Improving communication of cancer survival statistics—feasibility of implementing model-based algorithms in routine publications

Background Routine reporting of cancer patient survival is important, both to monitor the effectiveness of health care and to inform about prognosis following a cancer diagnosis. A range of different survival measures exist, each serving different purposes and targeting different audiences. It is im...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of cancer Vol. 129; no. 5; pp. 819 - 828
Main Authors Myklebust, Tor Åge, Aagnes, Bjarte, Nilssen, Yngvar, Rutherford, Mark, Lambert, Paul C., Andersson, Therese M. L., Johansson, Anna L. V., Dickman, Paul W., Møller, Bjørn
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 21.09.2023
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0007-0920
1532-1827
1532-1827
DOI10.1038/s41416-023-02360-5

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background Routine reporting of cancer patient survival is important, both to monitor the effectiveness of health care and to inform about prognosis following a cancer diagnosis. A range of different survival measures exist, each serving different purposes and targeting different audiences. It is important that routine publications expand on current practice and provide estimates on a wider range of survival measures. We examine the feasibility of automated production of such statistics. Methods We used data on 23 cancer sites obtained from the Cancer Registry of Norway (CRN). We propose an automated way of estimating flexible parametric relative survival models and calculating estimates of net survival, crude probabilities, and loss in life expectancy across many cancer sites and subgroups of patients. Results For 21 of 23 cancer sites, we were able to estimate survival models without assuming proportional hazards. Reliable estimates of all desired measures were obtained for all cancer sites. Discussion It may be challenging to implement new survival measures in routine publications as it can require the application of modeling techniques. We propose a way of automating the production of such statistics and show that we can obtain reliable estimates across a range of measures and subgroups of patients.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-0920
1532-1827
1532-1827
DOI:10.1038/s41416-023-02360-5