Interinstrument Reliability of the Jamar Electronic Dynamometer and Pinch Gauge Compared With the Jamar Hydraulic Dynamometer and B&L Engineering Mechanical Pinch Gauge

OBJECTIVE. This study sought to determine interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the commonly used Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge. METHOD. Twenty men and 20 women were tested for grip strength with the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe American journal of occupational therapy Vol. 67; no. 4; pp. 480 - 483
Main Author King, Theodore I.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States American Occupational Therapy Association 01.07.2013
American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0272-9490
1943-7676
1943-7676
DOI10.5014/ajot.2013.007351

Cover

Abstract OBJECTIVE. This study sought to determine interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the commonly used Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge. METHOD. Twenty men and 20 women were tested for grip strength with the two different dynamometers, and 17 men and 25 women were tested for lateral pinch strength with the two different pinch gauges. RESULTS. Grip strength measurements were approximately 10% higher with the hydraulic dynamometer, and lateral pinch strength measurements were approximately 18% higher with the mechanical pinch gauge. Paired t tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for statistical analyses. The two-tailed p value was <.0001, and the ICC indicated poor to moderate reliability. CONCLUSION. When retesting patients, it is recommended that occupational therapists use the same instrument to measure hand strength because interinstrument reliability may be lacking.
AbstractList Objective: This study sought to determine interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the commonly used Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge. Method: Twenty men and 20 women were tested for grip strength with the two different dynamometers, and 17 men and 25 women were tested for lateral pinch strength with the two different pinch gauges. Results: Grip strength measurements were approximately 10% higher with the hydraulic dynamometer, and lateral pinch strength measurements were approximately 18% higher with the mechanical pinch gauge. Paired tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for statistical analyses. The two-tailed p value was <.0001, and the ICC indicated poor to moderate reliability. Conclusion: When retesting patients, it is recommended that occupational therapists use the same instrument to measure hand strength because interinstrument reliability may be lacking.
OBJECTIVE. This study sought to determine interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the commonly used Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge. METHOD. Twenty men and 20 women were tested for grip strength with the two different dynamometers, and 17 men and 25 women were tested for lateral pinch strength with the two different pinch gauges. RESULTS. Grip strength measurements were approximately 10% higher with the hydraulic dynamometer, and lateral pinch strength measurements were approximately 18% higher with the mechanical pinch gauge. Paired ttests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for statistical analyses. The two-tailed p value was <.0001, and the ICC indicated poor to moderate reliability. CONCLUSION. When retesting patients, it is recommended that occupational therapists use the same instrument to measure hand strength because interinstrument reliability may be lacking. King, T. I., II (2013). Brief Report--Interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67,480-483.
OBJECTIVE. This study sought to determine interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the commonly used Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge. METHOD. Twenty men and 20 women were tested for grip strength with the two different dynamometers, and 17 men and 25 women were tested for lateral pinch strength with the two different pinch gauges. RESULTS. Grip strength measurements were approximately 10% higher with the hydraulic dynamometer, and lateral pinch strength measurements were approximately 18% higher with the mechanical pinch gauge. Paired t tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for statistical analyses. The two-tailed p value was <.0001, and the ICC indicated poor to moderate reliability. CONCLUSION. When retesting patients, it is recommended that occupational therapists use the same instrument to measure hand strength because interinstrument reliability may be lacking.
OBJECTIVE. This study sought to determine interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the commonly used Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge. METHOD. Twenty men and 20 women were tested for grip strength with the two different dynamometers, and 17 men and 25 women were tested for lateral pinch strength with the two different pinch gauges. RESULTS. Grip strength measurements were approximately 10% higher with the hydraulic dynamometer, and lateral pinch strength measurements were approximately 18% higher with the mechanical pinch gauge. Paired t tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for statistical analyses. The two-tailed p value was <.0001, and the ICC indicated poor to moderate reliability. CONCLUSION. When retesting patients, it is recommended that occupational therapists use the same instrument to measure hand strength because interinstrument reliability may be lacking. Adapted from the source document.
