Clinical Outcomes Associated with Treatment Modalities for Gastrointestinal Bezoars
With technical and instrumental advances, the endoscopic removal of bezoars is now more common than conventional surgical removal. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a patient cohort with gastrointestinal bezoars removed using different treatment modalities. Between June 1989 and March 2012, 9...
Saved in:
Published in | Gut and liver Vol. 8; no. 4; pp. 400 - 407 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Korea (South)
Gut and Liver
01.07.2014
Gastroenterology Council for Gut and Liver 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1976-2283 2005-1212 2005-1212 |
DOI | 10.5009/gnl.2014.8.4.400 |
Cover
Abstract | With technical and instrumental advances, the endoscopic removal of bezoars is now more common than conventional surgical removal. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a patient cohort with gastrointestinal bezoars removed using different treatment modalities.
Between June 1989 and March 2012, 93 patients with gastrointestinal bezoars underwent endoscopic or surgical procedures at the Asan Medical Center. These patients were divided into endoscopic (n=39) and surgical (n=54) treatment groups in accordance with the initial treatment modality. The clinical feature and outcomes of these two groups were analyzed retrospectively.
The median follow-up period was 13 months (interquartile range [IQR], 0 to 77 months) in 93 patients with a median age of 60 years (IQR, 50 to 73 years). Among the initial symptoms, abdominal pain was the most common chief complaint (72.1%). The bezoars were commonly located in the stomach (82.1%) in the endoscopic treatment group and in the small bowel (66.7%) in the surgical treatment group. The success rates of endoscopic and surgical treatment were 89.7% and 98.1%, and the complication rates were 12.8% and 33.3%, respectively.
Endoscopic removal of a gastrointestinal bezoar is an effective treatment modality; however, surgical removal is needed in some cases. |
---|---|
AbstractList | With technical and instrumental advances, the endoscopic removal of bezoars is now more common than conventional surgical removal. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a patient cohort with gastrointestinal bezoars removed using different treatment modalities.BACKGROUND/AIMSWith technical and instrumental advances, the endoscopic removal of bezoars is now more common than conventional surgical removal. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a patient cohort with gastrointestinal bezoars removed using different treatment modalities.Between June 1989 and March 2012, 93 patients with gastrointestinal bezoars underwent endoscopic or surgical procedures at the Asan Medical Center. These patients were divided into endoscopic (n=39) and surgical (n=54) treatment groups in accordance with the initial treatment modality. The clinical feature and outcomes of these two groups were analyzed retrospectively.METHODSBetween June 1989 and March 2012, 93 patients with gastrointestinal bezoars underwent endoscopic or surgical procedures at the Asan Medical Center. These patients were divided into endoscopic (n=39) and surgical (n=54) treatment groups in accordance with the initial treatment modality. The clinical feature and outcomes of these two groups were analyzed retrospectively.The median follow-up period was 13 months (interquartile range [IQR], 0 to 77 months) in 93 patients with a median age of 60 years (IQR, 50 to 73 years). Among the initial symptoms, abdominal pain was the most common chief complaint (72.1%). The bezoars were commonly located in the stomach (82.1%) in the endoscopic treatment group and in the small bowel (66.7%) in the surgical treatment group. The success rates of endoscopic and surgical treatment were 89.7% and 98.1%, and the complication rates were 12.8% and 33.3%, respectively.RESULTSThe median follow-up period was 13 months (interquartile range [IQR], 0 to 77 months) in 93 patients with a median age of 60 years (IQR, 50 to 73 years). Among the initial symptoms, abdominal pain was the most common chief complaint (72.1%). The bezoars were commonly located in the stomach (82.1%) in the endoscopic treatment group and in the small bowel (66.7%) in the surgical treatment group. The success rates of endoscopic and surgical treatment were 89.7% and 98.1%, and the complication rates were 12.8% and 33.3%, respectively.Endoscopic removal of a gastrointestinal bezoar is an effective treatment modality; however, surgical removal is needed in some cases.CONCLUSIONSEndoscopic removal of a gastrointestinal bezoar is an effective treatment modality; however, surgical removal is needed in some cases. Background/AimsWith technical and instrumental advances, the endoscopic removal of bezoars is now more common than conventional surgical removal. