Fully automated segmentation of oncological PET volumes using a combined multiscale and statistical model
The widespread application of positron emission tomography (PET) in clinical oncology has driven this imaging technology into a number of new research and clinical arenas. Increasing numbers of patient scans have led to an urgent need for efficient data handling and the development of new image anal...
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Published in | Medical physics (Lancaster) Vol. 34; no. 2; pp. 722 - 736 | 
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , | 
| Format | Journal Article | 
| Language | English | 
| Published | 
        United States
          American Association of Physicists in Medicine
    
        01.02.2007
     | 
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text | 
| ISSN | 0094-2405 2473-4209  | 
| DOI | 10.1118/1.2432404 | 
Cover
| Abstract | The widespread application of positron emission tomography (PET) in clinical oncology has driven this imaging technology into a number of new research and clinical arenas. Increasing numbers of patient scans have led to an urgent need for efficient data handling and the development of new image analysis techniques to aid clinicians in the diagnosis of disease and planning of treatment. Automatic quantitative assessment of metabolic PET data is attractive and will certainly revolutionize the practice of functional imaging since it can lower variability across institutions and may enhance the consistency of image interpretation independent of reader experience. In this paper, a novel automated system for the segmentation of oncological PET data aiming at providing an accurate quantitative analysis tool is proposed. The initial step involves expectation maximization (EM)-based mixture modeling using a
k
-means clustering procedure, which varies voxel order for initialization. A multiscale Markov model is then used to refine this segmentation by modeling spatial correlations between neighboring image voxels. An experimental study using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom was conducted for quantitative evaluation of the performance of the proposed segmentation algorithm. The comparison of actual tumor volumes to the volumes calculated using different segmentation methodologies including standard
k
-means, spatial domain Markov Random Field Model (MRFM), and the new multiscale MRFM proposed in this paper showed that the latter dramatically reduces the relative error to less than 8% for small lesions (
7
mm
radii) and less than 3.5% for larger lesions (
9
mm
radii). The analysis of the resulting segmentations of clinical oncologic PET data seems to confirm that this methodology shows promise and can successfully segment patient lesions. For problematic images, this technique enables the identification of tumors situated very close to nearby high normal physiologic uptake. The use of this technique to estimate tumor volumes for assessment of response to therapy and to delineate treatment volumes for the purpose of combined PET/CT-based radiation therapy treatment planning is also discussed. | 
    
