Multi-Institutional Review of Outcomes and Complications of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation for Treatment of Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children
Purpose Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to open ureteral reimplantation for correcting primary vesicoureteral reflux in children. However, in the current literature there are conflicting data regarding the safety...
Saved in:
Published in | The Journal of urology Vol. 197; no. 6; pp. 1555 - 1561 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.06.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0022-5347 1527-3792 1527-3792 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062 |
Cover
Abstract | Purpose Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to open ureteral reimplantation for correcting primary vesicoureteral reflux in children. However, in the current literature there are conflicting data regarding the safety and efficacy of this approach. Amid ongoing debate we analyzed outcomes and complications from this procedure in a large multi-institutional cohort. Materials and Methods We reviewed the records of children who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation at 9 academic centers from 2005 to 2014. Radiographic failure was defined as persistent vesicoureteral reflux on postoperative voiding cystourethrogram or radionuclide cystogram. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo scale. Results A total of 260 patients (363 ureters) underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux during the study period. The cohort included 90 patients with either duplex ureter (42), failed endoscopic treatment (40) or concomitant diverticulectomy (8). Of the 280 ureters with postoperative voiding cystourethrogram or radionuclide cystogram available radiographic resolution was seen in 246 (87.9%). There were 25 complications overall (9.6%), with 7 grade 3 complications (2.7%) and no grade 4 or 5 complications. Four patients (3.9%) had transient urinary retention following bilateral reimplantation. Conclusions Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has a low complication rate consistent with published series of open ureteral reimplantation. Radiographic success rates are approaching those of the open procedure but continue to fall short of the gold standard approach. These findings necessitate critical thinking regarding potential technique improvements and further prospective investigation into the efficacy of this procedure. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to open ureteral reimplantation for correcting primary vesicoureteral reflux in children. However, in the current literature there are conflicting data regarding the safety and efficacy of this approach. Amid ongoing debate we analyzed outcomes and complications from this procedure in a large multi-institutional cohort.PURPOSERobot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to open ureteral reimplantation for correcting primary vesicoureteral reflux in children. However, in the current literature there are conflicting data regarding the safety and efficacy of this approach. Amid ongoing debate we analyzed outcomes and complications from this procedure in a large multi-institutional cohort.We reviewed the records of children who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation at 9 academic centers from 2005 to 2014. Radiographic failure was defined as persistent vesicoureteral reflux on postoperative voiding cystourethrogram or radionuclide cystogram. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo scale.MATERIALS AND METHODSWe reviewed the records of children who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation at 9 academic centers from 2005 to 2014. Radiographic failure was defined as persistent vesicoureteral reflux on postoperative voiding cystourethrogram or radionuclide cystogram. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo scale.A total of 260 patients (363 ureters) underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux during the study period. The cohort included 90 patients with either duplex ureter (42), failed endoscopic treatment (40) or concomitant diverticulectomy (8). Of the 280 ureters with postoperative voiding cystourethrogram or radionuclide cystogram available radiographic resolution was seen in 246 (87.9%). There were 25 complications overall (9.6%), with 7 grade 3 complications (2.7%) and no grade 4 or 5 complications. Four patients (3.9%) had transient urinary retention following bilateral reimplantation.RESULTSA total of 260 patients (363 ureters) underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux during the study period. The cohort included 90 patients with either duplex ureter (42), failed endoscopic treatment (40) or concomitant diverticulectomy (8). Of the 280 ureters with postoperative voiding cystourethrogram or radionuclide cystogram available radiographic resolution was seen in 246 (87.9%). There were 25 complications overall (9.6%), with 7 grade 3 complications (2.7%) and no grade 4 or 5 complications. Four patients (3.9%) had transient urinary retention following bilateral reimplantation.Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has a low complication rate consistent with published series of open ureteral reimplantation. Radiographic success rates are approaching those of the open procedure but continue to fall short of the gold standard approach. These findings necessitate critical thinking regarding potential technique improvements and further prospective investigation into the efficacy of this procedure.CONCLUSIONSRobot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has a low complication rate consistent with published series of open ureteral reimplantation. Radiographic success rates are approaching those of the open procedure but continue to fall short of the gold standard approach. These findings necessitate critical thinking regarding potential technique improvements and further prospective investigation into the efficacy of this procedure. Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to open ureteral reimplantation for correcting primary vesicoureteral reflux in children. However, in the current literature there are conflicting data regarding the safety and efficacy of this approach. Amid ongoing debate we analyzed outcomes and complications from this procedure in a large multi-institutional cohort. We reviewed the records of children who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation at 9 academic centers from 2005 to 2014. Radiographic failure was defined as persistent vesicoureteral reflux on postoperative voiding cystourethrogram or radionuclide cystogram. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo scale. A total of 260 patients (363 ureters) underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux during the study period. The cohort included 90 patients with either duplex ureter (42), failed endoscopic treatment (40) or concomitant diverticulectomy (8). Of the 280 ureters with postoperative voiding cystourethrogram or radionuclide cystogram available radiographic resolution was seen in 246 (87.9%). There were 25 complications overall (9.6%), with 7 grade 3 complications (2.7%) and no grade 4 or 5 complications. Four patients (3.9%) had transient urinary retention following bilateral reimplantation. Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has a low complication rate consistent with published series of open ureteral reimplantation. Radiographic success rates are approaching those of the open procedure but continue to fall short of the gold standard approach. These findings necessitate critical thinking regarding potential technique improvements and further prospective investigation into the efficacy of this procedure. Purpose Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to open ureteral reimplantation for correcting primary vesicoureteral reflux in children. However, in the current literature there are conflicting data regarding the safety and efficacy of this approach. Amid ongoing debate we analyzed outcomes and complications from this procedure in a large multi-institutional cohort. Materials and Methods We reviewed the records of children who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation at 9 academic centers from 2005 to 2014. Radiographic failure was defined as persistent vesicoureteral reflux on postoperative voiding cystourethrogram or radionuclide cystogram. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo scale. Results A total of 260 patients (363 ureters) underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux during the study period. The cohort included 90 patients with either duplex ureter (42), failed endoscopic treatment (40) or concomitant diverticulectomy (8). Of the 280 ureters with postoperative voiding cystourethrogram or radionuclide cystogram available radiographic resolution was seen in 246 (87.9%). There were 25 complications overall (9.6%), with 7 grade 3 complications (2.7%) and no grade 4 or 5 complications. Four patients (3.9%) had transient urinary retention following bilateral reimplantation. Conclusions Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has a low complication rate consistent with published series of open ureteral reimplantation. Radiographic success rates are approaching those of the open procedure but continue to fall short of the gold standard approach. These findings necessitate critical thinking regarding potential technique improvements and further prospective investigation into the efficacy of this procedure. |
Author | Noh, Paul Shukla, Aseem Boysen, William R Kirsch, Andrew Ellison, Jonathan S Kim, Christina Palmer, Blake Koh, Chester J Whittam, Benjamin Gundeti, Mohan S |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Boysen, William R – sequence: 2 fullname: Ellison, Jonathan S – sequence: 3 fullname: Kim, Christina – sequence: 4 fullname: Koh, Chester J – sequence: 5 fullname: Noh, Paul – sequence: 6 fullname: Whittam, Benjamin – sequence: 7 fullname: Palmer, Blake – sequence: 8 fullname: Shukla, Aseem – sequence: 9 fullname: Kirsch, Andrew – sequence: 10 fullname: Gundeti, Mohan S |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28130103$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kstu1TAYhC1URE8LL8ACeckmwZfcjoSQqqMClQ4qKi1by7H_CIfEDrbTy5PxejhNAamLrrzwfCP9M3OEDqyzgNBrSnJKaPWuz_vZu5wRWueE5qRiz9CGlqzOeL1lB2hDCGNZyYv6EB2F0BNCi7JmL9AhaygnlPAN-v1lHqLJzmyIJs7ROCsHfAHXBm6w6_D5HJUbIWBpNd65cRqMkosqLL8XrnUxOwnBhAga7-UkvQvKTUbh09vo5TWEpB_wlYcI_t7ZJA9p470J7pzHlx5kHMHGxfGrN6P0d_j7Arr5P9YN8y02Fu9-mEF7sC_R804OAV49vMfo6uPp5e5ztj__dLY72WeqqOuYtQ3RvCCsVJLRkjLaVNCA6jrd8W3ZMCKp1kXFoWS0hQJ0paRut8AVk6yrJT9Gb1ffybtfM4QoRhMUDOkGcHMQyZDVFeFNlaRvHqRzO4IW03qL-Bt2ErBVoFJKwUP3T0KJWBoVvVgaFUujglCRGk1Q8whSZk0v5WuGp9H3KwopoNSoF0EZsAq08aCi0M48jX94hKvB2KXPn3AHoU_1pLGkCERggohvy9qWsdGaE9I0Jf8DupnWkA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2024_10_030 