Comparative analysis of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms for random and correlated instances of multiobjective d-dimensional knapsack problems
This study analyzes multiobjective d-dimensional knapsack problems (MOd-KP) within a comparative analysis of three multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs): the ε-nondominated sorted genetic algorithm II ( ε-NSGAII), the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm 2 (SPEA2) and the ε-nondominated h...
Saved in:
| Published in | European journal of operational research Vol. 211; no. 3; pp. 466 - 479 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Amsterdam
Elsevier B.V
16.06.2011
Elsevier Elsevier Sequoia S.A |
| Series | European Journal of Operational Research |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 0377-2217 1872-6860 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.01.030 |
Cover
| Summary: | This study analyzes multiobjective d-dimensional knapsack problems (MOd-KP) within a comparative analysis of three multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs): the
ε-nondominated sorted genetic algorithm II (
ε-NSGAII), the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm 2 (SPEA2) and the
ε-nondominated hierarchical Bayesian optimization algorithm (
ε-hBOA). This study contributes new insights into the challenges posed by correlated instances of the MOd-KP that better capture the decision interdependencies often present in real world applications. A statistical performance analysis of the algorithms uses the unary
ε-indicator, the hypervolume indicator and success rate plots to demonstrate their relative effectiveness, efficiency, and reliability for the MOd-KP instances analyzed. Our results indicate that the
ε-hBOA achieves superior performance relative to
ε-NSGAII and SPEA2 with increasing number of objectives, number of decisions, and correlative linkages between the two. Performance of the
ε-hBOA suggests that probabilistic model building evolutionary algorithms have significant promise for expanding the size and scope of challenging multiobjective problems that can be explored. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 0377-2217 1872-6860 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.ejor.2011.01.030 |