptions are generally well supported, but that there are clear boundary conditions in which these assumptions break down. We argue that these findings provide important insights into the operation of the processes underlying recognition. Finally, we consider how the dual-process approach relates to recent neuroanatomical and computational models and how it might be integrated with recent findings concerning the role of medial temporal lobe regions in other cognitive functions such as novelty detection, perception, implicit memory and short-term memory. It is well accepted that recognition memory reflects the contribution of two separable memory retrieval processes, namely recollection and familiarity. However, fundamental questions remain regarding the functional nature and neural substrates of these processes. In this article, we describe a simple quantitative model of recognition memory (i.e., the dual‐process signal detection model) that has been useful in integrating findings from a broad range of cognitive studies, and that is now being applied in a growing number of neuroscientific investigations of memory. The model makes several strong assumptions about the behavioral nature and neural substrates of recollection and familiarity. A review of the literature indicates that these assumptions are generally well supported, but that there are clear boundary conditions in which these assumptions break down. We argue that these findings provide important insights into the operation of the processes underlying recognition. Finally, we consider how the dual‐process approach relates to recent neuroanatomical and computational models and how it might be integrated with recent findings concerning the role of medial temporal lobe regions in other cognitive functions such as novelty detection, perception, implicit memory and short‐term memory. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
| Author | Koen, Joshua D. Wang, Wei-Chun Aly, Mariam Yonelinas, Andrew P. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Andrew P. surname: Yonelinas fullname: Yonelinas, Andrew P. email: apyonelinas@ucdavis.edu organization: Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, California – sequence: 2 givenname: Mariam surname: Aly fullname: Aly, Mariam organization: Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, California – sequence: 3 givenname: Wei-Chun surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Wei-Chun organization: Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, California – sequence: 4 givenname: Joshua D. surname: Koen fullname: Koen, Joshua D. organization: Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, California |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20848606$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9kV1rFTEQhoNU-mVv_AGyd4KwdfKd9UKQUttCsUUr5zJkd7NtNJsckz1tz793t9tTVKRXScjzvDPM7KGtEINF6DWGQwxA3t-4ZTwkoAR7gXYxVKrEIOjWdOdQVoLiHbSX8w8AjDnANtoZYaYEiF109dU20XvbDC6GwoS26EzvvDPJDesPxfH9-AouXBdNDEOKtzZlZ3xhcl71y8nJD1Kwd0Xr0hyTX6GXnfHZHjye--j75-Oro9Py_OLk7OjTedlwQllJhCDGdoRwxYARRmXdgVAgSGXrmoGUjIE1RtK2lVCzhqqOdx3GWACuCdB99HHOXa7q3raNHVs0Xi-T601a62ic_vsnuBt9HW81IxwrycaAt48BKf5a2Tzo3uXGem-CjausJVeKcimrkXzzZ6mnGptJjgDMQJNizsl2unGDmcYxVnZeY9DTsvS0LP2wrFF594-ySf0vjGf4znm7fobUp2eXFxunnB2XB3v_5Jj0UwtJJdeLLyeaAq4W1QL0N_obqVS1Vw |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1080_09658211_2017_1381745 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2020_606046 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2013_02_017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_physbeh_2023_114225 crossref_primary_10_1080_13506285_2025_2470384 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2012_06_019 crossref_primary_10_1080_13825585_2017_1358351 crossref_primary_10_1093_cercor_bhz071 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brs_2019_12_019 crossref_primary_10_1111_psyp_14161 crossref_primary_10_1177_1747021820906117 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bandc_2014_09_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2016_06_025 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2019_116475 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_appet_2022_106074 crossref_primary_10_1002_hipo_23063 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2011_12_013 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41593_024_01771_8 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13420_023_00616_x crossref_primary_10_3389_fnbeh_2020_539725 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cortex_2017_06_007 crossref_primary_10_1177_0031512517751725 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_00086 crossref_primary_10_1101_lm_047498_118 crossref_primary_10_1097_WNR_0000000000001735 crossref_primary_10_1002_hipo_22531 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_021_01937_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bandc_2013_07_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pbb_2025_173986 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jneuroling_2021_101018 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_00881 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cortex_2013_06_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2019_107328 crossref_primary_10_1080_23279095_2022_2104162 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0142716423000140 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11055_022_01251_1 crossref_primary_10_1075_jpcl_00135_pre crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_22702 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cortex_2018_08_011 crossref_primary_10_3917_rne_032_0083 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2025_109120 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00426_023_01850_8 crossref_primary_10_1080_02791072_2023_2230568 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2012_07_038 crossref_primary_10_1002_hipo_22682 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brainres_2022_148200 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpsycho_2016_06_014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nlm_2020_107353 crossref_primary_10_1024_1016_264X_a000337 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13421_024_01592_x crossref_primary_10_1002_wcs_1698 crossref_primary_10_3724_SP_J_1042_2019_00490 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tics_2015_02_009 crossref_primary_10_1123_jsep_2016_0254 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_concog_2013_05_006 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci6040063 crossref_primary_10_1038_srep13158 crossref_primary_10_1038_npp_2014_122 crossref_primary_10_1080_23279095_2022_2135441 crossref_primary_10_1155_2019_7146168 crossref_primary_10_1080_09658211_2018_1495236 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neubiorev_2017_10_017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2022_119098 crossref_primary_10_7554_eLife_52059 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2012_06_004 crossref_primary_10_1152_physrev_00032_2012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_concog_2012_04_014 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0188727 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13428_024_02345_z crossref_primary_10_3758_s13415_015_0392_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yhbeh_2011_08_014 crossref_primary_10_1101_lm_2214511 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jecp_2014_11_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpsychires_2021_12_026 crossref_primary_10_1101_lm_2197211 crossref_primary_10_1038_npp_2014_134 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_58076_6 crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_26406 crossref_primary_10_1109_TSMC_2021_3102834 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_celrep_2024_114276 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_exger_2020_111195 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neubiorev_2021_03_007 crossref_primary_10_1101_lm_053558_121 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13415_024_01170_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2021_08_013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2012_10_018 crossref_primary_10_1111_ejn_13938 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2017_00709 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13421_024_01655_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s10339_024_01230_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neubiorev_2023_105188 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0142716422000364 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13423_023_02309_y crossref_primary_10_3758_s13420_020_00432_7 crossref_primary_10_1523_ENEURO_0073_24_2024 crossref_primary_10_1002_hipo_22345 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brainres_2014_07_025 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2013_07_039 crossref_primary_10_1080_0361073X_2019_1664442 crossref_primary_10_1080_17470218_2014_976579 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2019_02997 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyt_2023_1242822 crossref_primary_10_1080_13803395_2020_1801598 crossref_primary_10_1080_10400419_2025_2461823 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2014_09_025 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_01249 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2020_107394 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nlm_2015_02_012 crossref_primary_10_3390_jintelligence10040101 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12671_016_0627_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neucom_2021_09_012 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_021_01684_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2021_117820 crossref_primary_10_1080_09658211_2016_1177089 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_00839 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0030231 crossref_primary_10_1093_texcom_tgac038 crossref_primary_10_3917_anpsy1_193_0397 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13421_023_01499_z crossref_primary_10_3758_s13423_012_0298_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2012_07_047 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_01131 crossref_primary_10_1111_nyas_14750 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1551_6709_2011_01214_x crossref_primary_10_1101_lm_053553_121 crossref_primary_10_1111_bjdp_12468 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnint_2014_00086 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13421_025_01688_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2018_07_035 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2013_07_012 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_54074_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropharm_2023_109464 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_01014 crossref_primary_10_1111_sjop_12245 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nlm_2022_107655 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2014_03_007 crossref_primary_10_1111_sjop_12807 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13414_013_0585_z crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1518931113 crossref_primary_10_1080_23279095_2024_2419321 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_01937 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbr_2011_07_043 crossref_primary_10_1080_13825585_2021_1881037 crossref_primary_10_1177_1747021819893676 crossref_primary_10_1080_09658211_2022_2027986 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2017_11_004 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13423_012_0340_9 crossref_primary_10_1002_hipo_22369 crossref_primary_10_1002_hipo_22249 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tics_2011_03_005 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0143767 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2014_09_046 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cortex_2012_11_017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brainres_2020_147077 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00429_022_02603_w crossref_primary_10_3758_s13414_017_1314_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbr_2013_05_030 crossref_primary_10_1167_jov_22_11_9 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2017_00125 crossref_primary_10_3917_rne_073_0177 crossref_primary_10_1002_hipo_20857 crossref_primary_10_1080_09658211_2021_1974049 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci12070843 crossref_primary_10_1101_lm_053610_122 crossref_primary_10_1111_mila_12362 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2019_03_019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bandc_2019_103584 crossref_primary_10_1111_ejn_14935 crossref_primary_10_3390_vision6030048 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nlm_2012_01_006 crossref_primary_10_1080_17470218_2016_1255768 crossref_primary_10_1002_hipo_22110 crossref_primary_10_1002_hipo_20851 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2016_07_010 crossref_primary_10_1111_psyp_14152 crossref_primary_10_1080_09658211_2014_988162 crossref_primary_10_1080_09658211_2023_2280498 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brainres_2015_01_033 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biopsycho_2023_108657 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_57668_w crossref_primary_10_1007_s00426_024_02003_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2020_107623 crossref_primary_10_1101_lm_051342_120 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2012_01_127 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jml_2022_104366 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnsys_2023_1103770 crossref_primary_10_1097_WNR_0b013e328362e47e crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actpsy_2019_102933 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isci_2024_111439 crossref_primary_10_1080_13825585_2020_1736497 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00737_024_01503_8 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13415_020_00854_w crossref_primary_10_3758_s13428_016_0796_z crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci13040553 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_018_03679_x crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_02094 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00426_024_01994_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2022_108287 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_019_05534_x crossref_primary_10_1080_00207144_2021_1910827 crossref_primary_10_1002_wcs_1638 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1748_6653_2011_02019_x crossref_primary_10_1177_00315125231163626 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neubiorev_2022_104685 crossref_primary_10_1093_brain_awt159 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2019_107295 