Understanding Clinicians’ Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: A Qualitative Review of the Most Used Frameworks
Although there is a push toward encouraging mobile health (mHealth) adoption to harness its potential, there are many challenges that sometimes go beyond the technology to involve other elements such as social, cultural, and organizational factors. This review aimed to explore which frameworks are u...
Saved in:
| Published in | JMIR mHealth and uHealth Vol. 8; no. 7; p. e18072 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Canada
JMIR Publications
06.07.2020
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 2291-5222 2291-5222 |
| DOI | 10.2196/18072 |
Cover
| Abstract | Although there is a push toward encouraging mobile health (mHealth) adoption to harness its potential, there are many challenges that sometimes go beyond the technology to involve other elements such as social, cultural, and organizational factors.
This review aimed to explore which frameworks are used the most, to understand clinicians' adoption of mHealth as well as to identify potential shortcomings in these frameworks. Highlighting these gaps and the main factors that were not specifically covered in the most frequently used frameworks will assist future researchers to include all relevant key factors.
This review was an in-depth subanalysis of a larger systematic review that included research papers published between 2008 and 2018 and focused on the social, organizational, and technical factors impacting clinicians' adoption of mHealth. The initial systematic review included 171 studies, of which 50 studies used a theoretical framework. These 50 studies are the subject of this qualitative review, reflecting further on the frameworks used and how these can help future researchers design studies that investigate the topic of mHealth adoption more robustly.
The most commonly used frameworks were different forms of extensions of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM; 17/50, 34%), the diffusion of innovation theory (DOI; 8/50, 16%), and different forms of extensions of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (6/50, 12%). Some studies used a combination of the TAM and DOI frameworks (3/50, 6%), whereas others used the consolidated framework for implementation research (3/50, 6%) and sociotechnical systems (STS) theory (2/50, 4%). The factors cited by more than 20% of the studies were usefulness, output quality, ease of use, technical support, data privacy, self-efficacy, attitude, organizational inner setting, training, leadership engagement, workload, and workflow fit. Most factors could be linked to one framework or another, but there was no single framework that could adequately cover all relevant and specific factors without some expansion.
Health care technologies are generally more complex than tools that address individual user needs as they usually support patients with comorbidities who are typically treated by multidisciplinary teams who might even work in different health care organizations. This special nature of how the health care sector operates and its highly regulated nature, the usual budget deficits, and the interdependence between health care organizations necessitate some crucial expansions to existing theoretical frameworks usually used when studying adoption. We propose a shift toward theoretical frameworks that take into account implementation challenges that factor in the complexity of the sociotechnical structure of health care organizations and the interplay between the technical, social, and organizational aspects. Our consolidated framework offers recommendations on which factors to include when investigating clinicians' adoption of mHealth, taking into account all three aspects. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Background: Although there is a push toward encouraging mobile health (mHealth) adoption to harness its potential, there are many challenges that sometimes go beyond the technology to involve other elements such as social, cultural, and organizational factors. Objective: This review aimed to explore which frameworks are used the most, to understand clinicians’ adoption of mHealth as well as to identify potential shortcomings in these frameworks. Highlighting these gaps and the main factors that were not specifically covered in the most frequently used frameworks will assist future researchers to include all relevant key factors. Methods: This review was an in-depth subanalysis of a larger systematic review that included research papers published between 2008 and 2018 and focused on the social, organizational, and technical factors impacting clinicians’ adoption of mHealth. The initial systematic review included 171 studies, of which 50 studies used a theoretical framework. These 50 studies are the subject of this qualitative review, reflecting further on the frameworks used and how these can help future researchers design studies that investigate the topic of mHealth adoption more robustly. Results: The most commonly used frameworks were different forms of extensions of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM; 17/50, 34%), the diffusion of innovation theory (DOI; 8/50, 16%), and different forms of extensions of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (6/50, 12%). Some studies used a combination of the TAM and DOI frameworks (3/50, 6%), whereas others used the consolidated framework for implementation research (3/50, 6%) and sociotechnical systems (STS) theory (2/50, 4%). The factors cited by more than 20% of the studies were usefulness, output quality, ease of use, technical support, data privacy, self-efficacy, attitude, organizational inner setting, training, leadership engagement, workload, and workflow fit. Most factors could be linked to one framework or another, but there was no single framework that could adequately cover all relevant and specific factors without some expansion. Conclusions: Health care technologies are generally more complex than tools that address individual user needs as they usually support patients with comorbidities who are typically treated by multidisciplinary teams who might even work in different health care organizations. This special