King, T. I., II (2013). Brief Report--Interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67,480-483. http://dx.doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2013.007351
OBJECTIVE. This study sought to determine interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the commonly used Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge. METHOD. Twenty men and 20 women were tested for grip strength with the two different dynamometers, and 17 men and 25 women were tested for lateral pinch strength with the two different pinch gauges. RESULTS. Grip strength measurements were approximately 10% higher with the hydraulic dynamometer, and lateral pinch strength measurements were approximately 18% higher with the mechanical pinch gauge. Paired t tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for statistical analyses. The two-tailed p value was <.0001, and the ICC indicated poor to moderate reliability. CONCLUSION. When retesting patients, it is recommended that occupational therapists use the same instrument to measure hand strength because interinstrument reliability may be lacking.
OBJECTIVE. This study sought to determine interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the commonly used Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge. METHOD. Twenty men and 20 women were tested for grip strength with the two different dynamometers, and 17 men and 25 women were tested for lateral pinch strength with the two different pinch gauges. RESULTS. Grip strength measurements were approximately 10% higher with the hydraulic dynamometer, and lateral pinch strength measurements were approximately 18% higher with the mechanical pinch gauge. Paired t tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for statistical analyses. The two-tailed p value was <.0001, and the ICC indicated poor to moderate reliability. CONCLUSION. When retesting patients, it is recommended that occupational therapists use the same instrument to measure hand strength because interinstrument reliability may be lacking.OBJECTIVE. This study sought to determine interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the commonly used Jamar hydraulic dynamometer and B&L Engineering mechanical pinch gauge. METHOD. Twenty men and 20 women were tested for grip strength with the two different dynamometers, and 17 men and 25 women were tested for lateral pinch strength with the two different pinch gauges. RESULTS. Grip strength measurements were approximately 10% higher with the hydraulic dynamometer, and lateral pinch strength measurements were approximately 18% higher with the mechanical pinch gauge. Paired t tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for statistical analyses. The two-tailed p value was <.0001, and the ICC indicated poor to moderate reliability. CONCLUSION. When retesting patients, it is recommended that occupational therapists use the same instrument to measure hand strength because interinstrument reliability may be lacking.
Audience Academic
Author King, Theodore I.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Theodore I.
  surname: King
  fullname: King, Theodore I.
  organization: Theodore I. King, II, PhD, is Chair, Rehabilitation Science Department, Concordia University Wisconsin, 12800 North Lake Shore Drive, Mequon, WI 53097-2402; Theodore.King@cuw.edu
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23791323$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkktvEzEUhS1URB-wZ4UsIVVsEvwYjzPLEkJbFARCIJYjx3Mn48hjp7ZnkX_Ez8RDCqRVUeWFZes75x7L5xQdOe8AoZeUTAWhxVu18WnKCOVTQiQX9Ak6oVXBJ7KU5RE6IUyySVVU5BidxrghhFUzzp6hY8ZlRTnjJ-jntUsQjIspDD24hL-CNWplrEk77FucOsAfVa8CXljQKXhnNH6_c6r3PWQlVq7BX4zTHb5Uwxrw3PdbFaDBP0zqDuRXuyaowT6gfne-xAu3Ng7GIGv8CXSn8hhlD42fo6etshFe3O5n6PuHxbf51WT5-fJ6frGc6KKiaTLTCiRnslAFoy1RgkErqYJVmU8Nl7RsJXCxkrOWtpoQLSQVVQNE0RXhmvIz9Gbvuw3-ZoCY6t5EDdYqB36INRWCVLOiFOXjaFGxGeVSsMfRnIyVlSA8o6_voRs_BJffnA0JpUTmxP-otbJQG9f6FJQeTesLzsv85-Q3NX2AyquB3ujcpdbk-zuC8wNBB8qmLno7JONdvAu-uk05rHpo6m0w-Zd39Z9mZYDsAR18jAHavwgl9VjeeixvPZa33pc3S8p7Em2SGkfn1Mb-X_gLiDTxTw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1109_JSEN_2024_3494814
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2024_1340456
crossref_primary_10_2519_jospt_2024_0301
crossref_primary_10_1177_17589983251322537
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apmr_2015_03_018
crossref_primary_10_1111_bcp_14201
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0289052
crossref_primary_10_5014_ajot_2013_009548
crossref_primary_10_5014_ajot_2014_011171
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jht_2015_09_004
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0233271
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12134260
crossref_primary_10_3233_WOR_211368
crossref_primary_10_5014_ajot_2016_019117
crossref_primary_10_1080_10400435_2021_1974980
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_024_08222_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_hansur_2022_02_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jht_2015_11_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jht_2015_12_006
crossref_primary_10_3233_TAD_200318
crossref_primary_10_5005_jp_journals_10079_1041
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e30899
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jht_2016_02_004
crossref_primary_10_1097_IJG_0000000000000506
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12891_022_05026_0
Cites_doi 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b296a5
10.1016/S0894-1130(01)80023-5
10.1002/oti.165
10.1016/S0894-1130(03)80022-4
10.1177/175899830501000202
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2013 by the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc.