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11884_022_00658_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2019_07_024 crossref_primary_10_3165_jjpn_rv_2018_0004 crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2019_0619 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2021_06_043 crossref_primary_10_1089_vid_2018_0008 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00383_024_05908_5 crossref_primary_10_1111_ases_12653 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1905_4636 crossref_primary_10_3389_fped_2019_00187 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpedsurg_2022_07_002 crossref_primary_10_4103_iju_iju_276_22 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00383_020_04749_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2018_02_018 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2018_04_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2017_03_095 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2022_10_024 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sempedsurg_2021_151082 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2018_01_020 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40137_023_00375_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sempedsurg_2021_151086 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolvj_2019_100021 crossref_primary_10_17116_endoskop20243001160 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2020_03_005 crossref_primary_10_1590_s1677_5538_ibju_2020_99_03 crossref_primary_10_1590_s1677_5538_ibju_2020_99_05 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_019_02753_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00383_024_05948_x crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0043_1764321 crossref_primary_10_3389_fped_2019_00085 crossref_primary_10_3389_fped_2023_1120831 crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2020_0158 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_023_01523_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2024_10_063 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euf_2017_08_012 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_022_01437_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11934_018_0794_z crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11051327 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2017_03_112 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2018_08_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radcr_2024_08_113 crossref_primary_10_3346_jkms_2018_33_e240 crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2018_29045_vid crossref_primary_10_3389_fped_2022_935082 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40746_024_00300_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2023_07_013 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_019_02766_y crossref_primary_10_3389_fped_2019_00093 crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2018_0745 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.juro.2010.05.065 10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.04.006 10.1089/08927790050152203 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65240-8 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.002 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.072 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.01.028 10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.02.006 10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.056 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35604-5 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.12.007 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.009 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.02.013 10.1016/j.juro.2016.11.033 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.128 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae 10.1136/bmj.f2820 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64882-1 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.11.007 10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.052 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.03.014 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.069 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.065 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.065 10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.060 10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.084 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. 2017 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Copyright © 2017 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. – notice: 2017 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. – notice: Copyright © 2017 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1527-3792 |
EndPage | 1561 |
ExternalDocumentID | 28130103 10_1016_j_juro_2017_01_062 S0022534717300885 1_s2_0_S0022534717300885 |
