Adolescent non-adherence: Prevalence and consequences in liver transplant recipients

: Few studies have examined the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse consequences associated with non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in the adolescent liver transplant population. Our hypothesis is that a significant proportion of adolescent liver transplant recipients exhibit non‐a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPediatric transplantation Vol. 10; no. 3; pp. 304 - 310
Main Authors Berquist, R. K., Berquist, W. E., Esquivel, C. O., Cox, K. L., Wayman, K. I., Litt, I. F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Malden, USA Blackwell Publishing Inc 01.05.2006
Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1397-3142
1399-3046
DOI10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00451.x

Cover

Abstract : Few studies have examined the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse consequences associated with non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in the adolescent liver transplant population. Our hypothesis is that a significant proportion of adolescent liver transplant recipients exhibit non‐adherence to medical regimens and that certain demographic and medical condition‐related characteristics can be identified as potential predictors of non‐adherent behavior. Furthermore, non‐adherence leads to a greater incidence of morbidity and mortality in this population as compared with the adherent subset of adolescent patients. We reviewed the charts of 97 patients from 1987 to 2002 who by December of 2002 had survived at least 1 yr post‐transplant and were followed by the Pediatric Liver Transplant Service at any point during their adolescent period (ages of 12–21). Non‐adherence was defined as documentation of a report of non‐adherence by a patient, parent or healthcare provider that was recorded in the patient's legal medical record. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse outcomes associated with non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi‐square test or the Fisher exact probability test. The unpaired Student's t‐test was used to analyze the continuous variable of age at transplant. Using the inclusion criteria, a total of 97 patients represented the study sample of whom 37 subjects (38.1%) were defined as non‐adherent and 60 (61.8%) were adherent. Non‐adherent subjects were more likely to be female, older (>18 yr) and from a single‐parent household. There was no significant difference in immunosuppressive regimen between non‐adherent and adherent patients. Non‐adherence was significantly (p<0.025) associated with lower socioeconomic status (SES), older age at transplant (p<0.005, 95% CI: −5.5 to −.99, Student's t‐test) and episodes of late acute rejection (p<.001). Non‐adherence was also significantly associated with re‐transplantation and death secondary to chronic rejection by the Fisher exact test (p<0.006 and p<0.05, respectively). Non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy is a prevalent problem that is correlated with certain demographic and medical condition‐related risk factors and more frequent adverse consequences in the adolescent liver transplant population. The greater incidence of late acute rejection, death and re‐transplantation owing to chronic rejection in non‐adherent patients suggests that non‐adherence is significantly associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Further investigation to identify patients at greatest risk for non‐adherence is necessary to design the most effective intervention to increase patient survival and well being.
AbstractList Few studies have examined the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse consequences associated with non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in the adolescent liver transplant population. Our hypothesis is that a significant proportion of adolescent liver transplant recipients exhibit non-adherence to medical regimens and that certain demographic and medical condition-related characteristics can be identified as potential predictors of non-adherent behavior. Furthermore, non-adherence leads to a greater incidence of morbidity and mortality in this population as compared with the adherent subset of adolescent patients. We reviewed the charts of 97 patients from 1987 to 2002 who by December of 2002 had survived at least 1 yr post-transplant and were followed by the Pediatric Liver Transplant Service at any point during their adolescent period (ages of 12-21). Non-adherence was defined as documentation of a report of non-adherence by a patient, parent or healthcare provider that was recorded in the patient's legal medical record. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse outcomes associated with non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test or the Fisher exact probability test. The unpaired Student's t-test was used to analyze the continuous variable of age at transplant. Using the inclusion criteria, a total of 97 patients represented the study sample of whom 37 subjects (38.1%) were defined as non-adherent and 60 (61.8%) were adherent. Non-adherent subjects were more likely to be female, older (>18 yr) and from a single-parent household. There was no significant difference in immunosuppressive regimen between non-adherent and adherent patients. Non-adherence was significantly (p<0.025) associated with lower socioeconomic status (SES), older age at transplant (p<0.005, 95% CI: -5.5 to -.99, Student's t-test) and episodes of late acute rejection (p<.001). Non-adherence was also significantly associated with re-transplantation and death secondary to chronic rejection by the Fisher exact test (p<0.006 and p<0.05, respectively). Non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy is a prevalent problem that is correlated with certain demographic and medical condition-related risk factors and more frequent adverse consequences in the adolescent liver transplant population. The greater incidence of late acute rejection, death and re-transplantation owing to chronic rejection in non-adherent patients suggests that non-adherence is significantly associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Further investigation to identify patients at greatest risk for non-adherence is necessary to design the most effective intervention to increase patient survival and well being.Few studies have examined the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse consequences associated with non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in the adolescent liver transplant population. Our hypothesis is that a significant proportion of adolescent liver transplant recipients exhibit non-adherence to medical regimens and that certain demographic and medical condition-related characteristics can be identified as potential predictors of non-adherent behavior. Furthermore, non-adherence leads to a greater incidence of morbidity and mortality in this population as compared with the adherent subset of adolescent patients. We reviewed the charts of 97 patients from 1987 to 2002 who by December of 2002 had survived at least 1 yr post-transplant and were followed by the Pediatric Liver Transplant Service at any point during their adolescent period (ages of 12-21). Non-adherence was defined as documentation of a report of non-adherence by a patient, parent or healthcare provider that was recorded in the patient's legal medical record. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse outcomes associated with non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test or the Fisher exact probability test. The unpaired Student's t-test was used to analyze the continuous variable of age at transplant. Using the inclusion criteria, a total of 97 patients represented the study sample of whom 37 subjects (38.1%) were defined as non-adherent and 60 (61.8%) were adherent. Non-adherent subjects were more likely to be female, older (>18 yr) and from a single-parent household. There was no significant difference in immunosuppressive regimen between non-adherent and adherent patients. Non-adherence was significantly (p<0.025) associated with lower socioeconomic status (SES), older age at transplant (p<0.005, 95% CI: -5.5 to -.99, Student's t-test) and episodes of late acute rejection (p<.001). Non-adherence was also significantly associated with re-transplantation and death secondary to chronic rejection by the Fisher exact test (p<0.006 and p<0.05, respectively). Non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy is a prevalent problem that is correlated with certain demographic and medical condition-related risk factors and more frequent adverse consequences in the adolescent liver transplant population. The greater incidence of late acute rejection, death and re-transplantation owing to chronic rejection in non-adherent patients suggests that non-adherence is significantly associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Further investigation to identify patients at greatest risk for non-adherence is necessary to design the most effective intervention to increase patient survival and well being.
