Comparison of ELISA for Fusarium, Visual Screening, and Deoxynivalenol Analysis of Fusarium Head Blight for Barley Field Nurseries

Breeding for resistance to Fusarium head blight {FHB; caused by Fusarium graminearum Schwabe [teleomorph Gibberella zeae (Schwein) Petch]} is complicated because there is no accurate method for quantifying the disease organism. Most breeders rely on visual scoring for FHB and deoxynivalenol (DON) an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCrop science Vol. 48; no. 4; pp. 1389 - 1398
Main Authors Hill, N.S, Neate, S.M, Cooper, B, Horsley, R, Schwarz, P, Dahleen, L.S, Smith, K.P, O'Donnell, K, Reeves, J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Madison Crop Science Society of America 01.07.2008
American Society of Agronomy
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0011-183X
1435-0653
DOI10.2135/cropsci2007.05.0266

Cover

More Information
Summary:Breeding for resistance to Fusarium head blight {FHB; caused by Fusarium graminearum Schwabe [teleomorph Gibberella zeae (Schwein) Petch]} is complicated because there is no accurate method for quantifying the disease organism. Most breeders rely on visual scoring for FHB and deoxynivalenol (DON) analysis to assess disease severity, but both DON and visual scoring are subject to error. The objective of this study was to compare a Fusarium-specific quantifiable enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to DON and visual assessment of FHB. A doubled-haploid mapping population was grown in two environments and breeding lines in the North American Barley Scab Evaluation Nursery (NABSEN) were grown at four locations. Both experiments used a randomized complete block design and were analyzed for Fusarium by ELISA, DON, and visually scored for FHB. ELISA values for the doubled-haploid lines were consistent over years, and lines that were low in ELISA were also low in DON. Broad sense heritability was greater for ELISA (0.48) than DON (0.19) or visual scores of disease (0.29) in the NABSEN study. Numbers of locations and replications necessary to screen for disease were calculated for ELISA, DON, and FHB. ELISA required one-third to one-fourth as many replications and locations as did DON or FHB. Temperature and osmotic potential had little effect on mycelial antigen used for ELISA in vitro, but both affected DON. ELISA is a practical alternative to combined visual scores and DON analysis for breeders interested in improving FHB resistance.
Bibliography:http://hdl.handle.net/10113/18250
http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.05.0266
All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher.
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0011-183X
1435-0653
DOI:10.2135/cropsci2007.05.0266