Improving depth-of-interaction resolution in pixellated PET detectors using neural networks

Parallax error is a common issue in high-resolution preclinical positron emission tomography (PET) scanners as well as in clinical scanners that have a long axial field of view (FOV), which increases estimation uncertainty of the annihilation position and therefore degrades the spatial resolution. A...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPhysics in medicine & biology Vol. 65; no. 17; pp. 175017 - 175027
Main Authors Zatcepin, Artem, Pizzichemi, Marco, Polesel, Andrea, Paganoni, Marco, Auffray, Etiennette, Ziegler, Sibylle I, Omidvari, Negar
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published IOP Publishing 07.09.2020
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0031-9155
1361-6560
1361-6560
DOI10.1088/1361-6560/ab9efc

Cover

More Information
Summary:Parallax error is a common issue in high-resolution preclinical positron emission tomography (PET) scanners as well as in clinical scanners that have a long axial field of view (FOV), which increases estimation uncertainty of the annihilation position and therefore degrades the spatial resolution. A way to address this issue is depth-of-interaction (DOI) estimation. In this work we propose two machine learning-based algorithms, a dense and a convolutional neural network (NN), as well as a multiple linear regression (MLR)-based method to estimate DOI in depolished PET detector arrays with single-sided readout. The algorithms were tested on an 8× 8 array of 1.53× 1.53× 15 mm3 crystals and a 4× 4 array of 3.1× 3.1× 15 mm3 crystals, both made of Ce:LYSO scintillators and coupled to a 4× 4 array of 3× 3 mm3 silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs). Using the conventional linear DOI estimation method resulted in an average DOI resolution of 3.76 mm and 3.51 mm FWHM for the 8× 8 and the 4× 4 arrays, respectively. Application of MLR outperformed the conventional method with average DOI resolutions of 3.25 mm and 3.33 mm FWHM, respectively. Using the machine learning approaches further improved the DOI resolution, to an average DOI resolution of 2.99 mm and 3.14 mm FWHM, respectively, and additionally improved the uniformity of the DOI resolution in both arrays. Lastly, preliminary results obtained by using only a section of the crystal array for training showed that the NN-based methods could be used to reduce the number of calibration steps required for each detector array.
Bibliography:PMB-110041.R1
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0031-9155
1361-6560
1361-6560
DOI:10.1088/1361-6560/ab9efc