Few studies have examined the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse consequences associated with non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in the adolescent liver transplant population. Our hypothesis is that a significant proportion of adolescent liver transplant recipients exhibit non‐adherence to medical regimens and that certain demographic and medical condition‐related characteristics can be identified as potential predictors of non‐adherent behavior. Furthermore, non‐adherence leads to a greater incidence of morbidity and mortality in this population as compared with the adherent subset of adolescent patients. We reviewed the charts of 97 patients from 1987 to 2002 who by December of 2002 had survived at least 1 yr post‐transplant and were followed by the Pediatric Liver Transplant Service at any point during their adolescent period (ages of 12–21). Non‐adherence was defined as documentation of a report of non‐adherence by a patient, parent or healthcare provider that was recorded in the patient's legal medical record. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse outcomes associated with non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi‐square test or the Fisher exact probability test. The unpaired Student's t‐test was used to analyze the continuous variable of age at transplant. Using the inclusion criteria, a total of 97 patients represented the study sample of whom 37 subjects (38.1%) were defined as non‐adherent and 60 (61.8%) were adherent. Non‐adherent subjects were more likely to be female, older (>18 yr) and from a single‐parent household. There was no significant difference in immunosuppressive regimen between non‐adherent and adherent patients. Non‐adherence was significantly (p<0.025) associated with lower socioeconomic status (SES), older age at transplant (p<0.005, 95% CI: −5.5 to −.99, Student's t‐test) and episodes of late acute rejection (p<.001). Non‐adherence was also significantly associated with re‐transplantation and death secondary to chronic rejection by the Fisher exact test (p<0.006 and p<0.05, respectively). Non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy is a prevalent problem that is correlated with certain demographic and medical condition‐related risk factors and more frequent adverse consequences in the adolescent liver transplant population. The greater incidence of late acute rejection, death and re‐transplantation owing to chronic rejection in non‐adherent patients suggests that non‐adherence is significantly associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Further investigation to identify patients at greatest risk for non‐adherence is necessary to design the most effective intervention to increase patient survival and well being.
: Few studies have examined the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse consequences associated with non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in the adolescent liver transplant population. Our hypothesis is that a significant proportion of adolescent liver transplant recipients exhibit non‐adherence to medical regimens and that certain demographic and medical condition‐related characteristics can be identified as potential predictors of non‐adherent behavior. Furthermore, non‐adherence leads to a greater incidence of morbidity and mortality in this population as compared with the adherent subset of adolescent patients. We reviewed the charts of 97 patients from 1987 to 2002 who by December of 2002 had survived at least 1 yr post‐transplant and were followed by the Pediatric Liver Transplant Service at any point during their adolescent period (ages of 12–21). Non‐adherence was defined as documentation of a report of non‐adherence by a patient, parent or healthcare provider that was recorded in the patient's legal medical record. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse outcomes associated with non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi‐square test or the Fisher exact probability test. The unpaired Student's t‐test was used to analyze the continuous variable of age at transplant. Using the inclusion criteria, a total of 97 patients represented the study sample of whom 37 subjects (38.1%) were defined as non‐adherent and 60 (61.8%) were adherent. Non‐adherent subjects were more likely to be female, older (>18 yr) and from a single‐parent household. There was no significant difference in immunosuppressive regimen between non‐adherent and adherent patients. Non‐adherence was significantly (p<0.025) associated with lower socioeconomic status (SES), older age at transplant (p<0.005, 95% CI: −5.5 to −.99, Student's t‐test) and episodes of late acute rejection (p<.001). Non‐adherence was also significantly associated with re‐transplantation and death secondary to chronic rejection by the Fisher exact test (p<0.006 and p<0.05, respectively). Non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy is a prevalent problem that is correlated with certain demographic and medical condition‐related risk factors and more frequent adverse consequences in the adolescent liver transplant population. The greater incidence of late acute rejection, death and re‐transplantation owing to chronic rejection in non‐adherent patients suggests that non‐adherence is significantly associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Further investigation to identify patients at greatest risk for non‐adherence is necessary to design the most effective intervention to increase patient survival and well being.
Few studies have examined the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse consequences associated with non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in the adolescent liver transplant population. Our hypothesis is that a significant proportion of adolescent liver transplant recipients exhibit non-adherence to medical regimens and that certain demographic and medical condition-related characteristics can be identified as potential predictors of non-adherent behavior. Furthermore, non-adherence leads to a greater incidence of morbidity and mortality in this population as compared with the adherent subset of adolescent patients. We reviewed the charts of 97 patients from 1987 to 2002 who by December of 2002 had survived at least 1 yr post-transplant and were followed by the Pediatric Liver Transplant Service at any point during their adolescent period (ages of 12-21). Non-adherence was defined as documentation of a report of non-adherence by a patient, parent or healthcare provider that was recorded in the patient's legal medical record. Descriptive statistics were used to determine the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse outcomes associated with non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square test or the Fisher exact probability test. The unpaired Student's t-test was used to analyze the continuous variable of age at transplant. Using the inclusion criteria, a total of 97 patients represented the study sample of whom 37 subjects (38.1%) were defined as non-adherent and 60 (61.8%) were adherent. Non-adherent subjects were more likely to be female, older (>18 yr) and from a single-parent household. There was no significant difference in immunosuppressive regimen between non-adherent and adherent patients. Non-adherence was significantly (p<0.025) associated with lower socioeconomic status (SES), older age at transplant (p<0.005, 95% CI: -5.5 to -.99, Student's t-test) and episodes of late acute rejection (p<.001). Non-adherence was also significantly associated with re-transplantation and death secondary to chronic rejection by the Fisher exact test (p<0.006 and p<0.05, respectively). Non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy is a prevalent problem that is correlated with certain demographic and medical condition-related risk factors and more frequent adverse consequences in the adolescent liver transplant population. The greater incidence of late acute rejection, death and re-transplantation owing to chronic rejection in non-adherent patients suggests that non-adherence is significantly associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Further investigation to identify patients at greatest risk for non-adherence is necessary to design the most effective intervention to increase patient survival and well being.
