Your evidence? Machine learning algorithms for medical diagnosis and prediction

Computer systems for medical diagnosis based on machine learning are not mere science fiction. Despite undisputed potential benefits, such systems may also raise problems. Two (interconnected) issues are particularly significant from an ethical point of view: The first issue is that epistemic opacit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHuman brain mapping Vol. 41; no. 6; pp. 1435 - 1444
Main Authors Heinrichs, Bert, Eickhoff, Simon B.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 15.04.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1065-9471
1097-0193
1097-0193
DOI10.1002/hbm.24886

Cover

More Information
Summary:Computer systems for medical diagnosis based on machine learning are not mere science fiction. Despite undisputed potential benefits, such systems may also raise problems. Two (interconnected) issues are particularly significant from an ethical point of view: The first issue is that epistemic opacity is at odds with a common desire for understanding and potentially undermines information rights. The second (related) issue concerns the assignment of responsibility in cases of failure. The core of the two issues seems to be that understanding and responsibility are concepts that are intrinsically tied to the discursive practice of giving and asking for reasons. The challenge is to find ways to make the outcomes of machine learning algorithms compatible with our discursive practice. This comes down to the claim that we should try to integrate discursive elements into machine learning algorithms. Under the title of “explainable AI” initiatives heading in this direction are already under way. Extensive research in this field is needed for finding adequate solutions.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1065-9471
1097-0193
1097-0193
DOI:10.1002/hbm.24886