Moving toward a common goal via cross-sector collaboration: lessons learned from SARS to COVID-19 in Singapore
Background The spread of COVID-19 has taken a toll on many countries and its healthcare system over the last two years. Governments have sought to mitigate the repercussions of the pandemic by implementing aggressive top-down control measures and introducing immense fiscal spending. Singapore is no...
Saved in:
| Published in | Globalization and health Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 1 - 18 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
London
BioMed Central
21.09.2022
BMC |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1744-8603 1744-8603 |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12992-022-00873-x |
Cover
| Abstract | Background
The spread of COVID-19 has taken a toll on many countries and its healthcare system over the last two years. Governments have sought to mitigate the repercussions of the pandemic by implementing aggressive top-down control measures and introducing immense fiscal spending. Singapore is no exception to this trend. Owing to a whole-of-society approach, Singapore is still being lauded globally for its relatively successful record at controlling both community and trans-border spread. One notable effort by the Singapore government has taken place through its cross-sectoral collaborative partnerships with the private stakeholders behind the success.
Methods/results
In an attempt to better explain Singapore’s robust yet strategic response to COVID-19, this study focuses on how the experience of the SARS outbreak has informed the government’s collaborative efforts with other stakeholders in society, beyond mere transnational cooperation. Taking a comparative case study approach in the specific context of Singapore, we perform a content analysis of related government documents, mainstream newspaper articles, and academic journal articles in an
inductive
manner. By closely comparing two global healthcare outbreaks, we note four differences in approach. First, during the COVID-19 pandemic, Singapore has focused on securing sufficient essential healthcare resources with contingency plans to strengthen preparedness. Second, the government has actively harnessed the capacity of private entities to promote the resilience of the healthcare system and the community. Third, Singapore’s management policies have been made not only in a top-down, centralized style during the initial response stage, but also with a greater proportion of bottom-up approaches, particularly as the pandemic trudges on. More interestingly, the multi-faceted repercussions of COVID-19 have gradually opened the door to a greater variety of collaborative partnerships in sectors
beyond
healthcare services. The participating stakeholders include, but are not limited to, local and international business actors, non-profit organizations, academia and other countries. Lastly, as the pandemic has continued, the Singapore government has managed
outward
to tap the expertise and knowledge of the private sector, in particular leveraging science and technology to improve control measures and putting supportive programs into practice.
Conclusion
The evidence from our focused analyses demonstrates that the nature and scale of the COVID-19 pandemic produced more collaborative partnerships between the public and private sectors in Singapore as compared with the SARS outbreak. What is more, our findings offer evidence that through adaptive learning from the prior global healthcare outbreak, plus some trial and error during the initial phase of the ongoing pandemic, public- and private-sector partners, both in and outside of the healthcare service sector, have tended to “act alike,” working together to achieve a common goal. Both have been socially responsible, providing public services to people in need to promote the rapid resilience of the community, and sharing the associated risks. Overall, this study has deep and wide implications for other governments and policy makers who are still struggling to maximize essential resources and minimize the negative impacts of the healthcare crisis. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Background The spread of COVID-19 has taken a toll on many countries and its healthcare system over the last two years. Governments have sought to mitigate the repercussions of the pandemic by implementing aggressive top-down control measures and introducing immense fiscal spending. Singapore is no exception to this trend. Owing to a whole-of-society approach, Singapore is still being lauded globally for its relatively successful record at controlling both community and trans-border spread. One notable effort by the Singapore government has taken place through its cross-sectoral collaborative partnerships with the private stakeholders behind the success. Methods/results In an attempt to better explain Singapore’s robust yet strategic response to COVID-19, this study focuses on how the experience of the SARS outbreak has informed the government’s collaborative efforts with other stakeholders in society, beyond mere transnational cooperation. Taking a comparative case study approach in the specific context of Singapore, we perform a content analysis of related government documents, mainstream newspaper articles, and academic journal articles in an inductive manner. By closely comparing two global healthcare outbreaks, we note four differences in approach. First, during the COVID-19 pandemic, Singapore has focused on securing sufficient essential healthcare resources with contingency plans to strengthen preparedness. Second, the government has actively