Genre | Multicenter Study Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- --K .55 .GJ .XZ 08P 0R~ 123 1B1 1CY 354 3O- 4.4 457 4G. 4Q1 4Q2 4Q3 53G 5RE 5VS 7-5 AAAAV AAEDT AAEDW AAGIX AAHPQ AAIQE AAJCS AAKAS AALRI AAMOA AAQFI AAQKA AAQQT AAQXK AASCR AASXQ AAXUO ABASU ABCQX ABDIG ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ABOCM ABPPZ ABVCZ ABWVN ACGFS ACIJW ACILI ACLDA ACOAL ACRPL ACXJB ADGGA ADHPY ADMUD ADNKB ADNMO ADPAM ADZCM AEBDS AEETU AENEX AFDTB AFEXH AFFNX AFTRI AFUWQ AGHFR AHOMT AHQNM AHRYX AHVBC AI. AINUH AITUG AIZYK AJCLO AJIOK AJNWD AJZMW AKCTQ AKULP ALKUP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALMTX AMJPA AMKUR AMNEI AMRAJ ASGHL ASPBG AVWKF AZFZN BCGUY BELOY BYPQX C45 C5W CS3 DIWNM DU5 EBS EEVPB EJD ERAAH EX3 F5P FCALG FDB FEDTE FGOYB GBLVA GNXGY GQDEL HLJTE HVGLF HZ~ H~9 IH2 IHE IKREB IKYAY IPNFZ J5H KMI L7B M41 MJL MO0 N4W NQ- NTWIH O9- OAG OAH OB3 OBH ODMTH OGROG OHH OL1 OVD OWU OWV OWW OWY OWZ P2P PKN QTD R2- RIG RLZ ROL RPZ SEL SES SJN SSZ TEORI TSPGW UDS UNMZH UV1 VH1 VVN WOW X7M XH2 XYM YFH YOC ZCG ZFV ZGI ZXP ZY1 ZZMQN AGZHU AHPSJ ALXNB ZA5 AAYXX ABPXF ABXYN ABZZY ACVFH ACZKN ADCNI ADGHP AFBFQ AFNMH AGQPQ AHQVU AIGII AOQMC CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 ADKSD ADSXY |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-b80d34025ca21512186e8ecffdf395820a1dd463e521be4ed6cadb9e3c2a2f7a3 |
ISSN | 0022-5347 1527-3792 |
IngestDate | Sun Sep 28 08:16:11 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:03:07 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:58:11 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:29:40 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:26:30 EST 2024 Tue Feb 25 20:08:43 EST 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 6 |
Keywords | robotic surgical procedures ureter radionuclide cystogram RNC replantation minimally invasive surgical procedures UTI vesico-ureteral reflux VUR voiding cystourethrogram vesicoureteral reflux VCUG robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation RALUR-EV urinary tract infection |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2017 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c477t-b80d34025ca21512186e8ecffdf395820a1dd463e521be4ed6cadb9e3c2a2f7a3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 28130103 |
PQID | 1862760386 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 7 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1862760386 pubmed_primary_28130103 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2017_01_062 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_juro_2017_01_062 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_juro_2017_01_062 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0022534717300885 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2017-06-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-06-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2017 text: 2017-06-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | The Journal of urology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Urol |
PublicationYear | 2017 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
References | Grimsby, Dwyer, Jacobs (bib10) 2015; 193 Gundeti, Boysen, Shah (bib7) 2016; 70 Wicher, Hadley, Ludlow (bib11) 2010; 184 Tasian, Wiebe, Casale (bib27) 2013; 190 Routh, Bogaert, Kaefer (bib1) 2012; 61 Peters, Skoog, Arant (bib15) 2010; 184 Kasturi, Sehgal, Christman (bib9) 2012; 79 Arlen, Broderick, Travers (bib25) 2016; 12 Akhavan, Avery, Lendvay (bib17) 2014; 10 Chen, Lin, Lai (bib3) 2002; 167 Wang, Tejwani, Cannon (bib13) 2016; 12 Lakshmanan, Fung (bib6) 2000; 14 Barbosa, Barayan, Gridley (bib22) 2013; 190 Atala, Kavoussi, Goldstein (bib5) 1993; 150 Elder, Peters, Arant (bib23) 1997; 157 Harel, Herbst, Silvis (bib19) 2015; 11 Smith, Oliver, Peters (bib12) 2011; 185 Schomburg, Haberman, Willihnganz-Lawson (bib24) 2014; 10 Kaye, Srinivasan, Delaney (bib4) 2012; 8 Cook, McCulloch, Blazeby (bib28) 2013; 346 Harris, Taylor, Thielke (bib14) 2009; 42 Chalmers, Herbst, Kim (bib18) 2012; 8 Gregoir (bib2) 1977 Dindo, Demartines, Clavien (bib16) 2004; 240 Marchini, Hong, Minnillo (bib20) 2011; 185 Garcia-Roig, Travers, McCracken (bib21) 2017; 197 Bowen, Faasse, Liu (bib8) 2016; 196 Herrell, Smith (bib26) 2005; 66 Kaye (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib4) 2012; 8 Wang (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib13) 2016; 12 Akhavan (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib17) 2014; 10 Wicher (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib11) 2010; 184 Chen (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib3) 2002; 167 Barbosa (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib22) 2013; 190 Harel (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib19) 2015; 11 Smith (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib12) 2011; 185 Herrell (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib26) 2005; 66 Lakshmanan (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib6) 2000; 14 Garcia-Roig (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib21) 2017; 197 Atala (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib5) 1993; 150 Gregoir (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib2) 1977 Marchini (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib20) 2011; 185 Routh (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib1) 2012; 61 Grimsby (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib10) 2015; 193 Harris (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib14) 2009; 42 Kasturi (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib9) 2012; 79 Gundeti (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib7) 2016; 70 Arlen (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib25) 2016; 12 Cook (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib28) 2013; 346 Dindo (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib16) 2004; 240 Peters (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib15) 2010; 184 Elder (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib23) 1997; 157 Bowen (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib8) 2016; 196 Tasian (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib27) 2013; 190 Chalmers (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib18) 2012; 8 Schomburg (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib24) 2014; 10 28259760 - J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1561 30086580 - Aktuelle Urol. 2018 Aug;49(4):298-300 28325668 - J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1379-1381 28259759 - J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1560-1561 |
