Current trends in selection of conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting

The procedure of coronary artery bypass grafting continues to be the “gold standard” for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and left main stenosis due to favourable long-term and consistent outcomes despite the advent of new generations of stents. But the targeted better long-term out...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery Vol. 65; no. 10; pp. 549 - 556
Main Authors Carrel, Thierry, Winkler, Bernhard
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Tokyo Springer Japan 01.10.2017
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1863-6705
1863-6713
1863-6713
DOI10.1007/s11748-017-0807-8

Cover

More Information
Summary:The procedure of coronary artery bypass grafting continues to be the “gold standard” for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease and left main stenosis due to favourable long-term and consistent outcomes despite the advent of new generations of stents. But the targeted better long-term outcome of surgical revascularization over percutaneous interventions depends on several variables and aspects; one of them is the choice of conduits used to bypass the stenosed arteries. Coronary artery bypass surgery has been studied and debated for decades and the same applies to the selection of grafts. Current data provide significant benefits for patients who receive full arterial revascularization using both internal thoracic arteries and, if applicable, the radial artery. Unfortunately, the use of multiple arterial grafts is still not performed widely despite the evidence of superiority over multiple saphenous vein grafts that are still the most used grafts in cardiovascular procedures. In this review article, we present current trends and evidences for graft selection and give an overview of controversial data regarding the comparison of the radial artery and saphenous vein. Additionally, few words are spelt on alternative conduits.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:1863-6705
1863-6713
1863-6713
DOI:10.1007/s11748-017-0807-8