harnessed the capacity of private entities to promote the resilience of the healthcare system and the community. Third, Singapore’s management policies have been made not only in a top-down, centralized style during the initial response stage, but also with a greater proportion of bottom-up approaches, particularly as the pandemic trudges on. More interestingly, the multi-faceted repercussions of COVID-19 have gradually opened the door to a greater variety of collaborative partnerships in sectors beyond healthcare services. The participating stakeholders include, but are not limited to, local and international business actors, non-profit organizations, academia and other countries. Lastly, as the pandemic has continued, the Singapore government has managed outward to tap the expertise and knowledge of the private sector, in particular leveraging science and technology to improve control measures and putting supportive programs into practice. Conclusion The evidence from our focused analyses demonstrates that the nature and scale of the COVID-19 pandemic produced more collaborative partnerships between the public and private sectors in Singapore as compared with the SARS outbreak. What is more, our findings offer evidence that through adaptive learning from the prior global healthcare outbreak, plus some trial and error during the initial phase of the ongoing pandemic, public- and private-sector partners, both in and outside of the healthcare service sector, have tended to “act alike,” working together to achieve a common goal. Both have been socially responsible, providing public services to people in need to promote the rapid resilience of the community, and sharing the associated risks. Overall, this study has deep and wide implications for other governments and policy makers who are still struggling to maximize essential resources and minimize the negative impacts of the healthcare crisis. Background The spread of COVID-19 has taken a toll on many countries and its healthcare system over the last two years. Governments have sought to mitigate the repercussions of the pandemic by implementing aggressive top-down control measures and introducing immense fiscal spending. Singapore is no exception to this trend. Owing to a whole-of-society approach, Singapore is still being lauded globally for its relatively successful record at controlling both community and trans-border spread. One notable effort by the Singapore government has taken place through its cross-sectoral collaborative partnerships with the private stakeholders behind the success. Methods/results In an attempt to better explain Singapore’s robust yet strategic response to COVID-19, this study focuses on how the experience of the SARS outbreak has informed the government’s collaborative efforts with other stakeholders in society, beyond mere transnational cooperation. Taking a comparative case study approach in the specific context of Singapore, we perform a content analysis of related government documents, mainstream newspaper articles, and academic journal articles in an inductive manner. By closely comparing two global healthcare outbreaks, we note four differences in approach. First, during the COVID-19 pandemic, Singapore has focused on securing sufficient essential healthcare resources with contingency plans to strengthen preparedness. Second, the government has actively harnessed the capacity of private entities to promote the resilience of the healthcare system and the community. Third, Singapore’s management policies have been made not only in a top-down, centralized style during the initial response stage, but also with a greater proportion of bottom-up approaches, particularly as the pandemic trudges on. More interestingly, the multi-faceted repercussions of COVID-19 have gradually opened the door to a greater variety of collaborative partnerships in sectors beyond healthcare services. The participating stakeholders include, but are not limited to, local and international business actors, non-profit organizations, academia and other countries. Lastly, as the pandemic has continued, the Singapore government has managed outward to tap the expertise and knowledge of the private sector, in particular leveraging science and technology to improve control measures and putting supportive programs into practice. Conclusion The evidence from our focused analyses demonstrates that the nature and scale of the COVID-19 pandemic produced more collaborative partnerships between the public and private sectors in Singapore as compared with the SARS outbreak. What is more, our findings offer evidence that through adaptive learning from the prior global healthcare outbreak, plus some trial and error during the initial phase of the ongoing pandemic, public- and private-sector partners, both in and outside of the healthcare service sector, have tended to “act alike,” working together to achieve a common goal. Both have been socially responsible, providing public services to people in need to promote the rapid resilience of the community, and sharing the associated risks. Overall, this study has deep and wide implications for other governments and policy makers who are still struggling to maximize essential resources and minimize the negative impacts of the healthcare crisis. The spread of COVID-19 has taken a toll on many countries and its healthcare system over the last two years. Governments have sought to mitigate the repercussions of the pandemic by implementing aggressive top-down control measures and introducing immense fiscal spending. Singapore is no exception to this trend. Owing to a whole-of-society approach, Singapore is still being lauded globally