Clinical Outcomes Associated with Treatment Modalities for Gastrointestinal Bezoars

With technical and instrumental advances, the endoscopic removal of bezoars is now more common than conventional surgical removal. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a patient cohort with gastrointestinal bezoars removed using different treatment modalities. Between June 1989 and March 2012, 9...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGut and liver Vol. 8; no. 4; pp. 400 - 407
Main Authors Park, So-Eun, Ahn, Ji Yong, Jung, Hwoon-Yong, Park, Se Jeong, Lim, Hyun, Choi, Kwi-Sook, Lee, Jeong Hoon, Kim, Do Hoon, Choi, Kee Don, Song, Ho June, Lee, Gin Hyug, Kim, Jin-Ho
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Korea (South) Gut and Liver 01.07.2014
Gastroenterology Council for Gut and Liver
거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1976-2283
2005-1212
2005-1212
DOI10.5009/gnl.2014.8.4.400

Cover

Abstract With technical and instrumental advances, the endoscopic removal of bezoars is now more common than conventional surgical removal. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a patient cohort with gastrointestinal bezoars removed using different treatment modalities. Between June 1989 and March 2012, 93 patients with gastrointestinal bezoars underwent endoscopic or surgical procedures at the Asan Medical Center. These patients were divided into endoscopic (n=39) and surgical (n=54) treatment groups in accordance with the initial treatment modality. The clinical feature and outcomes of these two groups were analyzed retrospectively. The median follow-up period was 13 months (interquartile range [IQR], 0 to 77 months) in 93 patients with a median age of 60 years (IQR, 50 to 73 years). Among the initial symptoms, abdominal pain was the most common chief complaint (72.1%). The bezoars were commonly located in the stomach (82.1%) in the endoscopic treatment group and in the small bowel (66.7%) in the surgical treatment group. The success rates of endoscopic and surgical treatment were 89.7% and 98.1%, and the complication rates were 12.8% and 33.3%, respectively. Endoscopic removal of a gastrointestinal bezoar is an effective treatment modality; however, surgical removal is needed in some cases.
AbstractList With technical and instrumental advances, the endoscopic removal of bezoars is now more common than conventional surgical removal. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a patient cohort with gastrointestinal bezoars removed using different treatment modalities.BACKGROUND/AIMSWith technical and instrumental advances, the endoscopic removal of bezoars is now more common than conventional surgical removal. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a patient cohort with gastrointestinal bezoars removed using different treatment modalities.Between June 1989 and March 2012, 93 patients with gastrointestinal bezoars underwent endoscopic or surgical procedures at the Asan Medical Center. These patients were divided into endoscopic (n=39) and surgical (n=54) treatment groups in accordance with the initial treatment modality. The clinical feature and outcomes of these two groups were analyzed retrospectively.METHODSBetween June 1989 and March 2012, 93 patients with gastrointestinal bezoars underwent endoscopic or surgical procedures at the Asan Medical Center. These patients were divided into endoscopic (n=39) and surgical (n=54) treatment groups in accordance with the initial treatment modality. The clinical feature and outcomes of these two groups were analyzed retrospectively.The median follow-up period was 13 months (interquartile range [IQR], 0 to 77 months) in 93 patients with a median age of 60 years (IQR, 50 to 73 years). Among the initial symptoms, abdominal pain was the most common chief complaint (72.1%). The bezoars were commonly located in the stomach (82.1%) in the endoscopic treatment group and in the small bowel (66.7%) in the surgical treatment group. The success rates of endoscopic and surgical treatment were 89.7% and 98.1%, and the complication rates were 12.8% and 33.3%, respectively.RESULTSThe median follow-up period was 13 months (interquartile range [IQR], 0 to 77 months) in 93 patients with a median age of 60 years (IQR, 50 to 73 years). Among the initial symptoms, abdominal pain was the most common chief complaint (72.1%). The bezoars were commonly located in the stomach (82.1%) in the endoscopic treatment group and in the small bowel (66.7%) in the surgical treatment group. The success rates of endoscopic and surgical treatment were 89.7% and 98.1%, and the complication rates were 12.8% and 33.3%, respectively.Endoscopic removal of a gastrointestinal bezoar is an effective treatment modality; however, surgical removal is needed in some cases.CONCLUSIONSEndoscopic removal of a gastrointestinal bezoar is an effective treatment modality; however, surgical removal is needed in some cases.
