Interinstrument Reliability of the Jamar Electronic Dynamometer and Pinch Gauge Compared With the Jamar Hydraulic Dynamometer and B&L Engineering Mechanical Pinch Gauge
OBJECTIVE. This study sought to determine interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the commonly used Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge. METHOD. Twenty men and 20 women were tested for grip strength with the...
Saved in:
Published in | The American journal of occupational therapy Vol. 67; no. 4; pp. 480 - 483 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
American Occupational Therapy Association
01.07.2013
American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0272-9490 1943-7676 1943-7676 |
DOI | 10.5014/ajot.2013.007351 |
Cover
Abstract | OBJECTIVE. This study sought to determine interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the commonly used Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge.
METHOD. Twenty men and 20 women were tested for grip strength with the two different dynamometers, and 17 men and 25 women were tested for lateral pinch strength with the two different pinch gauges.
RESULTS. Grip strength measurements were approximately 10% higher with the hydraulic dynamometer, and lateral pinch strength measurements were approximately 18% higher with the mechanical pinch gauge. Paired t tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for statistical analyses. The two-tailed p value was <.0001, and the ICC indicated poor to moderate reliability.
CONCLUSION. When retesting patients, it is recommended that occupational therapists use the same instrument to measure hand strength because interinstrument reliability may be lacking. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Objective: This study sought to determine interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the commonly used Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge. Method: Twenty men and 20 women were tested for grip strength with the two different dynamometers, and 17 men and 25 women were tested for lateral pinch strength with the two different pinch gauges. Results: Grip strength measurements were approximately 10% higher with the hydraulic dynamometer, and lateral pinch strength measurements were approximately 18% higher with the mechanical pinch gauge. Paired tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for statistical analyses. The two-tailed p value was <.0001, and the ICC indicated poor to moderate reliability. Conclusion: When retesting patients, it is recommended that occupational therapists use the same instrument to measure hand strength because interinstrument reliability may be lacking. OBJECTIVE. This study sought to determine interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the commonly used Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge. METHOD. Twenty men and 20 women were tested for grip strength with the two different dynamometers, and 17 men and 25 women were tested for lateral pinch strength with the two different pinch gauges. RESULTS. Grip strength measurements were approximately 10% higher with the hydraulic dynamometer, and lateral pinch strength measurements were approximately 18% higher with the mechanical pinch gauge. Paired ttests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for statistical analyses. The two-tailed p value was <.0001, and the ICC indicated poor to moderate reliability. CONCLUSION. When retesting patients, it is recommended that occupational therapists use the same instrument to measure hand strength because interinstrument reliability may be lacking. King, T. I., II (2013). Brief Report--Interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67,480-483. OBJECTIVE. This study sought to determine interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the commonly used Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge. METHOD. Twenty men and 20 women were tested for grip strength with the two different dynamometers, and 17 men and 25 women were tested for lateral pinch strength with the two different pinch gauges. RESULTS. Grip strength measurements were approximately 10% higher with the hydraulic dynamometer, and lateral pinch strength measurements were approximately 18% higher with the mechanical pinch gauge. Paired t tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for