COPYRIGHT 2013 American Occupational Therapy Association
Copyright American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. Jul/Aug 2013
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2013 by the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc.
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2013 American Occupational Therapy Association
– notice: Copyright American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. Jul/Aug 2013
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
0-V
3V.
4T-
7QJ
7RV
7X7
7XB
88B
88C
88E
88J
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
ALSLI
AN0
ASE
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
CJNVE
DWQXO
FPQ
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
HEHIP
K6X
K9.
KB0
M0P
M0S
M0T
M1P
M2R
M2S
NAPCQ
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
POGQB
PPXIY
PQEDU
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRQQA
Q9U
7X8
DOI 10.5014/ajot.2013.007351
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Docstoc
Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
Nursing & Allied Health Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Education Database (Alumni Edition)
Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Social Science Premium Collection
British Nursing Database
British Nursing Index
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
Education Collection
ProQuest Central
British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
Sociology Collection (OCUL)
British Nursing Index
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
Education Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Healthcare Administration Database
Medical Database
Social Science Database
Sociology Database (OCUL)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Education
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Social Sciences
ProQuest Central Basic
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest One Education
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Central Essentials
Sociology & Social Sciences Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Sociology
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
Social Science Premium Collection
Education Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Sociology Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Social Science Journals
ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Docstoc
ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Social Science Journals (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Sociology Collection
ProQuest One Social Sciences
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest Education Journals
British Nursing Index with Full Text
ProQuest Health Management
British Nursing Index
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest Education Journals (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

CrossRef
Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA)


MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
ProQuest One Education
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Occupational Therapy & Rehabilitation
Engineering
EISSN 1943-7676
EndPage 483
ExternalDocumentID 3023090171
A336490015
23791323
10_5014_ajot_2013_007351
Genre Journal Article
Comparative Study
GeographicLocations United States
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
.-4
.GJ
0-6
0-V
04C
0R~
1KJ
23M
5RE
5RS
6J9
7RV
7X7
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8R4
8R5
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABIVO
ABUWG
ABWJO
ACGFO
ACHQT
ACNCT
ADBBV
ADFRT
AERZD
AFFNX
AFKRA
AGHSJ
AHMBA
AIZAD
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALSLI
AN0
AQUVI
ARALO
ASOEW
AZQEC
BENPR
BKEYQ
BMSDO
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C45
CCPQU
CITATION
CJNVE
DWQXO
EBS
EIHBH
EJD
EX3
F5P
FYUFA
GNUQQ
H13
HEHIP
HF~
HMCUK
HZ~
IAO
IEA
IHR
IHW
INH
INR
IPT
ITC
KOO
M0P
M0T
M1P
M2R
M2S
M5~
NAPCQ
NEJ
NQS
O9-
OEN
OFXIZ
OMB
OMI
OVD
P2P
PCD
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
POGQB
PPXIY
PQEDU
PQQKQ
PROAC
PRQQA
PSQYO
PUEGO
Q2X
SJN
SKT
TEORI
TWZ
UBE
UHB
UKHRP
UPT
VOT
WH7
WOW
ZT4
.55
07C
53G
AAYJJ
ACBNA
ACUWV
AI.
C1A
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
J5H
N4W
NPM
OHT
PUQ
UDY
VH1
X7M
XOL
YCJ
YQI
YQJ
ZB8
ZGI
ZXP
PMFND
3V.
