biological and clinical value of p53 expression in pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas

Studies on the p53 expression and outcome for women with ovarian carcinoma have produced conflicting results. The observed heterogeneity may be due to the range of cut-offs used to define overexpression and the mix of histotypes of the study cohorts. We aimed to examine the association between p53 e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of pathology Vol. 222; no. 2; pp. 191 - 198
Main Authors Köbel, Martin, Reuss, Alexander, Bois, Andreas du, Kommoss, Stefan, Kommoss, Friedrich, Gao, Dongxia, Kalloger, Steve E, Huntsman, David G, Gilks, C. Blake
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.10.2010
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-3417
1096-9896
1096-9896
DOI10.1002/path.2744

Cover

Abstract Studies on the p53 expression and outcome for women with ovarian carcinoma have produced conflicting results. The observed heterogeneity may be due to the range of cut-offs used to define overexpression and the mix of histotypes of the study cohorts. We aimed to examine the association between p53 expression and biological properties of tumours as well as outcome in 502 pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) derived from two population-based cohorts from British Columbia representing cases with or without residual tumour after initial surgery, respectively, and one clinical trial cohort from Germany (AGO-OVAR-3). p53 expression was assessed on tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry using the DO-7 antibody. p53 expression was scored in three tiers as complete loss of expression, focal expression or overexpression (defined as more than 50% positive tumour cell nuclei) and correlated with survival using multivariate Cox regression models. p53 was completely absent in 30.3%, focally expressed in 12.0%, and overexpressed in 57.7% of HGSCs, which was an inverse pattern compared to clear cell and endometrioid types of ovarian carcinomas, where 76% and 69% of cases showed focal expression, respectively (p < 0.001, chi square test). Pelvic HGSCs show either complete absence of p53 expression or p53 overexpression in 88% of cases; thus, aberrant p53 expression is a ubiquitous feature of HGSCs. HGSCs with p53 overexpression were associated with a reduced risk of recurrence compared to cases with complete absence of p53 in the British Columbia cohort with residual tumour (HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.99) and for a combination of all three cohorts (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.89) in multivariate analysis including age, stage, residual tumour, and stratification by cohort. The association of complete absence of p53 expression with unfavourable outcome suggests functional differences of TP53 mutations underlying overexpression, compared to those underlying complete absence of expression. Copyright © 2010 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
AbstractList Studies on the p53 expression and outcome for women with ovarian carcinoma have produced conflicting results. The observed heterogeneity may be due to the range of cut-offs used to define overexpression and the mix of histotypes of the study cohorts. We aimed to examine the association between p53 expression and biological properties of tumours as well as outcome in 502 pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) derived from two population-based cohorts from British Columbia representing cases with or without residual tumour after initial surgery, respectively, and one clinical trial cohort from Germany (AGO-OVAR-3). p53 expression was assessed on tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry using the DO-7 antibody. p53 expression was scored in three tiers as complete loss of expression, focal expression or overexpression (defined as more than 50% positive tumour cell nuclei) and correlated with survival using multivariate Cox regression models. p53 was completely absent in 30.3%, focally expressed in 12.0%, and overexpressed in 57.7% of HGSCs, which was an inverse pattern compared to clear cell and endometrioid types of ovarian carcinomas, where 76% and 69% of cases showed focal expression, respectively (p < 0.001, chi square test). Pelvic HGSCs show either complete absence of p53 expression or p53 overexpression in 88% of cases; thus, aberrant p53 expression is a ubiquitous feature of HGSCs. HGSCs with p53 overexpression were associated with a reduced risk of recurrence compared to cases with complete absence of p53 in the British Columbia cohort with residual tumour (HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.99) and for a combination of all three cohorts (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.89) in multivariate analysis including age, stage, residual tumour, and stratification by cohort. The association of complete absence of p53 expression with unfavourable outcome suggests functional differences of TP53 mutations underlying overexpression, compared to those underlying complete absence of expression. Copyright © 2010 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Studies on the p53 expression and outcome for women with ovarian carcinoma have produced conflicting results. The observed heterogeneity may be due to the range of cut-offs used to define overexpression and the mix of histotypes of the study cohorts. We aimed to examine the association between p53 expression and biological properties of tumours as well as outcome in 502 pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) derived from two population-based cohorts from British Columbia representing cases with or without residual tumour after initial surgery, respectively, and one clinical trial cohort from Germany (AGO-OVAR-3). p53 expression was assessed on tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry using the DO-7 antibody. p53 expression was scored in three tiers as complete loss of expression, focal expression or overexpression (defined as more than 50% positive tumour cell nuclei) and correlated with survival using multivariate Cox regression models. p53 was completely absent in 30.3%, focally expressed in 12.0%, and overexpressed in 57.7% of HGSCs, which was an inverse pattern compared to clear cell and endometrioid types of ovarian carcinomas, where 76% and 69% of cases showed focal expression, respectively (p < 0.001, chi square test). Pelvic HGSCs show either complete absence of p53 expression or p53 overexpression in 88% of cases; thus, aberrant p53 expression is a ubiquitous feature of HGSCs. HGSCs with p53 overexpression were associated with a reduced risk of recurrence compared to cases with complete absence of p53 in the British Columbia cohort with residual tumour (HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.99) and for a combination of all three cohorts (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.89) in multivariate analysis including age, stage, residual tumour, and stratification by cohort. The association of complete absence of p53 expression with unfavourable outcome suggests functional differences of TP53 mutations underlying overexpression, compared to those underlying complete absence of expression.