Author Berquist, R. K.
Cox, K. L.
Berquist, W. E.
Wayman, K. I.
Litt, I. F.
Esquivel, C. O.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: R. K.
  surname: Berquist
  fullname: Berquist, R. K.
  organization: Departments Pediatrics and Multi-Organ Transplantation
– sequence: 2
  givenname: W. E.
  surname: Berquist
  fullname: Berquist, W. E.
  organization: Departments Pediatrics and Multi-Organ Transplantation
– sequence: 3
  givenname: C. O.
  surname: Esquivel
  fullname: Esquivel, C. O.
  organization: Departments Pediatrics and Multi-Organ Transplantation
– sequence: 4
  givenname: K. L.
  surname: Cox
  fullname: Cox, K. L.
  organization: Departments Pediatrics and Multi-Organ Transplantation
– sequence: 5
  givenname: K. I.
  surname: Wayman
  fullname: Wayman, K. I.
  organization: Departments Pediatrics and Multi-Organ Transplantation
– sequence: 6
  givenname: I. F.
  surname: Litt
  fullname: Litt, I. F.
  organization: Division of Adolescent Medicine, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA, USA
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17733542$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16677353$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkV1v0zAUhi00xD7gL6DcwF2CnTh2jATSNI0VaYNpKnBpuc6xcHGdYqej-_ecrGWTuJpvfCw_7_l6j8lBHCIQUjBaMTzvlhVrlCobykVVU9pWlPKWVdtn5Ojh4-A-lmXDeH1IjnNeUsoE7_gLcsiEkLJpmyMyP-2HANlCHAssUpr-JySIFt4X1wluTZjiwsS-sEPM8HszvXPhYxH8LaRiTCbmdTAoT2D92mOi_JI8dyZkeLW_T8i3T-fzs1l5-fXi89npZWlbylipuFBSObHoLSgmOe861xllXCtELayDnsu-xsE6x5Sh1hq3UMJKtlCWAbZ_Qt7u8q7TgJ3lUa88jhKwHRg2WQupeC1lh-DrPbhZrKDX6-RXJt3pf3tA4M0eMNma4HAq6_Mjh1TT8hq5bsfZNOScwD0iVE_W6KWeHNCTA3qyRt9bo7co_fif1PrRjH6IuEMfnpLgwy7BHx_g7smF9fX5_AYj1Jc7vc8jbB_0Jv3CRTWy1T--XOjvV_OrZiZv9Kz5C5CUtzE
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1093_jamiaopen_ooab008
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v23_i13_2365
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1399_0012_2011_01489_x
crossref_primary_10_12968_gasn_2007_5_2_23095
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinre_2020_08_013
crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_12671
crossref_primary_10_2196_45352
crossref_primary_10_1067_j_cpsurg_2008_05_002
crossref_primary_10_1097_MPG_0000000000003549
crossref_primary_10_1002_lt_21582
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arcped_2007_10_016
crossref_primary_10_1038_ncpgasthep0529
crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_13523
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2010_04_013
crossref_primary_10_1097_TP_0000000000001009
crossref_primary_10_5694_mja2_50833
crossref_primary_10_1111_jjns_12078
crossref_primary_10_1002_lt_23769
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1399_3046_2010_01428_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_transproceed_2010_09_087
crossref_primary_10_1093_jpepsy_jsq015
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pedn_2011_06_006
crossref_primary_10_7586_jkbns_2016_18_1_17
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOT_0b013e32834a945d
crossref_primary_10_1097_TP_0b013e318166163e
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_surg_2021_11_027
crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_13530
crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_13058
crossref_primary_10_1002_hep_21830
crossref_primary_10_1097_TP_0b013e3181ca87b0
crossref_primary_10_2215_CJN_07241009
crossref_primary_10_1542_peds_2009_0415
crossref_primary_10_1097_TP_0b013e31824b822d
crossref_primary_10_1111_ajt_13386
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinre_2018_08_017
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soard_2007_08_002
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1399_3046_2007_00809_x
crossref_primary_10_1177_1526924818781567
crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_13188
crossref_primary_10_1177_1526924817699958
crossref_primary_10_1200_JCO_2007_14_0699
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11894_020_00802_1
crossref_primary_10_1111_ctr_13880
crossref_primary_10_1002_lt_23740
crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_12899
crossref_primary_10_1111_ajt_13184
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10880_023_09970_4
crossref_primary_10_1097_TP_0000000000004557
crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_14361
crossref_primary_10_1097_TP_0000000000004556
crossref_primary_10_1002_lt_22294
crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_14446
crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_13555
crossref_primary_10_5223_pghn_2013_16_4_207
crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_14288
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cct_2015_05_013
crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_12064
crossref_primary_10_1111_petr_14362
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOT_0b013e3282f94aab
crossref_primary_10_1177_1941406411402326
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12593_014_0168_9
crossref_primary_10_1002_lt_23376
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yebeh_2015_06_040
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pedn_2020_09_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sempedsurg_2021_151104
crossref_primary_10_4155_cli_14_11
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hpb_2017_04_004
Cites_doi 10.1097/00007890-199301000-00010
10.1046/j.1397-3142.2003.00117.x
10.1097/00007890-199502270-00003
10.1097/00007890-199511000-00006
10.1097/01.TP.0000110410.11524.7B
10.1542/peds.105.2.e29
10.1046/j.1600-6135.2003.00226.x
10.1093/ajhp/60.3.266
10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00356.x
10.1007/s004670050335
10.1111/j.1399-3046.2004.00136.x
10.1097/00007890-199002000-00029
10.1016/S0031-3955(16)33815-9
10.1016/0197-0070(87)90246-4
10.1034/j.1399-3046.2000.00110.x
10.1097/00007890-199502000-00006
10.1542/peds.113.4.825
10.1016/S0163-8343(00)00098-0
10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00285.x
10.1097/00007890-200009150-00001
10.2337/diacare.24.2.234
