Adolescent non-adherence: Prevalence and consequences in liver transplant recipients
: Few studies have examined the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse consequences associated with non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in the adolescent liver transplant population. Our hypothesis is that a significant proportion of adolescent liver transplant recipients exhibit non‐a...
Saved in:
Published in | Pediatric transplantation Vol. 10; no. 3; pp. 304 - 310 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Malden, USA
Blackwell Publishing Inc
01.05.2006
Blackwell |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1397-3142 1399-3046 |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00451.x |
Cover
Abstract | : Few studies have examined the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse consequences associated with non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in the adolescent liver transplant population. Our hypothesis is that a significant proportion of adolescent liver transplant recipients exhibit non‐adherence to medical regimens and that certain demographic and medical condition‐related characteristics can be identified as potential predictors of non‐adherent behavior. Furthermore, non‐adherence leads to a greater incidence of morbidity and mortality in this population as compared with the adherent subset of adolescent patients. We reviewed the charts of 97 patients from 1987 to 2002 who by December of 2002 had survived at least 1 yr post‐transplant and were followed by the Pediatric Liver Transplant Service at any point during their adolescent period (ages of 12–21). Non‐adherence was defined as documentation of a report of non‐adherence by a patient, parent or healthcare provider that was recorded in the patient's legal medical record. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse outcomes associated with non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi‐square test or the Fisher exact probability test. The unpaired Student's t‐test was used to analyze the continuous variable of age at transplant. Using the inclusion criteria, a total of 97 patients represented the study sample of whom 37 subjects (38.1%) were defined as non‐adherent and 60 (61.8%) were adherent. Non‐adherent subjects were more likely to be female, older (>18 yr) and from a single‐parent household. There was no significant difference in immunosuppressive regimen between non‐adherent and adherent patients. Non‐adherence was significantly (p<0.025) associated with lower socioeconomic status (SES), older age at transplant (p<0.005, 95% CI: −5.5 to −.99, Student's t‐test) and episodes of late acute rejection (p<.001). Non‐adherence was also significantly associated with re‐transplantation and death secondary to chronic rejection by the Fisher exact test (p<0.006 and p<0.05, respectively). Non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy is a prevalent problem that is correlated with certain demographic and medical condition‐related risk factors and more frequent adverse consequences in the adolescent liver transplant population. The greater incidence of late acute rejection, death and re‐transplantation owing to chronic rejection in non‐adherent patients suggests that non‐adherence is significantly associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Further investigation to identify patients at greatest risk for non‐adherence is necessary to design the most effective intervention to increase patient survival and well being. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Few studies have examined the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse consequences associated with non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in the adolescent liver transplant population. Our hypothesis is that a significant proportion of adolescent liver transplant recipients exhibit non-adherence to medical regimens and that certain demographic and medical condition-related characteristics can be identified as potential predictors of non-adherent behavior. Furthermore, non-adherence leads to a greater incidence of morbidity and mortality in this population as compared with the adherent subset of adolescent patients. We reviewed the charts of 97 patients from 1987 to 2002 who by December of 2002 had survived at least 1 yr post-transplant and were followed by the Pediatric Liver Transplant Service at any point during their adolescent period (ages of 12-21). Non-adherence was defined as documentation of a report of non-adherence by a patient, parent or healthcare provider that was recorded in the patient's legal medical record. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse outcomes associated with non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test or the Fisher exact probability test. The unpaired Student's t-test was used to analyze the continuous variable of age at transplant. Using the inclusion criteria, a total of 97 patients represented the study sample of whom 37 subjects (38.1%) were defined as non-adherent and 60 (61.8%) were adherent. Non-adherent subjects were more likely to be female, older (>18 yr) and from a single-parent household. There was no significant difference in immunosuppressive regimen between non-adherent and adherent patients. Non-adherence was significantly (p<0.025) associated with lower socioeconomic status (SES), older age at transplant (p<0.005, 95% CI: -5.5 to -.99, Student's t-test) and episodes of late acute rejection (p<.001). Non-adherence was also significantly associated with re-transplantation and death secondary to chronic rejection by the Fisher exact test (p<0.006 and p<0.05, respectively). Non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy is a prevalent problem that is correlated with certain demographic and medical condition-related risk factors and more frequent adverse consequences in the adolescent liver transplant population. The greater incidence of late acute rejection, death and re-transplantation owing to chronic rejection in non-adherent patients suggests that non-adherence is significantly associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Further investigation to identify patients at greatest risk for non-adherence is necessary to design