Correcting for filter-based aerosol light absorption biases at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program's Southern Great Plains site using photoacoustic measurements and machine learning
Measurement of light absorption of solar radiation by aerosols is vital for assessing direct aerosol radiative forcing, which affects local and global climate. Low-cost and easy-to-operate filter-based instruments, such as the Particle Soot Absorption Photometer (PSAP), that collect aerosols on a fi...
Saved in:
Published in | Atmospheric measurement techniques Vol. 15; no. 15; pp. 4569 - 4583 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Katlenburg-Lindau
Copernicus GmbH
12.08.2022
Copernicus Publications |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1867-8548 1867-1381 1867-8548 |
DOI | 10.5194/amt-15-4569-2022 |
Cover
Abstract | Measurement of light absorption of solar radiation by
aerosols is vital for assessing direct aerosol radiative forcing, which
affects local and global climate. Low-cost and easy-to-operate filter-based
instruments, such as the Particle Soot Absorption Photometer (PSAP), that collect aerosols on a filter and measure light attenuation through the
filter are widely used to infer aerosol light absorption. However,
filter-based absorption measurements are subject to artifacts that are
difficult to quantify. These artifacts are associated with the presence of
the filter medium and the complex interactions between the filter fibers and accumulated aerosols. Various correction algorithms have been introduced to correct for the filter-based absorption coefficient measurements toward predicting the particle-phase absorption coefficient (Babs). However, the inability of these algorithms to incorporate into their formulations the complex matrix of influencing parameters such as particle asymmetry parameter, particle size, and particle penetration depth results in prediction of particle-phase absorption coefficients with relatively low accuracy. The analytical forms of corrections also suffer from a lack of universal applicability: different corrections are required for rural and
urban sites across the world. In this study, we analyzed and compared 3 months of high-time-resolution ambient aerosol absorption data collected
synchronously using a three-wavelength photoacoustic absorption spectrometer (PASS) and PSAP. Both instruments were operated on the same sampling inlet
at the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program's Southern Great Plains (SGP) user facility in Oklahoma. We implemented the two most
commonly used analytical correction algorithms, namely, Virkkula (2010) and the average of Virkkula (2010) and Ogren (2010)–Bond et al. (1999) as well as a random forest regression (RFR) machine learning algorithm to predict Babs values from the PSAP's filter-based measurements. The predicted Babs was compared against the reference Babs measured by the PASS. The RFR algorithm performed the best by yielding the lowest root mean square
error of prediction. The algorithm was trained using input datasets from the PSAP (transmission and uncorrected absorption coefficient), a co-located
nephelometer (scattering coefficients), and the Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (mass concentration of non-refractory aerosol particles). A revised
form of the Virkkula (2010) algorithm suitable for the SGP site has been
proposed; however, its performance yields approximately 2-fold errors when compared to the RFR algorithm. To generalize the accuracy and applicability
of our proposed RFR algorithm, we trained and tested it on a dataset of
laboratory measurements of combustion aerosols. Input variables to the
algorithm included the aerosol number size distribution from the Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer, absorption coefficients from the filter-based
Tricolor Absorption Photometer, and scattering coefficients from a
multiwavelength nephelometer. The RFR algorithm predicted Babs values within 5 % of the reference Babs measured by the multiwavelength PASS during the laboratory experiments. Thus, we show that machine learning
approaches offer a promising path to correct for biases in long-term
filter-based absorption datasets and accurately quantify their variability