10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00358.x
10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00352.x
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2006 INIST-CNRS
Copyright_xml – notice: 2006 INIST-CNRS
DBID BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00451.x
DatabaseName Istex
CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
CrossRef

MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1399-3046
EndPage 310
ExternalDocumentID 16677353
17733542
10_1111_j_1399_3046_2005_00451_x
PETR451
ark_67375_WNG_VMTM3H7R_H
Genre article
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
123
1OC
29O
31~
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52R
52S
52T
52U
52V
52W
52X
53G
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
A01
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHQN
AAIPD
AAKAS
AAMMB
AAMNL
AANHP
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYCA
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABDBF
ABEML
ABJNI
ABPVW
ABQWH
ABXGK
ACAHQ
ACBWZ
ACCZN
ACGFS
ACGOF
ACMXC
ACPOU
ACPRK
ACRPL
ACSCC
ACUHS
ACXBN
ACXQS
ACYXJ
ADBBV
ADBTR
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADNMO
ADOZA
ADXAS
ADZCM
ADZMN
AEFGJ
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEUYR
AEYWJ
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFWVQ
AFZJQ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AHBTC
AIACR
AIDQK
AIDYY
AITYG
AIURR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
ALVPJ
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ATUGU
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMXJE
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BY8
C45
CAG
COF
CS3
D-6
D-7
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRMAN
DRSTM
DU5
EAD
EAP
EBC
EBD
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
EX3
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FEDTE
FUBAC
G-S
G.N
GODZA
H.X
HF~
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K48
KBYEO
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRMAN
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSMAN
MSSTM
MXFUL
MXMAN
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
OVD
P2P
P2W
P2X
P2Z
P4B
P4D
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
ROL
RX1
SUPJJ
SV3
TEORI
TUS
UB1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHWMO
WIH
WIJ
WIK
WOHZO
WOW
WQJ
WVDHM
WXI
WXSBR
XG1
YFH
ZZTAW
~IA
~WT
AAHHS
ACCFJ
AEEZP
AEQDE
AEUQT
AFPWT
AIWBW
AJBDE
WRC
AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c5011-946979f6bdce9174488f8a9af56626cfed47d24518f19a0ccafb96c71b9c1e353
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 1397-3142
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 02:08:08 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 01:54:05 EST 2025
Mon Jul 21 09:11:50 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:54:01 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:12:12 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:54:31 EST 2025
Sun Sep 21 06:17:59 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords Human
Pediatrics
non-adherence
Prevalence
Digestive system
Liver
Transplantation
Homotransplantation
Adhesion
Epidemiology
Treatment
transplant immunosuppression
Surgery
Adolescent
Graft
Child
liver transplant
Language English
License http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
CC BY 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c5011-946979f6bdce9174488f8a9af56626cfed47d24518f19a0ccafb96c71b9c1e353
Notes ark:/67375/WNG-VMTM3H7R-H
istex:C1DD32AF855EBC01AA44544ED89029BDD46FD7DF
ArticleID:PETR451
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 16677353
PQID 67942778
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_67942778
pubmed_primary_16677353
pascalfrancis_primary_17733542
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1399_3046_2005_00451_x
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1399_3046_2005_00451_x
wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1399_3046_2005_00451_x_PETR451
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_VMTM3H7R_H
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate May 2006
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2006-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2006
  text: May 2006
PublicationDecade 2000
PublicationPlace Malden, USA
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Malden, USA
– name: Oxford
– name: Denmark
PublicationTitle Pediatric transplantation
PublicationTitleAlternate Pediatr Transplant
PublicationYear 2006
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Inc
Blackwell
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Inc
– name: Blackwell
References Dobbels F, Van Damme-Lombaert R, Vanhaecke J, De Geest S. Growing pains: Non-adherence with the immunosuppressive regimen in adolescent transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant 2005: 9: 381-390.
Bunzel B, Laederach-Hofmann K. Solid organ transplantation: Are there predictors for post transplant noncompliance? A literature overview. Transplantation 2000: 70: 711-716.
Schweizer RT, Rovelli M, Palmeri D, Vossler E, Hull D, Bartus S. Noncompliance in organ transplant recipients. Transplantation 1990: 49: 374-377.
Rianthavon P, Ettenger RB. Medication non-adherence in the adolescent renal transplant recipient: A clinician's viewpoint. Pediatr Transplant 2005: 9: 398-407.
Shemesh E, Lurie S, Stuber M, et al. A pilot study of posttraumatic stress and non-adherence in pediatric liver transplant recipients. Pediatrics 2000: 105: 1-7.
Frazier PA, Davis ASH, Dahl KE. Correlates of non-compliance among renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 1994: 8: 550-557.
Hilbrands LB, Hoitsma J, Koene RA. Medication compliance after renal transplantation. Transplantation 1995: 60: 914-920.
Thompson SJ, Auslander WF, White NH. Comparison of single-mother and two-parent families on metabolic control of children with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2001: 24: 234-238.
Hsu DT. Biological and psychological differences in the child and adolescent transplant recipient. Pediatr Transplant 2005: 9: 416-421.