the most effective intervention to increase patient survival and well being.Few studies have examined the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse consequences associated with non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in the adolescent liver transplant population. Our hypothesis is that a significant proportion of adolescent liver transplant recipients exhibit non-adherence to medical regimens and that certain demographic and medical condition-related characteristics can be identified as potential predictors of non-adherent behavior. Furthermore, non-adherence leads to a greater incidence of morbidity and mortality in this population as compared with the adherent subset of adolescent patients. We reviewed the charts of 97 patients from 1987 to 2002 who by December of 2002 had survived at least 1 yr post-transplant and were followed by the Pediatric Liver Transplant Service at any point during their adolescent period (ages of 12-21). Non-adherence was defined as documentation of a report of non-adherence by a patient, parent or healthcare provider that was recorded in the patient's legal medical record. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse outcomes associated with non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test or the Fisher exact probability test. The unpaired Student's t-test was used to analyze the continuous variable of age at transplant. Using the inclusion criteria, a total of 97 patients represented the study sample of whom 37 subjects (38.1%) were defined as non-adherent and 60 (61.8%) were adherent. Non-adherent subjects were more likely to be female, older (>18 yr) and from a single-parent household. There was no significant difference in immunosuppressive regimen between non-adherent and adherent patients. Non-adherence was significantly (p<0.025) associated with lower socioeconomic status (SES), older age at transplant (p<0.005, 95% CI: -5.5 to -.99, Student's t-test) and episodes of late acute rejection (p<.001). Non-adherence was also significantly associated with re-transplantation and death secondary to chronic rejection by the Fisher exact test (p<0.006 and p<0.05, respectively). Non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy is a prevalent problem that is correlated with certain demographic and medical condition-related risk factors and more frequent adverse consequences in the adolescent liver transplant population. The greater incidence of late acute rejection, death and re-transplantation owing to chronic rejection in non-adherent patients suggests that non-adherence is significantly associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Further investigation to identify patients at greatest risk for non-adherence is necessary to design the most effective intervention to increase patient survival and well being. Few studies have examined the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse consequences associated with non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in the adolescent liver transplant population. Our hypothesis is that a significant proportion of adolescent liver transplant recipients exhibit non‐adherence to medical regimens and that certain demographic and medical condition‐related characteristics can be identified as potential predictors of non‐adherent behavior. Furthermore, non‐adherence leads to a greater incidence of morbidity and mortality in this population as compared with the adherent subset of adolescent patients. We reviewed the charts of 97 patients from 1987 to 2002 who by December of 2002 had survived at least 1 yr post‐transplant and were followed by the Pediatric Liver Transplant Service at any point during their adolescent period (ages of 12–21). Non‐adherence was defined as documentation of a report of non‐adherence by a patient, parent or healthcare provider that was recorded in the patient's legal medical record. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse outcomes associated with non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi‐square test or the Fisher exact probability test. The unpaired Student's t‐test was used to analyze the continuous variable of age at transplant. Using the inclusion criteria, a total of 97 patients represented the study sample of whom 37 subjects (38.1%) were defined as non‐adherent and 60 (61.8%) were adherent. Non‐adherent subjects were more likely to be female, older (>18 yr) and from a single‐parent household. There was no significant difference in immunosuppressive regimen between non‐adherent and adherent patients. Non‐adherence was significantly (p<0.025) associated with lower socioeconomic status (SES), older age at transplant (p<0.005, 95% CI: −5.5 to −.99, Student's t‐test) and episodes of late acute rejection (p<.001). Non‐adherence was also significantly associated with re‐transplantation and death secondary to chronic rejection by the Fisher exact test (p<0.006 and p<0.05, respectively). Non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy is a prevalent problem that is correlated with certain demographic and medical condition‐related risk factors and more frequent adverse consequences in the adolescent liver transplant population. The greater incidence of late acute rejection, death and re‐transplantation owing to chronic rejection in non‐adherent patients suggests that non‐adherence is significantly associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Further investigation to identify patients at greatest risk for non‐adherence is necessary to design the most effective intervention to increase patient survival and well being. : Few studies have examined the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse consequences associated with non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in the adolescent liver transplant population. Our hypothesis is that a significant proportion of adolescent liver transplant recipients exhibit non‐adherence to medical regimens and that certain demographic and medical condition‐related characteristics can be identified as potential predictors of non‐adherent behavior. Furthermore, non‐adherence leads to a greater incidence of morbidity and mortality in this population as compared with the adherent subset of adolescent patients. We reviewed the charts of 97 patients from 1987 to 2002 who by December of 2002 had survived at least 1 yr post‐transplant and were followed by the Pediatric Liver Transplant Service at any point during their adolescent period (ages of 12–21). Non‐adherence was defined as documentation of a report of non‐adherence by a patient, parent or healthcare provider that was recorded in the patient's legal medical record. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse outcomes associated with non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi‐square test or the Fisher exact probability test. The unpaired Student's t‐test was used to analyze the continuous variable of age at transplant. Using the inclusion criteria, a total of 97 patients represented the study sample of whom 37 subjects (38.1%) were defined as non‐adherent and 60 (61.8%) were adherent. Non‐adherent subjects were more likely to be female, older (>18 yr) and from a single‐parent household. There was no significant difference in immunosuppressive regimen between non‐adherent and adherent patients. Non‐adherence was significantly (p<0.025) associated with lower socioeconomic status (SES), older age at transplant (p<0.005, 95% CI: −5.5 to −.99, Student's t‐test) and episodes of late acute rejection (p<.001). Non‐adherence was also significantly associated with re‐transplantation and death secondary to chronic rejection by the Fisher exact test (p<0.006 and p<0.05, respectively). Non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy is a prevalent problem that is correlated with certain demographic and medical condition‐related risk factors and more frequent adverse consequences in the adolescent liver transplant population. The greater incidence of late acute rejection, death and re‐transplantation owing to chronic rejection in non‐adherent patients suggests that non‐adherence is significantly associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Further investigation to identify patients at greatest risk for non‐adherence is necessary to design the most effective intervention to increase patient survival and well being. Few studies have examined the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse consequences associated with non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in the adolescent liver transplant population. Our hypothesis is that a significant proportion of adolescent liver transplant recipients exhibit non-adherence to medical regimens and that certain demographic and medical condition-related characteristics can be identified as potential predictors of non-adherent behavior. Furthermore, non-adherence leads to a greater incidence of morbidity and mortality in this population as compared with the adherent subset of adolescent patients. We reviewed the charts of 97 patients from 1987 to 2002 who by December of 2002 had survived at least 1 yr post-transplant and were followed by the Pediatric Liver Transplant Service at any point during their adolescent period (ages of 12-21). Non-adherence was defined as documentation of a report of non-adherence by a patient, parent or healthcare provider that was recorded in the patient's legal medical record. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse outcomes associated with non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test or the Fisher exact probability test. The unpaired Student's t-test was used to analyze the continuous variable of age at transplant. Using the inclusion criteria, a total of 97 patients represented the study sample of whom 37 subjects (38.1%) were defined as non-adherent and 60 (61.8%) were adherent. Non-adherent subjects were more likely to be female, older (>18 yr) and from a single-parent household. There was no significant difference in immunosuppressive regimen between non-adherent and adherent patients. Non-adherence was significantly (p<0.025) associated with lower socioeconomic status (SES), older age at transplant (p<0.005, 95% CI: -5.5 to -.99, Student's t-test) and episodes of late acute rejection (p<.001). Non-adherence was also significantly associated with re-transplantation and death secondary to chronic rejection by the Fisher exact test (p<0.006 and p<0.05, respectively). Non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy is a prevalent problem that is correlated with certain demographic and medical condition-related risk factors and more frequent adverse consequences in the adolescent liver transplant population. The greater incidence of late acute rejection, death and re-transplantation owing to chronic rejection in non-adherent patients suggests that non-adherence is significantly associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Further investigation to identify patients at greatest risk for non-adherence is necessary to design the most effective intervention to increase patient survival and well being. |
Author | Berquist, R. K. Cox, K. L. Berquist, W. E. Wayman, K. I. Litt, I. F. Esquivel, C. O. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: R. K. surname: Berquist fullname: Berquist, R. K. organization: Departments Pediatrics and Multi-Organ Transplantation – sequence: 2 givenname: W. E. surname: Berquist fullname: Berquist, W. E. organization: Departments Pediatrics and Multi-Organ Transplantation – sequence: 3 givenname: C. O. surname: Esquivel fullname: Esquivel, C. O. organization: Departments Pediatrics and Multi-Organ Transplantation – sequence: 4 givenname: K. L. surname: Cox fullname: Cox, K. L. organization: Departments Pediatrics and Multi-Organ Transplantation – sequence: 5 givenname: K. I. surname: Wayman fullname: Wayman, K. I. organization: Departments Pediatrics and Multi-Organ Transplantation – sequence: 6 givenname: I. F. surname: Litt fullname: Litt, I. F. organization: Division of Adolescent Medicine, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA, USA |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17733542$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16677353$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkV1v0zAUhi00xD7gL6DcwF2CnTh2jATSNI0VaYNpKnBpuc6xcHGdYqej-_ecrGWTuJpvfCw_7_l6j8lBHCIQUjBaMTzvlhVrlCobykVVU9pWlPKWVdtn5Ojh4-A-lmXDeH1IjnNeUsoE7_gLcsiEkLJpmyMyP-2HANlCHAssUpr-JySIFt4X1wluTZjiwsS-sEPM8HszvXPhYxH8LaRiTCbmdTAoT2D92mOi_JI8dyZkeLW_T8i3T-fzs1l5-fXi89npZWlbylipuFBSObHoLSgmOe861xllXCtELayDnsu-xsE6x5Sh1hq3UMJKtlCWAbZ_Qt7u8q7TgJ3lUa88jhKwHRg2WQupeC1lh-DrPbhZrKDX6-RXJt3pf3tA4M0eMNma4HAq6_Mjh1TT8hq5bsfZNOScwD0iVE_W6KWeHNCTA3qyRt9bo7co_fif1PrRjH6IuEMfnpLgwy7BHx_g7smF9fX5_AYj1Jc7vc8jbB_0Jv3CRTWy1T--XOjvV_OrZiZv9Kz5C5CUtzE |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1093_jamiaopen_ooab008 crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v23_i13_2365 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1399_0012_2011_01489_x crossref_primary_10_12968_gasn_2007_5_2_23095 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinre_2020_08_013 crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_12671 crossref_primary_10_2196_45352 crossref_primary_10_1067_j_cpsurg_2008_05_002 crossref_primary_10_1097_MPG_0000000000003549 crossref_primary_10_1002_lt_21582 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arcped_2007_10_016 crossref_primary_10_1038_ncpgasthep0529 crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_13523 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2010_04_013 crossref_primary_10_1097_TP_0000000000001009 crossref_primary_10_5694_mja2_50833 crossref_primary_10_1111_jjns_12078 crossref_primary_10_1002_lt_23769 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1399_3046_2010_01428_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_transproceed_2010_09_087 crossref_primary_10_1093_jpepsy_jsq015 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pedn_2011_06_006 crossref_primary_10_7586_jkbns_2016_18_1_17 crossref_primary_10_1097_MOT_0b013e32834a945d crossref_primary_10_1097_TP_0b013e318166163e crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2021_11_027 crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_13530 crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_13058 crossref_primary_10_1002_hep_21830 crossref_primary_10_1097_TP_0b013e3181ca87b0 crossref_primary_10_2215_CJN_07241009 crossref_primary_10_1542_peds_2009_0415 crossref_primary_10_1097_TP_0b013e31824b822d crossref_primary_10_1111_ajt_13386 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinre_2018_08_017 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soard_2007_08_002 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1399_3046_2007_00809_x crossref_primary_10_1177_1526924818781567 crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_13188 crossref_primary_10_1177_1526924817699958 crossref_primary_10_1200_JCO_2007_14_0699 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11894_020_00802_1 crossref_primary_10_1111_ctr_13880 crossref_primary_10_1002_lt_23740 crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_12899 crossref_primary_10_1111_ajt_13184 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10880_023_09970_4 crossref_primary_10_1097_TP_0000000000004557 crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_14361 crossref_primary_10_1097_TP_0000000000004556 crossref_primary_10_1002_lt_22294 crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_14446 crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_13555 crossref_primary_10_5223_pghn_2013_16_4_207 crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_14288 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cct_2015_05_013 crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_12064 crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_14362 crossref_primary_10_1097_MOT_0b013e3282f94aab crossref_primary_10_1177_1941406411402326 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12593_014_0168_9 crossref_primary_10_1002_lt_23376 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yebeh_2015_06_040 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pedn_2020_09_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sempedsurg_2021_151104 crossref_primary_10_4155_cli_14_11 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2017_04_004 |
Cites_doi | 10.1097/00007890-199301000-00010 10.1046/j.1397-3142.2003.00117.x 10.1097/00007890-199502270-00003 10.1097/00007890-199511000-00006 10.1097/01.TP.0000110410.11524.7B 10.1542/peds.105.2.e29 10.1046/j.1600-6135.2003.00226.x 10.1093/ajhp/60.3.266 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00356.x 10.1007/s004670050335 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2004.00136.x 10.1097/00007890-199002000-00029 10.1016/S0031-3955(16)33815-9 10.1016/0197-0070(87)90246-4 10.1034/j.1399-3046.2000.00110.x 10.1097/00007890-199502000-00006 10.1542/peds.113.4.825 10.1016/S0163-8343(00)00098-0 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00285.x 10.1097/00007890-200009150-00001 10.2337/diacare.24.2.234 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00358.x 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00352.x |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2006 INIST-CNRS |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2006 INIST-CNRS |
DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00451.x |
DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic CrossRef MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1399-3046 |
EndPage | 310 |
ExternalDocumentID | 16677353 17733542 10_1111_j_1399_3046_2005_00451_x PETR451 ark_67375_WNG_VMTM3H7R_H |
Genre | article Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 123 1OC 29O 31~ 33P 36B 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52R 52S 52T 52U 52V 52W 52X 53G 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A01 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHQN AAIPD AAKAS AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABDBF ABEML ABJNI ABPVW ABQWH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBWZ ACCZN ACGFS ACGOF ACMXC ACPOU ACPRK ACRPL ACSCC ACUHS ACXBN ACXQS ACYXJ ADBBV ADBTR ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADNMO ADOZA ADXAS ADZCM ADZMN AEFGJ AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEUYR AEYWJ AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFWVQ AFZJQ AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AIACR AIDQK AIDYY AITYG AIURR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ATUGU AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BHBCM BMXJE BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 C45 CAG COF CS3 D-6 D-7 D-E D-F DCZOG DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EAD EAP EBC EBD EBS EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ESX EX3 F00 F01 F04 F5P FEDTE FUBAC G-S G.N GODZA H.X HF~ HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K48 KBYEO LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRMAN MRSTM MSFUL MSMAN MSSTM MXFUL MXMAN MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OVD P2P P2W P2X P2Z P4B P4D Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K ROL RX1 SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TUS UB1 W8V W99 WBKPD WHWMO WIH WIJ WIK WOHZO WOW WQJ WVDHM WXI WXSBR XG1 YFH ZZTAW ~IA ~WT AAHHS ACCFJ AEEZP AEQDE AEUQT AFPWT AIWBW AJBDE WRC AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c5011-946979f6bdce9174488f8a9af56626cfed47d24518f19a0ccafb96c71b9c1e353 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 1397-3142 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 02:08:08 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:54:05 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:11:50 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:54:01 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:12:12 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:54:31 EST 2025 Sun Sep 21 06:17:59 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Keywords | Human Pediatrics non-adherence Prevalence Digestive system Liver Transplantation Homotransplantation Adhesion Epidemiology Treatment transplant immunosuppression Surgery Adolescent Graft Child liver transplant |
Language | English |
License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5011-946979f6bdce9174488f8a9af56626cfed47d24518f19a0ccafb96c71b9c1e353 |
Notes | ark:/67375/WNG-VMTM3H7R-H istex:C1DD32AF855EBC01AA44544ED89029BDD46FD7DF ArticleID:PETR451 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 16677353 |
PQID | 67942778 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_67942778 pubmed_primary_16677353 pascalfrancis_primary_17733542 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1399_3046_2005_00451_x crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1399_3046_2005_00451_x wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1399_3046_2005_00451_x_PETR451 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_VMTM3H7R_H |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | May 2006 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2006-05-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2006 text: May 2006 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Malden, USA |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Malden, USA – name: Oxford – name: Denmark |
PublicationTitle | Pediatric transplantation |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Pediatr Transplant |
PublicationYear | 2006 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Inc Blackwell |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Inc – name: Blackwell |
References | Dobbels F, Van Damme-Lombaert R, Vanhaecke J, De Geest S. Growing pains: Non-adherence with the immunosuppressive regimen in adolescent transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant 2005: 9: 381-390. Bunzel B, Laederach-Hofmann K. Solid organ transplantation: Are there predictors for post transplant noncompliance? A literature overview. Transplantation 2000: 70: 711-716. Schweizer RT, Rovelli M, Palmeri D, Vossler E, Hull D, Bartus S. Noncompliance in organ transplant recipients. Transplantation 1990: 49: 374-377. Rianthavon P, Ettenger RB. Medication non-adherence in the adolescent renal transplant recipient: A clinician's viewpoint. Pediatr Transplant 2005: 9: 398-407. Shemesh E, Lurie S, Stuber M, et al. A pilot study of posttraumatic stress and non-adherence in pediatric liver transplant recipients. Pediatrics 2000: 105: 1-7. Frazier PA, Davis ASH, Dahl KE. Correlates of non-compliance among renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 1994: 8: 550-557. Hilbrands LB, Hoitsma J, Koene RA. Medication compliance after renal transplantation. Transplantation 1995: 60: 914-920. Thompson SJ, Auslander WF, White NH. Comparison of single-mother and two-parent families on metabolic control of children with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2001: 24: 234-238. Hsu DT. Biological and psychological differences in the child and adolescent transplant recipient. Pediatr Transplant 2005: 9: 416-421. Vasquez EM, Tanzi M, Benedetti E, Pollak R. Medication noncompliance after kidney transplantation. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2003: 60: 266-269. Friedman IM, Litt IF. Adolescents' compliance with therapeutic regimens: Psychological and social aspects and interventions. J Adolesc Health Care 1987: 8: 52-67. Shaw RJ, Palmer L, Blasey C, Sarwal M. A typology of non-adherence in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant 2003: 7: 489-493. Kiley DJ, Lam CS, Pollak R. A study of treatment compliance following kidney transplantation. Transplantation 1993: 55: 51. Falkenstein K, Flynn L, Kirkpatrick B, Casa-Melley A, Dunn S. Non-compliance in children post-liver transplant. Who are the culprits? Pediatr Transplant 2004: 8: 233-236. Conley SB, Salvatierra O. Noncompliance among adolescents: Does it impact the success of transplantation? Nephrol News Issues 1996: 8: 18-19. Rianthavon P, Ettenger RB, Malekzadeh M, Marik JL, Struber M. Noncompliance with immunosuppressive medications in pediatric and adolescent patients receiving solid-organ transplants. Transplantation 2004: 77: 778-782. Litt IF, Cuskey WR. Compliance with medical regimens during adolescence. Pediatr Clin North Am 1980: 27: 3-15. De Geest S, Borgermans L, Gemoets H, et al. Incidence, determinants, and consequences of subclinical noncompliance with immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation 1995: 59: 340-347. Lurie S, Shemesh E, Sheiner PA, et al. Non-adherence in pediatric liver transplant recipients-an assessment of risk factors and natural history. Pediatr Transplant 2000: 4: 200-206. Shemesh E, Shneider BL, Savitzky JK, et al. Medication adherence in pediatric and adolescent liver transplant recipients. Pediatrics 2004: 113: 825-832. Rodriguez A, Diaz M, Colon A, Santiago DEA. Psychosocial profile of noncompliant transplant patients. Transplant