Admission Urinary and Serum Metabolites Predict Renal Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients With Cirrhosis

Background and Aims Acute kidney injury (AKI) has a poor prognosis in cirrhosis. Given the variability of creatinine, the prediction of AKI and dialysis by other markers is needed. The aim of this study is to determine the role of serum and urine metabolomics in the prediction of AKI and dialysis in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHepatology (Baltimore, Md.) Vol. 74; no. 5; pp. 2699 - 2713
Main Authors Bajaj, Jasmohan S., Garcia‐Tsao, Guadalupe, Reddy, K. Rajender, O’Leary, Jacqueline G., Vargas, Hugo E., Lai, Jennifer C., Kamath, Patrick S., Tandon, Puneeta, Subramanian, Ram M., Thuluvath, Paul, Fagan, Andrew, Sehrawat, Tejasav, Rosa Rodriguez, Randolph, Thacker, Leroy R., Wong, Florence
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc 01.11.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0270-9139
1527-3350
1527-3350
DOI10.1002/hep.31907

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background and Aims Acute kidney injury (AKI) has a poor prognosis in cirrhosis. Given the variability of creatinine, the prediction of AKI and dialysis by other markers is needed. The aim of this study is to determine the role of serum and urine metabolomics in the prediction of AKI and dialysis in an inpatient cirrhosis cohort. Approach and Results Inpatients with cirrhosis from 11 North American Consortium of End‐stage Liver Disease centers who provided admission serum/urine when they were AKI and dialysis‐free were included. Analysis of covariance adjusted for demographics, infection, and cirrhosis severity was performed to identify metabolites that differed among patients (1) who developed AKI or not; (2) required dialysis or not; and/pr (3) within AKI subgroups who needed dialysis or not. We performed random forest and AUC analyses to identify specific metabolite(s) associated with outcomes. Logistic regression with clinical variables with/without metabolites was performed. A total of 602 patients gave serum (218 developed AKI, 80 needed dialysis) and 435 gave urine (164 developed AKI, 61 needed dialysis). For AKI prediction, clinical factor–adjusted AUC was 0.91 for serum and 0.88 for urine. Major metabolites such as uremic toxins (2,3‐dihydroxy‐5‐methylthio‐4‐pentenoic acid [DMTPA], N2N2dimethylguanosine, uridine/pseudouridine) and tryptophan/tyrosine metabolites (kynunerate, 8‐methoxykyunerate, quinolinate) were higher in patients who developed AKI. For dialysis prediction, clinical factor–adjusted AUC was 0.93 for serum and 0.91 for urine. Similar metabolites as AKI were altered here. For dialysis prediction in those with AKI, the AUC was 0.81 and 0.79 for serum/urine. Lower branched‐chain amino‐acid (BCAA) metabolites but higher cysteine, tryptophan, glutamate, and DMTPA were seen in patients with AKI needing dialysis. Serum/urine metabolites were additive to clinical variables for all outcomes. Conclusions Specific admission urinary and serum metabolites were significantly additive to clinical variables to predict AKI development and dialysis initiation in inpatients with cirrhosis. These observations can potentially facilitate earlier initiation of renoprotective measures.
Bibliography:Potential conflict of interest: Dr. Reddy advises and received grants from Mallinckrodt. He received grants from Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Gilead, Merck, Intercept, Sequana, Grifols, and Exact Sciences. Dr. O’Leary is on the speakers’ bureau for Gilead and AbbVie.
Supported by VA Merit Review (I0CX00176) and National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences/National Institutes of Health (R21TR003095 and R21TR002024) and investigator‐initiated grants from Grifols and Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Author Contributions: All authors were involved in substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published.
ISSN:0270-9139
1527-3350
1527-3350
DOI:10.1002/hep.31907