Vasquez EM, Tanzi M, Benedetti E, Pollak R. Medication noncompliance after kidney transplantation. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2003: 60: 266-269.
Friedman IM, Litt IF. Adolescents' compliance with therapeutic regimens: Psychological and social aspects and interventions. J Adolesc Health Care 1987: 8: 52-67.
Shaw RJ, Palmer L, Blasey C, Sarwal M. A typology of non-adherence in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant 2003: 7: 489-493.
Kiley DJ, Lam CS, Pollak R. A study of treatment compliance following kidney transplantation. Transplantation 1993: 55: 51.
Falkenstein K, Flynn L, Kirkpatrick B, Casa-Melley A, Dunn S. Non-compliance in children post-liver transplant. Who are the culprits? Pediatr Transplant 2004: 8: 233-236.
Conley SB, Salvatierra O. Noncompliance among adolescents: Does it impact the success of transplantation? Nephrol News Issues 1996: 8: 18-19.
Rianthavon P, Ettenger RB, Malekzadeh M, Marik JL, Struber M. Noncompliance with immunosuppressive medications in pediatric and adolescent patients receiving solid-organ transplants. Transplantation 2004: 77: 778-782.
Litt IF, Cuskey WR. Compliance with medical regimens during adolescence. Pediatr Clin North Am 1980: 27: 3-15.
De Geest S, Borgermans L, Gemoets H, et al. Incidence, determinants, and consequences of subclinical noncompliance with immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation 1995: 59: 340-347.
Lurie S, Shemesh E, Sheiner PA, et al. Non-adherence in pediatric liver transplant recipients-an assessment of risk factors and natural history. Pediatr Transplant 2000: 4: 200-206.
Shemesh E, Shneider BL, Savitzky JK, et al. Medication adherence in pediatric and adolescent liver transplant recipients. Pediatrics 2004: 113: 825-832.
Rodriguez A, Diaz M, Colon A, Santiago DEA. Psychosocial profile of noncompliant transplant patients. Transplant Proc 1991: 23: 1807-1809.
Laederach-Hoffman K, Bunzel B. Noncompliance in organ transplant recipients: A Literature Review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2000: 22: 412-424.
Dhanireddy KK, Maniscalco J, Kirk AD. Is tolerance induction the answer to adolescent non-adherence? Pediatr Transplant 2005: 9: 357-363.
De Geest S, Abraham I, Moons P, et al. Late acute rejection and subclinical noncompliance with cyclosporine therapy in heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 1998: 17: 854-863.
Troppmann WC, Benedetti E, Gruessner R, et al. Retransplantation after renal allograft loss due to noncompliance. Transplantation 1995: 59: 467-471.
Blowey DL, Hebert D, Arbus GS, Pool R, Korus M, Koren G. Compliance with cyclosporine in adolescent renal transplant recipients. Pediatr Nephrol 1997: 11: 547-551.
Penkower L, Dew MA, Ellis D, Sereika SM, Kitutu JM, Shapiro R. Psychological Distress and adherence to the medical regimen among adolescent renal transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2003: 3: 1418-1425.
1980; 27
1994; 8
2004; 77
1998; 17
1995; 60
2004; 113
1997; 11
1987; 8
1991; 23
1990; 49
2000; 4
1995; 59
2000; 105
1993; 55
2005; 9
2004; 8
2000; 22
2003; 7
2003; 3
2000; 70
2003; 60
2001; 24
1996; 8
De Geest S (e_1_2_6_24_2) 1998; 17
Rianthavon P (e_1_2_6_19_2) 2005; 9
De Geest S (e_1_2_6_17_2) 1995; 59
e_1_2_6_12_2
e_1_2_6_13_2
e_1_2_6_10_2
Rodriguez A (e_1_2_6_25_2) 1991; 23
e_1_2_6_11_2
e_1_2_6_16_2
e_1_2_6_14_2
e_1_2_6_15_2
Rianthavon P (e_1_2_6_28_2) 2004; 77
e_1_2_6_20_2
e_1_2_6_8_2
e_1_2_6_7_2
e_1_2_6_9_2
e_1_2_6_4_2
e_1_2_6_3_2
e_1_2_6_6_2
e_1_2_6_5_2
Conley SB (e_1_2_6_18_2) 1996; 8
e_1_2_6_23_2
e_1_2_6_2_2
e_1_2_6_22_2
e_1_2_6_21_2
e_1_2_6_27_2
e_1_2_6_26_2
References_xml – reference: Shaw RJ, Palmer L, Blasey C, Sarwal M. A typology of non-adherence in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant 2003: 7: 489-493.
– reference: Shemesh E, Shneider BL, Savitzky JK, et al. Medication adherence in pediatric and adolescent liver transplant recipients. Pediatrics 2004: 113: 825-832.
– reference: Hilbrands LB, Hoitsma J, Koene RA. Medication compliance after renal transplantation. Transplantation 1995: 60: 914-920.
– reference: Rianthavon P, Ettenger RB, Malekzadeh M, Marik JL, Struber M. Noncompliance with immunosuppressive medications in pediatric and adolescent patients receiving solid-organ transplants. Transplantation 2004: 77: 778-782.
– reference: Blowey DL, Hebert D, Arbus GS, Pool R, Korus M, Koren G. Compliance with cyclosporine in adolescent renal transplant recipients. Pediatr Nephrol 1997: 11: 547-551.
– reference: Schweizer RT, Rovelli M, Palmeri D, Vossler E, Hull D, Bartus S. Noncompliance in organ transplant recipients. Transplantation 1990: 49: 374-377.
– reference: Rodriguez A, Diaz M, Colon A, Santiago DEA. Psychosocial profile of noncompliant transplant patients. Transplant Proc 1991: 23: 1807-1809.
– reference: Conley SB, Salvatierra O. Noncompliance among adolescents: Does it impact the success of transplantation? Nephrol News Issues 1996: 8: 18-19.
– reference: Kiley DJ, Lam CS, Pollak R. A study of treatment compliance following kidney transplantation. Transplantation 1993: 55: 51.