Studies on the p53 expression and outcome for women with ovarian carcinoma have produced conflicting results. The observed heterogeneity may be due to the range of cut-offs used to define overexpression and the mix of histotypes of the study cohorts. We aimed to examine the association between p53 expression and biological properties of tumours as well as outcome in 502 pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) derived from two population-based cohorts from British Columbia representing cases with or without residual tumour after initial surgery, respectively, and one clinical trial cohort from Germany (AGO-OVAR-3). p53 expression was assessed on tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry using the DO-7 antibody. p53 expression was scored in three tiers as complete loss of expression, focal expression or overexpression (defined as more than 50% positive tumour cell nuclei) and correlated with survival using multivariate Cox regression models. p53 was completely absent in 30.3%, focally expressed in 12.0%, and overexpressed in 57.7% of HGSCs, which was an inverse pattern compared to clear cell and endometrioid types of ovarian carcinomas, where 76% and 69% of cases showed focal expression, respectively (p < 0.001, chi square test). Pelvic HGSCs show either complete absence of p53 expression or p53 overexpression in 88% of cases; thus, aberrant p53 expression is a ubiquitous feature of HGSCs. HGSCs with p53 overexpression were associated with a reduced risk of recurrence compared to cases with complete absence of p53 in the British Columbia cohort with residual tumour (HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.99) and for a combination of all three cohorts (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.89) in multivariate analysis including age, stage, residual tumour, and stratification by cohort. The association of complete absence of p53 expression with unfavourable outcome suggests functional differences of TP53 mutations underlying overexpression, compared to those underlying complete absence of expression.Studies on the p53 expression and outcome for women with ovarian carcinoma have produced conflicting results. The observed heterogeneity may be due to the range of cut-offs used to define overexpression and the mix of histotypes of the study cohorts. We aimed to examine the association between p53 expression and biological properties of tumours as well as outcome in 502 pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) derived from two population-based cohorts from British Columbia representing cases with or without residual tumour after initial surgery, respectively, and one clinical trial cohort from Germany (AGO-OVAR-3). p53 expression was assessed on tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry using the DO-7 antibody. p53 expression was scored in three tiers as complete loss of expression, focal expression or overexpression (defined as more than 50% positive tumour cell nuclei) and correlated with survival using multivariate Cox regression models. p53 was completely absent in 30.3%, focally expressed in 12.0%, and overexpressed in 57.7% of HGSCs, which was an inverse pattern compared to clear cell and endometrioid types of ovarian carcinomas, where 76% and 69% of cases showed focal expression, respectively (p < 0.001, chi square test). Pelvic HGSCs show either complete absence of p53 expression or p53 overexpression in 88% of cases; thus, aberrant p53 expression is a ubiquitous feature of HGSCs. HGSCs with p53 overexpression were associated with a reduced risk of recurrence compared to cases with complete absence of p53 in the British Columbia cohort with residual tumour (HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.99) and for a combination of all three cohorts (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.89) in multivariate analysis including age, stage, residual tumour, and stratification by cohort. The association of complete absence of p53 expression with unfavourable outcome suggests functional differences of TP53 mutations underlying overexpression, compared to those underlying complete absence of expression.
Studies on the p53 expression and outcome for women with ovarian carcinoma have produced conflicting results. The observed heterogeneity may be due to the range of cut‐offs used to define overexpression and the mix of histotypes of the study cohorts. We aimed to examine the association between p53 expression and biological properties of tumours as well as outcome in 502 pelvic high‐grade serous carcinomas (HGSCs) derived from two population‐based cohorts from British Columbia representing cases with or without residual tumour after initial surgery, respectively, and one clinical trial cohort from Germany (AGO‐OVAR‐3). p53 expression was assessed on tissue microarrays by immunohistochemistry using the DO‐7 antibody. p53 expression was scored in three tiers as complete loss of expression, focal expression or overexpression (defined as more than 50% positive tumour cell nuclei) and correlated with survival using multivariate Cox regression models. p53 was completely absent in 30.3%, focally expressed in 12.0%, and overexpressed in 57.7% of HGSCs, which was an inverse pattern compared to clear cell and endometrioid types of ovarian carcinomas, where 76% and 69% of cases showed focal expression, respectively ( p < 0.001, chi square test). Pelvic HGSCs show either complete absence of p53 expression or p53 overexpression in 88% of cases; thus, aberrant p53 expression is a ubiquitous feature of HGSCs. HGSCs with p53 overexpression were associated with a reduced risk of recurrence compared to cases with complete absence of p53 in the British Columbia cohort with residual tumour (HR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.51–0.99) and for a combination of all three cohorts (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.55–0.89) in multivariate analysis including age, stage, residual tumour, and stratification by cohort. The association of complete absence of p53 expression with unfavourable outcome suggests functional differences of TP53 mutations underlying overexpression, compared to those underlying complete absence of expression. Copyright © 2010 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Author Kalloger, Steve E
Reuss, Alexander
Köbel, Martin
Huntsman, David G
Kommoss, Stefan
Kommoss, Friedrich
Gao, Dongxia
Gilks, C Blake
Bois, Andreas du
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Köbel, Martin
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Reuss, Alexander
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Bois, Andreas du
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Kommoss, Stefan
– sequence: 5
  fullname: Kommoss, Friedrich
– sequence: 6
  fullname: Gao, Dongxia
– sequence: 7
  fullname: Kalloger, Steve E
– sequence: 8
  fullname: Huntsman, David G
– sequence: 9
  fullname: Gilks, C. Blake
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23175406$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20629008$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkc1u1DAUhS1URKeFBS8A3iDEIu31T-J4WY2gg1QVUFu6tByPPWPwJKmdKe3b4zAplRCIlWX7O0f3nnOA9tqutQi9JHBEAOhxr4f1ERWcP0EzArIqZC2rPTTLf7RgnIh9dJDSNwCQsiyfoX0KFZUA9Qx9bXwXupU3OmDdLrEJvv11udVha3HncF8ybO_6aFPyXYt9i3sbbr3Ba79aF6uolxYnG7ttwkZH49tuo9Nz9NTpkOyL6TxEVx_eX84Xxdmn04_zk7PClITzomE1ETWryiVYCtIthWA6D1wKKWvjLOUNbVzTVJw55kQjdX5y2lrGGTBXsUP0dufbx-5ma9OgNj4ZG4JubZ5ISRCkEgLkf0lRcqCEgMjkq4ncNhu7VH30Gx3v1UNoGXgzATrlqFzUrfHpkWNkNBuHO95xJnYpReuU8YMecopD1D4oAmqsT431qbG-rHj3h-LB9G_s5P7DB3v_b1B9PrlcTIpip_BpsHe_FTp-V5VgolTX56dqcTGvvvCSqOvMv97xTndKr2Le8eqCAmFA6roGytlPXVvAzg
CODEN JPTLAS
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1093_annonc_mdt464
crossref_primary_10_1002_path_5849
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2013_11_015
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph19074260
crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0000000000000251
crossref_primary_10_1002_path_3023
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13148_021_01130_5
crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0000000000000930
crossref_primary_10_1002_advs_202301930
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2011_01_005
crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0b013e31823732a9
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semdp_2021_10_006
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11684_023_1016_8
crossref_primary_10_3389_fbioe_2022_819183
crossref_primary_10_1155_2014_495754
crossref_primary_10_1038_modpathol_2013_102
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejcsup_2019_11_001
crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0000000000001713
crossref_primary_10_2174_0115672018253815230922070558
crossref_primary_10_1097_PAT_0b013e32835f2264
crossref_primary_10_3390_antiox10020187
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_humpath_2022_06_023
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13133343
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1701_2163_16_35322_1
crossref_primary_10_1111_cas_16252
crossref_primary_10_1136_jclinpath_2018_205634
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2020_109391
crossref_primary_10_1111_his_12664
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0030042
crossref_primary_10_3389_fimmu_2021_658922
crossref_primary_10_1038_bjc_2017_139
crossref_primary_10_4132_jptm_2020_06_01
crossref_primary_10_1002_cjp2_53
crossref_primary_10_1038_nrclinonc_2010_216
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1470_2045_13_70253_5
crossref_primary_10_1097_PAT_0b013e32835bd561
crossref_primary_10_1111_his_12029
crossref_primary_10_3727_096504016X14685034103671
crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0b013e31820c9ff3
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41379_022_01062_2
crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_24530
crossref_primary_10_1038_modpathol_2014_76
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_path_2010_12_009
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00428_019_02728_0
crossref_primary_10_1111_his_12033
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eurox_2022_100172
crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0000000000000291
crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_6569
crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0b013e31826a5399
crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0b013e31823bb1a1
crossref_primary_10_1002_cjp2_311
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_humpath_2015_06_002
crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0b013e31827f576a
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00428_014_1599_1
crossref_primary_10_1111_his_12286
crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0000000000000488
crossref_primary_10_1101_cshperspect_a026252
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00428_021_03132_3
crossref_primary_10_1038_modpathol_2010_215
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12920_023_01657_x
crossref_primary_10_1002_cjp2_109
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2012_04_021
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40661_016_0035_4
crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0b013e318272ff19
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_41706_z
crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0000000000000211
crossref_primary_10_1111_his_12971
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2012_06_022
crossref_primary_10_1177_10668969211065115
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_13_62146_7
crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0000000000000738
crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0b013e31820d20ba
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbcan_2024_189224
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygeno_2015_09_001
crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0b013e31826b4ea1
crossref_primary_10_1080_1828051X_2018_1551071
crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0b013e31822c8036
crossref_primary_10_1038_modpathol_2013_144
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_prp_2023_155020
crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0000000000000428
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semdp_2019_01_003
crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0b013e31824d7445
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pathol_2023_04_008
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41379_019_0356_z
crossref_primary_10_1093_pnasnexus_pgac128
crossref_primary_10_1111_his_12581
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41379_020_0614_0
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2559_2011_03907_x
crossref_primary_10_1038_srep26191
crossref_primary_10_3389_fimmu_2023_1221605
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2012_10_013
crossref_primary_10_18231_j_achr_2021_018
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0072162
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_015_1952_z
crossref_primary_10_5858_arpa_2016_0541_RA
crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0000000000000536
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0218618
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pathol_2017_09_010
crossref_primary_10_1111_his_12989
crossref_primary_10_1038_modpathol_2013_55
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pathol_2023_02_007
crossref_primary_10_1002_cncy_22596
crossref_primary_10_1097_PGP_0000000000000553
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mpdhp_2011_01_005
crossref_primary_10_1038_bjc_2015_471
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41379_021_00920_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2013_05_018
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_path_2016_01_003
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_53636_x
crossref_primary_10_1097_PAT_0b013e328348a6e7
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_805613
crossref_primary_10_1136_jclinpath_2011_200352
crossref_primary_10_5858_arpa_2021_0098_RA
crossref_primary_10_1038_modpathol_2011_211
crossref_primary_10_1111_his_12878
crossref_primary_10_1111_his_12516
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_017_5194_0
crossref_primary_10_1038_modpathol_2015_77
crossref_primary_10_1097_PAS_0000000000000640
crossref_primary_10_1038_bjc_2014_567
crossref_primary_10_1080_07357907_2020_1852411
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2020_01103
crossref_primary_10_3892_ol_2016_5083
crossref_primary_10_1186_1476_511X_12_152
Cites_doi 10.1097/PAI.0b013e31819adacf
10.1186/1741-7015-5-33
10.1002/path.1374
10.1200/JCO.2003.11.052
10.1002/path.1838
10.1056/NEJMoa073770
10.1097/PAS.0b013e31803199b0
10.1006/gyno.2000.6025
10.1002/1097-0142(20001101)89:9<2006::AID-CNCR18>3.0.CO;2-7
10.1016/j.humpath.2008.01.003
10.1093/jnci/djg036
10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01039.x
10.1097/00004347-200404000-00007
10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.08.034
10.1016/j.molonc.2009.01.004
10.3322/caac.20006
10.1002/path.2696
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0751
10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.017
10.1002/1097-0142(20010901)92:5<1177::AID-CNCR1436>3.0.CO;2-5
10.1101/cshperspect.a001016
10.1111/IGC.0b013e318199009c
10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.029
10.1002/path.2659
10.1097/01.pas.0000146025.91953.8d
10.1002/path.1913
10.1097/PGP.0b013e3181c042b6
10.1371/journal.pmed.0050232
10.1017/S146239940800077X
10.1038/sj.bjc.6605112
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2010 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
2015 INIST-CNRS
Copyright 2010 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2010 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
– notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS
– notice: Copyright 2010 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
DBID FBQ
BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
7TO
H94
DOI 10.1002/path.2744
DatabaseName AGRIS
Istex
CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic

CrossRef
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: FBQ
  name: AGRIS
  url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1096-9896
EndPage 198
ExternalDocumentID 20629008
23175406
10_1002_path_2744
PATH2744
ark_67375_WNG_HSC6Q451_W
US201301888024
Genre article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Cancer Institute of Canada
  funderid: 017051
– fundername: Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Unit
  funderid: INRUA006045
– fundername: Cheryl Brown Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Unit of the British Columbia Cancer Agency
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
.3N
.55
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
123
1KJ
1L6
1OB
1OC
1ZS
29L
31~
33P
3O-
3SF
3UE
3WU
4.4
4ZD
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5RE
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABIJN
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACIWK
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFFNX
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFRAH
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AGHNM
AHBTC
AHMBA
AI.
