Correcting for filter-based aerosol light absorption biases at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program's Southern Great Plains site using photoacoustic measurements and machine learning

Measurement of light absorption of solar radiation by aerosols is vital for assessing direct aerosol radiative forcing, which affects local and global climate. Low-cost and easy-to-operate filter-based instruments, such as the Particle Soot Absorption Photometer (PSAP), that collect aerosols on a fi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAtmospheric measurement techniques Vol. 15; no. 15; pp. 4569 - 4583
Main Authors Kumar, Joshin, Paik, Theo, Shetty, Nishit J., Sheridan, Patrick, Aiken, Allison C., Dubey, Manvendra K., Chakrabarty, Rajan K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Katlenburg-Lindau Copernicus GmbH 12.08.2022
Copernicus Publications
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1867-8548
1867-1381
1867-8548
DOI10.5194/amt-15-4569-2022

Cover

Abstract Measurement of light absorption of solar radiation by aerosols is vital for assessing direct aerosol radiative forcing, which affects local and global climate. Low-cost and easy-to-operate filter-based instruments, such as the Particle Soot Absorption Photometer (PSAP), that collect aerosols on a filter and measure light attenuation through the filter are widely used to infer aerosol light absorption. However, filter-based absorption measurements are subject to artifacts that are difficult to quantify. These artifacts are associated with the presence of the filter medium and the complex interactions between the filter fibers and accumulated aerosols. Various correction algorithms have been introduced to correct for the filter-based absorption coefficient measurements toward predicting the particle-phase absorption coefficient (Babs). However, the inability of these algorithms to incorporate into their formulations the complex matrix of influencing parameters such as particle asymmetry parameter, particle size, and particle penetration depth results in prediction of particle-phase absorption coefficients with relatively low accuracy. The analytical forms of corrections also suffer from a lack of universal applicability: different corrections are required for rural and urban sites across the world. In this study, we analyzed and compared 3 months of high-time-resolution ambient aerosol absorption data collected synchronously using a three-wavelength photoacoustic absorption spectrometer (PASS) and PSAP. Both instruments were operated on the same sampling inlet at the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program's Southern Great Plains (SGP) user facility in Oklahoma. We implemented the two most commonly used analytical correction algorithms, namely, Virkkula (2010) and the average of Virkkula (2010) and Ogren (2010)–Bond et al. (1999) as well as a random forest regression (RFR) machine learning algorithm to predict Babs values from the PSAP's filter-based measurements. The predicted Babs was compared against the reference Babs measured by the PASS. The RFR algorithm performed the best by yielding the lowest root mean square error of prediction. The algorithm was trained using input datasets from the PSAP (transmission and uncorrected absorption coefficient), a co-located nephelometer (scattering coefficients), and the Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (mass concentration of non-refractory aerosol particles). A revised form of the Virkkula (2010) algorithm suitable for the SGP site has been proposed; however, its performance yields approximately 2-fold errors when compared to the RFR algorithm. To generalize the accuracy and applicability of our proposed RFR algorithm, we trained and tested it on a dataset of laboratory measurements of combustion aerosols. Input variables to the algorithm included the aerosol number size distribution from the Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer, absorption coefficients from the filter-based Tricolor Absorption Photometer, and scattering coefficients from a multiwavelength nephelometer. The RFR algorithm predicted Babs values within 5 % of the reference Babs measured by the multiwavelength PASS during the laboratory experiments. Thus, we show that machine learning approaches offer a promising path to correct for biases in long-term filter-based absorption datasets and accurately quantify their variability and trends needed for robust radiative forcing determination.