Proc 1991: 23: 1807-1809. Laederach-Hoffman K, Bunzel B. Noncompliance in organ transplant recipients: A Literature Review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2000: 22: 412-424. Dhanireddy KK, Maniscalco J, Kirk AD. Is tolerance induction the answer to adolescent non-adherence? Pediatr Transplant 2005: 9: 357-363. De Geest S, Abraham I, Moons P, et al. Late acute rejection and subclinical noncompliance with cyclosporine therapy in heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 1998: 17: 854-863. Troppmann WC, Benedetti E, Gruessner R, et al. Retransplantation after renal allograft loss due to noncompliance. Transplantation 1995: 59: 467-471. Blowey DL, Hebert D, Arbus GS, Pool R, Korus M, Koren G. Compliance with cyclosporine in adolescent renal transplant recipients. Pediatr Nephrol 1997: 11: 547-551. Penkower L, Dew MA, Ellis D, Sereika SM, Kitutu JM, Shapiro R. Psychological Distress and adherence to the medical regimen among adolescent renal transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2003: 3: 1418-1425. 1980; 27 1994; 8 2004; 77 1998; 17 1995; 60 2004; 113 1997; 11 1987; 8 1991; 23 1990; 49 2000; 4 1995; 59 2000; 105 1993; 55 2005; 9 2004; 8 2000; 22 2003; 7 2003; 3 2000; 70 2003; 60 2001; 24 1996; 8 De Geest S (e_1_2_6_24_2) 1998; 17 Rianthavon P (e_1_2_6_19_2) 2005; 9 De Geest S (e_1_2_6_17_2) 1995; 59 e_1_2_6_12_2 e_1_2_6_13_2 e_1_2_6_10_2 Rodriguez A (e_1_2_6_25_2) 1991; 23 e_1_2_6_11_2 e_1_2_6_16_2 e_1_2_6_14_2 e_1_2_6_15_2 Rianthavon P (e_1_2_6_28_2) 2004; 77 e_1_2_6_20_2 e_1_2_6_8_2 e_1_2_6_7_2 e_1_2_6_9_2 e_1_2_6_4_2 e_1_2_6_3_2 e_1_2_6_6_2 e_1_2_6_5_2 Conley SB (e_1_2_6_18_2) 1996; 8 e_1_2_6_23_2 e_1_2_6_2_2 e_1_2_6_22_2 e_1_2_6_21_2 e_1_2_6_27_2 e_1_2_6_26_2 |
References_xml | – reference: Shaw RJ, Palmer L, Blasey C, Sarwal M. A typology of non-adherence in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant 2003: 7: 489-493. – reference: Shemesh E, Shneider BL, Savitzky JK, et al. Medication adherence in pediatric and adolescent liver transplant recipients. Pediatrics 2004: 113: 825-832. – reference: Hilbrands LB, Hoitsma J, Koene RA. Medication compliance after renal transplantation. Transplantation 1995: 60: 914-920. – reference: Rianthavon P, Ettenger RB, Malekzadeh M, Marik JL, Struber M. Noncompliance with immunosuppressive medications in pediatric and adolescent patients receiving solid-organ transplants. Transplantation 2004: 77: 778-782. – reference: Blowey DL, Hebert D, Arbus GS, Pool R, Korus M, Koren G. Compliance with cyclosporine in adolescent renal transplant recipients. Pediatr Nephrol 1997: 11: 547-551. – reference: Schweizer RT, Rovelli M, Palmeri D, Vossler E, Hull D, Bartus S. Noncompliance in organ transplant recipients. Transplantation 1990: 49: 374-377. – reference: Rodriguez A, Diaz M, Colon A, Santiago DEA. Psychosocial profile of noncompliant transplant patients. Transplant Proc 1991: 23: 1807-1809. – reference: Conley SB, Salvatierra O. Noncompliance among adolescents: Does it impact the success of transplantation? Nephrol News Issues 1996: 8: 18-19. – reference: Kiley DJ, Lam CS, Pollak R. A study of treatment compliance following kidney transplantation. Transplantation 1993: 55: 51. – reference: Rianthavon P, Ettenger RB. Medication non-adherence in the adolescent renal transplant recipient: A clinician's viewpoint. Pediatr Transplant 2005: 9: 398-407. – reference: Litt IF, Cuskey WR. Compliance with medical regimens during adolescence. Pediatr Clin North Am 1980: 27: 3-15. – reference: De Geest S, Abraham I, Moons P, et al. Late acute rejection and subclinical noncompliance with cyclosporine therapy in heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 1998: 17: 854-863. – reference: Falkenstein K, Flynn L, Kirkpatrick B, Casa-Melley A, Dunn S. Non-compliance in children post-liver transplant. Who are the culprits? Pediatr Transplant 2004: 8: 233-236. – reference: Shemesh E, Lurie S, Stuber M, et al. A pilot study of posttraumatic stress and non-adherence in pediatric liver transplant recipients. Pediatrics 2000: 105: 1-7. – reference: De Geest S, Borgermans L, Gemoets H, et al. Incidence, determinants, and consequences of subclinical noncompliance with immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation 1995: 59: 340-347. – reference: Vasquez EM, Tanzi M, Benedetti E, Pollak R. Medication noncompliance after kidney transplantation. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2003: 60: 266-269. – reference: Bunzel B, Laederach-Hofmann K. Solid organ transplantation: Are there predictors for post transplant noncompliance? A literature overview. Transplantation 2000: 70: 711-716. – reference: Lurie S, Shemesh E, Sheiner PA, et al. Non-adherence in pediatric liver transplant recipients-an assessment of risk factors and natural history. Pediatr Transplant 2000: 4: 200-206. – reference: Troppmann WC, Benedetti E, Gruessner R, et al. Retransplantation after renal allograft loss due to noncompliance. Transplantation 1995: 59: 467-471. – reference: Dobbels F, Van Damme-Lombaert R, Vanhaecke J, De Geest S. Growing pains: Non-adherence with the immunosuppressive regimen in adolescent transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant 2005: 9: 381-390. – reference: Dhanireddy KK, Maniscalco J, Kirk AD. Is tolerance induction the answer to adolescent non-adherence? Pediatr Transplant 2005: 9: 357-363. – reference: Frazier PA, Davis ASH, Dahl KE. Correlates of non-compliance among renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 1994: 8: 550-557. – reference: Penkower L, Dew MA, Ellis D, Sereika SM, Kitutu JM, Shapiro R. Psychological Distress and adherence to the medical regimen among adolescent renal transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2003: 3: 1418-1425. – reference: Hsu DT. Biological and psychological differences in the child and adolescent transplant recipient. Pediatr Transplant 2005: 9: 416-421. – reference: Laederach-Hoffman K, Bunzel B. Noncompliance in organ transplant recipients: A Literature Review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2000: 22: 412-424. – reference: Friedman IM, Litt IF. Adolescents' compliance with therapeutic regimens: Psychological and social aspects and interventions. J Adolesc Health Care 1987: 8: 