AIACR
AITYG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
C45
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FBQ
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GNP
GODZA
GSXLS
H.X
HBH
HF~
HGLYW
HHY
HHZ
HVGLF
HZ~
IX1
J0M
J5H
JPC
KBYEO
KQQ
L7B
LATKE
LAW
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
M68
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MVM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
NNB
O66
O9-
OHT
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
QRW
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
UB1
V2E
VH1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WH7
WHWMO
WIB
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WJL
WOHZO
WQJ
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
X7M
XG1
XPP
XV2
YQI
YQJ
ZGI
ZXP
ZZTAW
~IA
~KM
~WT
AAMMB
AEFGJ
AEYWJ
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AIDQK
AIDYY
AIQQE
BSCLL
AEUQT
AFPWT
RWI
WRC
WUP
AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
7TO
H94
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c5144-b38178365d0e209fd773a34157998cfe24b2bfbb643f3f7b9ae24faee34303f63
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0022-3417
1096-9896
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 11:37:57 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 03:11:47 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:08:48 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:11:10 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:21:07 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:05:12 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:56:22 EST 2025
Sun Sep 21 06:16:47 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 09:43:01 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Immunohistochemistry
Prognosis
Biology
Malignant tumor
High grade
p53
serous
Anatomic pathology
TP53 Gene
Pelvic cavity
carcinoma
Serous carcinoma
pelvic
TP53
Cancer
Tumor suppressor gene
High malignancy
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
Copyright 2010 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5144-b38178365d0e209fd773a34157998cfe24b2bfbb643f3f7b9ae24faee34303f63
Notes http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/path.2744
Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research Unit - No. INRUA006045
National Cancer Institute of Canada - No. 017051
Cheryl Brown Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Unit of the British Columbia Cancer Agency
ArticleID:PATH2744
istex:FF62573848A5825AC16C7ED6A1DFD1072E373A25
No conflicts of interest were declared.
ark:/67375/WNG-HSC6Q451-W
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
PMID 20629008
PQID 754021107
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_907167709
proquest_miscellaneous_754021107
pubmed_primary_20629008
pascalfrancis_primary_23175406
crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_path_2744
crossref_primary_10_1002_path_2744
wiley_primary_10_1002_path_2744_PATH2744
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_HSC6Q451_W
fao_agris_US201301888024
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate October 2010
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2010-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2010
  text: October 2010
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Chichester, UK
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Chichester, UK
– name: Chichester
– name: England
PublicationTitle The Journal of pathology
PublicationTitleAlternate J. Pathol
PublicationYear 2010
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Wiley
Publisher_xml – name: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
– name: Wiley
References Yemelyanova A, Vang R, Shih IM, et al. Correlation of immunohistochemical staining patterns of p53 with mutational analysis in ovarian carcinomas. Mod Pathol 2009; 22: 221A.
Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009; 59: 225-249.
du Bois A, Lück HJ, Meier W, et al. A randomized clinical trial of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95: 1320-1329.
de Graeff P, Crijns AP, de Jong S, et al. Modest effect of p53, EGFR and HER-2/neu on prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2009; 101: 149-159.
Havrilesky L, Darcy M, Hamdan H, et al. Prognostic significance of p53 mutation and p53 overexpression in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 3814-3825.
Salani R, Kurman RJ, Giuntoli R, et al. Assessment of TP53 mutation using purified tissue samples of ovarian serous carcinomas reveals a higher mutation rate than previously reported and does not correlate with drug resistance. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008; 18: 487-491.
Leversha MA, Fielding P, Watson S, et al. Expression of p53, pRB, and p16 in lung tumours: a validation study on tissue microarrays. J Pathol 2003; 200: 610-619.
Nenutil R, Smardova J, Pavlova S, et al. Discriminating functional and non-functional p53 in human tumours by p53 and MDM2 immunohistochemistry. J Pathol 2005; 207: 251-259.
Prentice LM, Klausen C, Kalloger S, et al. Kisspeptin and GPR54 immunoreactivity in a cohort of 518 patients defines favourable prognosis and clear cell subtype in ovarian carcinoma. BMC Med 2007; 5: 33.
Hall PA, McCluggage WG. Assessing p53 in clinical contexts: unlearned lessons and new perspectives. J Pathol 2006; 208: 1-6.
Bali A, O'Brien PM, Edwards LS, et al. Cyclin D1, p53, and p21Waf1/Cip1 expression is predictive of poor clinical outcome in serous epithelial ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 5168-5177.
Singer G, Stöhr R, Cope L, et al. Patterns of p53 mutations separate ovarian serous borderline tumors and low- and high-grade carcinomas and provide support for a new model of ovarian carcinogenesis: a mutational analysis with immunohistochemical correlation. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29: 218-224.
Gilks CB, Prat J. Ovarian carcinoma pathology and genetics: recent advances. Hum Pathol 2009; 40: 1213-1223.
Robles AI, Harris CC. Clinical outcomes and correlates of TP53 mutations and cancer. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol 2010; 2: a001016.
Salvador S, Gilks B, Köbel M, et al. The Fallopian tube: primary site of most pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009; 19: 58-64.
Köbel M, Huntsman D, Gilks CB. Critical molecular abnormalities in high-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. Expert Rev Mol Med 2008; 10: e22.
Poeta ML, Manola J, Goldwasser MA, et al. TP53 mutations and survival in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2552-2561.
Saegusa M, Machida B D, Okayasu I. Possible associations among expression of p14(ARF), p16(INK4a), p21(WAF1/CIP1), p27(KIP1), and p53 accumulation and the balance of apoptosis and cell proliferation in ovarian carcinomas. Cancer 2001; 92: 1177-1189.
Crum CP. Intercepting pelvic cancer in the distal Fallopian tube: theories and realities. Mol Oncol 2009; 3: 165-170.
Köbel M, Kalloger SE, Santos JL, et al. Tumor type and substage predict survival in stage I and II ovarian carcinoma: insights and implications. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 116: 50-56.
Malpica A, Deavers MT, Tornos C, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variability of a two-tier system for grading ovarian serous carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2007; 31: 1168-1174.