AbstractList Measurement of light absorption of solar radiation by aerosols is vital for assessing direct aerosol radiative forcing, which affects local and global climate. Low-cost and easy-to-operate filter-based instruments, such as the Particle Soot Absorption Photometer (PSAP), that collect aerosols on a filter and measure light attenuation through the filter are widely used to infer aerosol light absorption. However, filter-based absorption measurements are subject to artifacts that are difficult to quantify. These artifacts are associated with the presence of the filter medium and the complex interactions between the filter fibers and accumulated aerosols. Various correction algorithms have been introduced to correct for the filter-based absorption coefficient measurements toward predicting the particle-phase absorption coefficient ( Babs ). However, the inability of these algorithms to incorporate into their formulations the complex matrix of influencing parameters such as particle asymmetry parameter, particle size, and particle penetration depth results in prediction of particle-phase absorption coefficients with relatively low accuracy. The analytical forms of corrections also suffer from a lack of universal applicability: different corrections are required for rural and urban sites across the world. In this study, we analyzed and compared 3 months of high-time-resolution ambient aerosol absorption data collected synchronously using a three-wavelength photoacoustic absorption spectrometer (PASS) and PSAP. Both instruments were operated on the same sampling inlet at the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program's Southern Great Plains (SGP) user facility in Oklahoma. We implemented the two most commonly used analytical correction algorithms, namely, Virkkula (2010) and the average of Virkkula (2010) and Ogren (2010)–Bond et al. (1999) as well as a random forest regression (RFR) machine learning algorithm to predict Babs values from the PSAP's filter-based measurements. The predicted Babs was compared against the reference Babs measured by the PASS. The RFR algorithm performed the best by yielding the lowest root mean square error of prediction. The algorithm was trained using input datasets from the PSAP (transmission and uncorrected absorption coefficient), a co-located nephelometer (scattering coefficients), and the Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (mass concentration of non-refractory aerosol particles). A revised form of the Virkkula (2010) algorithm suitable for the SGP site has been proposed; however, its performance yields approximately 2-fold errors when compared to the RFR algorithm. To generalize the accuracy and applicability of our proposed RFR algorithm, we trained and tested it on a dataset of laboratory measurements of combustion aerosols. Input variables to the algorithm included the aerosol number size distribution from the Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer, absorption coefficients from the filter-based Tricolor Absorption Photometer, and scattering coefficients from a multiwavelength nephelometer. The RFR algorithm predicted Babs values within 5 % of the reference Babs measured by the multiwavelength PASS during the laboratory experiments. Thus, we show that machine learning approaches offer a promising path to correct for biases in long-term filter-based absorption datasets and accurately quantify their variability and trends needed for robust radiative forcing determination.
Measurement of light absorption of solar radiation by aerosols is vital for assessing direct aerosol radiative forcing, which affects local and global climate. Low-cost and easy-to-operate filter-based instruments, such as the Particle Soot Absorption Photometer (PSAP), that collect aerosols on a filter and measure light attenuation through the filter are widely used to infer aerosol light absorption. However, filter-based absorption measurements are subject to artifacts that are difficult to quantify. These artifacts are associated with the presence of the filter medium and the complex interactions between the filter fibers and accumulated aerosols. Various correction algorithms have been introduced to correct for the filter-based absorption coefficient measurements toward predicting the particle-phase absorption coefficient (Babs). However, the inability of these algorithms to incorporate into their formulations the complex matrix of influencing parameters such as particle asymmetry parameter, particle size, and particle penetration depth results in prediction of particle-phase absorption coefficients with relatively low accuracy. The analytical forms of corrections also suffer from a lack of universal applicability: different corrections are required for rural and urban sites across the world. In this study, we analyzed and compared 3 months of high-time-resolution ambient aerosol absorption data collected synchronously using a three-wavelength photoacoustic absorption spectrometer (PASS) and PSAP. Both instruments were operated on the same sampling inlet at the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program's Southern Great Plains (SGP) user facility in Oklahoma. We implemented the two most commonly used analytical correction algorithms, namely, Virkkula (2010) and the average of Virkkula (2010) and Ogren (2010)–Bond et al. (1999) as well as a random forest regression (RFR) machine learning algorithm to predict Babs values from the PSAP's filter-based measurements. The predicted Babs was compared against the reference Babs measured by the PASS. The RFR algorithm performed the best by yielding the lowest root mean square error of prediction. The algorithm was trained using input datasets from the PSAP (transmission and uncorrected absorption coefficient), a co-located nephelometer (scattering coefficients), and the Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (mass concentration of non-refractory aerosol particles). A revised form of the Virkkula (2010) algorithm suitable for the SGP site has been proposed; however, its performance yields approximately 2-fold errors when compared to the RFR algorithm. To generalize the accuracy and applicability of our proposed RFR algorithm, we trained and tested it on a dataset of laboratory measurements of combustion aerosols. Input variables to the algorithm included the aerosol number size distribution from the Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer, absorption coefficients from the filter-based Tricolor Absorption Photometer, and scattering coefficients from a multiwavelength nephelometer. The RFR algorithm predicted Babs values within 5 % of the reference Babs measured by the multiwavelength PASS during the laboratory experiments. Thus, we show that machine learning approaches offer a promising path to correct for biases in long-term filter-based absorption datasets and accurately quantify their variability and trends needed for robust radiative forcing determination.