Background/AimsWith technical and instrumental advances, the endoscopic removal of bezoars is now more common than conventional surgical removal. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a patient cohort with gastrointestinal bezoars removed using different treatment modalities.Methods : Between June 1989 and March 2012, 93 patients with gastrointestinal bezoars underwent endoscopic or surgical procedures at the Asan Medical Center. These patients were divided into endoscopic (n=39) and surgical (n=54) treatment groups in accordance with the initial treatment modality. The clinical feature and outcomes of these two groups were analyzed retrospectively.Results : The median follow-up period was 13 months (interquartile range [IQR], 0 to 77 months) in 93 patients with a median age of 60 years (IQR, 50 to 73 years). Among the initial symptoms, abdominal pain was the most common chief complaint (72.1%). The bezoars were commonly located in the stomach (82.1%) in the endoscopic treatment group and in the small bowel (66.7%) in the surgical treatment group. The success rates of endoscopic and surgical treatment were 89.7% and 98.1%, and the complication rates were 12.8% and 33.3%, respectively.Conclusion : sEndoscopic removal of a gastrointestinal bezoar is an effective treatment modality; however, surgical removal is needed in some cases.
Background/Aims: With technical and instrumental advances,the endoscopic removal of bezoars is now more commonthan conventional surgical removal. We investigated theclinical outcomes in a patient cohort with gastrointestinal bezoarsremoved using different treatment modalities. Methods: Between June 1989 and March 2012, 93 patients withgastrointestinal bezoars underwent endoscopic or surgicalprocedures at the Asan Medical Center. These patients weredivided into endoscopic (n=39) and surgical (n=54) treatmentgroups in accordance with the initial treatment modality. The clinical feature and outcomes of these two groupswere analyzed retrospectively. Results: The median followupperiod was 13 months (interquartile range [IQR], 0 to 77months) in 93 patients with a median age of 60 years (IQR,50 to 73 years). Among the initial symptoms, abdominal painwas the most common chief complaint (72.1%). The bezoarswere commonly located in the stomach (82.1%) in the endoscopictreatment group and in the small bowel (66.7%) in thesurgical treatment group. The success rates of endoscopicand surgical treatment were 89.7% and 98.1%, and the complicationrates were 12.8% and 33.3%, respectively. Conclusions:Endoscopic removal of a gastrointestinal bezoar is aneffective treatment modality; however, surgical removal isneeded in some cases. KCI Citation Count: 12
With technical and instrumental advances, the endoscopic removal of bezoars is now more common than conventional surgical removal. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a patient cohort with gastrointestinal bezoars removed using different treatment modalities. Between June 1989 and March 2012, 93 patients with gastrointestinal bezoars underwent endoscopic or surgical procedures at the Asan Medical Center. These patients were divided into endoscopic (n=39) and surgical (n=54) treatment groups in accordance with the initial treatment modality. The clinical feature and outcomes of these two groups were analyzed retrospectively. The median follow-up period was 13 months (interquartile range [IQR], 0 to 77 months) in 93 patients with a median age of 60 years (IQR, 50 to 73 years). Among the initial symptoms, abdominal pain was the most common chief complaint (72.1%). The bezoars were commonly located in the stomach (82.1%) in the endoscopic treatment group and in the small bowel (66.7%) in the surgical treatment group. The success rates of endoscopic and surgical treatment were 89.7% and 98.1%, and the complication rates were 12.8% and 33.3%, respectively. Endoscopic removal of a gastrointestinal bezoar is an effective treatment modality; however, surgical removal is needed in some cases.