for its relatively successful record at controlling both community and trans-border spread. One notable effort by the Singapore government has taken place through its cross-sectoral collaborative partnerships with the private stakeholders behind the success.BACKGROUNDThe spread of COVID-19 has taken a toll on many countries and its healthcare system over the last two years. Governments have sought to mitigate the repercussions of the pandemic by implementing aggressive top-down control measures and introducing immense fiscal spending. Singapore is no exception to this trend. Owing to a whole-of-society approach, Singapore is still being lauded globally for its relatively successful record at controlling both community and trans-border spread. One notable effort by the Singapore government has taken place through its cross-sectoral collaborative partnerships with the private stakeholders behind the success.In an attempt to better explain Singapore's robust yet strategic response to COVID-19, this study focuses on how the experience of the SARS outbreak has informed the government's collaborative efforts with other stakeholders in society, beyond mere transnational cooperation. Taking a comparative case study approach in the specific context of Singapore, we perform a content analysis of related government documents, mainstream newspaper articles, and academic journal articles in an inductive manner. By closely comparing two global healthcare outbreaks, we note four differences in approach. First, during the COVID-19 pandemic, Singapore has focused on securing sufficient essential healthcare resources with contingency plans to strengthen preparedness. Second, the government has actively harnessed the capacity of private entities to promote the resilience of the healthcare system and the community. Third, Singapore's management policies have been made not only in a top-down, centralized style during the initial response stage, but also with a greater proportion of bottom-up approaches, particularly as the pandemic trudges on. More interestingly, the multi-faceted repercussions of COVID-19 have gradually opened the door to a greater variety of collaborative partnerships in sectors beyond healthcare services. The participating stakeholders include, but are not limited to, local and international business actors, non-profit organizations, academia and other countries. Lastly, as the pandemic has continued, the Singapore government has managed outward to tap the expertise and knowledge of the private sector, in particular leveraging science and technology to improve control measures and putting supportive programs into practice.METHODS/RESULTSIn an attempt to better explain Singapore's robust yet strategic response to COVID-19, this study focuses on how the experience of the SARS outbreak has informed the government's collaborative efforts with other stakeholders in society, beyond mere transnational cooperation. Taking a comparative case study approach in the specific context of Singapore, we perform a content analysis of related government documents, mainstream newspaper articles, and academic journal articles in an inductive manner. By closely comparing two global healthcare outbreaks, we note four differences in approach. First, during the COVID-19 pandemic, Singapore has focused on securing sufficient essential healthcare resources with contingency plans to strengthen preparedness. Second, the government has actively harnessed the capacity of private entities to promote the resilience of the healthcare system and the community. Third, Singapore's management policies have been made not only in a top-down, centralized style during the initial response stage, but also with a greater proportion of bottom-up approaches, particularly as the pandemic trudges on. More interestingly, the multi-faceted repercussions of COVID-19 have gradually opened the door to a greater variety of collaborative partnerships in sectors beyond healthcare services. The participating stakeholders include, but are not limited to, local and international business actors, non-profit organizations, academia and other countries. Lastly, as the pandemic has continued, the Singapore government has managed outward to tap the expertise and knowledge of the private sector, in particular leveraging science and technology to improve control measures and putting supportive programs into practice.The evidence from our focused analyses demonstrates that the nature and scale of the COVID-19 pandemic produced more collaborative partnerships between the public and private sectors in Singapore as compared with the SARS outbreak. What is more, our findings offer evidence that through adaptive learning from the prior global healthcare outbreak, plus some trial and error during the initial phase of the ongoing pandemic, public- and private-sector partners, both in and outside of the healthcare service sector, have tended to "act alike," working together to achieve a common goal. Both have been socially responsible, providing public services to people in need to promote the rapid resilience of the community, and sharing the associated risks. Overall, this study has deep and wide implications for other governments and policy makers who are still struggling to maximize essential resources and minimize the negative impacts of the healthcare crisis.CONCLUSIONThe evidence from our focused analyses demonstrates that the nature and scale of the COVID-19 pandemic produced more collaborative partnerships between the public and private sectors in Singapore as compared with the SARS outbreak. What is more, our findings offer evidence that through adaptive learning from