References_xml | – volume: 61 start-page: 773 year: 2012 ident: bib1 article-title: Vesicoureteral reflux: current trends in diagnosis, screening, and treatment publication-title: Eur Urol – volume: 10 start-page: 875 year: 2014 ident: bib24 article-title: Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation: a single surgeon comparison to open surgery publication-title: J Pediatr Urol – volume: 346 start-page: f2820 year: 2013 ident: bib28 article-title: IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 3: randomised controlled trials in the assessment stage and evaluations in the long term study stage publication-title: BMJ – volume: 190 start-page: 244 year: 2013 ident: bib22 article-title: Parent and patient perceptions of robotic vs open urological surgery scars in children publication-title: J Urol – volume: 150 start-page: 748 year: 1993 ident: bib5 article-title: Laparoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux publication-title: J Urol – volume: 197 start-page: 911 year: 2017 ident: bib21 article-title: Surgical scar location preference for pediatric kidney and pelvic surgery: a crowdsourced survey publication-title: J Urol – volume: 184 start-page: 1134 year: 2010 ident: bib15 article-title: Summary of the AUA guideline on management of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children publication-title: J Urol – volume: 12 start-page: 169.e1 year: 2016 ident: bib25 article-title: Outcomes of complex robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation in the pediatric population publication-title: J Pediatr Urol – volume: 79 start-page: 680 year: 2012 ident: bib9 article-title: Prospective long-term analysis of nerve-sparing extravesical robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation publication-title: Urology – volume: 190 start-page: 1622 year: 2013 ident: bib27 article-title: Learning curve of robotic assisted pyeloplasty for pediatric urology fellows publication-title: J Urol – volume: 193 start-page: 1791 year: 2015 ident: bib10 article-title: Multi-institutional review of outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation publication-title: J Urol – volume: 8 start-page: 297 year: 2012 ident: bib4 article-title: Clinical and radiographic results of endoscopic injection for vesicoureteral reflux: defining measures of success publication-title: J Pediatr Urol – volume: 10 start-page: 864 year: 2014 ident: bib17 article-title: Robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation: outcomes and conclusions from 78 ureters publication-title: J Pediatr Urol – start-page: 265 year: 1977 ident: bib2 article-title: Lich-Gregoir operation publication-title: Surgical Pediatric Urology – volume: 167 start-page: 1821 year: 2002 ident: bib3 article-title: Minimally invasive extravesical ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux publication-title: J Urol – volume: 157 start-page: 1846 year: 1997 ident: bib23 article-title: Pediatric Vesicoureteral Reflux Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children publication-title: J Urol – volume: 196 start-page: 207 year: 2016 ident: bib8 article-title: Use of pediatric open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in the United States: 2000 to 2012 publication-title: J Urol – volume: 184 start-page: 311 year: 2010 ident: bib11 article-title: 250 Consecutive unilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantations in an outpatient setting publication-title: J Urol – volume: 11 start-page: 82.e1 year: 2015 ident: bib19 article-title: Objective pain assessment after ureteral reimplantation: comparison of open versus robotic approach publication-title: J Pediatr Urol – volume: 185 start-page: 1870 year: 2011 ident: bib20 article-title: Robotic assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in children: case matched comparative study with open surgical approach publication-title: J Urol – volume: 240 start-page: 205 year: 2004 ident: bib16 article-title: Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 185 start-page: 1876 year: 2011 ident: bib12 article-title: Pediatric robotic extravesical ureteral reimplantation: comparison with open surgery publication-title: J Urol – volume: 8 start-page: 268 year: 2012 ident: bib18 article-title: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation: an initial experience publication-title: J Pediatr Urol – volume: 66 start-page: 105 year: 2005 ident: bib26 article-title: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve? publication-title: Urology – volume: 14 start-page: 589 year: 2000 ident: bib6 article-title: Laparoscopic extravesicular ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux: recent