Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion without plate (ACDFWP) versus anterior cervical disc arthroplasty (ACDA) for cervical spondylosis: A meta-analysis and literature review

This meta-analysis compared the clinical outcomes between two alternative surgeries for patients with cervical spondylosis, namely anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) without plate (ACDFWP) vs. anterior cervical disc arthroplasty (ACDA). We searched databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIntractable & Rare Diseases Research Vol. 11; no. 3; pp. 105 - 112
Main Authors Li, Sihan, Song, Hongmei, Peng, Jiajie, Zheng, Rong, Li, Pengfei, Lin, Xiangying, Zhong, Degui, Huang, Minghan, Asakawa, Tetsuya
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published International Research and Cooperation Association for Bio & Socio-Sciences Advancement 01.08.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2186-3644
2186-361X
2186-361X
DOI10.5582/irdr.2022.01080

Cover

More Information
Summary:This meta-analysis compared the clinical outcomes between two alternative surgeries for patients with cervical spondylosis, namely anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) without plate (ACDFWP) vs. anterior cervical disc arthroplasty (ACDA). We searched databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Web of Science (firstly available-2019). A standard meta-analysis was performed with the included studies. A Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool was used for the evaluation of the study quality of nonrandomized-controlled trials (nRCTs), while a Risk of Bias (RoB) battery was used for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Eight studies involving 640 patients were included. No significant difference was found in the indices of Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, Visual Analog Score (VAS), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, operative time, blood loss, Swallowing Quality of Life Score (SWAL-QL), and complications. Cervical alignment was significantly better in the ACDFWP than in ACDA (mean difference (MD) = −0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) [−1.11, −0.23], P = 0.003, I2 = 20%). Although the alternative ACDFWP was slightly superior in terms of the index of cervical alignment, the limited research on this subject present insufficient evidence. Further well-designed studies are warranted in the future.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
These authors contributed equally to this work.
ISSN:2186-3644
2186-361X
2186-361X
DOI:10.5582/irdr.2022.01080