Terry J, Torlakovic EE, Garratt J, et al. Implementation of a Canadian External Quality Assurance Program for Breast Cancer Biomarkers: An Initiative of Canadian Quality Control in Immunohistochemistry (cIQc) and Canadian Association of Pathologists (CAP) National Standards Committee/Immunohistochemistry. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2009; 17: 375-382.
Ahmed AA, Etemadmoghadam D, Temple J, et al. Driver mutations in TP53 are ubiquitous in high grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. J Pathol 2010; 221: 49-56.
Lassus H, Leminen A, Lundin J, et al. Distinct subtypes of serous ovarian carcinoma identified by p53 determination. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 91: 504-512.
Köbel M, Kalloger SE, Boyd N, et al. Ovarian carcinoma subtypes are different diseases: implications for biomarker studies. PLoS Med 2008; 5: e232.
Ho ES, Lai CR, Hsieh YT, et al. p53 mutation is infrequent in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 80: 189-193.
Madore J, Ren F, Filali-Mouhim A, et al. Characterization of the molecular differences between ovarian endometrioid carcinoma and ovarian serous carcinoma. J Pathol 2010; 220: 392-400.
Gilks CB, Ionescu DN, Kalloger SE, et al. Tumor cell type can be reproducibly diagnosed and is of independent prognostic significance in patients with maximally debulked ovarian carcinoma. Hum Pathol 2008; 39: 1239-1251.
Köbel M, Kalloger SE, Huntsman DG, et al. Differences in tumor type in low-stage versus high-stage ovarian carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2010; 29: 203-211.
Shahin MS, Hughes JH, Sood AK, et al. The prognostic significance of p53 tumor suppressor gene alterations in ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 2000; 89: 2006-2017.
Alkushi A, Lim P, Coldman A, et al. Interpretation of p53 immunoreactivity in endometrial carcinoma: establishing a clinically relevant cut-off level. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2004; 23: 129-137.
2001; 92
2009; 22
2009; 40
2000; 89
2008; 18
2004; 23
2008; 39
2010; 220
2010; 221
2008; 5
2008; 10
2007; 31
2003; 95
2005; 29
2004; 10
2001; 80
2007; 357
2006; 208
2003; 91
2010; 29
2010; 116
2005; 207
2009; 101
2007; 5
2009; 3
2009; 19
2010; 2
2003; 200
2009; 59
2003; 21
2009; 17
e_1_2_7_5_2
e_1_2_7_4_2
e_1_2_7_3_2
e_1_2_7_2_2
e_1_2_7_9_2
e_1_2_7_8_2
e_1_2_7_7_2
e_1_2_7_6_2
e_1_2_7_19_2
e_1_2_7_18_2
e_1_2_7_17_2
e_1_2_7_16_2
e_1_2_7_15_2
e_1_2_7_14_2
e_1_2_7_12_2
e_1_2_7_11_2
e_1_2_7_10_2
e_1_2_7_26_2
e_1_2_7_27_2
e_1_2_7_28_2
e_1_2_7_29_2
e_1_2_7_25_2
e_1_2_7_24_2
e_1_2_7_30_2
e_1_2_7_23_2
e_1_2_7_31_2
e_1_2_7_22_2
e_1_2_7_32_2
e_1_2_7_21_2
e_1_2_7_20_2
Yemelyanova A (e_1_2_7_13_2) 2009; 22
References_xml – reference: Salvador S, Gilks B, Köbel M, et al. The Fallopian tube: primary site of most pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009; 19: 58-64.
– reference: Köbel M, Kalloger SE, Huntsman DG, et al. Differences in tumor type in low-stage versus high-stage ovarian carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2010; 29: 203-211.
– reference: Lassus H, Leminen A, Lundin J, et al. Distinct subtypes of serous ovarian carcinoma identified by p53 determination. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 91: 504-512.
– reference: Shahin MS, Hughes JH, Sood AK, et al. The prognostic significance of p53 tumor suppressor gene alterations in ovarian carcinoma. Cancer 2000; 89: 2006-2017.
– reference: Leversha MA, Fielding P, Watson S, et al. Expression of p53, pRB, and p16 in lung tumours: a validation study on tissue microarrays. J Pathol 2003; 200: 610-619.
– reference: Crum CP. Intercepting pelvic cancer in the distal Fallopian tube: theories and realities. Mol Oncol 2009; 3: 165-170.
– reference: Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009; 59: 225-249.
– reference: Singer G, Stöhr R, Cope L, et al. Patterns of p53 mutations separate ovarian serous borderline tumors and low- and high-grade carcinomas and provide support for a new model of ovarian carcinogenesis: a mutational analysis with immunohistochemical correlation. Am J Surg Pathol 2005; 29: 218-224.
– reference: Ho ES, Lai CR, Hsieh YT, et al. p53 mutation is infrequent in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol 2001; 80: 189-193.
– reference: Madore J, Ren F, Filali-Mouhim A, et al. Characterization of the molecular differences between ovarian endometrioid carcinoma and ovarian serous carcinoma. J Pathol 2010; 220: 392-400.
– reference: Bali A, O'Brien PM, Edwards LS, et al. Cyclin D1, p53, and p21Waf1/Cip1 expression is predictive of poor clinical outcome in serous epithelial ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 5168-5177.
– reference: Ahmed AA, Etemadmoghadam D, Temple J, et al. Driver mutations in TP53 are ubiquitous in high grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. J Pathol 2010; 221: 49-56.
– reference: Malpica A, Deavers MT, Tornos C, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variability of a two-tier system for grading ovarian serous carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2007; 31: 1168-1174.
– reference: du Bois A, Lück HJ, Meier W, et al. A randomized clinical trial of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as first-line treatment of ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95: 1320-1329.
– reference: Saegusa M, Machida B D, Okayasu I. Possible associations among expression of p14(ARF), p16(INK4a), p21(WAF1/CIP1), p27(KIP1), and p53 accumulation and the balance of apoptosis and cell proliferation in ovarian carcinomas. Cancer 2001; 92: 1177-1189.
– reference: Prentice LM, Klausen C, Kalloger S, et al. Kisspeptin and GPR54 immunoreactivity in a cohort of 518 patients defines favourable prognosis and clear cell subtype in ovarian carcinoma. BMC Med 2007; 5: 33.