nature of how the health care sector operates and its highly regulated nature, the usual budget deficits, and the interdependence between health care organizations necessitate some crucial expansions to existing theoretical frameworks usually used when studying adoption. We propose a shift toward theoretical frameworks that take into account implementation challenges that factor in the complexity of the sociotechnical structure of health care organizations and the interplay between the technical, social, and organizational aspects. Our consolidated framework offers recommendations on which factors to include when investigating clinicians’ adoption of mHealth, taking into account all three aspects. BackgroundAlthough there is a push toward encouraging mobile health (mHealth) adoption to harness its potential, there are many challenges that sometimes go beyond the technology to involve other elements such as social, cultural, and organizational factors. ObjectiveThis review aimed to explore which frameworks are used the most, to understand clinicians’ adoption of mHealth as well as to identify potential shortcomings in these frameworks. Highlighting these gaps and the main factors that were not specifically covered in the most frequently used frameworks will assist future researchers to include all relevant key factors. MethodsThis review was an in-depth subanalysis of a larger systematic review that included research papers published between 2008 and 2018 and focused on the social, organizational, and technical factors impacting clinicians’ adoption of mHealth. The initial systematic review included 171 studies, of which 50 studies used a theoretical framework. These 50 studies are the subject of this qualitative review, reflecting further on the frameworks used and how these can help future researchers design studies that investigate the topic of mHealth adoption more robustly. ResultsThe most commonly used frameworks were different forms of extensions of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM; 17/50, 34%), the diffusion of innovation theory (DOI; 8/50, 16%), and different forms of extensions of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (6/50, 12%). Some studies used a combination of the TAM and DOI frameworks (3/50, 6%), whereas others used the consolidated framework for implementation research (3/50, 6%) and sociotechnical systems (STS) theory (2/50, 4%). The factors cited by more than 20% of the studies were usefulness, output quality, ease of use, technical support, data privacy, self-efficacy, attitude, organizational inner setting, training, leadership engagement, workload, and workflow fit. Most factors could be linked to one framework or another, but there was no single framework that could adequately cover all relevant and specific factors without some expansion. ConclusionsHealth care technologies are generally more complex than tools that address individual user needs as they usually support patients with comorbidities who are typically treated by multidisciplinary teams who might even work in different health care organizations. This special nature of how the health care sector operates and its highly regulated nature, the usual budget deficits, and the interdependence between health care organizations necessitate some crucial expansions to existing theoretical frameworks usually used when studying adoption. We propose a shift toward theoretical frameworks that take into account implementation challenges that factor in the complexity of the sociotechnical structure of health care organizations and the interplay between the technical, social, and organizational aspects. Our consolidated framework offers recommendations on which factors to include when investigating clinicians’ adoption of mHealth, taking into account all three aspects. Although there is a push toward encouraging mobile health (mHealth) adoption to harness its potential, there are many challenges that sometimes go beyond the technology to involve other elements such as social, cultural, and organizational factors. This review aimed to explore which frameworks are used the most, to understand clinicians' adoption of mHealth as well as to identify potential shortcomings in these frameworks. Highlighting these gaps and the main factors that were not specifically covered in the most frequently used frameworks will assist future researchers to include all relevant key factors. This review was an in-depth subanalysis of a larger systematic review that included research papers published between 2008 and 2018 and focused on the social, organizational, and technical factors impacting clinicians' adoption of mHealth. The initial systematic review included 171 studies, of which 50 studies used a theoretical framework. These 50 studies are the subject of this qualitative review, reflecting further on the frameworks used and how these can help future researchers design studies that investigate the topic of mHealth adoption more robustly. The most commonly used frameworks were different forms of extensions of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM; 17/50, 34%), the diffusion of innovation theory (DOI; 8/50, 16%), and different forms of extensions of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (6/50, 12%). Some studies used a combination of the TAM and DOI frameworks (3/50, 6%), whereas others used the consolidated framework for implementation research (3/50, 6%) and sociotechnical systems (STS) theory (2/50, 4%). The factors cited by more than 20% of the studies were usefulness, output quality, ease of use, technical support, data privacy, self-efficacy, attitude, organizational inner setting, training, leadership engagement, workload, and workflow fit. Most factors could be linked to one framework or another, but there was no single framework that could adequately cover all relevant and specific factors without some expansion. Health care technologies are generally more complex than tools that address individual user needs as they usually support patients with comorbidities who are typically treated by multidisciplinary teams who might even work in different health care organizations. This special nature of how the health care sector operates and its highly regulated