Early Virologic Nonresponse to Tenofovir, Abacavir, and Lamivudine in HIV-Infected Antiretroviral-Naive Subjects

BackgroundAntiretroviral combinations that reduce the number of pills and dosing frequency have the potential to simplify therapy. We compared 2 regimens dosed as 2 pills once daily MethodsThis was a randomized, open-label, multicenter study of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus efavirenz, both ad...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of infectious diseases Vol. 192; no. 11; pp. 1921 - 1930
Main Authors Gallant, Joel E., Rodriguez, Allan E., Weinberg, Winkler G., Young, Benjamin, Berger, Daniel S., Lim, Michael L., Liao, Qiming, Ross, Lisa, Johnson, Judy, Shaefer, Mark S.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States The University of Chicago Press 01.12.2005
University of Chicago Press
Oxford University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-1899
1537-6613
DOI10.1086/498069

Cover

More Information
Summary:BackgroundAntiretroviral combinations that reduce the number of pills and dosing frequency have the potential to simplify therapy. We compared 2 regimens dosed as 2 pills once daily MethodsThis was a randomized, open-label, multicenter study of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus efavirenz, both administered once daily with the abacavir/lamivudine fixed-dose combination in treatment-naive human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)–infected subjects. After reports of early nonresponse, an unplanned interim analysis was performed. Virologic nonresponse was defined as (1) a <2.0-log10 copies/mL decrease in HIV-1 RNA level by week 8, (2) an HIV-1 RNA rebound of ⩾1.0 log10 copies/mL above the nadir, or (3) for subjects with 2 consecutive HIV-1 RNA measurements <50 copies/mL, a subsequent increase to >400 copies/mL on 2 consecutive occasions ResultsWe randomized 340 subjects. Median baseline HIV-1 RNA level and CD4+ cell count were 4.7 log10 copies/mL and 251 cells/mm3, respectively; 194 subjects with HIV-1 RNA data from ⩾8 weeks were included in the interim analysis. Virologic nonresponse occurred in 50 (49%) of 102 subjects in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate arm, compared with 5 (5%) of 92 of subjects in the efavirenz arm (P<.001). Within 12 weeks, viral genotypes for nonresponders in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate arm showed M184V or I/M/V mixtures in 40 (98%) of 41 subjects and K65R and M184V or mixtures in 22 (54%) of 41 subjects. The protocol was immediately amended to modify the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate arm. The efavirenz arm continued unchanged; after 48 weeks, 120 (71%) of 169 subjects achieved HIV-1 RNA levels <50 copies/mL ConclusionThe tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/abacavir/lamivudine regimen resulted in an unexpected and unacceptably high rate of nonresponse and incidence of K65R and M184V/I. This 3-drug regimen should not be used
Bibliography:istex:F197875C1D7F7F6E5C77E6912DD0FCD3D8EC686B
ark:/67375/HXZ-1T4JP4QP-N
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-General Information-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Feature-1
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0022-1899
1537-6613
DOI:10.1086/498069