statistical analyses. The two-tailed p value was <.0001, and the ICC indicated poor to moderate reliability. CONCLUSION. When retesting patients, it is recommended that occupational therapists use the same instrument to measure hand strength because interinstrument reliability may be lacking. OBJECTIVE. This study sought to determine interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the commonly used Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge. METHOD. Twenty men and 20 women were tested for grip strength with the two different dynamometers, and 17 men and 25 women were tested for lateral pinch strength with the two different pinch gauges. RESULTS. Grip strength measurements were approximately 10% higher with the hydraulic dynamometer, and lateral pinch strength measurements were approximately 18% higher with the mechanical pinch gauge. Paired t tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for statistical analyses. The two-tailed p value was <.0001, and the ICC indicated poor to moderate reliability. CONCLUSION. When retesting patients, it is recommended that occupational therapists use the same instrument to measure hand strength because interinstrument reliability may be lacking. Adapted from the source document. King, T. I., II (2013). Brief Report--Interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67,480-483. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2013.007351 OBJECTIVE. This study sought to determine interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the commonly used Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge. METHOD. Twenty men and 20 women were tested for grip strength with the two different dynamometers, and 17 men and 25 women were tested for lateral pinch strength with the two different pinch gauges. RESULTS. Grip strength measurements were approximately 10% higher with the hydraulic dynamometer, and lateral pinch strength measurements were approximately 18% higher with the mechanical pinch gauge. Paired t tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for statistical analyses. The two-tailed p value was <.0001, and the ICC indicated poor to moderate reliability. CONCLUSION. When retesting patients, it is recommended that occupational therapists use the same instrument to measure hand strength because interinstrument reliability may be lacking. OBJECTIVE. This study sought to determine interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the commonly used Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge. METHOD. Twenty men and 20 women were tested for grip strength with the two different dynamometers, and 17 men and 25 women were tested for lateral pinch strength with the two different pinch gauges. RESULTS. Grip strength measurements were approximately 10% higher with the hydraulic dynamometer, and lateral pinch strength measurements were approximately 18% higher with the mechanical pinch gauge. Paired t tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for statistical analyses. The two-tailed p value was <.0001, and the ICC indicated poor to moderate reliability. CONCLUSION. When retesting patients, it is recommended that occupational therapists use the same instrument to measure hand strength because interinstrument reliability may be lacking.OBJECTIVE. This study sought to determine interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the commonly used Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge. METHOD. Twenty men and 20 women were tested for grip strength with the two different dynamometers, and 17 men and 25 women were tested for lateral pinch strength with the two different pinch gauges. RESULTS. Grip strength measurements were approximately 10% higher with the hydraulic dynamometer, and lateral pinch strength measurements were approximately 18% higher with the mechanical pinch gauge. Paired t tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for statistical analyses. The two-tailed p value was <.0001, and the ICC indicated poor to moderate reliability. CONCLUSION. When retesting patients, it is recommended that occupational therapists use the same instrument to measure hand strength because interinstrument reliability may be lacking. |
Audience | Academic |