nature, the usual budget deficits, and the interdependence between health care organizations necessitate some crucial expansions to existing theoretical frameworks usually used when studying adoption. We propose a shift toward theoretical frameworks that take into account implementation challenges that factor in the complexity of the sociotechnical structure of health care organizations and the interplay between the technical, social, and organizational aspects. Our consolidated framework offers recommendations on which factors to include when investigating clinicians' adoption of mHealth, taking into account all three aspects. Although there is a push toward encouraging mobile health (mHealth) adoption to harness its potential, there are many challenges that sometimes go beyond the technology to involve other elements such as social, cultural, and organizational factors.BACKGROUNDAlthough there is a push toward encouraging mobile health (mHealth) adoption to harness its potential, there are many challenges that sometimes go beyond the technology to involve other elements such as social, cultural, and organizational factors.This review aimed to explore which frameworks are used the most, to understand clinicians' adoption of mHealth as well as to identify potential shortcomings in these frameworks. Highlighting these gaps and the main factors that were not specifically covered in the most frequently used frameworks will assist future researchers to include all relevant key factors.OBJECTIVEThis review aimed to explore which frameworks are used the most, to understand clinicians' adoption of mHealth as well as to identify potential shortcomings in these frameworks. Highlighting these gaps and the main factors that were not specifically covered in the most frequently used frameworks will assist future researchers to include all relevant key factors.This review was an in-depth subanalysis of a larger systematic review that included research papers published between 2008 and 2018 and focused on the social, organizational, and technical factors impacting clinicians' adoption of mHealth. The initial systematic review included 171 studies, of which 50 studies used a theoretical framework. These 50 studies are the subject of this qualitative review, reflecting further on the frameworks used and how these can help future researchers design studies that investigate the topic of mHealth adoption more robustly.METHODSThis review was an in-depth subanalysis of a larger systematic review that included research papers published between 2008 and 2018 and focused on the social, organizational, and technical factors impacting clinicians' adoption of mHealth. The initial systematic review included 171 studies, of which 50 studies used a theoretical framework. These 50 studies are the subject of this qualitative review, reflecting further on the frameworks used and how these can help future researchers design studies that investigate the topic of mHealth adoption more robustly.The most commonly used frameworks were different forms of extensions of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM; 17/50, 34%), the diffusion of innovation theory (DOI; 8/50, 16%), and different forms of extensions of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (6/50, 12%). Some studies used a combination of the TAM and DOI frameworks (3/50, 6%), whereas others used the consolidated framework for implementation research (3/50, 6%) and sociotechnical systems (STS) theory (2/50, 4%). The factors cited by more than 20% of the studies were usefulness, output quality, ease of use, technical support, data privacy, self-efficacy, attitude, organizational inner setting, training, leadership engagement, workload, and workflow fit. Most factors could be linked to one framework or another, but there was no single framework that could adequately cover all relevant and specific factors without some expansion.RESULTSThe most commonly used frameworks were different forms of extensions of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM; 17/50, 34%), the diffusion of innovation theory (DOI; 8/50, 16%), and different forms of extensions of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (6/50, 12%). Some studies used a combination of the TAM and DOI frameworks (3/50, 6%), whereas others used the consolidated framework for implementation research (3/50, 6%) and sociotechnical systems (STS) theory (2/50, 4%). The factors cited by more than 20% of the studies were usefulness, output quality, ease of use, technical support, data privacy, self-efficacy, attitude, organizational inner setting, training, leadership engagement, workload, and workflow fit. Most factors could be linked to one framework or another, but there was no single framework that could adequately cover all relevant and specific factors without some expansion.Health care technologies are generally more complex than tools that address individual user needs as they usually support patients with comorbidities who are typically treated by multidisciplinary teams who might even work in different health care organizations. This special nature of how the health care sector operates and its highly regulated nature, the usual budget deficits, and the interdependence between health care organizations necessitate some crucial expansions to existing theoretical frameworks usually used when studying adoption. We propose a shift toward theoretical frameworks that take into account implementation challenges that factor in the complexity of the sociotechnical structure of health care organizations and the interplay between the technical, social, and organizational aspects. Our consolidated framework offers recommendations on which factors to include when investigating clinicians' adoption of mHealth, taking into account all three aspects.CONCLUSIONSHealth care technologies are generally more complex than tools that address individual user needs as they usually support patients with comorbidities who are typically treated by multidisciplinary teams who might even work in different health care organizations. This special nature of how the health care sector operates and its highly regulated nature, the usual budget deficits, and the interdependence between health care organizations necessitate some crucial expansions to existing theoretical frameworks usually used when studying adoption. We propose a shift toward theoretical frameworks that take into account implementation challenges that factor in the complexity of the sociotechnical structure of health care organizations and the interplay between the technical, social, and organizational aspects. Our consolidated framework offers recommendations on which factors to include when investigating clinicians' adoption of mHealth, taking into account all three aspects. |
