Influences of maximum principal stress direction and cross-section shape on tunnel stability

• Published in: Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering Vol. 17; no. 4; pp. 2159 - 2180
• Main Authors: Si, Xuefeng, Zhang, Zilong, Li, Xibing, Yi, Guansheng, Luo, Yong, Tan, Lihai, Han, Kaifeng
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.04.2025; Elsevier
• Subjects: Cross-section shape; Failure characteristics; Fractal dimension; Maximum principal stress direction; Theoretical analysis; True-triaxial experiment; Theoretical analysis; True-triaxial experiment; Fractal dimension; Cross-section shape; Maximum principal stress direction; Failure characteristics
• ISSN: 1674-7755
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2024.10.003

To investigate the effects of the maximum principal stress direction (θ) and cross-section shape on the failure characteristics of sandstone, true-triaxial compression experiments were conducted using cubic samples with rectangular, circular, and D-shaped holes. As θ increases from 0° to 60° in the rectangular hole, the left failure location shifts from the left corner to the left sidewall, the left corner, and then the floor, while the right failure location shifts from the right corner to the right sidewall, right roof corner, and then the roof. Furthermore, the initial failure vertical stress first decreases and then increases. In comparison, the failure severity in the rectangular hole decreases for various θ values as 30° > 45° > 60° > 0°. With increasing θ, the fractal dimension (D) of rock slices first increases and then decreases. For the rectangular and D-shaped holes, when θ = 0°, 30°, and 90°, D for the rectangular hole is less than that of the D-shaped hole. When θ = 45° and 60°, D for the rectangular hole is greater than that of the D-shaped hole. Theoretical analysis indicates that the stress concentration at the rectangular and D-shaped corners is greater than the other areas. The failure location rotates with the rotation of θ, and the failure occurs on the side with a high concentration of compressive stress, while the side with the tensile and compressive stresses remains relatively stable. Therefore, the fundamental reason for the rotation of failure location is the rotation of stress concentration, and the external influencing factor is the rotation of θ.