and trends needed for robust radiative forcing determination. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Measurement of light absorption of solar radiation by aerosols is vital for assessing direct aerosol radiative forcing, which affects local and global climate. Low-cost and easy-to-operate filter-based instruments, such as the Particle Soot Absorption Photometer (PSAP), that collect aerosols on a filter and measure light attenuation through the filter are widely used to infer aerosol light absorption. However, filter-based absorption measurements are subject to artifacts that are difficult to quantify. These artifacts are associated with the presence of the filter medium and the complex interactions between the filter fibers and accumulated aerosols. Various correction algorithms have been introduced to correct for the filter-based absorption coefficient measurements toward predicting the particle-phase absorption coefficient ( Babs ). However, the inability of these algorithms to incorporate into their formulations the complex matrix of influencing parameters such as particle asymmetry parameter, particle size, and particle penetration depth results in prediction of particle-phase absorption coefficients with relatively low accuracy. The analytical forms of corrections also suffer from a lack of universal applicability: different corrections are required for rural and urban sites across the world. In this study, we analyzed and compared 3 months of high-time-resolution ambient aerosol absorption data collected synchronously using a three-wavelength photoacoustic absorption spectrometer (PASS) and PSAP. Both instruments were operated on the same sampling inlet at the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program's Southern Great Plains (SGP) user facility in Oklahoma. We implemented the two most commonly used analytical correction algorithms, namely, Virkkula (2010) and the average of Virkkula (2010) and Ogren (2010)–Bond et al. (1999) as well as a random forest regression (RFR) machine learning algorithm to predict Babs values from the PSAP's filter-based measurements. The predicted Babs was compared against the reference Babs measured by the PASS. The RFR algorithm performed the best by yielding the lowest root mean square error of prediction. The algorithm was trained using input datasets from the PSAP (transmission and uncorrected absorption coefficient), a co-located nephelometer (scattering coefficients), and the Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (mass concentration of non-refractory aerosol particles). A revised form of the Virkkula (2010) algorithm suitable for the SGP site has been proposed; however, its performance yields approximately 2-fold errors when compared to the RFR algorithm. To generalize the accuracy and applicability of our proposed RFR algorithm, we trained and tested it on a dataset of laboratory measurements of combustion aerosols. Input variables to the algorithm included the aerosol number size distribution from the Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer, absorption coefficients from the filter-based Tricolor Absorption Photometer, and scattering coefficients from a multiwavelength nephelometer. The RFR algorithm predicted Babs values within 5 % of the reference Babs measured by the multiwavelength PASS during the laboratory experiments. Thus, we show that machine learning approaches offer a promising path to correct for biases in long-term filter-based absorption datasets and accurately quantify their variability and trends needed for robust radiative forcing determination. Measurement of light absorption of solar radiation by aerosols is vital for assessing direct aerosol radiative forcing, which affects local and global climate. Low-cost and easy-to-operate filter-based instruments, such as the Particle Soot Absorption Photometer (PSAP), that collect aerosols on a filter and measure light attenuation through the filter are widely used to infer aerosol light absorption. However, filter-based absorption measurements are subject to artifacts that are difficult to quantify. These artifacts are associated with the presence of the filter medium and the complex interactions between the filter fibers and accumulated aerosols. Various correction algorithms have been introduced to correct for the filter-based absorption coefficient measurements toward predicting the particle-phase absorption coefficient (Babs). However, the inability of these algorithms to incorporate into their formulations the complex matrix of influencing parameters such as particle asymmetry parameter, particle size, and particle penetration depth results in prediction of particle-phase absorption coefficients with relatively low accuracy. The analytical forms of corrections also suffer from a lack of universal applicability: different corrections are required for rural and urban sites across the world. In this study, we analyzed and compared 3 months of high-time-resolution ambient aerosol absorption data collected synchronously using a