Optimal Analysis of Left Atrial Strain by Speckle Tracking Echocardiography: P-wave versus R-wave Trigger

Background Left atrial (LA) strain analysis using speckle tracking echocardiography is useful for assessing LA function. However, there is no established procedure for this method. Most investigators have determined the electrocardiographic R‐wave peak as the starting point for LA strain analysis. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEchocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) Vol. 32; no. 8; pp. 1241 - 1249
Main Authors Hayashi, Shuji, Yamada, Hirotsugu, Bando, Mika, Saijo, Yoshihito, Nishio, Susumu, Hirata, Yukina, Klein, Allan L., Sata, Masataka
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0742-2822
1540-8175
1540-8175
DOI10.1111/echo.12834

Cover

Abstract Background Left atrial (LA) strain analysis using speckle tracking echocardiography is useful for assessing LA function. However, there is no established procedure for this method. Most investigators have determined the electrocardiographic R‐wave peak as the starting point for LA strain analysis. To test our hypothesis that P‐wave onset should be used as the starting point, we measured LA strain using 2 different starting points and compared the strain values with the corresponding LA volume indices obtained by three‐dimensional (3D) echocardiography. Methods We enrolled 78 subjects (61 ± 17 years, 25 males) with and without various cardiac diseases in this study and assessed global longitudinal LA strain by two‐dimensional speckle tracking strain echocardiography using EchoPac software. We used either R‐wave peak or P‐wave onset as the starting point for determining LA strains during the reservoir (Rres, Pres), conduit (Rcon, Pcon), and booster pump (Rpump, Ppump) phases. We determined the maximum, minimum, and preatrial contraction LA volumes, and calculated the LA total, passive, and active emptying fractions using 3D echocardiography. Results The correlation between Pres and LA total emptying fraction was better than the correlation between Rres and LA total emptying fraction (r = 0.458 vs. 0.308, P = 0.026). Pcon and Ppump exhibited better correlation with the corresponding 3D echocardiographic parameters than Rcon (r = 0.560 vs. 0.479, P = 0.133) and Rpump (r = 0.577 vs. 0.345, P = 0.003), respectively. Conclusions LA strain in any phase should be analyzed using P‐wave onset as the starting point rather than R‐wave peak.
AbstractList Left atrial (LA) strain analysis using speckle tracking echocardiography is useful for assessing LA function. However, there is no established procedure for this method. Most investigators have determined the electrocardiographic R-wave peak as the starting point for LA strain analysis. To test our hypothesis that P-wave onset should be used as the starting point, we measured LA strain using 2 different starting points and compared the strain values with the corresponding LA volume indices obtained by three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography. We enrolled 78 subjects (61 ± 17 years, 25 males) with and without various cardiac diseases in this study and assessed global longitudinal LA strain by two-dimensional speckle tracking strain echocardiography using EchoPac software. We used either R-wave peak or P-wave onset as the starting point for determining LA strains during the reservoir (Rres, Pres), conduit (Rcon, Pcon), and booster pump (Rpump, Ppump) phases. We determined the maximum, minimum, and preatrial contraction LA volumes, and calculated the LA total, passive, and active emptying fractions using 3D echocardiography. The correlation between Pres and LA total emptying fraction was better than the correlation between Rres and LA total emptying fraction (r = 0.458 vs. 0.308, P = 0.026). Pcon and Ppump exhibited better correlation with the corresponding 3D echocardiographic parameters than Rcon (r = 0.560 vs. 0.479, P = 0.133) and Rpump (r = 0.577 vs. 0.345, P = 0.003), respectively. LA strain in any phase should be analyzed using P-wave onset as the starting point rather than R-wave peak.
