The validity of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes for identifying patients hospitalized for COPD exacerbations

• Published in: Chest Vol. 141; no. 1; p. 87
• Main Authors: Stein, Brian D, Bautista, Adriana, Schumock, Glen T, Lee, Todd A, Charbeneau, Jeffery T, Lauderdale, Diane S, Naureckas, Edward T, Meltzer, David O, Krishnan, Jerry A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01.01.2012
• Subjects: Academic Medical Centers - statistics & numerical data; Aged; Algorithms; Clinical Coding - methods; Female; Hospitalization - statistics & numerical data; Humans; International Classification of Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Prevalence; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - classification; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - diagnosis; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive - epidemiology; Recurrence; Reproducibility of Results; Retrospective Studies; United States - epidemiology; United States
• ISSN: 1931-3543; 0012-3692; 1931-3543
• DOI: 10.1378/chest.11-0024

Acute exacerbations of COPD (AE-COPD) are a leading cause of hospitalizations in the United States. To estimate the burden of disease (eg, prevalence and cost), identify opportunities to improve care quality (eg, performance measures), and conduct observational comparative effectiveness research studies, various algorithms based on the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes have been used to identify patients with COPD. However, the validity of these algorithms remains unclear. We compared the test characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value) of four different coding algorithms for identifying patients hospitalized for an exacerbation of COPD with chart review (reference standard) using a stratified probability sample of 200 hospitalizations at two urban academic medical centers. Sampling weights were used when calculating prevalence and test characteristics. The prevalence of COPD exacerbations (based on the reference standard) was 7.9% of all hospitalizations. The sensitivity of all ICD-9-CM algorithms was very low and varied by algorithm (12%-25%), but the negative predictive value was similarly high across algorithms (93%-94%). The specificity was > 99% for all algorithms, but the positive predictive value varied by algorithm (81%-97%). Algorithms based on ICD-9-CM codes will undercount hospitalizations for AE-COPD, and as many as one in five patients identified by these algorithms may be misidentified as having a COPD exacerbation. These findings suggest that relying on ICD-9-CM codes alone to identify patients hospitalized for AE-COPD may be problematic.