4T-
7QJ
7XB
8FK
ASE
FPQ
K6X
K9.
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
Q9U
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-8cae73274a421f0a52ef71aeb61f0d3716f7e35b78f1fc00c57159de0a1b03c13
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 0272-9490
1943-7676
IngestDate Sun Sep 28 04:36:00 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 12:42:42 EDT 2025
Sun Sep 28 10:18:48 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 12 01:22:07 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 20:36:55 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:47:05 EDT 2025
Thu May 22 21:07:49 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 06:59:45 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 04:09:14 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:53:28 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Language English
License Copyright © 2013 by the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c491t-8cae73274a421f0a52ef71aeb61f0d3716f7e35b78f1fc00c57159de0a1b03c13
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-General Information-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
PMID 23791323
PQID 1401107715
PQPubID 47935
PageCount 4
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1550984656
proquest_miscellaneous_1492813752
proquest_miscellaneous_1371269503
proquest_journals_1401107715
gale_infotracmisc_A336490015
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A336490015
gale_healthsolutions_A336490015
pubmed_primary_23791323
crossref_primary_10_5014_ajot_2013_007351
crossref_citationtrail_10_5014_ajot_2013_007351
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2013-07-01
2013 Jul-Aug
20130701
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2013
  text: 2013-07-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
– name: Bethesda
PublicationTitle The American journal of occupational therapy
PublicationTitleAlternate Am J Occup Ther
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher American Occupational Therapy Association
American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: American Occupational Therapy Association
– name: American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc
References Svens (2021111723225024600_bib10) 2005; 10
MacDermid (2021111723225024600_bib4) 2001; 14
Mathiowetz (2021111723225024600_bib7) 2000; 20
American Society of Hand Therapists. (2021111723225024600_bib1) 1992
Shechtman (2021111723225024600_bib9) 2003; 16
España-Romero (2021111723225024600_bib2) 2010; 24
Flood-Joy (2021111723225024600_bib3) 1987; 7
Mathiowetz (2021111723225024600_bib6) 1985; 66
Mathiowetz (2021111723225024600_bib5) 2002; 9
Portney (2021111723225024600_bib8) 2009
References_xml – volume: 24
  start-page: 272
  year: 2010
  ident: 2021111723225024600_bib2
  article-title: Elbow position affects handgrip strength in adolescents: Validity and reliability of Jamar, DynEx, and TKK dynamometers
  publication-title: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
  doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b296a5
– volume-title: Clinical assessment recommendations
  year: 1992
  ident: 2021111723225024600_bib1
– volume: 7
  start-page: 235
  year: 1987
  ident: 2021111723225024600_bib3
  article-title: Grip-strength measurement: A comparison of three Jamar dynamometers
  publication-title: OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health
– volume: 14
  start-page: 36
  year: 2001
  ident: 2021111723225024600_bib4
  article-title: Inter-instrument reliability of pinch strength scores
  publication-title: Journal of Hand Therapy
  doi: 10.1016/S0894-1130(01)80023-5
– volume: 66
  start-page: 69
  year: 1985
  ident: 2021111723225024600_bib6
  article-title: Grip and pinch strength: Normative data for adults
  publication-title: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
– volume: 9
  start-page: 201
  year: 2002
  ident: 2021111723225024600_bib5
  article-title: Comparison of Rolyan and Jamar dynamometers for measuring grip strength
  publication-title: Occupational Therapy International
  doi: 10.1002/oti.165
– volume-title: Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice
  year: 2009
  ident: 2021111723225024600_bib8
– volume: 16
  start-page: 36
  year: 2003
  ident: 2021111723225024600_bib9
  article-title: Reliability and validity of the BTE-Primus grip tool
  publication-title: Journal of Hand Therapy
  doi: 10.1016/S0894-1130(03)80022-4
– volume: 10
  start-page: 47
  year: 2005
  ident: 2021111723225024600_bib10
  article-title: Intra- and inter-instrument reliability of grip-strength measurements: GripTrack and Jamar hand dynamometers
  publication-title: Hand Therapy
  doi: 10.1177/175899830501000202
– volume: 20
  start-page: 147
  year: 2000
  ident: 2021111723225024600_bib7
  article-title: Comparison of baseline instruments to the Jamar dynamometer and the B&L engineering pinch gauge
  publication-title: OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health
SSID ssj0029832
Score 2.161615
Snippet OBJECTIVE. This study sought to determine interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the commonly used Jamar...