|---|---|
| AbstractList | The widespread application of positron emission tomography (PET) in clinical oncology has driven this imaging technology into a number of new research and clinical arenas. Increasing numbers of patient scans have led to an urgent need for efficient data handling and the development of new image analysis techniques to aid clinicians in the diagnosis of disease and planning of treatment. Automatic quantitative assessment of metabolic PET data is attractive and will certainly revolutionize the practice of functional imaging since it can lower variability across institutions and may enhance the consistency of image interpretation independent of reader experience. In this paper, a novel automated system for the segmentation of oncological PET data aiming at providing an accurate quantitative analysis tool is proposed. The initial step involves expectation maximization (EM)‐based mixture modeling using a
‐means clustering procedure, which varies voxel order for initialization. A multiscale Markov model is then used to refine this segmentation by modeling spatial correlations between neighboring image voxels. An experimental study using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom was conducted for quantitative evaluation of the performance of the proposed segmentation algorithm. The comparison of actual tumor volumes to the volumes calculated using different segmentation methodologies including standard
‐means, spatial domain Markov Random Field Model (MRFM), and the new multiscale MRFM proposed in this paper showed that the latter dramatically reduces the relative error to less than 8% for small lesions (
radii) and less than 3.5% for larger lesions (
radii). The analysis of the resulting segmentations of clinical oncologic PET data seems to confirm that this methodology shows promise and can successfully segment patient lesions. For problematic images, this technique enables the identification of tumors situated very close to nearby high normal physiologic uptake. The use of this technique to estimate tumor volumes for assessment of response to therapy and to delineate treatment volumes for the purpose of combined PET/CT‐based radiation therapy treatment planning is also discussed. The widespread application of positron emission tomography (PET) in clinical oncology has driven this imaging technology into a number of new research and clinical arenas. Increasing numbers of patient scans have led to an urgent need for efficient data handling and the development of new image analysis techniques to aid clinicians in the diagnosis of disease and planning of treatment. Automatic quantitative assessment of metabolic PET data is attractive and will certainly revolutionize the practice of functional imaging since it can lower variability across institutions and may enhance the consistency of image interpretation independent of reader experience. In this paper, a novel automated system for the segmentation of oncological PET data aiming at providing an accurate quantitative analysis tool is proposed. The initial step involves expectation maximization (EM)-based mixture modeling using a k-means clustering procedure, which varies voxel order for initialization. A multiscale Markov model is then used to refine this segmentation by modeling spatial correlations between neighboring image voxels. An experimental study using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom was conducted for quantitative evaluation of the performance of the proposed segmentation algorithm. The comparison of actual tumor volumes to the volumes calculated using different segmentation methodologies including standard k-means, spatial domain Markov Random Field Model (MRFM), and the new multiscale MRFM proposed in this paper showed that the latter dramatically reduces the relative error to less than 8% for small lesions (7 mm radii) and less than 3.5% for larger lesions (9 mm radii). The analysis of the resulting segmentations of clinical oncologic PET data seems to confirm that this methodology shows promise and can successfully segment patient lesions. For problematic images, this technique enables the identification of tumors situated very close to nearby high normal physiologic uptake. The use of this technique to estimate tumor volumes for assessment of response to therapy and to delineate treatment volumes for the purpose of combined PET/CT-based radiation therapy treatment planning is also discussed.The widespread application of positron emission tomography (PET) in clinical oncology has driven this imaging technology into a number of new research and clinical arenas. Increasing numbers of patient scans have led to an urgent need for efficient data handling and the development of new image analysis techniques to aid clinicians in the diagnosis of disease and planning of treatment. Automatic quantitative assessment of metabolic PET data is attractive and will certainly revolutionize the practice of functional imaging since it can lower variability across institutions and may enhance the consistency of image interpretation independent of reader experience. In this paper, a novel automated system for the segmentation of oncological PET data aiming at providing an accurate quantitative analysis tool is proposed. The initial step involves expectation maximization (EM)-based mixture modeling using a k-means clustering procedure, which varies voxel order for initialization. A multiscale Markov model is then used to refine this segmentation by modeling spatial correlations between neighboring image voxels. An experimental study using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom was conducted for quantitative evaluation of the performance of the proposed segmentation algorithm. The comparison of actual tumor volumes to the volumes calculated using different segmentation methodologies including standard k-means, spatial domain Markov Random Field Model (MRFM), and the new multiscale MRFM proposed in this paper showed that the latter dramatically reduces the relative error to less than 8% for small lesions (7 mm radii) and less than 3.5% for larger lesions (9 mm radii). The analysis of the resulting segmentations of clinical oncologic PET data seems to confirm that this methodology shows promise and can successfully segment patient lesions. For problematic images, this technique enables the identification of tumors situated very close to nearby high normal physiologic uptake. The use of this technique to estimate tumor volumes for assessment of response to therapy and to delineate treatment volumes for the purpose of combined PET/CT-based radiation therapy treatment planning is also discussed. The widespread application of positron emission tomography (PET) in clinical oncology has driven this imaging technology into a number of new research and clinical arenas. Increasing numbers of patient scans have led to an urgent need for efficient data handling and the development of new image analysis techniques to aid clinicians in the diagnosis of disease and planning of treatment. Automatic quantitative assessment of metabolic PET data is attractive and will certainly revolutionize the practice of functional imaging since it can lower variability across institutions and may enhance the consistency of image interpretation independent of reader experience. In this paper, a novel automated system for the segmentation of oncological PET data aiming at providing an accurate quantitative analysis tool is proposed. The initial step involves expectation maximization (EM)-based mixture modeling using a k-means clustering procedure, which varies voxel order for initialization. A multiscale Markov model is then used to refine this segmentation by modeling spatial correlations between neighboring image voxels. An experimental study using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom was conducted for quantitative evaluation of the performance of the proposed segmentation algorithm. The comparison of actual tumor volumes to the volumes calculated using different segmentation methodologies including standard k-means, spatial domain Markov Random Field Model (MRFM), and the new multiscale MRFM proposed in this paper showed that the latter dramatically reduces the relative error to less than 8% for small lesions (7 mm radii) and less than 3.5% for larger lesions (9 mm radii). The analysis of the resulting segmentations of clinical oncologic PET data seems to confirm that this methodology shows promise and can successfully segment patient lesions. For problematic images, this technique enables the identification of tumors situated very close to nearby high normal physiologic uptake. The use of this technique to estimate tumor volumes for assessment of response to therapy and to delineate treatment volumes for the purpose of combined PET/CT-based radiation therapy treatment planning is also discussed. The widespread application of positron emission tomography (PET) in clinical oncology has driven this imaging technology into a number of new research and clinical arenas. Increasing numbers of patient scans have led to an urgent need for efficient data handling and the development of new image analysis techniques to aid clinicians in the diagnosis of disease and planning of treatment. Automatic quantitative assessment of metabolic PET data is attractive and will certainly revolutionize the practice of functional imaging since it can lower variability across institutions and may enhance the consistency of image interpretation independent of reader experience. In this paper, a novel automated system for the segmentation of oncological PET data aiming at providing an accurate quantitative analysis tool is proposed. The initial step involves expectation maximization (EM)-based mixture modeling using a k -means clustering procedure, which varies voxel order for initialization. A multiscale Markov model is then used to refine this segmentation by modeling spatial correlations between neighboring image voxels. An experimental study using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom was conducted for quantitative evaluation of the performance of the proposed segmentation algorithm. The comparison of actual tumor volumes to the volumes calculated using different segmentation methodologies including standard k -means, spatial domain Markov Random Field Model (MRFM), and the new multiscale MRFM proposed in this paper showed that the latter dramatically reduces the relative error to less than 8% for small lesions ( 7 mm radii) and less than 3.5% for larger lesions ( 9 mm radii). The analysis of the resulting segmentations of clinical oncologic PET data seems to confirm that this methodology shows promise and can successfully segment patient lesions. For problematic images, this technique enables the identification of tumors situated very close to nearby high normal physiologic uptake. The use of this technique to estimate tumor volumes for assessment of response to therapy and to delineate treatment volumes for the purpose of combined PET/CT-based radiation therapy treatment planning is also discussed. The widespread application of positron emission tomography (PET) in clinical oncology has driven this imaging technology into a number of new research and clinical arenas. Increasing numbers of patient scans have led to an urgent need for efficient data handling and the development of new image analysis techniques to aid clinicians in the diagnosis of disease and planning of treatment. Automatic quantitative assessment of metabolic PET data is attractive and will certainly revolutionize the practice of functional imaging since it can lower variability across institutions and may enhance the consistency of image interpretation independent of reader experience. In this paper, a novel automated system for the segmentation of oncological PET data aiming at providing an accurate quantitative analysis tool is proposed. The initial step involves expectation maximization (EM)‐based mixture modeling using a k‐means clustering procedure, which varies voxel order for initialization. A multiscale Markov model is then used to refine this segmentation by modeling spatial correlations between neighboring image voxels. An experimental study using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom was conducted for quantitative evaluation of the performance of the proposed segmentation algorithm. The comparison of actual tumor volumes to the volumes calculated using different segmentation methodologies including standard k‐means, spatial domain Markov Random Field Model (MRFM), and the new multiscale MRFM proposed in this paper showed that the latter dramatically reduces the relative error to less than 8% for small lesions (7mm radii) and less than 3.5% for larger lesions (9mm radii). The analysis of the resulting segmentations of clinical oncologic PET data seems to confirm that this methodology shows promise and can successfully segment patient lesions. For problematic images, this technique enables the identification of tumors situated very close to nearby high normal physiologic uptake. The use of this technique to estimate tumor volumes for assessment of response to therapy and to delineate treatment volumes for the purpose of combined PET/CT‐based radiation therapy treatment planning is also discussed.  | 
    