– reference: Salani R, Kurman RJ, Giuntoli R, et al. Assessment of TP53 mutation using purified tissue samples of ovarian serous carcinomas reveals a higher mutation rate than previously reported and does not correlate with drug resistance. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2008; 18: 487-491.
– reference: Havrilesky L, Darcy M, Hamdan H, et al. Prognostic significance of p53 mutation and p53 overexpression in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 3814-3825.
– reference: Köbel M, Kalloger SE, Santos JL, et al. Tumor type and substage predict survival in stage I and II ovarian carcinoma: insights and implications. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 116: 50-56.
– reference: Köbel M, Huntsman D, Gilks CB. Critical molecular abnormalities in high-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary. Expert Rev Mol Med 2008; 10: e22.
– reference: Nenutil R, Smardova J, Pavlova S, et al. Discriminating functional and non-functional p53 in human tumours by p53 and MDM2 immunohistochemistry. J Pathol 2005; 207: 251-259.
– reference: Köbel M, Kalloger SE, Boyd N, et al. Ovarian carcinoma subtypes are different diseases: implications for biomarker studies. PLoS Med 2008; 5: e232.
– reference: Yemelyanova A, Vang R, Shih IM, et al. Correlation of immunohistochemical staining patterns of p53 with mutational analysis in ovarian carcinomas. Mod Pathol 2009; 22: 221A.
– reference: de Graeff P, Crijns AP, de Jong S, et al. Modest effect of p53, EGFR and HER-2/neu on prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2009; 101: 149-159.
– reference: Alkushi A, Lim P, Coldman A, et al. Interpretation of p53 immunoreactivity in endometrial carcinoma: establishing a clinically relevant cut-off level. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2004; 23: 129-137.
– reference: Gilks CB, Ionescu DN, Kalloger SE, et al. Tumor cell type can be reproducibly diagnosed and is of independent prognostic significance in patients with maximally debulked ovarian carcinoma. Hum Pathol 2008; 39: 1239-1251.
– reference: Terry J, Torlakovic EE, Garratt J, et al. Implementation of a Canadian External Quality Assurance Program for Breast Cancer Biomarkers: An Initiative of Canadian Quality Control in Immunohistochemistry (cIQc) and Canadian Association of Pathologists (CAP) National Standards Committee/Immunohistochemistry. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2009; 17: 375-382.
– reference: Hall PA, McCluggage WG. Assessing p53 in clinical contexts: unlearned lessons and new perspectives. J Pathol 2006; 208: 1-6.
– reference: Poeta ML, Manola J, Goldwasser MA, et al. TP53 mutations and survival in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2552-2561.
– reference: Robles AI, Harris CC. Clinical outcomes and correlates of TP53 mutations and cancer. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol 2010; 2: a001016.
– reference: Gilks CB, Prat J. Ovarian carcinoma pathology and genetics: recent advances. Hum Pathol 2009; 40: 1213-1223.
– volume: 19
  start-page: 58
  year: 2009
  end-page: 64
  article-title: The Fallopian tube: primary site of most pelvic high‐grade serous carcinomas
  publication-title: Int J Gynecol Cancer
– volume: 10
  start-page: 5168
  year: 2004
  end-page: 5177
  article-title: Cyclin D1, p53, and p21Waf1/Cip1 expression is predictive of poor clinical outcome in serous epithelial ovarian cancer
  publication-title: Clin Cancer Res
– volume: 207
  start-page: 251
  year: 2005
  end-page: 259
  article-title: Discriminating functional and non‐functional p53 in human tumours by p53 and MDM2 immunohistochemistry
  publication-title: J Pathol
– volume: 21
  start-page: 3814
  year: 2003
  end-page: 3825
  article-title: Prognostic significance of p53 mutation and p53 overexpression in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
– volume: 29
  start-page: 203
  year: 2010
  end-page: 211
  article-title: Differences in tumor type in low‐stage versus high‐stage ovarian carcinomas
  publication-title: Int J Gynecol Pathol
– volume: 5
  start-page: e232
  year: 2008
  article-title: Ovarian carcinoma subtypes are different diseases: implications for biomarker studies
  publication-title: PLoS Med
– volume: 220
  start-page: 392
  year: 2010
  end-page: 400
  article-title: Characterization of the molecular differences between ovarian endometrioid carcinoma and ovarian serous carcinoma
  publication-title: J Pathol
– volume: 18
  start-page: 487
  year: 2008
  end-page: 491
  article-title: Assessment of TP53 mutation using purified tissue samples of ovarian serous carcinomas reveals a higher mutation rate than previously reported and does not correlate with drug resistance
  publication-title: Int J Gynecol Cancer
– volume: 200
  start-page: 610
  year: 2003
  end-page: 619
  article-title: Expression of p53, pRB, and p16 in lung tumours: a validation study on tissue microarrays
  publication-title: J Pathol
– volume: 357
  start-page: 2552
  year: 2007
  end-page: 2561
  article-title: TP53 mutations and survival in squamous‐cell carcinoma of the head and neck
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 5
  start-page: 33
  year: 2007
  article-title: Kisspeptin and GPR54 immunoreactivity in a cohort of 518 patients defines favourable prognosis and clear cell subtype in ovarian carcinoma
  publication-title: BMC Med
– volume: 40
  start-page: 1213
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1223
  article-title: Ovarian carcinoma pathology and genetics: recent advances
  publication-title: Hum Pathol
– volume: 10
  start-page: e22
  year: 2008
  article-title: Critical molecular abnormalities in high‐grade serous carcinoma of the ovary
  publication-title: Expert Rev Mol Med
– volume: 3
