biological and clinical value of p53 expression in pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas
Studies on the p53 expression and outcome for women with ovarian carcinoma have produced conflicting results. The observed heterogeneity may be due to the range of cut-offs used to define overexpression and the mix of histotypes of the study cohorts. We aimed to examine the association between p53 e...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of pathology Vol. 222; no. 2; pp. 191 - 198 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Chichester, UK
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
01.10.2010
Wiley |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0022-3417 1096-9896 1096-9896 |
DOI | 10.1002/path.2744 |
Cover
Abstract | Studies on the p53 expression and outcome for women with ovarian carcinoma have produced conflicting results. The observed heterogeneity may be due to the range of cut-offs used to define overexpression and the mix of histotypes of the study cohorts. We aimed to examine the association between p53 expression and biological properties of tumours as well as outcome in 502 pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) derived from two population-based cohorts from British Columbia representing cases with or without residual tumour after initial surgery, respectively, and one clinical trial cohort from Germany (AGO-OVAR-3). p53 expression was assessed on tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry using the DO-7 antibody. p53 expression was scored in three tiers as complete loss of expression, focal expression or overexpression (defined as more than 50% positive tumour cell nuclei) and correlated with survival using multivariate Cox regression models. p53 was completely absent in 30.3%, focally expressed in 12.0%, and overexpressed in 57.7% of HGSCs, which was an inverse pattern compared to clear cell and endometrioid types of ovarian carcinomas, where 76% and 69% of cases showed focal expression, respectively (p < 0.001, chi square test). Pelvic HGSCs show either complete absence of p53 expression or p53 overexpression in 88% of cases; thus, aberrant p53 expression is a ubiquitous feature of HGSCs. HGSCs with p53 overexpression were associated with a reduced risk of recurrence compared to cases with complete absence of p53 in the British Columbia cohort with residual tumour (HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.99) and for a combination of all three cohorts (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.89) in multivariate analysis including age, stage, residual tumour, and stratification by cohort. The association of complete absence of p53 expression with unfavourable outcome suggests functional differences of TP53 mutations underlying overexpression, compared to those underlying complete absence of expression. Copyright © 2010 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Studies on the p53 expression and outcome for women with ovarian carcinoma have produced conflicting results. The observed heterogeneity may be due to the range of cut-offs used to define overexpression and the mix of histotypes of the study cohorts. We aimed to examine the association between p53 expression and biological properties of tumours as well as outcome in 502 pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) derived from two population-based cohorts from British Columbia representing cases with or without residual tumour after initial surgery, respectively, and one clinical trial cohort from Germany (AGO-OVAR-3). p53 expression was assessed on tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry using the DO-7 antibody. p53 expression was scored in three tiers as complete loss of expression, focal expression or overexpression (defined as more than 50% positive tumour cell nuclei) and correlated with survival using multivariate Cox regression models. p53 was completely absent in 30.3%, focally expressed in 12.0%, and overexpressed in 57.7% of HGSCs, which was an inverse pattern compared to clear cell and endometrioid types of ovarian carcinomas, where 76% and 69% of cases showed focal expression, respectively (p < 0.001, chi square test). Pelvic HGSCs show either complete absence of p53 expression or p53 overexpression in 88% of cases; thus, aberrant p53 expression is a ubiquitous feature of HGSCs. HGSCs with p53 overexpression were associated with a reduced risk of recurrence compared to cases with complete absence of p53 in the British Columbia cohort with residual tumour (HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.99) and for a combination of all three cohorts (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.89) in multivariate analysis including age, stage, residual tumour, and stratification by cohort. The association of complete absence of p53 expression with unfavourable outcome suggests functional differences of TP53 mutations underlying overexpression, compared to those underlying complete absence of expression. Copyright © 2010 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Studies on the p53 expression and outcome for women with ovarian carcinoma have produced conflicting results. The observed heterogeneity may be due to the range of cut-offs used to define overexpression and the mix of histotypes of the study cohorts. We aimed to examine the association between p53 expression and biological properties of tumours as well as outcome in 502 pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) derived from two population-based cohorts from British Columbia representing cases with or without residual tumour after initial surgery, respectively, and one clinical trial cohort from Germany (AGO-OVAR-3). p53 expression was assessed on tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry using the DO-7 antibody. p53 expression was scored in three tiers as complete loss of expression, focal expression or overexpression (defined as more than 50% positive tumour cell nuclei) and correlated with survival using multivariate Cox regression models. p53 was completely absent in 30.3%, focally expressed in 12.0%, and overexpressed in 57.7% of HGSCs, which was an inverse pattern compared to clear cell and endometrioid types of ovarian carcinomas, where 76% and 69% of cases showed focal expression, respectively (p < 0.001, chi square test). Pelvic HGSCs show either complete absence of p53 expression or p53 overexpression in 88% of cases; thus, aberrant p53 expression is a ubiquitous feature of HGSCs. HGSCs with p53 overexpression were associated with a reduced risk of recurrence compared to cases with complete absence of p53 in the British Columbia cohort with residual tumour (HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.99) and for a combination of all three cohorts (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.89) in