| Author | Zaidi, Habib Montgomery, David W. G. Amira, Abbes  | 
    
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: David W. G. surname: Montgomery fullname: Montgomery, David W. G. organization: School of Electronics, Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, ECIT, The Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland – sequence: 2 givenname: Abbes surname: Amira fullname: Amira, Abbes organization: School of Engineering and Design, Brunel University, London, Uxbridge, United Kingdom – sequence: 3 givenname: Habib surname: Zaidi fullname: Zaidi, Habib organization: Division of Nuclear Medicine, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland  | 
    
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17388190$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://www.osti.gov/biblio/20951062$$D View this record in Osti.gov  | 
    
| BookMark | eNp9kV1rFDEYhYNU7LZ64R-QgCAoTJtkkp2dy1L6IVTsRb0OmeTNGsnHOslU9t-b7WyL-HWVEJ5z3pPzHqGDmCIg9JqSE0rp6pSeMN4yTvgztGC8axvOSH-AFoT0vKnv4hAd5fyNELJsBXmBDmnXrla0JwvkLifvt1hNJQVVwOAM6wCxqOJSxMniFHXyae208vj24g7fJz8FyHjKLq6xwjqFwcUqDJMvLlcMsIrVZ2eRy4MuJAP-JXpulc_wan8eoy-XF3fn183N56uP52c3jeYrwZuOGKZaZSnv7VC_ZDvBh34YuAbRgTWaaWPNkhrSWcO0tkoPSihab4MWom-P0dvZN9XpMmtXQH_VKUbQRdZeBCVLVql3M7UZ0_cJcpGhhgfvVYQ0ZdmRlhHW7sA3e3AaAhi5GV1Q41Y-VliB0xnQY8p5BCvryIf6yqicl5TI3ZIklfslVcX73xRPpn9hm5n94Txs_w3KT7d7_sPM58cUT5r7NP7Cb4z9H_xnkp9867xH | 
    
| CODEN | MPHYA6 | 
    
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2009_02_014 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_111_092767 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_011_2053_0 crossref_primary_10_1088_0031_9155_58_11_3517 crossref_primary_10_1097_RLU_0000000000003789 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2012_01_001 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0178411 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_3160108 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_110_078501 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2014_04_014 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2013_07_027 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2009_08_018 crossref_primary_10_1186_s41824_020_00094_8 crossref_primary_10_1590_S1516_89132007000600010 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_irbm_2009_05_004 crossref_primary_10_1109_TITB_2011_2159307 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_2977537 crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_abf201 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_semnuclmed_2007_01_005 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_3301610 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4863480 crossref_primary_10_1155_2015_571473 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_012_2332_4 crossref_primary_10_1177_153303461000900303 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mednuc_2010_03_005 crossref_primary_10_1155_2013_942353 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_3590359 crossref_primary_10_1109_TIP_2015_2488902 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_3130019 crossref_primary_10_1109_TBME_2013_2288258 crossref_primary_10_4028_www_scientific_net_AMR_143_144_358 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0057105 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11548_013_0910_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cmpb_2012_10_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2010_08_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_canrad_2011_07_243 crossref_primary_10_1155_2010_520427 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cpet_2007_10_001 crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_12531 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4813302 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_010_1688_6 crossref_primary_10_1109_TIP_2018_2872908 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11307_007_0112_5 crossref_primary_10_1088_0031_9155_54_22_010 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4736812 crossref_primary_10_1088_0031_9155_55_4_013 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4828836 crossref_primary_10_1155_2010_105610 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_115_162511 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_110_084897 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_008_0943_6 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_109_068411 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40658_015_0110_7 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_4947123 crossref_primary_10_1120_jacmp_v13i5_3875 crossref_primary_10_1002_mp_12124 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_010_1423_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2010_12_060 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2012_03_031 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_011_2311_3 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_109_066241 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_2938518  | 
    