the prior global healthcare outbreak, plus some trial and error during the initial phase of the ongoing pandemic, public- and private-sector partners, both in and outside of the healthcare service sector, have tended to "act alike," working together to achieve a common goal. Both have been socially responsible, providing public services to people in need to promote the rapid resilience of the community, and sharing the associated risks. Overall, this study has deep and wide implications for other governments and policy makers who are still struggling to maximize essential resources and minimize the negative impacts of the healthcare crisis. Abstract Background The spread of COVID-19 has taken a toll on many countries and its healthcare system over the last two years. Governments have sought to mitigate the repercussions of the pandemic by implementing aggressive top-down control measures and introducing immense fiscal spending. Singapore is no exception to this trend. Owing to a whole-of-society approach, Singapore is still being lauded globally for its relatively successful record at controlling both community and trans-border spread. One notable effort by the Singapore government has taken place through its cross-sectoral collaborative partnerships with the private stakeholders behind the success. Methods/results In an attempt to better explain Singapore’s robust yet strategic response to COVID-19, this study focuses on how the experience of the SARS outbreak has informed the government’s collaborative efforts with other stakeholders in society, beyond mere transnational cooperation. Taking a comparative case study approach in the specific context of Singapore, we perform a content analysis of related government documents, mainstream newspaper articles, and academic journal articles in an inductive manner. By closely comparing two global healthcare outbreaks, we note four differences in approach. First, during the COVID-19 pandemic, Singapore has focused on securing sufficient essential healthcare resources with contingency plans to strengthen preparedness. Second, the government has actively harnessed the capacity of private entities to promote the resilience of the healthcare system and the community. Third, Singapore’s management policies have been made not only in a top-down, centralized style during the initial response stage, but also with a greater proportion of bottom-up approaches, particularly as the pandemic trudges on. More interestingly, the multi-faceted repercussions of COVID-19 have gradually opened the door to a greater variety of collaborative partnerships in sectors beyond healthcare services. The participating stakeholders include, but are not limited to, local and international business actors, non-profit organizations, academia and other countries. Lastly, as the pandemic has continued, the Singapore government has managed outward to tap the expertise and knowledge of the private sector, in particular leveraging science and technology to improve control measures and putting supportive programs into practice. Conclusion The evidence from our focused analyses demonstrates that the nature and scale of the COVID-19 pandemic produced more collaborative partnerships between the public and private sectors in Singapore as compared with the SARS outbreak. What is more, our findings offer evidence that through adaptive learning from the prior global healthcare outbreak, plus some trial and error during the initial phase of the ongoing pandemic, public- and private-sector partners, both in and outside of the healthcare service sector, have tended to “act alike,” working together to achieve a common goal. Both have been socially responsible, providing public services to people in need to promote the rapid resilience of the community, and sharing the associated risks. Overall, this study has deep and wide implications for other governments and policy makers who are still struggling to maximize essential resources and minimize the negative impacts of the healthcare crisis. |
| ArticleNumber | 82 |
| Author | Kang, Jun Hong Brandon Goh, Yuki Kim, Soojin |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Soojin orcidid: 0000-0003-3141-8621 surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Soojin email: sjkim@ntu.edu.sg organization: Public Policy and Global Affairs Programme, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University – sequence: 2 givenname: Yuki surname: Goh fullname: Goh, Yuki organization: Public Policy and Global Affairs Programme, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University – sequence: 3 givenname: Jun Hong Brandon surname: Kang fullname: Kang, Jun Hong Brandon organization: Public Policy and Global Affairs Programme, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University |
| BookMark | eNp9UsFu1DAQjVCRaAs_wMkSFy4BO_Y6NgekaoGyUlElFrhatjMOXiX2YmeX8vf1biqgPfRgjT1-783TzJxVJyEGqKqXBL8hRPC3mTRSNjVuysGipfXNk-qUtIzVgmN68t_9WXWW8wZjhhmVp1X4Evc-9GiKv3XqkEY2jmMMqI96QHtf3inmXGewU0zlcxi0iUlPPoZ3aICcY8gl6hSgQy7FEa0vvq6LHFpe_1h9qIlEPqB1KaG3McHz6qnTQ4YXd_G8-v7p47fl5_rq-nK1vLiq7YK0U807C8ZpYywQya2mWrMFbbEhrbAaDGXEOltyTiwaaYzhooWOdQ4DdZQ29Lxazbpd1Bu1TX7U6Y-K2qtjIqZe6TR5O4ASzgJgoYlxjIEVRnam6SjjnMuDetF6P2ttd2aE4ixMSQ_3RO__BP9T9XGvJJO4JW0ReH0nkOKvHeRJjT5bKK0MEHdZNS3hki6EPEBfPYBu4i6F0qqCajgu3cG8oJoZdRxOAvfXDMHqsA9q3gdV9kEd90HdFJJ4QLJ-Og6ymPbD41Q6U3OpE3pI_1w9wroFIW3PLg |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1177_09579265241313061 crossref_primary_10_1080_16549716_2024_2428067 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_024_19655_8 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0309230 crossref_primary_10_21733_ibad_1268061 