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a patient cohort with gastrointestinal bezoars removed using different treatment modalities.Methods : Between June 1989 and March 2012, 93 patients with gastrointestinal bezoars underwent endoscopic or surgical procedures at the Asan Medical Center. These patients were divided into endoscopic (n=39) and surgical (n=54) treatment groups in accordance with the initial treatment modality. The clinical feature and outcomes of these two groups were analyzed retrospectively.Results : The median follow-up period was 13 months (interquartile range [IQR], 0 to 77 months) in 93 patients with a median age of 60 years (IQR, 50 to 73 years). Among the initial symptoms, abdominal pain was the most common chief complaint (72.1%). The bezoars were commonly located in the stomach (82.1%) in the endoscopic treatment group and in the small bowel (66.7%) in the surgical treatment group. The success rates of endoscopic and surgical treatment were 89.7% and 98.1%, and the complication rates were 12.8% and 33.3%, respectively.Conclusion : sEndoscopic removal of a gastrointestinal bezoar is an effective treatment modality; however, surgical removal is needed in some cases. Background/Aims: With technical and instrumental advances,the endoscopic removal of bezoars is now more commonthan conventional surgical removal. We investigated theclinical outcomes in a patient cohort with gastrointestinal bezoarsremoved using different treatment modalities. Methods: Between June 1989 and March 2012, 93 patients withgastrointestinal bezoars underwent endoscopic or surgicalprocedures at the Asan Medical Center. These patients weredivided into endoscopic (n=39) and surgical (n=54) treatmentgroups in accordance with the initial treatment modality. The clinical feature and outcomes of these two groupswere analyzed retrospectively. Results: The median followupperiod was 13 months (interquartile range [IQR], 0 to 77months) in 93 patients with a median age of 60 years (IQR,50 to 73 years). Among the initial symptoms, abdominal painwas the most common chief complaint (72.1%). The bezoarswere commonly located in the stomach (82.1%) in the endoscopictreatment group and in the small bowel (66.7%) in thesurgical treatment group. The success rates of endoscopicand surgical treatment were 89.7% and 98.1%, and the complicationrates were 12.8% and 33.3%, respectively. Conclusions:Endoscopic removal of a gastrointestinal bezoar is aneffective treatment modality; however, surgical removal isneeded in some cases. KCI Citation Count: 12 With technical and instrumental advances, the endoscopic removal of bezoars is now more common than conventional surgical removal. We investigated the clinical outcomes in a patient cohort with gastrointestinal bezoars removed using different treatment modalities. Between June 1989 and March 2012, 93 patients with gastrointestinal bezoars underwent endoscopic or surgical procedures at the Asan Medical Center. These patients were divided into endoscopic (n=39) and surgical (n=54) treatment groups in accordance with the initial treatment modality. The clinical feature and outcomes of these two groups were analyzed retrospectively. The median follow-up period was 13 months (interquartile range [IQR], 0 to 77 months) in 93 patients with a median age of 60 years (IQR, 50 to 73 years). Among the initial symptoms, abdominal pain was the most common chief complaint (72.1%). The bezoars were commonly located in the stomach (82.1%) in the endoscopic treatment group and in the small bowel (66.7%) in the surgical treatment group. The success rates of endoscopic and surgical treatment were 89.7% and 98.1%, and the complication rates were 12.8% and 33.3%, respectively. Endoscopic removal of a gastrointestinal bezoar is an effective treatment modality; however, surgical removal is needed in some cases. |