| Cites_doi | 10.1109/ICPR.1988.28329 10.1016/S0167-8140(03)00270-6 10.1117/12.431071 10.1118/1.1569270 10.1109/NSSMIC.1998.774398 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x 10.1109/TPAMI.2002.1046170 10.1109/ISCAS.2005.1465455 10.1016/0895-6111(96)00025-0 10.1136/jamia.1997.0040327 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.089 10.1109/23.502313 10.1016/j.imavis.2005.02.002 10.1007/0-387-25444-7_10 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1986.tb01412.x 10.1053/snuc.2003.127313 10.1109/42.811270 10.1088/0031-9155/47/7/310 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19971215)80:12 <2505::AID-CNCR24>3.0.CO;2-F 10.1109/42.650883 10.1118/1.2361076 10.1109/INMIC.2003.1416612 10.1088/0031-9155/50/24/014 10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 10.1109/NSSMIC.2001.1009268 10.1017/CBO9780511564352 10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596 10.1016/S0031-3203(04)00190-6 10.1007/978-3-642-56702-5 10.1118/1.596837 10.1109/TPAMI.2004.1262334 10.1007/0-387-25444-7_16 10.1016/0734-189X(88)90022-9  | 
    
| ContentType | Journal Article | 
    
| Copyright | American Association of Physicists in Medicine 2007 American Association of Physicists in Medicine  | 
    
| Copyright_xml | – notice: American Association of Physicists in Medicine – notice: 2007 American Association of Physicists in Medicine  | 
    
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 OTOTI  | 
    
| DOI | 10.1118/1.2432404 | 
    
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic OSTI.GOV  | 
    
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic  | 
    
| DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE  | 
    
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database  | 
    
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc | 
    
| Discipline | Medicine Physics  | 
    
| EISSN | 2473-4209 | 
    
| EndPage | 736 | 
    
| ExternalDocumentID | 20951062 17388190 10_1118_1_2432404 MP2404  | 
    
| Genre | article Evaluation Studies Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article  | 
    
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NSF-CH grantid: SNSF 3152A0-102143 – fundername: NSF‐CH funderid: SNSF 3152A0‐102143  | 
    
| GroupedDBID | --- --Z -DZ .GJ 0R~ 1OB 1OC 29M 2WC 33P 36B 3O- 4.4 476 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS AAHHS AANLZ AAQQT AASGY AAXRX AAZKR ABCUV ABEFU ABFTF ABJNI ABLJU ABQWH ABTAH ABXGK ACAHQ ACBEA ACCFJ ACCZN ACGFO ACGFS ACGOF ACPOU ACSMX ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADBTR ADKYN ADOZA ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEGXH AEIGN AENEX AEQDE AEUYR AFBPY AFFPM AHBTC AIACR AIAGR AIURR AIWBW AJBDE ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMYDB ASPBG BFHJK C45 CS3 DCZOG DRFUL DRMAN DRSTM DU5 EBD EBS EJD EMB EMOBN F5P G8K HDBZQ HGLYW I-F KBYEO LATKE LEEKS LOXES LUTES LYRES MEWTI O9- OVD P2P P2W PALCI PHY RJQFR RNS ROL SAMSI SUPJJ SV3 TEORI TN5 TWZ USG WOHZO WXSBR XJT ZGI ZVN ZXP ZY4 ZZTAW AAHQN AAIPD AAMNL AAYCA ABDPE AFWVQ AITYG ALVPJ AAMMB AAYXX ADMLS AEFGJ AEYWJ AGHNM AGXDD AGYGG AIDQK AIDYY AIQQE CITATION LH4 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 AAJUZ AAPBV ABCVL ABPTK ADDAD AEUQT OTOTI  | 
    
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c4854-70d2a3af149fb404f754b9bb4ce57efdc2cdfd61d07fd2ccfacba5a1ccfbc5593 | 
    
| ISSN | 0094-2405 | 
    
| IngestDate | Thu May 18 22:35:13 EDT 2023 Thu Oct 02 11:08:50 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:42:14 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:53:09 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 01 03:41:44 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 17:07:37 EST 2025 Fri Jun 21 00:29:05 EDT 2024 Sun Jul 14 10:05:19 EDT 2019  | 
    
| IsPeerReviewed | true | 
    
| IsScholarly | true | 
    
| Issue | 2 | 
    
| Keywords | wavelet Gaussian mixture modeling positron emission tomography medical image segmentation multiscale Markov modeling  | 
    
| Language | English | 
    
| License | 0094-2405/2007/34(2)/722/15/$23.00 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor  | 
    
| LinkModel | OpenURL | 
    
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c4854-70d2a3af149fb404f754b9bb4ce57efdc2cdfd61d07fd2ccfacba5a1ccfbc5593 | 
    
| Notes | habib.zaidi@hcuge.ch Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23  | 
    
| PMID | 17388190 | 
    
| PQID | 70320232 | 
    
| PQPubID | 23479 | 
    
| PageCount | 15 | 
    
| ParticipantIDs | scitation_primary_10_1118_1_2432404 crossref_citationtrail_10_1118_1_2432404 osti_scitechconnect_20951062 crossref_primary_10_1118_1_2432404 wiley_primary_10_1118_1_2432404_MP2404 proquest_miscellaneous_70320232 pubmed_primary_17388190  | 
    