| Author | Sanchez-Vazquez, Antonio Jacob, Christine Ivory, Chris |
| AuthorAffiliation | 3 Innovation and Management Practice Research Centre Anglia Ruskin University Cambridge United Kingdom 2 University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland Brugg Switzerland 1 Anglia Ruskin University Cambridge United Kingdom |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 2 University of Applied Sciences Northwestern Switzerland Brugg Switzerland – name: 3 Innovation and Management Practice Research Centre Anglia Ruskin University Cambridge United Kingdom – name: 1 Anglia Ruskin University Cambridge United Kingdom |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Christine orcidid: 0000-0002-8817-0148 surname: Jacob fullname: Jacob, Christine – sequence: 2 givenname: Antonio orcidid: 0000-0002-1241-8098 surname: Sanchez-Vazquez fullname: Sanchez-Vazquez, Antonio – sequence: 3 givenname: Chris orcidid: 0000-0003-1567-3294 surname: Ivory fullname: Ivory, Chris |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32442132$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-51083$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index |
| BookMark | eNpdks1uEzEQgFeoiJaSV0CWEBISBOyx98c9IEWB0kpFCNRwtby748TBaxd7k4gbr8Hr8SRskhY1Pdmyv_lm7Jmn2ZEPHrNsxOhbYLJ4xypawqPsBECycQ4AR_f2x9kopSWllDHIQeZPsmMOQgDjcJJ1M99iTL32rfVzMnXW28Zqn_7-_kMmbbjpbfAkGPI51NYhuUDt-gW5DsGlMzIhX1fa2V73do3kG64tbrZwv8AhIPVklrAl51F3uAnxR3qWPTbaJRzdrqfZ7Pzj9fRifPXl0-V0cjVuhBT9GATkWOi2pKIcXqYNlwAVNbWsoeVgyornhoM0tRFYs8ZoWtRFwSSrayEl8NPscu9tg16qm2g7HX-poK3aHYQ4Vzr2tnGoOJOyEhVUtSxFiUxXXGoQaHRbaQnF4Hqzd6UN3qzqA9sH-32ys3XtQuWMVnzA3-_xge2wbdD3UbuDqMMbbxdqHtaq5BWju3yvbgUx_Fxh6lVnU4POaY9hlRQIWnDKS8gH9MUDdBlW0Q8_qyAful3AXvj8fkX_S7kbggF4vQeaGFKKaFSza2nYFmidYlRtp0ztpmygXz6g74SH3D_XfM7A |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_2196_35399 crossref_primary_10_2196_33012 crossref_primary_10_25122_jml_2024_0340 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41746_023_00982_w crossref_primary_10_2196_18655 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmedinf_2024_105779 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_022_07915_5 crossref_primary_10_2196_54636 crossref_primary_10_2196_53705 crossref_primary_10_2196_32969 crossref_primary_10_1044_2024_AJSLP_24_00100 crossref_primary_10_2196_46847 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13012_024_01400_9 crossref_primary_10_2196_40623 crossref_primary_10_1111_apa_17556 crossref_primary_10_2196_64867 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph20237112 crossref_primary_10_2196_37223 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_imu_2022_100898 crossref_primary_10_2196_52921 crossref_primary_10_1108_JSTPM_05_2022_0079 crossref_primary_10_1177_20552076221104672 crossref_primary_10_2147_IJGM_S317241 crossref_primary_10_3390_ecm2010002 crossref_primary_10_1177_20552076221104670 crossref_primary_10_2196_45920 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijmedinf_2023_105063 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12652_022_04322_w crossref_primary_10_2196_20203 crossref_primary_10_47102_annals_acadmedsg_2024341 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_imu_2022_101151 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pec_2023_107865 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph20021244 crossref_primary_10_1007_s41347_023_00363_w crossref_primary_10_1177_20552076241272567 crossref_primary_10_2196_26580 crossref_primary_10_2196_62790 crossref_primary_10_2196_24278 crossref_primary_10_2196_59908 crossref_primary_10_2196_67485 crossref_primary_10_2196_65782 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rcsop_2023_100252 crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0041_1740480 crossref_primary_10_2196_37360 crossref_primary_10_2196_63923 crossref_primary_10_2196_59073 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphar_2021_724311 crossref_primary_10_1080_17538068_2023_2189376 crossref_primary_10_2196_57474 crossref_primary_10_1007_s41745_020_00199_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_procs_2021_01_146 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12889_024_20265_7 crossref_primary_10_2196_64565 crossref_primary_10_26634_jmt_11_2_21448 crossref_primary_10_2196_46481 crossref_primary_10_2196_50337 crossref_primary_10_2196_45143 crossref_primary_10_2196_50014 crossref_primary_10_3389_fdgth_2023_1197362 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12508_023_00417_7 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jneb_2024_06_005 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmedt_2022_899143 crossref_primary_10_2196_36284 |
| Cites_doi | 10.3399/bjgp17X693137 10.1089/tmj.2014.0091 10.1177/0038038509103208 10.1186/s12911-014-0125-3 10.1109/fruct.2013.6737946 10.2196/13555 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.05.005 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T 10.2196/jmir.2159 10.1055/s-0038-1668091 10.1155/2011/342582 10.2307/249008 10.1186/1748-5908-4-29 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 10.1155/2015/136591 10.1093/annonc/mdz449.039 10.4338/ACI-2014-04-RA-0032 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00200.x 10.1007/s13142-016-0393-9 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103315 10.4082/kjfm.2011.32.6.341 10.1186/s12913-016-1756-0 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.05.008 10.1186/1472-6947-12-139 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181c0474a 10.2196/15935 10.3399/bjgp19X702401 10.3233/SHTI190111 10.1186/s12911-016-0249-8 10.1111/jan.12196 10.1080/07421222.2002.11045699 10.2196/publichealth.6896 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.02.002 