Author | Lim, Hyun Park, So-Eun Ahn, Ji Yong Park, Se Jeong Kim, Do Hoon Lee, Gin Hyug Kim, Jin-Ho Choi, Kwi-Sook Choi, Kee Don Jung, Hwoon-Yong Lee, Jeong Hoon Song, Ho June |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: So-Eun surname: Park fullname: Park, So-Eun – sequence: 2 givenname: Ji Yong surname: Ahn fullname: Ahn, Ji Yong – sequence: 3 givenname: Hwoon-Yong surname: Jung fullname: Jung, Hwoon-Yong – sequence: 5 givenname: Se Jeong surname: Park fullname: Park, Se Jeong – sequence: 6 givenname: Hyun surname: Lim fullname: Lim, Hyun – sequence: 7 givenname: Kwi-Sook surname: Choi fullname: Choi, Kwi-Sook – sequence: 8 givenname: Jeong Hoon surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Jeong Hoon – sequence: 9 givenname: Do Hoon surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Do Hoon – sequence: 10 givenname: Kee Don surname: Choi fullname: Choi, Kee Don – sequence: 11 givenname: Ho June surname: Song fullname: Song, Ho June – sequence: 12 givenname: Gin Hyug surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Gin Hyug – sequence: 13 givenname: Jin-Ho surname: Kim fullname: Kim, Jin-Ho |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25071905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001896121$$DAccess content in National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) |
BookMark | eNp1UsFu1DAUtFAR3RbunFCOcEh4duw4viBtV1BWKqoEy9l6cZyt22xcbC-o_Xq8u6WiSJyeZc_MG43nhBxNfrKEvKZQCQD1fj2NFQPKq7biFQd4RmYMQJSUUXZEZlTJpmSsrY_JSYzXAA1lUrwgx0yApArEjHxbjG5yBsficpuM39hYzGP0xmGyffHLpatiFSymjZ1S8cX3OLrkMmjwoTjHmIJ3U7IxuSlLnNl7jyG-JM8HHKN99TBPyfdPH1eLz-XF5flyMb8oDVdNKpsWuJQNyE4h8h47JXrb4iB5DVQaiQBd39SqUdhyUCqfm761XLZoLe9NfUreHXSnMOgb47RHt59rr2-Cnn9dLTUFwSUVGbs8YHuP1_o2uA2Guz1hf-HDWmNIzoxWM2RGSN4ZtMCB0m6wOcPOymaAtuuGrPXhoHW77Ta2NzmagOMT0acvk7vKnn5qTmkNfGfm7YNA8D-2OT29cdHYccTJ-m3UVOSAaiFlnaFv_t71uOTPD2YAHAAm-BiDHR4hFPSuJDqXRO9KolvNdS5JpjT_UIxLmJzfuXXj_4m_AVD8wn8 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_17479_jacs_2019_9_2_60 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_016_4173_7 crossref_primary_10_1056_NEJMcpc2402499 crossref_primary_10_7704_kjhugr_2024_0041 crossref_primary_10_4253_wjge_v16_i2_83 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijscr_2021_105814 crossref_primary_10_1097_MPG_0000000000002779 crossref_primary_10_23934_2223_9022_2020_9_2_281_291 crossref_primary_10_4293_CRSLS_2019_00043 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_7187356 crossref_primary_10_12998_wjcc_v3_i8_721 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2021_691860 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_024_10741_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s13126_016_0323_9 crossref_primary_10_1155_2015_450467 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2022_1020648 crossref_primary_10_17941_agd_1163438 crossref_primary_10_1093_jscr_rjad613 crossref_primary_10_1155_2015_806857 crossref_primary_10_11641_pde_97_1_76 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cgh_2016_09_142 crossref_primary_10_54229_2226_2008_2021_5_12 crossref_primary_10_1097_PG9_0000000000000056 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2022_902701 crossref_primary_10_4166_kjg_2019_74_1_42 crossref_primary_10_4166_kjg_2023_024 crossref_primary_10_2169_internalmedicine_55_6985 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jcol_2018_02_002 crossref_primary_10_4240_wjgs_v15_i5_972 crossref_primary_10_1111_ggi_12867 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anpedi_2015_11_008 |
Cites_doi | 10.3748/wjg.v18.i9.960 10.1055/s-2002-34265 10.1055/s-2007-1001285 10.1016/S0002-9610(73)80137-0 10.1097/00004836-200411000-00007 10.3348/jkrs.2003.48.1.53 10.1016/S0016-5085(72)80123-9 10.1016/j.gcb.2008.01.045 10.1001/archinte.1987.00370030131025 10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390280026006 10.1055/s-2007-1004229 10.3748/wjg.15.2265 10.1016/S1052-5157(18)30523-3 10.1067/mge.2000.108927 10.1016/j.dld.2005.10.024 10.3748/wjg.v11.i12.1813 10.1111/apt.12141 10.1016/0002-9610(75)90380-3 10.1016/S0009-9260(05)80536-7 10.1097/00042737-200207000-00017 10.1007/s00330-002-1432-0 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2014 by The Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer. 2014 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2014 by The Korean Society of Gastroenterology, the Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, Korean College of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases, the Korean Association for the Study of the Liver, Korean Pancreatobiliary Association, and Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Cancer. 2014 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM DOA ACYCR |