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2015_00454 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actpsy_2025_104901 crossref_primary_10_1044_nnsld24_2_50 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00426_015_0697_2 crossref_primary_10_3917_rne_032_0112 crossref_primary_10_1002_hipo_23588 crossref_primary_10_1093_cercor_bhu333 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jad_2022_01_009 crossref_primary_10_1111_psyp_14334 crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_354703 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2019_107298 crossref_primary_10_1108_JAT_04_2015_0011 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10803_022_05579_y crossref_primary_10_1101_lm_047167_117 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_01697 crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_5126_11_2012 crossref_primary_10_1093_braincomms_fcad146 crossref_primary_10_1093_texcom_tgac009 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13423_024_02472_w crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_018_08080_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2020_107527 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2025_1507782 crossref_primary_10_1080_09658211_2023_2191901 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0167396 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00429_015_1084_x crossref_primary_10_1177_1754073919892069 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13423_022_02182_1 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_04997_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00424_015_1782_5 crossref_primary_10_1101_lm_053432_121 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyt_2017_00181 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2024_105974 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpsychires_2015_09_015 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00426_021_01572_9 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13415_014_0310_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bpsc_2019_03_004 crossref_primary_10_1080_17588928_2018_1484723 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brainres_2017_03_031 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijpsycho_2019_10_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurobiolaging_2018_09_021 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbr_2013_06_009 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13421_012_0205_5 crossref_primary_10_1093_brain_awab406 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13421_018_0819_3 crossref_primary_10_1080_13825585_2016_1263725 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13428_021_01604_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_dcn_2021_100932 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nlm_2013_10_008 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0115624 crossref_primary_10_1523_JNEUROSCI_2075_12_2013 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bandc_2018_11_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurobiolaging_2021_02_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jml_2021_104264 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2012_12_012 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13415_024_01234_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11065_014_9266_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2017_01_062 crossref_primary_10_1523_ENEURO_0062_22_2022 crossref_primary_10_1080_13803395_2019_1697210 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbr_2014_02_050 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neubiorev_2019_11_005 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2020_01276 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_00587 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_022_03940_z crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_85627_2 crossref_primary_10_1080_20445911_2015_1033422 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurobiolaging_2023_04_009 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pbio_3002706 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13421_021_01213_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2021_104905 crossref_primary_10_1111_sjop_13042 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cortex_2014_07_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2019_104168 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nlm_2014_02_013 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1304739110 crossref_primary_10_1007_s41465_018_0099_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jml_2024_104536 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cognition_2018_05_021 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jml_2016_12_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2015_06_069 crossref_primary_10_1080_13803395_2016_1210573 crossref_primary_10_1111_psyp_13446 crossref_primary_10_1080_00221309_2023_2252133 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2014_00328 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_psych_120710_100344 crossref_primary_10_3724_SP_J_1042_2018_01775 crossref_primary_10_1002_hbm_22627 crossref_primary_10_1111_jnp_12154 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2012_07_030 crossref_primary_10_1038_s44271_023_00002_3 crossref_primary_10_1080_20445911_2021_1894157 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psyneuen_2024_107218 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_01411 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actpsy_2021_103306 crossref_primary_10_1093_bja_aew473 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_016_4859_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neubiorev_2023_105347 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11229_022_03635_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neubiorev_2023_105467 crossref_primary_10_1002_hipo_22087 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13421_024_01659_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbr_2020_112976 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00213_011_2536_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neubiorev_2021_09_033 crossref_primary_10_1111_psyp_14304 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnbeh_2015_00248 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2013_11_025 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10339_019_00943_w crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_32244_w crossref_primary_10_1101_lm_042622_116 crossref_primary_10_1111_psyp_14662 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_brainres_2024_149022 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13414_018_1522_y crossref_primary_10_1080_09658211_2022_2156546 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2021_623402 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13420_024_00630_7 crossref_primary_10_1080_09658211_2018_1511808 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2020_107339 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2020_107338 crossref_primary_10_3724_SP_J_1041_2020_00562 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2016_06_013 crossref_primary_10_1162_jocn_a_01627 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0130403 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnagi_2024_1389957 crossref_primary_10_1080_23311908_2021_1982470 crossref_primary_10_1111_cdev_12323 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2014_06_006 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13415_024_01251_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurobiolaging_2021_06_021 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurobiolaging_2021_12_011 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10071_019_01246_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actpsy_2020_103156 crossref_primary_10_1017_langcog_2016_13 crossref_primary_10_1002_pchj_457 crossref_primary_10_1080_17588928_2018_1504764 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2023_108780 crossref_primary_10_1080_02699931_2024_2418444 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2023_108782 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2019_01379 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neubiorev_2021_04_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2017_07_032 crossref_primary_10_1080_0952813X_2012_741624 crossref_primary_10_1080_09658211_2024_2314516 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_concog_2016_05_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tins_2015_10_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbr_2022_114057 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuropsychologia_2023_108777 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_concog_2018_10_003 crossref_primary_10_3758_s13421_020_01105_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tins_2011_06_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuron_2013_04_018 crossref_primary_10_3390_molecules26113326 crossref_primary_10_1080_17470218_2016_1220607 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00221_022_06467_8 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci10020102 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12144_019_00449_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2012_04_031 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1017/S0140525X99002034 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070866 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.022 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.013 10.1002/hipo.10085 10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00099-8 10.1038/nn2016 10.1162/089892904322755511 10.1037/0278-7393.26.2.294 10.1002/hipo.20427 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01851.x 10.1002/hipo.20226 10.1006/brcg.1997.0902 10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094328 10.1073/pnas.0409848102 10.1101/lm.251906 10.1093/cercor/bhm104 10.1098/rstb.2001.0939 10.1037/0278-7393.27.3.701 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.03.025 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.038 10.1080/14640747808400681 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.035 10.1073/pnas.0705273104 10.1002/hipo.20053 10.1037/h0080017 10.1016/0028-3932(89)90184-X 10.1002/hipo.20320 10.1101/lm.51802 10.3758/BF03196125 10.1002/hipo.20101 10.1080/02643290125897 10.1017/S1355617700000655 10.1162/08989290051137468 10.1073/pnas.0602716103 10.3758/BF03200940 10.1101/lm.258406 10.1037/0735-7044.111.4.667 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.05.014 10.1037/0735-7044.117.3.526 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.12.020 10.1038/nn961 10.1126/science.277.5324.376 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.015 10.1073/pnas.0912543107 10.1037/0894-4105.7.1.5 10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.800 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.09.008 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.10.003 10.1073/pnas.0812097106 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90025-F 10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.588 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.10.011 10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.699 10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.252 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.09.001 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.08.025 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.07.006 10.1162/jocn.2009.21335 10.3758/BF03196778 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.003 10.1002/hipo.20608 10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.001 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.10.005 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3456-08.2008 10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1341 10.1037/0894-4105.11.3.331 10.1002/hipo.20046 10.1162/08989290151137403 10.1080/13554790490507650 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.01.001 10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.003 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02324.x 10.1037/0033-295X.110.4.611 10.1002/hipo.20257 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.03.007 10.1006/brcg.1997.0873 10.1002/hipo.1111 10.1006/jmla.2002.2864 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.03.004 10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.004 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04033.x 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.07.035 10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.730 10.3758/BF03212975 10.1002/hipo.20515 10.1038/nature02853 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.003 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01147-9 10.1016/0028-3932(90)90004-8 10.1177/1073858407299290 10.1097/01.wco.0000168080.99730.1c 10.1037/0278-7393.25.6.1415 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5295-04.2005 10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.331 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00598.x 10.3758/BF03210977 10.1002/hipo.20326 10.1006/jmla.1996.0018 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2877-06.2006 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1392-05.2005 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.152 10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.752 10.1162/0898929041502751 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5222-05.2006 10.1006/jmla.1995.1028 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1999)9:5<495::AID-HIPO2>3.0.CO;2-O 10.1038/35049064 10.1037/0096-3445.125.2.181 10.1002/hipo.20412 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4707-09.2009 10.1080/13554790802613025 10.1038/nrn1052 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.188 10.1002/hipo.20341 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.11.007 10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.518 10.3758/CABN.2.2.174 10.1037/h0054901 10.1006/jmla.1997.2554 10.1097/00001756-199412000-00030 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00167-X 10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.710 10.1111/1467-9280.00288 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.08.019 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00167-3 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5507-08.2009 10.3758/CABN.4.3.393 10.1073/pnas.0905505106 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03282.x 10.3758/BF03195305 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70866-9 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.07.017 10.3758/BF03211318 10.1037/0894-4105.12.3.323 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3662-08.2008 10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.361 10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.003 10.1155/2008/568057 10.1136/jnnp.71.3.340 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.524 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1923-05.2006 10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1499 10.1006/ccog.1996.0008 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.01.019 10.1162/jocn.2009.21190 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Copyright © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. 2010 WILEY-LISS, INC. 2010 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. – notice: 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. – notice: 2010 WILEY-LISS, INC. 2010 |
| DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
| DOI | 10.1002/hipo.20864 |
| DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Anatomy & Physiology |
| EISSN | 1098-1063 |
| EndPage | 1194 |
| ExternalDocumentID | PMC4251874 20848606 10_1002_hipo_20864 HIPO20864 ark_67375_WNG_3019W9W0_S |
| Genre | reviewArticle Journal Article Review Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National Institute of Mental Health funderid: MH59325 – fundername: NIMH NIH HHS grantid: MH59325 – fundername: NIMH NIH HHS grantid: R01 MH059352 |
| GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .GJ .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1L6 1OB 1OC 1ZS 31~ 33P 3SF 3WU 4.4 4ZD 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHQN AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABIJN ABIVO ABJNI ABLJU ABPVW ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFS ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEFGJ AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AETEA AEUYR AEYWJ AFBPY AFFNX AFFPM AFGKR AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AHMBA AIDQK AIDYY AIQQE AITYG AIURR AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AUFTA AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 C45 CS3 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR1 DR2 DRFUL DRSTM DU5 EBD EBS EJD EMOBN F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE G-S G.N GAKWD GNP GODZA H.T H.X HBH HF~ HGLYW HHY HHZ HVGLF HZ~ IX1 J0M JPC KQQ LATKE LAW LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES M6M MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ NNB O66 O9- OIG OVD P2W P2X P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 QRW R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TN5 UB1 V2E W8V W99 WBKPD WIB WIH WIK WJL WNSPC WOHZO WQJ WXSBR WYISQ XG1 XJT XPP XSW XV2 ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAHHS AAYXX ACCFJ ADZOD AEEZP AEQDE AIWBW AJBDE CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5234-2662aef22584042437bf0680629ebb4077440eaa73dd70b4c38f5ff111601b203 |
| IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
| ISSN | 1050-9631 1098-1063 |
| IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:28:41 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 06:31:55 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:02:25 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:56:25 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:05:54 EDT 2025 Sun Sep 21 06:19:24 EDT 2025 Sun Sep 21 06:17:47 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 11 |
| Language | English |
| License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5234-2662aef22584042437bf0680629ebb4077440eaa73dd70b4c38f5ff111601b203 |
| Notes | National Institute of Mental Health - No. MH59325 istex:CAFC9D4D36C9CE74FEE9B2873BCEAC7F0635CAD3 ark:/67375/WNG-3019W9W0-S ArticleID:HIPO20864 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | http://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20864 |
| PMID | 20848606 |
| PQID | 758835779 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 17 |
| ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4251874 proquest_miscellaneous_758835779 pubmed_primary_20848606 crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_hipo_20864 crossref_primary_10_1002_hipo_20864 wiley_primary_10_1002_hipo_20864_HIPO20864 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_3019W9W0_S |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | November 2010 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2010-11-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2010 text: November 2010 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Hoboken |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Hoboken – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Hippocampus |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Hippocampus |
| PublicationYear | 2010 |
| Publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company |
| References | Dodson CS,Johnson MK. 1996. Some problems with the process-dissociation approach to memory. J Exp Psychol Gen 125: 181-194. Baddeley A,Vargha-Khadem F,Mishkin M. 2001. Preserved recognition in a case of developmental amnesia: Implications for the acquisition of semantic memory? J Cogn Neurol 13: 357-369. Turriziani P,Serra L,Fadda L,Caltagirone C,Carlesimo GA. 2008b. Recollection and familiarity in hippocampal amnesia. Hippocampus 18: 469-480. Kirwan CB,Wixted JT,Squire LR. 2008. Activity in the medial temporal lobe predicts memory strength, whereas activity in the prefrontal cortex predicts recollection. J Neurosci 28: 10541-10548. Tulving E,Kroll NEA. 1995. Novelty assessment in the brain and long-term memory encoding. Psychol B Rev 2: 387-390. Gilboa A,Winocur G,Rosenbaum RS,Poreh A,Gao F,Black SE,Westmacott R,Moscovitch M. 2006. Hippocampal contributions to recollection in retrograde and anterograde amnesia. Hippocampus 16: 966-980. Rotello CM,Macmillan NA,Reeder JA. 2004. Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: A two-dimensional signal detection model. Psychol Rev 111: 588-616. Yonelinas AP. 2001b. Consciousness, control and confidence: The three Cs of recognition memory. J Exp Psychol Gen 130: 361-379. Kelley R,Wixted JT. 2001. On the nature of associative information in recognition memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 27: 701-722. Wixted JT. 2007. Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychol Rev 114: 152-176. Kishiyama MM,Yonelinas AP. 2003. Novelty effects on recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Mem Cogn 31: 1045-1051. Lee AC,Bussey TJ,Murray EA,Saksida LM,Epstein RA,Kapur N,Hodges JR,Graham KS. 2005b. Perceptual deficits in amnesia: Challenging the medial temporal lobe 'mnemonic' view. Neuropsychologia 43: 1-11. Bird CM,Varga-Khadem F,Burgess N. 2008. Impaired memory for scenes but not faces in developmental hippocampal amnesia: A case study. Neuropsychologia 46: 1050-1059. Parks CM,Yonelinas AP. 2007. Moving beyond pure signal-detection models: Comment on Wixted. Psychol Rev 114: 188-202. Yonelinas AP,Jacoby LL. 1996. Noncriterial recollection: Familiarity as automatic, irrelevant recollection. Conscious Cogn 5: 131-141. Koen JD,Yonelinas AP. Memory variability is due to the contribution of recollection and familiarity, not encoding variability. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn (in press). Turriziani P,Fadda L,Caltagirone C,Carlesimo G. 2004. Recognition memory for single items and for associations in amnesic patients. Neuropsychologia 42: 426-433. Verfaellie M,Treadwell JR. 1993. The status of recognition memory in amnesia. Neuropsychology 7: 5-13. Gold JJ,Hopkins RO,Squire LR. 2006a. Single-item memory, associative memory, and the human hippocampus. Learn Mem 13: 644-649. Yonelinas AP,Kroll NEA,Dobbins IG,Lazzara M,Knight RT. 1998. Recollection and familiarity deficits in amnesia: Convergence of remember/know, process dissociation, and receiver operating characteristic data. Neuropsychology 12: 323-339. Lee AC,Scahill VL,Graham KS. 2007. Activating the medial temporal lobe during oddity judgment for faces and scenes. Cereb Cortex 18: 683-696. Skinner EI,Fernandes MA. 2007. Neural correlates of recollection and familiarity: A review of neuroimaging and patient data. Neuropsychologia 45: 2163-2179. Buffalo EA,Bellgowan PS,Martin A. 2006. Distinct roles for medial temporal lobe structures in memory for objects and their locations. Learn Mem 13: 638-643. Johnson MK,O'Connor M,Cantor J. 1997. Confabulation, memory deficits, and frontal dysfunction. Brain Cogn 34: 189-206. Reder LM,Nhouyvansivong A,Schunn CD,Ayers MS,Angstadt P,Hiraki K. 2000. A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember/know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. J Exp Psychol Learn 26: 294-320. Voss JL,Hauner KKY,Paller KA. 2009. Evidence for a direct relationship between repetition suppression in human perirhinal cortex and priming. Hippocampus 19:773-778. Holdstock JS,Mayes AR,Gong QY,Roberts N,Kapur N. 2005. Item recognition is less impaired than recall and associative recognition in a patient with selective hippocampal damage. Hippocampus 15: 203-215. Kishiyama MM,Yonelinas AP,Knight RT. 2009. Novelty enhancements in memory are dependent on lateral prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 29: 8114-8118. Bowles B,Crupi C,Mirsattari SM,Pigott S,Parrent AG,Pruessner JC,Yonelinas AP,Kohler S. 2007. Impaired familiarity with preserved recollection after anterior temporal-lobe resection that spares hippocampus. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 104: 16382-16387. Wheeler MA,Stuss DT,Tulving E. 1995. Frontal lobe damage produces episodic memory impairment. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1: 525-536. Yonelinas AP,Kroll NEA,Quamme JR,Lazzara MM,Sauve MJ,Widaman KF,Knight RT. 2002. Effects of extensive temporal lobe damage or mild hypoxia on recollection and familiarity. Nat Neuro 11: 1236-1241. Yonelinas APKroll NEA,Dobbins IG,Soltani M. 1999. Recognition memory for faces: When familiarity supports associative recogntion judgments. Psych Bull Rev 6: 654-661. Cipolotti L,Bird C,Good T,Macmanus D,Rudge P,Shalliace T. 2006. Recollection and familiarity in dense hippocampal amnesia: A case study. Neuropsychologia 44: 489-506. Ryan JD,Althoff RR,Whitlow S,Cohen NJ. 2000. Amnesia is a deficit in relational memory. Psychol Sci 11: 454-461. Rudebeck SR,Scholz J,Millington R,Rohenkohl G,Johansen-Berg H,Lee ACH. Fornix microstructure correlates with recollection but not familiarity memory. J Neurosci 29: 14987-14992. Diana RA,Yonelinas AP,Ranganath C. 2010. Medial temporal lobe activity during source retrieval reflects information type, not memory strength. J Cognitive Neurosci 22: 1808-1818. Gold JJ,Smith CN,Bayley PJ,Shrager Y,Brewer JB,Stark CEL,Hopkins RO,Squire LR. 2006b. Item memory, source memory, and the medial temporal lobe: Concordant findings from fMRI and memory-impaired patients. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 103: 9351-9356. Kumaran D,Maguire EA. 2009. Novelty signals: A window into hippocampal information processing. Trends Cogn Sci 13: 47-54. Olson IR,Page K,Moore KS,Chatterjee A,Verfaellie M. 2006. Working memory for conjunctions relies on the medial temporal lobe. J Neurosci 26: 4596-4601. Holdstock JS,Parslow DM,Morris RG,Fleminge S,Abrahams S,Denby C,Montaldi D,Mayes AR. 2008. Two case studies illustrating how relatively selective hippocampal lesions in humans can have quite different effects on memory. Hippocampus 18: 679-691. Sherman SJ,Atri A,Hasselmo ME,Stern CE,Howard MW. 2003. Scopalomine impairs human recognition memory: Data and modeling. Behav Neurosci 114: 526-539. Wolk DA,Dunfee KL,Dickerson BC,Aizenstein HJ,DeKosky ST. A medial temporal lobe division of labor: Insights from memory in aging and early Alzheimer's disease. Hippocampus. DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20837. Holdstock JS,Mayes AR,Cezayirli E,Isaac CL,Aggleton JP,Roberts N. 2000. A comparison of egocentric and allocentric spatial memory in a patient with selective hippocampal damage. Neuropsychologia 38: 410-425. Kopelman MD,Bright P,Buckman J,Fradera A,Yoshimasu H,Jacobson C,Colchester ACF. 2007. Recall and recognition memory in amnesia: Patients with hippocampal, medial temporal, temporal lobe or frontal pathology. Neuropsychologia 45: 1232-1246. Eichenbaum H,Fortin NJ,Sauvage M,Robitesk RJ,Farovik A. 2010. An animal model of amnesia that uses Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis to distinguish recollection from familiarity deficits in recognition memory. Neuropsychologia 48: 2281-2289. Peters J,Thoma P,Koch B,Schwarz M,Daum I. 2009. Impairment of verbal recollection following ischemic damage to the right anterior hippocampus. Cortex 45: 592-601. Kirwan CB,Wixted JT,Squire LR. 2010. A demonstration that the hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 107: 344-348. DeCarlo LT. 2002. Signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions: Theoretical developments with applications to recognition memory. Psychol Rev 109: 710-721. Rhodes SM,Donaldson DI. 2008. Association and not semantic relationships elicit the N400 effect: Electrophysiological evidence from an explicit language comprehension task. Psychophysiology 45: 50-59. Turriziani P,Oliveri M,Salerno S,Costanzo F,Koch G,Caltagirone C,Carlesimo GA. 2008a. Recognition memory and prefrontal cortex: Dissociating recollection and familiarity processes using rTMS. Behav Neurol 19: 23-27. Yonelinas AP,Jacoby LL. 1995. The relation between remembering and knowing as bases for recognition: Effects of size congruency. J Mem Lang 34: 622-643. Vann SD,Tsivilis D,Denby CE,Quamme JR,Yonelinas AP,Aggleton JP,Montaldi D,Mayes AR. 2009. Impaired recollection but spared familiarity in patients with extended hippocampal system damage revealed by 3 convergent methods. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 5442-5447. Carlesimo GA,Fadda L,Turriziani P,Tomaiuolo F,Caltagirone C. 2001. Selective sparing of face learning in a global amnesic patient. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 71: 340-346. Duarte A,Ranganath C,Knight RT. 2005. Effects of unilateral prefrontal lesions on familiarity, recollection, and source memory. J Neurosci 25: 8333-8337. Yonelinas AP,Widaman K,Mungas D,Reed B,Weiner MW,Chui HC. 2007. Memory in the aging brain: Doubly dissociating the contribution of the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex. Hippocampus 17: 1134-1140. Yonelinas AP. 1999. The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source memory judgments: A formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 25: 513-451. Aggleton JP,Brown MW. 2006. Interleaving brain systems for episodic and recognition memory. Trends Cogn Sci 10: 455-463. Stark CEL,Bayley PJ,Squire LR. 2002. Recognition memory for single items and for associations is similarly impaired following damage to the hippocampal region. Learn Mem 9: 238-242. Henson RN,Rugg MD,Shallice T,Dolan RJ. 2000. Confidence in recognition memory for words: Dissociating right prefrontal 2007; 104 2002; 15 2010; 107 2006; 33 2002; 12 1995; 34 1997; 277 2002; 11 2004; 4 1974; 1 2008; 34 1974 1985; 26 2010; 22 2009; 13 2001a; 356 2000; 12 2005; 102 2000; 11 2008; 28 2006; 26 1995; 21 1953; 60 2009; 19 1998; 12 2009; 15 2007; 17 2007; 18 2004; 42 2001b; 130 29 2002; 9 1971; 27 1997; 25 2006b; 103 1999; 25 2002; 2 2008; 59 1999; 22 2003; 37 2003; 38 2003; 39 2001; 27 1995; 2 2008b; 18 1996; 125 1995; 1 2007; 11 2007; 13 2003; 31 2004; 431 2010; 48 1990; 28 2006; 44 2006; 49 1997; 35 1997; 34 2008; 45 2008; 46 2005; 15 2005; 18 2005; 12 42 2009; 106 2009; 45 1993; 7 2009; 47 2005a; 15 1978; 30 1997; 111 1980; 87 2003; 13 2005; 21 2007; 30 1996; 35 2003; 114 1992; 99 2006a; 13 2003; 110 2005; 25 1994; 20 1997; 11 2002; 46 2007; 133 2005b; 43 2003; 4 2002; 109 2001; 18 1996; 24 1996; 5 2001; 13 2005; 33 2001; 71 2009; 20 2006; 13 1985; 4 2000; 26 2006; 10 2008a; 19 2006; 16 2008; 18 1991; 30 2006; 1107 2005; 43 2006; 6 2008; 11 1989; 27 1999; 6 1958 2007; 57 2009; 29 1999; 9 2004; 10 1998; 38 2007; 114 2004; 111 2000; 38 2004; 19 2004; 16 1997; 121 1964 2001; 2 2007; 45 1994; 5 1998; 36 Wolk DA (e_1_2_8_140_1) Milner B (e_1_2_8_84_1) 1985; 4 Swets JA (e_1_2_8_120_1) 1964 e_1_2_8_26_1 e_1_2_8_49_1 e_1_2_8_68_1 e_1_2_8_132_1 e_1_2_8_155_1 e_1_2_8_5_1 e_1_2_8_151_1 e_1_2_8_9_1 e_1_2_8_117_1 e_1_2_8_22_1 e_1_2_8_45_1 e_1_2_8_64_1 e_1_2_8_87_1 e_1_2_8_113_1 e_1_2_8_41_1 e_1_2_8_60_1 e_1_2_8_83_1 e_1_2_8_19_1 e_1_2_8_109_1 e_1_2_8_15_1 e_1_2_8_57_1 Knowlton BJ (e_1_2_8_65_1) 1995; 21 e_1_2_8_143_1 e_1_2_8_91_1 e_1_2_8_95_1 e_1_2_8_105_1 e_1_2_8_128_1 e_1_2_8_11_1 e_1_2_8_34_1 e_1_2_8_53_1 e_1_2_8_101_1 e_1_2_8_124_1 e_1_2_8_147_1 e_1_2_8_30_1 e_1_2_8_72_1 e_1_2_8_29_1 e_1_2_8_25_1 e_1_2_8_48_1 Ranganath C (e_1_2_8_99_1); 42 e_1_2_8_2_1 e_1_2_8_133_1 e_1_2_8_110_1 e_1_2_8_152_1 e_1_2_8_6_1 Wheeler MA (e_1_2_8_136_1) 2003; 39 e_1_2_8_21_1 e_1_2_8_67_1 e_1_2_8_44_1 e_1_2_8_86_1 e_1_2_8_118_1 e_1_2_8_63_1 e_1_2_8_137_1 e_1_2_8_40_1 e_1_2_8_82_1 e_1_2_8_114_1 e_1_2_8_18_1 Verfaellie M (e_1_2_8_130_1) 1993; 7 e_1_2_8_14_1 e_1_2_8_37_1 e_1_2_8_79_1 e_1_2_8_94_1 e_1_2_8_144_1 e_1_2_8_90_1 Murdock BB (e_1_2_8_85_1) 1974 e_1_2_8_121_1 e_1_2_8_98_1 e_1_2_8_10_1 e_1_2_8_56_1 e_1_2_8_106_1 e_1_2_8_33_1 e_1_2_8_75_1 e_1_2_8_129_1 e_1_2_8_52_1 e_1_2_8_102_1 e_1_2_8_148_1 e_1_2_8_71_1 e_1_2_8_125_1 e_1_2_8_28_1 e_1_2_8_24_1 e_1_2_8_47_1 e_1_2_8_3_1 e_1_2_8_81_1 e_1_2_8_111_1 e_1_2_8_153_1 e_1_2_8_20_1 e_1_2_8_43_1 e_1_2_8_89_1 e_1_2_8_119_1 e_1_2_8_138_1 e_1_2_8_62_1 Mandler G (e_1_2_8_76_1) 1980; 87 e_1_2_8_115_1 e_1_2_8_134_1 e_1_2_8_17_1 Atkinson RC (e_1_2_8_7_1) 1974 e_1_2_8_13_1 e_1_2_8_36_1 e_1_2_8_59_1 Rudebeck SR (e_1_2_8_107_1); 29 e_1_2_8_70_1 e_1_2_8_122_1 e_1_2_8_141_1 e_1_2_8_97_1 e_1_2_8_32_1 e_1_2_8_55_1 e_1_2_8_78_1 e_1_2_8_149_1 e_1_2_8_51_1 e_1_2_8_74_1 Egan JP (e_1_2_8_38_1) 1958 e_1_2_8_103_1 e_1_2_8_126_1 e_1_2_8_145_1 e_1_2_8_93_1 e_1_2_8_46_1 e_1_2_8_27_1 e_1_2_8_69_1 e_1_2_8_80_1 e_1_2_8_154_1 e_1_2_8_4_1 e_1_2_8_131_1 e_1_2_8_150_1 e_1_2_8_8_1 e_1_2_8_42_1 e_1_2_8_88_1 e_1_2_8_116_1 e_1_2_8_23_1 e_1_2_8_139_1 e_1_2_8_112_1 Koen JD (e_1_2_8_66_1) e_1_2_8_61_1 e_1_2_8_135_1 e_1_2_8_39_1 e_1_2_8_35_1 e_1_2_8_16_1 e_1_2_8_58_1 e_1_2_8_92_1 e_1_2_8_96_1 e_1_2_8_100_1 e_1_2_8_142_1 e_1_2_8_31_1 e_1_2_8_77_1 e_1_2_8_127_1 e_1_2_8_12_1 e_1_2_8_54_1 e_1_2_8_108_1 e_1_2_8_73_1 e_1_2_8_123_1 e_1_2_8_50_1 e_1_2_8_104_1 e_1_2_8_146_1 |
| References_xml | – reference: Davidson PSR,Glisky EL. 2002. Neuropsychological correlates of recollection and familiarity in normal aging. Cogn Affect Behav Neurol 2: 174-186. – reference: Lee AC,Scahill VL,Graham KS. 2007. Activating the medial temporal lobe during oddity judgment for faces and scenes. Cereb Cortex 18: 683-696. – reference: Holdstock JS,Parslow DM,Morris RG,Fleminge S,Abrahams S,Denby C,Montaldi D,Mayes AR. 2008. Two case studies illustrating how relatively selective hippocampal lesions in humans can have quite different effects on memory. Hippocampus 18: 679-691. – reference: Wixted JT. 2007. Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychol Rev 114: 152-176. – reference: Dolcos F,LaBar KS,Cabeza R. 2005. Remembering one year later: Role of the amygdala and the medial temporal lobe memory system in retrieving emotional memories. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 2626-2631. – reference: Parks CM. 2007. The role of noncriterial recollection in estimating recollection and familiarity. J Mem Lang 57: 81-100. – reference: Kirwan CB,Wixted JT,Squire LR. 2008. Activity in the medial temporal lobe predicts memory strength, whereas activity in the prefrontal cortex predicts recollection. J Neurosci 28: 10541-10548. – reference: Ranganath C,Rainer G. 2003. Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events. Nat Rev Neurosci 4: 193-202. – reference: Bussey TJ,Saksida LM,Murray EA. 2002. Perirhinal cortex resolves feature ambiguity in complex visual discriminations. Eur J Neurosci 15: 365-374. – reference: Yonelinas AP. 2001a. Components of episodic memory: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 356: 1363-1374. – reference: Ratcliffe R,Sheu CF,Gronlund SD. 1992. Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychol Rev 99: 518-535. – reference: Manns JR,Hopkins RO,Reed JM,Kitchener EG,Squire LR. 2003. Recognition memory and the human hippocampus. Neuron 37: 171-180. – reference: Wheeler MA,Stuss DT. 2003. Remember and knowing in patients with frontal lobe lesions. Cortex 39: 827-846. – reference: Shimamura AP,Janowsky JS,Squire LR. 1990. Memory for the temporal order of events in patients with frontal lobe lesions and amnesic patients. Neuropsychologia 28: 803-813. – reference: Parks CM,Yonelinas AP. 2007. Moving beyond pure signal-detection models: Comment on Wixted. Psychol Rev 114: 188-202. – reference: Olson IR,Page K,Moore KS,Chatterjee A,Verfaellie M. 2006. Working memory for conjunctions relies on the medial temporal lobe. J Neurosci 26: 4596-4601. – reference: Tulving E,Markowitsch HJ,Kapur S,Habib R,Houle S. 1994. Novelty encoding networks in the human brain: Positron emission tomography data. Neuroreport 5: 2525-2528. – reference: Yonelinas AP. 1999. The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source memory judgments: A formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 25: 513-451. – reference: Skinner EI,Fernandes MA. 2007. Neural correlates of recollection and familiarity: A review of neuroimaging and patient data. Neuropsychologia 45: 2163-2179. – reference: Aggleton JP,Brown MW. 2006. Interleaving brain systems for episodic and recognition memory. Trends Cogn Sci 10: 455-463. – reference: Peters J,Thoma P,Koch B,Schwarz M,Daum I. 2009. Impairment of verbal recollection following ischemic damage to the right anterior hippocampus. Cortex 45: 592-601. – reference: Slotnick SD,Klein SA,Dodson CS,Shimamura AP. 2000. An analysis of signal detection and threshold models of source memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 26: 1499-1517. – reference: Wheeler MA,Stuss DT,Tulving E. 1995. Frontal lobe damage produces episodic memory impairment. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1: 525-536. – reference: Diana RA,Yonelinas AP,Ranganath C. 2010. Medial temporal lobe activity during source retrieval reflects information type, not memory strength. J Cognitive Neurosci 22: 1808-1818. – reference: Kishiyama MM,Yonelinas AP,Lazzara MM. 2004. The von Restorff effect in amnesia: The contribution of the hippocampal system to novelty-related memory enhancements. J Cogn Neurosci 16: 15-23. – reference: Dunn JC. 2004. Remember-know: A matter of confidence. Psychol Rev 111: 524-542. – reference: Bowles B,Crupi C,Mirsattari SM,Pigott S,Parrent AG,Pruessner JC,Yonelinas AP,Kohler S. 2007. Impaired familiarity with preserved recollection after anterior temporal-lobe resection that spares hippocampus. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 104: 16382-16387. – reference: Turriziani P,Oliveri M,Salerno S,Costanzo F,Koch G,Caltagirone C,Carlesimo GA. 2008a. Recognition memory and prefrontal cortex: Dissociating recollection and familiarity processes using rTMS. Behav Neurol 19: 23-27. – reference: Adlam ALR,Malloy M,Mishkin M,Vargha-Khadem F. 2009. Dissociation between recognition and recall in developmental amnesia. Neuropsychologia 47: 2207-2210. – reference: Diana RA,Yonelinas AP,Ranganath C. 2008. The effects of unitization on familiarity-based source memory: Testing a behavioral prediction derived from neuroimaging data. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 34: 730-740. – reference: Gold JJ,Hopkins RO,Squire LR. 2006a. Single-item memory, associative memory, and the human hippocampus. Learn Mem 13: 644-649. – reference: Fortin NJ,Wright SP,Eichenbaum H. 2004. Recollection-like memory retrieval in rats is dependent on the hippocampus. Nature 431: 188-191. – reference: Graham KS,Barense MD,Lee AC. 2010. Going beyond LTM in the MTL: A synthesis of neuropsychological and neuroimaging findings on the role of the medial temporal lobe in memory and perception. Neuropsychologia 48: 831-853. – reference: Reed JM,Squire LR. 1997. Impaired recognition memory in patients with lesions limited to the hippocampal formation. Behav Neurol 111: 667-675. – reference: Holdstock JS,Mayes AR,Cezayirli E,Isaac CL,Aggleton JP,Roberts N. 2000. A comparison of egocentric and allocentric spatial memory in a patient with selective hippocampal damage. Neuropsychologia 38: 410-425. – reference: Lee AC,Bussey TJ,Murray EA,Saksida LM,Epstein RA,Kapur N,Hodges JR,Graham KS. 2005b. Perceptual deficits in amnesia: Challenging the medial temporal lobe 'mnemonic' view. Neuropsychologia 43: 1-11. – reference: Rhodes SM,Donaldson DI. 2007. Electropysiological evidence for the influence of unitization on the processes engaged during episodic retrieval: Enhancing familiarity based remembering. Neuropsychologia 45: 412-424. – reference: Yonelinas AP,Kroll NEA,Dobbins IG,Lazzara M,Knight RT. 1998. Recollection and familiarity deficits in amnesia: Convergence of remember/know, process dissociation, and receiver operating characteristic data. Neuropsychology 12: 323-339. – reference: Knowlton BJ,Squire LR. 1995. Remembering and knowing: Two different expression of declarative memory. J Exp Pychol Learn Mem Cogn 21: 699-710. – reference: Kishiyama MM,Yonelinas AP. 2003. Novelty effects on recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. Mem Cogn 31: 1045-1051. – reference: Fenker DB,Schott BH,Richardson-Klavehn A,Heinze HJ,Düzel E. 2005. Recapitulating emotional context: Activity of amygdala, hippocampus and fusiform cortex during recollection and familiarity. Eur J Neurosci 21: 1993-1999. – reference: Mayes A,Montaldi D,Migo E. 2007. Associative memory and the medial temporal lobes. Trends Cogn Sci 11: 126-135. – reference: Donaldson W. 1996. The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing. Mem Cogn 24: 523-533. – reference: Egan JP. 1958. Recognition memory and the operating characteristic. USAF Tech Note. No. 58-51, 32. Indianapolis IN: Oper Appl Lab. – reference: Dobbins IG,Kroll NEA,Yonelinas AP,Liu Q. 1998. Distinctiveness in recognition and free recall: The role of recollection in the rejection of the familiar. J Mem Lang 38: 381-400. – reference: MacPherson SE,Bozzali M,Cipolotti L,Dolan RJ,Rees JH,Shallice T. 2008. Effect of frontal lobe lesions on the recollection and familiarity components of recognition memory. Neuropsychologia 46: 3124-3132. – reference: Giovanello KS,Keane MM,Verfaellie M. 2006. The contribution of familiarity to associative memory in amnesia. Neuropsychologia 44: 1859-1865. – reference: Norman KA,O'Reilly RC. 2003. Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary-learning-systems approach. Psychol Rev 110: 611-646. – reference: Rudebeck SR,Scholz J,Millington R,Rohenkohl G,Johansen-Berg H,Lee ACH. Fornix microstructure correlates with recollection but not familiarity memory. J Neurosci 29: 14987-14992. – reference: Yonelinas AP,Kroll NEA,Quamme JR,Lazzara MM,Sauve MJ,Widaman KF,Knight RT. 2002. Effects of extensive temporal lobe damage or mild hypoxia on recollection and familiarity. Nat Neuro 11: 1236-1241. – reference: Mandler G. 1980. Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychol Rev 87: 252-271. – reference: Henson RN,Rugg MD,Shallice T,Dolan RJ. 2000. Confidence in recognition memory for words: Dissociating right prefrontal roles in episodic retrieval. J Cogn Neurosci 12: 913-923. – reference: Janowsky JS,Shimamura AP,Squire LR. 1989. Source memory impairment in patients with frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia 27: 1043-1056. – reference: Kopelman MD,Stanhope N. 1998. Recall and recognition memory in patients with focal frontal, temporal lobe and diencephalic lesions. Neuropsychologia 36: 785-796. – reference: Turriziani P,Fadda L,Caltagirone C,Carlesimo G. 2004. Recognition memory for single items and for associations in amnesic patients. Neuropsychologia 42: 426-433. – reference: Farovik A,Dupont LM,Arce M,Eichenbaum H. 2008. Medial prefrontal cortex supports recollection, but not familiarity, in the rat. J Neurosci 28: 13428-13434. – reference: Koen JD,Yonelinas AP. Memory variability is due to the contribution of recollection and familiarity, not encoding variability. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn (in press). – reference: Tulving E. 1985. Memory and consciousness. Can Psychol 26: 1-12. – reference: Quamme JR,Yonelinas AP,Norman KA. 2007. Effect of unitization on associative recognition in amnesia. Hippocampus 17: 192-200. – reference: O'Kane G,Insler RZ,Wagner AD. 2005. Conceptual and perceptual novelty effects in human medial temporal cortex. Hippocampus 15: 326-332. – reference: Pihlajamäki M,Tanila H,Könönen M,Hänninen T,Hämäläinen A,Soininen H,Aronen HJ. 2004. Visual presentation of novel objects and new spatial arrangements of objects differentially activates the medial temporal lobe subareas in humans. Eur J Neurosci 19: 1939-1949. – reference: Hannula DE,Tranel D,Cohen NJ. 2006. The long and the short of it: Relational memory impairments in amnesia, even at short lags. J Neurosci 26: 8352-8359. – reference: Yonelinas AP,Parks CM. 2007. Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: A review. Psychol Bull 133: 800-832. – reference: Mickes L,Wais PE,Wixted JT. 2009. Recollection is a continuous process: Implications for dual-process theories of recognition memory. Psychol Sci 20: 509-515. – reference: Carlesimo GA,Serrab L,Faddaa L,Cherubinic A,Bozzalic M,Caltagirone C. 2007. Bilateral damage to the mammillo-thalamic tract impairs recollection but not familiarity in the recognition process: A single case investigation. Neuropsychologia 45: 2467-2479. – reference: Bussey TJ,Saksida LM. 2007. Memory, perception, and the ventral visual-perirhinal-hippocampal stream: Thinking outside of the boxes. Hippocampus 17: 898-908. – reference: Aggleton JP,Brown MW. 1999. Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal anterior thalamic axis. Behav Brain Sci 22: 425-44. – reference: Ryan JD,Althoff RR,Whitlow S,Cohen NJ. 2000. Amnesia is a deficit in relational memory. Psychol Sci 11: 454-461. – reference: Yonelinas AP,Jacoby LL. 1996. Noncriterial recollection: Familiarity as automatic, irrelevant recollection. Conscious Cogn 5: 131-141. – reference: Litman L,Awipi T,Davachi L. 2009. Category-specificity in the human medial temporal lobe cortex. Hippocampus 19: 308-319. – reference: Aggleton JP,Vann SD,Denby C,Dix S,Mayes AR,Roberts N,Yonelinas AP. 2005. Sparing of the familiarity component of recogntion memory in a patient with hippocampal pathology. Neuropsychologia 43: 1810-1823. – reference: Yonelinas APKroll NEA,Dobbins IG,Soltani M. 1999. Recognition memory for faces: When familiarity supports associative recogntion judgments. Psych Bull Rev 6: 654-661. – reference: Carlesimo GA,Fadda L,Turriziani P,Tomaiuolo F,Caltagirone C. 2001. Selective sparing of face learning in a global amnesic patient. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 71: 340-346. – reference: Sauvage MM,Fortin NJ,Owens CB,Yonelinas AP,Eichenbaum H. 2008. Recognition memory: Opposite effects of hippocampal damage on recollection and familiarity. Nat Neurol 11: 16-18. – reference: Yonelinas AP,Quamme JR,Widaman KF,Kroll NEA,Sauve MJ,Knight RT. 2004. Mild hypoxia disrupts recollection, not familiarity. Cog Affec Behav Neurol 4: 393-400. – reference: Parks CM,Yonelinas AP. 2009. Evidence for a memory threshold in second-choice recognition memory responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 11515-11519. – reference: Eichenbaum H,Fortin NJ,Sauvage M,Robitesk RJ,Farovik A. 2010. An animal model of amnesia that uses Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis to distinguish recollection from familiarity deficits in recognition memory. Neuropsychologia 48: 2281-2289. – reference: Ranganath C,Yonelinas AP,Cohen MX,Dy CJ,Tom SM,D'Esposito M. Dissociable correlates of recollection and familiarity within the medial temporal lobes. Neuropsychologia 42: 2-13. – reference: Rotello CM,Macmillan NA,Reeder JA,Wong M. 2005. The remember response: Subject to bias, graded, and not a process-pure indicator of recollection. Psychon Bull Rev 12: 865-873. – reference: Gilboa A,Winocur G,Rosenbaum RS,Poreh A,Gao F,Black SE,Westmacott R,Moscovitch M. 2006. Hippocampal contributions to recollection in retrograde and anterograde amnesia. Hippocampus 16: 966-980. – reference: Brandt KR,Gardiner JM,Vargha-Khadem F,Baddeley AD,Mishkin M. 2009. Impairment of recollection but not familiarity in a case of developmental amnesia. Neurocase 15: 60-65. – reference: Kishiyama MM,Yonelinas AP,Knight RT. 2009. Novelty enhancements in memory are dependent on lateral prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 29: 8114-8118. – reference: Reder LM,Nhouyvansivong A,Schunn CD,Ayers MS,Angstadt P,Hiraki K. 2000. A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember/know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. J Exp Psychol Learn 26: 294-320. – reference: Slotnick SD,Dodson CS. 2005. Support for a continuous (single-process) model of recognition memory and source memory. Mem Cogn 33: 151-170. – reference: Yonelinas AP. 1997. Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. Mem Cogn 25: 747-763. – reference: Rotello CM,Macmillan NA,Reeder JA. 2004. Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: A two-dimensional signal detection model. Psychol Rev 111: 588-616. – reference: Buffalo EA,Bellgowan PS,Martin A. 2006. Distinct roles for medial temporal lobe structures in memory for objects and their locations. Learn Mem 13: 638-643. – reference: Dobbins IG,Simons JS,Schacter DL. 2004. fMRI evidence for separable and lateralized prefrontal memory monitoring processes. J Cogn Neurosci 16: 908-920. – reference: Yonelinas AP,Jacoby LL. 1995. The relation between remembering and knowing as bases for recognition: Effects of size congruency. J Mem Lang 34: 622-643. – reference: Quamme JR,Yonelinas AP,Widaman KF,Kroll NEA,Sauve MJ. 2004. Recall and recogntion in mild hypoxia: Using covariance structural modeling to test competing theories of explicit memory. Neuropsychologia 42: 672-691. – reference: Bricker PD,Chapanis A. 1953. Do incorrectly perceived tachistoscopic stimuli convey some information? Psychol Rev 60: 181-188. – reference: Wais PE. 2008. fMRI signal associated with memory strength in the medial temporal lobes: A meta-analysis. Neuropsychologia 46: 3185-3196. – reference: Yonelinas AP. 2002. The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. J Mem Lang 46: 441-517. – reference: Yonelinas AP. 2001b. Consciousness, control and confidence: The three Cs of recognition memory. J Exp Psychol Gen 130: 361-379. – reference: Stark CEL,Bayley PJ,Squire LR. 2002. Recognition memory for single items and for associations is similarly impaired following damage to the hippocampal region. Learn Mem 9: 238-242. – reference: Elfman KW,Parks CM,Yonelinas AP. 2008. Testing a neurocomputational model of recollection, familiarity, and source recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 34: 752-768. – reference: Murdock BB. 1974. Human Memory: Theory and Data. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 362p. – reference: Dodson CS,Johnson MK. 1996. Some problems with the process-dissociation approach to memory. J Exp Psychol Gen 125: 181-194. – reference: Milner B. 1971. Interhemispheric differences in the localization of psychological processes in man. Br Med Bull 27: 272-277. – reference: Bastin C,Van der Linden M,Charnallet A,Denby C,Montaldi D,Roberts N,Mayes AR. 2004. Dissociation between recall and recognition memory performance in an amnesic patient with hippocampal damage following carbon monoxide poisoning. Neurocase 10: 330-344. – reference: Baddeley A,Vargha-Khadem F,Mishkin M. 2001. Preserved recognition in a case of developmental amnesia: Implications for the acquisition of semantic memory? J Cogn Neurol 13: 357-369. – reference: Kumaran D,Maguire EA. 2007. Which computational mechanisms operate in the hippocampus during novelty detection? Hippocampus 17: 735-748. – reference: Verfaellie M,Treadwell JR. 1993. The status of recognition memory in amnesia. Neuropsychology 7: 5-13. – reference: Bird CM,Varga-Khadem F,Burgess N. 2008. Impaired memory for scenes but not faces in developmental hippocampal amnesia: A case study. Neuropsychologia 46: 1050-1059. – reference: Jager T,Szabo K,Griebe M,Bazner H,Moller J,Hennerici M. 2009. Selective disruption of hippocampus-mediated recognition memory processes after episodes of transient global amnesia. Neuropsychologia 47: 70-76. – reference: Holdstock JS,Mayes AR,Gong QY,Roberts N,Kapur N. 2005. Item recognition is less impaired than recall and associative recognition in a patient with selective hippocampal damage. Hippocampus 15: 203-215. – reference: Yonelinas AP. 1994. Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 20: 1341-1354. – reference: Cipolotti L,Bird C,Good T,Macmanus D,Rudge P,Shalliace T. 2006. Recollection and familiarity in dense hippocampal amnesia: A case study. Neuropsychologia 44: 489-506. – reference: Gold JJ,Smith CN,Bayley PJ,Shrager Y,Brewer JB,Stark CEL,Hopkins RO,Squire LR. 2006b. Item memory, source memory, and the medial temporal lobe: Concordant findings from fMRI and memory-impaired patients. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 103: 9351-9356. – reference: Voss JL,Hauner KKY,Paller KA. 2009. Evidence for a direct relationship between repetition suppression in human perirhinal cortex and priming. Hippocampus 19:773-778. – reference: Schacter DL,Verfaellie M,Anes MD. 1997. Illusory memories in amnesic patients: Conceptual and perceptual false recognition. Neuropsychology 11: 331-342. – reference: Turriziani P,Serra L,Fadda L,Caltagirone C,Carlesimo GA. 2008b. Recollection and familiarity in hippocampal amnesia. Hippocampus 18: 469-480. – reference: Diana RA,Yonelinas AP,Ranganath C. 2007. Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: A three-component model. Trends Cogn Sci 11: 379-386. – reference: Huppert FA,Piercy M. 1978. The role of trace strength in recency and frequency judgments by amnesic and control subjects. Q J Exp Psychol 30: 347-354. – reference: Haskins AL,Yonelinas AP,Quamme JR,Ranganath C. 2008. Perirhinal cortex supports encoding and familiarity-based recognition of novel associations. Neuron 59: 554-560. – reference: Vargha-Khadem F,Gadian DG,Watkins KE,Connelly A,Van Paesschen W,Mishkin M. 1997. Differential effects of early hippocampal pathology on episodic and semantic memory. Science 277: 376-380. – reference: Milner B,Petrides M,Smith ML. 1985. Frontal lobes and the temporal organization of memory. Hum Neurobiol 4: 137-142. – reference: Sherman SJ,Atri A,Hasselmo ME,Stern CE,Howard MW. 2003. Scopalomine impairs human recognition memory: Data and modeling. Behav Neurosci 114: 526-539. – reference: Aggleton JP,Brown MW. 2001. Recognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus? Nat Rev Neurosci 2: 51-61. – reference: Swets JA. 1964. Signal Detection and Recognition by Human Observers: Contemporary Readings. New York: Wiley. 702 p. – reference: Yonelinas AP,Otten LJ,Shaw KN,Rugg MD. 2005. Separating the brain regions involved in recollection and familiarity in recognition memory. J Neurosci 25: 3002-3008. – reference: Kopelman MD,Bright P,Buckman J,Fradera A,Yoshimasu H,Jacobson C,Colchester ACF. 2007. Recall and recognition memory in amnesia: Patients with hippocampal, medial temporal, temporal lobe or frontal pathology. Neuropsychologia 45: 1232-1246. – reference: Vann SD,Tsivilis D,Denby CE,Quamme JR,Yonelinas AP,Aggleton JP,Montaldi D,Mayes AR. 2009. Impaired recollection but spared familiarity in patients with extended hippocampal system damage revealed by 3 convergent methods. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 5442-5447. – reference: DeCarlo LT. 2002. Signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions: Theoretical developments with applications to recognition memory. Psychol Rev 109: 710-721. – reference: Johnson MK,O'Connor M,Cantor J. 1997. Confabulation, memory deficits, and frontal dysfunction. Brain Cogn 34: 189-206. – reference: Nyberg L. 2005. Any novelty in hippocampal formation and memory? Curr Opin Neurol 18: 424-428. – reference: Lee AC,Buckley MJ,Pegman SJ,Spiers H,Scahill VL,Gaffan D,Bussey TJ,Davies RR,Kapur N,Hodges JR,Graham KS. 2005a. Specialization in the medial temporal lobe for processing of objects and scenes. Hippocampus 15: 782-797. – reference: Kelley R,Wixted JT. 2001. On the nature of associative information in recognition memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 27: 701-722. – reference: Stark CEL,Squire LR. 2003. Hippocampal damage equally impairs memory for single items and memory for conjunctions. Hippocampus 13: 281-292. – reference: Manns JR,Squire LR. 1999. Impaired recognition memory on the doors and people test after damage limited to the hippocampal region. Hippocampus 9: 495-499. – reference: Rhodes SM,Donaldson DI. 2008. Association and not semantic relationships elicit the N400 effect: Electrophysiological evidence from an explicit language comprehension task. Psychophysiology 45: 50-59. – reference: Jacoby LL. 1991. A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. J Mem Lang 30: 513-541. – reference: Swick D,Senkfor AJ,Petten CV. 2006. Source memory retrieval is affected by aging and prefrontal lesions: Behavioral and ERP evidence. Brain Res 1107: 161-176. – reference: Blaxton TA,Theodore WH. 1997. The role of the temporal lobes in recognizing visuospatial materials: Remembering versus knowing. Brain Cogn 35: 5-25. – reference: Wais PE,Wixted JT,Hopkins RO,Squire LR. 2006. The hippocampus supports both the recollection and the familiarity components of recognition memory. Neuron 49: 459-466. – reference: Piekema C,Kessels RP,Mars RB,Petersson KM,Fernández G. 2006. The right hippocampus participates in short-term memory maintenance of object-location associations. Neuroimage 33: 374-382. – reference: Bar M,Aminoff E. 2003. Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron 38: 347-358. – reference: Yonelinas AP,Widaman K,Mungas D,Reed B,Weiner MW,Chui HC. 2007. Memory in the aging brain: Doubly dissociating the contribution of the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex. Hippocampus 17: 1134-1140. – reference: Mayes AR,Holdstock JS,Isaac CL,Hunkin NM,Roberts N. 2002. Relative sparing of item recognition memory in a patient with adult-onset damage limited to the hippocampus. Hippocampus 12: 325-340. – reference: Duarte A,Ranganath C,Knight RT. 2005. Effects of unilateral prefrontal lesions on familiarity, recollection, and source memory. J Neurosci 25: 8333-8337. – reference: Wolk DA,Dunfee KL,Dickerson BC,Aizenstein HJ,DeKosky ST. A medial temporal lobe division of labor: Insights from memory in aging and early Alzheimer's disease. Hippocampus. DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20837. – reference: Wais PE,Squire LR,Wixted JT. 2010. In search of recollection and familiarity signals in the hippocampus. J Cogn Neurol 22: 109-123. – reference: Tulving E,Kroll NEA. 1995. Novelty assessment in the brain and long-term memory encoding. Psychol B Rev 2: 387-390. – reference: Kirwan CB,Wixted JT,Squire LR. 2010. A demonstration that the hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 107: 344-348. – reference: Mayes AR,Isaac CL,Holdstock JS,Hunkin NM,Montaldi D,Downes JJ,MacDonald C,Cezayirli E,Roberts JN. 2001. Memory for single items, word pairs, and temporal order in a patient with selective hippocampal lesions. Cogn Neuropsychol 18: 97-123. – reference: Blumenfeld RS,Ranganath C. 2007. Prefrontal cortex and long-term memory encoding: An integrative review of findings from neuropsychology and neuroimaging. Neuroscientist 13: 280-291. – reference: Schacter DL,Verfaellie M,Pradere D. 1996. The neuropsychology of memory illusions: False recall and recognition in amnesic patients. J Mem Lang 35: 319-334. – reference: Eichenbaum H,Yonelinas AP,Ranganath C. 2007. The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. Annu Rev Neurosci 30: 123-152. – reference: Bird CM,Shallice T,Cipolotti L. 2007. Fractionation of memory in medial temporal lobe amnesia. Neuropsychologia 45: 1160-1171. – reference: Kumaran D,Maguire EA. 2009. Novelty signals: A window into hippocampal information processing. Trends Cogn Sci 13: 47-54. – reference: Staresina BP,Davachi L. 2006. Differential encoding mechanisms for subsequent associative recognition and free recall. J Neurosci 6: 9162-9172. – reference: Wheeler MA,Stuss DT,Tulving E. 1997. Toward a theory of episodic memory: The frontal lobes and autonoetic consciousness. Psychol Bull 121: 331-354. – volume: 29 start-page: 8114 year: 2009 end-page: 8118 article-title: Novelty enhancements in memory are dependent on lateral prefrontal cortex publication-title: J Neurosci – volume: 111 start-page: 524 year: 2004 end-page: 542 article-title: Remember‐know: A matter of confidence publication-title: Psychol Rev – volume: 17 start-page: 1134 year: 2007 end-page: 1140 article-title: Memory in the aging brain: Doubly dissociating the contribution of the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex publication-title: Hippocampus – volume: 106 start-page: 11515 year: 2009 end-page: 11519 article-title: Evidence for a memory threshold in second‐choice recognition memory responses publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA – volume: 9 start-page: 238 year: 2002 end-page: 242 article-title: Recognition memory for single items and for associations is similarly impaired following damage to the hippocampal region publication-title: Learn Mem – volume: 28 start-page: 803 year: 1990 end-page: 813 article-title: Memory for the temporal order of events in patients with frontal lobe lesions and amnesic patients publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 99 start-page: 518 year: 1992 end-page: 535 article-title: Testing global memory models using ROC curves publication-title: Psychol Rev – volume: 431 start-page: 188 year: 2004 end-page: 191 article-title: Recollection‐like memory retrieval in rats is dependent on the hippocampus publication-title: Nature – volume: 33 start-page: 374 year: 2006 end-page: 382 article-title: The right hippocampus participates in short‐term memory maintenance of object‐location associations publication-title: Neuroimage – volume: 4 start-page: 193 year: 2003 end-page: 202 article-title: Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events publication-title: Nat Rev Neurosci – volume: 27 start-page: 272 year: 1971 end-page: 277 article-title: Interhemispheric differences in the localization of psychological processes in man publication-title: Br Med Bull – volume: 21 start-page: 699 year: 1995 end-page: 710 article-title: Remembering and knowing: Two different expression of declarative memory publication-title: J Exp Pychol Learn Mem Cogn – volume: 114 start-page: 526 year: 2003 end-page: 539 article-title: Scopalomine impairs human recognition memory: Data and modeling publication-title: Behav Neurosci – volume: 110 start-page: 611 year: 2003 end-page: 646 article-title: Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary‐learning‐systems approach publication-title: Psychol Rev – volume: 27 start-page: 1043 year: 1989 end-page: 1056 article-title: Source memory impairment in patients with frontal lobe lesions publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 34 start-page: 752 year: 2008 end-page: 768 article-title: Testing a neurocomputational model of recollection, familiarity, and source recognition publication-title: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn – volume: 13 start-page: 280 year: 2007 end-page: 291 article-title: Prefrontal cortex and long‐term memory encoding: An integrative review of findings from neuropsychology and neuroimaging publication-title: Neuroscientist – volume: 19 start-page: 308 year: 2009 end-page: 319 article-title: Category‐specificity in the human medial temporal lobe cortex publication-title: Hippocampus – volume: 47 start-page: 70 year: 2009 end-page: 76 article-title: Selective disruption of hippocampus‐mediated recognition memory processes after episodes of transient global amnesia publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 2 start-page: 387 year: 1995 end-page: 390 article-title: Novelty assessment in the brain and long‐term memory encoding publication-title: Psychol B Rev – volume: 12 start-page: 323 year: 1998 end-page: 339 article-title: Recollection and familiarity deficits in amnesia: Convergence of remember/know, process dissociation, and receiver operating characteristic data publication-title: Neuropsychology – start-page: 702 year: 1964 – volume: 17 start-page: 898 year: 2007 end-page: 908 article-title: Memory, perception, and the ventral visual‐perirhinal‐hippocampal stream: Thinking outside of the boxes publication-title: Hippocampus – volume: 29 start-page: 14987 end-page: 14992 article-title: Fornix microstructure correlates with recollection but not familiarity memory publication-title: J Neurosci – volume: 16 start-page: 966 year: 2006 end-page: 980 article-title: Hippocampal contributions to recollection in retrograde and anterograde amnesia publication-title: Hippocampus – volume: 25 start-page: 3002 year: 2005 end-page: 3008 article-title: Separating the brain regions involved in recollection and familiarity in recognition memory publication-title: J Neurosci – volume: 16 start-page: 908 year: 2004 end-page: 920 article-title: fMRI evidence for separable and lateralized prefrontal memory monitoring processes publication-title: J Cogn Neurosci – volume: 1 start-page: 239 year: 1974 end-page: 289 – volume: 37 start-page: 171 year: 2003 end-page: 180 article-title: Recognition memory and the human hippocampus publication-title: Neuron – volume: 18 start-page: 424 year: 2005 end-page: 428 article-title: Any novelty in hippocampal formation and memory? publication-title: Curr Opin Neurol – volume: 30 start-page: 347 year: 1978 end-page: 354 article-title: The role of trace strength in recency and frequency judgments by amnesic and control subjects publication-title: Q J Exp Psychol – volume: 111 start-page: 667 year: 1997 end-page: 675 article-title: Impaired recognition memory in patients with lesions limited to the hippocampal formation publication-title: Behav Neurol – volume: 106 start-page: 5442 year: 2009 end-page: 5447 article-title: Impaired recollection but spared familiarity in patients with extended hippocampal system damage revealed by 3 convergent methods publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA – volume: 46 start-page: 3185 year: 2008 end-page: 3196 article-title: fMRI signal associated with memory strength in the medial temporal lobes: A meta‐analysis publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 19 start-page: 1939 year: 2004 end-page: 1949 article-title: Visual presentation of novel objects and new spatial arrangements of objects differentially activates the medial temporal lobe subareas in humans publication-title: Eur J Neurosci – volume: 5 start-page: 2525 year: 1994 end-page: 2528 article-title: Novelty encoding networks in the human brain: Positron emission tomography data publication-title: Neuroreport – start-page: 362 year: 1974 – volume: 133 start-page: 800 year: 2007 end-page: 832 article-title: Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: A review publication-title: Psychol Bull – volume: 109 start-page: 710 year: 2002 end-page: 721 article-title: Signal detection theory with finite mixture distributions: Theoretical developments with applications to recognition memory publication-title: Psychol Rev – year: 1958 – volume: 103 start-page: 9351 year: 2006b end-page: 9356 article-title: Item memory, source memory, and the medial temporal lobe: Concordant findings from fMRI and memory‐impaired patients publication-title: Proc Nat Acad Sci USA – volume: 34 start-page: 622 year: 1995 end-page: 643 article-title: The relation between remembering and knowing as bases for recognition: Effects of size congruency publication-title: J Mem Lang – volume: 17 start-page: 735 year: 2007 end-page: 748 article-title: Which computational mechanisms operate in the hippocampus during novelty detection? publication-title: Hippocampus – volume: 6 start-page: 9162 year: 2006 end-page: 9172 article-title: Differential encoding mechanisms for subsequent associative recognition and free recall publication-title: J Neurosci – article-title: Memory variability is due to the contribution of recollection and familiarity, not encoding variability publication-title: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn – volume: 46 start-page: 441 year: 2002 end-page: 517 article-title: The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research publication-title: J Mem Lang – volume: 71 start-page: 340 year: 2001 end-page: 346 article-title: Selective sparing of face learning in a global amnesic patient publication-title: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry – volume: 25 start-page: 747 year: 1997 end-page: 763 article-title: Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity publication-title: Mem Cogn – volume: 11 start-page: 16 year: 2008 end-page: 18 article-title: Recognition memory: Opposite effects of hippocampal damage on recollection and familiarity publication-title: Nat Neurol – volume: 31 start-page: 1045 year: 2003 end-page: 1051 article-title: Novelty effects on recollection and familiarity in recognition memory publication-title: Mem Cogn – volume: 15 start-page: 365 year: 2002 end-page: 374 article-title: Perirhinal cortex resolves feature ambiguity in complex visual discriminations publication-title: Eur J Neurosci – volume: 45 start-page: 412 year: 2007 end-page: 424 article-title: Electropysiological evidence for the influence of unitization on the processes engaged during episodic retrieval: Enhancing familiarity based remembering publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 125 start-page: 181 year: 1996 end-page: 194 article-title: Some problems with the process‐dissociation approach to memory publication-title: J Exp Psychol Gen – volume: 121 start-page: 331 year: 1997 end-page: 354 article-title: Toward a theory of episodic memory: The frontal lobes and autonoetic consciousness publication-title: Psychol Bull – volume: 11 start-page: 379 year: 2007 end-page: 386 article-title: Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: A three‐component model publication-title: Trends Cogn Sci – volume: 34 start-page: 730 year: 2008 end-page: 740 article-title: The effects of unitization on familiarity‐based source memory: Testing a behavioral prediction derived from neuroimaging data publication-title: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn – volume: 45 start-page: 592 year: 2009 end-page: 601 article-title: Impairment of verbal recollection following ischemic damage to the right anterior hippocampus publication-title: Cortex – volume: 46 start-page: 1050 year: 2008 end-page: 1059 article-title: Impaired memory for scenes but not faces in developmental hippocampal amnesia: A case study publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 18 start-page: 683 year: 2007 end-page: 696 article-title: Activating the medial temporal lobe during oddity judgment for faces and scenes publication-title: Cereb Cortex – volume: 6 start-page: 654 year: 1999 end-page: 661 article-title: Recognition memory for faces: When familiarity supports associative recogntion judgments publication-title: Psych Bull Rev – volume: 4 start-page: 137 year: 1985 end-page: 142 article-title: Frontal lobes and the temporal organization of memory publication-title: Hum Neurobiol – article-title: A medial temporal lobe division of labor: Insights from memory in aging and early Alzheimer's disease publication-title: Hippocampus – volume: 33 start-page: 151 year: 2005 end-page: 170 article-title: Support for a continuous (single‐process) model of recognition memory and source memory publication-title: Mem Cogn – volume: 38 start-page: 347 year: 2003 end-page: 358 article-title: Cortical analysis of visual context publication-title: Neuron – volume: 48 start-page: 2281 year: 2010 end-page: 2289 article-title: An animal model of amnesia that uses Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis to distinguish recollection from familiarity deficits in recognition memory publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 13 start-page: 357 year: 2001 end-page: 369 article-title: Preserved recognition in a case of developmental amnesia: Implications for the acquisition of semantic memory? publication-title: J Cogn Neurol – volume: 277 start-page: 376 year: 1997 end-page: 380 article-title: Differential effects of early hippocampal pathology on episodic and semantic memory publication-title: Science – volume: 35 start-page: 319 year: 1996 end-page: 334 article-title: The neuropsychology of memory illusions: False recall and recognition in amnesic patients publication-title: J Mem Lang – volume: 26 start-page: 1499 year: 2000 end-page: 1517 article-title: An analysis of signal detection and threshold models of source memory publication-title: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn – volume: 45 start-page: 2163 year: 2007 end-page: 2179 article-title: Neural correlates of recollection and familiarity: A review of neuroimaging and patient data publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 9 start-page: 495 year: 1999 end-page: 499 article-title: Impaired recognition memory on the doors and people test after damage limited to the hippocampal region publication-title: Hippocampus – volume: 18 start-page: 97 year: 2001 end-page: 123 article-title: Memory for single items, word pairs, and temporal order in a patient with selective hippocampal lesions publication-title: Cogn Neuropsychol – volume: 19 start-page: 23 year: 2008a end-page: 27 article-title: Recognition memory and prefrontal cortex: Dissociating recollection and familiarity processes using rTMS publication-title: Behav Neurol – volume: 20 start-page: 1341 year: 1994 end-page: 1354 article-title: Receiver‐operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual‐process model publication-title: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn – volume: 11 start-page: 1236 year: 2002 end-page: 1241 article-title: Effects of extensive temporal lobe damage or mild hypoxia on recollection and familiarity publication-title: Nat Neuro – volume: 356 start-page: 1363 year: 2001a end-page: 1374 article-title: Components of episodic memory: The contribution of recollection and familiarity publication-title: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B – volume: 43 start-page: 1810 year: 2005 end-page: 1823 article-title: Sparing of the familiarity component of recogntion memory in a patient with hippocampal pathology publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 44 start-page: 1859 year: 2006 end-page: 1865 article-title: The contribution of familiarity to associative memory in amnesia publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 26 start-page: 4596 year: 2006 end-page: 4601 article-title: Working memory for conjunctions relies on the medial temporal lobe publication-title: J Neurosci – volume: 18 start-page: 469 year: 2008b end-page: 480 article-title: Recollection and familiarity in hippocampal amnesia publication-title: Hippocampus – volume: 59 start-page: 554 year: 2008 end-page: 560 article-title: Perirhinal cortex supports encoding and familiarity‐based recognition of novel associations publication-title: Neuron – volume: 13 start-page: 644 year: 2006a end-page: 649 article-title: Single‐item memory, associative memory, and the human hippocampus publication-title: Learn Mem – volume: 4 start-page: 393 year: 2004 end-page: 400 article-title: Mild hypoxia disrupts recollection, not familiarity publication-title: Cog Affec Behav Neurol – volume: 1107 start-page: 161 year: 2006 end-page: 176 article-title: Source memory retrieval is affected by aging and prefrontal lesions: Behavioral and ERP evidence publication-title: Brain Res – volume: 19 start-page: 773 year: 2009 end-page: 778 article-title: Evidence for a direct relationship between repetition suppression in human perirhinal cortex and priming publication-title: Hippocampus – volume: 114 start-page: 188 year: 2007 end-page: 202 article-title: Moving beyond pure signal‐detection models: Comment on Wixted publication-title: Psychol Rev – volume: 17 start-page: 192 year: 2007 end-page: 200 article-title: Effect of unitization on associative recognition in amnesia publication-title: Hippocampus – volume: 27 start-page: 701 year: 2001 end-page: 722 article-title: On the nature of associative information in recognition memory publication-title: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn – volume: 7 start-page: 5 year: 1993 end-page: 13 article-title: The status of recognition memory in amnesia publication-title: Neuropsychology – volume: 30 start-page: 123 year: 2007 end-page: 152 article-title: The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory publication-title: Annu Rev Neurosci – volume: 36 start-page: 785 year: 1998 end-page: 796 article-title: Recall and recognition memory in patients with focal frontal, temporal lobe and diencephalic lesions publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 57 start-page: 81 year: 2007 end-page: 100 article-title: The role of noncriterial recollection in estimating recollection and familiarity publication-title: J Mem Lang – volume: 12 start-page: 865 year: 2005 end-page: 873 article-title: The remember response: Subject to bias, graded, and not a process‐pure indicator of recollection publication-title: Psychon Bull Rev – volume: 30 start-page: 513 year: 1991 end-page: 541 article-title: A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory publication-title: J Mem Lang – volume: 45 start-page: 2467 year: 2007 end-page: 2479 article-title: Bilateral damage to the mammillo‐thalamic tract impairs recollection but not familiarity in the recognition process: A single case investigation publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 46 start-page: 3124 year: 2008 end-page: 3132 article-title: Effect of frontal lobe lesions on the recollection and familiarity components of recognition memory publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 43 start-page: 1 year: 2005b end-page: 11 article-title: Perceptual deficits in amnesia: Challenging the medial temporal lobe ‘mnemonic’ view publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 22 start-page: 109 year: 2010 end-page: 123 article-title: In search of recollection and familiarity signals in the hippocampus publication-title: J Cogn Neurol – volume: 28 start-page: 10541 year: 2008 end-page: 10548 article-title: Activity in the medial temporal lobe predicts memory strength, whereas activity in the prefrontal cortex predicts recollection publication-title: J Neurosci – volume: 22 start-page: 1808 year: 2010 end-page: 1818 article-title: Medial temporal lobe activity during source retrieval reflects information type, not memory strength publication-title: J Cognitive Neurosci – volume: 15 start-page: 782 year: 2005a end-page: 797 article-title: Specialization in the medial temporal lobe for processing of objects and scenes publication-title: Hippocampus – volume: 114 start-page: 152 year: 2007 end-page: 176 article-title: Dual‐process theory and signal‐detection theory of recognition memory publication-title: Psychol Rev – volume: 21 start-page: 1993 year: 2005 end-page: 1999 article-title: Recapitulating emotional context: Activity of amygdala, hippocampus and fusiform cortex during recollection and familiarity publication-title: Eur J Neurosci – volume: 22 start-page: 425 year: 1999 end-page: 44 article-title: Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal anterior thalamic axis publication-title: Behav Brain Sci – volume: 10 start-page: 455 year: 2006 end-page: 463 article-title: Interleaving brain systems for episodic and recognition memory publication-title: Trends Cogn Sci – volume: 13 start-page: 47 year: 2009 end-page: 54 article-title: Novelty signals: A window into hippocampal information processing publication-title: Trends Cogn Sci – volume: 45 start-page: 1160 year: 2007 end-page: 1171 article-title: Fractionation of memory in medial temporal lobe amnesia publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 34 start-page: 189 year: 1997 end-page: 206 article-title: Confabulation, memory deficits, and frontal dysfunction publication-title: Brain Cogn – volume: 49 start-page: 459 year: 2006 end-page: 466 article-title: The hippocampus supports both the recollection and the familiarity components of recognition memory publication-title: Neuron – volume: 2 start-page: 174 year: 2002 end-page: 186 article-title: Neuropsychological correlates of recollection and familiarity in normal aging publication-title: Cogn Affect Behav Neurol – volume: 102 start-page: 2626 year: 2005 end-page: 2631 article-title: Remembering one year later: Role of the amygdala and the medial temporal lobe memory system in retrieving emotional memories publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA – volume: 24 start-page: 523 year: 1996 end-page: 533 article-title: The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing publication-title: Mem Cogn – volume: 11 start-page: 454 year: 2000 end-page: 461 article-title: Amnesia is a deficit in relational memory publication-title: Psychol Sci – volume: 42 start-page: 426 year: 2004 end-page: 433 article-title: Recognition memory for single items and for associations in amnesic patients publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 35 start-page: 5 year: 1997 end-page: 25 article-title: The role of the temporal lobes in recognizing visuospatial materials: Remembering versus knowing publication-title: Brain Cogn – volume: 13 start-page: 638 year: 2006 end-page: 643 article-title: Distinct roles for medial temporal lobe structures in memory for objects and their locations publication-title: Learn Mem – volume: 44 start-page: 489 year: 2006 end-page: 506 article-title: Recollection and familiarity in dense hippocampal amnesia: A case study publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 13 start-page: 281 year: 2003 end-page: 292 article-title: Hippocampal damage equally impairs memory for single items and memory for conjunctions publication-title: Hippocampus – volume: 11 start-page: 331 year: 1997 end-page: 342 article-title: Illusory memories in amnesic patients: Conceptual and perceptual false recognition publication-title: Neuropsychology – volume: 48 start-page: 831 year: 2010 end-page: 853 article-title: Going beyond LTM in the MTL: A synthesis of neuropsychological and neuroimaging findings on the role of the medial temporal lobe in memory and perception publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 130 start-page: 361 year: 2001b end-page: 379 article-title: Consciousness, control and confidence: The three Cs of recognition memory publication-title: J Exp Psychol Gen – volume: 15 start-page: 326 year: 2005 end-page: 332 article-title: Conceptual and perceptual novelty effects in human medial temporal cortex publication-title: Hippocampus – volume: 16 start-page: 15 year: 2004 end-page: 23 article-title: The von Restorff effect in amnesia: The contribution of the hippocampal system to novelty‐related memory enhancements publication-title: J Cogn Neurosci – volume: 38 start-page: 410 year: 2000 end-page: 425 article-title: A comparison of egocentric and allocentric spatial memory in a patient with selective hippocampal damage publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 15 start-page: 203 year: 2005 end-page: 215 article-title: Item recognition is less impaired than recall and associative recognition in a patient with selective hippocampal damage publication-title: Hippocampus – volume: 42 start-page: 672 year: 2004 end-page: 691 article-title: Recall and recogntion in mild hypoxia: Using covariance structural modeling to test competing theories of explicit memory publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 111 start-page: 588 year: 2004 end-page: 616 article-title: Sum‐difference theory of remembering and knowing: A two‐dimensional signal detection model publication-title: Psychol Rev – volume: 107 start-page: 344 year: 2010 end-page: 348 article-title: A demonstration that the hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity publication-title: Proc Nat Acad Sci USA – volume: 26 start-page: 1 year: 1985 end-page: 12 article-title: Memory and consciousness publication-title: Can Psychol – volume: 25 start-page: 8333 year: 2005 end-page: 8337 article-title: Effects of unilateral prefrontal lesions on familiarity, recollection, and source memory publication-title: J Neurosci – volume: 28 start-page: 13428 year: 2008 end-page: 13434 article-title: Medial prefrontal cortex supports recollection, but not familiarity, in the rat publication-title: J Neurosci – volume: 39 start-page: 827 year: 2003 end-page: 846 article-title: Remember and knowing in patients with frontal lobe lesions publication-title: Cortex – volume: 47 start-page: 2207 year: 2009 end-page: 2210 article-title: Dissociation between recognition and recall in developmental amnesia publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 10 start-page: 330 year: 2004 end-page: 344 article-title: Dissociation between recall and recognition memory performance in an amnesic patient with hippocampal damage following carbon monoxide poisoning publication-title: Neurocase – volume: 38 start-page: 381 year: 1998 end-page: 400 article-title: Distinctiveness in recognition and free recall: The role of recollection in the rejection of the familiar publication-title: J Mem Lang – volume: 11 start-page: 126 year: 2007 end-page: 135 article-title: Associative memory and the medial temporal lobes publication-title: Trends Cogn Sci – volume: 26 start-page: 294 year: 2000 end-page: 320 article-title: A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember/know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm publication-title: J Exp Psychol Learn – volume: 2 start-page: 51 year: 2001 end-page: 61 article-title: Recognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus? publication-title: Nat Rev Neurosci – volume: 1 start-page: 525 year: 1995 end-page: 536 article-title: Frontal lobe damage produces episodic memory impairment publication-title: J Int Neuropsychol Soc – volume: 26 start-page: 8352 year: 2006 end-page: 8359 article-title: The long and the short of it: Relational memory impairments in amnesia, even at short lags publication-title: J Neurosci – volume: 12 start-page: 913 year: 2000 end-page: 923 article-title: Confidence in recognition memory for words: Dissociating right prefrontal roles in episodic retrieval publication-title: J Cogn Neurosci – volume: 42 start-page: 2 end-page: 13 article-title: Dissociable correlates of recollection and familiarity within the medial temporal lobes publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 18 start-page: 679 year: 2008 end-page: 691 article-title: Two case studies illustrating how relatively selective hippocampal lesions in humans can have quite different effects on memory publication-title: Hippocampus – volume: 15 start-page: 60 year: 2009 end-page: 65 article-title: Impairment of recollection but not familiarity in a case of developmental amnesia publication-title: Neurocase – volume: 45 start-page: 50 year: 2008 end-page: 59 article-title: Association and not semantic relationships elicit the N400 effect: Electrophysiological evidence from an explicit language comprehension task publication-title: Psychophysiology – volume: 45 start-page: 1232 year: 2007 end-page: 1246 article-title: Recall and recognition memory in amnesia: Patients with hippocampal, medial temporal, temporal lobe or frontal pathology publication-title: Neuropsychologia – volume: 20 start-page: 509 year: 2009 end-page: 515 article-title: Recollection is a continuous process: Implications for dual‐process theories of recognition memory publication-title: Psychol Sci – volume: 60 start-page: 181 year: 1953 end-page: 188 article-title: Do incorrectly perceived tachistoscopic stimuli convey some information? publication-title: Psychol Rev – volume: 87 start-page: 252 year: 1980 end-page: 271 article-title: Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence publication-title: Psychol Rev – volume: 12 start-page: 325 year: 2002 end-page: 340 article-title: Relative sparing of item recognition memory in a patient with adult‐onset damage limited to the hippocampus publication-title: Hippocampus – volume: 5 start-page: 131 year: 1996 end-page: 141 article-title: Noncriterial recollection: Familiarity as automatic, irrelevant recollection publication-title: Conscious Cogn – volume: 25 start-page: 513 year: 1999 end-page: 451 article-title: The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source memory judgments: A formal dual‐process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics publication-title: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn – volume: 104 start-page: 16382 year: 2007 end-page: 16387 article-title: Impaired familiarity with preserved recollection after anterior temporal‐lobe resection that spares hippocampus publication-title: Proc Nat Acad Sci USA – ident: e_1_2_8_3_1 doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99002034 – ident: e_1_2_8_83_1 doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a070866 – ident: e_1_2_8_103_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.022 – ident: e_1_2_8_121_1 doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.013 – ident: e_1_2_8_118_1 doi: 10.1002/hipo.10085 – ident: e_1_2_8_51_1 doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00099-8 – ident: e_1_2_8_109_1 doi: 10.1038/nn2016 – ident: e_1_2_8_63_1 doi: 10.1162/089892904322755511 – ident: e_1_2_8_102_1 doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.2.294 – ident: e_1_2_8_53_1 doi: 10.1002/hipo.20427 – ident: e_1_2_8_20_1 doi: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01851.x – ident: e_1_2_8_43_1 doi: 10.1002/hipo.20226 – ident: e_1_2_8_13_1 doi: 10.1006/brcg.1997.0902 – ident: e_1_2_8_37_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094328 – ident: e_1_2_8_32_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409848102 – ident: e_1_2_8_18_1 doi: 10.1101/lm.251906 – ident: e_1_2_8_73_1 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm104 – ident: e_1_2_8_144_1 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0939 – ident: e_1_2_8_59_1 doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.27.3.701 – ident: e_1_2_8_22_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.03.025 – ident: e_1_2_8_2_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.038 – ident: e_1_2_8_54_1 doi: 10.1080/14640747808400681 – ident: e_1_2_8_94_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.035 – ident: e_1_2_8_15_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705273104 – ident: e_1_2_8_88_1 doi: 10.1002/hipo.20053 – ident: e_1_2_8_122_1 doi: 10.1037/h0080017 – ident: e_1_2_8_57_1 doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(89)90184-X – ident: e_1_2_8_19_1 doi: 10.1002/hipo.20320 – ident: e_1_2_8_119_1 doi: 10.1101/lm.51802 – ident: e_1_2_8_62_1 doi: 10.3758/BF03196125 – ident: e_1_2_8_71_1 doi: 10.1002/hipo.20101 – ident: e_1_2_8_79_1 doi: 10.1080/02643290125897 – ident: e_1_2_8_137_1 doi: 10.1017/S1355617700000655 – ident: e_1_2_8_50_1 doi: 10.1162/08989290051137468 – ident: e_1_2_8_46_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602716103 – ident: e_1_2_8_33_1 doi: 10.3758/BF03200940 – ident: e_1_2_8_45_1 doi: 10.1101/lm.258406 – ident: e_1_2_8_101_1 doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.111.4.667 – ident: e_1_2_8_23_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.05.014 – ident: e_1_2_8_112_1 doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.117.3.526 – ident: e_1_2_8_133_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.12.020 – ident: e_1_2_8_152_1 doi: 10.1038/nn961 – ident: e_1_2_8_129_1 doi: 10.1126/science.277.5324.376 – ident: e_1_2_8_36_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.015 – ident: e_1_2_8_61_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912543107 – volume: 7 start-page: 5 year: 1993 ident: e_1_2_8_130_1 article-title: The status of recognition memory in amnesia publication-title: Neuropsychology doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.7.1.5 – ident: e_1_2_8_149_1 doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.800 – ident: e_1_2_8_96_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.09.008 – ident: e_1_2_8_125_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.10.003 – ident: e_1_2_8_128_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812097106 – ident: e_1_2_8_55_1 doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90025-F – ident: e_1_2_8_105_1 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.3.588 – ident: e_1_2_8_11_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.10.011 – volume: 21 start-page: 699 year: 1995 ident: e_1_2_8_65_1 article-title: Remembering and knowing: Two different expression of declarative memory publication-title: J Exp Pychol Learn Mem Cogn doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.699 – volume: 87 start-page: 252 year: 1980 ident: e_1_2_8_76_1 article-title: Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence publication-title: Psychol Rev doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.252 – ident: e_1_2_8_93_1 doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.09.001 – ident: e_1_2_8_132_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.08.025 – volume: 42 start-page: 2 ident: e_1_2_8_99_1 article-title: Dissociable correlates of recollection and familiarity within the medial temporal lobes publication-title: Neuropsychologia doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.07.006 – ident: e_1_2_8_28_1 doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21335 – ident: e_1_2_8_140_1 article-title: A medial temporal lobe division of labor: Insights from memory in aging and early Alzheimer's disease publication-title: Hippocampus – volume-title: Recognition memory and the operating characteristic. USAF Tech Note. No. 58–51, 32 year: 1958 ident: e_1_2_8_38_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_106_1 doi: 10.3758/BF03196778 – ident: e_1_2_8_75_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.003 – ident: e_1_2_8_131_1 doi: 10.1002/hipo.20608 – ident: e_1_2_8_26_1 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.08.001 – ident: e_1_2_8_68_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.10.005 – ident: e_1_2_8_60_1 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3456-08.2008 – ident: e_1_2_8_66_1 article-title: Memory variability is due to the contribution of recollection and familiarity, not encoding variability publication-title: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn – ident: e_1_2_8_141_1 doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1341 – ident: e_1_2_8_111_1 doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.11.3.331 – ident: e_1_2_8_52_1 doi: 10.1002/hipo.20046 – ident: e_1_2_8_8_1 doi: 10.1162/08989290151137403 – ident: e_1_2_8_10_1 doi: 10.1080/13554790490507650 – ident: e_1_2_8_47_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.01.001 – ident: e_1_2_8_81_1 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.003 – ident: e_1_2_8_82_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02324.x – ident: e_1_2_8_86_1 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.4.611 – ident: e_1_2_8_97_1 doi: 10.1002/hipo.20257 – ident: e_1_2_8_114_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.03.007 – ident: e_1_2_8_58_1 doi: 10.1006/brcg.1997.0873 – ident: e_1_2_8_80_1 doi: 10.1002/hipo.1111 – ident: e_1_2_8_146_1 doi: 10.1006/jmla.2002.2864 – ident: e_1_2_8_44_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.03.004 – ident: e_1_2_8_70_1 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.004 – ident: e_1_2_8_41_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04033.x – start-page: 239 volume-title: Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology year: 1974 ident: e_1_2_8_7_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_49_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.07.035 – ident: e_1_2_8_27_1 doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.730 – ident: e_1_2_8_151_1 doi: 10.3758/BF03212975 – ident: e_1_2_8_74_1 doi: 10.1002/hipo.20515 – ident: e_1_2_8_42_1 doi: 10.1038/nature02853 – ident: e_1_2_8_5_1 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.003 – ident: e_1_2_8_78_1 doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01147-9 – ident: e_1_2_8_113_1 doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(90)90004-8 – ident: e_1_2_8_14_1 doi: 10.1177/1073858407299290 – ident: e_1_2_8_87_1 doi: 10.1097/01.wco.0000168080.99730.1c – ident: e_1_2_8_143_1 doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.6.1415 – ident: e_1_2_8_154_1 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5295-04.2005 – ident: e_1_2_8_135_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_138_1 doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.331 – ident: e_1_2_8_104_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00598.x – ident: e_1_2_8_123_1 doi: 10.3758/BF03210977 – ident: e_1_2_8_69_1 doi: 10.1002/hipo.20326 – ident: e_1_2_8_110_1 doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.0018 – ident: e_1_2_8_117_1 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2877-06.2006 – ident: e_1_2_8_34_1 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1392-05.2005 – ident: e_1_2_8_139_1 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.152 – ident: e_1_2_8_39_1 doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.752 – ident: e_1_2_8_30_1 doi: 10.1162/0898929041502751 – ident: e_1_2_8_48_1 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5222-05.2006 – ident: e_1_2_8_147_1 doi: 10.1006/jmla.1995.1028 – ident: e_1_2_8_77_1 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1063(1999)9:5<495::AID-HIPO2>3.0.CO;2-O – ident: e_1_2_8_4_1 doi: 10.1038/35049064 – ident: e_1_2_8_31_1 doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.125.2.181 – ident: e_1_2_8_127_1 doi: 10.1002/hipo.20412 – volume: 29 start-page: 14987 ident: e_1_2_8_107_1 article-title: Fornix microstructure correlates with recollection but not familiarity memory publication-title: J Neurosci doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4707-09.2009 – ident: e_1_2_8_16_1 doi: 10.1080/13554790802613025 – start-page: 702 volume-title: Signal Detection and Recognition by Human Observers: Contemporary Readings year: 1964 ident: e_1_2_8_120_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_98_1 doi: 10.1038/nrn1052 – volume: 4 start-page: 137 year: 1985 ident: e_1_2_8_84_1 article-title: Frontal lobes and the temporal organization of memory publication-title: Hum Neurobiol – ident: e_1_2_8_91_1 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.188 – ident: e_1_2_8_155_1 doi: 10.1002/hipo.20341 – ident: e_1_2_8_12_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.11.007 – ident: e_1_2_8_100_1 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.518 – ident: e_1_2_8_24_1 doi: 10.3758/CABN.2.2.174 – start-page: 362 volume-title: Human Memory: Theory and Data year: 1974 ident: e_1_2_8_85_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_17_1 doi: 10.1037/h0054901 – ident: e_1_2_8_29_1 doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2554 – ident: e_1_2_8_124_1 doi: 10.1097/00001756-199412000-00030 – ident: e_1_2_8_67_1 doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00167-X – ident: e_1_2_8_25_1 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.710 – ident: e_1_2_8_108_1 doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00288 – ident: e_1_2_8_56_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.08.019 – ident: e_1_2_8_9_1 doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00167-3 – ident: e_1_2_8_64_1 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5507-08.2009 – ident: e_1_2_8_153_1 doi: 10.3758/CABN.4.3.393 – ident: e_1_2_8_92_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905505106 – ident: e_1_2_8_95_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03282.x – ident: e_1_2_8_115_1 doi: 10.3758/BF03195305 – volume: 39 start-page: 827 year: 2003 ident: e_1_2_8_136_1 article-title: Remember and knowing in patients with frontal lobe lesions publication-title: Cortex doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70866-9 – ident: e_1_2_8_72_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.07.017 – ident: e_1_2_8_142_1 doi: 10.3758/BF03211318 – ident: e_1_2_8_150_1 doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.12.3.323 – ident: e_1_2_8_40_1 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3662-08.2008 – ident: e_1_2_8_145_1 doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.361 – ident: e_1_2_8_90_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.03.003 – ident: e_1_2_8_126_1 doi: 10.1155/2008/568057 – ident: e_1_2_8_21_1 doi: 10.1136/jnnp.71.3.340 – ident: e_1_2_8_35_1 doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.524 – ident: e_1_2_8_89_1 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1923-05.2006 – ident: e_1_2_8_116_1 doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1499 – ident: e_1_2_8_148_1 doi: 10.1006/ccog.1996.0008 – ident: e_1_2_8_6_1 doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.01.019 – ident: e_1_2_8_134_1 doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21190 |
| SSID | ssj0011500 |
| Score | 2.5185363 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | It is well accepted that recognition memory reflects the contribution of two separable memory retrieval processes, namely recollection and familiarity.... |
| SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref wiley istex |
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 1178 |
| SubjectTerms | Amnesia - physiopathology Animals Association Learning - physiology dual-process hippocampus Hippocampus - blood supply Hippocampus - physiology Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Mental Recall - physiology Models, Psychological recognition Recognition, Psychology - physiology ROC Curve Signal Detection, Psychological signal-detection threshold |
| Title | Recollection and familiarity: Examining controversial assumptions and new directions |
| URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-3019W9W0-S/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fhipo.20864 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20848606 https://www.proquest.com/docview/758835779 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4251874 |
| Volume | 20 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVWIB databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Core collection (SURFmarket) issn: 1050-9631 databaseCode: DR2 dateStart: 19960101 customDbUrl: isFulltext: true eissn: 1098-1063 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0011500 providerName: Wiley-Blackwell |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3rS9xAEB9EofRLfbZGa1lQBIVoLq9NSr9IUU_BBz44v5RlN9ngoUbRO7D-9c7M3sVeFaH9duQmCbuZx292Z38DsBIYk0oTRn5eakxQSrT0TJaJr22E8VLHRczcnQeHafs83r9ILsbgx_AsjOOHaBbcyDLYX5OBa_Ow-UIaetm9o8N7WUpkoK0o4T3ak4Y7ipCOoyJIAh-1rNVwk4abL7eORKMJmtjHt6Dm64rJP5Esh6KdSfg1HISrQLna6PfMRvH0F7_j_45yCj4NMKrYcko1DWO2noHZrRrz85vfYlVw1Sgvx8_Ah4PB5vwsnFEqy9sA-K2FrkvBqyddTf3xvovtR33D3SiEK4_nehB8DaJ3VClWf74Jcb5wgZYuzcH5zvbZz7Y_aNrgF5jTxj4G_FDbCt0Epo4x0R2aivp7pGFujcH0kRgJrdYyKksZmLiIsiqpKnS5mBqaMIg-w3h9W9t5EGFErZGzVpEnRUy4y6Q2zXIdIeaSNig8WBt-PFUMGM2psca1clzMoaLZUzx7Hiw3sneOx-NNqVXWgUZE319R5ZtMVOdwV6EzzDt5J1CnHoihkii0R9pk0bW97T8ozL8Q1EqZe_DF6UzzsJB6F2DC6IEc0aZGgKi-R_-pu5dM-Y2elZonerDOyvLOEFR77_iIfy38i_AifOS6CD5l-RXGe_d9u4Rwq2e-sVk9A3R_JgM |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3dT9RAEJ8oJMqLfAlWRTaRkGhSKP3a1jei4KHcQfTI8bbZbbfhghQCdwny1zszW4qHxETfmnbaptv5-M3u7G8A1gJjUmnCyM9LjQlKiZaeyTLxtY0wXuq4iJm7s9tLO0fxl-PkuKnNob0wjh-inXAjy2B_TQZOE9Kbd6yhJ8ML2r2XpfFjmKYFOrLLT99a9ijCOo6MIAl81LOtlp003Ly7dyIeTdPQXj8ENv-smfwdy3Iw2p11HVevmMOQalBON8Yjs1Hc3GN4_O_vnINnDUwV206v5uGRrRdgcbvGFP3sp1gXXDjKM_IL8KTbrM8vQp-yWV4JwN8tdF0KnkAZamqR90HsXOszbkghXIU8l4TgaxDAo1axBfBNCPWFi7V06jkc7e70P3b8pm-DX2BaG_sY80NtK_QUmD3GxHhoKmrxkYa5NQYzSCIltFrLqCxlYOIiyqqkqtDrYnZowiBagqn6vLYvQIQRdUfOtoo8KWKCXia1aZbrCGGXtEHhwbvbv6eKhtScemv8UI6OOVQ0eopHz4O3reyFo_J4UGqdlaAV0ZenVPwmEzXofVboD_NBPgjUdw_ErZYoNElaZ9G1PR9fKUzBENdKmXuw7JSmfVhI7QswZ_RATqhTK0Bs35NX6uEJs36jc6X-iR68Z235yyeozt7hAR-9_BfhVXja6Xf31f5e7-srmOEyCd50-RqmRpdju4Loa2TesI39ArevKh8 |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3rT9RAEJ8gJMQvPsBHfeAmGhJNCqXddlviF4Kch8pJFHJ8IZvddhsuSLngXYL-9czM3hVPiYl-u_SmbXY7j9_szv4G4FVkbaZsnIRFZTBBqdDSc1WloXEJxksjS8ncnXu9rHsoPxylR3PwdnoWxvNDtAtuZBnsr8nAh1W9fk0aejIY0uG9PJO3YEFmmF4RJPrSkkcR1PFcBGkUoppttOSk8fr1vTPhaIFm9vImrPlnyeSvUJZjUecuHE9H4UtQTtfGI7tW_vyN4PF_h3kP7kxAqtjyWnUf5lyzBMtbDSboZz_EquCyUV6PX4LFvcnu_DIcUC7L-wD4sYVpKsHLJwNDDfI2xc6lOeN2FMLXx3NBCL4G4TvqFOs_34RAX_hIS5cewGFn52C7G066NoQlJrUyxIgfG1ejn8DcURLfoa2pwUcWF85azB-JktAZo5KqUpGVZZLXaV2jz8Xc0MZR8hDmm_PGPQYRJ9QbOd8oi7SUBLxs5rK8MAmCLuWiMoDX04-nywmlOXXW-KY9GXOsafY0z14AL1vZoSfyuFFqlXWgFTEXp1T6plLd773X6A2LftGP9NcAxFRJNBok7bKYxp2Pv2tMwBDVKlUE8MjrTPuwmJoXYMYYgJrRplaAuL5n_2kGJ8z5ja6VuicG8IaV5S9D0N3d_c_868m_CL-Axf13Hf1pt_fxKdzmGgk-cfkM5kcXY_ccodfIrrCFXQEfQijO |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Recollection+and+familiarity%3A+Examining+controversial+assumptions+and+new+directions&rft.jtitle=Hippocampus&rft.au=Yonelinas%2C+Andrew+P.&rft.au=Aly%2C+Mariam&rft.au=Wang%2C+Wei%E2%80%90Chun&rft.au=Koen%2C+Joshua+D.&rft.date=2010-11-01&rft.pub=Wiley+Subscription+Services%2C+Inc.%2C+A+Wiley+Company&rft.issn=1050-9631&rft.eissn=1098-1063&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1178&rft.epage=1194&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fhipo.20864&rft.externalDBID=10.1002%252Fhipo.20864&rft.externalDocID=HIPO20864 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1050-9631&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1050-9631&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1050-9631&client=summon |