10.1287/isre.3.1.60 10.1093/her/cyn019 10.1007/s00520-018-4234-x 10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 10.1186/s12913-017-2694-1 10.2196/jmir.5705 10.1037/a0022284 10.1177/1460458219892162 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000396 10.1089/tmj.2011.0066 10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003 10.1515/itit-2019-0024 10.2307/2107414 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002 10.1353/tech.0.0456 10.1007/s10726-006-9044-8 10.1007/s10916-010-9473-4 10.1111/hir.12174 10.1001/jama.289.15.1969 10.1177/1460458213492525 10.1177/001872675100400101 10.1177/1460458217725903 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000583 10.1136/qshc.2010.042085 10.1177/2055207616668431 10.1177/1357633X18784419 10.1186/s12992-017-0275-z 10.5555/54905.54915 10.3390/ijerph110201279 10.2196/jmir.7512 10.1111/hsc.12938 10.2196/mhealth.2344 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181f9dd4a 10.1186/1748-5908-4-67 10.1136/qhc.13.5.388 10.19082/2713 10.1371/journal.pone.0213067 10.1089/tmj.2017.0161 10.2307/25148625 10.1080/15402002.2017.1403326 10.1016/j.hlpt.2013.07.002 10.1186/s12911-017-0428-2 10.2196/13117 10.1037/a0028231 10.1186/s13012-014-0128-6 10.2196/jmir.8775 10.3928/00989134-20141203-01 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 10.2196/16442 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302 10.1186/1472-6947-12-149 10.2196/mental.5837 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.10.002 10.1002/2327-6924.12280 10.1145/196734.196745 10.1258/jtt.2011.101101 10.1177/0266666916684180 10.1186/1748-5908-8-106 10.2196/mental.4927 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.04.018 10.1007/s40264-016-0494-x 10.1007/s13142-011-0021-7 10.1109/hicss.2002.994120 10.1017/S0266462316000015 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.06.002 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa 10.2196/jmir.5091 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322 10.2196/jmir.8928 10.1186/s12875-017-0656-7 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2010.00358.x 10.17705/1jais.00126 10.1108/02640470710829569 10.1016/j.dss.2008.06.004 10.1186/s12909-015-0377-3 10.1002/clc.23306 10.2307/30036540 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | Christine Jacob, Antonio Sanchez-Vazquez, Chris Ivory. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 06.07.2020. 2020. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. Christine Jacob, Antonio Sanchez-Vazquez, Chris Ivory. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 06.07.2020. 2020 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: Christine Jacob, Antonio Sanchez-Vazquez, Chris Ivory. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 06.07.2020. – notice: 2020. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: Christine Jacob, Antonio Sanchez-Vazquez, Chris Ivory. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 06.07.2020. 2020 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI 7X8 5PM ABGEM ADTPV AOWAS D8T DF7 ZZAVC DOA |
| DOI | 10.2196/18072 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) SWEPUB Mälardalens högskola full text SwePub SwePub Articles SWEPUB Freely available online SWEPUB Mälardalens högskola SwePub Articles full text DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: 7X7 name: Health & Medical Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 2291-5222 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_319984828b9747e1a839a24efad8a926 oai_DiVA_org_mdh_51083 PMC7381026 32442132 10_2196_18072 |
| Genre | Systematic Review Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | Netherlands United Kingdom--UK Australia Spain |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Spain – name: Netherlands – name: United Kingdom--UK – name: Australia |
| GroupedDBID | 53G 5VS 7X7 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAYXX ABUWG ADBBV AFKRA AFPKN ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BCNDV BENPR CCPQU CITATION DIK EBS EJD FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ HMCUK HYE KQ8 M48 M~E OK1 PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY RPM UKHRP CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI 7X8 PUEGO 5PM ABGEM ADRAZ ADTPV AOWAS D8T DF7 EMOBN ZZAVC |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c494t-2425e6ad7047807af392280fb9b2d32f7835f329fbf4eb1cfa06b66191bb49923 |
| IEDL.DBID | M48 |
| ISSN | 2291-5222 |
| IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:15:27 EDT 2025 Tue Sep 09 22:07:47 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:35:18 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 11:21:44 EDT 2025 Mon Jun 30 06:52:26 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 06:02:17 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:31:56 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:11:24 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 7 |
| Keywords | health education telemedicine smartphone workflow mHealth workload technology eHealth perception public health practice mobile health telehealth electronic health record workplace |
| Language | English |
| License | Christine Jacob, Antonio Sanchez-Vazquez, Chris Ivory. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 06.07.2020. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c494t-2425e6ad7047807af392280fb9b2d32f7835f329fbf4eb1cfa06b66191bb49923 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-1241-8098 0000-0003-1567-3294 0000-0002-8817-0148 |
| OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.2196/18072 |
| PMID | 32442132 |
| PQID | 2511262026 |
| PQPubID | 4997123 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_319984828b9747e1a839a24efad8a926 swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_mdh_51083 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7381026 proquest_miscellaneous_2406303725 proquest_journals_2511262026 pubmed_primary_32442132 crossref_citationtrail_10_2196_18072 crossref_primary_10_2196_18072 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2020-07-06 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-07-06 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2020 text: 2020-07-06 day: 06 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | Canada |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Canada – name: Toronto – name: Toronto, Canada |