DOI | 10.5009/gnl.2014.8.4.400 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals Korean Citation Index |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2005-1212 |
EndPage | 407 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1054715 oai_doaj_org_article_2a2c574bcae04011bfe228be76f08bbf PMC4113045 25071905 10_5009_gnl_2014_8_4_400 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- 5-W 8JR 9ZL AAKDD AAYXX ABDBF ACUHS ACYCR ADBBV AENEX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL CITATION DIK E3Z EBD EF. F5P GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HYE HZB OK1 RPM 53G CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c496t-680477607b9aa4dab95de8af743017c7a00bd63969a84099d636d8e478aee4dc3 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 1976-2283 2005-1212 |
IngestDate | Sun Mar 09 07:52:36 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 27 01:14:27 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 14:12:49 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 01:46:47 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:09:07 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:42:46 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:10:28 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Keywords | Bezoars Surgery Endoscopy |
Language | English |
License | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c496t-680477607b9aa4dab95de8af743017c7a00bd63969a84099d636d8e478aee4dc3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 So-Eun Park and Ji Yong Ahn contributed equally to this study. G704-SER000001589.2014.8.4.006 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/2a2c574bcae04011bfe228be76f08bbf |
PMID | 25071905 |
PQID | 1549635773 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 8 |
ParticipantIDs | nrf_kci_oai_kci_go_kr_ARTI_1054715 doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2a2c574bcae04011bfe228be76f08bbf pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4113045 proquest_miscellaneous_1549635773 pubmed_primary_25071905 crossref_primary_10_5009_gnl_2014_8_4_400 crossref_citationtrail_10_5009_gnl_2014_8_4_400 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2014-07-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2014-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2014 text: 2014-07-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Korea (South) |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Korea (South) |
PublicationTitle | Gut and liver |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Gut Liver |
PublicationYear | 2014 |
Publisher | Gut and Liver Gastroenterology Council for Gut and Liver 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 |
Publisher_xml | – name: Gut and Liver – name: Gastroenterology Council for Gut and Liver – name: 거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 |
References | ref12 Bae KS (ref27) 2003; 48 ref14 ref11 ref10 Escamilla C (ref17) 1994; 179 ref2 ref16 ref18 Lee SJ (ref13) 2010; 10 Byrne WJ (ref3) 1994; 4 Andrus CH (ref19) 1988; 83 McKechnie JC (ref1) 1972; 62 ref24 Erzurumlu K (ref15) 2005; 11 ref26 ref25 ref20 Kim JH (ref21) 2003; 13 ref8 Hayes PG (ref6) 1986; 29 ref7 ref9 Koulas SG (ref23) 2008; 93 ref4 ref5 Lorimer JW (ref22) 1991; 34 15793871 - World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Mar 28;11(12):1813-7 15492603 - J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004 Nov-Dec;38(10):873-6 8137021 - Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1994 Jan;4(1):99-119 4728933 - Am J Surg. 1973 Sep;126(3):421-4 22408356 - World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar 7;18(9):960-4 18487032 - Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2008 Jun-Jul;32(6-7):596-600 11115920 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Dec;52(6):784-6 1868389 - Can J Surg. 1991 Aug;34(4):331-3 16330268 - Dig Liver Dis. 2006 Jul;38(7):515-7 19437568 - World J Gastroenterol. 