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000041279 crossref_primary_10_4103_singaporemedj_SMJ_2023_019 crossref_primary_10_1093_ijpor_edae040 crossref_primary_10_1080_23276665_2024_2383295 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjgh_2023_012965 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rspp_2025_100183 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_puhe_2023_06_042 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1046/j.1440-1843.2003.00518.x 10.2196/23148 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V35N5p301 10.1016/j.mulfin.2005.04.010 10.1080/01436590050004373 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V35N6p390 10.1016/j.rpsm.2021.06.001 10.1038/s41577-021-00522-1 10.1016/j.puhe.2005.10.005 10.1177/0275074020942061 10.5694/mja2.50623 10.1002/jsc.2402 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.08.001 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa105 10.1016/j.jsis.2009.05.001 10.1007/s41748-020-00184-4 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2020239 10.3389/fpubh.2021.679540 10.5465/amp.2019.0023 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V35N5p345 10.1080/13669877.2020.1756386 10.1177/0275074020942454 10.1093/jtm/taaa159 10.11622/smedj.2020162 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01995-4 10.1215/18752160-8698301 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.015 10.1177/1049732305276687 10.1111/puar.12432 10.1007/978-4-431-55022-8_15 10.1007/978-981-15-9453-3_3 10.1080/09540962.2021.1966197 10.3390/su12125097 10.1177/135676670301000107 10.1126/science.abb4942 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | The Author(s) 2022 2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 2022. The Author(s). |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2022 – notice: 2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: 2022. The Author(s). |
| DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7X7 7XB 88E 8C1 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ATCPS AZQEC BENPR BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ K9. M0S M1P PATMY PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PYCSY 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12992-022-00873-x |
| DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Public Health Database Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability (subscription) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database Environmental Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Environmental Science Collection MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Public Health ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Environmental Science Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Public Health |
| EISSN | 1744-8603 |
| EndPage | 18 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_8fcee08a1bf44ec8b9db2d3466698529 PMC9490717 10_1186_s12992_022_00873_x |
| GeographicLocations | China Singapore |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Singapore – name: China |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: The Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea grantid: Grant No. NRF-2018S1A3A2075609 – fundername: Ministry of Education, Singapore grantid: Tier 1 Grant; RG 117/20 – fundername: ; grantid: Grant No. NRF-2018S1A3A2075609 – fundername: ; grantid: Tier 1 Grant; RG 117/20 |
| GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 29I 2WC 2XV 44B 53G 5GY 5VS 7X7 7XC 88E 8C1 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL ABDBF ABHFT ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS ATCPS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BHPHI BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBD EBLON EBS ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR ITC KPI KQ8 LMP M1P M48 MK0 M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PATMY PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PUEGO PYCSY RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ TR2 TUS UKHRP WOQ WOW XSB ~8M AAYXX ALIPV CITATION 3V. 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO GNUQQ K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-6dcebfabbce196ca3aa45370b178caeb341cfca45f8529bbb687ed4df0e3f3323 |
| IEDL.DBID | M48 |
| ISSN | 1744-8603 |
| IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:29:12 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:39:55 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 04 23:47:45 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 28 08:29:55 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:58:25 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:54:13 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:27:25 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | COVID-19 Partnerships Cross-Sector Collaboration Health Crisis Singapore |
| Language | English |
| License | Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c517t-6dcebfabbce196ca3aa45370b178caeb341cfca45f8529bbb687ed4df0e3f3323 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-3141-8621 |
| OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12992-022-00873-x |
| PQID | 2726051706 |
| PQPubID | 54663 |
| PageCount | 18 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_8fcee08a1bf44ec8b9db2d3466698529 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9490717 proquest_miscellaneous_2716935897 proquest_journals_2726051706 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12992_022_00873_x crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12992_022_00873_x springer_journals_10_1186_s12992_022_00873_x |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2022-09-21 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-09-21 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2022 text: 2022-09-21 day: 21 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | London |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London |