multivariate analysis including age, stage, residual tumour, and stratification by cohort. The association of complete absence of p53 expression with unfavourable outcome suggests functional differences of TP53 mutations underlying overexpression, compared to those underlying complete absence of expression. Studies on the p53 expression and outcome for women with ovarian carcinoma have produced conflicting results. The observed heterogeneity may be due to the range of cut-offs used to define overexpression and the mix of histotypes of the study cohorts. We aimed to examine the association between p53 expression and biological properties of tumours as well as outcome in 502 pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) derived from two population-based cohorts from British Columbia representing cases with or without residual tumour after initial surgery, respectively, and one clinical trial cohort from Germany (AGO-OVAR-3). p53 expression was assessed on tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry using the DO-7 antibody. p53 expression was scored in three tiers as complete loss of expression, focal expression or overexpression (defined as more than 50% positive tumour cell nuclei) and correlated with survival using multivariate Cox regression models. p53 was completely absent in 30.3%, focally expressed in 12.0%, and overexpressed in 57.7% of HGSCs, which was an inverse pattern compared to clear cell and endometrioid types of ovarian carcinomas, where 76% and 69% of cases showed focal expression, respectively (p < 0.001, chi square test). Pelvic HGSCs show either complete absence of p53 expression or p53 overexpression in 88% of cases; thus, aberrant p53 expression is a ubiquitous feature of HGSCs. HGSCs with p53 overexpression were associated with a reduced risk of recurrence compared to cases with complete absence of p53 in the British Columbia cohort with residual tumour (HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.99) and for a combination of all three cohorts (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.89) in multivariate analysis including age, stage, residual tumour, and stratification by cohort. The association of complete absence of p53 expression with unfavourable outcome suggests functional differences of TP53 mutations underlying overexpression, compared to those underlying complete absence of expression.Studies on the p53 expression and outcome for women with ovarian carcinoma have produced conflicting results. The observed heterogeneity may be due to the range of cut-offs used to define overexpression and the mix of histotypes of the study cohorts. We aimed to examine the association between p53 expression and biological properties of tumours as well as outcome in 502 pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) derived from two population-based cohorts from British Columbia representing cases with or without residual tumour after initial surgery, respectively, and one clinical trial cohort from Germany (AGO-OVAR-3). p53 expression was assessed on tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry using the DO-7 antibody. p53 expression was scored in three tiers as complete loss of expression, focal expression or overexpression (defined as more than 50% positive tumour cell nuclei) and correlated with survival using multivariate Cox regression models. p53 was completely absent in 30.3%, focally expressed in 12.0%, and overexpressed in 57.7% of HGSCs, which was an inverse pattern compared to clear cell and endometrioid types of ovarian carcinomas, where 76% and 69% of cases showed focal expression, respectively (p < 0.001, chi square test). Pelvic HGSCs show either complete absence of p53 expression or p53 overexpression in 88% of cases; thus, aberrant p53 expression is a ubiquitous feature of HGSCs. HGSCs with p53 overexpression were associated with a reduced risk of recurrence compared to cases with complete absence of p53 in the British Columbia cohort with residual tumour (HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.99) and for a combination of all three cohorts (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.89) in multivariate analysis including age, stage, residual tumour, and stratification by cohort. The association of complete absence of p53 expression with unfavourable outcome suggests functional differences of TP53 mutations underlying overexpression, compared to those underlying complete absence of expression. Studies on the p53 expression and outcome for women with ovarian carcinoma have produced conflicting results. The observed heterogeneity may be due to the range of cut‐offs used to define overexpression and the mix of histotypes of the study cohorts. We aimed to examine the association between p53 expression and biological properties of tumours as well as outcome in 502 pelvic high‐grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) derived from two population‐based cohorts from British Columbia representing cases with or without residual tumour after initial surgery, respectively, and one clinical trial cohort from Germany (AGO‐OVAR‐3). p53 expression was assessed on tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry using the DO‐7 antibody. p53 expression was scored in three tiers as complete loss of expression, focal expression or overexpression (defined as more than 50% positive tumour cell nuclei) and correlated with survival using multivariate Cox regression models. p53 was completely absent in 30.3%, focally expressed in 12.0%, and overexpressed in 57.7% of HGSCs, which was an inverse pattern compared to clear cell and endometrioid types of ovarian carcinomas, where 76% and 69% of cases showed focal expression, respectively ( p < 0.001, chi square test). Pelvic HGSCs show either complete absence of p53 expression or p53 overexpression in 88% of cases; thus, aberrant p53 expression is a ubiquitous feature of HGSCs. HGSCs with p53 overexpression were associated with a reduced risk of recurrence compared to cases with complete absence of p53 in the British Columbia cohort with residual tumour (HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.51–0.99) and for a combination of all three cohorts (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.55–0.89) in multivariate analysis including age, stage, residual tumour, and stratification by cohort. The association of complete absence of p53 expression with unfavourable outcome suggests functional differences of TP53 mutations underlying overexpression, compared to those underlying complete absence of expression. Copyright © 2010 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Author | Kalloger, Steve E Reuss, Alexander Köbel, Martin Huntsman, David G Kommoss, Stefan Kommoss, Friedrich Gao, Dongxia Gilks, C Blake Bois, Andreas du |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Köbel, Martin – sequence: 2 fullname: Reuss, Alexander – sequence: 3 fullname: Bois, Andreas du – sequence: 4 fullname: Kommoss, Stefan – sequence: 5 fullname: Kommoss, Friedrich – sequence: 6 fullname: Gao, Dongxia – sequence: 7 fullname: Kalloger, Steve E – sequence: 8 fullname: Huntsman, David G – sequence: 9 fullname: Gilks, C. Blake |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23175406$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20629008$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkc1u1DAUhS1URKeFBS8A3iDEIu31T-J4WY2gg1QVUFu6tByPPWPwJKmdKe3b4zAplRCIlWX7O0f3nnOA9tqutQi9JHBEAOhxr4f1ERWcP0EzArIqZC2rPTTLf7RgnIh9dJDSNwCQsiyfoX0KFZUA9Qx9bXwXupU3OmDdLrEJvv11udVha3HncF8ybO_6aFPyXYt9i3sbbr3Ba79aF6uolxYnG7ttwkZH49tuo9Nz9NTpkOyL6TxEVx_eX84Xxdmn04_zk7PClITzomE1ETWryiVYCtIthWA6D1wKKWvjLOUNbVzTVJw55kQjdX5y2lrGGTBXsUP0dufbx-5ma9OgNj4ZG4JubZ5ISRCkEgLkf0lRcqCEgMjkq4ncNhu7VH30Gx3v1UNoGXgzATrlqFzUrfHpkWNkNBuHO95xJnYpReuU8YMecopD1D4oAmqsT431qbG-rHj3h-LB9G_s5P7DB3v_b1B9PrlcTIpip_BpsHe_FTp-V5VgolTX56dqcTGvvvCSqOvMv97xTndKr2Le8eqCAmFA6roGytlPXVvAzg |
CODEN | JPTLAS |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1093_annonc_mdt464 crossref_primary_10_1002_path_5849 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2013_11_015 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph19074260 crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0000000000000251 crossref_primary_10_1002_path_3023 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13148_021_01130_5 crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0000000000000930 crossref_primary_10_1002_advs_202301930 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2011_01_005 crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0b013e31823732a9 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semdp_2021_10_006 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11684_023_1016_8 crossref_primary_10_3389_fbioe_2022_819183 crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_495754 crossref_primary_10_1038_modpathol_2013_102 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejcsup_2019_11_001 crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0000000000001713 crossref_primary_10_2174_0115672018253815230922070558 crossref_primary_10_1097_PAT_0b013e32835f2264 crossref_primary_10_3390_antiox10020187 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_humpath_2022_06_023 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13133343 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1701_2163_16_35322_1 crossref_primary_10_1111_cas_16252 crossref_primary_10_1136_jclinpath_2018_205634 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2020_109391 crossref_primary_10_1111_his_12664 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0030042 crossref_primary_10_3389_fimmu_2021_658922 crossref_primary_10_1038_bjc_2017_139 crossref_primary_10_4132_jptm_2020_06_01 crossref_primary_10_1002_cjp2_53 crossref_primary_10_1038_nrclinonc_2010_216 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1470_2045_13_70253_5 crossref_primary_10_1097_PAT_0b013e32835bd561 crossref_primary_10_1111_his_12029 crossref_primary_10_3727_096504016X14685034103671 crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0b013e31820c9ff3 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41379_022_01062_2 crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_24530 crossref_primary_10_1038_modpathol_2014_76 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_path_2010_12_009 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00428_019_02728_0 crossref_primary_10_1111_his_12033 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eurox_2022_100172 crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0000000000000291 crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_6569 crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0b013e31826a5399 crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0b013e31823bb1a1 crossref_primary_10_1002_cjp2_311 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_humpath_2015_06_002 crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0b013e31827f576a crossref_primary_10_1007_s00428_014_1599_1 crossref_primary_10_1111_his_12286 crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0000000000000488 crossref_primary_10_1101_cshperspect_a026252 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00428_021_03132_3 crossref_primary_10_1038_modpathol_2010_215 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12920_023_01657_x crossref_primary_10_1002_cjp2_109 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2012_04_021 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40661_016_0035_4 crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0b013e318272ff19 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_41706_z crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0000000000000211 crossref_primary_10_1111_his_12971 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2012_06_022 crossref_primary_10_1177_10668969211065115 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_13_62146_7 crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0000000000000738 crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0b013e31820d20ba crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbcan_2024_189224 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygeno_2015_09_001 crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0b013e31826b4ea1 crossref_primary_10_1080_1828051X_2018_1551071 crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0b013e31822c8036 crossref_primary_10_1038_modpathol_2013_144 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prp_2023_155020 crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0000000000000428 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semdp_2019_01_003 crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0b013e31824d7445 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pathol_2023_04_008 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41379_019_0356_z crossref_primary_10_1093_pnasnexus_pgac128 crossref_primary_10_1111_his_12581 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41379_020_0614_0 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2559_2011_03907_x crossref_primary_10_1038_srep26191 crossref_primary_10_3389_fimmu_2023_1221605 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2012_10_013 crossref_primary_10_18231_j_achr_2021_018 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0072162 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_015_1952_z crossref_primary_10_5858_arpa_2016_0541_RA crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0000000000000536 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0218618 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pathol_2017_09_010 crossref_primary_10_1111_his_12989 