three-wavelength photoacoustic absorption spectrometer (PASS) and PSAP. Both instruments were operated on the same sampling inlet at the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program's Southern Great Plains (SGP) user facility in Oklahoma. We implemented the two most commonly used analytical correction algorithms, namely, Virkkula (2010) and the average of Virkkula (2010) and Ogren (2010)–Bond et al. (1999) as well as a random forest regression (RFR) machine learning algorithm to predict Babs values from the PSAP's filter-based measurements. The predicted Babs was compared against the reference Babs measured by the PASS. The RFR algorithm performed the best by yielding the lowest root mean square error of prediction. The algorithm was trained using input datasets from the PSAP (transmission and uncorrected absorption coefficient), a co-located nephelometer (scattering coefficients), and the Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (mass concentration of non-refractory aerosol particles). A revised form of the Virkkula (2010) algorithm suitable for the SGP site has been proposed; however, its performance yields approximately 2-fold errors when compared to the RFR algorithm. To generalize the accuracy and applicability of our proposed RFR algorithm, we trained and tested it on a dataset of laboratory measurements of combustion aerosols. Input variables to the algorithm included the aerosol number size distribution from the Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer, absorption coefficients from the filter-based Tricolor Absorption Photometer, and scattering coefficients from a multiwavelength nephelometer. The RFR algorithm predicted Babs values within 5 % of the reference Babs measured by the multiwavelength PASS during the laboratory experiments. Thus, we show that machine learning approaches offer a promising path to correct for biases in long-term filter-based absorption datasets and accurately quantify their variability and trends needed for robust radiative forcing determination. Measurement of light absorption of solar radiation by aerosols is vital for assessing direct aerosol radiative forcing, which affects local and global climate. Low-cost and easy-to-operate filter-based instruments, such as the Particle Soot Absorption Photometer (PSAP), that collect aerosols on a filter and measure light attenuation through the filter are widely used to infer aerosol light absorption. However, filter-based absorption measurements are subject to artifacts that are difficult to quantify. These artifacts are associated with the presence of the filter medium and the complex interactions between the filter fibers and accumulated aerosols. Various correction algorithms have been introduced to correct for the filter-based absorption coefficient measurements toward predicting the particle-phase absorption coefficient (Babs). However, the inability of these algorithms to incorporate into their formulations the complex matrix of influencing parameters such as particle asymmetry parameter, particle size, and particle penetration depth results in prediction of particle-phase absorption coefficients with relatively low accuracy. The analytical forms of corrections also suffer from a lack of universal applicability: different corrections are required for rural and urban sites across the world. In this study, we analyzed and compared 3 months of high-time-resolution ambient aerosol absorption data collected synchronously using a three-wavelength photoacoustic absorption spectrometer (PASS) and PSAP. Both instruments were operated on the same sampling inlet at the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program's Southern Great Plains (SGP) user facility in Oklahoma. We implemented the two most commonly used analytical correction algorithms, namely, Virkkula (2010) and the average of Virkkula (2010) and Ogren (2010)–Bond et al. (1999) as well as a random forest regression (RFR) machine learning algorithm to predict Babs values from the PSAP's filter-based measurements. The predicted Babs was compared against the reference Babs measured by the PASS. The RFR algorithm performed the best by yielding the lowest root mean square error of prediction. The algorithm was trained using input datasets from the PSAP (transmission and uncorrected absorption coefficient), a co-located nephelometer (scattering coefficients), and the Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (mass concentration of non-refractory aerosol particles). A revised form of the Virkkula (2010) algorithm suitable for the SGP site has been proposed; however, its performance yields approximately 2-fold errors when compared