Author | King, Theodore I. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Theodore I. surname: King fullname: King, Theodore I. organization: Theodore I. King, II, PhD, is Chair, Rehabilitation Science Department, Concordia University Wisconsin, 12800 North Lake Shore Drive, Mequon, WI 53097-2402; Theodore.King@cuw.edu |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23791323$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkktvEzEUhS1URB-wZ4UsIVVsEvwYjzPLEkJbFARCIJYjx3Mn48hjp7ZnkX_Ez8RDCqRVUeWFZes75x7L5xQdOe8AoZeUTAWhxVu18WnKCOVTQiQX9Ak6oVXBJ7KU5RE6IUyySVVU5BidxrghhFUzzp6hY8ZlRTnjJ-jntUsQjIspDD24hL-CNWplrEk77FucOsAfVa8CXljQKXhnNH6_c6r3PWQlVq7BX4zTHb5Uwxrw3PdbFaDBP0zqDuRXuyaowT6gfne-xAu3Ng7GIGv8CXSn8hhlD42fo6etshFe3O5n6PuHxbf51WT5-fJ6frGc6KKiaTLTCiRnslAFoy1RgkErqYJVmU8Nl7RsJXCxkrOWtpoQLSQVVQNE0RXhmvIz9Gbvuw3-ZoCY6t5EDdYqB36INRWCVLOiFOXjaFGxGeVSsMfRnIyVlSA8o6_voRs_BJffnA0JpUTmxP-otbJQG9f6FJQeTesLzsv85-Q3NX2AyquB3ujcpdbk-zuC8wNBB8qmLno7JONdvAu-uk05rHpo6m0w-Zd39Z9mZYDsAR18jAHavwgl9VjeeixvPZa33pc3S8p7Em2SGkfn1Mb-X_gLiDTxTw |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1109_JSEN_2024_3494814 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2024_1340456 crossref_primary_10_2519_jospt_2024_0301 crossref_primary_10_1177_17589983251322537 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apmr_2015_03_018 crossref_primary_10_1111_bcp_14201 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0289052 crossref_primary_10_5014_ajot_2013_009548 crossref_primary_10_5014_ajot_2014_011171 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jht_2015_09_004 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0233271 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12134260 crossref_primary_10_3233_WOR_211368 crossref_primary_10_5014_ajot_2016_019117 crossref_primary_10_1080_10400435_2021_1974980 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_024_08222_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hansur_2022_02_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jht_2015_11_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jht_2015_12_006 crossref_primary_10_3233_TAD_200318 crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10079_1041 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e30899 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jht_2016_02_004 crossref_primary_10_1097_IJG_0000000000000506 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_022_05026_0 |
Cites_doi | 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b296a5 10.1016/S0894-1130(01)80023-5 10.1002/oti.165 10.1016/S0894-1130(03)80022-4 10.1177/175899830501000202 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2013 by the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. COPYRIGHT 2013 American Occupational Therapy Association Copyright American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. Jul/Aug 2013 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2013 by the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. – notice: COPYRIGHT 2013 American Occupational Therapy Association – notice: Copyright American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. Jul/Aug 2013 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 0-V 3V. 4T- 7QJ 7RV 7X7 7XB 88B 88C 88E 88J 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA ALSLI AN0 ASE AZQEC BENPR CCPQU CJNVE DWQXO FPQ FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HEHIP K6X K9. KB0 M0P M0S M0T M1P M2R M2S NAPCQ PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL POGQB PPXIY PQEDU PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRQQA Q9U 7X8 |
DOI | 10.5014/ajot.2013.007351 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】 ProQuest Central (Corporate) Docstoc Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) Nursing & Allied Health Database ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Education Database (Alumni Edition) Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Social Science Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Social Science Premium Collection British Nursing Database British Nursing Index ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College Education Collection ProQuest Central British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present) Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student Sociology Collection (OCUL) British Nursing Index ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) Education Database ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Healthcare Administration Database Medical Database Social Science Database Sociology Database (OCUL) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Education ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Social Sciences ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest One Education ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Central Essentials Sociology & Social Sciences Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Sociology ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Social Science Premium Collection Education Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Sociology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Social Science Journals ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Docstoc ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Social Science Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Pharma Collection Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Sociology Collection ProQuest One Social Sciences ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Education Journals British Nursing Index with Full Text ProQuest Health Management British Nursing Index ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest Education Journals (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA) MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic ProQuest One Education |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Occupational Therapy & Rehabilitation Engineering |
EISSN | 1943-7676 |
EndPage | 483 |
ExternalDocumentID | 3023090171 A336490015 23791323 10_5014_ajot_2013_007351 |
Genre | Journal Article Comparative Study |
GeographicLocations | United States |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States |
GroupedDBID | --- -~X .-4 .GJ 0-6 0-V 04C 0R~ 1KJ 23M 5RE 5RS 6J9 7RV 7X7 88E 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8R4 8R5 AAWTL AAYXX ABIVO ABUWG ABWJO ACGFO ACHQT ACNCT ADBBV ADFRT AERZD AFFNX AFKRA AGHSJ AHMBA AIZAD ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALSLI AN0 AQUVI ARALO ASOEW AZQEC BENPR BKEYQ BMSDO BPHCQ BVXVI C45 CCPQU CITATION CJNVE DWQXO EBS EIHBH EJD EX3 F5P FYUFA GNUQQ H13 HEHIP HF~ HMCUK HZ~ IAO IEA IHR IHW INH INR IPT ITC KOO M0P M0T M1P M2R M2S M5~ NAPCQ NEJ NQS O9- OEN OFXIZ OMB OMI OVD P2P PCD PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB POGQB PPXIY PQEDU PQQKQ PROAC PRQQA PSQYO PUEGO Q2X SJN SKT TEORI TWZ UBE UHB UKHRP UPT VOT WH7 WOW ZT4 .55 07C 53G AAYJJ ACBNA ACUWV AI. C1A CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF J5H N4W NPM OHT PUQ UDY VH1 X7M XOL YCJ YQI YQJ ZB8 ZGI ZXP PMFND 3V. 4T- 7QJ 7XB 8FK ASE FPQ K6X K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI Q9U 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-8cae73274a421f0a52ef71aeb61f0d3716f7e35b78f1fc00c57159de0a1b03c13 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 0272-9490 1943-7676 |
IngestDate | Sun Sep 28 04:36:00 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 12:42:42 EDT 2025 Sun Sep 28 10:18:48 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 12 01:22:07 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 20:36:55 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:47:05 EDT 2025 Thu May 22 21:07:49 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 06:59:45 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 04:09:14 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:53:28 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2013 by the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c491t-8cae73274a421f0a52ef71aeb61f0d3716f7e35b78f1fc00c57159de0a1b03c13 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-General Information-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
PMID | 23791323 |
PQID | 1401107715 |
PQPubID | 47935 |
PageCount | 4 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1550984656 proquest_miscellaneous_1492813752 proquest_miscellaneous_1371269503 proquest_journals_1401107715 gale_infotracmisc_A336490015 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A336490015 gale_healthsolutions_A336490015 pubmed_primary_23791323 crossref_primary_10_5014_ajot_2013_007351 crossref_citationtrail_10_5014_ajot_2013_007351 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2013-07-01 2013 Jul-Aug 20130701 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2013 text: 2013-07-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Bethesda |
