Sex differences in large conducting airway anatomy
Airway luminal area is the major determinant of resistance to airflow in the tracheobronchial tree. Women may have smaller central conducting airways than men; however, previous evidence is confounded by an indirect assessment of airway geometry and by subjects with prior smoking history. The purpos...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of applied physiology (1985) Vol. 125; no. 3; pp. 960 - 965 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Physiological Society
01.09.2018
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 8750-7587 1522-1601 1522-1601 |
DOI | 10.1152/japplphysiol.00440.2018 |
Cover
Abstract | Airway luminal area is the major determinant of resistance to airflow in the tracheobronchial tree. Women may have smaller central conducting airways than men; however, previous evidence is confounded by an indirect assessment of airway geometry and by subjects with prior smoking history. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of sex on airway size in healthy nonsmokers. Using low-dose high-resolution computed tomography, we retrospectively assessed airway luminal area in healthy men ( n = 51) and women ( n = 73) of varying ages (19–86 yr). Subjects with a positive smoking history, cardiopulmonary disease, or a body mass index > 40 kg/m
2
were excluded. Luminal areas of the trachea, right and left main bronchus, bronchus intermediate, left and right upper lobes, and the left lower lobe were analyzed at three discrete points. The luminal areas of the conducting airways were ~26%–35% smaller in women. The trachea had the largest differences in luminal area between men and women (298 ± 47 vs. 195 ± 28 mm
2
or 35% smaller for men and women, respectively), whereas the left lower lobe had the smallest differences (57 ± 15 vs. 42 ± 9 mm
2
or 26% smaller for men and women, respectively). When a subset of subjects was matched for height, the sex differences in airway luminal area persisted, with women being ~20%–30% smaller. With all subjects, there were modest relationships between height and airway luminal area ( r = 0.73–0.53, P < 0.05). Although there was considerable overlap between sexes, the luminal areas of the large conducting airways were smaller in healthy women than in men.
NEW & NOTEWORTHY Previous evidence for sex differences in airway size has been confounded by indirect measures and/or cohorts with significant smoking histories or pathologies. We found that central airways in healthy women were significantly smaller (~26%–35%) than men. The significant sex-difference in airway size was attenuated (20%–30% smaller) but preserved in a subset of subjects matched for height. Over a range of ages, healthy women have smaller central airways than men. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Airway luminal area is the major determinant of resistance to airflow in the tracheobronchial tree. Women may have smaller central conducting airways than men; however, previous evidence is confounded by an indirect assessment of airway geometry and by subjects with prior smoking history. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of sex on airway size in healthy nonsmokers. Using low-dose high-resolution computed tomography, we retrospectively assessed airway luminal area in healthy men (n = 51) and women (n = 73) of varying ages (19–86 yr). Subjects with a positive smoking history, cardiopulmonary disease, or a body mass index > 40 kg/m2 were excluded. Luminal areas of the trachea, right and left main bronchus, bronchus intermediate, left and right upper lobes, and the left lower lobe were analyzed at three discrete points. The luminal areas of the conducting airways were ~26%–35% smaller in women. The trachea had the largest differences in luminal area between men and women (298 ± 47 vs. 195 ± 28 mm2 or 35% smaller for men and women, respectively), whereas the left lower lobe had the smallest differences (57 ± 15 vs. 42 ± 9 mm2 or 26% smaller for men and women, respectively). When a subset of subjects was matched for height, the sex differences in airway luminal area persisted, with women being ~20%–30% smaller. With all subjects, there were modest relationships between height and airway luminal area (r = 0.73–0.53, P < 0.05). Although there was considerable overlap between sexes, the luminal areas of the large conducting airways were smaller in healthy women than in men. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Previous evidence for sex differences in airway size has been confounded by indirect measures and/or cohorts with significant smoking histories or pathologies. We found that central airways in healthy women were significantly smaller (~26%–35%) than men. The significant sex-difference in airway size was attenuated (20%–30% smaller) but preserved in a subset of subjects matched for height. Over a range of ages, healthy women have smaller central airways than men. Airway luminal area is the major determinant of resistance to airflow in the tracheobronchial tree. Women may have smaller central conducting airways than men; however, previous evidence is confounded by an indirect assessment of airway geometry and by subjects with prior smoking history. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of sex on airway size in healthy nonsmokers. Using low-dose high-resolution computed tomography, we retrospectively assessed airway luminal area in healthy men ( n = 51) and women ( n = 73) of varying ages (19–86 yr). Subjects with a positive smoking history, cardiopulmonary disease, or a body mass index > 40 kg/m 2 were excluded. Luminal areas of the trachea, right and left main bronchus, bronchus intermediate, left and right upper lobes, and the left lower lobe were analyzed at three discrete points. The luminal areas of the conducting airways were ~26%–35% smaller in women. The trachea had the largest differences in luminal area between men and women (298 ± 47 vs. 195 ± 28 mm 2 or 35% smaller for men and women, respectively), whereas the left lower lobe had the smallest differences (57 ± 15 vs. 42 ± 9 mm 2 or 26% smaller for men and women, respectively). When a subset of subjects was matched for height, the sex differences in airway luminal area persisted, with women being ~20%–30% smaller. With all subjects, there were modest relationships between height and airway luminal area ( r = 0.73–0.53, P < 0.05). Although there was considerable overlap between sexes, the luminal areas of the large conducting airways were smaller in healthy women than in men. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Previous evidence for sex differences in airway size has been confounded by indirect measures and/or cohorts with significant smoking histories or pathologies. We found that central airways in healthy women were significantly smaller (~26%–35%) than men. The significant sex-difference in airway size was attenuated (20%–30% smaller) but preserved in a subset of subjects matched for height. Over a range of ages, healthy women have smaller central airways than men. Airway luminal area is the major determinant of resistance to airflow in the tracheobronchial tree. Women may have smaller central conducting airways than men; however, previous evidence is confounded by an indirect assessment of airway geometry and by subjects with prior smoking history. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of sex on airway size in healthy nonsmokers. Using low-dose high-resolution computed tomography, we retrospectively assessed airway luminal area in healthy men ( n = 51) and women ( n = 73) of varying ages (19-86 yr). Subjects with a positive smoking history, cardiopulmonary disease, or a body mass index > 40 kg/m were excluded. Luminal areas of the trachea, right and left main bronchus, bronchus intermediate, left and right upper lobes, and the left lower lobe were analyzed at three discrete points. The luminal areas of the conducting airways were ~26%-35% smaller in women. The trachea had the largest differences in luminal area between men and women (298 ± 47 vs. 195 ± 28 mm or 35% smaller for men and women, respectively), whereas the left lower lobe had the smallest differences (57 ± 15 vs. 42 ± 9 mm or 26% smaller for men and women, respectively). When a subset of subjects was matched for height, the sex differences in airway luminal area persisted, with women being ~20%-30% smaller. With all subjects, there were modest relationships between height and airway luminal area ( r = 0.73-0.53, P < 0.05). Although there was considerable overlap between sexes, the luminal areas of the large conducting airways were smaller in healthy women than in men. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Previous evidence for sex differences in airway size has been confounded by indirect measures and/or cohorts with significant smoking histories or pathologies. We found that central airways in healthy women were significantly smaller (~26%-35%) than men. The significant sex-difference in airway size was attenuated (20%-30% smaller) but preserved in a subset of subjects matched for height. Over a range of ages, healthy women have smaller central airways than men. Airway luminal area is the major determinant of resistance to airflow in the tracheobronchial tree. Women may have smaller central conducting airways than men; however, previous evidence is confounded by an indirect assessment of airway geometry and by subjects with prior smoking history. