Non-Invasive Monitoring of Intracranial Pressure Pulse Waves from Closed Eyelids in Patients with Normal-Tension Glaucoma

• Published in: Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Vol. 61; no. 4; p. 566
• Main Authors: Bartusis, Laimonas, Krakauskaite, Solventa, Kevalaite, Ugne, Judickaite, Austeja, Zizas, Arminas, Stoskuviene, Akvile, Chaleckas, Edvinas, Deimantavicius, Mantas, Hamarat, Yasin, Scalzo, Fabien, Berskiene, Kristina, Januleviciene, Ingrida, Ragauskas, Arminas
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 22.03.2025; MDPI
• Subjects: Aged; Care and treatment; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Glaucoma; glaucoma screening; Humans; Intracranial pressure; Intracranial Pressure - physiology; intracranial pressure pulse waves; Intraocular Pressure - physiology; Iris; Low Tension Glaucoma - diagnosis; Low Tension Glaucoma - physiopathology; Male; Medical research; Medicine, Experimental; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation; Monitoring, Physiologic - methods; non-invasive monitoring; normal-tension glaucoma; Optic nerve; Pulse Wave Analysis - instrumentation; Pulse Wave Analysis - methods; Sensors; Statistical analysis; Lithuania; United Kingdom; United States > US; intracranial pressure pulse waves; normal-tension glaucoma; non-invasive monitoring; glaucoma screening
• ISSN: 1648-9144; 1010-660X; 1648-9144
• DOI: 10.3390/medicina61040566

Background and Objectives: Normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) is a subtype of primary open-angle glaucoma characterized by progressive optic nerve damage despite intraocular pressure (IOP) remaining within the normal range. The underlying pathophysiology of NTG remains incompletely understood, and its diagnosis is often delayed due to the lack of a definitive screening tool. This study aimed to evaluate differences in intracranial pressure pulse wave amplitude recorded from closed eyelids between NTG patients and control subjects using a novel non-invasive monitoring technology. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted, enrolling NTG patients and age-matched controls. Intracranial pressure pulse wave signals were recorded from closed eyelids using the ’Archimedes’ 02 device, which employs a highly sensitive digital pressure sensor and hydromechanical coupling for signal transmission. The amplitude of recorded intracranial pressure pulse waves was analyzed and compared between groups. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 30.0, with significance set at p < 0.05. Results: A total of 140 participants were enrolled, including 68 NTG patients and 72 controls. After applying exclusion criteria, 63 NTG patients and 68 controls were included in the final analysis. The median intracranial pressure pulse wave amplitude was significantly higher in NTG patients (0.1326 a.u.) than in controls (0.0889 a.u.), with p = 0.01. Conclusions: These findings suggest that intracranial pressure pulse wave monitoring may serve as a potential biomarker for NTG. Further studies are needed to determine the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of this technology for NTG detection.