Scaffolding mechanism of arrestin-2 in the cRaf/MEK1/ERK signaling cascade
Arrestins were initially identified for their role in homologous desensitization and internalization of G protein–coupled receptors. Receptor-bound arrestins also initiate signaling by interacting with other signaling proteins. Arrestins scaffold MAPK signaling cascades, MAPK kinase kinase (MAP3K),...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 118; no. 37; pp. 1 - 11 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
14.09.2021
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0027-8424 1091-6490 1091-6490 |
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2026491118 |
Cover
Summary: | Arrestins were initially identified for their role in homologous desensitization and internalization of G protein–coupled receptors. Receptor-bound arrestins also initiate signaling by interacting with other signaling proteins. Arrestins scaffold MAPK signaling cascades, MAPK kinase kinase (MAP3K), MAPK kinase (MAP2K), and MAPK. In particular, arrestins facilitate ERK1/2 activation by scaffolding ERK1/2 (MAPK), MEK1 (MAP2K), and Raf (MAPK3). However, the structural mechanism underlying this scaffolding remains unknown. Here, we investigated the mechanism of arrestin-2 scaffolding of cRaf, MEK1, and ERK2 using hydrogen/deuterium exchange–mass spectrometry, tryptophan-induced bimane fluorescence quenching, and NMR. We found that basal and active arrestin-2 interacted with cRaf, while only active arrestin-2 interacted with MEK1 and ERK2. The ATP binding status of MEK1 or ERK2 affected arrestin-2 binding; ATP-bound MEK1 interacted with arrestin-2, whereas only empty ERK2 bound arrestin-2. Analysis of the binding interfaces suggested that the relative positions of cRaf, MEK1, and ERK2 on arrestin-2 likely facilitate sequential phosphorylation in the signal transduction cascade. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 1C.Q., J.Y.P., and M.W.Y. contributed equally to this work. Edited by David Baker, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, and approved June 28, 2021 (received for review December 24, 2020) The authors declare no competing interest. Author contributions: J.-P.S. and K.Y.C. designed research; C.Q., J.Y.P., M.W.Y., Q.-t.H., F.Y., K.K., R.-r.L., J.-P.S., and K.Y.C. performed research; J.-P.S. and K.Y.C. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; C.Q., J.Y.P., M.W.Y., K.K., D.H., J.-P.S., and K.Y.C. analyzed data; and C.Q., J.Y.P., M.W.Y., T.M.I., V.V.G., J.-P.S., and K.Y.C. wrote the paper. |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.2026491118 |