Distinguishing underlying and surface variation patterns in speech perception

This study examines the relationship between patterns of variation and speech perception using two English prefixes: "in-"/"im-" and "un-". In natural speech, "in-" varies due to an underlying process of phonological assimilation, while "un-" shows a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLanguage, cognition and neuroscience Vol. 32; no. 9; pp. 1176 - 1191
Main Authors Lawyer, Laurel A., Corina, David P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Routledge 01.01.2017
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2327-3798
2327-3801
2327-3801
DOI10.1080/23273798.2017.1318213

Cover

More Information
Summary:This study examines the relationship between patterns of variation and speech perception using two English prefixes: "in-"/"im-" and "un-". In natural speech, "in-" varies due to an underlying process of phonological assimilation, while "un-" shows a pattern of surface variation, assimilating before labial stems. In a go/no-go lexical decision experiment, subjects were presented a set of "mispronounced" stimuli in which the prefix nasal was altered (replacing [n] with [m], or vice versa), in addition to real words with unaltered prefixes. No significant differences between prefixes were found in responses to unaltered words. In mispronounced items, responses to "un-" forms were faster and more accurate than to "in-" forms, although a significant interaction mitigated this effect in labial contexts. These results suggest the regularity of variation patterns has consequences for the lexical specification of words, and argues against radical underspecification accounts which argue for a maximally sparse lexicon.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:2327-3798
2327-3801
2327-3801
DOI:10.1080/23273798.2017.1318213