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of sex on airway size in healthy nonsmokers. Using low-dose high-resolution computed tomography, we retrospectively assessed airway luminal area in healthy men ( n = 51) and women ( n = 73) of varying ages (19-86 yr). Subjects with a positive smoking history, cardiopulmonary disease, or a body mass index > 40 kg/m2 were excluded. Luminal areas of the trachea, right and left main bronchus, bronchus intermediate, left and right upper lobes, and the left lower lobe were analyzed at three discrete points. The luminal areas of the conducting airways were ~26%-35% smaller in women. The trachea had the largest differences in luminal area between men and women (298 ± 47 vs. 195 ± 28 mm2 or 35% smaller for men and women, respectively), whereas the left lower lobe had the smallest differences (57 ± 15 vs. 42 ± 9 mm2 or 26% smaller for men and women, respectively). When a subset of subjects was matched for height, the sex differences in airway luminal area persisted, with women being ~20%-30% smaller. With all subjects, there were modest relationships between height and airway luminal area ( r = 0.73-0.53, P < 0.05). Although there was considerable overlap between sexes, the luminal areas of the large conducting airways were smaller in healthy women than in men. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Previous evidence for sex differences in airway size has been confounded by indirect measures and/or cohorts with significant smoking histories or pathologies. We found that central airways in healthy women were significantly smaller (~26%-35%) than men. The significant sex-difference in airway size was attenuated (20%-30% smaller) but preserved in a subset of subjects matched for height. Over a range of ages, healthy women have smaller central airways than men.Airway luminal area is the major determinant of resistance to airflow in the tracheobronchial tree. Women may have smaller central conducting airways than men; however, previous evidence is confounded by an indirect assessment of airway geometry and by subjects with prior smoking history. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of sex on airway size in healthy nonsmokers. Using low-dose high-resolution computed tomography, we retrospectively assessed airway luminal area in healthy men ( n = 51) and women ( n = 73) of varying ages (19-86 yr). Subjects with a positive smoking history, cardiopulmonary disease, or a body mass index > 40 kg/m2 were excluded. Luminal areas of the trachea, right and left main bronchus, bronchus intermediate, left and right upper lobes, and the left lower lobe were analyzed at three discrete points. The luminal areas of the conducting airways were ~26%-35% smaller in women. The trachea had the largest differences in luminal area between men and women (298 ± 47 vs. 195 ± 28 mm2 or 35% smaller for men and women, respectively), whereas the left lower lobe had the smallest differences (57 ± 15 vs. 42 ± 9 mm2 or 26% smaller for men and women, respectively). When a subset of subjects was matched for height, the sex differences in airway luminal area persisted, with women being ~20%-30% smaller. With all subjects, there were modest relationships between height and airway luminal area ( r = 0.73-0.53, P < 0.05). Although there was considerable overlap between sexes, the luminal areas of the large conducting airways were smaller in healthy women than in men. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Previous evidence for sex differences in airway size has been confounded by indirect measures and/or cohorts with significant smoking histories or pathologies. We found that central airways in healthy women were significantly smaller (~26%-35%) than men. The significant sex-difference in airway size was attenuated (20%-30% smaller) but preserved in a subset of subjects matched for height. Over a range of ages, healthy women have smaller central airways than men. |