Measurement of light absorption of solar radiation by aerosols is vital for assessing direct aerosol radiative forcing, which affects local and global climate. Low-cost and easy-to-operate filter-based instruments, such as the Particle Soot Absorption Photometer (PSAP), that collect aerosols on a filter and measure light attenuation through the filter are widely used to infer aerosol light absorption. However, filter-based absorption measurements are subject to artifacts that are difficult to quantify. These artifacts are associated with the presence of the filter medium and the complex interactions between the filter fibers and accumulated aerosols. Various correction algorithms have been introduced to correct for the filter-based absorption coefficient measurements toward predicting the particle-phase absorption coefficient (Babs). However, the inability of these algorithms to incorporate into their formulations the complex matrix of influencing parameters such as particle asymmetry parameter, particle size, and particle penetration depth results in prediction of particle-phase absorption coefficients with relatively low accuracy. The analytical forms of corrections also suffer from a lack of universal applicability: different corrections are required for rural and urban sites across the world. In this study, we analyzed and compared 3 months of high-time-resolution ambient aerosol absorption data collected synchronously using a three-wavelength photoacoustic absorption spectrometer (PASS) and PSAP. Both instruments were operated on the same sampling inlet at the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program's Southern Great Plains (SGP) user facility in Oklahoma. We implemented the two most commonly used analytical correction algorithms, namely, Virkkula (2010) and the average of Virkkula (2010) and Ogren (2010)–Bond et al. (1999) as well as a random forest regression (RFR) machine learning algorithm to predict Babs values from the PSAP's filter-based measurements. The predicted Babs was compared against the reference Babs measured by the PASS. The RFR algorithm performed the best by yielding the lowest root mean square error of prediction. The algorithm was trained using input datasets from the PSAP (transmission and uncorrected absorption coefficient), a co-located nephelometer (scattering coefficients), and the Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (mass concentration of non-refractory aerosol particles). A revised form of the Virkkula (2010) algorithm suitable for the SGP site has been proposed; however, its performance yields approximately 2-fold errors when compared to the RFR algorithm. To generalize the accuracy and applicability of our proposed RFR algorithm, we trained and tested it on a dataset of laboratory measurements of combustion aerosols. Input variables to the algorithm included the aerosol number size distribution from the Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer, absorption coefficients from the filter-based Tricolor Absorption Photometer, and scattering coefficients from a multiwavelength nephelometer. The RFR algorithm predicted Babs values within 5 % of the reference Babs measured by the multiwavelength PASS during the laboratory experiments. Thus, we show that machine learning approaches offer a promising path to correct for biases in long-term filter-based absorption datasets and accurately quantify their variability and trends needed for robust radiative forcing determination.
Measurement of light absorption of solar radiation by aerosols is vital for assessing direct aerosol radiative forcing, which affects local and global climate. Low-cost and easy-to-operate filter-based instruments, such as the Particle Soot Absorption Photometer (PSAP), that collect aerosols on a filter and measure light attenuation through the filter are widely used to infer aerosol light absorption. However, filter-based absorption measurements are subject to artifacts that are difficult to quantify. These artifacts are associated with the presence of the filter medium and the complex interactions between the filter fibers and accumulated aerosols. Various correction algorithms have been introduced to correct for the filter-based absorption coefficient measurements toward predicting the particle-phase absorption coefficient (B.sub.abs). However, the inability of these algorithms to incorporate into their formulations the complex matrix of influencing parameters such as particle asymmetry parameter, particle size, and particle penetration depth results in prediction of particle-phase absorption coefficients with relatively low accuracy. The analytical forms of corrections also suffer from a lack of universal applicability: different corrections are required for rural and urban sites across the world. In this study, we analyzed and compared 3 months of high-time-resolution ambient aerosol absorption data collected synchronously using a three-wavelength photoacoustic absorption spectrometer (PASS) and PSAP. Both instruments were operated on the same sampling inlet at the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program's Southern Great Plains (SGP) user facility in Oklahoma. We implemented the two most commonly used analytical correction algorithms, namely, Virkkula (2010) and the average of Virkkula (2010) and Ogren (2010)-Bond et al. (1999) as well as a random forest regression (RFR) machine learning algorithm to predict B.sub.abs values from the PSAP's filter-based measurements. The predicted B.sub.abs was compared against the reference B.sub.abs measured by the PASS. The RFR algorithm performed the best by yielding the lowest root mean square error of prediction. The algorithm was trained using input datasets from the PSAP (transmission and uncorrected absorption coefficient), a co-located nephelometer (scattering coefficients), and the Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (mass concentration of non-refractory aerosol particles). A revised form of the Virkkula (2010) algorithm suitable for the SGP site has been proposed; however, its performance yields approximately 2-fold errors when compared to the RFR algorithm. To generalize the accuracy and applicability of our proposed RFR algorithm, we trained and tested it on a dataset of laboratory measurements of combustion aerosols. Input variables to the algorithm included the aerosol number size distribution from the Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer, absorption coefficients from the filter-based Tricolor Absorption Photometer, and scattering coefficients from a multiwavelength nephelometer. The RFR algorithm predicted B.sub.abs values within 5 % of the reference B.sub.abs measured by the multiwavelength PASS during the laboratory experiments. Thus, we show that machine learning approaches offer a promising path to correct for biases in long-term filter-based absorption datasets and accurately quantify their variability and trends needed for robust radiative forcing determination.
