Multi-Institutional Review of Outcomes and Complications of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation for Treatment of Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children

Purpose Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to open ureteral reimplantation for correcting primary vesicoureteral reflux in children. However, in the current literature there are conflicting data regarding the safety...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of urology Vol. 197; no. 6; pp. 1555 - 1561
Main Authors Boysen, William R, Ellison, Jonathan S, Kim, Christina, Koh, Chester J, Noh, Paul, Whittam, Benjamin, Palmer, Blake, Shukla, Aseem, Kirsch, Andrew, Gundeti, Mohan S
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.06.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0022-5347
1527-3792
1527-3792
DOI10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062

Cover

Abstract Purpose Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to open ureteral reimplantation for correcting primary vesicoureteral reflux in children. However, in the current literature there are conflicting data regarding the safety and efficacy of this approach. Amid ongoing debate we analyzed outcomes and complications from this procedure in a large multi-institutional cohort. Materials and Methods We reviewed the records of children who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation at 9 academic centers from 2005 to 2014. Radiographic failure was defined as persistent vesicoureteral reflux on postoperative voiding cystourethrogram or radionuclide cystogram. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo scale. Results A total of 260 patients (363 ureters) underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux during the study period. The cohort included 90 patients with either duplex ureter (42), failed endoscopic treatment (40) or concomitant diverticulectomy (8). Of the 280 ureters with postoperative voiding cystourethrogram or radionuclide cystogram available radiographic resolution was seen in 246 (87.9%). There were 25 complications overall (9.6%), with 7 grade 3 complications (2.7%) and no grade 4 or 5 complications. Four patients (3.9%) had transient urinary retention following bilateral reimplantation. Conclusions Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has a low complication rate consistent with published series of open ureteral reimplantation. Radiographic success rates are approaching those of the open procedure but continue to fall short of the gold standard approach. These findings necessitate critical thinking regarding potential technique improvements and further prospective investigation into the efficacy of this procedure.
AbstractList Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to open ureteral reimplantation for correcting primary vesicoureteral reflux in children. However, in the current literature there are conflicting data regarding the safety and efficacy of this approach. Amid ongoing debate we analyzed outcomes and complications from this procedure in a large multi-institutional cohort.PURPOSERobot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to open ureteral reimplantation for correcting primary vesicoureteral reflux in children. However, in the current literature there are conflicting data regarding the safety and efficacy of this approach. Amid ongoing debate we analyzed outcomes and complications from this procedure in a large multi-institutional cohort.We reviewed the records of children who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation at 9 academic centers from 2005 to 2014. Radiographic failure was defined as persistent vesicoureteral reflux on postoperative voiding cystourethrogram or radionuclide cystogram. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo scale.MATERIALS AND METHODSWe reviewed the records of children who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation at 9 academic centers from 2005 to 2014. Radiographic failure was defined as persistent vesicoureteral reflux on postoperative voiding cystourethrogram or radionuclide cystogram. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo scale.A total of 260 patients (363 ureters) underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux during the study period. The cohort included 90 patients with either duplex ureter (42), failed endoscopic treatment (40) or concomitant diverticulectomy (8). Of the 280 ureters with postoperative voiding cystourethrogram or radionuclide cystogram available radiographic resolution was seen in 246 (87.9%). There were 25 complications overall (9.6%), with 7 grade 3 complications (2.7%) and no grade 4 or 5 complications. Four patients (3.9%) had transient urinary retention following bilateral reimplantation.RESULTSA total of 260 patients (363 ureters) underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux during the study period. The cohort included 90 patients with either duplex ureter (42), failed endoscopic treatment (40) or concomitant diverticulectomy (8). Of the 280 ureters with postoperative voiding cystourethrogram or radionuclide cystogram available radiographic resolution was seen in 246 (87.9%). There were 25 complications overall (9.6%), with 7 grade 3 complications (2.7%) and no grade 4 or 5 complications. Four patients (3.9%) had transient urinary retention following bilateral reimplantation.Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has a low complication rate consistent with published series of open ureteral reimplantation. Radiographic success rates are approaching those of the open procedure but continue to fall short of the gold standard approach. These findings necessitate critical thinking regarding potential technique improvements and further prospective investigation into the efficacy of this procedure.CONCLUSIONSRobot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has a low complication rate consistent with published series of open ureteral reimplantation. Radiographic success rates are approaching those of the open procedure but continue to fall short of the gold standard approach. These findings necessitate critical thinking regarding potential technique improvements and further prospective investigation into the efficacy of this procedure.
Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to open ureteral reimplantation for correcting primary vesicoureteral reflux in children. However, in the current literature there are conflicting data regarding the safety and efficacy of this approach. Amid ongoing debate we analyzed outcomes and complications from this procedure in a large multi-institutional cohort. We reviewed the records of children who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation at 9 academic centers from 2005 to 2014. Radiographic failure was defined as persistent vesicoureteral reflux on postoperative voiding cystourethrogram or radionuclide cystogram. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo scale. A total of 260 patients (363 ureters) underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux during the study period. The cohort included 90 patients with either duplex ureter (42), failed endoscopic treatment (40) or concomitant diverticulectomy (8). Of the 280 ureters with postoperative voiding cystourethrogram or radionuclide cystogram available radiographic resolution was seen in 246 (87.9%). There were 25 complications overall (9.6%), with 7 grade 3 complications (2.7%) and no grade 4 or 5 complications. Four patients (3.9%) had transient urinary retention following bilateral reimplantation. Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has a low complication rate consistent with published series of open ureteral reimplantation. Radiographic success rates are approaching those of the open procedure but continue to fall short of the gold standard approach. These findings necessitate critical thinking regarding potential technique improvements and further prospective investigation into the efficacy of this procedure.
Purpose Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to open ureteral reimplantation for correcting primary vesicoureteral reflux in children. However, in the current literature there are conflicting data regarding the safety and efficacy of this approach. Amid ongoing debate we analyzed outcomes and complications from this procedure in a large multi-institutional cohort. Materials and Methods We reviewed the records of children who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation at 9 academic centers from 2005 to 2014. Radiographic failure was defined as persistent vesicoureteral reflux on postoperative voiding cystourethrogram or radionuclide cystogram. Complications were graded using the Clavien-Dindo scale. Results A total of 260 patients (363 ureters) underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux during the study period. The cohort included 90 patients with either duplex ureter (42), failed endoscopic treatment (40) or concomitant diverticulectomy (8). Of the 280 ureters with postoperative voiding cystourethrogram or radionuclide cystogram available radiographic resolution was seen in 246 (87.9%). There were 25 complications overall (9.6%), with 7 grade 3 complications (2.7%) and no grade 4 or 5 complications. Four patients (3.9%) had transient urinary retention following bilateral reimplantation. Conclusions Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has a low complication rate consistent with published series of open ureteral reimplantation. Radiographic success rates are approaching those of the open procedure but continue to fall short of the gold standard approach. These findings necessitate critical thinking regarding potential technique improvements and further prospective investigation into the efficacy of this procedure.
Author Noh, Paul
Shukla, Aseem
Boysen, William R
Kirsch, Andrew
Ellison, Jonathan S
Kim, Christina
Palmer, Blake
Koh, Chester J
Whittam, Benjamin
Gundeti, Mohan S
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Boysen, William R
– sequence: 2
  fullname: Ellison, Jonathan S
– sequence: 3
  fullname: Kim, Christina
– sequence: 4
  fullname: Koh, Chester J
– sequence: 5
  fullname: Noh, Paul
– sequence: 6
  fullname: Whittam, Benjamin
– sequence: 7
  fullname: Palmer, Blake
– sequence: 8
  fullname: Shukla, Aseem
– sequence: 9
  fullname: Kirsch, Andrew
– sequence: 10
  fullname: Gundeti, Mohan S
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28130103$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kstu1TAYhC1URE8LL8ACeckmwZfcjoSQqqMClQ4qKi1by7H_CIfEDrbTy5PxejhNAamLrrzwfCP9M3OEDqyzgNBrSnJKaPWuz_vZu5wRWueE5qRiz9CGlqzOeL1lB2hDCGNZyYv6EB2F0BNCi7JmL9AhaygnlPAN-v1lHqLJzmyIJs7ROCsHfAHXBm6w6_D5HJUbIWBpNd65cRqMkosqLL8XrnUxOwnBhAga7-UkvQvKTUbh09vo5TWEpB_wlYcI_t7ZJA9p470J7pzHlx5kHMHGxfGrN6P0d_j7Arr5P9YN8y02Fu9-mEF7sC_R804OAV49vMfo6uPp5e5ztj__dLY72WeqqOuYtQ3RvCCsVJLRkjLaVNCA6jrd8W3ZMCKp1kXFoWS0hQJ0paRut8AVk6yrJT9Gb1ffybtfM4QoRhMUDOkGcHMQyZDVFeFNlaRvHqRzO4IW03qL-Bt2ErBVoFJKwUP3T0KJWBoVvVgaFUujglCRGk1Q8whSZk0v5WuGp9H3KwopoNSoF0EZsAq08aCi0M48jX94hKvB2KXPn3AHoU_1pLGkCERggohvy9qWsdGaE9I0Jf8DupnWkA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2024_10_030
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11884_022_00658_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2019_07_024
crossref_primary_10_3165_jjpn_rv_2018_0004
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2019_0619