technical advances publication-title: J Endourol – volume: 70 start-page: 818 year: 2016 ident: bib7 article-title: Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation: technique modifications contribute to optimized outcomes publication-title: Eur Urol – volume: 42 start-page: 377 year: 2009 ident: bib14 article-title: Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support publication-title: J Biomed Inform – volume: 12 start-page: 232.e1 year: 2016 ident: bib13 article-title: Open versus minimally invasive ureteroneocystostomy: a population-level analysis publication-title: J Pediatr Urol – volume: 184 start-page: 1134 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib15 article-title: Summary of the AUA guideline on management of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.05.065 – start-page: 265 year: 1977 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib2 article-title: Lich-Gregoir operation – volume: 8 start-page: 268 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib18 article-title: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation: an initial experience publication-title: J Pediatr Urol doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.04.006 – volume: 14 start-page: 589 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib6 article-title: Laparoscopic extravesicular ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux: recent technical advances publication-title: J Endourol doi: 10.1089/08927790050152203 – volume: 167 start-page: 1821 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib3 article-title: Minimally invasive extravesical ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65240-8 – volume: 61 start-page: 773 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib1 article-title: Vesicoureteral reflux: current trends in diagnosis, screening, and treatment publication-title: Eur Urol doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.002 – volume: 185 start-page: 1876 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib12 article-title: Pediatric robotic extravesical ureteral reimplantation: comparison with open surgery publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.072 – volume: 10 start-page: 864 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib17 article-title: Robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation: outcomes and conclusions from 78 ureters publication-title: J Pediatr Urol doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.01.028 – volume: 8 start-page: 297 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib4 article-title: Clinical and radiographic results of endoscopic injection for vesicoureteral reflux: defining measures of success publication-title: J Pediatr Urol doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.02.006 – volume: 184 start-page: 311 year: 2010 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib11 article-title: 250 Consecutive unilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantations in an outpatient setting publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.056 – volume: 150 start-page: 748 year: 1993 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib5 article-title: Laparoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35604-5 – volume: 11 start-page: 82.e1 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib19 article-title: Objective pain assessment after ureteral reimplantation: comparison of open versus robotic approach publication-title: J Pediatr Urol doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.12.007 – volume: 190 start-page: 1622 issue: suppl. year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib27 article-title: Learning curve of robotic assisted pyeloplasty for pediatric urology fellows publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.009 – volume: 10 start-page: 875 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib24 article-title: Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation: a single surgeon comparison to open surgery publication-title: J Pediatr Urol doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.02.013 – volume: 197 start-page: 911 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib21 article-title: Surgical scar location preference for pediatric kidney and pelvic surgery: a crowdsourced survey publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.11.033 – volume: 193 start-page: 1791 issue: suppl. year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib10 article-title: Multi-institutional review of outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.128 – volume: 240 start-page: 205 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib16 article-title: Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae – volume: 346 start-page: f2820 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib28 article-title: IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 3: randomised controlled trials in the assessment stage and evaluations in the long term study stage publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2820 – volume: 157 start-page: 1846 year: 1997 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib23 article-title: Pediatric Vesicoureteral Reflux Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64882-1 – volume: 12 start-page: 169.e1 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib25 article-title: Outcomes of complex robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation in the pediatric population publication-title: J Pediatr Urol doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.11.007 – volume: 79 start-page: 680 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib9 article-title: Prospective long-term analysis of nerve-sparing extravesical robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.052 – volume: 12 start-page: 232.e1 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib13 article-title: Open versus minimally invasive ureteroneocystostomy: a population-level analysis publication-title: J Pediatr Urol doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.03.014 – volume: 185 start-page: 1870 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib20 article-title: Robotic assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in children: case matched comparative study with open surgical approach publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.069 – volume: 70 start-page: 818 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib7 article-title: Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation: technique modifications contribute to optimized outcomes publication-title: Eur Urol doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.065 – volume: 196 start-page: 207 year: 2016 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib8 article-title: Use of pediatric open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in the United States: 2000 to 2012 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.065 – volume: 190 start-page: 244 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib22 article-title: Parent and patient perceptions of robotic vs open urological surgery scars in children publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.060 – volume: 66 start-page: 105 issue: suppl. year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib26 article-title: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve? publication-title: Urology doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.084 – volume: 42 start-page: 377 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib14 article-title: Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support publication-title: J Biomed Inform doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 – reference: 28325668 - J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1379-1381 – reference: 28259760 - J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1561 – reference: 30086580 - Aktuelle Urol. 2018 Aug;49(4):298-300 – reference: 28259759 - J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1560-1561 |
SSID | ssj0014572 |
Score | 2.4474716 |
Snippet | Purpose Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to open ureteral reimplantation... Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to open ureteral reimplantation for... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 1555 |
SubjectTerms | Child Female Humans Laparoscopy - adverse effects Laparoscopy - methods Male minimally invasive surgical procedures Postoperative Complications - etiology replantation Replantation - methods Retrospective Studies robotic surgical procedures Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Treatment Outcome ureter Ureter - surgery Urologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods Urology vesico-ureteral reflux Vesico-Ureteral Reflux - surgery |
Title | Multi-Institutional Review of Outcomes and Complications of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation for Treatment of Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0022534717300885 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28130103 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1862760386 |
Volume | 197 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1da9swFBVZCmMvY9_LvtBgb8HBtmRbeWxLujLSFkZS8iZkS4aGYpfEhm5_bK_7abuyJMceaen2YoISSTbnRDqWzr1C6EvClPQFEfBaIolHM3hhZWzqe8pPaZSnQZjFOnb47Dw-XdJvq2g1GPzuuJbqKp1kP_fGlfwPqlAGuOoo2X9Atm0UCuAz4AtXQBiuD8K4iZ713H6_WdT73saiXNQVdKpMEubjnnVcZyAp07LyAB2NsxzPYdLUiS3Lm6tsPLut9KlEBsDlRjtmmpavoA1RdPyJi9amrq10NnHFpa4It99Wy6_r2ya60AaOdwXxLjStEcX1prfMf1T-sCtEdl1o52_UZhMbLeZ2AHbLuPaMaJM5wR4QbgN8THmTH8Juidk1jyDZebPcMB3qodGcojdRe8rc2G7Mv5bE3ZEadFS0dwoxqxnryRqeWFv_kiatq50yevm6zy_4yXI-54vZavEIHYQJqLchOvh6NL88bHeyaNQcINbenQ3cMh7Dv_u4Sxzd9fLTiKDFM_TUAoUPDRWfo4EqXqDHZ9af8RL92sNIbBiJyxw7RmJgJO4xUn_bZyTuMhJ3GYkdI3GfkRgYiVtG6hYtI3GfkdgwEl8V2DHyFVqezBbHp549GsTLaJJUXsp8SSjo9Uw0mjVgsWIqy3OZk2kEqlYEUtKYKFCnqaJKxpmQ6VSRLBRhngjyGg2LslBvEQ4Iy0MZU-H7OVUsEKnevFYwVMmIkVyMUOAw4ZnNm6-Pb7nmziC55hpHrnHkfsABxxEat3VuzKPe--vEQc1dPDTM4Gprh5otD_g25D7XzoowIlQ7Z0C7s2iEoramVcxGCXNg8709fnaM4jCd6D1CUaiyhp5YDDz2CYtH6I2hWvsEIQPBG_jk3QNqv0dPdn_cD2hYbWr1EeR7lX6y_5A_FKv8Tw |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-Institutional+Review+of+Outcomes+and+Complications+of+Robot-Assisted+Laparoscopic+Extravesical+Ureteral+Reimplantation+for+Treatment+of+Primary+Vesicoureteral+Reflux+in+Children&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+urology&rft.au=Boysen%2C+William+R&rft.au=Ellison%2C+Jonathan+S&rft.au=Kim%2C+Christina&rft.au=Koh%2C+Chester+J&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.issn=1527-3792&rft.eissn=1527-3792&rft.volume=197&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1555&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.juro.2017.01.062&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00225347%2FS0022534716X00183%2Fcov150h.gif |