52-67. – reference: Thompson SJ, Auslander WF, White NH. Comparison of single-mother and two-parent families on metabolic control of children with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2001: 24: 234-238. – volume: 24 start-page: 234 year: 2001 end-page: 238 article-title: Comparison of single‐mother and two‐parent families on metabolic control of children with diabetes publication-title: Diabetes Care – volume: 49 start-page: 374 year: 1990 end-page: 377 article-title: Noncompliance in organ transplant recipients publication-title: Transplantation – volume: 55 start-page: 51 year: 1993 article-title: A study of treatment compliance following kidney transplantation publication-title: Transplantation – volume: 8 start-page: 233 year: 2004 end-page: 236 article-title: Non‐compliance in children post‐liver transplant. Who are the culprits publication-title: Pediatr Transplant – volume: 59 start-page: 467 year: 1995 end-page: 471 article-title: Retransplantation after renal allograft loss due to noncompliance publication-title: Transplantation – volume: 8 start-page: 18 year: 1996 end-page: 19 article-title: Noncompliance among adolescents: Does it impact the success of transplantation publication-title: Nephrol News Issues – volume: 9 start-page: 398 year: 2005 end-page: 407 article-title: Medication non‐adherence in the adolescent renal transplant recipient: A clinician's viewpoint publication-title: Pediatr Transplant – volume: 9 start-page: 381 year: 2005 end-page: 390 article-title: Growing pains: Non‐adherence with the immunosuppressive regimen in adolescent transplant recipients publication-title: Pediatr Transplant – volume: 60 start-page: 266 year: 2003 end-page: 269 article-title: Medication noncompliance after kidney transplantation publication-title: Am J Health Syst Pharm – volume: 9 start-page: 416 year: 2005 end-page: 421 article-title: Biological and psychological differences in the child and adolescent transplant recipient publication-title: Pediatr Transplant – volume: 9 start-page: 357 year: 2005 end-page: 363 article-title: Is tolerance induction the answer to adolescent non‐adherence publication-title: Pediatr Transplant – volume: 4 start-page: 200 year: 2000 end-page: 206 article-title: Non‐adherence in pediatric liver transplant recipients‐an assessment of risk factors and natural history publication-title: Pediatr Transplant – volume: 8 start-page: 52 year: 1987 end-page: 67 article-title: Adolescents' compliance with therapeutic regimens: Psychological and social aspects and interventions publication-title: J Adolesc Health Care – volume: 70 start-page: 711 year: 2000 end-page: 716 article-title: Solid organ transplantation: Are there predictors for post transplant noncompliance? A literature overview publication-title: Transplantation – volume: 105 start-page: 1 year: 2000 end-page: 7 article-title: A pilot study of posttraumatic stress and non‐adherence in pediatric liver transplant recipients publication-title: Pediatrics – volume: 3 start-page: 1418 year: 2003 end-page: 1425 article-title: Psychological Distress and adherence to the medical regimen among adolescent renal transplant recipients publication-title: Am J Transplant – volume: 17 start-page: 854 year: 1998 end-page: 863 article-title: Late acute rejection and subclinical noncompliance with cyclosporine therapy in heart transplant recipients publication-title: J Heart Lung Transplant – volume: 60 start-page: 914 year: 1995 end-page: 920 article-title: Medication compliance after renal transplantation publication-title: Transplantation – volume: 27 start-page: 3 year: 1980 end-page: 15 article-title: Compliance with medical regimens during adolescence publication-title: Pediatr Clin North Am – volume: 113 start-page: 825 year: 2004 end-page: 832 article-title: Medication adherence in pediatric and adolescent liver transplant recipients publication-title: Pediatrics – volume: 77 start-page: 778 year: 2004 end-page: 782 article-title: Noncompliance with immunosuppressive medications in pediatric and adolescent patients receiving solid‐organ transplants publication-title: Transplantation – volume: 22 start-page: 412 year: 2000 end-page: 424 article-title: Noncompliance in organ transplant recipients: A Literature Review publication-title: Gen Hosp Psychiatry – volume: 23 start-page: 1807 year: 1991 end-page: 1809 article-title: Psychosocial profile of noncompliant transplant patients publication-title: Transplant Proc – volume: 7 start-page: 489 year: 2003 end-page: 493 article-title: A typology of non‐adherence in pediatric renal transplant recipients publication-title: Pediatr Transplant – volume: 59 start-page: 340 year: 1995 end-page: 347 article-title: Incidence, determinants, and consequences of subclinical noncompliance with immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplant recipients publication-title: Transplantation – volume: 8 start-page: 550 year: 1994 end-page: 557 article-title: Correlates of non‐compliance among renal transplant recipients publication-title: Clin Transplant – volume: 11 start-page: 547 year: 1997 end-page: 551 article-title: Compliance with cyclosporine in adolescent renal transplant recipients publication-title: Pediatr Nephrol – ident: e_1_2_6_3_2 doi: 10.1097/00007890-199301000-00010 – volume: 17 start-page: 854 year: 1998 ident: e_1_2_6_24_2 article-title: Late acute rejection and subclinical noncompliance with cyclosporine therapy in heart transplant recipients publication-title: J Heart Lung Transplant – ident: e_1_2_6_8_2 doi: 10.1046/j.1397-3142.2003.00117.x – ident: e_1_2_6_26_2 doi: 10.1097/00007890-199502270-00003 – ident: e_1_2_6_13_2 doi: 10.1097/00007890-199511000-00006 – volume: 77 start-page: 778 year: 2004 ident: e_1_2_6_28_2 article-title: Noncompliance with immunosuppressive medications in pediatric and adolescent patients receiving solid‐organ transplants publication-title: Transplantation doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000110410.11524.7B – ident: e_1_2_6_10_2 doi: 10.1542/peds.105.2.e29 – volume: 23 start-page: 1807 year: 1991 ident: e_1_2_6_25_2 article-title: Psychosocial profile of noncompliant transplant patients publication-title: Transplant Proc – ident: e_1_2_6_20_2 doi: 10.1097/00007890-199301000-00010 – ident: e_1_2_6_9_2 doi: 10.1046/j.1600-6135.2003.00226.x – ident: e_1_2_6_22_2 doi: 10.1093/ajhp/60.3.266 – ident: e_1_2_6_6_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00356.x – ident: e_1_2_6_4_2 doi: 10.1007/s004670050335 – ident: e_1_2_6_14_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2004.00136.x – ident: e_1_2_6_23_2 doi: 10.1097/00007890-199002000-00029 – ident: e_1_2_6_5_2 doi: 10.1016/S0031-3955(16)33815-9 – ident: e_1_2_6_7_2 doi: 10.1016/0197-0070(87)90246-4 – ident: e_1_2_6_12_2 doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3046.2000.00110.x – volume: 8 start-page: 18 year: 1996 ident: e_1_2_6_18_2 article-title: Noncompliance among adolescents: Does it impact the success of transplantation publication-title: Nephrol News Issues – volume: 59 start-page: 340 year: 1995 ident: e_1_2_6_17_2 article-title: Incidence, determinants, and consequences of subclinical noncompliance with immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplant recipients publication-title: Transplantation doi: 10.1097/00007890-199502000-00006 – ident: e_1_2_6_15_2 doi: 10.1542/peds.113.4.825 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_2 doi: 10.1016/S0163-8343(00)00098-0 – ident: e_1_2_6_16_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00285.x – ident: e_1_2_6_11_2 doi: 10.1097/00007890-200009150-00001 – ident: e_1_2_6_21_2 doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.2.234 – volume: 9 start-page: 398 year: 2005 ident: e_1_2_6_19_2 article-title: Medication non‐adherence in the adolescent renal transplant recipient: A clinician's viewpoint publication-title: Pediatr Transplant doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00358.x – ident: e_1_2_6_27_2 doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00352.x |
SSID | ssj0016484 |
Score | 2.0509722 |
Snippet | : Few studies have examined the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse consequences associated with non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in the... Few studies have examined the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse consequences associated with non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in the... Few studies have examined the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse consequences associated with non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in the... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref wiley istex |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 304 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Biological and medical sciences Female Humans Immunosuppressive Agents - administration & dosage Immunosuppressive Agents - pharmacology Liver Diseases - mortality Liver Diseases - therapy liver transplant Liver Transplantation - methods Medical sciences non-adherence Patient Compliance Retrospective Studies Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Time Factors transplant immunosuppression Treatment Outcome |
Title | Adolescent non-adherence: Prevalence and consequences in liver transplant recipients |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-VMTM3H7R-H/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1399-3046.2005.00451.x https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16677353 https://www.proquest.com/docview/67942778 |
Volume | 10 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9tAEF5KCqWXvh_qI91D6U3G0r6k3kKb1BQcinHS3JZ9kmKjhNiGkFN-Qn9jf0lnVrIShxxC6U2XkXZnZ7Qzs99-Q8hHZYMPwoZciiBzzoXLa-mLXDHmQuWtU-m4YLwvRwf8-5E46vBPeBem5YfoC27oGel_jQ5u7GLTyWFzzfFkb10a4aIYYDxZMIk0-l8nPZMUJAVV29-2xrIcvwHqufVFGzvVfVT6OSInzQKUF9uuF7eFpZtRbtqm9h6T2XqCLTplNlgt7cBd3OB-_D8aeEIeddEs3WnN7ym5F5pn5MG4O69_Tg53esIo2pw0fy5_G3_cXjD8TJE9yqQ7T9Q0nrpruG76q6FzRIzQZSJfn8P6U-ThOMXrm4sX5GBvd_pllHedHHInsAZbQxKu6iitdwHyQ0gJq1iZ2kQIJkvpYvBc-RIGX8WiNkOwqmhr6VRha1cEJthLsgWjDK8JtY5xE-SQsaB4DNE6gcieYWGFL21ZZkStV027juYcu23M9bV0B9SmUW3YhFPopDZ9npGilzxtqT7uIPMpGUYvYM5mCJVTQv_c_6YPx9MxG6mJHmVke8Nyrr6gwC1gChn5sDYlDR6OxzamCSerBbyu5qVSVUZetRZ2JSslSAuWEZns5M7D1j92pxN4evOvgm_Jw7YWhcjPd2RrebYK7yE6W9rt5Hd_AevPKxQ |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LT9wwEB5VILW9tPSdQsGHqresNg_bSW8IQdOWrKrVQrlZtuOIilVA7K6EeupP6G_sL-mMkw0s4oCq3nIZx57MxPP8BuC9NK5y3LhQcCfCNOU2zEUVhTJJrMsqY6VPF5QjURylX074STcOiHphWnyIPuBGmuH_16TgFJBe1XK8XUNK7S1jIymPBmhQrvt0HVlI4x5LCt2CrJ1wm1NgLr1V1nPnSit31Tqx_YpqJ_UM2Ve3cy_uMkxX7Vx_UR08henyiG19ytlgMTcD-_MW-uN_4sEGPOkMWrbbSuAzeOCa5_Cw7FL2L-B4t8eMYs158-fXb12dtj2GHxkBSGnf9sR0UzF7o7Sb_WjYlIpG2Nzjr09RBBhBcVxQB-fsJRwd7E_2irAb5hBaTmHYHP1wmdfCVNahi4heYVZnOtc12pOxsLWrUlnFuPmsjnI9RMGqTS6sjExuI5fw5BWs4S7dG2DGJql2YpgkTqa1q43lVNwzjAyvYhPHAcjlZ1O2QzqngRtTdcPjQbYpYhvN4eTKs01dBRD1lBct2sc9aD54yegJ9OUZVctJrr6PPqnjclImhRyrIoDtFdG5foNEzcAjBLCzlCWFSk6ZG92488UMl8vTWMosgNetiF3TCoHUPAlAeEG597bVt_3JGJ_e_ivhDjwqJuWhOvw8-roJj9vQFBWCbsHa_HLh3qGxNjfbXgn_AqNdLzI |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LT9tAEF5VIKFeSt91S2EPVW-OYnsfdm-oEELbRCgKlNtqnypKZCKSSKin_oT-xv6SztiOIYgDqnrzZda74xnvzOy33xDyQRrvPDc-FtyLmDFu40K4JJZZZn3ujJXVccFgKPqn7Ms5P2_wT3gXpuaHaAtu6BnV_xodfObCupPD5hrjyd6qNMJ40oF4cpMJ2DUxQBq1VFKQFeR1g9sC63LsDqrn3pHWtqpN1Po1Qif1HLQX6rYX98Wl62FutU_1tslktcIanjLpLBemY3_eIX_8Pyp4Sp404Szdr-3vGXnky-dka9Ac2L8gZ_stYxQtL8s_v35r96O-YfiJIn2Uri49UV06am8Bu-lFSacIGaGLin19CgZAkYhjhvc35y_Jae9w_LkfN60cYsuxCFtAFi6LIIyzHhJEyAnzkOtCB4gmU2GDd0y6FCafh6TQXTCrYAphZWIKm_iMZ6_IBszSvyHU2IxpL7pZ5iULPhjLEdrTTQx3qUnTiMjVV1O24TnHdhtTdSvfAbUpVBt24eSqUpu6jkjSSs5qro8HyHysDKMV0FcTxMpJrr4Pj9TZYDzI-nKk-hHZXbOcmzdI8AtYQkT2VqakwMXx3EaX_nI5h-EKlkqZR-R1bWE3skKANM8iIio7efC01cnheARPb_9VcI9snRz01Lfj4dd35HFdl0IU6A7ZWFwt_XuI1BZmt3LBv9_3LeE |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adolescent+non-adherence%3A+prevalence+and+consequences+in+liver+transplant+recipients&rft.jtitle=Pediatric+transplantation&rft.au=Berquist%2C+R+K&rft.au=Berquist%2C+W+E&rft.au=Esquivel%2C+C+O&rft.au=Cox%2C+K+L&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.issn=1397-3142&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=304&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1399-3046.2005.00451.x&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1397-3142&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1397-3142&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1397-3142&client=summon |