Left atrial (LA) strain analysis using speckle tracking echocardiography is useful for assessing LA function. However, there is no established procedure for this method. Most investigators have determined the electrocardiographic R-wave peak as the starting point for LA strain analysis. To test our hypothesis that P-wave onset should be used as the starting point, we measured LA strain using 2 different starting points and compared the strain values with the corresponding LA volume indices obtained by three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography.BACKGROUNDLeft atrial (LA) strain analysis using speckle tracking echocardiography is useful for assessing LA function. However, there is no established procedure for this method. Most investigators have determined the electrocardiographic R-wave peak as the starting point for LA strain analysis. To test our hypothesis that P-wave onset should be used as the starting point, we measured LA strain using 2 different starting points and compared the strain values with the corresponding LA volume indices obtained by three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography.We enrolled 78 subjects (61 ± 17 years, 25 males) with and without various cardiac diseases in this study and assessed global longitudinal LA strain by two-dimensional speckle tracking strain echocardiography using EchoPac software. We used either R-wave peak or P-wave onset as the starting point for determining LA strains during the reservoir (Rres, Pres), conduit (Rcon, Pcon), and booster pump (Rpump, Ppump) phases. We determined the maximum, minimum, and preatrial contraction LA volumes, and calculated the LA total, passive, and active emptying fractions using 3D echocardiography.METHODSWe enrolled 78 subjects (61 ± 17 years, 25 males) with and without various cardiac diseases in this study and assessed global longitudinal LA strain by two-dimensional speckle tracking strain echocardiography using EchoPac software. We used either R-wave peak or P-wave onset as the starting point for determining LA strains during the reservoir (Rres, Pres), conduit (Rcon, Pcon), and booster pump (Rpump, Ppump) phases. We determined the maximum, minimum, and preatrial contraction LA volumes, and calculated the LA total, passive, and active emptying fractions using 3D echocardiography.The correlation between Pres and LA total emptying fraction was better than the correlation between Rres and LA total emptying fraction (r = 0.458 vs. 0.308, P = 0.026). Pcon and Ppump exhibited better correlation with the corresponding 3D echocardiographic parameters than Rcon (r = 0.560 vs. 0.479, P = 0.133) and Rpump (r = 0.577 vs. 0.345, P = 0.003), respectively.RESULTSThe correlation between Pres and LA total emptying fraction was better than the correlation between Rres and LA total emptying fraction (r = 0.458 vs. 0.308, P = 0.026). Pcon and Ppump exhibited better correlation with the corresponding 3D echocardiographic parameters than Rcon (r = 0.560 vs. 0.479, P = 0.133) and Rpump (r = 0.577 vs. 0.345, P = 0.003), respectively.LA strain in any phase should be analyzed using P-wave onset as the starting point rather than R-wave peak.CONCLUSIONSLA strain in any phase should be analyzed using P-wave onset as the starting point rather than R-wave peak.
Background Left atrial (LA) strain analysis using speckle tracking echocardiography is useful for assessing LA function. However, there is no established procedure for this method. Most investigators have determined the electrocardiographic R‐wave peak as the starting point for LA strain analysis. To test our hypothesis that P‐wave onset should be used as the starting point, we measured LA strain using 2 different starting points and compared the strain values with the corresponding LA volume indices obtained by three‐dimensional (3D) echocardiography. Methods We enrolled 78 subjects (61 ± 17 years, 25 males) with and without various cardiac diseases in this study and assessed global longitudinal LA strain by two‐dimensional speckle tracking strain echocardiography using EchoPac software. We used either R‐wave peak or P‐wave onset as the starting point for determining LA strains during the reservoir (Rres, Pres), conduit (Rcon, Pcon), and booster pump (Rpump, Ppump) phases. We determined the maximum, minimum, and preatrial contraction LA volumes, and calculated the LA total, passive, and active emptying fractions using 3D echocardiography. Results The correlation between Pres and LA total emptying fraction was better than the correlation between Rres and LA total emptying fraction (r = 0.458 vs. 0.308, P = 0.026). Pcon and Ppump exhibited better correlation with the corresponding 3D echocardiographic parameters than Rcon (r = 0.560 vs. 0.479, P = 0.133) and Rpump (r = 0.577 vs. 0.345, P = 0.003), respectively. Conclusions LA strain in any phase should be analyzed using P‐wave onset as the starting point rather than R‐wave peak.
Author Nishio, Susumu
Saijo, Yoshihito
Hayashi, Shuji
Bando, Mika
Sata, Masataka
Hirata, Yukina
Klein, Allan L.
Yamada, Hirotsugu
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Shuji
  surname: Hayashi
  fullname: Hayashi, Shuji
  organization: Ultrasound Examination Center, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Hirotsugu
  surname: Yamada
  fullname: Yamada, Hirotsugu
  email: Address for correspondence and reprint requests: Hirotsugu Yamada, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokushima University Hospital, 2-50-1 Kuramoto, Tokushima 770-8504, Japan. Fax: +81-88-633-7798;, yamadah@tokushima-u.ac.jp
  organization: Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Mika
  surname: Bando
  fullname: Bando, Mika
  organization: Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Yoshihito
  surname: Saijo
  fullname: Saijo, Yoshihito
  organization: Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Susumu
  surname: Nishio
  fullname: Nishio, Susumu
  organization: Ultrasound Examination Center, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Yukina
  surname: Hirata
  fullname: Hirata, Yukina
  organization: Ultrasound Examination Center, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Allan L.
  surname: Klein
  fullname: Klein, Allan L.