crossref_primary_10_1038_modpathol_2013_55 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pathol_2023_02_007 crossref_primary_10_1002_cncy_22596 crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0000000000000553 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mpdhp_2011_01_005 crossref_primary_10_1038_bjc_2015_471 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41379_021_00920_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2013_05_018 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_path_2016_01_003 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_53636_x crossref_primary_10_1097_PAT_0b013e328348a6e7 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_805613 crossref_primary_10_1136_jclinpath_2011_200352 crossref_primary_10_5858_arpa_2021_0098_RA crossref_primary_10_1038_modpathol_2011_211 crossref_primary_10_1111_his_12878 crossref_primary_10_1111_his_12516 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_017_5194_0 crossref_primary_10_1038_modpathol_2015_77 crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0000000000000640 crossref_primary_10_1038_bjc_2014_567 crossref_primary_10_1080_07357907_2020_1852411 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2020_01103 crossref_primary_10_3892_ol_2016_5083 crossref_primary_10_1186_1476_511X_12_152 |
Cites_doi | 10.1097/PAI.0b013e31819adacf 10.1186/1741-7015-5-33 10.1002/path.1374 10.1200/JCO.2003.11.052 10.1002/path.1838 10.1056/NEJMoa073770 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31803199b0 10.1006/gyno.2000.6025 10.1002/1097-0142(20001101)89:9<2006::AID-CNCR18>3.0.CO;2-7 10.1016/j.humpath.2008.01.003 10.1093/jnci/djg036 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01039.x 10.1097/00004347-200404000-00007 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.08.034 10.1016/j.molonc.2009.01.004 10.3322/caac.20006 10.1002/path.2696 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0751 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.017 10.1002/1097-0142(20010901)92:5<1177::AID-CNCR1436>3.0.CO;2-5 10.1101/cshperspect.a001016 10.1111/IGC.0b013e318199009c 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.029 10.1002/path.2659 10.1097/01.pas.0000146025.91953.8d 10.1002/path.1913 10.1097/PGP.0b013e3181c042b6 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050232 10.1017/S146239940800077X 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605112 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2010 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2015 INIST-CNRS Copyright 2010 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2010 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS – notice: Copyright 2010 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
DBID | FBQ BSCLL AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7TO H94 |
DOI | 10.1002/path.2744 |
DatabaseName | AGRIS Istex CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: FBQ name: AGRIS url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN sourceTypes: Publisher |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1096-9896 |
EndPage | 198 |
ExternalDocumentID | 20629008 23175406 10_1002_path_2744 PATH2744 ark_67375_WNG_HSC6Q451_W US201301888024 |
Genre | article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Multicenter Study Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National Cancer Institute of Canada funderid: 017051 – fundername: Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Unit funderid: INRUA006045 – fundername: Cheryl Brown Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Unit of the British Columbia Cancer Agency |
GroupedDBID | --- -~X .3N .55 .GA .GJ .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 123 1KJ 1L6 1OB 1OC 1ZS 29L 31~ 33P 3O- 3SF 3UE 3WU 4.4 4ZD 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5RE 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAHQN AAIPD AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABIJN ABJNI ABLJU ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFS ACGOF ACIWK ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AEUYR AFBPY AFFNX AFFPM AFGKR AFRAH AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AHBTC AHMBA AI. AIACR AITYG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBS EJD EMOBN F00 F01 F04 F5P FBQ FEDTE FUBAC G-S G.N GNP GODZA GSXLS H.X HBH HF~ HGLYW HHY HHZ HVGLF HZ~ IX1 J0M J5H JPC KBYEO KQQ L7B LATKE LAW LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES M68 MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MVM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ NNB O66 O9- OHT OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 QRW R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TEORI UB1 V2E VH1 W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WHWMO WIB WIH WIJ WIK WJL WOHZO WQJ WVDHM WXI WXSBR X7M XG1 XPP XV2 YQI YQJ ZGI ZXP ZZTAW ~IA ~KM ~WT AAMMB AEFGJ AEYWJ AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AIDQK AIDYY AIQQE BSCLL AEUQT AFPWT RWI WRC WUP AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 7TO H94 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5144-b38178365d0e209fd773a34157998cfe24b2bfbb643f3f7b9ae24faee34303f63 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0022-3417 1096-9896 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 11:37:57 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 03:11:47 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:08:48 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:11:10 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:21:07 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:05:12 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:56:22 EST 2025 Sun Sep 21 06:16:47 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 09:43:01 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | Immunohistochemistry Prognosis Biology Malignant tumor High grade p53 serous Anatomic pathology TP53 Gene Pelvic cavity carcinoma Serous carcinoma pelvic TP53 Cancer Tumor suppressor gene High malignancy |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 Copyright 2010 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5144-b38178365d0e209fd773a34157998cfe24b2bfbb643f3f7b9ae24faee34303f63 |
Notes | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.2744 Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Unit - No. INRUA006045 National Cancer Institute of Canada - No. 017051 Cheryl Brown Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Unit of the British Columbia Cancer Agency ArticleID:PATH2744 istex:FF62573848A5825AC16C7ED6A1DFD1072E373A25 No conflicts of interest were declared. ark:/67375/WNG-HSC6Q451-W ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 |
PMID | 20629008 |