  start-page: 165
  year: 2009
  end-page: 170
  article-title: Intercepting pelvic cancer in the distal Fallopian tube: theories and realities
  publication-title: Mol Oncol
– volume: 101
  start-page: 149
  year: 2009
  end-page: 159
  article-title: Modest effect of p53, EGFR and HER‐2/neu on prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta‐analysis
  publication-title: Br J Cancer
– volume: 39
  start-page: 1239
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1251
  article-title: Tumor cell type can be reproducibly diagnosed and is of independent prognostic significance in patients with maximally debulked ovarian carcinoma
  publication-title: Hum Pathol
– volume: 89
  start-page: 2006
  year: 2000
  end-page: 2017
  article-title: The prognostic significance of p53 tumor suppressor gene alterations in ovarian carcinoma
  publication-title: Cancer
– volume: 31
  start-page: 1168
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1174
  article-title: Interobserver and intraobserver variability of a two‐tier system for grading ovarian serous carcinoma
  publication-title: Am J Surg Pathol
– volume: 92
  start-page: 1177
  year: 2001
  end-page: 1189
  article-title: Possible associations among expression of p14(ARF), p16(INK4a), p21(WAF1/CIP1), p27(KIP1), and p53 accumulation and the balance of apoptosis and cell proliferation in ovarian carcinomas
  publication-title: Cancer
– volume: 116
  start-page: 50
  year: 2010
  end-page: 56
  article-title: Tumor type and substage predict survival in stage I and II ovarian carcinoma: insights and implications
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
– volume: 95
  start-page: 1320
  year: 2003
  end-page: 1329
  article-title: A randomized clinical trial of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel as first‐line treatment of ovarian cancer
  publication-title: J Natl Cancer Inst
– volume: 2
  start-page: a001016
  year: 2010
  article-title: Clinical outcomes and correlates of TP53 mutations and cancer
  publication-title: Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol
– volume: 17
  start-page: 375
  year: 2009
  end-page: 382
  article-title: Implementation of a Canadian External Quality Assurance Program for Breast Cancer Biomarkers: An Initiative of Canadian Quality Control in Immunohistochemistry (cIQc) and Canadian Association of Pathologists (CAP) National Standards Committee/Immunohistochemistry
  publication-title: Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol
– volume: 23
  start-page: 129
  year: 2004
  end-page: 137
  article-title: Interpretation of p53 immunoreactivity in endometrial carcinoma: establishing a clinically relevant cut‐off level
  publication-title: Int J Gynecol Pathol
– volume: 80
  start-page: 189
  year: 2001
  end-page: 193
  article-title: p53 mutation is infrequent in clear cell carcinoma of the ovary
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
– volume: 29
  start-page: 218
  year: 2005
  end-page: 224
  article-title: Patterns of p53 mutations separate ovarian serous borderline tumors and low‐ and high‐grade carcinomas and provide support for a new model of ovarian carcinogenesis: a mutational analysis with immunohistochemical correlation
  publication-title: Am J Surg Pathol
– volume: 221
  start-page: 49
  year: 2010
  end-page: 56
  article-title: Driver mutations in TP53 are ubiquitous in high grade serous carcinoma of the ovary
  publication-title: J Pathol
– volume: 59
  start-page: 225
  year: 2009
  end-page: 249
  article-title: Cancer statistics, 2009
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin
– volume: 91
  start-page: 504
  year: 2003
  end-page: 512
  article-title: Distinct subtypes of serous ovarian carcinoma identified by p53 determination
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
– volume: 208
  start-page: 1
  year: 2006
  end-page: 6
  article-title: Assessing p53 in clinical contexts: unlearned lessons and new perspectives
  publication-title: J Pathol
– volume: 22
  start-page: 221A
  year: 2009
  article-title: Correlation of immunohistochemical staining patterns of p53 with mutational analysis in ovarian carcinomas
  publication-title: Mod Pathol
– ident: e_1_2_7_7_2
  doi: 10.1097/PAI.0b013e31819adacf
– ident: e_1_2_7_24_2
  doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-5-33
– ident: e_1_2_7_25_2
  doi: 10.1002/path.1374
– ident: e_1_2_7_15_2
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.11.052
– ident: e_1_2_7_14_2
  doi: 10.1002/path.1838
– ident: e_1_2_7_29_2
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073770
– ident: e_1_2_7_23_2
  doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31803199b0
– ident: e_1_2_7_32_2
  doi: 10.1006/gyno.2000.6025
– volume: 22
  start-page: 221A
  year: 2009
  ident: e_1_2_7_13_2
  article-title: Correlation of immunohistochemical staining patterns of p53 with mutational analysis in ovarian carcinomas
  publication-title: Mod Pathol
– ident: e_1_2_7_11_2
  doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001101)89:9<2006::AID-CNCR18>3.0.CO;2-7
– ident: e_1_2_7_22_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2008.01.003
– ident: e_1_2_7_20_2
  doi: 10.1093/jnci/djg036
– ident: e_1_2_7_18_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01039.x
– ident: e_1_2_7_10_2
  doi: 10.1097/00004347-200404000-00007
– ident: e_1_2_7_16_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.08.034
– ident: e_1_2_7_3_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2009.01.004
– ident: e_1_2_7_5_2
  doi: 10.3322/caac.20006
– ident: e_1_2_7_19_2
  doi: 10.1002/path.2696
– ident: e_1_2_7_9_2
  doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-03-0751
– ident: e_1_2_7_21_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.04.017