| PublicationTitle | JMIR mHealth and uHealth |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | JMIR Mhealth Uhealth |
| PublicationYear | 2020 |
| Publisher | JMIR Publications |
| Publisher_xml | – name: JMIR Publications |
| References | ref57 ref56 ref59 ref58 ref53 ref52 ref55 ref54 Rogers, EM (ref99) 2003 Merriam-Webster, I (ref34) 2008 (ref1) 2011 ref50 Garfinkel, H (ref26) 1967 Zhang, Y (ref78) 2015; 210 ref46 ref45 ref48 ref47 ref41 ref44 Schmeer, R (ref60) 2016; 225 Bhatta, R (ref14) 2015; 13 ref49 ref8 ref7 Giddens, A (ref115) 1984 ref9 ref4 ref3 ref6 ref5 ref100 ref101 ref40 Shachak, A (ref124) 2015; 216 Putzer, GJ (ref43) 2010; 7 ref35 ref37 ref36 ref31 ref30 ref33 Leonardi, PM (ref27) 2018 ref39 ref38 Ehrler, F (ref79) 2018; 247 Giddens, A (ref114) 2012 Morgan, G (ref107) 1992 ref23 ref25 ref20 ref22 ref21 Mohanty, R (ref102) 1990 ref28 ref29 ref13 ref12 ref15 ref128 ref129 ref97 ref126 ref96 ref127 ref11 Goffman, E (ref24) 1956 ref10 ref98 ref125 ref17 ref16 ref19 ref18 ref93 ref133 Sharma, U (ref51) 2010; 160 ref92 ref134 ref95 ref131 ref94 ref132 ref130 ref91 ref90 ref89 ref86 ref85 ref88 ref87 ref82 ref81 ref84 Wynn, R (ref68) 2012; 180 ref83 ref80 ref108 ref109 ref106 ref75 ref104 ref74 ref105 ref77 ref76 ref103 ref2 Putzer, GJ (ref42) 2012; 9 Michie, S (ref119) 2014 ref71 ref111 ref70 ref112 ref73 Higgins, J (ref32) 2011 ref72 ref110 ref67 ref117 ref69 ref118 ref64 ref63 ref116 ref66 ref113 ref65 ref122 ref123 ref62 ref120 ref61 ref121 |
| References_xml | – ident: ref49 doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X693137 – ident: ref80 doi: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0091 – ident: ref108 doi: 10.1177/0038038509103208 – ident: ref81 doi: 10.1186/s12911-014-0125-3 – ident: ref111 doi: 10.1109/fruct.2013.6737946 – ident: ref2 doi: 10.2196/13555 – volume: 180 start-page: 1218 year: 2012 ident: ref68 publication-title: Stud Health Technol Inform – ident: ref70 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.05.005 – ident: ref112 doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T – year: 1990 ident: ref102 publication-title: Processes of Technological Innovation – ident: ref63 doi: 10.2196/jmir.2159 – ident: ref129 doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668091 – ident: ref56 doi: 10.1155/2011/342582 – ident: ref89 doi: 10.2307/249008 – ident: ref109 doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-29 – volume: 7 start-page: 1b year: 2010 ident: ref43 publication-title: Perspect Health Inf Manag – ident: ref31 doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 – volume: 160 start-page: 545 issue: Pt 1 year: 2010 ident: ref51 publication-title: Stud Health Technol Inform – ident: ref62 doi: 10.1155/2015/136591 – ident: ref6 doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz449.039 – ident: ref54 doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-04-RA-0032 – ident: ref29 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00200.x – ident: ref41 doi: 10.1007/s13142-016-0393-9 – ident: ref127 doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103315 – ident: ref86 doi: 10.4082/kjfm.2011.32.6.341 – ident: ref87 doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1756-0 – ident: ref66 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.05.008 – ident: ref71 doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-139 – ident: ref57 doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181c0474a – volume: 13 start-page: 149 issue: 30 year: 2015 ident: ref14 publication-title: J Nepal Health Res Counc – ident: ref30 doi: 10.2196/15935 – ident: ref22 doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X702401 – volume: 247 start-page: 506 year: 2018 ident: ref79 publication-title: Stud Health Technol Inform – ident: ref128 doi: 10.3233/SHTI190111 – ident: ref69 doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0249-8 – ident: ref16 doi: 10.1111/jan.12196 – ident: ref95 doi: 10.1080/07421222.2002.11045699 – ident: ref11 doi: 10.2196/publichealth.6896 – ident: ref58 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.02.002 – ident: ref123 doi: 10.1287/isre.3.1.60 – ident: ref118 doi: 10.1093/her/cyn019 – ident: ref5 doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4234-x – ident: ref90 doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 – ident: ref15 doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2694-1 – ident: ref77 doi: 10.2196/jmir.5705 – ident: ref105 doi: 10.1037/a0022284 – ident: ref17 doi: 10.1177/1460458219892162 – ident: ref38 doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000396 – ident: ref83 doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0066 – ident: ref103 doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.002003 – ident: ref10 doi: 10.1515/itit-2019-0024 – ident: ref113 doi: 10.2307/2107414 – ident: ref93 doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x – ident: ref91 doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002 – ident: ref25 doi: 10.1353/tech.0.0456 – ident: ref28 doi: 10.1007/s10726-006-9044-8 – year: 2011 ident: ref32 publication-title: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions – ident: ref72 doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9473-4 – volume: 210 start-page: 793 year: 2015 ident: ref78 publication-title: Stud Health Technol Inform – ident: ref61 doi: 10.1111/hir.12174 – ident: ref101 doi: 10.1001/jama.289.15.1969 – ident: ref37 doi: 10.1177/1460458213492525 – ident: ref106 doi: 10.1177/001872675100400101 – ident: ref76 doi: 10.1177/1460458217725903 – ident: ref45 doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000583 – ident: ref132 doi: 10.1136/qshc.2010.042085 – volume: 9 start-page: 1b year: 2012 ident: ref42 publication-title: Perspect Health Inf Manag – volume: 216 start-page: 506 year: 2015 ident: ref124 publication-title: Stud Health Technol Inform – ident: ref47 doi: 10.1177/2055207616668431 – ident: ref48 doi: 10.1177/1357633X18784419 – ident: ref19 doi: 10.1186/s12992-017-0275-z – ident: ref100 doi: 10.5555/54905.54915 – ident: ref21 doi: 10.3390/ijerph110201279 – ident: ref12 doi: 10.2196/jmir.7512 – ident: ref23 doi: 