2009 May 14;15(18):2265-9 9689511 - Endoscopy. 1998 May;30(4):371-4 12598994 - Eur Radiol. 2003 Feb;13(2):299-304 23252775 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Jan;37(2):169-73 1903684 - Clin Radiol. 1991 May;43(5):311-3 5029071 - Gastroenterology. 1972 May;62(5):1047-51 3284334 - Am J Gastroenterol. 1988 May;83(5):476-8 12244515 - Endoscopy. 2002 Oct;34(10):845 8069423 - J Am Coll Surg. 1994 Sep;179(3):285-8 9270929 - Endoscopy. 1997 Jun;29(5):424-6 1098508 - Am J Surg. 1975 Aug;130(2):259-61 3827430 - Arch Intern Med. 1987 Mar;147(3):527-8 3779544 - Can J Surg. 1986 Nov;29(6):419-20 3985787 - Arch Surg. 1985 Apr;120(4):432-5 12169994 - Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002 Jul;14(7):801-3 18998288 - Int Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;93(2):95-8 |
References_xml | – ident: ref14 doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i9.960 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1055/s-2002-34265 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1001285 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(73)80137-0 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1097/00004836-200411000-00007 – volume: 93 start-page: 95 year: 2008 ident: ref23 article-title: Management of gastrointestinal bezoars: an analysis of 23 cases publication-title: Int Surg – volume: 48 start-page: 53 year: 2003 ident: ref27 article-title: Bezoar associated with small bowel obstruction: comparison of CT and US publication-title: J Korean Radiol Soc doi: 10.3348/jkrs.2003.48.1.53 – volume: 62 start-page: 1047 year: 1972 ident: ref1 article-title: Gastroscopic removal of a phytobezoar publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(72)80123-9 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1016/j.gcb.2008.01.045 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.1001/archinte.1987.00370030131025 – volume: 29 start-page: 419 year: 1986 ident: ref6 article-title: Gastrointestinal phytobezoars: presentation and management publication-title: Can J Surg – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390280026006 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1004229 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2265 – volume: 4 start-page: 99 year: 1994 ident: ref3 article-title: Foreign bodies, bezoars, and caustic ingestion publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am doi: 10.1016/S1052-5157(18)30523-3 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1067/mge.2000.108927 – volume: 10 start-page: 49 year: 2010 ident: ref13 article-title: Clinical characteristics of gastric bezoars publication-title: Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res – volume: 179 start-page: 285 year: 1994 ident: ref17 article-title: Intestinal obstruction and bezoars publication-title: J Am Coll Surg – ident: ref24 doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2005.10.024 – volume: 11 start-page: 1813 year: 2005 ident: ref15 article-title: Gastrointestinal bezoars: a retrospective analysis of 34 cases publication-title: World J Gastroenterol doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i12.1813 – ident: ref26 doi: 10.1111/apt.12141 – volume: 83 start-page: 476 year: 1988 ident: ref19 article-title: Bezoars: classification, pathophysiology, and treatment publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol – ident: ref8 doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(75)90380-3 – ident: ref20 doi: 10.1016/S0009-9260(05)80536-7 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1097/00042737-200207000-00017 – volume: 13 start-page: 299 year: 2003 ident: ref21 article-title: CT findings of phytobezoar associated with small bowel obstruction publication-title: Eur Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00330-002-1432-0 – volume: 34 start-page: 331 year: 1991 ident: ref22 article-title: Small-bowel carcinoid presenting in association with a phytobezoar publication-title: Can J Surg – reference: 15793871 - World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Mar 28;11(12):1813-7 – reference: 18998288 - Int Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;93(2):95-8 – reference: 23252775 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Jan;37(2):169-73 – reference: 1098508 - Am J Surg. 1975 Aug;130(2):259-61 – reference: 3779544 - Can J Surg. 1986 Nov;29(6):419-20 – reference: 12244515 - Endoscopy. 