– ident: e_1_2_7_8_2
  doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010901)92:5<1177::AID-CNCR1436>3.0.CO;2-5
– ident: e_1_2_7_28_2
  doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a001016
– ident: e_1_2_7_2_2
  doi: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e318199009c
– ident: e_1_2_7_30_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.029
– ident: e_1_2_7_31_2
  doi: 10.1002/path.2659
– ident: e_1_2_7_12_2
  doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000146025.91953.8d
– ident: e_1_2_7_27_2
  doi: 10.1002/path.1913
– ident: e_1_2_7_4_2
  doi: 10.1097/PGP.0b013e3181c042b6
– ident: e_1_2_7_17_2
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050232
– ident: e_1_2_7_26_2
  doi: 10.1017/S146239940800077X
– ident: e_1_2_7_6_2
  doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605112
SSID ssj0009955
Score 2.382756
Snippet Studies on the p53 expression and outcome for women with ovarian carcinoma have produced conflicting results. The observed heterogeneity may be due to the...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
wiley
istex
fao
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 191
SubjectTerms Adult
Age
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antibodies
Biological and medical sciences
Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism
carcinoma
Cell survival
Clear cells
Clinical trials
Combined Modality Therapy
Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous - genetics
Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous - metabolism
Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous - pathology
Cystadenocarcinoma, Serous - therapy
Epidemiologic Methods
Female
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Multivariate analysis
Mutation
Neoplasm Staging
Neoplasm, Residual
Nuclei
Ovarian carcinoma
Ovarian Neoplasms - genetics
Ovarian Neoplasms - metabolism
Ovarian Neoplasms - pathology
Ovarian Neoplasms - therapy
p53
p53 protein
Pathology. Cytology. Biochemistry. Spectrometry. Miscellaneous investigative techniques
pelvic
Pelvis
Prognosis
Regression analysis
serous
Surgery
TP53
Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 - metabolism
Tumors
Young Adult
Title biological and clinical value of p53 expression in pelvic high-grade serous carcinomas
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-HSC6Q451-W/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fpath.2744
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20629008
https://www.proquest.com/docview/754021107
https://www.proquest.com/docview/907167709
Volume 222
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBZpDqWXtukrbpsgSim9eGPradNTSJouhYS2yZIcAkKypRASvMs-IPTUn9Df2F-SGb-WLQmU3ow1Mmg0M_pkjb4h5H3hVanzVMQ-kS4WRebiLFgdS6-VcjaVweHd4cMjNRyJr2fybI186u7CNPwQ_Q839Iw6XqODWzfbWZKGYsXeAfLbQfxNuULe_P0fS-qoPJeyZwoXqe5YhRK20_dcWYseBDsGhIrKvcEMSTsDJYWmusVd8HMVzdbL0cETct4NpMlCuRos5m5Q_PyL4_E_R_qUPG5hKt1t7GqDrPnqGXl42B7EPyfnYF60IXDCWaa2Kml3yZIigbin40AnklN_06baVvSyohN_DaGJIknyn1-_L6a29BScYLyY0QKrGlWYrvSCjA4-n-wN47ZQQ1wA3hKxQ5q_jCtZJp4leSi15haULjVs5orgmXDMBecA_QQetMstvArWey5gBQ2KvyTr1bjym4RagBOKs8BLxkXmC6tsiZzxSiXBJ1pF5GM3ZaZoWcyxmMa1afiXmUFtGdRWRN71opOGuuMuoU2Yd2MvIKSa0THDg9w0g6DGoOlDbQx9Zzu9wjQ4Lc3p0RczPN5T34VMzWlEtlespe_AEJwBYooI7czHgPfikYytPKjWYHO9Bb9fJAcQqLRO8oi8aixv-f1EsRxAHCiltp_7h2m-7Z4M8eH1v4u-IY_qVIk6c_EtWZ9PF34LENjcbdeudgs-oir9
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELbaIgEX3tDwKBZCiEu2ieNHInGpCmWB7grortpDkWUndoVaZVfbXanixE_gN_JLmMlrtaiVELcoGUfyeGb82R5_Q8jL3MlCZTEPXSRsyPPUhqk3KhROSWlNLLzFu8ODoeyP-ccjcbRG3rR3YWp-iG7DDT2jitfo4Lghvb1kDcWSvT0kuFsn1zgADVx6vf26JI_KMiE6rnAeq5ZXKGLbXdOV2WjdmwlgVFTvBeZImnNQk6_rW1wGQFfxbDUh7d0m39qu1Hkop73F3PbyH3-xPP5vX--QWw1SpTu1ad0la668R64PmrP4--QYLIzWHE440NSUBW3vWVLkEHd04ulUJNRdNNm2Jf1e0qk7g-hEkSf5989fJzNTOAp-MFmc0xwLG5WYsfSAjPfejXb7YVOrIcwBcvHQItNfmkhRRI5FmS-USgxoXShYz-XeMW6Z9dYCAPKJVzYz8Mob5xIOk6iXyUOyUU5Kt0moAUQhE-aTgiU8dbmRpkDaeCkj7yIlA_K6HTOdN0TmWE_jTNcUzEyjtjRqKyAvOtFpzd5xmdAmDLw2JxBV9fiA4VlunEJcY_DpVWUNXWMzO8VMOCX04fC97h_syi9cxPowIFsr5tI1YIjPADQFhLb2o8GB8VTGlA5Uq_FztQq_WiQDHCiVirKAPKpNb_n_SLIMcBwopTKgq7upP--M-vjw-N9Fn5Mb_dFgX-9_GH56Qm5WmRNVIuNTsjGfLdwzAGRzu1X53R_gMy8c
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1La9wwEBZJCqGXps_EaZuKUkov3tiyHjY9hbTb7SNL2mRJDgEh2VIoCd5lswuhp_6E_sb-ks74tWxJoPRmrJFBo5nRJ2v0DSGvcicLlcU8dJGwIc9TG6beqFA4JaU1sfAW7w4fDOVgxD-ditMV8ra9C1PzQ3Q_3NAzqniNDj4p_O6CNBQr9vaQ326V3OESkAQiom8L7qgsE6KjCuexammFIrbbdV1ajFa9GQNERe1eY4qkuQIt-bq8xU34cxnOVutRf4OctSOp01AuevOZ7eU__iJ5_M-h3if3GpxK92rDekBWXPmQrB80J_GPyBnYF60ZnHCaqSkL2t6ypMgg7ujY04lIqLtucm1L-r2kE3cJsYkiS_Lvn7_Op6ZwFLxgPL-iOZY1KjFf6TEZ9d8f7w_CplJDmAPg4qFFnr80kaKIHIsyXyiVGFC6ULCby71j3DLrrQX44xOvbGbglTfOJRyWUC-TJ2StHJdui1ADeEImzCcFS3jqciNNgaTxUkbeRUoG5E07ZTpvaMyxmsalrgmYmUZtadRWQF52opOau-MmoS2Yd23OIabq0RHDk9w4hajGoOl1ZQxdZzO9wDw4JfTJ8IMeHO3Lr1zE-iQgO0vW0nVgiM4AMgWEtuajwX3xTMaUDlSrsbnag98ukgEKlEpFWUA2a8tbfD-SLAMUB0qp7Of2YerDveMBPmz_u-gLsn74rq-_fBx-fkruVmkTVRbjM7I2m87dc0BjM7tTed0fL_otyw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=biological+and+clinical+value+of+p53+expression+in+pelvic+high-grade+serous+carcinomas&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+pathology&rft.au=K%C3%B6bel%2C+Martin&rft.au=Reuss%2C+Alexander&rft.au=Bois%2C+Andreas+du&rft.au=Kommoss%2C+Stefan&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.pub=John+Wiley+%26+Sons%2C+Ltd&rft.issn=0022-3417&rft.volume=222&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=198&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fpath.2744&rft.externalDocID=US201301888024
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0022-3417&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0022-3417&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0022-3417&client=summon