10.1111/hsc.12938 – ident: ref84 doi: 10.2196/mhealth.2344 – ident: ref36 doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181f9dd4a – ident: ref96 doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-67 – ident: ref134 doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.5.388 – ident: ref126 doi: 10.19082/2713 – ident: ref117 – ident: ref9 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213067 – ident: ref35 doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0161 – ident: ref121 doi: 10.2307/25148625 – ident: ref40 doi: 10.1080/15402002.2017.1403326 – ident: ref131 doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2013.07.002 – volume: 225 start-page: 944 year: 2016 ident: ref60 publication-title: Stud Health Technol Inform – ident: ref85 doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0428-2 – ident: ref125 doi: 10.2196/13117 – ident: ref13 doi: 10.1037/a0028231 – year: 1956 ident: ref24 publication-title: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life – ident: ref75 doi: 10.1186/s13012-014-0128-6 – ident: ref130 doi: 10.2196/jmir.8775 – start-page: 279 year: 2018 ident: ref27 publication-title: The Routledge Companion to Qualitative Research in Organization Studies – ident: ref64 doi: 10.3928/00989134-20141203-01 – ident: ref104 doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50 – ident: ref8 doi: 10.2196/16442 – ident: ref120 doi: 10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302 – year: 1967 ident: ref26 publication-title: Studies in Ethnomethodology – ident: ref55 doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-149 – ident: ref53 doi: 10.2196/mental.5837 – ident: ref4 doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.10.002 – year: 2008 ident: ref34 publication-title: The Merriam-Webster Dictionary – ident: ref50 doi: 10.1002/2327-6924.12280 – ident: ref110 doi: 10.1145/196734.196745 – ident: ref73 doi: 10.1258/jtt.2011.101101 – ident: ref82 doi: 10.1177/0266666916684180 – ident: ref46 doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-106 – ident: ref39 doi: 10.2196/mental.4927 – ident: ref92 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 – ident: ref18 doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.04.018 – year: 2014 ident: ref119 publication-title: The Behaviour Change Wheel: A Guide to Designing Interventions – ident: ref65 doi: 10.1007/s40264-016-0494-x – year: 2012 ident: ref114 publication-title: The Consequences of Modernity – year: 1992 ident: ref107 publication-title: The Social Engagement of Social Science, a Tavistock Anthology, Volume 3: The Socio-Ecological Perspective – ident: ref133 doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0021-7 – ident: ref116 doi: 10.1109/hicss.2002.994120 – ident: ref74 doi: 10.1017/S0266462316000015 – ident: ref3 doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2017.06.002 – ident: ref33 doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa – ident: ref67 doi: 10.2196/jmir.5091 – ident: ref122 doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322 – ident: ref44 doi: 10.2196/jmir.8928 – ident: ref52 doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0656-7 – ident: ref20 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2010.00358.x – year: 2003 ident: ref99 publication-title: Diffusion of Innovations. Fifth Edition – ident: ref88 doi: 10.17705/1jais.00126 – year: 1984 ident: ref115 publication-title: The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration – ident: ref98 doi: 10.1108/02640470710829569 – ident: ref97 doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2008.06.004 – ident: ref59 doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0377-3 – ident: ref7 doi: 10.1002/clc.23306 – year: 2011 ident: ref1 publication-title: mHealth: New Horizons for Health through Mobile Technologies – ident: ref94 doi: 10.2307/30036540 |
| SSID | ssj0001125295 |
| Score | 2.3908963 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | Although there is a push toward encouraging mobile health (mHealth) adoption to harness its potential, there are many challenges that sometimes go beyond the... Background: Although there is a push toward encouraging mobile health (mHealth) adoption to harness its potential, there are many challenges that sometimes go... BackgroundAlthough there is a push toward encouraging mobile health (mHealth) adoption to harness its potential, there are many challenges that sometimes go... |
| SourceID | doaj swepub pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | e18072 |
| SubjectTerms | Ambulatory care Biomedical Technology Data collection eHealth electronic health record Gene expression health education Humans mHealth mobile health Multimedia Original Paper Patients perception Practice Patterns, Physicians public health practice smartphone technology Technology Acceptance Model telehealth Telemedicine Workflow workload Workloads workplace |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1bS8MwFA7iwxBEvFsvI8J8LNvS9ObbvIwhzKdN9laSNmGD2Yqd7_4N_56_xHOSbqwq-OJrk7RpzknO_QshLZ76goe-dH2hpMs9HrtxFnmuwkLKrsiiIMBq5OFjMBjzh4k_WbvqC3PCLDywXbi2h0VgHOwCiZqv6gqQ6IJxpeE9ImYGbBvE2JoxZbwrILdZ7DfINuY6A5e1u1EnZDXhYzD6f1Msf-ZH1lBEjeTp75KdSmWkPTvVPbKh8n3SGFZB8QPyPF4vUKEW6ROoXn6-f9BeVphDgRaaDgsJZwC1lUd0VBTz8pr2qIXRMADg1IYKsDMohjCgXNBxqTLaX-ZwlYdk3L8f3Q7c6hYFN-UxX2DM11eByELE4emEQoNGxKKOlrFkmcc0un60x2ItNYeDO9WiE0iQ2nFXSjCHmHdENvMiVyeYBqXMVUOMp0aoSabRrSw4Bh99KR3SWi5vklYQ43jTxTwBUwOpkBgqOKS56vZiMTW-d7hB2qwaEQLbPADGSCrGSP5iDIecLymbVPuyTNCgQgh-bL5cNcOOwjCJyFXxBn044pB5IfMdcmwZYTUTUD85AwPeIWGNRWpTrbfks6lB7Q4RSw2_e2WZqTbkbvbUM3_3nE0TOCYj7_Q_1uCMbDH0D5gUx3OyuXh9UxegRC1k0-yXL_9aGmc priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1LT9wwEB61VEKVKkRfNLzkSvQYsXGcOOGCFugKVdqe2GpvkZ3YBQliSpZ7_0b_Xn8JM453adqKa-xonZ3xvOcbgANRZ0rITMeZMjoWqSjjsinS2FAjZaKaIs-pG3n6NT-fiS_zbB4Cbl0oq1zKRC-oG1dTjPyQTGECT-f58e2PmKZGUXY1jNB4Di8SNFWIq-VcPsZYUHvzMluHV1TxjLx2mBQjyQcqyCP1_8-8_LdKcoAl6vXPZBM2guHIxj2lX8Mz076B9WlIjb-Fm9mfbSqsx_tE2ne_f_5i48Z50cCcZVOnURKwvv-IXTh33R2xMevBNDwMOOsTBrQZzUN8oVuwWWcaNllWcnXvYDb5fHF6HodZCnEtSrGgzG9mctVIQuMZSWXRLuLFyOpS8ybllgJANuWl1Vag-K6tGuUadXeZaI1OEU_fw1rrWvOBiqGMHzjERe1Vm-aWgstKUAoy0zqCg-XfW9UBaJzmXVxX6HAQFSpPhQj2V9tue2SNvzecEG1WiwSE7R-4u-9VuFdVSj2CAt1GTY6RSRQafIoLY5HNVMnzCHaXlK3C7eyqR16K4ONqGe8VJUtUa9w97hGERpZKnkWw1TPC6iRohAqObnwEcsAig6MOV9qrS4_dLQlRjX73U89Mg1fOrr6N_dfdNJcVCssi3X76-DvwkpP_70sYd2FtcXdv9tBIWuh9fxMeAF2VEpw priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