| PublicationTitle | Globalization and health |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | Global Health |
| PublicationYear | 2022 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
| References | 873_CR53 873_CR15 K Goh (873_CR24) 2006; 35 873_CR59 C Wong (873_CR82) 2020; 23 D Baxter (873_CR12) 2020; 12 873_CR91 J Bryson (873_CR11) 2015; 75 Z Huang (873_CR33) 2020; 8 873_CR92 W Abdullah (873_CR1) 2020; 50 873_CR90 873_CR51 873_CR50 J Henderson (873_CR31) 2004; 10 J Chen (873_CR17) 2020; 49 873_CR67 873_CR20 S Shorey (873_CR71) 2020; 42 873_CR21 Ministry of Health (873_CR58) 2020 873_CR65 873_CR26 873_CR27 873_CR68 873_CR25 V Vecchi (873_CR80) 2020; 50 873_CR62 873_CR60 873_CR61 Ministry of Finance (873_CR55) 2003 MI Chen (873_CR18) 2006; 35 Duke-NUS (873_CR22) 2020 C Tan (873_CR73) 2006; 35 A Fouda (873_CR23) 2020; 9 873_CR19 H Hsieh (873_CR32) 2005; 15 Temasek (873_CR78) 2020 CB Tay (873_CR76) 2004 873_CR77 A*STAR (873_CR3) 2020 873_CR75 873_CR37 V Pereira (873_CR66) 2020; 34 873_CR38 873_CR36 H Stevens (873_CR72) 2020; 14 873_CR4 873_CR70 873_CR2 873_CR8 873_CR9 873_CR30 873_CR74 873_CR6 873_CR7 Temasek (873_CR79) 2021 H Yi (873_CR89) 2021; 28 J Li (873_CR45) 2021; 9 M Chan-Yeung (873_CR14) 2003; 8 M Rohrer (873_CR69) 2020; 4 873_CR29 H Mutalib (873_CR64) 2000; 21 Ministry of Defence (873_CR54) 2003 Worldometers.info. (873_CR87) 2022 J Ang (873_CR5) 2006; 16 AY Lai (873_CR39) 2012; 5 873_CR88 873_CR42 873_CR86 T Carvalho (873_CR16) 2021; 21 L James (873_CR35) 2006; 120 873_CR43 873_CR48 Immigration & Checkpoints Authority (873_CR34) 2022 873_CR46 R Lin (873_CR47) 2020; 212 J Bryson (873_CR10) 2006; 66 873_CR81 A Lai (873_CR40) 2015 Q Liu (873_CR49) 2020; 13 873_CR85 873_CR83 Government Technology Agency (GovTech) (873_CR28) 2021 Ministry of Health (873_CR57) 2004 M Monti (873_CR63) 2021; 398 D Leidner (873_CR44) 2009; 18 Ministry of Foreign Affairs (873_CR56) 2021 V Martins (873_CR52) 2021; 30 L Chan (873_CR13) 2020; 10 JJ Woo (873_CR84) 2021 C Lee (873_CR41) 2020 |
| References_xml | – volume: 8 start-page: 9 issue: 1 year: 2003 ident: 873_CR14 publication-title: Respirology doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1843.2003.00518.x – ident: 873_CR25 – ident: 873_CR50 – volume: 8 start-page: e23148 issue: 10 year: 2020 ident: 873_CR33 publication-title: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth doi: 10.2196/23148 – ident: 873_CR21 – volume: 35 start-page: 301 issue: 5 year: 2006 ident: 873_CR24 publication-title: Ann Acad Med Singapore doi: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V35N5p301 – volume: 16 start-page: 64 issue: 1 year: 2006 ident: 873_CR5 publication-title: J Multinatl Financ Manag doi: 10.1016/j.mulfin.2005.04.010 – ident: 873_CR77 – volume-title: Temasek Foundation partners People's Association, corporates, unions, universities, and community organisations to provide free hand sanitiser to Singapore households year: 2020 ident: 873_CR78 – ident: 873_CR15 – volume-title: Duke-NUS, GenScript and A*STAR launch first-in-the-world SARS-CoV-2 serology test to detect neutralising antibodies without need of containment facility or specimen year: 2020 ident: 873_CR22 – ident: 873_CR38 – ident: 873_CR19 – ident: 873_CR92 – volume: 5 start-page: 74 issue: 1 year: 2012 ident: 873_CR39 publication-title: Austrian J South East Asian Stud – volume: 21 start-page: 313 issue: 2 year: 2000 ident: 873_CR64 publication-title: Third World Quarterly doi: 10.1080/01436590050004373 – ident: 873_CR86 – volume: 35 start-page: 390 issue: 6 year: 2006 ident: 873_CR18 publication-title: Ann Acad Med Singap doi: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V35N6p390 – ident: 873_CR2 – ident: 873_CR29 – ident: 873_CR53 doi: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2021.06.001 – volume: 10 start-page: 1 issue: 2 year: 2020 ident: 873_CR13 publication-title: J Glob Health – volume-title: Minister for Foreign Affairs Dr Vivian Balakrishnan’s written replies to parliamentary questions, 26 July 2021 year: 2021 ident: 873_CR56 – volume: 21 start-page: 245 issue: 4 year: 2021 ident: 873_CR16 publication-title: Nat Rev Immunol doi: 10.1038/s41577-021-00522-1 – volume-title: Communicable diseases surveillance in Singapore 2003 year: 2004 ident: 873_CR57 – ident: 873_CR6 – ident: 873_CR67 – volume-title: Public-private partnerships – having the best of Both worlds year: 2021 ident: 873_CR28 – volume: 120 start-page: 20 issue: 1 year: 2006 ident: 873_CR35 publication-title: Public Health doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2005.10.005 – volume-title: A collaboration to boost nationwide mask production year: 2020 ident: 873_CR3 – ident: 873_CR20 – ident: 873_CR30 – ident: 873_CR51 – volume-title: Temasek review 2021: bounce forward year: 2021 ident: 873_CR79 – volume: 50 start-page: 642 issue: 6–7 year: 2020 ident: 873_CR80 publication-title: Am Rev Public Adm doi: 10.1177/0275074020942061 – volume: 212 start-page: 497 issue: 11 year: 2020 ident: 873_CR47 publication-title: Med J Aust doi: 10.5694/mja2.50623 – ident: 873_CR59 – volume-title: Stay Home Notice (SHN) & SHN Dedicated Facilities (SDF) year: 2022 ident: 873_CR34 – volume: 30 start-page: 179 issue: 2 year: 2021 ident: 873_CR52 publication-title: Strateg Chang doi: 10.1002/jsc.2402 – volume: 13 start-page: 1611 issue: 11 year: 2020 ident: 873_CR49 publication-title: J Infect Public Health doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.08.001 – volume: 42 start-page: 665 issue: 4 year: 2020 ident: 873_CR71 publication-title: J Public Health doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaa105 – volume: 18 start-page: 80 issue: 2 year: 2009 ident: 873_CR44 publication-title: J Strateg Inf Syst doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2009.05.001 – ident: 873_CR62 – volume: 4 start-page: 789 year: 2020 ident: 873_CR69 publication-title: Earth Syst Environ doi: 10.1007/s41748-020-00184-4 – ident: 873_CR83 – ident: 873_CR7 – volume: 49 start-page: 561 issue: 8 year: 2020 ident: 873_CR17 publication-title: Ann Acad Med Singap doi: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2020239 – volume: 9 start-page: 679540 year: 2021 ident: 873_CR45 publication-title: Front Public Health doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.679540 – volume: 34 start-page: 480 issue: 4 year: 2020 ident: 873_CR66 publication-title: Acad Manag Perspect doi: 10.5465/amp.2019.0023 – volume-title: An architecture for network centric operations in unconventional crisis: lessons learnt from Singapore's SARS experience year: 2004 ident: 873_CR76 – volume-title: Comprehensive medical strategy for COVID-19 year: 2020 ident: 873_CR58 – ident: 873_CR75 – volume: 35 start-page: 345 issue: 5 year: 2006 ident: 873_CR73 publication-title: Ann Acad Med Singap doi: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.V35N5p345 – volume: 23 start-page: 1021 issue: 7–8 year: 2020 ident: 873_CR82 publication-title: J Risk Res doi: 10.1080/13669877.2020.1756386 – ident: 873_CR90 – ident: 873_CR36 – ident: 873_CR61 – volume: 50 start-page: 770 issue: 6–7 year: 2020 ident: 873_CR1 publication-title: Am Rev Public Adm doi: 10.1177/0275074020942454 – volume: 28 start-page: 1 issue: 2 year: 2021 ident: 873_CR89 publication-title: J Travel Med doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa159 – ident: 873_CR88 – ident: 873_CR4 – ident: 873_CR27 – ident: 873_CR46 – ident: 873_CR8 – ident: 873_CR48 doi: 10.11622/smedj.2020162 – volume: 398 start-page: 1029 issue: 10305 year: 2021 ident: 873_CR63 publication-title: The Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01995-4 – volume: 14 start-page: 523 issue: 3 year: 2020 ident: 873_CR72 publication-title: East Asian Sci Technol Soc doi: 10.1215/18752160-8698301 – volume: 9 start-page: 510 issue: 4 year: 2020 ident: 873_CR23 publication-title: Health Policy Technol doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.015 – volume: 15 start-page: 1277 issue: 9 year: 2005 ident: 873_CR32 publication-title: Qual Health Res doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687 – volume: 75 start-page: 647 issue: 5 year: 2015 ident: 873_CR11 publication-title: Public Adm Rev doi: 10.1111/puar.12432 – volume-title: MINDEF/SAF Personnel Recognised for Their Effort against SARS year: 2003 ident: 873_CR54 – ident: 873_CR91 – start-page: 309 volume-title: Resilience and recovery in Asian disasters year: 2015 ident: 873_CR40 doi: 10.1007/978-4-431-55022-8_15 – start-page: 49 volume-title: Capacity-building and Pandemics year: 2021 ident: 873_CR84 doi: 10.1007/978-981-15-9453-3_3 – ident: 873_CR42 doi: 10.1080/09540962.2021.1966197 – ident: 873_CR70 – volume: 12 start-page: 5097 issue: 12 year: 2020 ident: 873_CR12 publication-title: Sustainability doi: 10.3390/su12125097 – ident: 873_CR37 – ident: 873_CR74 – volume: 10 start-page: 67 issue: 1 year: 2004 ident: 873_CR31 publication-title: J Vacat Mark doi: 10.1177/135676670301000107 – volume-title: Good Public Governance in a Global Pandemic year: 2020 ident: 873_CR41 – ident: 873_CR60 – ident: 873_CR85 – volume-title: COVID Live - Coronavirus statistics - worldometer year: 2022 ident: 873_CR87 – ident: 873_CR65 doi: 10.1126/science.abb4942 – volume: 66 start-page: 44 issue: s1 year: 2006 ident: 873_CR10 publication-title: Public Adm Rev doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x – volume-title: Government Unveils $230 Million SARS Relief Package year: 2003 ident: 873_CR55 – ident: 873_CR43 – ident: 873_CR26 – ident: 873_CR68 – ident: 873_CR9 – ident: 873_CR81 |
| SSID | ssj0040439 |
| Score | 2.3776288 |
| Snippet | Background
The spread of COVID-19 has taken a toll on many countries and its healthcare system over the last two years. Governments have sought to mitigate the... Background The spread of COVID-19 has taken a toll on many countries and its healthcare system over the last two years. Governments have sought to mitigate the... The spread of COVID-19 has taken a toll on many countries and its healthcare system over the last two years. Governments have sought to mitigate the... Abstract Background The spread of COVID-19 has taken a toll on many countries and its healthcare system over the last two years. Governments have sought to... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest crossref springer |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database Publisher |
| StartPage | 1 |