Author | Welch, Brian T. Ripoll, Juan G. Dominelli, Paolo B. Wiggins, Chad C. Joyner, Michael J. Cross, Troy J. Baker, Sarah E. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Paolo B. orcidid: 0000-0001-5575-4043 surname: Dominelli fullname: Dominelli, Paolo B. organization: Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota – sequence: 2 givenname: Juan G. surname: Ripoll fullname: Ripoll, Juan G. organization: Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota – sequence: 3 givenname: Troy J. surname: Cross fullname: Cross, Troy J. organization: Department of Cardiovascular Disease, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia – sequence: 4 givenname: Sarah E. surname: Baker fullname: Baker, Sarah E. organization: Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota – sequence: 5 givenname: Chad C. surname: Wiggins fullname: Wiggins, Chad C. organization: Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota – sequence: 6 givenname: Brian T. surname: Welch fullname: Welch, Brian T. organization: Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota – sequence: 7 givenname: Michael J. surname: Joyner fullname: Joyner, Michael J. organization: Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30024341$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkc1v1DAQxS1URLeFfwEiceGSZcYf8eYAEqr4kipxAM7WxHG2XmXtYCeF_e_x0haVXjj5ML_3_GbeGTsJMTjGXiCsERV_vaNpGqerQ_ZxXANICWsOuHnEVmXKa2wAT9hqoxXUWm30KTvLeQeAUip8wk4FAJdC4orxr-5X1fthcMkF63LlQzVS2rrKxtAvdvZhW5FPP-lQUaA57g9P2eOBxuye3b7n7PuH998uPtWXXz5-vnh3WVuFONe660j0jSWkliRBa6Fks6oT0AnbIEjVYw-yIcdbIawmKawa7CC4loO04py9vfGdlm7veuvCnGg0U_J7SgcTyZt_J8FfmW28No0QClpZDF7dGqT4Y3F5NnufrRtHCi4u2XDQHDeqHKWgLx-gu7ikUNYzHDm00EjdFOr5_UR_o9ydswBvbgCbYs7JDcb6mWYfjwH9aBDMsT5zvz7zpz5zrK_o9QP93Rf_U_4GyiikOA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00144_2020 crossref_primary_10_3390_life12122003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaerosci_2020_105541 crossref_primary_10_1249_MSS_0000000000002938 crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00803_2019 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnut_2022_961950 crossref_primary_10_1113_EP088370 crossref_primary_10_1097_MEJ_0000000000001195 crossref_primary_10_1113_EP090176 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00421_019_04282_8 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_67664_5 crossref_primary_10_14814_phy2_14657 crossref_primary_10_3389_fspor_2022_903992 crossref_primary_10_1002_oby_23305 crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00418_2021 crossref_primary_10_1080_00140139_2022_2157494 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cophys_2019_04_023 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mtbio_2021_100182 crossref_primary_10_1111_anae_15041 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph19094946 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_trac_2025_118187 crossref_primary_10_1002_ajpa_23829 crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00573_2024 crossref_primary_10_1111_crj_13462 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2024_170004 crossref_primary_10_1093_ckj_sfac083 crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00898_2023 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejps_2024_106724 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics14090903 crossref_primary_10_1249_JES_0000000000000188 crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00282_2023 crossref_primary_10_1002_ase_2211 crossref_primary_10_1113_EP091830 crossref_primary_10_1097_HP_0000000000001468 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu11020329 crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm14020209 crossref_primary_10_1113_EP088548 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_fluid_031424_103721 crossref_primary_10_1249_JSR_0000000000001149 crossref_primary_10_1080_15412555_2024_2394129 crossref_primary_10_1139_apnm_2023_0246 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cophys_2019_05_012 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcdd12030085 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_trac_2024_118114 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00421_021_04690_9 crossref_primary_10_1002_ansa_202200039 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_22005_6 crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00347_2020 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rmed_2023_107278 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12931_021_01656_5 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2022_984469 crossref_primary_10_33571_rpolitec_v19n37a10 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jconrel_2022_08_021 crossref_primary_10_1513_AnnalsATS_202207_578OC crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjms_2020_04_023 