Clinical Significance of Adropin and Afamin in Evaluating Renal Function and Cardiovascular Health in the Presence of CKD-MBD Biomarkers in Chronic Kidney Disease

• Published in: Diagnostics (Basel) Vol. 13; no. 19; p. 3158
• Main Authors: Kaur, Rupinder, Krishan, Pawan, Kumari, Pratima, Singh, Tanveer, Singh, Varinder, Singh, Ravinder, Ahmad, Sheikh F.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Basel MDPI AG 09.10.2023; MDPI
• Subjects: adropin; afamin; biomarker; Biomarkers; Blood pressure; Blood vessels; Calcification; cardiovascular; Cardiovascular disease; Cholesterol; CKD; CKD-MBD; Clinical significance; Diabetes; Heart; High density lipoprotein; Homeostasis; Hyperlipidemia; Hypertension; Inflammation; Kidney diseases; Kinases; Lipids; Metabolic disorders; Metabolic syndrome; Mortality; Proteins; Smooth muscle; Variance analysis; Vitamin D; Vitamin E
• ISSN: 2075-4418; 2075-4418
• DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13193158

Aim: The study aims to test the hypothesis that concentrations of adropin and afamin differ between patients in various stages of chronic kidney disease when compared with healthy controls. The study also investigates the association of the biomarkers (adropin and afamin) with CKD-MBD and traditional cardiovascular risk parameters in CKD patients. Methodology: The cross-sectional study includes the subjects divided into four groups comprising the control group (healthy volunteers = 50), CKD stages 1–2 patients (n = 50), CKD stages 3–4 patients (n = 50), CKD stage 5 patients (n = 50). Serum concentrations of adropin and afamin were determined using ELISA. Clinical variables (renal, lipid, and CKD-MBD parameters) were correlated to adropin and afamin concentrations. Results: Afamin concentration was found to be higher in group IV, followed by groups III and II when compared to the control group, i.e., (83.243 ± 1.46, 64.233 ± 0.99, and 28.948 ± 0.72 vs. 14.476 ± 0.5) mg/L (p < 0.001), and adropin concentration was found to be lower in group IV as compared to groups III, II, and I (200.342 ± 8.37 vs. 284.682 ± 9.89 vs. 413.208 ± 12.32 vs. 706.542 ± 11.32) pg/mL (p < 0.001), respectively. Pearson correlation analysis showed that afamin was positively correlated with traditional cardiovascular risk biomarkers, while adropin showed a negative correlation. Conclusions: Adropin and afamin may potentially serve as futuristic predictors for the deterioration of renal function and may be involved in the pathological mechanisms of CKD and its associated complications such as CKD-MBD and high lipid levels.