to the RFR algorithm. To generalize the accuracy and applicability of our proposed RFR algorithm, we trained and tested it on a dataset of laboratory measurements of combustion aerosols. Input variables to the algorithm included the aerosol number size distribution from the Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer, absorption coefficients from the filter-based Tricolor Absorption Photometer, and scattering coefficients from a multiwavelength nephelometer. The RFR algorithm predicted Babs values within 5 % of the reference Babs measured by the multiwavelength PASS during the laboratory experiments. Thus, we show that machine learning approaches offer a promising path to correct for biases in long-term filter-based absorption datasets and accurately quantify their variability and trends needed for robust radiative forcing determination. Measurement of light absorption of solar radiation by aerosols is vital for assessing direct aerosol radiative forcing, which affects local and global climate. Low-cost and easy-to-operate filter-based instruments, such as the Particle Soot Absorption Photometer (PSAP), that collect aerosols on a filter and measure light attenuation through the filter are widely used to infer aerosol light absorption. However, filter-based absorption measurements are subject to artifacts that are difficult to quantify. These artifacts are associated with the presence of the filter medium and the complex interactions between the filter fibers and accumulated aerosols. Various correction algorithms have been introduced to correct for the filter-based absorption coefficient measurements toward predicting the particle-phase absorption coefficient (B.sub.abs). However, the inability of these algorithms to incorporate into their formulations the complex matrix of influencing parameters such as particle asymmetry parameter, particle size, and particle penetration depth results in prediction of particle-phase absorption coefficients with relatively low accuracy. The analytical forms of corrections also suffer from a lack of universal applicability: different corrections are required for rural and urban sites across the world. In this study, we analyzed and compared 3 months of high-time-resolution ambient aerosol absorption data collected synchronously using a three-wavelength photoacoustic absorption spectrometer (PASS) and PSAP. Both instruments were operated on the same sampling inlet at the Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program's Southern Great Plains (SGP) user facility in Oklahoma. We implemented the two most commonly used analytical correction algorithms, namely, Virkkula (2010) and the average of Virkkula (2010) and Ogren (2010)-Bond et al. (1999) as well as a random forest regression (RFR) machine learning algorithm to predict B.sub.abs values from the PSAP's filter-based measurements. The predicted B.sub.abs was compared against the reference B.sub.abs measured by the PASS. The RFR algorithm performed the best by yielding the lowest root mean square error of prediction. The algorithm was trained using input datasets from the PSAP (transmission and uncorrected absorption coefficient), a co-located nephelometer (scattering coefficients), and the Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (mass concentration of non-refractory aerosol particles). A revised form of the Virkkula (2010) algorithm suitable for the SGP site has been proposed; however, its performance yields approximately 2-fold errors when compared to the RFR algorithm. To generalize the accuracy and applicability of our proposed RFR algorithm, we trained and tested it on a dataset of laboratory measurements of combustion aerosols. Input variables to the algorithm included the aerosol number size distribution from the Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer, absorption coefficients from the filter-based Tricolor Absorption Photometer, and scattering coefficients from a multiwavelength nephelometer. The RFR algorithm predicted B.sub.abs values within 5 % of the reference B.sub.abs measured by the multiwavelength PASS during the laboratory experiments. Thus, we show that machine learning approaches offer a promising path to correct for biases in long-term filter-based absorption datasets and accurately quantify their variability and trends needed for robust radiative forcing determination. |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Paik, Theo Kumar, Joshin Shetty, Nishit J. Aiken, Allison C. Dubey, Manvendra K. Chakrabarty, Rajan K. Sheridan, Patrick |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Joshin surname: Kumar fullname: Kumar, Joshin – sequence: 2 givenname: Theo surname: Paik fullname: Paik, Theo – sequence: 3 givenname: Nishit J. surname: Shetty fullname: Shetty, Nishit J. – sequence: 4 givenname: Patrick surname: Sheridan fullname: Sheridan, Patrick – sequence: 5 givenname: Allison C. orcidid: 0000-0001-5749-7626 surname: Aiken fullname: Aiken, Allison C. – sequence: 6 givenname: Manvendra K. orcidid: 0000-0002-3492-790X surname: Dubey fullname: Dubey, Manvendra K. – sequence: 7 givenname: Rajan K. orcidid: 0000-0001-5753-9937 surname: Chakrabarty fullname: Chakrabarty, Rajan K. |