Author Lim, Hyun
Park, So-Eun
Ahn, Ji Yong
Park, Se Jeong
Kim, Do Hoon
Lee, Gin Hyug
Kim, Jin-Ho
Choi, Kwi-Sook
Choi, Kee Don
Jung, Hwoon-Yong
Lee, Jeong Hoon
Song, Ho June
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: So-Eun
  surname: Park
  fullname: Park, So-Eun
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ji Yong
  surname: Ahn
  fullname: Ahn, Ji Yong
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Hwoon-Yong
  surname: Jung
  fullname: Jung, Hwoon-Yong
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Se Jeong
  surname: Park
  fullname: Park, Se Jeong
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Hyun
  surname: Lim
  fullname: Lim, Hyun
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Kwi-Sook
  surname: Choi
  fullname: Choi, Kwi-Sook
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Jeong Hoon
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Jeong Hoon
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Do Hoon
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Do Hoon
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Kee Don
  surname: Choi
  fullname: Choi, Kee Don
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Ho June
  surname: Song
  fullname: Song, Ho June
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Gin Hyug
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Gin Hyug
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Jin-Ho
  surname: Kim
  fullname: Kim, Jin-Ho
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25071905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001896121$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
BookMark eNp1UsFu1DAUtFAR3RbunFCOcEh4duw4viBtV1BWKqoEy9l6cZyt22xcbC-o_Xq8u6WiSJyeZc_MG43nhBxNfrKEvKZQCQD1fj2NFQPKq7biFQd4RmYMQJSUUXZEZlTJpmSsrY_JSYzXAA1lUrwgx0yApArEjHxbjG5yBsficpuM39hYzGP0xmGyffHLpatiFSymjZ1S8cX3OLrkMmjwoTjHmIJ3U7IxuSlLnNl7jyG-JM8HHKN99TBPyfdPH1eLz-XF5flyMb8oDVdNKpsWuJQNyE4h8h47JXrb4iB5DVQaiQBd39SqUdhyUCqfm761XLZoLe9NfUreHXSnMOgb47RHt59rr2-Cnn9dLTUFwSUVGbs8YHuP1_o2uA2Guz1hf-HDWmNIzoxWM2RGSN4ZtMCB0m6wOcPOymaAtuuGrPXhoHW77Ta2NzmagOMT0acvk7vKnn5qTmkNfGfm7YNA8D-2OT29cdHYccTJ-m3UVOSAaiFlnaFv_t71uOTPD2YAHAAm-BiDHR4hFPSuJDqXRO9KolvNdS5JpjT_UIxLmJzfuXXj_4m_AVD8wn8
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_17479_jacs_2019_9_2_60
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_016_4173_7
crossref_primary_10_1056_NEJMcpc2402499
crossref_primary_10_7704_kjhugr_2024_0041
crossref_primary_10_4253_wjge_v16_i2_83
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijscr_2021_105814
crossref_primary_10_1097_MPG_0000000000002779
crossref_primary_10_23934_2223_9022_2020_9_2_281_291
crossref_primary_10_4293_CRSLS_2019_00043
crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_7187356
crossref_primary_10_12998_wjcc_v3_i8_721
crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2021_691860
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_024_10741_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13126_016_0323_9
crossref_primary_10_1155_2015_450467
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2022_1020648
crossref_primary_10_17941_agd_1163438
crossref_primary_10_1093_jscr_rjad613
crossref_primary_10_1155_2015_806857
crossref_primary_10_11641_pde_97_1_76
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2016_09_142
crossref_primary_10_54229_2226_2008_2021_5_12
crossref_primary_10_1097_PG9_0000000000000056
crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2022_902701
crossref_primary_10_4166_kjg_2019_74_1_42
crossref_primary_10_4166_kjg_2023_024
crossref_primary_10_2169_internalmedicine_55_6985
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcol_2018_02_002
crossref_primary_10_4240_wjgs_v15_i5_972
crossref_primary_10_1111_ggi_12867
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anpedi_2015_11_008
Cites_doi 10.3748/wjg.v18.i9.960
10.1055/s-2002-34265
10.1055/s-2007-1001285
10.1016/S0002-9610(73)80137-0
10.1097/00004836-200411000-00007
10.3348/jkrs.2003.48.1.53
10.1016/S0016-5085(72)80123-9
10.1016/j.gcb.2008.01.045
10.1001/archinte.1987.00370030131025
10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390280026006
10.1055/s-2007-1004229
10.3748/wjg.15.2265
10.1016/S1052-5157(18)30523-3
10.1067/mge.2000.108927
10.1016/j.dld.2005.10.024
10.3748/wjg.v11.i12.1813
10.1111/apt.12141
10.1016/0002-9610(75)90380-3
10.1016/S0009-9260(05)80536-7
10.1097/00042737-200207000-00017
10.1007/s00330-002-1432-0
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2014 by The Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer. 2014
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2014 by The Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer. 2014
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
ACYCR
DOI 10.5009/gnl.2014.8.4.400
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
Korean Citation Index
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic


MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2005-1212
EndPage 407
ExternalDocumentID oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1054715
oai_doaj_org_article_2a2c574bcae04011bfe228be76f08bbf
PMC4113045
25071905
10_5009_gnl_2014_8_4_400
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
5-W
8JR
9ZL
AAKDD
AAYXX
ABDBF
ACUHS
ACYCR
ADBBV
AENEX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
CITATION
DIK
E3Z
EBD
EF.