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2021_06_043
crossref_primary_10_1089_vid_2018_0008
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00383_024_05908_5
crossref_primary_10_1111_ases_12653
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1905_4636
crossref_primary_10_3389_fped_2019_00187
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpedsurg_2022_07_002
crossref_primary_10_4103_iju_iju_276_22
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00383_020_04749_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2018_02_018
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2018_04_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2017_03_095
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2022_10_024
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sempedsurg_2021_151082
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2018_01_020
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40137_023_00375_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sempedsurg_2021_151086
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolvj_2019_100021
crossref_primary_10_17116_endoskop20243001160
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2020_03_005
crossref_primary_10_1590_s1677_5538_ibju_2020_99_03
crossref_primary_10_1590_s1677_5538_ibju_2020_99_05
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_019_02753_3
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00383_024_05948_x
crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0043_1764321
crossref_primary_10_3389_fped_2019_00085
crossref_primary_10_3389_fped_2023_1120831
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2020_0158
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_023_01523_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urology_2024_10_063
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euf_2017_08_012
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11701_022_01437_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11934_018_0794_z
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm11051327
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2017_03_112
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2018_08_012
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_radcr_2024_08_113
crossref_primary_10_3346_jkms_2018_33_e240
crossref_primary_10_1089_end_2018_29045_vid
crossref_primary_10_3389_fped_2022_935082
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40746_024_00300_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpurol_2023_07_013
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_019_02766_y
crossref_primary_10_3389_fped_2019_00093
crossref_primary_10_1089_lap_2018_0745
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.juro.2010.05.065
10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.04.006
10.1089/08927790050152203
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65240-8
10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.002
10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.072
10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.01.028
10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.02.006
10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.056
10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35604-5
10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.12.007
10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.009
10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.02.013
10.1016/j.juro.2016.11.033
10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.128
10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
10.1136/bmj.f2820
10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64882-1
10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.11.007
10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.052
10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.03.014
10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.069
10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.065
10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.065
10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.060
10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.084
10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.
2017 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.
Copyright © 2017 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.
– notice: 2017 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.
– notice: Copyright © 2017 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1527-3792
EndPage 1561
ExternalDocumentID 28130103
10_1016_j_juro_2017_01_062
S0022534717300885
1_s2_0_S0022534717300885
Genre Multicenter Study
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
.55
.GJ
.XZ
08P
0R~
123
1B1
1CY
354
3O-
4.4
457
4G.
4Q1
4Q2
4Q3
53G
5RE
5VS
7-5
AAAAV
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAGIX
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AAJCS
AAKAS
AALRI
AAMOA
AAQFI
AAQKA
AAQQT
AAQXK
AASCR
AASXQ
AAXUO
ABASU
ABCQX
ABDIG
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABOCM
ABPPZ
ABVCZ
ABWVN
ACGFS
ACIJW
ACILI
ACLDA
ACOAL
ACRPL
ACXJB
ADGGA
ADHPY
ADMUD
ADNKB
ADNMO
ADPAM
ADZCM
AEBDS
AEETU
AENEX
AFDTB
AFEXH
AFFNX
AFTRI
AFUWQ
AGHFR
AHOMT
AHQNM
AHRYX
AHVBC
AI.