– reference: Rianthavon P, Ettenger RB. Medication non-adherence in the adolescent renal transplant recipient: A clinician's viewpoint. Pediatr Transplant 2005: 9: 398-407.
– reference: Litt IF, Cuskey WR. Compliance with medical regimens during adolescence. Pediatr Clin North Am 1980: 27: 3-15.
– reference: De Geest S, Abraham I, Moons P, et al. Late acute rejection and subclinical noncompliance with cyclosporine therapy in heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant 1998: 17: 854-863.
– reference: Falkenstein K, Flynn L, Kirkpatrick B, Casa-Melley A, Dunn S. Non-compliance in children post-liver transplant. Who are the culprits? Pediatr Transplant 2004: 8: 233-236.
– reference: Shemesh E, Lurie S, Stuber M, et al. A pilot study of posttraumatic stress and non-adherence in pediatric liver transplant recipients. Pediatrics 2000: 105: 1-7.
– reference: De Geest S, Borgermans L, Gemoets H, et al. Incidence, determinants, and consequences of subclinical noncompliance with immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplant recipients. Transplantation 1995: 59: 340-347.
– reference: Vasquez EM, Tanzi M, Benedetti E, Pollak R. Medication noncompliance after kidney transplantation. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2003: 60: 266-269.
– reference: Bunzel B, Laederach-Hofmann K. Solid organ transplantation: Are there predictors for post transplant noncompliance? A literature overview. Transplantation 2000: 70: 711-716.
– reference: Lurie S, Shemesh E, Sheiner PA, et al. Non-adherence in pediatric liver transplant recipients-an assessment of risk factors and natural history. Pediatr Transplant 2000: 4: 200-206.
– reference: Troppmann WC, Benedetti E, Gruessner R, et al. Retransplantation after renal allograft loss due to noncompliance. Transplantation 1995: 59: 467-471.
– reference: Dobbels F, Van Damme-Lombaert R, Vanhaecke J, De Geest S. Growing pains: Non-adherence with the immunosuppressive regimen in adolescent transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant 2005: 9: 381-390.
– reference: Dhanireddy KK, Maniscalco J, Kirk AD. Is tolerance induction the answer to adolescent non-adherence? Pediatr Transplant 2005: 9: 357-363.
– reference: Frazier PA, Davis ASH, Dahl KE. Correlates of non-compliance among renal transplant recipients. Clin Transplant 1994: 8: 550-557.
– reference: Penkower L, Dew MA, Ellis D, Sereika SM, Kitutu JM, Shapiro R. Psychological Distress and adherence to the medical regimen among adolescent renal transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2003: 3: 1418-1425.
– reference: Hsu DT. Biological and psychological differences in the child and adolescent transplant recipient. Pediatr Transplant 2005: 9: 416-421.
– reference: Laederach-Hoffman K, Bunzel B. Noncompliance in organ transplant recipients: A Literature Review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2000: 22: 412-424.
– reference: Friedman IM, Litt IF. Adolescents' compliance with therapeutic regimens: Psychological and social aspects and interventions. J Adolesc Health Care 1987: 8: 52-67.
– reference: Thompson SJ, Auslander WF, White NH. Comparison of single-mother and two-parent families on metabolic control of children with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2001: 24: 234-238.
– volume: 24
  start-page: 234
  year: 2001
  end-page: 238
  article-title: Comparison of single‐mother and two‐parent families on metabolic control of children with diabetes
  publication-title: Diabetes Care
– volume: 49
  start-page: 374
  year: 1990
  end-page: 377
  article-title: Noncompliance in organ transplant recipients
  publication-title: Transplantation
– volume: 55
  start-page: 51
  year: 1993
  article-title: A study of treatment compliance following kidney transplantation
  publication-title: Transplantation
– volume: 8
  start-page: 233
  year: 2004
  end-page: 236
  article-title: Non‐compliance in children post‐liver transplant. Who are the culprits
  publication-title: Pediatr Transplant
– volume: 59
  start-page: 467
  year: 1995
  end-page: 471
  article-title: Retransplantation after renal allograft loss due to noncompliance
  publication-title: Transplantation
– volume: 8
  start-page: 18
  year: 1996
  end-page: 19
  article-title: Noncompliance among adolescents: Does it impact the success of transplantation
  publication-title: Nephrol News Issues
– volume: 9
  start-page: 398
  year: 2005
  end-page: 407
  article-title: Medication non‐adherence in the adolescent renal transplant recipient: A clinician's viewpoint
  publication-title: Pediatr Transplant
– volume: 9
  start-page: 381
  year: 2005
  end-page: 390
  article-title: Growing pains: Non‐adherence with the immunosuppressive regimen in adolescent transplant recipients
  publication-title: Pediatr Transplant
– volume: 60
  start-page: 266
  year: 2003
  end-page: 269
  article-title: Medication noncompliance after kidney transplantation
  publication-title: Am J Health Syst Pharm
– volume: 9
  start-page: 416
  year: 2005
  end-page: 421
  article-title: Biological and psychological differences in the child and adolescent transplant recipient
  publication-title: Pediatr Transplant
– volume: 9
  start-page: 357
  year: 2005
  end-page: 363
  article-title: Is tolerance induction the answer to adolescent non‐adherence
  publication-title: Pediatr Transplant
– volume: 4
  start-page: 200
  year: 2000
  end-page: 206
  article-title: Non‐adherence in pediatric liver transplant recipients‐an assessment of risk factors and natural history
  publication-title: Pediatr Transplant
– volume: 8
  start-page: 52
  year: 1987
  end-page: 67
  article-title: Adolescents' compliance with therapeutic regimens: Psychological and social aspects and interventions
  publication-title: J Adolesc Health Care
– volume: 70
  start-page: 711
  year: 2000
  end-page: 716
  article-title: Solid organ transplantation: Are there predictors for post transplant noncompliance? A literature overview
  publication-title: Transplantation
– volume: 105
  start-page: 1
  year: 2000