BackLink | https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1881355$$D View this record in Osti.gov |
BookMark | eNp1ks1u1DAUhSNUJNrCnqUFC8QixU7i_CxHFZSRikBt99aNfZPxKLEH25Hg6Xg17syAyiBQFomc75zja5-L7Mx5h1n2UvArKbrqHcwpFzKvZN3lBS-KJ9m5aOsmb2XVnv3x_Sy7iHHLeV2JpjjPflz7EFAn60Y2-MAGOyUMeQ8RDQMMPvqJTXbcJAZ99GGXrHest_Q_MkgsbZCt0uzjboPBanYHxsKB-YQQl4AzusR2wY8B5jeR3fuFJMGxm4Ak_zKBdZFFm5Atcb-J3cYnD9ovMZHd_GhCcc6wGfTGOmQTQnDEP8-eDjBFfPHrfZk9fHj_cP0xv_18s75e3eZa8iblg6iRaylMx7FBOUhuKt0M0OlOdk3JS1113HDZ9Aa0LviAfdkh9gXvua5leZmtj7bGw1btgp0hfFcerDos-DAqCLThCZWRUOiyb7kBWQ2m7Q2ZGm1KXhWygJ68Xh29PI2ooqbZ9UZ75-galGhbUcp94OsjREf3dcGY1NYvwdGIqmg47xpRVfUjNQIlWzf4FEDPNmq1akTZlFXdtERd_YOix-BsKRjp0vFU8PZEQEzCb2mEJUa1vr87Zesjq6krMeCgaKBDAyjETkpwte-non4qIdW-n2rfTxLyv4S_j_W_kp94kO5u |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaerosci_2024_106518 crossref_primary_10_5194_amt_15_4569_2022 crossref_primary_10_1080_02786826_2024_2384892 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2024_177872 |
Cites_doi | 10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0004.1 10.5194/amt-3-457-2010 10.5194/acp-15-12487-2015 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.060 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.06.023 10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0175.1 10.1080/027868299304435 10.1080/02786826.2010.482111 10.1029/2021JD035428 10.2172/1433185 10.1080/027868202753503985 10.5194/amt-13-2865-2020 10.1080/02786820701344589 10.1038/s41467-020-20482-9 10.1175/1520-0477(1994)075<1201:TARMPP>2.0.CO;2 10.2172/1756406 10.5194/acp-18-6259-2018 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.12.009 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.01.004 10.1023/A:1010933404324 10.2172/1246162 10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00359-8 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105809 10.1029/2001JD000785 10.5194/acp-10-10387-2010 10.1080/02786826.2021.1873909 10.5194/acp-19-8817-2019 10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00361-6 10.5194/acp-21-5101-2021 10.1080/02786826.2010.482110 10.5194/amt-7-4049-2014 10.1002/2017GL076926 10.5194/amt-15-4569-2022 10.1364/AO.21.003011 10.1080/027868290901963 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2022 Copernicus GmbH 2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2022 Copernicus GmbH – notice: 2022. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
CorporateAuthor | Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States) |
CorporateAuthor_xml | – name: Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States) |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION ISR 7QH 7TG 7TN 7UA 8FD 8FE 8FG ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ARAPS AZQEC BENPR BFMQW BGLVJ BHPHI BKSAR C1K CCPQU DWQXO F1W H8D H96 HCIFZ KL. L.G L7M P5Z P62 PCBAR PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS OTOTI DOA |
DOI | 10.5194/amt-15-4569-2022 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Gale In Context: Science Aqualine Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Oceanic Abstracts Water Resources Abstracts Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Continental Europe Database Technology collection Natural Science Collection Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts Aerospace Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources SciTech Premium Collection Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China OSTI.GOV DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional Technology Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central China Water Resources Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences Aerospace Database ProQuest One Sustainability Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Oceanic Abstracts Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central (New) Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database ProQuest Technology Collection Continental Europe Database ProQuest SciTech Collection Aqualine Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts ProQuest One Academic Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Meteorology & Climatology Environmental Sciences |