  organization: Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, Cleveland
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Masataka
  surname: Sata
  fullname: Sata, Masataka
  organization: Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tokushima University Hospital, Tokushima, Japan
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25363348$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kF1P2zAUhq2JaRTGDT8A-RJNCvNX4oS7quooUkWntRMSN5bjnBTTNAl2Csu_n0uACzTNN0c-et5zjp4jdFA3NSB0SskFDe87mPvmgrKUi09oRGNBopTK-ACNiBQsYiljh-jI-wdCiKRUfEGHLOYJ5yIdIbtoO7vVFR7Xuuq99bgp8RzKDo87Z0N_2Tlta5z3eNmC2VSAV06bja3XeBr2Gu0K26ydbu_7S_wzetZPgJ_A-Z3Hv4bfytn1GtxX9LnUlYeT13qMfv-YriazaL64up6M55GJCReREQBcC6aZFqBZHCdFmWd5OFxSEIRnJjUlITnkRSlKzWUii5zQrCgyzUQu-TE6H-a2rnncge_U1noDVaVraHZe0SRLwyLOaEDPXtFdvoVCtS6ocL160xOAbwNgXOO9g_IdoUTt3au9e_XiPsDkA2xspzvb1HuF1b8jdIg82wr6_wxX08ls8ZaJhoz1Hfx5z2i3UYnkMla3N1dqNr-VbMlv1B3_CyVMpd4
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s10554_020_01970_x
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics10110946
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12872_024_04047_y
crossref_primary_10_1097_HCO_0000000000000537
crossref_primary_10_1111_echo_15753
crossref_primary_10_1111_echo_14026
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvc_2020_04_003
crossref_primary_10_1111_echo_14140
crossref_primary_10_12996_gmj_2024_4023
crossref_primary_10_1111_echo_14956
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_echo_2016_07_011
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12872_023_03253_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvc_2021_03_004
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12947_018_0147_6
crossref_primary_10_1002_ehf2_14094
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_echo_2019_11_004
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12574_016_0283_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00380_020_01594_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10554_018_1502_2
crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10034_1115
crossref_primary_10_1111_echo_13101
crossref_primary_10_1111_echo_13860
crossref_primary_10_1253_circj_CJ_21_0373
crossref_primary_10_1111_echo_14174
crossref_primary_10_1536_ihj_22_659
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12574_017_0329_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijcard_2021_06_038
crossref_primary_10_1002_jcu_22548
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_22395
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.05.011
10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.02.018
10.1093/ejechocard/jeq175
10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.023
10.3758/BF03193146
10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02864-3
10.1016/j.echo.2013.02.014
10.1016/j.echo.2013.12.016
10.1093/eurheartj/ehq005
10.1253/circj.CJ-12-0264
10.1186/1476-7120-10-4
10.1016/j.echo.2009.11.003
10.1016/j.echo.2011.03.009
10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.05.031
10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.077
10.1093/ejechocard/jer066
10.1007/s10554-012-0127-0
10.1016/j.echo.2011.01.015
10.1111/echo.12366
10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.060
10.1111/j.1540-8175.2009.00955.x
10.1016/j.echo.2009.04.026
10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.12.028
10.1016/j.echo.2014.01.021
10.1093/ehjci/jes174
10.1046/j.1540-8167.2004.03625.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2014, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2014, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
DBID BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1111/echo.12834
DatabaseName Istex
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1540-8175
EndPage 1249
ExternalDocumentID 25363348
10_1111_echo_12834
ECHO12834
ark_67375_WNG_HLW72S3N_Z
Genre article
Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: JSPS KAKENHI
  funderid: 22500437
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.GJ
.Y3
04C
05W
0R~
10A
1OB
1OC
29G
31~
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5GY
5HH
5LA
5RE
5VS
66C
6PF
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAWTL
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABDBF
ABEML
ABJNI
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACUHS
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOJX
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEGXH
AEIGN
AEIMD
AEUYR
AEYWJ
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGYGG
AHBTC
AHEFC
AIACR
AIQQE
AITYG
AIURR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMSDO
BMXJE
BPMNR
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBC
EBD
EBS
ECF
ECT
ECV
EIHBH
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ENC
EPT
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
FZ0
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
PALCI
Q.N
Q11
QB0
Q~Q
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TUS
UB1
V8K
V9Y
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WOW
WQ9
WQJ
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
ZGI
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAHHS
ACCFJ
ADZOD
AEEZP
AEQDE
AEUQT
AFPWT
AIWBW
AJBDE
WRC
WUP
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c5034-c4ee3a42a2a4ea2556dfb9b71171e4039c8cf00bebdf4fa3767db019dd9a24b73
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0742-2822
1540-8175
IngestDate Fri Sep 05 09:08:26 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:55:38 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:58:43 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 04:18:10 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:59:10 EST 2025
Sun Sep 21 06:18:51 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 8
Keywords strain
three-dimensional echocardiography
two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography
left atrium
Language English
License http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
2014, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5034-c4ee3a42a2a4ea2556dfb9b71171e4039c8cf00bebdf4fa3767db019dd9a24b73
Notes JSPS KAKENHI - No. 22500437
ark:/67375/WNG-HLW72S3N-Z
ArticleID:ECHO12834
istex:3E717D8B61587409C7CA838A9044EBA73AF0AB64
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
PMID 25363348
PQID 1698034321
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1698034321
pubmed_primary_25363348
crossref_primary_10_1111_echo_12834
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_echo_12834
wiley_primary_10_1111_echo_12834_ECHO12834
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_HLW72S3N_Z
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate August 2015
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2015
  text: August 2015
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.)