Audience Academic
Author Paik, Theo
Kumar, Joshin
Shetty, Nishit J.
Aiken, Allison C.
Dubey, Manvendra K.
Chakrabarty, Rajan K.
Sheridan, Patrick
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Joshin
  surname: Kumar
  fullname: Kumar, Joshin
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Theo
  surname: Paik
  fullname: Paik, Theo
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Nishit J.
  surname: Shetty
  fullname: Shetty, Nishit J.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Patrick
  surname: Sheridan
  fullname: Sheridan, Patrick
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Allison C.
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5749-7626
  surname: Aiken
  fullname: Aiken, Allison C.
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Manvendra K.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-3492-790X
  surname: Dubey
  fullname: Dubey, Manvendra K.
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Rajan K.
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5753-9937
  surname: Chakrabarty
  fullname: Chakrabarty, Rajan K.
BackLink https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1881355$$D View this record in Osti.gov
BookMark eNp1ks1u1DAUhSNUJNrCnqUFC8QixU7i_CxHFZSRikBt99aNfZPxKLEH25Hg6Xg17syAyiBQFomc75zja5-L7Mx5h1n2UvArKbrqHcwpFzKvZN3lBS-KJ9m5aOsmb2XVnv3x_Sy7iHHLeV2JpjjPflz7EFAn60Y2-MAGOyUMeQ8RDQMMPvqJTXbcJAZ99GGXrHest_Q_MkgsbZCt0uzjboPBanYHxsKB-YQQl4AzusR2wY8B5jeR3fuFJMGxm4Ak_zKBdZFFm5Atcb-J3cYnD9ovMZHd_GhCcc6wGfTGOmQTQnDEP8-eDjBFfPHrfZk9fHj_cP0xv_18s75e3eZa8iblg6iRaylMx7FBOUhuKt0M0OlOdk3JS1113HDZ9Aa0LviAfdkh9gXvua5leZmtj7bGw1btgp0hfFcerDos-DAqCLThCZWRUOiyb7kBWQ2m7Q2ZGm1KXhWygJ68Xh29PI2ooqbZ9UZ75-galGhbUcp94OsjREf3dcGY1NYvwdGIqmg47xpRVfUjNQIlWzf4FEDPNmq1akTZlFXdtERd_YOix-BsKRjp0vFU8PZEQEzCb2mEJUa1vr87Zesjq6krMeCgaKBDAyjETkpwte-non4qIdW-n2rfTxLyv4S_j_W_kp94kO5u
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaerosci_2024_106518
crossref_primary_10_5194_amt_15_4569_2022
crossref_primary_10_1080_02786826_2024_2384892
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2024_177872
Cites_doi 10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0004.1
10.5194/amt-3-457-2010
10.5194/acp-15-12487-2015
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.060
10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.06.023
10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0175.1
10.1080/027868299304435
10.1080/02786826.2010.482111
10.1029/2021JD035428
10.2172/1433185
10.1080/027868202753503985
10.5194/amt-13-2865-2020
10.1080/02786820701344589
10.1038/s41467-020-20482-9
10.1175/1520-0477(1994)075<1201:TARMPP>2.0.CO;2
10.2172/1756406
10.5194/acp-18-6259-2018
10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.12.009
10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.01.004
10.1023/A:1010933404324
10.2172/1246162
10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00359-8
10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105809
10.1029/2001JD000785
10.5194/acp-10-10387-2010
10.1080/02786826.2021.1873909
10.5194/acp-19-8817-2019
10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00361-6
10.5194/acp-21-5101-2021
10.1080/02786826.2010.482110
10.5194/amt-7-4049-2014
10.1002/2017GL076926
10.5194/amt-15-4569-2022
10.1364/AO.21.003011
10.1080/027868290901963
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2022 Copernicus GmbH
2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2022 Copernicus GmbH
– notice: 2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
CorporateAuthor Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
CorporateAuthor_xml – name: Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
ISR
7QH
7TG
7TN
7UA
8FD
8FE
8FG
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
ARAPS
AZQEC
BENPR
BFMQW
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BKSAR
C1K
CCPQU
DWQXO
F1W
H8D
H96
HCIFZ
KL.