King, T. I., II (2013). Brief Report--Interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the Jamar hydraulic...
Objective: This study sought to determine interinstrument reliability of the Jamar electronic dynamometer and pinch gauge compared with the commonly used Jamar...
SourceID proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 480
SubjectTerms Adult
Comparative analysis
Correlation coefficients
Data Analysis
Dynamometer
Engineering
Equipment and supplies
Equipment Design
Female
Gauges
Grip strength
Hand Strength
Humans
Hydraulics
Male
Measurement
Middle Aged
Muscle Strength Dynamometer
Muscular Strength
Occupational therapists
Occupational Therapy
Physical Fitness
Reliability
Reliability (Engineering)
Reproducibility of Results
Statistical analysis
Testing
Tests
Therapists
Within-subjects design
Young Adult
Title Interinstrument Reliability of the Jamar Electronic Dynamometer and Pinch Gauge Compared With the Jamar Hydraulic Dynamometer and B&L Engineering Mechanical Pinch Gauge
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23791323
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1401107715
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1371269503
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1492813752
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1550984656
Volume 67
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Central
  customDbUrl: http://www.proquest.com/pqcentral?accountid=15518
  eissn: 1943-7676
  dateEnd: 20181130
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0029832
  issn: 0272-9490
  databaseCode: BENPR
  dateStart: 20061101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.proquest.com/central
  providerName: ProQuest
– providerCode: PRVPQU
  databaseName: ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1943-7676
  dateEnd: 20181130
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0029832
  issn: 0272-9490
  databaseCode: 7X7
  dateStart: 20061101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://search.proquest.com/healthcomplete
  providerName: ProQuest
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Nb9QwELWgvcABQfkKlGIkKOIQbWzHSXxCbdmyqmhVVa3YW2Q7Nl3UJqXdPfQf8TOZSbJpUqE9Rn5OLM9kPGOP3xDyURURN8qYkIG_G8bCZqFW1oRKF0zaKDFxnZtzeJRMzuKDqZy2G243bVrl0ibWhrqoLO6RjzAQgFAlZfLr1Z8Qq0bh6WpbQuMhWWfgqqBWp9O7gEtldYEyiLx4qGIVNceUeJI20r8rzKRkyG-aCskGy9J943zP5ayXnv2n5EnrM9KdRsjPyANXbpDHPSbBDfKpzxZMTxuqALpNTwZE3M_J33oHcFbTxuK-IMWU5AZxSytPwR2kB_pSX9NxVx-HfsOq9dUlJs5QXRb0eFbac_pdL345utfmsNOfs_l5r_vktrjWi4v_9N7d_kF7Y6eHDi8fo670X_yCnO2PT_cmYVusIbSxYvMws9qlAmJcHXPmIy258ynTziTwVAgIy3zqhDRp5pm3UWQliFIVLtLMRMIy8ZKslVXpXhMKEaBMvGEFY_AyyTPnhfRpYpSOlGc2IKOlrHLbTiAW1LjIIaJB6eYo3RylmzfSDciXrsdVw-KxAvsexZ8391A7A5DvCJGADoH7FJDPNQJNAHzX6vYmA4weybQGyM0BEn5dO2xeqljemo6b_E7RA_Kha8aemA5XumoBGJhPnigZiRWYWPEMgJKvwEB8qjKkzAvIq0bFu_nhIlVMcPFm9SDfkke8rhCCGcybZA3U170DP21utuqfcYus746Pjk_-Aa2gPPY