PublicationTitleAlternate Echocardiography
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
References Miyasaka Y, Tsujimoto S, Maeba H, et al: Left atrial volume by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: Validation by 64-slice multidetector computed tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011;24:680-686.
Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al: Recommendations for chamber quantification: A report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005;18:1440-1463.
Cameli M, Lisi M, Righini FM, et al: Novel echocardiographic techniques to assess left atrial size, anatomy and function. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2012;10:4.
Motoki H, Alraies MC, Dahiya A, et al: Changes in left atrial mechanics following pericardiectomy for pericardial constriction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013;26:640-648.
Takemoto Y, Barnes ME, Seward JB, et al: Usefulness of left atrial volume in predicting first congestive heart failure in patients > or = 65 years of age with well-preserved left ventricular systolic function. Am J Cardiol 2005;96:832-836.
Wakami K, Ohte N, Asada K, et al: Correlation between left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and peak left atrial wall strain during left ventricular systole. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009;22:847-851.
Todaro MC, Choudhuri I, Belohlavek M, et al: New echocardiographic techniques for evaluation of left atrial mechanics. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;13:973-984.
Delgado V, Vidal B, Sitges M, et al: Fate of left atrial function as determined by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography study after radiofrequency catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 2008;101:1285-1290.
Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC, et al: Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009;22:107-133.
Buechel RR, Sommer G, Leibundgut G, et al: Assessment of left atrial functional parameters using a novel dedicated analysis tool for real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: Validation in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;29:601-608.
Vieira MJ, Teixeira R, Goncalves L, et al: Left atrial mechanics: Echocardiographic assessment and clinical implications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014;27:463-478.
Blume GG, McLeod CJ, Barnes ME, et al: Left atrial function: Physiology, assessment, and clinical implications. Eur J Echocardiogr 2011;12:421-430.
Kim DG, Lee KJ, Lee S, et al: Feasibility of two-dimensional global longitudinal strain and strain rate imaging for the assessment of left atrial function: A study in subjects with a low probability of cardiovascular disease and normal exercise capacity. Echocardiography 2009;26:1179-1187.
Mor-Avi V, Lang RM, Badano LP, et al: Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011;24:277-313.
To AC, Flamm SD, Marwick TH, et al: Clinical utility of multimodality LA imaging: Assessment of size, function, and structure. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:788-798.
Tops LF, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ: Imaging and atrial fibrillation: The role of multimodality imaging in patient evaluation and management of atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2010;31:542-551.
Tsang TS, Abhayaratna WP, Barnes ME, et al: Prediction of cardiovascular outcomes with left atrial size: Is volume superior to area or diameter? J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1018-1023.
Takigiku K, Takeuchi M, Izumi C, et al: Normal range of left ventricular 2-dimensional strain: Japanese Ultrasound Speckle Tracking of the Left Ventricle (JUSTICE) study. Circ J 2012;76:2623-2632.
Tsang TS, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, et al: Left atrial volume as a morphophysiologic expression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and relation to cardiovascular risk burden. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:1284-1289.
Vieira-Filho NG, Mancuso FJ, Oliveira WA, et al: Simplified single plane echocardiography is comparable to conventional biplane two-dimensional echocardiography in the evaluation of left atrial volume: A study validated by three-dimensional echocardiography in 143 individuals. Echocardiography 2014;31:265-272.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, et al: G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007;39:175-191.
Matsumoto K, Tanaka H, Imanishi J, et al: Preliminary observations of prognostic value of left atrial functional reserve during dobutamine infusion in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014;27:430-439.
Mor-Avi V, Yodwut C, Jenkins C, et al: Real-time 3D echocardiographic quantification of left atrial volume: Multicenter study for validation with CMR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:769-777.
Saraiva RM, Demirkol S, Buakhamsri A, et al: Left atrial strain measured by two-dimensional speckle tracking represents a new tool to evaluate left atrial function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010;23:172-180.
Rohner A, Brinkert M, Kawel N, et al: Functional assessment of the left atrium by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography using a novel dedicated analysis tool: Initial validation studies in comparison with computed tomography. Eur J Echocardiogr 2011;12:497-505.
Bang CN, Dalsgaard M, Greve AM, et al: Left atrial size and function as predictors of new-onset of atrial fibrillation in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis: The simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis study. Int J Cardiol 2013;168:2322-2327.