L.G
L7M
P5Z
P62
PCBAR
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
OTOTI
DOA
DOI 10.5194/amt-15-4569-2022
DatabaseName CrossRef
Gale In Context: Science
Aqualine
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts
Oceanic Abstracts
Water Resources Abstracts
Technology Research Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
Continental Europe Database
Technology collection
Natural Science Collection
Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Aerospace Database
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources
SciTech Premium Collection
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
OSTI.GOV
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Publicly Available Content Database
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Technology Collection
Technology Research Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central China
Water Resources Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
Aerospace Database
ProQuest One Sustainability
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts
Oceanic Abstracts
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Central (New)
Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database
ProQuest Technology Collection
Continental Europe Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
Aqualine
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic
Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
DatabaseTitleList

Publicly Available Content Database
CrossRef

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 8FG
  name: ProQuest Technology Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Meteorology & Climatology
Environmental Sciences
EISSN 1867-8548
EndPage 4583
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_d5a2c3b80da54fd8bd7bddcd304252ab
1881355
A713734678
10_5194_amt_15_4569_2022
GeographicLocations United States--US
Alaska
Great Plains
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Alaska
– name: United States--US
– name: Great Plains
GroupedDBID 23N
5VS
8FE
8FG
8FH
8R4
8R5
AAFWJ
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACUHS
ADBBV
AEGXH
AENEX
AEUYN
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHGZY
AIAGR
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ARAPS
BCNDV
BENPR
BFMQW
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BKSAR
BPHCQ
CCPQU
CITATION
D1K
E3Z
ESX
GROUPED_DOAJ
H13
HCIFZ
IAO
IEA
ISR
ITC
K6-
KQ8
LK5
M7R
OK1
P2P
P62
PCBAR
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
Q2X
RKB
RNS
TR2
TUS
BBORY
PMFND
7QH
7TG
7TN
7UA
8FD
AZQEC
C1K
DWQXO
F1W
H8D
H96
KL.
L.G
L7M
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQUKI
PRINS
3V.
M~E
OTOTI
RIG
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-f16e0c51d90e7e5f50d4c7fa9c9597303c490d057bdacc20feb39eeb20b0c653
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1867-8548
1867-1381
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:34:52 EDT 2025
Mon Apr 01 04:55:20 EDT 2024
Sat Jul 19 10:41:17 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 20:58:28 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:36:51 EDT 2025
Fri Jun 27 04:46:34 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:12:06 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:54:56 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 15
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c507t-f16e0c51d90e7e5f50d4c7fa9c9597303c490d057bdacc20feb39eeb20b0c653
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
LA-UR-23-23575
National Science Foundation (NSF)
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES)
SC0021011; 89233218CNA000001; AGS-1926817
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)
ORCID 0000-0001-5753-9937
0000-0001-5749-7626
0000-0002-3492-790X
0000000157497626
000000023492790X
0000000157539937
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/d5a2c3b80da54fd8bd7bddcd304252ab
PQID 2700971446
PQPubID 105742
PageCount 15