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELZKOQAHBOW1UKiRaBGHaP2Ik_iAUOmDbbtbIbRV9xYcx6GLuklpd4X2H3HiNzKTx3a3QnvrMcrYsTyT8Xz2-BtC3umUiUQnicch3vV8aSPPaJt42qRcWRYkfpmb0zsOOif-4UANVsjf5i4MplU2PrF01GlhcY-8jUAAoErI1aeLXx5WjcLT1aaERmUWR276GyDb1ceDXdDvphD7e_2djldXFfCsr_nYi6xxoQQwZnzBM2aUcFnIjUsCeEol4IcsdFIlYZTxzDJmFXxTp44ZnjBpuYR-75C7vmQ-cvWHg2uAp6OyIBogPeFpX7PqWBRP7trmZ4GZmxz5VEOp-MIyeHMxuBHilkvd_iPysI5R6XZlVI_JisvXyIM55sI1sjnPTkz7FTUB3aLfFoi_n5A_5Y7jsKSpxX1IiinQlcSUFhmF8JMempG5pHuzejx0d5qbUTHCRB1q8pR-Heb2jH4xkx-O7tQ58_R0OD6ba96Zppdmcv6f1p-3unRu7LTn8LIz2uZ8x0_Jya2o8RlZzYvcvSAUEKcKsoSnnENnSkQukyoLg0QbpjNuW6Td6Cq29QRiAY_zGBAUajdG7cao3bjSbot8mLW4qFhDlshuoPrj6t7rzOHE21IGYEMQrrXI-1ICXQ5815r65gSMHsm7FiTXFyTBVdjF142JxbWruoqvf6wWeTt7jS0x_S53xQRkYD5FoBWTS2R8LSIQVGKJDOBhHSFFX4s8r0x8Nj9ChppLIV8uH-QGudfp97px9-D46BW5L8rqJJg9vU5WwZTda4gRx8mb8sek5Ptte4J_5RB4KA
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1fb9MwELfGkBA8IBj_CoMZiQ3xEDW24yR-QGisK_uvCW2ib8F2bFa0JmNrhfqN-Ax8Ou6StGsn1Lc9Rjk7lu9yvp_98x0h71QecqOMCRjEu0EkbBpoZU2gdM6kDWMTVdycw6N45zTa68neEvk7uQuDtMqJT6wcdV5a3CNvIxAAqJIw2fYNLeK40_108SvAClJ40jopp1GbyL4b_wb4dvVxtwO6Xue8u32ytRM0FQYCGyk2DFKrXSIAmOmIMx9qyZ1PmHYmhqdcAJbwiRPSJKln3oahlfB9lbtQMxMKywT0e4fcTUQkkE6W9K7Bnkqr4miA-nigIhXWR6R4itfWP0tkcTLMrZoIyeaWxJsLw41wt1r2uo_IwyZepZu1gT0mS65YIQ9mshiukPXZTMX0pE5TQDfo17kk4E_In2r3sV-lrMU9SYp06FpiTEtPIRSle3qgL-n2tDYP7YwLPSgHSNqhusjpcb-wZ_SLHv1wdKvhz9Nv_eHZTPOdcX6pR-f_af1544DOjJ0eOrz4jHY62_FTcnoranxGlouycC8IBfQpY29Yzhh0JnnqvJA-iY3SofLMtkh7oqvMNhOIxTzOM0BTqN0MtZuhdrNauy3yYdrios4gskB2DdWf1Xdgp84n2xQiBhuC0K1F3lcS6H7gu1Y3tyhg9JjIa05ydU4S3Iadfz0xsaxxW1fZ9U_WIm-nr7ElUvEKV45ABuaTx0qGYoFMpHgKgpIvkAFsrFJM19ciz2sTn84PF4ligouXiwe5Ru6BD8gOdo_2X5H7vCpUgkTqVbIMluxeQ7g4NG-q_5KS77ftCP4BpU58Yw
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interinstrument+reliability+of+the+Jamar+electronic+dynamometer+and+pinch+gauge+compared+with+the+Jamar+hydraulic+dynamometer+and+B%26L+Engineering+mechanical+pinch+gauge&rft.jtitle=The+American+journal+of+occupational+therapy&rft.au=King%2C+Theodore+I&rft.date=2013-07-01&rft.issn=1943-7676&rft.eissn=1943-7676&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=480&rft_id=info:doi/10.5014%2Fajot.2013.007351&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0272-9490&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0272-9490&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0272-9490&client=summon