2002 Oct;34(10):845 – reference: 4728933 - Am J Surg. 1973 Sep;126(3):421-4 – reference: 5029071 - Gastroenterology. 1972 May;62(5):1047-51 – reference: 15492603 - J Clin Gastroenterol. 2004 Nov-Dec;38(10):873-6 – reference: 16330268 - Dig Liver Dis. 2006 Jul;38(7):515-7 – reference: 12169994 - Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002 Jul;14(7):801-3 – reference: 1903684 - Clin Radiol. 1991 May;43(5):311-3 – reference: 1868389 - Can J Surg. 1991 Aug;34(4):331-3 – reference: 18487032 - Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2008 Jun-Jul;32(6-7):596-600 – reference: 3284334 - Am J Gastroenterol. 1988 May;83(5):476-8 – reference: 9270929 - Endoscopy. 1997 Jun;29(5):424-6 – reference: 3985787 - Arch Surg. 1985 Apr;120(4):432-5 – reference: 8137021 - Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 1994 Jan;4(1):99-119 – reference: 11115920 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Dec;52(6):784-6 – reference: 19437568 - World J Gastroenterol. 2009 May 14;15(18):2265-9 – reference: 12598994 - Eur Radiol. 2003 Feb;13(2):299-304 – reference: 3827430 - Arch Intern Med. 1987 Mar;147(3):527-8 – reference: 8069423 - J Am Coll Surg. 1994 Sep;179(3):285-8 – reference: 9689511 - Endoscopy. 1998 May;30(4):371-4 – reference: 22408356 - World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar 7;18(9):960-4 |
SSID | ssj0061275 |
Score | 2.1738808 |
Snippet | With technical and instrumental advances, the endoscopic removal of bezoars is now more common than conventional surgical removal. We investigated the clinical... Background/AimsWith technical and instrumental advances, the endoscopic removal of bezoars is now more common than conventional surgical removal. We... Background/Aims: With technical and instrumental advances,the endoscopic removal of bezoars is now more commonthan conventional surgical removal. We... |
SourceID | nrf doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 400 |
SubjectTerms | Abdominal Pain - etiology Aged bezoars Bezoars - diagnosis Bezoars - surgery endoscopy Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - methods Female Gastrointestinal Diseases - diagnosis Gastrointestinal Diseases - surgery Humans Lithotripsy - methods Male Middle Aged Original Retrospective Studies surgery Treatment Outcome 내과학 |
Title | Clinical Outcomes Associated with Treatment Modalities for Gastrointestinal Bezoars |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25071905 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1549635773 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4113045 https://doaj.org/article/2a2c574bcae04011bfe228be76f08bbf https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001896121 |
Volume | 8 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | Gut and Liver, 2014, 8(4), , pp.400-407 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQD4gLojxTaBUQFw7ZdRLHj2NbUQrSwoFW6s3yY1KqVgnazV7665nJY7WLEFw4JUps2RnPeL7J2J8Zey99XkoZVQY8hkxEcJlGR5eVZTA8VEG6fiPt4qs8vxRfrqqrraO-aE3YQA88CG5euCJUSvjgAPUtz30NRaE9KFlz7X1Nsy83fAqmhjlYEm15n09WMiOClyFBWSGgmF83lHHIxUzPxEzQzrYth9Tz9qObaZb1nyDn7ysnt1zR2RP2eMSQ6fHQ9332AJqn7OFizJI_Y99Hss-79Nu6Q42CVTqNAsSU_rymF9P68nTRRoLiGDCniF_TT27VLVsikUDbp1ZO4L7F4Pc5uzz7eHF6no2HJ2RBGNllUnOhlOTKG-dEdN5UEbSrETGgEQblOPcR4Yk0jmI8g_cyahBKOwARQ_mC7TVtA69YGngBhfK-Eh6DOQ9Y1htTe-ld4XwICZtPErRhZBanAy7uLEYYJHOLMrckc6utsCjzhH3Y1Pg5sGr8pewJDcqmHPFh9w9QS-yoJfZfWpKwdzik9jbc9PXpet3a26XFqOEzNl2hj64S9nYacYtGRpkT10C7XlnisSPiPlUm7OWgAZv-FISoDcfaakc3djq8-6a5-dETeYs8p0T1wf_4wtfsEUltWEn8hu11yzUcIl7q_FFvGr8ASCcUDQ |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical+outcomes+associated+with+treatment+modalities+for+gastrointestinal+bezoars&rft.jtitle=Gut+and+liver&rft.au=Park%2C+So-Eun&rft.au=Ahn%2C+Ji+Yong&rft.au=Jung%2C+Hwoon-Yong&rft.au=Na%2C+Shin&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.issn=2005-1212&rft.eissn=2005-1212&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=400&rft_id=info:doi/10.5009%2Fgnl.2014.8.4.400&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1976-2283&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1976-2283&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1976-2283&client=summon |