2010; 23
2007; 39
2009; 22
2013; 29
2010; 31
2013; 26
2006; 47
2014; 27
2005; 96
2013; 168
2011; 24
2011; 12
2002; 90
2011; 4
2008; 101
2012; 13
2012; 5
2005; 18
2012; 10
2012; 76
2009; 26
2014; 31
e_1_2_6_10_1
e_1_2_6_19_1
e_1_2_6_13_1
e_1_2_6_14_1
e_1_2_6_11_1
e_1_2_6_12_1
e_1_2_6_17_1
e_1_2_6_18_1
e_1_2_6_15_1
e_1_2_6_16_1
e_1_2_6_21_1
e_1_2_6_20_1
e_1_2_6_9_1
e_1_2_6_8_1
e_1_2_6_5_1
e_1_2_6_4_1
e_1_2_6_7_1
e_1_2_6_6_1
e_1_2_6_25_1
e_1_2_6_24_1
e_1_2_6_3_1
e_1_2_6_23_1
e_1_2_6_2_1
e_1_2_6_22_1
e_1_2_6_27_1
e_1_2_6_26_1
References_xml – reference: To AC, Flamm SD, Marwick TH, et al: Clinical utility of multimodality LA imaging: Assessment of size, function, and structure. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4:788-798.
– reference: Saraiva RM, Demirkol S, Buakhamsri A, et al: Left atrial strain measured by two-dimensional speckle tracking represents a new tool to evaluate left atrial function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2010;23:172-180.
– reference: Mor-Avi V, Yodwut C, Jenkins C, et al: Real-time 3D echocardiographic quantification of left atrial volume: Multicenter study for validation with CMR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5:769-777.
– reference: Vieira-Filho NG, Mancuso FJ, Oliveira WA, et al: Simplified single plane echocardiography is comparable to conventional biplane two-dimensional echocardiography in the evaluation of left atrial volume: A study validated by three-dimensional echocardiography in 143 individuals. Echocardiography 2014;31:265-272.
– reference: Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC, et al: Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009;22:107-133.
– reference: Mor-Avi V, Lang RM, Badano LP, et al: Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011;24:277-313.
– reference: Rohner A, Brinkert M, Kawel N, et al: Functional assessment of the left atrium by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography using a novel dedicated analysis tool: Initial validation studies in comparison with computed tomography. Eur J Echocardiogr 2011;12:497-505.
– reference: Wakami K, Ohte N, Asada K, et al: Correlation between left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and peak left atrial wall strain during left ventricular systole. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2009;22:847-851.
– reference: Tops LF, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ: Imaging and atrial fibrillation: The role of multimodality imaging in patient evaluation and management of atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J 2010;31:542-551.
– reference: Miyasaka Y, Tsujimoto S, Maeba H, et al: Left atrial volume by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: Validation by 64-slice multidetector computed tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011;24:680-686.
– reference: Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, et al: G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007;39:175-191.
– reference: Takigiku K, Takeuchi M, Izumi C, et al: Normal range of left ventricular 2-dimensional strain: Japanese Ultrasound Speckle Tracking of the Left Ventricle (JUSTICE) study. Circ J 2012;76:2623-2632.
– reference: Delgado V, Vidal B, Sitges M, et al: Fate of left atrial function as determined by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography study after radiofrequency catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol 2008;101:1285-1290.
– reference: Buechel RR, Sommer G, Leibundgut G, et al: Assessment of left atrial functional parameters using a novel dedicated analysis tool for real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: Validation in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013;29:601-608.
– reference: Vieira MJ, Teixeira R, Goncalves L, et al: Left atrial mechanics: Echocardiographic assessment and clinical implications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014;27:463-478.
– reference: Takemoto Y, Barnes ME, Seward JB, et al: Usefulness of left atrial volume in predicting first congestive heart failure in patients > or = 65 years of age with well-preserved left ventricular systolic function. Am J Cardiol 2005;96:832-836.
– reference: Cameli M, Lisi M, Righini FM, et al: Novel echocardiographic techniques to assess left atrial size, anatomy and function. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2012;10:4.
– reference: Blume GG, McLeod CJ, Barnes ME, et al: Left atrial function: Physiology, assessment, and clinical implications. Eur J Echocardiogr 2011;12:421-430.
– reference: Tsang TS, Abhayaratna WP, Barnes ME, et al: Prediction of cardiovascular outcomes with left atrial size: Is volume superior to area or diameter? J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1018-1023.
– reference: Kim DG, Lee KJ, Lee S, et al: Feasibility of two-dimensional global longitudinal strain and strain rate imaging for the assessment of left atrial function: A study in subjects with a low probability of cardiovascular disease and normal exercise capacity. Echocardiography 2009;26:1179-1187.
– reference: Bang CN, Dalsgaard M, Greve AM, et al: Left atrial size and function as predictors of new-onset of atrial fibrillation in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis: The simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis study. Int J Cardiol 2013;168:2322-2327.
– reference: Todaro MC, Choudhuri I, Belohlavek M, et al: New echocardiographic techniques for evaluation of left atrial mechanics. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;13:973-984.