AINUH
AITUG
AIZYK
AJCLO
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJZMW
AKCTQ
AKULP
ALKUP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALMTX
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AMRAJ
ASGHL
ASPBG
AVWKF
AZFZN
BCGUY
BELOY
BYPQX
C45
C5W
CS3
DIWNM
DU5
EBS
EEVPB
EJD
ERAAH
EX3
F5P
FCALG
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
GBLVA
GNXGY
GQDEL
HLJTE
HVGLF
HZ~
H~9
IH2
IHE
IKREB
IKYAY
IPNFZ
J5H
KMI
L7B
M41
MJL
MO0
N4W
NQ-
NTWIH
O9-
OAG
OAH
OB3
OBH
ODMTH
OGROG
OHH
OL1
OVD
OWU
OWV
OWW
OWY
OWZ
P2P
PKN
QTD
R2-
RIG
RLZ
ROL
RPZ
SEL
SES
SJN
SSZ
TEORI
TSPGW
UDS
UNMZH
UV1
VH1
VVN
WOW
X7M
XH2
XYM
YFH
YOC
ZCG
ZFV
ZGI
ZXP
ZY1
ZZMQN
AGZHU
AHPSJ
ALXNB
ZA5
AAYXX
ABPXF
ABXYN
ABZZY
ACVFH
ACZKN
ADCNI
ADGHP
AFBFQ
AFNMH
AGQPQ
AHQVU
AIGII
AOQMC
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ADKSD
ADSXY
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-b80d34025ca21512186e8ecffdf395820a1dd463e521be4ed6cadb9e3c2a2f7a3
ISSN 0022-5347
1527-3792
IngestDate Sun Sep 28 08:16:11 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:03:07 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:58:11 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:29:40 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:26:30 EST 2024
Tue Feb 25 20:08:43 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 6
Keywords robotic surgical procedures
ureter
radionuclide cystogram
RNC
replantation
minimally invasive surgical procedures
UTI
vesico-ureteral reflux
VUR
voiding cystourethrogram
vesicoureteral reflux
VCUG
robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation
RALUR-EV
urinary tract infection
Language English
License Copyright © 2017 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c477t-b80d34025ca21512186e8ecffdf395820a1dd463e521be4ed6cadb9e3c2a2f7a3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 28130103
PQID 1862760386
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1862760386
pubmed_primary_28130103
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_juro_2017_01_062
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_juro_2017_01_062
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_juro_2017_01_062
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0022534717300885
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-06-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-06-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle The Journal of urology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Urol
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Grimsby, Dwyer, Jacobs (bib10) 2015; 193
Gundeti, Boysen, Shah (bib7) 2016; 70
Wicher, Hadley, Ludlow (bib11) 2010; 184
Tasian, Wiebe, Casale (bib27) 2013; 190
Routh, Bogaert, Kaefer (bib1) 2012; 61
Peters, Skoog, Arant (bib15) 2010; 184
Kasturi, Sehgal, Christman (bib9) 2012; 79
Arlen, Broderick, Travers (bib25) 2016; 12
Akhavan, Avery, Lendvay (bib17) 2014; 10
Chen, Lin, Lai (bib3) 2002; 167
Wang, Tejwani, Cannon (bib13) 2016; 12
Lakshmanan, Fung (bib6) 2000; 14
Barbosa, Barayan, Gridley (bib22) 2013; 190
Atala, Kavoussi, Goldstein (bib5) 1993; 150
Elder, Peters, Arant (bib23) 1997; 157
Harel, Herbst, Silvis (bib19) 2015; 11
Smith, Oliver, Peters (bib12) 2011; 185
Schomburg, Haberman, Willihnganz-Lawson (bib24) 2014; 10
Kaye, Srinivasan, Delaney (bib4) 2012; 8
Cook, McCulloch, Blazeby (bib28) 2013; 346
Harris, Taylor, Thielke (bib14) 2009; 42
Chalmers, Herbst, Kim (bib18) 2012; 8
Gregoir (bib2) 1977
Dindo, Demartines, Clavien (bib16) 2004; 240
Marchini, Hong, Minnillo (bib20) 2011; 185
Garcia-Roig, Travers, McCracken (bib21) 2017; 197
Bowen, Faasse, Liu (bib8) 2016; 196
Herrell, Smith (bib26) 2005; 66
Kaye (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib4) 2012; 8
Wang (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib13) 2016; 12
Akhavan (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib17) 2014; 10
Wicher (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib11) 2010; 184
Chen (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib3) 2002; 167
Barbosa (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib22) 2013; 190
Harel (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib19) 2015; 11
Smith (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib12) 2011; 185
Herrell (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib26) 2005; 66
Lakshmanan (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib6) 2000; 14
Garcia-Roig (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib21) 2017; 197
Atala (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib5) 1993; 150
Gregoir (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib2) 1977
Marchini (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib20) 2011; 185
Routh (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib1) 2012; 61
Grimsby (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib10) 2015; 193
Harris (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib14) 2009; 42
Kasturi (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib9) 2012; 79
Gundeti (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib7) 2016; 70
Arlen (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib25) 2016; 12
Cook (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib28) 2013; 346
Dindo (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib16) 2004; 240
Peters (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib15) 2010; 184
Elder (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib23) 1997; 157
Bowen (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib8) 2016; 196
Tasian (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib27) 2013; 190
Chalmers (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib18) 2012; 8
Schomburg (10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib24) 2014; 10