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX  | 
    
| PublicationCentury | 2000 | 
    
| PublicationDate | February 2007 | 
    
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2007-02-01 | 
    
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2007 text: February 2007  | 
    
| PublicationDecade | 2000 | 
    
| PublicationPlace | United States | 
    
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States | 
    
| PublicationTitle | Medical physics (Lancaster) | 
    
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Med Phys | 
    
| PublicationYear | 2007 | 
    
| Publisher | American Association of Physicists in Medicine | 
    
| Publisher_xml | – name: American Association of Physicists in Medicine | 
    
| References | Zaidi, Montandon, Slosman (c4) 2003; 30 Dempster, Laird, Rubin (c24) 1977; 39 Greenspan, Goldberger, Mayer (c28) 2004; 26 Van Leemput, Maes, Vandermeulen, Suetens (c22) 1999; 18 Keyes (c2) 1995; 36 Stanford, Raftery (c31) 2002; 24 Kalet, Austin-Seymour (c6) 1997; 4 Long, King, Sheehan (c16) 1992; 19 Geman, Geman (c21) 1984; 6 Erdi (c14) 1997; 80 Otsu (c12) 1979; 9 Ford (c9) 2006; 33 Besag (c33) 1986; 48 Boudraa (c5) 1996; 20 Murtagh, Raftery, Starck (c32) 2005; 23 Bijaoui, Starck, Murtagh (c37) 1994; 3 Paulino, Thorstad, Fox (c8) 2003; 33 Sahoo, Soltani, Wong (c11) 1988; 41 Held (c20) 1997; 16 Collet, Murtagh (c34) 2004; 37 Zaidi, Diaz-Gomez, Boudraa, Slosman (c3) 2002; 47 Daisne (c17) 2003; 69 Ciernik, Huser, Burger, Davis, Szekely (c7) 2005; 62 Yaremko (c15) 2005; 50 Zaidi (c18) 1996; 43 1997; 80 1995; 36 2006; 33 2004; 26 2005; 62 1998 1997 1992; 19 2007 2006 2005 2003; 30 1997; 4 2005; 23 2003; 33 1999 2002; 47 4322 2001 1977; 39 1999; 18 2001; 4 2002; 24 2004; 37 1984; 6 1986; 48 2003; 69 1997; 16 1998; 2 1988; 41 2005; 50 1994; 3 1996; 43 1996; 20 1979; 9 1988 e_1_2_7_6_1 e_1_2_7_5_1 e_1_2_7_4_1 e_1_2_7_9_1 e_1_2_7_8_1 e_1_2_7_7_1 e_1_2_7_19_1 e_1_2_7_18_1 e_1_2_7_17_1 e_1_2_7_16_1 e_1_2_7_40_1 e_1_2_7_2_1 e_1_2_7_15_1 e_1_2_7_41_1 e_1_2_7_14_1 e_1_2_7_42_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_43_1 e_1_2_7_12_1 e_1_2_7_11_1 e_1_2_7_10_1 McLachlan G. (e_1_2_7_27_1) 1997 e_1_2_7_28_1 e_1_2_7_29_1 Wishart D. (e_1_2_7_30_1) 2006 Keyes J. (e_1_2_7_3_1) 1995; 36 Congdon P. (e_1_2_7_26_1) 2007 e_1_2_7_25_1 e_1_2_7_31_1 Li S. (e_1_2_7_20_1) 2001 e_1_2_7_24_1 e_1_2_7_32_1 e_1_2_7_23_1 e_1_2_7_33_1 e_1_2_7_22_1 e_1_2_7_34_1 e_1_2_7_21_1 e_1_2_7_35_1 e_1_2_7_36_1 e_1_2_7_37_1 e_1_2_7_39_1 Bijaoui A. (e_1_2_7_38_1) 1994; 3  | 
    