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d5a2c3b80da54fd8bd7bddcd304252ab
osti_scitechconnect_1881355
proquest_journals_2700971446
gale_infotracmisc_A713734678
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A713734678
gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A713734678
crossref_citationtrail_10_5194_amt_15_4569_2022
crossref_primary_10_5194_amt_15_4569_2022
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-08-12
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-08-12
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-08-12
  day: 12
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Katlenburg-Lindau
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Katlenburg-Lindau
– name: Germany
PublicationTitle Atmospheric measurement techniques
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher Copernicus GmbH
Copernicus Publications
Publisher_xml – name: Copernicus GmbH
– name: Copernicus Publications
References ref13
ref35
ref12
ref34
ref15
ref37
ref14
ref36
ref31
ref30
ref11
ref33
ref10
ref32
ref2
ref1
ref17
ref39
ref16
ref38
ref19
ref18
ref24
ref23
ref26
ref25
ref20
ref42
ref41
ref22
ref21
ref43
ref28
ref27
ref29
ref8
ref7
ref9
ref4
ref3
ref6
ref5
ref40
References_xml – ident: ref3
– ident: ref5
– ident: ref7
– ident: ref34
  doi: 10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0004.1
– ident: ref22
– ident: ref13
  doi: 10.5194/amt-3-457-2010
– ident: ref31
  doi: 10.5194/acp-15-12487-2015
– ident: ref27
– ident: ref29
  doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.060
– ident: ref28
  doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.06.023
– ident: ref1
  doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0175.1
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.1080/027868299304435
– ident: ref26
  doi: 10.1080/02786826.2010.482111
– ident: ref11
– ident: ref24
  doi: 10.1029/2021JD035428
– ident: ref15
  doi: 10.2172/1433185
– ident: ref16
  doi: 10.1080/027868202753503985
– ident: ref19
  doi: 10.5194/amt-13-2865-2020
– ident: ref37
  doi: 10.1080/02786820701344589
– ident: ref4
– ident: ref10
  doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20482-9
– ident: ref36
  doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(1994)075<1201:TARMPP>2.0.CO;2
– ident: ref39
  doi: 10.2172/1756406
– ident: ref20
  doi: 10.5194/acp-18-6259-2018
– ident: ref6
– ident: ref38
  doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.12.009
– ident: ref25
  doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.01.004
– ident: ref9
  doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
– ident: ref35
  doi: 10.2172/1246162
– ident: ref42
  doi: 10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00359-8
– ident: ref17
  doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105809
– ident: ref30
  doi: 10.1029/2001JD000785
– ident: ref14
  doi: 10.5194/acp-10-10387-2010
– ident: ref32
  doi: 10.1080/02786826.2021.1873909
– ident: ref33
  doi: 10.5194/acp-19-8817-2019
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00361-6
– ident: ref21
  doi: 10.5194/acp-21-5101-2021
– ident: ref40
  doi: 10.1080/02786826.2010.482110
– ident: ref23
  doi: 10.5194/amt-7-4049-2014
– ident: ref43
  doi: 10.1002/2017GL076926
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.5194/amt-15-4569-2022
– ident: ref12
  doi: 10.1364/AO.21.003011
– ident: ref41
  doi: 10.1080/027868290901963
SSID ssj0064172
Score 2.3410826
Snippet Measurement of light absorption of solar radiation by aerosols is vital for assessing direct aerosol radiative forcing, which affects local and global climate....
Measurement of light absorption of solar radiation by aerosols is vital for assessing direct aerosol radiative forcing, which affects local and global climate....
SourceID doaj
osti
proquest
gale
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
StartPage 4569
SubjectTerms Absorption
Absorption coefficient
Absorptivity
Accuracy
aerosol
Aerosol absorption