PQID | 754021107 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_907167709 proquest_miscellaneous_754021107 pubmed_primary_20629008 pascalfrancis_primary_23175406 crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_path_2744 crossref_primary_10_1002_path_2744 wiley_primary_10_1002_path_2744_PATH2744 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_HSC6Q451_W fao_agris_US201301888024 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | October 2010 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2010-10-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2010 text: October 2010 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Chichester, UK |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Chichester, UK – name: Chichester – name: England |
PublicationTitle | The Journal of pathology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J. Pathol |
PublicationYear | 2010 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd Wiley |
Publisher_xml | – name: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd – name: Wiley |
References | Yemelyanova A, Vang R, Shih IM, et al. Correlation of immunohistochemical staining patterns of p53 with mutational analysis in ovarian carcinomas. Mod Pathol 2009; 22: 221A. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009; 59: 225-249. du Bois A, Lück HJ, Meier W, et al. A randomized clinical trial of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95: 1320-1329. de Graeff P, Crijns AP, de Jong S, et al. Modest effect of p53, EGFR and HER-2/neu on prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2009; 101: 149-159. Havrilesky L, Darcy M, Hamdan H, et al. Prognostic significance of p53 mutation and p53 overexpression in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 3814-3825. Salani R, Kurman RJ, Giuntoli R, et al. Assessment of TP53 mutation using purified tissue samples of ovarian serous carcinomas reveals a higher mutation rate than previously reported and does not correlate with drug resistance. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008; 18: 487-491. Leversha MA, Fielding P, Watson S, et al. Expression of p53, pRB, and p16 in lung tumours: a validation study on tissue microarrays. J Pathol 2003; 200: 610-619. Nenutil R, Smardova J, Pavlova S, et al. Discriminating functional and non-functional p53 in human tumours by p53 and MDM2 immunohistochemistry. J Pathol 2005; 207: 251-259. Prentice LM, Klausen C, Kalloger S, et al. Kisspeptin and GPR54 immunoreactivity in a cohort of 518 patients defines favourable prognosis and clear cell subtype in ovarian carcinoma. BMC Med 2007; 5: 33. Hall PA, McCluggage WG. Assessing p53 in clinical contexts: unlearned lessons and new perspectives. J Pathol 2006; 208: 1-6. Bali A, O'Brien PM, Edwards LS, et al. Cyclin D1, p53, and p21Waf1/Cip1 expression is predictive of poor clinical outcome in serous epithelial ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 5168-5177. Singer G, Stöhr R, Cope L, et al. Patterns of p53 mutations separate ovarian serous borderline tumors and low- and high-grade carcinomas and provide support for a new model of ovarian carcinogenesis: a mutational analysis with immunohistochemical correlation. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29: 218-224. Gilks CB, Prat J. Ovarian carcinoma pathology and genetics: recent advances. Hum Pathol 2009; 40: 1213-1223. Robles AI, Harris CC. Clinical outcomes and correlates of TP53 mutations and cancer. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol 2010; 2: a001016. Salvador S, Gilks B, Köbel M, et al. The Fallopian tube: primary site of most pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009; 19: 58-64. Köbel M, Huntsman D, Gilks CB. Critical molecular abnormalities in high-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. Expert Rev Mol Med 2008; 10: e22. Poeta ML, Manola J, Goldwasser MA, et al. TP53 mutations and survival in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2552-2561. Saegusa M, Machida B D, Okayasu I. Possible associations among expression of p14(ARF), p16(INK4a), p21(WAF1/CIP1), p27(KIP1), and p53 accumulation and the balance of apoptosis and cell proliferation in ovarian carcinomas. Cancer 2001; 92: 1177-1189. Crum CP. Intercepting pelvic cancer in the distal Fallopian tube: theories and realities. Mol Oncol 2009; 3: 165-170. Köbel M, Kalloger SE, Santos JL, et al. Tumor type and substage predict survival in stage I and II ovarian carcinoma: insights and implications. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 116: 50-56. Malpica A, Deavers MT, Tornos C, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variability of a two-tier system for grading ovarian serous carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2007; 31: 1168-1174. Terry J, Torlakovic EE, Garratt J, et al. Implementation of a Canadian External Quality Assurance Program for Breast Cancer Biomarkers: An Initiative of Canadian Quality Control in Immunohistochemistry (cIQc) and Canadian Association of Pathologists (CAP) National Standards Committee/Immunohistochemistry. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2009; 17: 375-382. Ahmed AA, Etemadmoghadam D, Temple J, et al. Driver mutations in TP53 are ubiquitous in high grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. J Pathol 2010; 221: 49-56. Lassus H, Leminen A, Lundin J, et al. Distinct subtypes of serous ovarian carcinoma identified by p53 determination. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 91: 504-512. Köbel M, Kalloger SE, Boyd N, et al. Ovarian carcinoma subtypes are different diseases: implications for biomarker studies. PLoS Med 2008; 5: e232. Ho ES, Lai CR, Hsieh YT, et al. p53 mutation is infrequent in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 80: 189-193. Madore J, Ren F, Filali-Mouhim A, et al. Characterization of the molecular differences between ovarian endometrioid carcinoma and ovarian serous carcinoma. J Pathol 2010; 220: 392-400. Gilks CB, Ionescu DN, Kalloger SE, et al. Tumor cell type can be reproducibly diagnosed and is of independent prognostic significance in patients with maximally debulked ovarian carcinoma. Hum Pathol 2008; 39: 1239-1251. Köbel M, Kalloger SE, Huntsman DG, et al. Differences in tumor type in low-stage versus high-stage ovarian carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2010; 29: 203-211. Shahin MS, Hughes JH, Sood AK, et al. The prognostic significance of p53 tumor suppressor gene alterations in ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 2000; 89: 2006-2017. Alkushi A, Lim P, Coldman A, et al. Interpretation of p53 immunoreactivity in endometrial carcinoma: establishing a clinically relevant cut-off level. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2004; 23: 129-137. 2001; 92 2009; 22 2009; 40 2000; 89 2008; 18 2004; 23 2008; 39 2010; 220 2010; 221 2008; 5 2008; 10 2007; 31 2003; 95 2005; 29 2004; 10 2001; 80 2007; 357 2006; 208 2003; 91 2010; 29 2010; 116 2005; 207 2009; 101 2007; 5 2009; 3 2009; 19 2010; 2 2003; 200 2009; 59 2003; 21 2009; 17 e_1_2_7_5_2 e_1_2_7_4_2 e_1_2_7_3_2 e_1_2_7_2_2 e_1_2_7_9_2 e_1_2_7_8_2 e_1_2_7_7_2 e_1_2_7_6_2 e_1_2_7_19_2 e_1_2_7_18_2 e_1_2_7_17_2 e_1_2_7_16_2 e_1_2_7_15_2 e_1_2_7_14_2 e_1_2_7_12_2 e_1_2_7_11_2 e_1_2_7_10_2 e_1_2_7_26_2 e_1_2_7_27_2 e_1_2_7_28_2 e_1_2_7_29_2 e_1_2_7_25_2 e_1_2_7_24_2 e_1_2_7_30_2 e_1_2_7_23_2 e_1_2_7_31_2 e_1_2_7_22_2 e_1_2_7_32_2 e_1_2_7_21_2 e_1_2_7_20_2 Yemelyanova A (e_1_2_7_13_2) 2009; 22 |