PublicationTitle | The American journal of occupational therapy |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Am J Occup Ther |
PublicationYear | 2013 |
Publisher | American Occupational Therapy Association American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: American Occupational Therapy Association – name: American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc |
References | Svens (2021111723225024600_bib10) 2005; 10 MacDermid (2021111723225024600_bib4) 2001; 14 Mathiowetz (2021111723225024600_bib7) 2000; 20 American Society of Hand Therapists. (2021111723225024600_bib1) 1992 Shechtman (2021111723225024600_bib9) 2003; 16 España-Romero (2021111723225024600_bib2) 2010; 24 Flood-Joy (2021111723225024600_bib3) 1987; 7 Mathiowetz (2021111723225024600_bib6) 1985; 66 Mathiowetz (2021111723225024600_bib5) 2002; 9 Portney (2021111723225024600_bib8) 2009 |
References_xml | – volume: 24 start-page: 272 year: 2010 ident: 2021111723225024600_bib2 article-title: Elbow position affects handgrip strength in adolescents: Validity and reliability of Jamar, DynEx, and TKK dynamometers publication-title: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b296a5 – volume-title: Clinical assessment recommendations year: 1992 ident: 2021111723225024600_bib1 – volume: 7 start-page: 235 year: 1987 ident: 2021111723225024600_bib3 article-title: Grip-strength measurement: A comparison of three Jamar dynamometers publication-title: OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health – volume: 14 start-page: 36 year: 2001 ident: 2021111723225024600_bib4 article-title: Inter-instrument reliability of pinch strength scores publication-title: Journal of Hand Therapy doi: 10.1016/S0894-1130(01)80023-5 – volume: 66 start-page: 69 year: 1985 ident: 2021111723225024600_bib6 article-title: Grip and pinch strength: Normative data for adults publication-title: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation – volume: 9 start-page: 201 year: 2002 ident: 2021111723225024600_bib5 article-title: Comparison of Rolyan and Jamar dynamometers for measuring grip strength publication-title: Occupational Therapy International doi: 10.1002/oti.165 – volume-title: Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice year: 2009 ident: 2021111723225024600_bib8 – volume: 16 start-page: 36 year: 2003 ident: 2021111723225024600_bib9 article-title: Reliability and validity of the BTE-Primus grip tool publication-title: Journal of Hand Therapy doi: 10.1016/S0894-1130(03)80022-4 – volume: 10 start-page: 47 year: 2005 ident: 2021111723225024600_bib10 article-title: Intra- and inter-instrument reliability of grip-strength measurements: GripTrack and Jamar hand dynamometers publication-title: Hand Therapy doi: 10.1177/175899830501000202 – volume: 20 start-page: 147 year: 2000 ident: 2021111723225024600_bib7 article-title: Comparison of baseline instruments to the Jamar dynamometer and the B&L engineering pinch gauge publication-title: OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health |
SSID | ssj0029832 |
Score | 2.161615 |
Snippet | OBJECTIVE. This study sought to determine interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the commonly used Jamar... King, T. I., II (2013). Brief Report--Interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the Jamar hydraulic... Objective: This study sought to determine interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the commonly used Jamar... |
SourceID | proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 480 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Comparative analysis Correlation coefficients Data Analysis Dynamometer Engineering Equipment and supplies Equipment Design Female Gauges Grip strength Hand Strength Humans Hydraulics Male Measurement Middle Aged Muscle Strength Dynamometer Muscular Strength Occupational therapists Occupational Therapy Physical Fitness Reliability Reliability (Engineering) Reproducibility of Results Statistical analysis Testing Tests Therapists Within-subjects design Young Adult |