Aerosol concentrations
Aerosol light absorption
Aerosol particles
Aerosols
Algorithms
angstrom exponent
Atmospheric radiation
Atmospheric radiation measurements
Chemical speciation
climate
Corrections
Data mining
Datasets
Downward long wave radiation
earth sciences
Electromagnetic absorption
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Global climate
Handbooks
Instruments
Laboratory experimentation
Laboratory experiments
Lasers
Learning algorithms
Light
Light absorption
Light attenuation
Local climates
Machine learning
Mathematical analysis
Measurement
Measuring instruments
Nephelometers
Parameters
particle
Penetration depth
Photometers
Radiation
Radiation absorption
Radiation measurement
Radiative forcing
Scattering coefficient
Size distribution
Solar radiation
Soot
Speciation
Urban areas
Wavelength
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: ProQuest Technology Collection
  dbid: 8FG
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Nj9MwELWgXLggPkXZBY0QYsUhapzGSXxCpaIsSEVoWaS9Wc44KZXapDTZ38dfY8Z1W1VIe2w8ThOPPX4znrwR4h3KuNQqqSOVFeMoTWOMrE5p4dXWlqnVFkuOd8y_Z5e_0m836iYE3LqQVrm3id5QuxY5Rj7iA1Kds_fycfMn4qpRfLoaSmjcFw9kQjOJvxSffdlb4iyVvngTc7Yx157cHVMSZklHdt1HUkUEHzRNlCQ52ZY8e__BRg9aWmz_mWq__8wei0cBOMJkp-kn4l7VPBXDOWHedutD4_AepqslAVD_65n4O-XCG8hpzUDIFOolH4xHvG05sBU9RruCFfvmYMuu3XrbAeWS2juwPRAyhEm_bjsmHlgiXDGLgZeZH-OKEPK7LjrwxfiqbQM-6gA_VnbZdMDDB5xcv4DN77ZvyQD7-mGwPt6E_q5xsPZpnRWEOhaL5-J69vl6ehmFcg0REqjso1pmVYxKOh1XeaVqFbsU89pq1OS10FaJqY4d4cPSWcQkrsmP1xV59nEZY6bGL8SgaZvqpYAqQwJyGl1uHfXRts6L2ErtpHW1dm4oRntlGQxU5lxRY2XIpWH1GlKvkcqweg2rdyg-HHpsdjQed8h-Yv0f5JiA219otwsT1rNxyiY4LovYWZXWrigdvZZDx9EhldhyKN7y7DFMsdFwDs_C3nad-frzykxyOc7HtEEVQ3ERhOqWnh9t-CSCRoFZuU4kz08kyQbgSfMZT1JDqImpf5FzpJDeqigk4UnqvJ-7JliozhzX06u7m8_EQx4VjqPL5FwM-u1t9ZqAWF--8avtH9_xNoY
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Correcting for filter-based aerosol light absorption biases at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program's Southern Great Plains site using photoacoustic measurements and machine learning
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/2700971446
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1881355
https://doaj.org/article/d5a2c3b80da54fd8bd7bddcd304252ab
Volume 15
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVAFT
  databaseName: Open Access Digital Library
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1867-8548
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0064172
  issn: 1867-8548
  databaseCode: KQ8
  dateStart: 20080101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html
  providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries
– providerCode: PRVAON
  databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1867-8548
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0064172
  issn: 1867-8548
  databaseCode: DOA
  dateStart: 20080101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– providerCode: PRVEBS
  databaseName: EBSCOhost Academic Search Ultimate
  customDbUrl: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s3936755&profile=ehost&defaultdb=asn
  eissn: 1867-8548
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0064172
  issn: 1867-8548
  databaseCode: ABDBF
  dateStart: 20100501
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.ebscohost.com/direct.asp?db=asn
  providerName: EBSCOhost
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: Continental Europe Database
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1867-8548
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0064172
  issn: 1867-8548
  databaseCode: BFMQW
  dateStart: 20100501
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/conteurope
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518
  eissn: 1867-8548
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0064172
  issn: 1867-8548
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 20100501
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Technology Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1867-8548