crossref_primary_10_3389_fbioe_2022_1081465 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00421_018_4042_5 crossref_primary_10_1113_EP090309 crossref_primary_10_1249_MSS_0000000000003255 crossref_primary_10_14814_phy2_70190 crossref_primary_10_1088_2057_1976_adbbf4 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcvm_2025_1473910 crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2024_1392489 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00421_021_04778_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apergo_2022_103710 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cophys_2023_100652 crossref_primary_10_1080_17425247_2024_2392790 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rmed_2020_106071 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mayocp_2020_06_063 crossref_primary_10_1115_1_4047550 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40279_023_01954_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaerosci_2024_106471 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms26062747 crossref_primary_10_1044_2021_JSLHR_21_00308 crossref_primary_10_1113_EP087956 crossref_primary_10_1152_ajplung_00122_2024 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2022_154907 crossref_primary_10_1183_16000617_0121_2024 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12931_019_1047_5 crossref_primary_10_15366_rimcafd2021_84_009 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2023_1186646 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40279_023_01914_0 crossref_primary_10_1183_16000617_0074_2021 |
Cites_doi | 10.1038/nrdp.2015.76 10.1152/ajpregu.00183.2010 10.1164/ajrccm/146.2.335 10.1164/arrd.1986.134.5.956 10.1152/japplphysiol.00008.2009 10.1016/B978-0-7020-6294-0.00027-7 10.1152/jappl.1987.63.5.2042 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318214679d 10.1164/ajrccm.160.6.9808134 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.5.1573 10.1155/2011/540396 10.1152/japplphysiol.00409.2015 10.1002/ajpa.23051 10.1007/s00330-003-1909-5 10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00556-6 10.1152/jappl.1974.37.1.67 10.1113/JP274068 10.1183/09031936.00096108 10.1152/japplphysiol.01341.2009 10.1152/japplphysiol.00562.2009 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.285965 10.1164/arrd.1980.121.2.339 10.1152/jappl.2000.89.2.721 10.1080/15412555.2016.1199666 10.1371/journal.pone.0164835 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.126466 10.1016/j.resp.2005.12.015 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.252767 10.1097/00003677-200404000-00003 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.099697 10.1016/j.acra.2010.11.005 10.1152/japplphysiol.00612.2001 10.1113/EP086566 10.1164/rccm.201503-0487OC 10.1113/EP085366 10.1164/arrd.1985.131.6.840 10.1111/apha.12234 10.1164/rccm.201608-1545OC 10.1183/09031936.00125011 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201506-371PP 10.1371/journal.pone.0090040 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.186056 10.2214/ajr.146.2.233 10.1183/09031936.00034714 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright American Physiological Society Sep 2018 Copyright © 2018 the American Physiological Society 2018 American Physiological Society |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright American Physiological Society Sep 2018 – notice: Copyright © 2018 the American Physiological Society 2018 American Physiological Society |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QP 7QR 7TK 7TS 7U7 8FD C1K FR3 P64 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1152/japplphysiol.00440.2018 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Physical Education Index Toxicology Abstracts Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Technology Research Database Toxicology Abstracts Chemoreception Abstracts Engineering Research Database Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Physical Education Index Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef MEDLINE Technology Research Database MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Anatomy & Physiology |
DocumentTitleAlternate | SMALLER AIRWAYS IN HEALTHY WOMEN |
EISSN | 1522-1601 |
EndPage | 965 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC6335094 30024341 10_1152_japplphysiol_00440_2018 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NHLBI NIH HHS grantid: R35 HL139854 – fundername: NHLBI NIH HHS grantid: F32 HL131151 – fundername: NIDDK NIH HHS grantid: T32 DK007352 – fundername: ; ; grantid: R35-HL139854 |