| References_xml | – volume: 16 start-page: 878 issn: 0278-0062 year: 1997 ident: c20 article-title: Markov random field segmentation of brain MR images publication-title: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging – volume: 9 start-page: 62 issn: 0018-9472 year: 1979 ident: c12 article-title: A thresholding selection method from gray-level histograms publication-title: IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. – volume: 37 start-page: 2337 issn: 0031-3203 year: 2004 ident: c34 article-title: Multiband segmentation based on a hierarchical Markov model publication-title: Pattern Recogn. – volume: 33 start-page: 4280 issn: 0094-2405 year: 2006 ident: c9 article-title: Tumor delineation using PET in head and neck cancers: Threshold contouring and lesion volumes publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 30 start-page: 937 issn: 0094-2405 year: 2003 ident: c4 article-title: Magnetic resonance imaging-guided attenuation and scatter corrections in three-dimensional brain positron emission tomography publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 48 start-page: 259 issn: 0035-9246 year: 1986 ident: c33 article-title: On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures publication-title: J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) – volume: 69 start-page: 247 issn: 0167-8140 year: 2003 ident: c17 article-title: Tri-dimensional automatic segmentation of PET volumes based on measured source-to-background ratios: influence of reconstruction algorithms publication-title: Radiother. Oncol. – volume: 47 start-page: 1143 issn: 0031-9155 year: 2002 ident: c3 article-title: Fuzzy clustering-based segmented attenuation correction in whole-body PET imaging publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 18 start-page: 897 issn: 0278-0062 year: 1999 ident: c22 article-title: Automated model-based tissue classification of MR images of the brain publication-title: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging – volume: 20 start-page: 31 issn: 0895-6111 year: 1996 ident: c5 article-title: Delineation and quantitation of brain lesions by fuzzy clustering in positron emission tomography publication-title: Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. – volume: 39 start-page: 1 issn: 0035-9246 year: 1977 ident: c24 article-title: Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm publication-title: J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) – volume: 80 start-page: 2505 issn: 0008-543X year: 1997 ident: c14 article-title: Segmentation of lung lesion volume by adaptive positrone mission tomography image thresholding publication-title: Cancer – volume: 62 start-page: 893 issn: 0360-3016 year: 2005 ident: c7 article-title: Automated functional image-guided radiation treatment planning for rectal cancer publication-title: Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys. – volume: 4 start-page: 327 issn: 1067-5027 year: 1997 ident: c6 article-title: The use of medical images in planning and delivery of radiation therapy publication-title: J. Am. Med. Inform Assoc. – volume: 23 start-page: 587 issn: 0262-8856 year: 2005 ident: c32 article-title: Bayesian inference for multiband image segmentation via model-based cluster trees publication-title: Image Vis. Comput. – volume: 3 start-page: 229 issn: 0765-0019 year: 1994 ident: c37 article-title: Restauration des images multi-échelles par l’algorithme á trous publication-title: Trait. Signal – volume: 36 start-page: 1836 issn: 0161-5505 year: 1995 ident: c2 article-title: SUV: Standard uptake value or silly useless value? publication-title: J. Nucl. Med. – volume: 50 start-page: 5969 issn: 0031-9155 year: 2005 ident: c15 article-title: Thresholding in PET images of static and moving targets publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 26 start-page: 384 issn: 0162-8828 year: 2004 ident: c28 article-title: Probabilistic space-time video modeling via piecewise GMM publication-title: IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. – volume: 6 start-page: 721 issn: 0162-8828 year: 1984 ident: c21 article-title: Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions and the bayesian restoration of images publication-title: IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. – volume: 33 start-page: 238 issn: 0001-2998 year: 2003 ident: c8 article-title: Role of fusion in radiotherapy treatment planning publication-title: Semin Nucl. Med. – volume: 43 start-page: 2174 issn: 0018-9499 year: 1996 ident: c18 article-title: Organ volume estimation using SPECT publication-title: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. – volume: 19 start-page: 483 issn: 0094-2405 year: 1992 ident: c16 article-title: Comparative evaluation of image segmentation methods for volume quantitation in SPECT publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 24 start-page: 1517 issn: 0162-8828 year: 2002 ident: c31 article-title: Approximate Bayes factors for image segmentation: The pseudolikelihood information criterion (PLIC) publication-title: IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. – volume: 41 start-page: 233 issn: 0734-189X year: 1988 ident: c11 article-title: A survey of thresholding techniques publication-title: Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process. – volume: 6 start-page: 721 year: 1984 end-page: 741 article-title: Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions and the bayesian restoration of images publication-title: IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. – volume: 33 start-page: 4280 year: 2006 end-page: 4288 article-title: Tumor delineation using PET in head and neck cancers: Threshold contouring and lesion volumes publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 50 start-page: 5969 year: 2005 end-page: 5982 article-title: Thresholding in PET images of static and moving targets publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – volume: 36 start-page: 1836 year: 1995 end-page: 1839 article-title: SUV: Standard uptake value or silly useless value? publication-title: J. Nucl. Med. – volume: 69 start-page: 247 year: 2003 end-page: 250 article-title: Tri‐dimensional automatic segmentation of PET volumes based on measured source‐to‐background ratios: influence of reconstruction algorithms publication-title: Radiother. Oncol. – volume: 18 start-page: 897 year: 1999 end-page: 908 article-title: Automated model‐based tissue classification of MR images of the brain publication-title: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging – start-page: 38 end-page: 43 – year: 2005 – volume: 2 start-page: 1323 year: 1998 end-page: 1329 – volume: 47 start-page: 1143 year: 2002 end-page: 1160 article-title: Fuzzy clustering‐based segmented attenuation correction in whole‐body PET imaging publication-title: Phys. Med. Biol. – year: 2001 – year: 2007 – volume: 16 start-page: 878 year: 1997 end-page: 886 article-title: Markov random field segmentation of brain MR images publication-title: IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging – volume: 19 start-page: 483 year: 1992 end-page: 489 article-title: Comparative evaluation of image segmentation methods for volume quantitation in SPECT publication-title: Med. Phys. – volume: 43 start-page: 2174 year: 1996 end-page: 2182 article-title: Organ volume estimation using SPECT publication-title: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. – volume: 4 start-page: 327 year: 1997 end-page: 339 article-title: The use of medical images in planning and delivery of radiation therapy publication-title: J. Am. Med. Inform Assoc. – volume: 62 start-page: 893 year: 2005 end-page: 900 article-title: Automated functional image‐guided radiation treatment planning for rectal cancer publication-title: Int. J. Radiat. Oncol., Biol., Phys. – volume: 41 start-page: 233 year: 1988 end-page: 260 article-title: A survey of thresholding techniques publication-title: Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process. – year: 1998 – volume: 26 start-page: 384 year: 2004 end-page: 396 article-title: Probabilistic space‐time video modeling via piecewise GMM publication-title: IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. – volume: 4 start-page: 2234 year: 2001 end-page: 2237 – volume: 30 start-page: 937 year: 2003 end-page: 948 article-title: Magnetic resonance imaging‐guided attenuation and scatter corrections in three‐dimensional brain positron emission tomography publication-title: Med. Phys. – start-page: 308 year: 2006 end-page: 357 – volume: 48 start-page: 259 year: 1986 end-page: 302 article-title: On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures publication-title: J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) – volume: 20 start-page: 31 year: 1996 end-page: 41 article-title: Delineation and quantitation of brain lesions by fuzzy clustering in positron emission tomography publication-title: Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. – start-page: 3789 end-page: 3792 – volume: 80 start-page: 2505 year: 1997 end-page: 2509 article-title: Segmentation of lung lesion volume by adaptive positrone mission tomography image thresholding publication-title: Cancer – volume: 24 start-page: 1517 year: 2002 end-page: 1520 article-title: Approximate Bayes factors for image segmentation: The pseudolikelihood information criterion (PLIC) publication-title: IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. – volume: 37 start-page: 2337 year: 2004 end-page: 2347 article-title: Multiband segmentation based on a hierarchical Markov model publication-title: Pattern Recogn. – volume: 3 start-page: 229 year: 1994 end-page: 243 article-title: Restauration des images multi‐échelles par l'algorithme á trous publication-title: Trait. Signal – year: 2006 – year: 1997 – start-page: 494 year: 2006 end-page: 536 – start-page: 689 year: 1988 end-page: 692 – volume: 4322 start-page: 184 end-page: 193 – volume: 39 start-page: 1 year: 1977 end-page: 38 article-title: Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data via the EM algorithm publication-title: J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodol.) – volume: 9 start-page: 62 year: 1979 end-page: 66 article-title: A thresholding selection method from gray‐level histograms publication-title: IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. – volume: 23 start-page: 587 year: 2005 end-page: 596 article-title: Bayesian inference for multiband image segmentation via model‐based cluster trees publication-title: Image Vis. Comput. – volume: 33 start-page: 238 year: 2003 end-page: 243 article-title: Role of fusion in radiotherapy treatment planning publication-title: Semin Nucl. Med. – year: 1999 – ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 doi: 10.1109/ICPR.1988.28329 – ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 doi: 10.1016/S0167-8140(03)00270-6 – ident: e_1_2_7_24_1 doi: 10.1117/12.431071 – ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 doi: 10.1118/1.1569270 – ident: e_1_2_7_42_1 doi: 10.1109/NSSMIC.1998.774398 – ident: e_1_2_7_25_1 doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x – ident: e_1_2_7_32_1 doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2002.1046170 – ident: e_1_2_7_40_1 doi: 10.1109/ISCAS.2005.1465455 – volume: 36 start-page: 1836 year: 1995 ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 article-title: SUV: Standard uptake value or silly useless value? publication-title: J. Nucl. Med. – ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 doi: 10.1016/0895-6111(96)00025-0 – ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 doi: 10.1136/jamia.1997.0040327 – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.12.089 – ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 doi: 10.1109/23.502313 – ident: e_1_2_7_28_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_33_1 doi: 10.1016/j.imavis.2005.02.002 – ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 doi: 10.1007/0-387-25444-7_10 – ident: e_1_2_7_34_1 doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1986.tb01412.x – volume: 3 start-page: 229 year: 1994 ident: e_1_2_7_38_1 article-title: Restauration des images multi‐échelles par l'algorithme á trous publication-title: Trait. Signal – ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 doi: 10.1053/snuc.2003.127313 – ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 doi: 10.1109/42.811270 – ident: e_1_2_7_41_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/7/310 – ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19971215)80:12 <2505::AID-CNCR24>3.0.CO;2-F – volume-title: The EM Algorithm and Extensions year: 1997 ident: e_1_2_7_27_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 doi: 10.1109/42.650883 – ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 doi: 10.1118/1.2361076 – ident: e_1_2_7_36_1 doi: 10.1109/INMIC.2003.1416612 – volume-title: Bayesian Statistical Modelling year: 2007 ident: e_1_2_7_26_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/24/014 – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076 – ident: e_1_2_7_43_1 doi: 10.1109/NSSMIC.2001.1009268 – ident: e_1_2_7_37_1 doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511564352 – volume-title: Markov Random Field Modeling in Computer Vision year: 2001 ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.1984.4767596 – ident: e_1_2_7_35_1 doi: 10.1016/S0031-3203(04)00190-6 – ident: e_1_2_7_39_1 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-56702-5 – ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 doi: 10.1118/1.596837 – ident: e_1_2_7_29_1 doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2004.1262334 – ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 doi: 10.1007/0-387-25444-7_16 – ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 doi: 10.1016/0734-189X(88)90022-9 – volume-title: Clustan Graphics Primer: A Guide to Cluster Analysis year: 2006 ident: e_1_2_7_30_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_31_1  | 
    