EISSN | 1867-8548 |
EndPage | 4583 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_d5a2c3b80da54fd8bd7bddcd304252ab 1881355 A713734678 10_5194_amt_15_4569_2022 |
GeographicLocations | United States--US Alaska Great Plains |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Alaska – name: United States--US – name: Great Plains |
GroupedDBID | 23N 5VS 8FE 8FG 8FH 8R4 8R5 AAFWJ AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACUHS ADBBV AEGXH AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHGZY AIAGR ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ARAPS BCNDV BENPR BFMQW BGLVJ BHPHI BKSAR BPHCQ CCPQU CITATION D1K E3Z ESX GROUPED_DOAJ H13 HCIFZ IAO IEA ISR ITC K6- KQ8 LK5 M7R OK1 P2P P62 PCBAR PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC Q2X RKB RNS TR2 TUS BBORY PMFND 7QH 7TG 7TN 7UA 8FD AZQEC C1K DWQXO F1W H8D H96 KL. L.G L7M PKEHL PQEST PQGLB PQUKI PRINS 3V. M~E OTOTI RIG PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c507t-f16e0c51d90e7e5f50d4c7fa9c9597303c490d057bdacc20feb39eeb20b0c653 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 1867-8548 1867-1381 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:34:52 EDT 2025 Mon Apr 01 04:55:20 EDT 2024 Sat Jul 19 10:41:17 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 20:58:28 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:36:51 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 04:46:34 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:12:06 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:54:56 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 15 |
Language | English |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c507t-f16e0c51d90e7e5f50d4c7fa9c9597303c490d057bdacc20feb39eeb20b0c653 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 LA-UR-23-23575 National Science Foundation (NSF) USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES) SC0021011; 89233218CNA000001; AGS-1926817 USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER) |
ORCID | 0000-0001-5753-9937 0000-0001-5749-7626 0000-0002-3492-790X 0000000157497626 000000023492790X 0000000157539937 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/d5a2c3b80da54fd8bd7bddcd304252ab |
PQID | 2700971446 |
PQPubID | 105742 |
PageCount | 15 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_d5a2c3b80da54fd8bd7bddcd304252ab osti_scitechconnect_1881355 proquest_journals_2700971446 gale_infotracmisc_A713734678 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A713734678 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A713734678 crossref_citationtrail_10_5194_amt_15_4569_2022 crossref_primary_10_5194_amt_15_4569_2022 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2022-08-12 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-08-12 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2022 text: 2022-08-12 day: 12 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Katlenburg-Lindau |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Katlenburg-Lindau – name: Germany |
PublicationTitle | Atmospheric measurement techniques |
PublicationYear | 2022 |
Publisher | Copernicus GmbH Copernicus Publications |
Publisher_xml | – name: Copernicus GmbH – name: Copernicus Publications |
References | ref13 ref35 ref12 ref34 ref15 ref37 ref14 ref36 ref31 ref30 ref11 ref33 ref10 ref32 ref2 ref1 ref17 ref39 ref16 ref38 ref19 ref18 ref24 ref23 ref26 ref25 ref20 ref42 ref41 ref22 ref21 ref43 ref28 ref27 ref29 ref8 ref7 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 ref40 |
References_xml | – ident: ref3 – ident: ref5 – ident: ref7 – ident: ref34 doi: 10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0004.1 – ident: ref22 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.5194/amt-3-457-2010 – ident: ref31 doi: 10.5194/acp-15-12487-2015 – ident: ref27 – ident: ref29 doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.060 – ident: ref28 doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.06.023 – ident: ref1 doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0175.1 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1080/027868299304435 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.1080/02786826.2010.482111 – ident: ref11 – ident: ref24 doi: 10.1029/2021JD035428 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.2172/1433185 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1080/027868202753503985 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.5194/amt-13-2865-2020 – ident: ref37 doi: 10.1080/02786820701344589 – ident: ref4 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20482-9 – ident: ref36 doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(1994)075<1201:TARMPP>2.0.CO;2 – ident: ref39 doi: 10.2172/1756406 – ident: ref20 doi: 10.5194/acp-18-6259-2018 – ident: ref6 – ident: ref38 doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2017.12.009 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.01.004 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324 – ident: ref35 doi: 10.2172/1246162 – ident: ref42 doi: 10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00359-8 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105809 – ident: ref30 doi: 10.1029/2001JD000785 – ident: ref14 doi: 10.5194/acp-10-10387-2010 – ident: ref32 doi: 10.1080/02786826.2021.1873909 – ident: ref33 doi: 10.5194/acp-19-8817-2019 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00361-6 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.5194/acp-21-5101-2021 – ident: ref40 doi: 10.1080/02786826.2010.482110 – ident: ref23 doi: 10.5194/amt-7-4049-2014 – ident: ref43 doi: 10.1002/2017GL076926 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.5194/amt-15-4569-2022 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1364/AO.21.003011 – ident: ref41 doi: 10.1080/027868290901963 |
SSID | ssj0064172 |
Score | 2.3410826 |
Snippet | Measurement of light absorption of solar radiation by
aerosols is vital for assessing direct aerosol radiative forcing, which
affects local and global climate.... Measurement of light absorption of solar radiation by aerosols is vital for assessing direct aerosol radiative forcing, which affects local and global climate.... |
SourceID | doaj osti proquest gale crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database |
StartPage | 4569 |
SubjectTerms | Absorption Absorption coefficient Absorptivity Accuracy aerosol Aerosol absorption Aerosol concentrations Aerosol light absorption Aerosol particles Aerosols Algorithms angstrom exponent Atmospheric radiation Atmospheric radiation measurements Chemical speciation climate Corrections Data mining Datasets Downward long wave radiation earth sciences Electromagnetic absorption ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Global climate Handbooks Instruments Laboratory experimentation Laboratory experiments Lasers Learning algorithms Light Light absorption Light attenuation Local climates Machine learning Mathematical analysis Measurement Measuring instruments Nephelometers Parameters particle Penetration depth Photometers Radiation Radiation absorption Radiation measurement Radiative forcing Scattering coefficient Size distribution Solar radiation Soot Speciation Urban areas Wavelength |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: ProQuest Technology Collection dbid: 8FG link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Nj9MwELWgXLggPkXZBY0QYsUhapzGSXxCpaIsSEVoWaS9Wc44KZXapDTZ38dfY8Z1W1VIe2w8ThOPPX4znrwR4h3KuNQqqSOVFeMoTWOMrE5p4dXWlqnVFkuOd8y_Z5e_0m836iYE3LqQVrm3id5QuxY5Rj7iA1Kds_fycfMn4qpRfLoaSmjcFw9kQjOJvxSffdlb4iyVvngTc7Yx157cHVMSZklHdt1HUkUEHzRNlCQ52ZY8e__BRg9aWmz_mWq__8wei0cBOMJkp-kn4l7VPBXDOWHedutD4_AepqslAVD_65n4O-XCG8hpzUDIFOolH4xHvG05sBU9RruCFfvmYMuu3XrbAeWS2juwPRAyhEm_bjsmHlgiXDGLgZeZH-OKEPK7LjrwxfiqbQM-6gA_VnbZdMDDB5xcv4DN77ZvyQD7-mGwPt6E_q5xsPZpnRWEOhaL5-J69vl6ehmFcg0REqjso1pmVYxKOh1XeaVqFbsU89pq1OS10FaJqY4d4cPSWcQkrsmP1xV59nEZY6bGL8SgaZvqpYAqQwJyGl1uHfXRts6L2ErtpHW1dm4oRntlGQxU5lxRY2XIpWH1GlKvkcqweg2rdyg-HHpsdjQed8h-Yv0f5JiA219otwsT1rNxyiY4LovYWZXWrigdvZZDx9EhldhyKN7y7DFMsdFwDs_C3nad-frzykxyOc7HtEEVQ3ERhOqWnh9t-CSCRoFZuU4kz08kyQbgSfMZT1JDqImpf5FzpJDeqigk4UnqvJ-7JliozhzX06u7m8_EQx4VjqPL5FwM-u1t9ZqAWF--8avtH9_xNoY priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Correcting for filter-based aerosol light absorption biases at the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement program's Southern Great Plains site using photoacoustic measurements and machine learning |
URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2700971446 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1881355 https://doaj.org/article/d5a2c3b80da54fd8bd7bddcd304252ab |