| Title | Understanding Clinicians’ Adoption of Mobile Health Tools: A Qualitative Review of the Most Used Frameworks |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32442132 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2511262026 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2406303725 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7381026 https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-51083 https://doaj.org/article/319984828b9747e1a839a24efad8a926 |
| Volume | 8 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVAFT databaseName: Open Access Digital Library customDbUrl: eissn: 2291-5222 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0001125295 issn: 2291-5222 databaseCode: KQ8 dateStart: 20130101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://grweb.coalliance.org/oadl/oadl.html providerName: Colorado Alliance of Research Libraries – providerCode: PRVAON databaseName: Open Access Journals customDbUrl: eissn: 2291-5222 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0001125295 issn: 2291-5222 databaseCode: DOA dateStart: 20130101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.doaj.org/ providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – providerCode: PRVBFR databaseName: Free Medical Journals - Free Access to All customDbUrl: eissn: 2291-5222 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0001125295 issn: 2291-5222 databaseCode: DIK dateStart: 20130101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://www.freemedicaljournals.com providerName: Flying Publisher – providerCode: PRVHPJ databaseName: ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources customDbUrl: eissn: 2291-5222 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0001125295 issn: 2291-5222 databaseCode: M~E dateStart: 20130101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://road.issn.org providerName: ISSN International Centre – providerCode: PRVAQN databaseName: PubMed Central (Free e-resource, activated by CARLI) customDbUrl: eissn: 2291-5222 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0001125295 issn: 2291-5222 databaseCode: RPM dateStart: 20130101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ providerName: National Library of Medicine – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 2291-5222 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0001125295 issn: 2291-5222 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20130101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 eissn: 2291-5222 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0001125295 issn: 2291-5222 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20130101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVFZP databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access customDbUrl: eissn: 2291-5222 dateEnd: 20250131 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0001125295 issn: 2291-5222 databaseCode: M48 dateStart: 20130601 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: http://journals.scholarsportal.info providerName: Scholars Portal |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3fa9swED62FspgjO63t9Z40LEnb_FZtqyHMdKtpQxSxmhG34xkS20hs9skhfa_353shHrrw14jGTun09190t13AHuiyrSQmYkzbU0sUqFiVRdpbLmQMtF1kedcjTw5zo-m4vtpdiebsBfg4l5ox_2kpvPZx5ur2y-04T9zGjMp0KekGEmywpvkjJAVe9JH-P6YhRw4-t4riCoh2IW4BY8HTw48kifuvy_a_DdpckAt6t3R4TY86ePIaNwt_FN4YJtnsDXpb8qfg5rerVqJOvpPUoXFh2hct95ORK2LJq0hsxB1xUjRSdvOFi9genhw8vUo7tskxJVQYsmXupnNdS2ZaGcktaOQB4uRM8pgnaLjsx2XonLGCbLMldOj3JBbVokxhHcwfQkbTdvY15znZH0vIRSV91oGHZ8ba8G3i5kxAeytRFVWPYc4t7KYlYQlWKKll2gA4XraZUea8feEfZbzepA5rv0P7fys7LdMmXL5nyBEaBjz2ERTLKdRWEcapBXmAeysVqlc6U3JiIk59nn43XqYtgzfg-jGttc0RzDRWCoxC-BVt6jrL6H4UiAh9ADkYLkHnzocaS7OPS23ZLI0fu_7TjEGj3y7-DX2_-53fV6SHSzSN_857y08Qsb4Pk1xBzaW82u7S4HQ0oTwUJ7KEDb3D45__Az9cULo1f8PD0EImw |
| linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1fT9RAEJ8QTNDEGPyHVcQ1gceG6-62vZoQcoiXQzie7sy91d12V0igRXrE-ObX4Ev4ofwkzGzbw6rxjdfuNt3uzM7O398AbMosVDIOtR8qo30pZOIneV_4hgopA5X3o4iqkcfH0WgqP87C2RL8bGthKK2ylYlOUOdlRj7ybVKFCTydR7sXX33qGkXR1baFRs0Wh-b7NzTZqp2DfaTvFufDD5P3I7_pKuBnMpFzioGGJlJ5TLg0vVhZ1BB4v2d1onkuuCVXiBU8sdpKFGSZVb1I4y2WBFqjeUBAByjy70nRk4TVH8_iW58Oags8CVfgIWVYI29vB_gF3rnyXGeAf6mzf2dldrBL3X03XIVHjaLKBjVnPYYlUzyBlXETin8K59Pfy2JYjS-KvFb9-nHNBnnpRBErLRuXGiUPq-ud2KQsz6p3bMBq8A4HO87qAAVNRnUUX6jmbFqZnA3bzLHqGUzvZJefw3JRFuYFJV8Z1-CIy8xdpZpbcmYrSSHPUGsPNtvtTbMG2Jz6a5ylaOAQFVJHBQ82FtMuaiSPPyfsEW0WgwS87R6Ul1_S5hyngmoSJZqpmgwxEyhUMBWXxiJbq4RHHqy3lE0baVClt7zrwdvFMJ5jCs6owpRXOEcS-pmIeejBWs0Ii5Wg0it5IHCFcYdFOkvtjhSnJw4rPCYEN_ruVs1MnVf2Tz8N3N-d5ycpCue-ePn_5b-B-6PJ-Cg9Ojg-fAUPOPkeXPrkOizPL6_Ma1TQ5nrDnQoGn-_6GN4ArPVOlA |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3dbtMwFD6ahlQhoYl_so1hpO0yamM7SYOEUKFUG6MTFyvqXbATm03akm3phLjba-xVeByehHOcpCOAuNtt7Shuzo_P73cAtmUWKhmH2g-V0b4UMvGTfCh8Q42UgcqHUUTdyNODaHcmP8zD-Qr8aHthqKyy1YlOUedlRjHyPpnCBJ7Oo75tyiI-jSdvzs59miBFmdZ2nEbNIvvm-zd036rXe2Ok9Q7nk_eH73b9ZsKAn8lELigfGppI5TFh1AxiZdFa4MOB1YnmueCWwiJW8MRqK1GpZVYNIo03WhJoja4CgR6g-r8TCymonCyexzfxHbQceBL24B5VWyOf9wN8A-9cf25KwL9M278rNDs4pu7um9yHtcZoZaOayx7AiikeQm_apOUfwens9xYZVmONIt9VP6-u2SgvnVpipWXTUqMWYnXvEzssy5PqFRuxGsjDQZCzOllBm9E0xQeqBZtVJmeTtoqsegyzW_nKT2C1KAvzjAqxjBt2xGXmrlXNLQW2laT0Z6i1B9vt502zBuScZm2cpOjsEBVSRwUPtpbbzmpUjz83vCXaLBcJhNv9UF58TRuZTgX1J0p0WTU5ZSZQaGwqLo1FFlcJjzzYbCmbNpqhSm_42IOXy2WUaUrUqMKUl7hHEhKaiHnowdOaEZYnQQNY8kDgCeMOi3SO2l0pjo8cbnhMaG703p2amTqPjI8_j9y_O82PUlTUQ7H-_-O_gB4KYPpx72B_A-5yCkO4SspNWF1cXJrnaKst9JYTCgZfblsKfwE7NVLP |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding+Clinicians%27+Adoption+of+Mobile+Health+Tools&rft.jtitle=JMIR+mHealth+and+uHealth&rft.au=Jacob%2C+Christine&rft.au=Sanchez-Vazquez%2C+Antonio&rft.au=Ivory%2C+Chris&rft.date=2020-07-06&rft.issn=2291-5222&rft.eissn=2291-5222&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=7&rft_id=info:doi/10.2196%2F18072&rft.externalDocID=oai_DiVA_org_mdh_51083 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2291-5222&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2291-5222&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2291-5222&client=summon |