| SSID | ssj0006350 | 
    
| Score | 2.1916664 | 
    
| Snippet | The widespread application of positron emission tomography (PET) in clinical oncology has driven this imaging technology into a number of new research and... | 
    
| SourceID | osti proquest pubmed crossref wiley scitation  | 
    
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher  | 
    
| StartPage | 722 | 
    
| SubjectTerms | ALGORITHMS Algorithms for functional approximation Artificial Intelligence Biomedical modeling cancer CHEST Cluster analysis Computer Simulation Data Interpretation, Statistical DIAGNOSIS Diseases ERRORS expectation‐maximisation algorithm Gaussian mixture modeling Humans Image analysis Image Enhancement - methods Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods IMAGE PROCESSING image segmentation Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods MARKOV PROCESS Markov processes medical image processing medical image segmentation Medical imaging Models, Biological Models, Statistical multiscale Markov modeling Multiscale methods NEOPLASMS Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging PATIENTS pattern clustering Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods PHANTOMS Phantoms, Imaging PLANNING POSITRON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY positron emission tomography Positron emission tomography (PET) Positron-Emission Tomography - instrumentation Positron-Emission Tomography - methods radiation therapy RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE RADIOTHERAPY Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity SIMULATION Spatial analysis STATISTICAL MODELS tumours wavelet Wavelets  | 
    
| Title | Fully automated segmentation of oncological PET volumes using a combined multiscale and statistical model | 
    
| URI | http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2432404 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1118%2F1.2432404 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17388190 https://www.proquest.com/docview/70320232 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/20951062  | 
    
| Volume | 34 | 
    
| hasFullText | 1 | 
    
| inHoldings | 1 | 
    
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVEBS databaseName: Inspec with Full Text customDbUrl: eissn: 2473-4209 dateEnd: 20241102 omitProxy: false ssIdentifier: ssj0006350 issn: 0094-2405 databaseCode: ADMLS dateStart: 20070101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.ebsco.com/products/research-databases/inspec-full-text providerName: EBSCOhost  | 
    
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bi9NAFB60i7cH0fUWXXVQEaFE20nSNI9FVxaxUrCLiy_DXNeATUqbCvrrPXPJpZAV9aUN6WkS8n05Od-Zc2YQemGChIRlHJ5v0CYgICZhlkYyJFEqFJBaJLFpFJ5_mpycxh_OkrO2hcB2l1T8tfjV21fyP6jCPsDVdMn-A7LNQWEHbAO-8AkIw-dfYWz0488h21UlxJ0QOW7V-cr3EtkosCxE49sWx8uhc0Xb4c4mCJipJwdhDH-0ZYVbMHODCabLyE7gbFpLzFI53RC2HtpxORGbtDWN1Mwt8dHkFcBZVOflSvlhelM6P_zSruQ1W-Ubl9LlvC1j_Mpy6ZbRZjznexmJtC5ibr1sFptRm6TrZX3KMu-IXecyU9eX3OPKTXsCSHg7Z2DctQEU1iuL6TiNpiamad9mTY1h_dNldEDA448G6GD2bv7xc_OehlDLNSj5q_XzTsF53zRnNXPK-uPsBS6DEkDoEyU30DUIXRzQ-3rHBizLW-imVxp45mhzG11SxSG6Ove1FIfoysIBeAfllke44RHu8giXGnd4hIFH2PMIWx5hhmse4ZZHGHiEOzzClkd30en74-Xbk9AvwRGKeJrEYTqShEVMg47WHO6HTpOYZ5zHQiWp0lIQIbWcjOUo1ZIIoZngLGFj2OICxGp0Dw2KslAPEOYyI4kiksVaxCQlPMqEhuhSc83AM6gAvarvL63voFkm5Tt1OnVKx9SjEqBnjenaTcrSZ3RkQKIGDiW-CVM3JipKrKaYkAA9rcGj4FHNMBkrVLnbUngHEohkweK-w7Q9h6dCgJ43IP_pAnqsfpSb1oKupQ7QS0uSi49D5wvz9fDCy3mErreP4REaVJudegyhcsWfeM7_Bjtqu4A | 
    
| linkProvider | EBSCOhost | 
    
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fully+automated+segmentation+of+oncological+PET+volumes+using+a+combined+multiscale+and+statistical+model&rft.jtitle=Medical+physics+%28Lancaster%29&rft.au=Montgomery%2C+David+W+G&rft.au=Amira%2C+Abbes&rft.au=Zaidi%2C+Habib&rft.date=2007-02-01&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=722&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118%2F1.2432404&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F17388190&rft.externalDocID=17388190 | 
    
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon | 
    
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon | 
    
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0094-2405&client=summon |