References_xml | – reference: Salvador S, Gilks B, Köbel M, et al. The Fallopian tube: primary site of most pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009; 19: 58-64. – reference: Köbel M, Kalloger SE, Huntsman DG, et al. Differences in tumor type in low-stage versus high-stage ovarian carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2010; 29: 203-211. – reference: Lassus H, Leminen A, Lundin J, et al. Distinct subtypes of serous ovarian carcinoma identified by p53 determination. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 91: 504-512. – reference: Shahin MS, Hughes JH, Sood AK, et al. The prognostic significance of p53 tumor suppressor gene alterations in ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 2000; 89: 2006-2017. – reference: Leversha MA, Fielding P, Watson S, et al. Expression of p53, pRB, and p16 in lung tumours: a validation study on tissue microarrays. J Pathol 2003; 200: 610-619. – reference: Crum CP. Intercepting pelvic cancer in the distal Fallopian tube: theories and realities. Mol Oncol 2009; 3: 165-170. – reference: Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009; 59: 225-249. – reference: Singer G, Stöhr R, Cope L, et al. Patterns of p53 mutations separate ovarian serous borderline tumors and low- and high-grade carcinomas and provide support for a new model of ovarian carcinogenesis: a mutational analysis with immunohistochemical correlation. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29: 218-224. – reference: Ho ES, Lai CR, Hsieh YT, et al. p53 mutation is infrequent in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 80: 189-193. – reference: Madore J, Ren F, Filali-Mouhim A, et al. Characterization of the molecular differences between ovarian endometrioid carcinoma and ovarian serous carcinoma. J Pathol 2010; 220: 392-400. – reference: Bali A, O'Brien PM, Edwards LS, et al. Cyclin D1, p53, and p21Waf1/Cip1 expression is predictive of poor clinical outcome in serous epithelial ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 5168-5177. – reference: Ahmed AA, Etemadmoghadam D, Temple J, et al. Driver mutations in TP53 are ubiquitous in high grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. J Pathol 2010; 221: 49-56. – reference: Malpica A, Deavers MT, Tornos C, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variability of a two-tier system for grading ovarian serous carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2007; 31: 1168-1174. – reference: du Bois A, Lück HJ, Meier W, et al. A randomized clinical trial of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95: 1320-1329. – reference: Saegusa M, Machida B D, Okayasu I. Possible associations among expression of p14(ARF), p16(INK4a), p21(WAF1/CIP1), p27(KIP1), and p53 accumulation and the balance of apoptosis and cell proliferation in ovarian carcinomas. Cancer 2001; 92: 1177-1189. – reference: Prentice LM, Klausen C, Kalloger S, et al. Kisspeptin and GPR54 immunoreactivity in a cohort of 518 patients defines favourable prognosis and clear cell subtype in ovarian carcinoma. BMC Med 2007; 5: 33. – reference: Salani R, Kurman RJ, Giuntoli R, et al. Assessment of TP53 mutation using purified tissue samples of ovarian serous carcinomas reveals a higher mutation rate than previously reported and does not correlate with drug resistance. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008; 18: 487-491. – reference: Havrilesky L, Darcy M, Hamdan H, et al. Prognostic significance of p53 mutation and p53 overexpression in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 3814-3825. – reference: Köbel M, Kalloger SE, Santos JL, et al. Tumor type and substage predict survival in stage I and II ovarian carcinoma: insights and implications. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 116: 50-56. – reference: Köbel M, Huntsman D, Gilks CB. Critical molecular abnormalities in high-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. Expert Rev Mol Med 2008; 10: e22. – reference: Nenutil R, Smardova J, Pavlova S, et al. Discriminating functional and non-functional p53 in human tumours by p53 and MDM2 immunohistochemistry. J Pathol 2005; 207: 251-259. – reference: Köbel M, Kalloger SE, Boyd N, et al. Ovarian carcinoma subtypes are different diseases: implications for biomarker studies. PLoS Med 2008; 5: e232. – reference: Yemelyanova A, Vang R, Shih IM, et al. Correlation of immunohistochemical staining patterns of p53 with mutational analysis in ovarian carcinomas. Mod Pathol 2009; 22: 221A. – reference: de Graeff P, Crijns AP, de Jong S, et al. Modest effect of p53, EGFR and HER-2/neu on prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2009; 101: 149-159. – reference: Alkushi A, Lim P, Coldman A, et al. Interpretation of p53 immunoreactivity in endometrial carcinoma: establishing a clinically relevant cut-off level. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2004; 23: 129-137. – reference: Gilks CB, Ionescu DN, Kalloger SE, et al. Tumor cell type can be reproducibly diagnosed and is of independent prognostic significance in patients with maximally debulked ovarian carcinoma. Hum Pathol 2008; 39: 1239-1251. – reference: Terry J, Torlakovic EE, Garratt J, et al. Implementation of a Canadian External Quality Assurance Program for Breast Cancer Biomarkers: An Initiative of Canadian Quality Control in Immunohistochemistry (cIQc) and Canadian Association of Pathologists (CAP) National Standards Committee/Immunohistochemistry. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2009; 17: 375-382. – reference: Hall PA, McCluggage WG. Assessing p53 in clinical contexts: unlearned lessons and new perspectives. J Pathol 2006; 208: 1-6. – reference: Poeta ML, Manola J, Goldwasser MA, et al. TP53 mutations and survival in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2552-2561. – reference: Robles AI, Harris CC. Clinical outcomes and correlates of TP53 mutations and cancer. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol 2010; 2: a001016. – reference: Gilks CB, Prat J. Ovarian carcinoma pathology and genetics: recent advances. Hum Pathol 2009; 40: 1213-1223. – volume: 19 start-page: 58 year: 2009 end-page: 64 article-title: The Fallopian tube: primary site of most pelvic high‐grade serous carcinomas publication-title: Int J Gynecol Cancer – volume: 10 start-page: 5168 year: 2004 end-page: 5177 article-title: Cyclin D1, p53, and p21Waf1/Cip1 expression is predictive of poor clinical outcome in serous epithelial ovarian cancer publication-title: Clin Cancer Res – volume: 207 start-page: 251 year: 2005 end-page: 259 article-title: Discriminating functional and non‐functional p53 in human tumours by p53 and MDM2 immunohistochemistry publication-title: J Pathol – volume: 21 start-page: 3814 year: 2003 end-page: 3825 article-title: Prognostic significance of p53 mutation and p53 overexpression in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study publication-title: J Clin Oncol – volume: 29 start-page: 203 year: 2010 end-page: 211 article-title: Differences in tumor type in low‐stage versus high‐stage ovarian carcinomas publication-title: Int J Gynecol Pathol – volume: 5 start-page: e232 year: 2008 article-title: Ovarian carcinoma subtypes are different diseases: implications for biomarker studies publication-title: PLoS Med – volume: 220 start-page: 392 year: 2010 end-page: 400 article-title: Characterization of the molecular differences between ovarian endometrioid carcinoma and ovarian serous carcinoma publication-title: J Pathol – volume: 18 start-page: 487 year: 2008 end-page: 491 article-title: Assessment of TP53 mutation using purified tissue samples of ovarian serous carcinomas reveals a higher mutation rate than previously reported and does not correlate with drug resistance publication-title: Int J Gynecol Cancer – volume: 200 start-page: 610 year: 2003 end-page: 619 article-title: Expression of p53, pRB, and p16 in lung tumours: a validation study on tissue microarrays publication-title: J Pathol – volume: 357 start-page: 2552 year: 2007 end-page: 2561 article-title: TP53 mutations and survival in squamous‐cell carcinoma of the head and neck publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 5 start-page: 33 year: 2007 article-title: Kisspeptin and GPR54 immunoreactivity in a cohort of 518 patients defines favourable prognosis and clear cell subtype in ovarian carcinoma publication-title: BMC Med – volume: 40 start-page: 1213 year: 2009 end-page: 1223 article-title: Ovarian carcinoma pathology and genetics: recent advances publication-title: Hum Pathol – volume: 10 start-page: e22 year: 2008 article-title: Critical molecular abnormalities in high‐grade serous carcinoma of the ovary publication-title: Expert Rev Mol Med – volume: 3 start-page: 165 year: 2009 end-page: 170 article-title: Intercepting pelvic cancer in the distal Fallopian tube: theories and realities publication-title: Mol Oncol – volume: 101 start-page: 149 year: 2009 end-page: 159 article-title: Modest effect of p53, EGFR and HER‐2/neu on prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta‐analysis publication-title: Br J Cancer – volume: 39 start-page: 1239 year: 2008 end-page: 1251 article-title: Tumor cell type can be reproducibly diagnosed and is of independent prognostic significance in patients with maximally debulked ovarian carcinoma publication-title: Hum Pathol – volume: 89 start-page: 2006 year: 2000 end-page: 2017 article-title: The prognostic significance of p53 tumor suppressor gene alterations in ovarian carcinoma publication-title: Cancer – volume: 31 start-page: 1168 year: 2007 end-page: 1174 article-title: Interobserver and intraobserver variability of a two‐tier system for grading ovarian serous carcinoma publication-title: Am J Surg Pathol – volume: 92 start-page: 1177 year: 2001 end-page: 1189 article-title: Possible associations among expression of p14(ARF), p16(INK4a), p21(WAF1/CIP1), p27(KIP1), and p53 accumulation and the balance of apoptosis and cell proliferation in ovarian carcinomas publication-title: Cancer – volume: 116 start-page: 50 year: 2010 end-page: 56 article-title: Tumor type and substage predict survival in stage I and II ovarian carcinoma: insights and implications publication-title: Gynecol Oncol – volume: 95 start-page: 1320 year: 2003 end-page: 1329 article-title: A randomized clinical trial of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as first‐line treatment of ovarian cancer publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst – volume: 2 start-page: a001016 year: 2010 article-title: Clinical outcomes and correlates of TP53 mutations and cancer publication-title: Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol – volume: 17 start-page: 375 year: 2009 end-page: 382 article-title: Implementation of a Canadian External Quality Assurance Program for Breast Cancer Biomarkers: An Initiative of Canadian Quality Control in Immunohistochemistry (cIQc) and Canadian Association of Pathologists (CAP) National Standards Committee/Immunohistochemistry publication-title: Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol – volume: 23 start-page: 129 year: 2004 end-page: 137 article-title: Interpretation of p53 immunoreactivity in endometrial carcinoma: establishing a clinically relevant cut‐off level publication-title: Int J Gynecol Pathol – volume: 80 start-page: 189 year: 2001 end-page: 193 article-title: p53 mutation is infrequent in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary publication-title: Gynecol Oncol – volume: 29 start-page: 218 year: 2005 end-page: 224 article-title: Patterns of p53 mutations separate ovarian serous borderline tumors and low‐ and high‐grade carcinomas and provide support for a new model of ovarian carcinogenesis: a mutational analysis with immunohistochemical correlation publication-title: Am J Surg Pathol – volume: 221 start-page: 49 year: 2010 end-page: 56 article-title: Driver mutations in TP53 are ubiquitous in high grade serous carcinoma of the ovary publication-title: J Pathol – volume: 59 start-page: 225 year: 2009 end-page: 249 article-title: Cancer statistics, 2009 publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin – volume: 91 start-page: 504 year: 2003 end-page: 512 article-title: Distinct subtypes of serous ovarian carcinoma identified by p53 determination publication-title: Gynecol Oncol – volume: 208 start-page: 1 year: 2006 end-page: 6 article-title: Assessing p53 in clinical contexts: unlearned lessons and new perspectives publication-title: J Pathol – volume: 22 start-page: 221A year: 2009 article-title: Correlation of immunohistochemical staining patterns of p53 with mutational analysis in ovarian carcinomas publication-title: Mod Pathol – ident: e_1_2_7_7_2 doi: 10.1097/PAI.0b013e31819adacf – ident: e_1_2_7_24_2 doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-5-33 – ident: e_1_2_7_25_2 doi: 10.1002/path.1374 – ident: e_1_2_7_15_2 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.11.052 – ident: e_1_2_7_14_2 doi: 10.1002/path.1838 – ident: e_1_2_7_29_2 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073770 – ident: e_1_2_7_23_2 doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31803199b0 – ident: e_1_2_7_32_2 doi: 10.1006/gyno.2000.6025 – volume: 22 start-page: 221A year: 2009 ident: e_1_2_7_13_2 article-title: Correlation of immunohistochemical staining patterns of p53 with mutational analysis in ovarian carcinomas publication-title: Mod Pathol – ident: e_1_2_7_11_2 doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001101)89:9<2006::AID-CNCR18>3.0.CO;2-7 – ident: e_1_2_7_22_2 doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2008.01.003 – ident: e_1_2_7_20_2 doi: 10.1093/jnci/djg036 – ident: e_1_2_7_18_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01039.x – ident: e_1_2_7_10_2 doi: 10.1097/00004347-200404000-00007 – ident: e_1_2_7_16_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.08.034 – ident: e_1_2_7_3_2 doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2009.01.004 – ident: e_1_2_7_5_2 doi: 10.3322/caac.20006 – ident: e_1_2_7_19_2 doi: 10.1002/path.2696 – ident: e_1_2_7_9_2 doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0751 – ident: e_1_2_7_21_2 doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.017 – ident: e_1_2_7_8_2 doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010901)92:5<1177::AID-CNCR1436>3.0.CO;2-5 – ident: e_1_2_7_28_2 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001016 – ident: e_1_2_7_2_2 doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e318199009c – ident: e_1_2_7_30_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.029 – ident: e_1_2_7_31_2 doi: 10.1002/path.2659 – ident: e_1_2_7_12_2 doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000146025.91953.8d – ident: e_1_2_7_27_2 doi: 10.1002/path.1913 – ident: e_1_2_7_4_2 doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e3181c042b6 – ident: e_1_2_7_17_2 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050232 – ident: e_1_2_7_26_2 doi: 10.1017/S146239940800077X – ident: e_1_2_7_6_2 doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605112 |
SSID | ssj0009955 |
Score | 2.382756 |
Snippet | Studies on the p53 expression and outcome for women with ovarian carcinoma have produced conflicting results. The observed heterogeneity may be due to the... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref wiley istex fao |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 191 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Age Aged Aged, 80 and over Antibodies Biological and medical sciences Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism carcinoma Cell survival Clear cells Clinical trials Combined Modality Therapy Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous - genetics Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous - metabolism Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous - pathology Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous - therapy Epidemiologic Methods Female Humans Immunohistochemistry Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Medical sciences Middle Aged Multivariate analysis Mutation Neoplasm Staging Neoplasm, Residual Nuclei Ovarian carcinoma Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics Ovarian Neoplasms - metabolism Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology Ovarian Neoplasms - therapy p53 p53 protein Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques pelvic Pelvis Prognosis Regression analysis serous Surgery TP53 Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 - metabolism Tumors Young Adult |
Title | biological and clinical value of p53 expression in pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-HSC6Q451-W/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fpath.2744 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20629008 https://www.proquest.com/docview/754021107 https://www.proquest.com/docview/907167709 |
Volume | 222 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBZpDqWXtukrbpsgSim9eGPradNTSJouhYS2yZIcAkKypRASvMs-IPTUn9Df2F-SGb-WLQmU3ow1Mmg0M_pkjb4h5H3hVanzVMQ-kS4WRebiLFgdS6-VcjaVweHd4cMjNRyJr2fybI186u7CNPwQ_Q839Iw6XqODWzfbWZKGYsXeAfLbQfxNuULe_P0fS-qoPJeyZwoXqe5YhRK20_dcWYseBDsGhIrKvcEMSTsDJYWmusVd8HMVzdbL0cETct4NpMlCuRos5m5Q_PyL4_E_R_qUPG5hKt1t7GqDrPnqGXl42B7EPyfnYF60IXDCWaa2Kml3yZIigbin40AnklN_06baVvSyohN_DaGJIknyn1-_L6a29BScYLyY0QKrGlWYrvSCjA4-n-wN47ZQQ1wA3hKxQ5q_jCtZJp4leSi15haULjVs5orgmXDMBecA_QQetMstvArWey5gBQ2KvyTr1bjym4RagBOKs8BLxkXmC6tsiZzxSiXBJ1pF5GM3ZaZoWcyxmMa1afiXmUFtGdRWRN71opOGuuMuoU2Yd2MvIKSa0THDg9w0g6DGoOlDbQx9Zzu9wjQ4Lc3p0RczPN5T34VMzWlEtlespe_AEJwBYooI7czHgPfikYytPKjWYHO9Bb9fJAcQqLRO8oi8aixv-f1EsRxAHCiltp_7h2m-7Z4M8eH1v4u-IY_qVIk6c_EtWZ9PF34LENjcbdeudgs-oir9 |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELbaIgEX3tDwKBZCiEu2ieNHInGpCmWB7grortpDkWUndoVaZVfbXanixE_gN_JLmMlrtaiVELcoGUfyeGb82R5_Q8jL3MlCZTEPXSRsyPPUhqk3KhROSWlNLLzFu8ODoeyP-ccjcbRG3rR3YWp-iG7DDT2jitfo4Lghvb1kDcWSvT0kuFsn1zgADVx6vf26JI_KMiE6rnAeq5ZXKGLbXdOV2WjdmwlgVFTvBeZImnNQk6_rW1wGQFfxbDUh7d0m39qu1Hkop73F3PbyH3-xPP5vX--QWw1SpTu1ad0la668R64PmrP4--QYLIzWHE440NSUBW3vWVLkEHd04ulUJNRdNNm2Jf1e0qk7g-hEkSf5989fJzNTOAp-MFmc0xwLG5WYsfSAjPfejXb7YVOrIcwBcvHQItNfmkhRRI5FmS-USgxoXShYz-XeMW6Z9dYCAPKJVzYz8Mob5xIOk6iXyUOyUU5Kt0moAUQhE-aTgiU8dbmRpkDaeCkj7yIlA_K6HTOdN0TmWE_jTNcUzEyjtjRqKyAvOtFpzd5xmdAmDLw2JxBV9fiA4VlunEJcY_DpVWUNXWMzO8VMOCX04fC97h_syi9cxPowIFsr5tI1YIjPADQFhLb2o8GB8VTGlA5Uq_FztQq_WiQDHCiVirKAPKpNb_n_SLIMcBwopTKgq7upP--M-vjw-N9Fn5Mb_dFgX-9_GH56Qm5WmRNVIuNTsjGfLdwzAGRzu1X53R_gMy8c |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBZJCqGXps_EaZuKUkov3tiyHjY9hbTb7SNL2mRJDgEh2VIoCd5lswuhp_6E_sb-ks74tWxJoPRmrJFBo5nRJ2v0DSGvcicLlcU8dJGwIc9TG6beqFA4JaU1sfAW7w4fDOVgxD-ditMV8ra9C1PzQ3Q_3NAzqniNDj4p_O6CNBQr9vaQ326V3OESkAQiom8L7qgsE6KjCuexammFIrbbdV1ajFa9GQNERe1eY4qkuQIt-bq8xU34cxnOVutRf4OctSOp01AuevOZ7eU__iJ5_M-h3if3GpxK92rDekBWXPmQrB80J_GPyBnYF60ZnHCaqSkL2t6ypMgg7ujY04lIqLtucm1L-r2kE3cJsYkiS_Lvn7_Op6ZwFLxgPL-iOZY1KjFf6TEZ9d8f7w_CplJDmAPg4qFFnr80kaKIHIsyXyiVGFC6ULCby71j3DLrrQX44xOvbGbglTfOJRyWUC-TJ2StHJdui1ADeEImzCcFS3jqciNNgaTxUkbeRUoG5E07ZTpvaMyxmsalrgmYmUZtadRWQF52opOau-MmoS2Yd23OIabq0RHDk9w4hajGoOl1ZQxdZzO9wDw4JfTJ8IMeHO3Lr1zE-iQgO0vW0nVgiM4AMgWEtuajwX3xTMaUDlSrsbnag98ukgEKlEpFWUA2a8tbfD-SLAMUB0qp7Of2YerDveMBPmz_u-gLsn74rq-_fBx-fkruVmkTVRbjM7I2m87dc0BjM7tTed0fL_otyw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=biological+and+clinical+value+of+p53+expression+in+pelvic+high-grade+serous+carcinomas&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+pathology&rft.au=K%C3%B6bel%2C+Martin&rft.au=Reuss%2C+Alexander&rft.au=Bois%2C+Andreas+du&rft.au=Kommoss%2C+Stefan&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.pub=John+Wiley+%26+Sons%2C+Ltd&rft.issn=0022-3417&rft.volume=222&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=198&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fpath.2744&rft.externalDocID=US201301888024 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-3417&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-3417&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-3417&client=summon |