– reference: Motoki H, Alraies MC, Dahiya A, et al: Changes in left atrial mechanics following pericardiectomy for pericardial constriction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2013;26:640-648.
– reference: Tsang TS, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, et al: Left atrial volume as a morphophysiologic expression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and relation to cardiovascular risk burden. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:1284-1289.
– reference: Matsumoto K, Tanaka H, Imanishi J, et al: Preliminary observations of prognostic value of left atrial functional reserve during dobutamine infusion in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014;27:430-439.
– reference: Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al: Recommendations for chamber quantification: A report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005;18:1440-1463.
– volume: 27
  start-page: 430
  year: 2014
  end-page: 439
  article-title: Preliminary observations of prognostic value of left atrial functional reserve during dobutamine infusion in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
– volume: 13
  start-page: 973
  year: 2012
  end-page: 984
  article-title: New echocardiographic techniques for evaluation of left atrial mechanics
  publication-title: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging
– volume: 96
  start-page: 832
  year: 2005
  end-page: 836
  article-title: Usefulness of left atrial volume in predicting first congestive heart failure in patients > or = 65 years of age with well‐preserved left ventricular systolic function
  publication-title: Am J Cardiol
– volume: 24
  start-page: 680
  year: 2011
  end-page: 686
  article-title: Left atrial volume by real‐time three‐dimensional echocardiography: Validation by 64‐slice multidetector computed tomography
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
– volume: 101
  start-page: 1285
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1290
  article-title: Fate of left atrial function as determined by real‐time three‐dimensional echocardiography study after radiofrequency catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation
  publication-title: Am J Cardiol
– volume: 90
  start-page: 1284
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1289
  article-title: Left atrial volume as a morphophysiologic expression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and relation to cardiovascular risk burden
  publication-title: Am J Cardiol
– volume: 31
  start-page: 265
  year: 2014
  end-page: 272
  article-title: Simplified single plane echocardiography is comparable to conventional biplane two‐dimensional echocardiography in the evaluation of left atrial volume: A study validated by three‐dimensional echocardiography in 143 individuals
  publication-title: Echocardiography
– volume: 23
  start-page: 172
  year: 2010
  end-page: 180
  article-title: Left atrial strain measured by two‐dimensional speckle tracking represents a new tool to evaluate left atrial function
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
– volume: 47
  start-page: 1018
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1023
  article-title: Prediction of cardiovascular outcomes with left atrial size: Is volume superior to area or diameter?
  publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol
– volume: 12
  start-page: 421
  year: 2011
  end-page: 430
  article-title: Left atrial function: Physiology, assessment, and clinical implications
  publication-title: Eur J Echocardiogr
– volume: 26
  start-page: 640
  year: 2013
  end-page: 648
  article-title: Changes in left atrial mechanics following pericardiectomy for pericardial constriction
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1440
  year: 2005
  end-page: 1463
  article-title: Recommendations for chamber quantification: A report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
– volume: 12
  start-page: 497
  year: 2011
  end-page: 505
  article-title: Functional assessment of the left atrium by real‐time three‐dimensional echocardiography using a novel dedicated analysis tool: Initial validation studies in comparison with computed tomography
  publication-title: Eur J Echocardiogr
– volume: 22
  start-page: 107
  year: 2009
  end-page: 133
  article-title: Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
– volume: 29
  start-page: 601
  year: 2013
  end-page: 608
  article-title: Assessment of left atrial functional parameters using a novel dedicated analysis tool for real‐time three‐dimensional echocardiography: Validation in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging
  publication-title: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
– volume: 27
  start-page: 463
  year: 2014
  end-page: 478
  article-title: Left atrial mechanics: Echocardiographic assessment and clinical implications