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0064172
  issn: 1867-8548
  databaseCode: 8FG
  dateStart: 20100501
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1
  providerName: ProQuest
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9NAEF5BuHBBPEVoiUYIUXGw4nW8tveYRg0FKVUVitTbah_eNlJiV7H7-_hrzKydlAgJLhwTj5P1zuzsN7Pjbxj7aHlspEh8JLJiEqVpbCMtU1x4XmuTaqmtoXzH4iI7_5F-uxbXv7X6opqwjh64m7ixEzqxE1PETovUu8K43DhnHYXhItGGvC9uY7tgqvPBWcpD2yZiayOWPd4dUCJaScd600ZcRAgcJJpIkhxsSIG3f--dBzUusz-cdNh55s_Zsx4ywrQb6gv2qKxesuEC0W69DUlx-ASz9QqhZ_j0iv2cUcsNSwXNgJgU_IqOxCPasBzoEodRr2FNUTlo09Tb4DXArPB6A7oFxIQwbTd1Q5QDKwtL4i8IMouHjCL0lV0nDYQ2fOW2gpBvgMu1XlUN0LE0UFn9Ddzd1m2Nrjd0DoPNw4_g31UONqGgs4S-g8XNa3Y1P7uanUd9o4bIIpxsI8-zMraCOxmXeSm8iF1qc6-llRiv4CZpUxk7RIbGaWuT2GMEL0uM6WMT20xM3rBBVVflWwZlZhHCSety7fAeqX1exJpLx7Xz0rkhG--UpWxPYk69NNYKgxlSr0L1Ki4UqVeReofs8_6Ou47A4y-yp6T_vRxRb4cv0CBVb5DqXwY5ZB_IehSRa1RUvXOj75tGff2-VNOcT_IJbk3FkJ30Qr7G8VvdvwyBs0B8XAeSxweSuPrtweUjMlKFeIlIfy1VR1l8qqLgiCTx5p3tqt43NYpKDWROeYB3_-N5j9hTmjvKs_PkmA3a7X35HoFaa0bscTH_MmJPTs8uLpejsEJ_AYg7Q1s
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V3NbtNAEF6V9AAX_hGhBUYIWnFwYzv-2wOHNBAltKmgBNHbar1rh4jEDrEjBO_EM_AGPBMzGztRQOqtB46JZ5PsZH6-mZ2dYey5cuyY-25q-UHUtjzPVpbkHipeKmXsSS5VTPmO4VnQ_-i9vfAvdtjP-i4MlVXWNtEYap0rypG36ICUhxS9VBWUJ8n3bxifFa8Gr_HPfOG6vTejbt-qRghYCoFOaaVOkNjKdzS3kzDxU9_WngpTyRVHJI3mW3nc1ohZYi2Vcu0UY0ueYLRpx7YKaCKEezD_atGQKjrMrSZ2XGO7UcAju8F2j3vD959q0x94jpkWRU3iqLmfszoXRZDkteSstBzfQrzCUTJdd8sPmnEBa6fQyFG7__ENxuH1brHfNatWdS5fjpZlfKR-_NVF8r_h5W12s4Le0Fnpyh22k2R3WXOIUUO-MIcLcADd6QQhvHl1j_3q0ugSRYXhgNge0gmVFljk-DXIBPmaT2FK2Q2QcZEvjPWFeILPC5AlILaGTjnLC2rdMFFwTn0gDM1wk5mFqkLusAAzzjBZZGDyNvBuKidZAbQLoOsJY5h_zsscXZiZwAazzYfg12UaZqYwNoFqEsj4PhtdBYcfsEaWZ8lDBkmgEApzpUOpcQ2XaRjZ0uHakTrlWjdZq5Y-oapm8DSTZCowKCR5FSivwvEFyasgeW2yl-sV81UjlEtoj0mg13TUwty8kS_GorKIQvvSVe04srX0vVRHscZtaaUpv-a7Mm6yZ6QOgpqUZFQFNZbLohCDD-eiEzrtsI0uPmqyw4oozfH3K1ldKkEuUF-zLcr9LUq0omrr8R5pnUDcSc2TFVWZKdxVFDmIyHFxrUiisvGF2GjRo8sfP2XX-6PhqTgdnJ3ssRvEITqVcNx91igXy-QxwtoyflIZE2DiirXwD1iSuHg
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lb9NAEF5VqYS48EaEFhghoOLgxnb82gNCaUrUUlKVUkRvq_XuOkQkdohdIfhnnPgf_BpmNnaigNRbDxyTnU3iyTy-mZ2dYeyZ8tyUh37mhFHSdYLAVY7kASpeJmUaSC5VSvmO4XF08DF4ex6eb7CfzV0YKqtsbKI11LpQlCPv0AEpjyl66WR1WcTJ_uD17KtDE6TopLUZp7EQkSPz_RuGb-Wrw338r5_7_uDNWf_AqScMOApxUOVkXmRcFXqauyY2YRa6OlBxJrniCLTRuquAuxohTaqlUr6bYejJDQajbuqqiAZGoPXfTCJEqC22uTcYvv_UuIEo8OzkKGoYR43-vMUZKQKmoCOnleOFDmIXjlLq-2s-0Y4OWDqIVoGa_o-fsM5vcJP9bti2qHn5sntRpbvqx18dJf9Lvt5iN2pIDr2FDt1mGya_w9pDjCaKuT10gBfQn4wR2ttXd9mvPo00UVQwDoj5IRtTyYFDgECDNMjjYgITynqATMtibq0ypGNcL0FWgJgbetW0KKmlw1jBKfWHsDTDVcYW6sq5nRLsmEMzz8Hmc-BkIsd5CcQ0oGsLI5h9LqoCXZudzAbT1Yfg1-UaprZg1kA9IWR0j51dBTvvs1Ze5OYBAxMphMhc6Vhq3MNlFieu9Lj2pM641m3WaSRRqLpJPM0qmQgMFkl2Bcqu8EJBsitIdtvs5XLHbNEg5RLaPRLuJR21NrdvFPORqC2l0KH0VTdNXC3DINNJqvGxtNKUdwt9mbbZU1INQc1LchLXkbwoS3H44VT0Yq8bd9H1J222UxNlBf5-JevLJsgF6ne2Rrm9RonWVa0tb5EGCsSj1FRZUfWZwqdKEg-ROm5ulErUtr8UK416ePnyE3YNVU28Ozw-2mLXiUF0WOH526xVzS_MI0S7Vfq4tivAxBVr3B-sZcE3
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correcting+for+filter-based+aerosol+light+absorption+biases+at+the+Atmospheric+Radiation+Measurement+program%27s+Southern+Great+Plains+site+using+photoacoustic+measurements+and+machine+learning&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric+measurement+techniques&rft.au=Kumar%2C+Joshin&rft.au=Paik%2C+Theo&rft.au=Shetty%2C+Nishit+J&rft.au=Sheridan%2C+Patrick&rft.date=2022-08-12&rft.pub=Copernicus+GmbH&rft.issn=1867-1381&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=4569&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194%2Famt-15-4569-2022&rft.externalDBID=ISR&rft.externalDocID=A713734678
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1867-8548&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1867-8548&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1867-8548&client=summon