  end-page: 7
  article-title: A pilot study of posttraumatic stress and non‐adherence in pediatric liver transplant recipients
  publication-title: Pediatrics
– volume: 3
  start-page: 1418
  year: 2003
  end-page: 1425
  article-title: Psychological Distress and adherence to the medical regimen among adolescent renal transplant recipients
  publication-title: Am J Transplant
– volume: 17
  start-page: 854
  year: 1998
  end-page: 863
  article-title: Late acute rejection and subclinical noncompliance with cyclosporine therapy in heart transplant recipients
  publication-title: J Heart Lung Transplant
– volume: 60
  start-page: 914
  year: 1995
  end-page: 920
  article-title: Medication compliance after renal transplantation
  publication-title: Transplantation
– volume: 27
  start-page: 3
  year: 1980
  end-page: 15
  article-title: Compliance with medical regimens during adolescence
  publication-title: Pediatr Clin North Am
– volume: 113
  start-page: 825
  year: 2004
  end-page: 832
  article-title: Medication adherence in pediatric and adolescent liver transplant recipients
  publication-title: Pediatrics
– volume: 77
  start-page: 778
  year: 2004
  end-page: 782
  article-title: Noncompliance with immunosuppressive medications in pediatric and adolescent patients receiving solid‐organ transplants
  publication-title: Transplantation
– volume: 22
  start-page: 412
  year: 2000
  end-page: 424
  article-title: Noncompliance in organ transplant recipients: A Literature Review
  publication-title: Gen Hosp Psychiatry
– volume: 23
  start-page: 1807
  year: 1991
  end-page: 1809
  article-title: Psychosocial profile of noncompliant transplant patients
  publication-title: Transplant Proc
– volume: 7
  start-page: 489
  year: 2003
  end-page: 493
  article-title: A typology of non‐adherence in pediatric renal transplant recipients
  publication-title: Pediatr Transplant
– volume: 59
  start-page: 340
  year: 1995
  end-page: 347
  article-title: Incidence, determinants, and consequences of subclinical noncompliance with immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplant recipients
  publication-title: Transplantation
– volume: 8
  start-page: 550
  year: 1994
  end-page: 557
  article-title: Correlates of non‐compliance among renal transplant recipients
  publication-title: Clin Transplant
– volume: 11
  start-page: 547
  year: 1997
  end-page: 551
  article-title: Compliance with cyclosporine in adolescent renal transplant recipients
  publication-title: Pediatr Nephrol
– ident: e_1_2_6_3_2
  doi: 10.1097/00007890-199301000-00010
– volume: 17
  start-page: 854
  year: 1998
  ident: e_1_2_6_24_2
  article-title: Late acute rejection and subclinical noncompliance with cyclosporine therapy in heart transplant recipients
  publication-title: J Heart Lung Transplant
– ident: e_1_2_6_8_2
  doi: 10.1046/j.1397-3142.2003.00117.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_26_2
  doi: 10.1097/00007890-199502270-00003
– ident: e_1_2_6_13_2
  doi: 10.1097/00007890-199511000-00006
– volume: 77
  start-page: 778
  year: 2004
  ident: e_1_2_6_28_2
  article-title: Noncompliance with immunosuppressive medications in pediatric and adolescent patients receiving solid‐organ transplants
  publication-title: Transplantation
  doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000110410.11524.7B
– ident: e_1_2_6_10_2
  doi: 10.1542/peds.105.2.e29
– volume: 23
  start-page: 1807
  year: 1991
  ident: e_1_2_6_25_2
  article-title: Psychosocial profile of noncompliant transplant patients
  publication-title: Transplant Proc
– ident: e_1_2_6_20_2
  doi: 10.1097/00007890-199301000-00010
– ident: e_1_2_6_9_2
  doi: 10.1046/j.1600-6135.2003.00226.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_22_2
  doi: 10.1093/ajhp/60.3.266
– ident: e_1_2_6_6_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00356.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_4_2
  doi: 10.1007/s004670050335
– ident: e_1_2_6_14_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2004.00136.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_23_2
  doi: 10.1097/00007890-199002000-00029
– ident: e_1_2_6_5_2
  doi: 10.1016/S0031-3955(16)33815-9
– ident: e_1_2_6_7_2
  doi: 10.1016/0197-0070(87)90246-4
– ident: e_1_2_6_12_2
  doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3046.2000.00110.x
– volume: 8
  start-page: 18
  year: 1996
  ident: e_1_2_6_18_2
  article-title: Noncompliance among adolescents: Does it impact the success of transplantation
  publication-title: Nephrol News Issues
– volume: 59
  start-page: 340
  year: 1995
  ident: e_1_2_6_17_2
  article-title: Incidence, determinants, and consequences of subclinical noncompliance with immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplant recipients
  publication-title: Transplantation
  doi: 10.1097/00007890-199502000-00006
– ident: e_1_2_6_15_2
  doi: 10.1542/peds.113.4.825
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_2
  doi: 10.1016/S0163-8343(00)00098-0
– ident: e_1_2_6_16_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00285.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_11_2
  doi: 10.1097/00007890-200009150-00001
– ident: e_1_2_6_21_2
  doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.2.234
– volume: 9
  start-page: 398
  year: 2005
  ident: e_1_2_6_19_2
  article-title: Medication non‐adherence in the adolescent renal transplant recipient: A clinician's viewpoint
  publication-title: Pediatr Transplant
  doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00358.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_27_2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2005.00352.x
SSID ssj0016484
Score 2.0509722
Snippet : Few studies have examined the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse consequences associated with non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in the...
Few studies have examined the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse consequences associated with non‐adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in the...