Title | Interinstrument Reliability of the Jamar Electronic Dynamometer and Pinch Gauge Compared With the Jamar Hydraulic Dynamometer and B&L Engineering Mechanical Pinch Gauge |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23791323 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1401107715 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1371269503 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1492813752 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1550984656 |
Volume | 67 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Central customDbUrl: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518 eissn: 1943-7676 dateEnd: 20181130 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0029832 issn: 0272-9490 databaseCode: BENPR dateStart: 20061101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central providerName: ProQuest – providerCode: PRVPQU databaseName: ProQuest Health & Medical Collection customDbUrl: eissn: 1943-7676 dateEnd: 20181130 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0029832 issn: 0272-9490 databaseCode: 7X7 dateStart: 20061101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete providerName: ProQuest |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Nb9QwELWgvcABQfkKlGIkKOIQbWzHSXxCbdmyqmhVVa3YW2Q7Nl3UJqXdPfQf8TOZSbJpUqE9Rn5OLM9kPGOP3xDyURURN8qYkIG_G8bCZqFW1oRKF0zaKDFxnZtzeJRMzuKDqZy2G243bVrl0ibWhrqoLO6RjzAQgFAlZfLr1Z8Qq0bh6WpbQuMhWWfgqqBWp9O7gEtldYEyiLx4qGIVNceUeJI20r8rzKRkyG-aCskGy9J943zP5ayXnv2n5EnrM9KdRsjPyANXbpDHPSbBDfKpzxZMTxuqALpNTwZE3M_J33oHcFbTxuK-IMWU5AZxSytPwR2kB_pSX9NxVx-HfsOq9dUlJs5QXRb0eFbac_pdL345utfmsNOfs_l5r_vktrjWi4v_9N7d_kF7Y6eHDi8fo670X_yCnO2PT_cmYVusIbSxYvMws9qlAmJcHXPmIy258ynTziTwVAgIy3zqhDRp5pm3UWQliFIVLtLMRMIy8ZKslVXpXhMKEaBMvGEFY_AyyTPnhfRpYpSOlGc2IKOlrHLbTiAW1LjIIaJB6eYo3RylmzfSDciXrsdVw-KxAvsexZ8391A7A5DvCJGADoH7FJDPNQJNAHzX6vYmA4weybQGyM0BEn5dO2xeqljemo6b_E7RA_Kha8aemA5XumoBGJhPnigZiRWYWPEMgJKvwEB8qjKkzAvIq0bFu_nhIlVMcPFm9SDfkke8rhCCGcybZA3U170DP21utuqfcYus746Pjk_-Aa2gPPY |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELZKOQAHBOW1UKiRaBGHaP2Ik_iAUOmDbbtbIbRV9xYcx6GLuklpd4X2H3HiNzKTx3a3QnvrMcrYsTyT8Xz2-BtC3umUiUQnicch3vV8aSPPaJt42qRcWRYkfpmb0zsOOif-4UANVsjf5i4MplU2PrF01GlhcY-8jUAAoErI1aeLXx5WjcLT1aaERmUWR276GyDb1ceDXdDvphD7e_2djldXFfCsr_nYi6xxoQQwZnzBM2aUcFnIjUsCeEol4IcsdFIlYZTxzDJmFXxTp44ZnjBpuYR-75C7vmQ-cvWHg2uAp6OyIBogPeFpX7PqWBRP7trmZ4GZmxz5VEOp-MIyeHMxuBHilkvd_iPysI5R6XZlVI_JisvXyIM55sI1sjnPTkz7FTUB3aLfFoi_n5A_5Y7jsKSpxX1IiinQlcSUFhmF8JMempG5pHuzejx0d5qbUTHCRB1q8pR-Heb2jH4xkx-O7tQ58_R0OD6ba96Zppdmcv6f1p-3unRu7LTn8LIz2uZ8x0_Jya2o8RlZzYvcvSAUEKcKsoSnnENnSkQukyoLg0QbpjNuW6Td6Cq29QRiAY_zGBAUajdG7cao3bjSbot8mLW4qFhDlshuoPrj6t7rzOHE21IGYEMQrrXI-1ICXQ5815r65gSMHsm7FiTXFyTBVdjF142JxbWruoqvf6wWeTt7jS0x_S53xQRkYD5FoBWTS2R8LSIQVGKJDOBhHSFFX4s8r0x8Nj9ChppLIV8uH-QGudfp97px9-D46BW5L8rqJJg9vU5WwZTda4gRx8mb8sek5Ptte4J_5RB4KA |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1fb9MwELfGkBA8IBj_CoMZiQ3xEDW24yR-QGisK_uvCW2ib8F2bFa0JmNrhfqN-Ax8Ou6StGsn1Lc9Rjk7lu9yvp_98x0h71QecqOMCRjEu0EkbBpoZU2gdM6kDWMTVdycw6N45zTa68neEvk7uQuDtMqJT6wcdV5a3CNvIxAAqJIw2fYNLeK40_108SvAClJ40jopp1GbyL4b_wb4dvVxtwO6Xue8u32ytRM0FQYCGyk2DFKrXSIAmOmIMx9qyZ1PmHYmhqdcAJbwiRPSJKln3oahlfB9lbtQMxMKywT0e4fcTUQkkE6W9K7Bnkqr4miA-nigIhXWR6R4itfWP0tkcTLMrZoIyeaWxJsLw41wt1r2uo_IwyZepZu1gT0mS65YIQ9mshiukPXZTMX0pE5TQDfo17kk4E_In2r3sV-lrMU9SYp06FpiTEtPIRSle3qgL-n2tDYP7YwLPSgHSNqhusjpcb-wZ_SLHv1wdKvhz9Nv_eHZTPOdcX6pR-f_af1544DOjJ0eOrz4jHY62_FTcnoranxGlouycC8IBfQpY29Yzhh0JnnqvJA-iY3SofLMtkh7oqvMNhOIxTzOM0BTqN0MtZuhdrNauy3yYdrios4gskB2DdWf1Xdgp84n2xQiBhuC0K1F3lcS6H7gu1Y3tyhg9JjIa05ydU4S3Iadfz0xsaxxW1fZ9U_WIm-nr7ElUvEKV45ABuaTx0qGYoFMpHgKgpIvkAFsrFJM19ciz2sTn84PF4ligouXiwe5Ru6BD8gOdo_2X5H7vCpUgkTqVbIMluxeQ7g4NG-q_5KS77ftCP4BpU58Yw |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interinstrument+reliability+of+the+Jamar+electronic+dynamometer+and+pinch+gauge+compared+with+the+Jamar+hydraulic+dynamometer+and+B%26L+Engineering+mechanical+pinch+gauge&rft.jtitle=The+American+journal+of+occupational+therapy&rft.au=King%2C+Theodore+I&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.issn=1943-7676&rft.eissn=1943-7676&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=480&rft_id=info:doi/10.5014%2Fajot.2013.007351&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0272-9490&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0272-9490&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0272-9490&client=summon |