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1179
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1187
  article-title: Feasibility of two‐dimensional global longitudinal strain and strain rate imaging for the assessment of left atrial function: A study in subjects with a low probability of cardiovascular disease and normal exercise capacity
  publication-title: Echocardiography
– volume: 4
  start-page: 788
  year: 2011
  end-page: 798
  article-title: Clinical utility of multimodality LA imaging: Assessment of size, function, and structure
  publication-title: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
– volume: 168
  start-page: 2322
  year: 2013
  end-page: 2327
  article-title: Left atrial size and function as predictors of new‐onset of atrial fibrillation in patients with asymptomatic aortic stenosis: The simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis study
  publication-title: Int J Cardiol
– volume: 10
  start-page: 4
  year: 2012
  article-title: Novel echocardiographic techniques to assess left atrial size, anatomy and function
  publication-title: Cardiovasc Ultrasound
– volume: 39
  start-page: 175
  year: 2007
  end-page: 191
  article-title: G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences
  publication-title: Behav Res Methods
– volume: 31
  start-page: 542
  year: 2010
  end-page: 551
  article-title: Imaging and atrial fibrillation: The role of multimodality imaging in patient evaluation and management of atrial fibrillation
  publication-title: Eur Heart J
– volume: 24
  start-page: 277
  year: 2011
  end-page: 313
  article-title: Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
– volume: 22
  start-page: 847
  year: 2009
  end-page: 851
  article-title: Correlation between left ventricular end‐diastolic pressure and peak left atrial wall strain during left ventricular systole
  publication-title: J Am Soc Echocardiogr
– volume: 5
  start-page: 769
  year: 2012
  end-page: 777
  article-title: Real‐time 3D echocardiographic quantification of left atrial volume: Multicenter study for validation with CMR
  publication-title: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
– volume: 76
  start-page: 2623
  year: 2012
  end-page: 2632
  article-title: Normal range of left ventricular 2‐dimensional strain: Japanese Ultrasound Speckle Tracking of the Left Ventricle (JUSTICE) study
  publication-title: Circ J
– ident: e_1_2_6_18_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.05.011
– ident: e_1_2_6_16_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.02.018
– ident: e_1_2_6_5_1
  doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jeq175
– ident: e_1_2_6_24_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2008.11.023
– ident: e_1_2_6_26_1
  doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02864-3
– ident: e_1_2_6_15_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.02.014
– ident: e_1_2_6_13_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.12.016
– ident: e_1_2_6_20_1
  doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq005
– ident: e_1_2_6_27_1
  doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-12-0264
– ident: e_1_2_6_8_1
  doi: 10.1186/1476-7120-10-4
– ident: e_1_2_6_14_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.11.003
– ident: e_1_2_6_22_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.03.009
– ident: e_1_2_6_4_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.05.031
– ident: e_1_2_6_3_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.08.077
– ident: e_1_2_6_21_1
  doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jer066
– ident: e_1_2_6_19_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10554-012-0127-0
– ident: e_1_2_6_7_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.01.015
– ident: e_1_2_6_17_1
  doi: 10.1111/echo.12366
– ident: e_1_2_6_6_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.01.060
– ident: e_1_2_6_12_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2009.00955.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_11_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.04.026
– ident: e_1_2_6_25_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.12.028
– ident: e_1_2_6_10_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.01.021
– ident: e_1_2_6_9_1
  doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jes174
– ident: e_1_2_6_23_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2004.03625.x
SSID ssj0007114
Score 2.2381783
Snippet Background Left atrial (LA) strain analysis using speckle tracking echocardiography is useful for assessing LA function. However, there is no established...
Left atrial (LA) strain analysis using speckle tracking echocardiography is useful for assessing LA function. However, there is no established procedure for...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