GroupedDBID | --- -~X .55 18M 29J 2WC 4.4 53G 5VS 85S AAFWJ AAYXX ABCQX ABDNZ ABHWK ABJNI ABKWE ABOCM ACBEA ACGFO ACGFS ACIWK ACPRK ACYGS ADBBV ADFNX AENEX AFRAH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BAWUL BKKCC BTFSW CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EJD EMOBN F5P FRP GX1 H13 H~9 ITBOX KQ8 L7B OK1 P2P P6G PQQKQ RAP RHI RPL RPRKH SJN TR2 UHB UKR UPT W8F WH7 WOQ X7M XSW YBH YQT YWH ~02 AEILP AFOSN CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QP 7QR 7TK 7TS 7U7 8FD C1K FR3 P64 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c511t-7bba3d6ca1a9a4a09c0152c5b30b3c61045d1d046ae2933c7a43c5fcf3274f4c3 |
ISSN | 8750-7587 1522-1601 |
IngestDate | Tue Sep 30 16:34:55 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 04 23:36:36 EDT 2025 Mon Jun 30 08:33:48 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:05:08 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 03:54:56 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:03:29 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Keywords | exercise work of breathing dysanapsis |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c511t-7bba3d6ca1a9a4a09c0152c5b30b3c61045d1d046ae2933c7a43c5fcf3274f4c3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-5575-4043 |
OpenAccessLink | https://journals.physiology.org/doi/pdf/10.1152/japplphysiol.00440.2018 |
PMID | 30024341 |
PQID | 2120906476 |
PQPubID | 40905 |
PageCount | 6 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6335094 proquest_miscellaneous_2072185144 proquest_journals_2120906476 pubmed_primary_30024341 crossref_citationtrail_10_1152_japplphysiol_00440_2018 crossref_primary_10_1152_japplphysiol_00440_2018 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2018-09-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2018-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2018 text: 2018-09-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Bethesda – name: Bethesda, MD |
PublicationTitle | Journal of applied physiology (1985) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Appl Physiol (1985) |
PublicationYear | 2018 |
Publisher | American Physiological Society |
Publisher_xml | – name: American Physiological Society |
References | B20 B42 B21 B43 B22 B23 B45 B24 B25 B26 B27 B28 B29 B30 B31 B10 B32 B11 B33 B12 B34 B13 B35 B14 B36 B15 B37 B16 B38 B17 B39 B18 B19 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 West JB (B44) 2008 B40 B41 |
References_xml | – ident: B4 doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.76 – ident: B1 doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00183.2010 – ident: B5 doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/146.2.335 – ident: B25 doi: 10.1164/arrd.1986.134.5.956 – volume-title: Respiratory Physiology- The Essentials year: 2008 ident: B44 – ident: B31 doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00008.2009 – ident: B32 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-7020-6294-0.00027-7 – ident: B34 doi: 10.1152/jappl.1987.63.5.2042 – ident: B12 doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318214679d – ident: B36 doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.6.9808134 – ident: B24 doi: 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.5.1573 – ident: B43 doi: 10.1155/2011/540396 – ident: B13 doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00409.2015 – ident: B17 doi: 10.1002/ajpa.23051 – ident: B16 doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-1909-5 – ident: B33 doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00556-6 – ident: B18 doi: 10.1152/jappl.1974.37.1.67 – ident: B14 doi: 10.1113/JP274068 – ident: B7 doi: 10.1183/09031936.00096108 – ident: B22 doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01341.2009 – ident: B40 doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00562.2009 – ident: B15 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.285965 – ident: B35 doi: 10.1164/arrd.1980.121.2.339 – ident: B26 doi: 10.1152/jappl.2000.89.2.721 – ident: B30 doi: 10.1080/15412555.2016.1199666 – ident: B41 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164835 – ident: B23 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.126466 – ident: B8 doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2005.12.015 – ident: B11 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.252767 – ident: B27 doi: 10.1097/00003677-200404000-00003 – ident: B38 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.099697 – ident: B45 doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.11.005 – ident: B3 doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00612.2001 – ident: B10 doi: 10.1113/EP086566 – ident: B42 doi: 10.1164/rccm.201503-0487OC – ident: B39 doi: 10.1113/EP085366 – ident: B20 doi: 10.1164/arrd.1985.131.6.840 – ident: B28 doi: 10.1111/apha.12234 – ident: B2 doi: 10.1164/rccm.201608-1545OC – ident: B6 doi: 10.1183/09031936.00125011 – ident: B9 doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201506-371PP – ident: B29 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090040 – ident: B37 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.186056 – ident: B19 doi: 10.2214/ajr.146.2.233 – ident: B21 doi: 10.1183/09031936.00034714 |