Few studies have examined the prevalence, demographic variables and adverse consequences associated with non-adherence to immunosuppressive therapy in the...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
wiley
istex
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 304
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents - administration & dosage
Immunosuppressive Agents - pharmacology
Liver Diseases - mortality
Liver Diseases - therapy
liver transplant
Liver Transplantation - methods
Medical sciences
non-adherence
Patient Compliance
Retrospective Studies
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Time Factors
transplant immunosuppression
Treatment Outcome
Title Adolescent non-adherence: Prevalence and consequences in liver transplant recipients
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-VMTM3H7R-H/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1399-3046.2005.00451.x
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16677353
https://www.proquest.com/docview/67942778
Volume 10
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9tAEF5KCqWXvh_qI91D6U3G0r6k3kKb1BQcinHS3JZ9kmKjhNiGkFN-Qn9jf0lnVrIShxxC6U2XkXZnZ7Qzs99-Q8hHZYMPwoZciiBzzoXLa-mLXDHmQuWtU-m4YLwvRwf8-5E46vBPeBem5YfoC27oGel_jQ5u7GLTyWFzzfFkb10a4aIYYDxZMIk0-l8nPZMUJAVV29-2xrIcvwHqufVFGzvVfVT6OSInzQKUF9uuF7eFpZtRbtqm9h6T2XqCLTplNlgt7cBd3OB-_D8aeEIeddEs3WnN7ym5F5pn5MG4O69_Tg53esIo2pw0fy5_G3_cXjD8TJE9yqQ7T9Q0nrpruG76q6FzRIzQZSJfn8P6U-ThOMXrm4sX5GBvd_pllHedHHInsAZbQxKu6iitdwHyQ0gJq1iZ2kQIJkvpYvBc-RIGX8WiNkOwqmhr6VRha1cEJthLsgWjDK8JtY5xE-SQsaB4DNE6gcieYWGFL21ZZkStV027juYcu23M9bV0B9SmUW3YhFPopDZ9npGilzxtqT7uIPMpGUYvYM5mCJVTQv_c_6YPx9MxG6mJHmVke8Nyrr6gwC1gChn5sDYlDR6OxzamCSerBbyu5qVSVUZetRZ2JSslSAuWEZns5M7D1j92pxN4evOvgm_Jw7YWhcjPd2RrebYK7yE6W9rt5Hd_AevPKxQ
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LT9wwEB5VILW9tPSdQsGHqresNg_bSW8IQdOWrKrVQrlZtuOIilVA7K6EeupP6G_sL-mMkw0s4oCq3nIZx57MxPP8BuC9NK5y3LhQcCfCNOU2zEUVhTJJrMsqY6VPF5QjURylX074STcOiHphWnyIPuBGmuH_16TgFJBe1XK8XUNK7S1jIymPBmhQrvt0HVlI4x5LCt2CrJ1wm1NgLr1V1nPnSit31Tqx_YpqJ_UM2Ve3cy_uMkxX7Vx_UR08henyiG19ytlgMTcD-_MW-uN_4sEGPOkMWrbbSuAzeOCa5_Cw7FL2L-B4t8eMYs158-fXb12dtj2GHxkBSGnf9sR0UzF7o7Sb_WjYlIpG2Nzjr09RBBhBcVxQB-fsJRwd7E_2irAb5hBaTmHYHP1wmdfCVNahi4heYVZnOtc12pOxsLWrUlnFuPmsjnI9RMGqTS6sjExuI5fw5BWs4S7dG2DGJql2YpgkTqa1q43lVNwzjAyvYhPHAcjlZ1O2QzqngRtTdcPjQbYpYhvN4eTKs01dBRD1lBct2sc9aD54yegJ9OUZVctJrr6PPqnjclImhRyrIoDtFdG5foNEzcAjBLCzlCWFSk6ZG92488UMl8vTWMosgNetiF3TCoHUPAlAeEG597bVt_3JGJ_e_ivhDjwqJuWhOvw8-roJj9vQFBWCbsHa_HLh3qGxNjfbXgn_AqNdLzI
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LT9tAEF5VIKFeSt91S2EPVW-OYnsfdm-oEELbRCgKlNtqnypKZCKSSKin_oT-xv6SztiOIYgDqnrzZda74xnvzOy33xDyQRrvPDc-FtyLmDFu40K4JJZZZn3ujJXVccFgKPqn7Ms5P2_wT3gXpuaHaAtu6BnV_xodfObCupPD5hrjyd6qNMJ40oF4cpMJ2DUxQBq1VFKQFeR1g9sC63LsDqrn3pHWtqpN1Po1Qif1HLQX6rYX98Wl62FutU_1tslktcIanjLpLBemY3_eIX_8Pyp4Sp404Szdr-3vGXnky-dka9Ac2L8gZ_stYxQtL8s_v35r96O-YfiJIn2Uri49UV06am8Bu-lFSacIGaGLin19CgZAkYhjhvc35y_Jae9w_LkfN60cYsuxCFtAFi6LIIyzHhJEyAnzkOtCB4gmU2GDd0y6FCafh6TQXTCrYAphZWIKm_iMZ6_IBszSvyHU2IxpL7pZ5iULPhjLEdrTTQx3qUnTiMjVV1O24TnHdhtTdSvfAbUpVBt24eSqUpu6jkjSSs5qro8HyHysDKMV0FcTxMpJrr4Pj9TZYDzI-nKk-hHZXbOcmzdI8AtYQkT2VqakwMXx3EaX_nI5h-EKlkqZR-R1bWE3skKANM8iIio7efC01cnheARPb_9VcI9snRz01Lfj4dd35HFdl0IU6A7ZWFwt_XuI1BZmt3LBv9_3LeE
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adolescent+non-adherence%3A+prevalence+and+consequences+in+liver+transplant+recipients&rft.jtitle=Pediatric+transplantation&rft.au=Berquist%2C+R+K&rft.au=Berquist%2C+W+E&rft.au=Esquivel%2C+C+O&rft.au=Cox%2C+K+L&rft.date=2006-05-01&rft.issn=1397-3142&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=304&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1399-3046.2005.00451.x&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1397-3142&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1397-3142&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1397-3142&client=summon