Self-activation is a two-edged sword: The effects of I primes on cooperation
Two studies examined the influence of I primes on cooperative behavior. Two contrasting hypotheses were tested, using prosocial allocations (Experiment 1) and behavior in a give-some dilemma (Experiment 2) as dependent variables and assessing subjects’ social value orientation. The self-activation h...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of experimental social psychology Vol. 40; no. 6; pp. 769 - 776 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
San Diego, CA
Elsevier Inc
01.11.2004
Elsevier Academic Press |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0022-1031 1096-0465 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.03.001 |
Cover
Summary: | Two studies examined the influence of
I primes on cooperative behavior. Two contrasting hypotheses were tested, using prosocial allocations (Experiment 1) and behavior in a give-some dilemma (Experiment 2) as dependent variables and assessing subjects’ social value orientation. The self-activation hypothesis (
Verplanken & Holland, 2002) predicts that social value orientation influences behavior to a stronger degree when activated. That is, proselfs should behave less cooperatively, whereas prosocials should behave even more cooperatively in an
I prime condition. The independent self-construal hypothesis (e.g.,
Gardner, Gabriel, & Lee, 1999) predicts a stronger concern for one’s own outcome and less cooperative behavior for individuals with an activated independent self-construal. In both studies an interaction between priming and social value orientation occurred, supporting the self-activation hypothesis. Implications for the importance of social cognitive processes underlying cooperative behavior, as well as, implications for research on independent vs interdependent self-construals are discussed. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0022-1031 1096-0465 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jesp.2004.03.001 |