istex
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1241
SubjectTerms Cardiac-Gated Imaging Techniques - methods
Echocardiography - methods
Elastic Modulus
Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods
Female
Heart Atria - diagnostic imaging
Heart Atria - physiopathology
Humans
Image Enhancement - methods
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
left atrium
Male
Middle Aged
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
strain
three-dimensional echocardiography
two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - diagnostic imaging
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology
Title Optimal Analysis of Left Atrial Strain by Speckle Tracking Echocardiography: P-wave versus R-wave Trigger
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-HLW72S3N-Z/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fecho.12834
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25363348
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1698034321
Volume 32
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVEBS
  databaseName: EBSCOhost Academic Search Ultimate
  customDbUrl: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?authtype=ip,shib&custid=s3936755&profile=ehost&defaultdb=asn
  eissn: 1540-8175
  dateEnd: 20241001
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0007114
  issn: 0742-2822
  databaseCode: ABDBF
  dateStart: 20030101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.ebscohost.com/direct.asp?db=asn
  providerName: EBSCOhost
– providerCode: PRVWIB
  databaseName: Wiley Online Library - Core collection (SURFmarket)
  issn: 0742-2822
  databaseCode: DR2
  dateStart: 19970101
  customDbUrl:
  isFulltext: true
  eissn: 1540-8175
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: false
  ssIdentifier: ssj0007114
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3ra9RAEB9KBfGLb220yhZFUMiRZHezF_FLKdce0l6lD1oEWfZZ5No7uYdVP_kn-Df6l7izSa5WiqDfEpgku7M7j-zM_AbgeZF7y7jjqfGcpqzLg0gZUaVClaUSTHEasTt3BmX_kL095sdL8KathanxIRYHbigZUV-jgCs9_U3IXVAPnaBdKYKB5pTHGO3eBXaUyGtgb4H1J8EMNtikmMZz8egla3QNGfvlKlfzsucaTc_mLfjQDrrOOBl25jPdMd_-wHP831ndhpuNT0rW6010B5bc6C5c32mi7vfgbDfolTOkaBBMyNiTbednZD02_SD7sdEE0V8JtrMfnjoSTKDBQ3jSC18yMee1hsZ-Td79_P7jXH12BBNC5lOy194fTD6enLjJfTjc7B1s9NOmTUNqeEZZaphzVLFCFYo5hZBm1utKB_6L3LGMVqZrfJZpp61nXiF8jNXBs7S2UgXTgj6A5dF45FaA6IxaayrvgiPEKq-q0puup6IwhdWlFgm8bJdLmgbDHGd4Ktt_GeSfjPxL4NmC9lON3HEl1Yu46gsSNRlirpvg8miwJfvbR6LYpwP5PoG1dlvIIIEYVlEjN55PZV5W3Qzrc_MEHtb7ZfG2gtMSa50TeBVX_S8jkb2N_m68evQvxI_hRvDheJ2TuArLs8ncPQl-0kw_jfLwC8TRD70
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Zb9QwEB5BK0FfuCnhNAIhUSmrJLbjDW9V2RJgd4varVrxYtmOXaFtd9EeXE_8BH4jvwSPk91SVCHBWyJNLo_niP3NNwBPs9RVjFseG8dpzNrcm5QRRSxUnivBFKeBu7PXz8t99uaQHzbYHKyFqfkhlgtuaBnBX6OB44L0b1ZuvX9oefdK2UVYxQ06tMuXu6fsUSKtqb0FVqD4QNiwkyKQ5_TaM_FoFYf2y3nJ5tncNQSf7at1h9Vp4CxEzMmwNZ_plvn2B6Pjf3_XNbjSpKVks55H1-GCHd2AS71m4_0mnOx413KCEg2JCRk70rVuRjZD3w-yF3pNEP2VYEf74bElPgoaXIcnHf8kE2CvNTv2C_Lu5_cfn9UnSxATMp-S3cX5YPLh6MhObsH-dmewVcZNp4bY8ISy2DBrqWKZyhSzClnNKqcL7RUgUssSWpi2cUmira4ccwoZZCrtk8uqKlTGtKC3YWU0Htk7QHRCq8oUzvpciBVOFbkzbUdFZrJK51pE8HyhL2kaGnP8wmO5-J3B8ZNh_CJ4spT9WJN3nCv1LKh9KaImQ4S7CS4P-q9k2T0Q2R7ty_cRPF7MC-mNEHdW1MiO51OZ5kU7wRLdNIL1esIs75ZxmmO5cwQbQe1_eRPZ2Sp3wtHdfxF-BJfLQa8ru6_7b-_Bmk_peA1RvA8rs8ncPvBp00w_DMbxC6jIE9k
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bSxwxFD5YBelLb_YyvZlSKbQwy8wkmexIX0R33bbrKl5QCiXkKmV1V9bd2vrkT-hv7C8xycystUihfZuBM5ec5JzzJTn5DsBSllpNqKGxshTHpEmdSSlWxEzkuWBEUBy4Ozd6eWePfDygBzPwvj4LU_JDTBfcvGUEf-0N_ETb34zcOPfQcN4Vk1swR3I3vfKQaPuKPIqlJbM38wdQXBysyEl9Hs_Vs9fC0ZzX7PebsOZ16BpiT_sufKn_ukw56TcmY9lQ538QOv5vs-7BnQqUopVyFN2HGTN4APMb1bb7AhxvOsdy7CUqChM0tKhr7BithKofaCdUmkDyB_L17PtHBrkYqPwqPGq5L6mQ9FpyYy-jrV8XP8_EN4N8RsjkFG3X97ujr4eHZvQQ9tqt3dVOXNVpiBVNMIkVMQYLkolMECM8p5m2spBO_yw1JMGFaiqbJNJIbYkVnj9GSwcttS5ERiTDj2B2MByYJ4BkgrVWhTUOCZHCiiK3qmkxy1SmZS5ZBG_r7uKqIjH3LTzi9WTG648H_UXweip7UlJ33Cj1JvT6VESM-j7ZjVG-31vnne4-y3Zwj3-O4FU9LLgzQb-vIgZmODnlaV40E39AN43gcTlepm_LKM79YecI3oVe_8uf8NZqZzNcPf0X4UWY31pr8-6H3qdncNvhOVrmJz6H2fFoYl44zDSWL4NpXAJpERKI
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimal+Analysis+of+Left+Atrial+Strain+by+Speckle+Tracking+Echocardiography%3A+P-wave+versus+R-wave+Trigger&rft.jtitle=Echocardiography+%28Mount+Kisco%2C+N.Y.%29&rft.au=Hayashi%2C+Shuji&rft.au=Yamada%2C+Hirotsugu&rft.au=Bando%2C+Mika&rft.au=Saijo%2C+Yoshihito&rft.date=2015-08-01&rft.eissn=1540-8175&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1241&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fecho.12834&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F25363348&rft.externalDocID=25363348
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0742-2822&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0742-2822&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0742-2822&client=summon