Association of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms with DNA damage in coal-tar workers

DNA damage was evaluated by alkaline comet assay in peripheral blood lymphocytes of 115 coal-tar workers occupationally exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and 105 control subjects. The effect of polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferase ( GST) genotypes on the DNA damage was assesse...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Science of the total environment Vol. 409; no. 20; pp. 4465 - 4469
Main Authors Giri, Shiv Kumar, Anita Yadav, Kumar, Anil, Dev, Kapil, Gupta, Ranjan, Aggarwal, Neeraj, Seth, Neena, Gautam, Sanjeev Kumar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier B.V 15.09.2011
Elsevier
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0048-9697
1879-1026
1879-1026
DOI10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.07.009

Cover

More Information
Summary:DNA damage was evaluated by alkaline comet assay in peripheral blood lymphocytes of 115 coal-tar workers occupationally exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and 105 control subjects. The effect of polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferase ( GST) genotypes on the DNA damage was assessed. The mean tail moment (TM) value in the coal-tar workers was significantly higher as compared to the control subjects (12.06 ± 0.55 versus 0.44 ± 0.31; P < 0.05). No significant association ( P > 0.05) between the GSTT1 and GSTM1 genotypes and the TM values was found, however highest mean rank TM value was reported in GSTM1 null and GSTT1 null genotypes in both control and exposed subjects. Our results suggest that there is increased DNA damage in coal-tar workers due to PAHs exposure. Polymorphisms in GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes do not show significant effect ( P > 0.05) on DNA damage. ► Coal-tar workers show high DNA damage in Peripheral blood lymphocytes. ► Exposed subjects with long exposure duration show more DNA damage. ► GSTM1 and GSTT1 positive genotypes are more prevalent among studied subjects. ► Polymorphisms in GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes do not show significant effect on DNA damage.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.07.009
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0048-9697
1879-1026
1879-1026
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.07.009