F5P
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HYE
HZB
OK1
RPM
53G
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-680477607b9aa4dab95de8af743017c7a00bd63969a84099d636d8e478aee4dc3
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 1976-2283
2005-1212
IngestDate Sun Mar 09 07:52:36 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 27 01:14:27 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 14:12:49 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 01:46:47 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:09:07 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:42:46 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:10:28 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords Bezoars
Surgery
Endoscopy
Language English
License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c496t-680477607b9aa4dab95de8af743017c7a00bd63969a84099d636d8e478aee4dc3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
So-Eun Park and Ji Yong Ahn contributed equally to this study.
G704-SER000001589.2014.8.4.006
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/2a2c574bcae04011bfe228be76f08bbf
PMID 25071905
PQID 1549635773
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 8
ParticipantIDs nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1054715
doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2a2c574bcae04011bfe228be76f08bbf
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4113045
proquest_miscellaneous_1549635773
pubmed_primary_25071905
crossref_primary_10_5009_gnl_2014_8_4_400
crossref_citationtrail_10_5009_gnl_2014_8_4_400
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2014-07-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2014-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2014
  text: 2014-07-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Korea (South)
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Korea (South)
PublicationTitle Gut and liver
PublicationTitleAlternate Gut Liver
PublicationYear 2014
Publisher Gut and Liver
Gastroenterology Council for Gut and Liver
거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회
Publisher_xml – name: Gut and Liver
– name: Gastroenterology Council for Gut and Liver
– name: 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회
References ref12
Bae KS (ref27) 2003; 48
ref14
ref11
ref10
Escamilla C (ref17) 1994; 179
ref2
ref16
ref18
Lee SJ (ref13) 2010; 10
Byrne WJ (ref3) 1994; 4
Andrus CH (ref19) 1988; 83
McKechnie JC (ref1) 1972; 62
ref24
Erzurumlu K (ref15) 2005; 11
ref26
ref25
ref20
Kim JH (ref21) 2003; 13
ref8
Hayes PG (ref6) 1986; 29
ref7
ref9
Koulas SG (ref23) 2008; 93
ref4
ref5
Lorimer JW (ref22) 1991; 34
15793871 - World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Mar 28;11(12):1813-7
15492603 - J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004 Nov-Dec;38(10):873-6
8137021 - Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1994 Jan;4(1):99-119
4728933 - Am J Surg. 1973 Sep;126(3):421-4
22408356 - World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar 7;18(9):960-4
18487032 - Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2008 Jun-Jul;32(6-7):596-600
11115920 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Dec;52(6):784-6
1868389 - Can J Surg. 1991 Aug;34(4):331-3
16330268 - Dig Liver Dis. 2006 Jul;38(7):515-7
19437568 - World J Gastroenterol. 2009 May 14;15(18):2265-9
9689511 - Endoscopy. 1998 May;30(4):371-4
12598994 - Eur Radiol. 2003 Feb;13(2):299-304
23252775 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Jan;37(2):169-73
1903684 - Clin Radiol. 1991 May;43(5):311-3
5029071 - Gastroenterology. 1972 May;62(5):1047-51
3284334 - Am J Gastroenterol. 1988 May;83(5):476-8
12244515 - Endoscopy. 2002 Oct;34(10):845
8069423 - J Am Coll Surg. 1994 Sep;179(3):285-8
9270929 - Endoscopy. 1997 Jun;29(5):424-6
1098508 - Am J Surg. 1975 Aug;130(2):259-61
3827430 - Arch Intern Med. 1987 Mar;147(3):527-8
3779544 - Can J Surg. 1986 Nov;29(6):419-20
3985787 - Arch Surg. 1985 Apr;120(4):432-5
12169994 - Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002 Jul;14(7):801-3
18998288 - Int Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;93(2):95-8
References_xml – ident: ref14
  doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i9.960
– ident: ref9
  doi: 10.1055/s-2002-34265
– ident: ref12
  doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1001285
– ident: ref16
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(73)80137-0
– ident: ref4
  doi: 10.1097/00004836-200411000-00007
– volume: 93
  start-page: 95
  year: 2008
  ident: ref23
  article-title: Management of gastrointestinal bezoars: an analysis of 23 cases
  publication-title: Int Surg