Volume | 15 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAFT databaseName: Open Access Digital Library customDbUrl: eissn: 1867-8548 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0064172 issn: 1867-8548 databaseCode: KQ8 dateStart: 20080101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 1867-8548 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0064172 issn: 1867-8548 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20080101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVEBS databaseName: EBSCOhost Academic Search Ultimate customDbUrl: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s3936755&profile=ehost&defaultdb=asn eissn: 1867-8548 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0064172 issn: 1867-8548 databaseCode: ABDBF dateStart: 20100501 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.ebscohost.com/direct.asp?db=asn providerName: EBSCOhost – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Continental Europe Database customDbUrl: eissn: 1867-8548 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0064172 issn: 1867-8548 databaseCode: BFMQW dateStart: 20100501 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/conteurope providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 eissn: 1867-8548 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0064172 issn: 1867-8548 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20100501 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Technology Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1867-8548 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0064172 issn: 1867-8548 databaseCode: 8FG dateStart: 20100501 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 providerName: ProQuest |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9NAEF5BuHBBPEVoiUYIUXGw4nW8tveYRg0FKVUVitTbah_eNlJiV7H7-_hrzKydlAgJLhwTj5P1zuzsN7Pjbxj7aHlspEh8JLJiEqVpbCMtU1x4XmuTaqmtoXzH4iI7_5F-uxbXv7X6opqwjh64m7ixEzqxE1PETovUu8K43DhnHYXhItGGvC9uY7tgqvPBWcpD2yZiayOWPd4dUCJaScd600ZcRAgcJJpIkhxsSIG3f--dBzUusz-cdNh55s_Zsx4ywrQb6gv2qKxesuEC0W69DUlx-ASz9QqhZ_j0iv2cUcsNSwXNgJgU_IqOxCPasBzoEodRr2FNUTlo09Tb4DXArPB6A7oFxIQwbTd1Q5QDKwtL4i8IMouHjCL0lV0nDYQ2fOW2gpBvgMu1XlUN0LE0UFn9Ddzd1m2Nrjd0DoPNw4_g31UONqGgs4S-g8XNa3Y1P7uanUd9o4bIIpxsI8-zMraCOxmXeSm8iF1qc6-llRiv4CZpUxk7RIbGaWuT2GMEL0uM6WMT20xM3rBBVVflWwZlZhHCSety7fAeqX1exJpLx7Xz0rkhG--UpWxPYk69NNYKgxlSr0L1Ki4UqVeReofs8_6Ou47A4y-yp6T_vRxRb4cv0CBVb5DqXwY5ZB_IehSRa1RUvXOj75tGff2-VNOcT_IJbk3FkJ30Qr7G8VvdvwyBs0B8XAeSxweSuPrtweUjMlKFeIlIfy1VR1l8qqLgiCTx5p3tqt43NYpKDWROeYB3_-N5j9hTmjvKs_PkmA3a7X35HoFaa0bscTH_MmJPTs8uLpejsEJ_AYg7Q1s |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V3NbtNAEF6V9AAX_hGhBUYIWnFwYzv-2wOHNBAltKmgBNHbar1rh4jEDrEjBO_EM_AGPBMzGztRQOqtB46JZ5PsZH6-mZ2dYey5cuyY-25q-UHUtjzPVpbkHipeKmXsSS5VTPmO4VnQ_-i9vfAvdtjP-i4MlVXWNtEYap0rypG36ICUhxS9VBWUJ8n3bxifFa8Gr_HPfOG6vTejbt-qRghYCoFOaaVOkNjKdzS3kzDxU9_WngpTyRVHJI3mW3nc1ohZYi2Vcu0UY0ueYLRpx7YKaCKEezD_atGQKjrMrSZ2XGO7UcAju8F2j3vD959q0x94jpkWRU3iqLmfszoXRZDkteSstBzfQrzCUTJdd8sPmnEBa6fQyFG7__ENxuH1brHfNatWdS5fjpZlfKR-_NVF8r_h5W12s4Le0Fnpyh22k2R3WXOIUUO-MIcLcADd6QQhvHl1j_3q0ugSRYXhgNge0gmVFljk-DXIBPmaT2FK2Q2QcZEvjPWFeILPC5AlILaGTjnLC2rdMFFwTn0gDM1wk5mFqkLusAAzzjBZZGDyNvBuKidZAbQLoOsJY5h_zsscXZiZwAazzYfg12UaZqYwNoFqEsj4PhtdBYcfsEaWZ8lDBkmgEApzpUOpcQ2XaRjZ0uHakTrlWjdZq5Y-oapm8DSTZCowKCR5FSivwvEFyasgeW2yl-sV81UjlEtoj0mg13TUwty8kS_GorKIQvvSVe04srX0vVRHscZtaaUpv-a7Mm6yZ6QOgpqUZFQFNZbLohCDD-eiEzrtsI0uPmqyw4oozfH3K1ldKkEuUF-zLcr9LUq0omrr8R5pnUDcSc2TFVWZKdxVFDmIyHFxrUiisvGF2GjRo8sfP2XX-6PhqTgdnJ3ssRvEITqVcNx91igXy-QxwtoyflIZE2DiirXwD1iSuHg |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V1Lb9NAEF5VqYS48EaEFhghoOLgxnb82gNCaUrUUlKVUkRvq_XuOkQkdohdIfhnnPgf_BpmNnaigNRbDxyTnU3iyTy-mZ2dYeyZ8tyUh37mhFHSdYLAVY7kASpeJmUaSC5VSvmO4XF08DF4ex6eb7CfzV0YKqtsbKI11LpQlCPv0AEpjyl66WR1WcTJ_uD17KtDE6TopLUZp7EQkSPz_RuGb-Wrw338r5_7_uDNWf_AqScMOApxUOVkXmRcFXqauyY2YRa6OlBxJrniCLTRuquAuxohTaqlUr6bYejJDQajbuqqiAZGoPXfTCJEqC22uTcYvv_UuIEo8OzkKGoYR43-vMUZKQKmoCOnleOFDmIXjlLq-2s-0Y4OWDqIVoGa_o-fsM5vcJP9bti2qHn5sntRpbvqx18dJf9Lvt5iN2pIDr2FDt1mGya_w9pDjCaKuT10gBfQn4wR2ttXd9mvPo00UVQwDoj5IRtTyYFDgECDNMjjYgITynqATMtibq0ypGNcL0FWgJgbetW0KKmlw1jBKfWHsDTDVcYW6sq5nRLsmEMzz8Hmc-BkIsd5CcQ0oGsLI5h9LqoCXZudzAbT1Yfg1-UaprZg1kA9IWR0j51dBTvvs1Ze5OYBAxMphMhc6Vhq3MNlFieu9Lj2pM641m3WaSRRqLpJPM0qmQgMFkl2Bcqu8EJBsitIdtvs5XLHbNEg5RLaPRLuJR21NrdvFPORqC2l0KH0VTdNXC3DINNJqvGxtNKUdwt9mbbZU1INQc1LchLXkbwoS3H44VT0Yq8bd9H1J222UxNlBf5-JevLJsgF6ne2Rrm9RonWVa0tb5EGCsSj1FRZUfWZwqdKEg-ROm5ulErUtr8UK416ePnyE3YNVU28Ozw-2mLXiUF0WOH526xVzS_MI0S7Vfq4tivAxBVr3B-sZcE3 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correcting+for+filter-based+aerosol+light+absorption+biases+at+the+Atmospheric+Radiation+Measurement+program%27s+Southern+Great+Plains+site+using+photoacoustic+measurements+and+machine+learning&rft.jtitle=Atmospheric+measurement+techniques&rft.au=Kumar%2C+Joshin&rft.au=Paik%2C+Theo&rft.au=Shetty%2C+Nishit+J&rft.au=Sheridan%2C+Patrick&rft.date=2022-08-12&rft.pub=Copernicus+GmbH&rft.issn=1867-1381&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=4569&rft_id=info:doi/10.5194%2Famt-15-4569-2022&rft.externalDBID=ISR&rft.externalDocID=A713734678 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1867-8548&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1867-8548&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1867-8548&client=summon |