| SubjectTerms | Adaptive learning Collaboration Comparative studies Content analysis Contingency Contingency plans Coronaviruses COVID-19 Cross-Sector Collaboration Development Economics Epidemiology Fatalities Global health Health care Health Crisis Health in foreign policy Health services Health Services Research Medicine Medicine & Public Health Nonprofit organizations Outbreaks Pandemics Partnerships Private sector Public Health Quality of Life Research Resilience Ridesharing Severe acute respiratory syndrome Singapore Social Policy Viral diseases |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQT0gIUR4iUJCRuIHVxHb84FYKVUEqSCxFvVm2Y8NKVRax26o_nxknWUgl4MJxEydre77xzDiebwh5LpQ1WXnN6iBqJjveMh-yZ1bFjodY8ywwOfnkgzo-le_P2rPfSn3hmbCBHniYuH2TYRmvjW9CljJFE2wXeCckuN3WtLyk7oEZm4KpYQ1Gyhg7pcgYtb8Gq4anLCHwQg42wa5mZqiw9c9czOsHJK99JS3G5-gOuT16jfRg6O0uuZH6u-TWsOVGh0yie6Q_KbsDdFNOwlJPAUwAMvp1BY9eLuE3doWtyz49nQHgFT2HFQ8ASEsVidRRTDuhi4NPC3gdPfz45d0b1li67OkCa2iD057uk9Ojt58Pj9lYToHFttEbpmA4IIYQYgK1i154L1uh69BoEz0E1bKJOcK1jPMaQlBGp052uU4iC8HFA7LTr_r0kNCgTe2N8BosPqa6ImlZanMXVdB1SrEizTS7Lo5c41jy4tyVmMMoN0jEgURckYi7qsiL7TPfB6aNv7Z-jULbtkSW7HIBsONG7Lh_Yacie5PI3ai6a8c1hnjIKlSRZ9vboHT4JcX3aXWBbZDDpjVWV0TPoDLr0PxOv_xW6LuttBhEV-TlBKpff_7nAT_6HwN-TG7yogSW8WaP7Gx-XKQn4FRtwtOiPz8BZ6ogsg priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3daxQxEA_1-iKI-ImrVSL4pqG7m91NIoi0taUKPaVnpW8hn_Wg7NbeVfrnO5PbvbIF-7jZZDeTmUlmksxvCHnHGyVjYwTLLc9Z5cuaGRsNU43zpXV5GTkGJx9Nm8OT6ttpfbpBpkMsDF6rHObENFH7zuEe-XYp0PJGsJfPF38YZo3C09UhhYbpUyv4Twli7B7ZLDGr8oRs7u5PfxwPczNCyaghdEY22wtY7fD2JThkiM3G2fVoeUoo_iPT8_bFyVunp2lROnhEHvbWJN1Zsf8x2QjtE_JgtRVHVxFGT0l7lHYN6DLdkKWGAsFADT3roOnfOTxjV9gi7d_TkWB8pOcwE4Jg0pRdIniK4Sh0tnM8g8_Rve-_vn5hhaLzls4wtzYY8-EZOTnY_7l3yPo0C8zBeC5ZA-QAe6x1AdTRGW5MVXOR20JIZ8DZrgoXHZRFWZfKWttIEXzlYx545Lzkz8mk7drwglArZG4kNwIsAQyBRTCzUEfvGivyEFxGimF0tesxyDEVxrlOvohs9IojGjiiE0f0dUber9tcrBA47qy9i0xb10T07FTQXZ7pXhm1jGAa5NIUNlZVcNIqb0vPK3DlFNKYka2B5bpX6YW-EcCMvF2_BmXEExbThu4K6yC2TS2VyIgYicqoQ-M37fx3gvVWlULnOiMfBqG6-fn_CX55d19fkftlEm_FymKLTJaXV-E1mFFL-6bXjX9B4h4a priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals dbid: C6C link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3daxQxEA_SgggitSquthLBNw3ubrL58K09LVU4Bc9K30KSTepB2RPvKv75zmR3T7eo4ONmJ9lkZyYzk2R-IeQZl0Yn6RQrPS-ZaOuGOZ8cMzK0tQ9lnTgmJ8_fy9Mz8e68OR9gcjAX5vf9-0rLl2uwR3g-EkImRE_jDPzF3QYmXjy-N5OzcdZFkBgzJsX8sd7E8GR8_olTef1I5LV90WxuTvbIncFPpEc9Y--SG7HbJzfnw074Prndr7fRPo3oHunmeWmAbvIxWOooSBJIGL1YQSvfl_CMvWLrvEhPJ9x_RS9hugPpo_kKidhSzDmhi6OPC2iOzj58fvuaVYYuO7rAC7TBY4_3ydnJm0-zUzbcpcBCU6kNkzAy4IH3IYLOBcedEw1Xpa-UDg4ialGFFKAs6aY23nupVWxFm8rIE-c1f0B2ulUXHxLqlS6d5k6Bucc8V0Qsi01qg_SqjDEUpBp_tA0D0Djed3Fpc8Chpe2ZY4E5NjPH_ijI822drz3Mxj-pj5F_W0qEyM4FIDl20DirE9j_UrvKJyFi0N60vm65gHjN4BgLcjBy3w56u7a1wvgOIYUK8nT7GjQOt1FcF1dXSIMANo02qiBqIjWTDk3fdMsvGbvbCIMRdEFejPL16-N_H_Cj_yN_TG7VWfINq6sDsrP5dhUPwXfa-CdZaX4Cb68UMA priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
| Title | Moving toward a common goal via cross-sector collaboration: lessons learned from SARS to COVID-19 in Singapore |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12992-022-00873-x https://www.proquest.com/docview/2726051706 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2716935897 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9490717 https://doaj.org/article/8fcee08a1bf44ec8b9db2d3466698529 |
| Volume | 18 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3db9MwELfG9oKE0PgSgVEZiTcwJLHjDySE1rBpIHWglqKKl8h2nK1SlbK2Q-O_5-wkRZkG4iVSEiexfb-L72zf7xB6QbmSFdeCxIbGhJVpRrSpNFHclqmxcVpRH5w8OuUnU_Zpls12UJfuqO3A9Y2unc8nNV0tXl9d_HoPCv8uKLzkb9YwZvk9lOBWeYY1SsCm3IORKfUoH7HtqoInklFNgCQjkse0C6K58R29gSrw-feM0OtbKK-to4bh6Xgf3W3tSnzYAOEe2nH1fXSnmZTDTazRA1SPwvwB3oS9slhjgBvAEJ8t4dGfczj3VSHrMJOPexB5ixfwTwSI4pBnwpXYB6bgyeF4Aq_D-edvHz-QROF5jSc-yzb0qHuIpsdHX_MT0iZcIDZLxIZwaA4IyhjrQDGtplqzjIrYJEJaDW43S2xl4Vols1QZY7gUrmRlFTtaUZrSR2i3XtbuMcJGyFhLqgXYBD4Y1tOauawqLTcids5GKOl6t7AtG7lPirEoglciedFIpACJFEEixVWEXm6f-dFwcfyz9NALbVvS82iHC8vVWdGqZSErMBJiqRNTMeasNKo0aUkZOHXKtzFCB53Iiw6bRSq8E-h5hyL0fHsb1NKvtejaLS99Gc9yk0klIiR6UOlVqH-nnp8Hgm_FlHezI_SqA9Wfj_-9wU_-ozJP0e00YFyRNDlAu5vVpXsGVtXGDNAtMRNwlHkyQHvDo9MvYzjLeT4I8xSDoEpwHA-__wb-TCUt |
| linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELaqcgAJIZ4itICR4ARWEzsPGwmhsqXapd0isS3qzdiOU1aqkra7hfKn-I3MOJutUoneekxiJ47n4Rl75htCXotcySo3BYutiFla8owZWxmmcldy62JeCUxOHu_lw4P0y2F2uEL-drkwGFbZ6cSgqMvG4R75Bi_Q8kawl48npwyrRuHpaldCo2WLHf_nN7hssw-jLaDvG863P-8PhmxRVYA56D5neek8jMZa54H7nBHGpJkoYpsU0hnwLdPEVQ7uVTLjylqby8KXaVnFXlRCINABqPxbmGmEciUHy5ASBKpRXWKOzDdmsJZibCe4e4j8JthFb_ELNQJ6hu3VsMwrZ7Nhydu-T-4tbFW62TLXA7Li64fkbrvRR9v8pUekHoc9CToP8bfUUJhOmCt61EDXX1O4xqGwWTgdoD22e0-PQc8C29NQu8KXFJNd6GTz2wReRwdfv4-2WKLotKYTrNwNroJ_TA5uZLqfkNW6qf1TQm0hYyOFKcDOwARbhErzWVW63Bax9y4iSTe72i0QzrHQxrEOno7MdUsRDRTRgSL6IiJvl31OWnyPa1t_QqItWyI2d7jRnB3phahrWYHhEUuT2CpNvZNWlZaXIgVHUeE_RmS9I7leKIyZvmTviLxaPgZRx_MbU_vmHNsgck4mVRGRoscqvQH1n9TTnwE0XKUKXfeIvOuY6vLj___hZ9eP9SW5Pdwf7-rd0d7OGrnDA6srxpN1sjo_O_fPwWCb2xdBSij5cdNi-Q_SzFc0 |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3ha9UwEA-ywRBEdCpWp0bwm4a1TdskfptvPjb1TfE52beQpMn2YPSNvW7453uXtk87VPBj0yRNenfJXe7uF0Je8UrJUBnBUstTVtR5yYwNhqnK1bl1aR44JifPjqqD4-LDSXnyWxZ_jHYfXJJdTgOiNDXt7kUdOhGX1e4KdimMmgRDCjHVOAMtchOxuhA9f1JNhrUYoWPUkCrzx3aj7Sii9o9UzZuBkje8pXETmt4jd3vtke515L5Pbvlmm2zNev_4NrnTncLRLrnoAWlm8cCAtjE4lhoKUwW-o6dL6OV6Ac84KraKR_d0xBNv6TksgsCTNF4s4WuKmSh0vvd1Dt3Ryefvh_ssU3TR0Dleqw16vH9Ijqfvv00OWH_DAnNlJlpWwcyAMtY6D5LoDDemKLlIbSakM2BnF5kLDsqCLHNlra2k8HVRh9TzwHnOH5GNZtn4x4RaIVMjuRGgBGD2K-KY-TLUrrIi9d4lJBt-tHY9_DjegnGuoxkiK90RRwNxdCSO_pGQ1-s2Fx34xj9rv0P6rWsicHYsWF6e6l4OtQygFaTSZDYUhXfSqtrmNS_AilM4x4TsDNTXvTSvdC7Q6kOgoYS8XL8GOUTnimn88grrIKxNKZVIiBhxzWhA4zfN4iwieqtCoV2dkDcDf_36-N8n_OT_qr8gW1_2p_rT4dHHp-R2HoVAsTzbIRvt5ZV_BspVa59H-fkJCakfbw |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Moving+toward+a+common+goal+via+cross-sector+collaboration%3A+lessons+learned+from+SARS+to+COVID-19+in+Singapore&rft.jtitle=Globalization+and+health&rft.au=Kim%2C+Soojin&rft.au=Goh%2C+Yuki&rft.au=Kang%2C+Jun+Hong+Brandon&rft.date=2022-09-21&rft.issn=1744-8603&rft.eissn=1744-8603&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=82&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12992-022-00873-x&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1744-8603&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1744-8603&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1744-8603&client=summon |