– volume: 48
  start-page: 53
  year: 2003
  ident: ref27
  article-title: Bezoar associated with small bowel obstruction: comparison of CT and US
  publication-title: J Korean Radiol Soc
  doi: 10.3348/jkrs.2003.48.1.53
– volume: 62
  start-page: 1047
  year: 1972
  ident: ref1
  article-title: Gastroscopic removal of a phytobezoar
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(72)80123-9
– ident: ref7
  doi: 10.1016/j.gcb.2008.01.045
– ident: ref2
  doi: 10.1001/archinte.1987.00370030131025
– volume: 29
  start-page: 419
  year: 1986
  ident: ref6
  article-title: Gastrointestinal phytobezoars: presentation and management
  publication-title: Can J Surg
– ident: ref5
  doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390280026006
– ident: ref25
  doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1004229
– ident: ref11
  doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2265
– volume: 4
  start-page: 99
  year: 1994
  ident: ref3
  article-title: Foreign bodies, bezoars, and caustic ingestion
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am
  doi: 10.1016/S1052-5157(18)30523-3
– ident: ref18
  doi: 10.1067/mge.2000.108927
– volume: 10
  start-page: 49
  year: 2010
  ident: ref13
  article-title: Clinical characteristics of gastric bezoars
  publication-title: Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res
– volume: 179
  start-page: 285
  year: 1994
  ident: ref17
  article-title: Intestinal obstruction and bezoars
  publication-title: J Am Coll Surg
– ident: ref24
  doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2005.10.024
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1813
  year: 2005
  ident: ref15
  article-title: Gastrointestinal bezoars: a retrospective analysis of 34 cases
  publication-title: World J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i12.1813
– ident: ref26
  doi: 10.1111/apt.12141
– volume: 83
  start-page: 476
  year: 1988
  ident: ref19
  article-title: Bezoars: classification, pathophysiology, and treatment
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
– ident: ref8
  doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(75)90380-3
– ident: ref20
  doi: 10.1016/S0009-9260(05)80536-7
– ident: ref10
  doi: 10.1097/00042737-200207000-00017
– volume: 13
  start-page: 299
  year: 2003
  ident: ref21
  article-title: CT findings of phytobezoar associated with small bowel obstruction
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-002-1432-0
– volume: 34
  start-page: 331
  year: 1991
  ident: ref22
  article-title: Small-bowel carcinoid presenting in association with a phytobezoar
  publication-title: Can J Surg
– reference: 15793871 - World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Mar 28;11(12):1813-7
– reference: 18998288 - Int Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;93(2):95-8
– reference: 23252775 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Jan;37(2):169-73
– reference: 1098508 - Am J Surg. 1975 Aug;130(2):259-61
– reference: 3779544 - Can J Surg. 1986 Nov;29(6):419-20
– reference: 12244515 - Endoscopy. 2002 Oct;34(10):845
– reference: 4728933 - Am J Surg. 1973 Sep;126(3):421-4
– reference: 5029071 - Gastroenterology. 1972 May;62(5):1047-51
– reference: 15492603 - J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004 Nov-Dec;38(10):873-6
– reference: 16330268 - Dig Liver Dis. 2006 Jul;38(7):515-7
– reference: 12169994 - Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002 Jul;14(7):801-3
– reference: 1903684 - Clin Radiol. 1991 May;43(5):311-3
– reference: 1868389 - Can J Surg. 1991 Aug;34(4):331-3
– reference: 18487032 - Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2008 Jun-Jul;32(6-7):596-600
– reference: 3284334 - Am J Gastroenterol. 1988 May;83(5):476-8
– reference: 9270929 - Endoscopy. 1997 Jun;29(5):424-6
– reference: 3985787 - Arch Surg. 1985 Apr;120(4):432-5
– reference: 8137021 - Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1994 Jan;4(1):99-119
– reference: 11115920 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Dec;52(6):784-6
– reference: 19437568 - World J Gastroenterol. 2009 May 14;15(18):2265-9
– reference: 12598994 - Eur Radiol. 2003 Feb;13(2):299-304
– reference: 3827430 - Arch Intern Med. 1987 Mar;147(3):527-8
– reference: 8069423 - J Am Coll Surg. 1994 Sep;179(3):285-8
– reference: 9689511 - Endoscopy. 1998 May;30(4):371-4
– reference: 22408356 - World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar 7;18(9):960-4
SSID ssj0061275
Score 2.1738808
Snippet With technical and instrumental advances, the endoscopic removal of bezoars is now more common than conventional surgical removal. We investigated the clinical...