SSID | ssj0014451 |
Score | 2.5734704 |
Snippet | Airway luminal area is the major determinant of resistance to airflow in the tracheobronchial tree. Women may have smaller central conducting airways than men;... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 960 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Air flow Airway management Body Height Body mass index Body size Bronchi - anatomy & histology Bronchus Computed tomography Female Gender aspects Gender differences Geometry Healthy Volunteers Humans Lung - anatomy & histology Male Men Middle Aged Respiratory Function Tests Respiratory System - anatomy & histology Respiratory System - diagnostic imaging Respiratory tract Retrospective Studies Set theory Sex Sex Characteristics Sex differences Size Smoking Tomography Tomography, X-Ray Computed Trachea Trachea - anatomy & histology Young Adult |
Title | Sex differences in large conducting airway anatomy |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30024341 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2120906476 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2072185144 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6335094 |
Volume | 125 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAFT databaseName: Open Access Digital Library customDbUrl: eissn: 1522-1601 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0014451 issn: 8750-7587 databaseCode: KQ8 dateStart: 19961001 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries – providerCode: PRVBFR databaseName: Free Medical Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1522-1601 dateEnd: 20241001 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0014451 issn: 8750-7587 databaseCode: DIK dateStart: 19980101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.freemedicaljournals.com providerName: Flying Publisher – providerCode: PRVFQY databaseName: GFMER Free Medical Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1522-1601 dateEnd: 20241001 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0014451 issn: 8750-7587 databaseCode: GX1 dateStart: 19970101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.gfmer.ch/Medical_journals/Free_medical.php providerName: Geneva Foundation for Medical Education and Research |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db5RAEN-cNTG-GG39QKvBxPTFUIH9AB5rbdNoW6Nyyb2RZYGUpOXOk4vWP8C_25nd5eOs3y_kDhYWZmZnZ3Z_M0PIMyFYzEuWezEvIo_lIochxRKPVkUCUwr8L3Fp4ORUHE3Z6xmfTSbfRqilVZvvqq8_jSv5H67COeArRsn-A2f7h8IJ-A38hSNwGI5_xeMP5Ze-wolBVj0_R2Q3Yskxj6sOQKyXnyUmWQLv-mJtD3dki0pri-p1DpOVCRM4JTEfrRS8ml_UCIqpjeUJzYaSze_rxdzCZVagMfqCXftdVfZ0Ob8ctqBeSgvm0AvSNhrCrj0EcQ-uakdwf1TW3dtpwbJ400GTgU_ke-CYmJm1tJoWvOBA2Kd1qtgEQVuZoyPFmpiqA1cVPg91oQEgkyXRrq6ijaC9eJjjun3907fZ4fT4OEsPZunO4qOH1cdwl96WYrlGroeREFgJ4827YTcKk7iZdWLzGRYnCH2_-EXP61bOFdflRwTuyKRJb5Nblv_unhGsO2RSNptka89Iirvj9vS-3CQ3TiwIY4uEIHbuSOzcunG12LmD2LlG7FwrdnfJ9PAg3T_ybOkNT4EF3npRnktaCCUDmUgm_USB2RgqnlM_pwpMbsaLoPCZkCXYi1RFklHFK1XRMGIVU_Qe2WjmTfmAuIzmPi9Cv_DjirEyipWKmF8VBdi2XCnqENGRKlM2Lz2WRznPtH_Kw2xM40zTOEMaO8Tvb1yY1Cx_vmW740Vmx_GnLMTwcYy5Fg552l8GLYtbZ7Ip5ytog2kEwTlhzCH3Dev6PqnO6skCh0RrTO0bYAb39StNfaYzuQtKMYHlw9-_1iNycxh822SjXa7Kx2AKt_kTLaffARd9uFM |
linkProvider | Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex+differences+in+large+conducting+airway+anatomy&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+applied+physiology+%281985%29&rft.au=Dominelli%2C+Paolo+B&rft.au=Ripoll%2C+Juan+G&rft.au=Cross%2C+Troy+J&rft.au=Baker%2C+Sarah+E&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.pub=American+Physiological+Society&rft.issn=8750-7587&rft.eissn=1522-1601&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=960&rft_id=info:doi/10.1152%2Fjapplphysiol.00440.2018&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=8750-7587&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=8750-7587&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=8750-7587&client=summon |