Background/AimsWith technical and instrumental advances, the endoscopic removal of bezoars is now more common than conventional surgical removal. We...
Background/Aims: With technical and instrumental advances,the endoscopic removal of bezoars is now more commonthan conventional surgical removal. We...
SourceID nrf
doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 400
SubjectTerms Abdominal Pain - etiology
Aged
bezoars
Bezoars - diagnosis
Bezoars - surgery
endoscopy
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - methods
Female
Gastrointestinal Diseases - diagnosis
Gastrointestinal Diseases - surgery
Humans
Lithotripsy - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Original
Retrospective Studies
surgery
Treatment Outcome
내과학
Title Clinical Outcomes Associated with Treatment Modalities for Gastrointestinal Bezoars
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25071905
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1549635773
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4113045
https://doaj.org/article/2a2c574bcae04011bfe228be76f08bbf
https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001896121
Volume 8
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Gut and Liver, 2014, 8(4), , pp.400-407
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQD4gLojxTaBUQFw7ZdRLHj2NbUQrSwoFW6s3yY1KqVgnazV7665nJY7WLEFw4JUps2RnPeL7J2J8Zey99XkoZVQY8hkxEcJlGR5eVZTA8VEG6fiPt4qs8vxRfrqqrraO-aE3YQA88CG5euCJUSvjgAPUtz30NRaE9KFlz7X1Nsy83fAqmhjlYEm15n09WMiOClyFBWSGgmF83lHHIxUzPxEzQzrYth9Tz9qObaZb1nyDn7ysnt1zR2RP2eMSQ6fHQ9332AJqn7OFizJI_Y99Hss-79Nu6Q42CVTqNAsSU_rymF9P68nTRRoLiGDCniF_TT27VLVsikUDbp1ZO4L7F4Pc5uzz7eHF6no2HJ2RBGNllUnOhlOTKG-dEdN5UEbSrETGgEQblOPcR4Yk0jmI8g_cyahBKOwARQ_mC7TVtA69YGngBhfK-Eh6DOQ9Y1htTe-ld4XwICZtPErRhZBanAy7uLEYYJHOLMrckc6utsCjzhH3Y1Pg5sGr8pewJDcqmHPFh9w9QS-yoJfZfWpKwdzik9jbc9PXpet3a26XFqOEzNl2hj64S9nYacYtGRpkT10C7XlnisSPiPlUm7OWgAZv-FISoDcfaakc3djq8-6a5-dETeYs8p0T1wf_4wtfsEUltWEn8hu11yzUcIl7q_FFvGr8ASCcUDQ
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical+outcomes+associated+with+treatment+modalities+for+gastrointestinal+bezoars&rft.jtitle=Gut+and+liver&rft.au=Park%2C+So-Eun&rft.au=Ahn%2C+Ji+Yong&rft.au=Jung%2C+Hwoon-Yong&rft.au=Na%2C+Shin&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.issn=2005-1212&rft.eissn=2005-1212&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=400&rft_id=info:doi/10.5009%2Fgnl.2014.8.4.400&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1976-2283&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1976-2283&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1976-2283&client=summon