28259760 - J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1561
30086580 - Aktuelle Urol. 2018 Aug;49(4):298-300
28325668 - J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1379-1381
28259759 - J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1560-1561
References_xml – volume: 61
  start-page: 773
  year: 2012
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Vesicoureteral reflux: current trends in diagnosis, screening, and treatment
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 10
  start-page: 875
  year: 2014
  ident: bib24
  article-title: Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation: a single surgeon comparison to open surgery
  publication-title: J Pediatr Urol
– volume: 346
  start-page: f2820
  year: 2013
  ident: bib28
  article-title: IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 3: randomised controlled trials in the assessment stage and evaluations in the long term study stage
  publication-title: BMJ
– volume: 190
  start-page: 244
  year: 2013
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Parent and patient perceptions of robotic vs open urological surgery scars in children
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 150
  start-page: 748
  year: 1993
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Laparoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 197
  start-page: 911
  year: 2017
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Surgical scar location preference for pediatric kidney and pelvic surgery: a crowdsourced survey
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 184
  start-page: 1134
  year: 2010
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Summary of the AUA guideline on management of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 12
  start-page: 169.e1
  year: 2016
  ident: bib25
  article-title: Outcomes of complex robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation in the pediatric population
  publication-title: J Pediatr Urol
– volume: 79
  start-page: 680
  year: 2012
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Prospective long-term analysis of nerve-sparing extravesical robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation
  publication-title: Urology
– volume: 190
  start-page: 1622
  year: 2013
  ident: bib27
  article-title: Learning curve of robotic assisted pyeloplasty for pediatric urology fellows
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 193
  start-page: 1791
  year: 2015
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Multi-institutional review of outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 8
  start-page: 297
  year: 2012
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Clinical and radiographic results of endoscopic injection for vesicoureteral reflux: defining measures of success
  publication-title: J Pediatr Urol
– volume: 10
  start-page: 864
  year: 2014
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation: outcomes and conclusions from 78 ureters
  publication-title: J Pediatr Urol
– start-page: 265
  year: 1977
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Lich-Gregoir operation
  publication-title: Surgical Pediatric Urology
– volume: 167
  start-page: 1821
  year: 2002
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Minimally invasive extravesical ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 157
  start-page: 1846
  year: 1997
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Pediatric Vesicoureteral Reflux Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 196
  start-page: 207
  year: 2016
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Use of pediatric open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in the United States: 2000 to 2012
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 184
  start-page: 311
  year: 2010
  ident: bib11
  article-title: 250 Consecutive unilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantations in an outpatient setting
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 11
  start-page: 82.e1
  year: 2015
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Objective pain assessment after ureteral reimplantation: comparison of open versus robotic approach
  publication-title: J Pediatr Urol
– volume: 185
  start-page: 1870
  year: 2011
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Robotic assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in children: case matched comparative study with open surgical approach
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 240
  start-page: 205
  year: 2004
  ident: bib16
  article-title: Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey
  publication-title: Ann Surg
– volume: 185
  start-page: 1876
  year: 2011
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Pediatric robotic extravesical ureteral reimplantation: comparison with open surgery
  publication-title: J Urol
– volume: 8
  start-page: 268
  year: 2012
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation: an initial experience
  publication-title: J Pediatr Urol
– volume: 66
  start-page: 105
  year: 2005
  ident: bib26
  article-title: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve?
  publication-title: Urology
– volume: 14
  start-page: 589
  year: 2000
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Laparoscopic extravesicular ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux: recent technical advances
  publication-title: J Endourol
– volume: 70
  start-page: 818
  year: 2016
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation: technique modifications contribute to optimized outcomes
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 42
  start-page: 377
  year: 2009
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support
  publication-title: J Biomed Inform
– volume: 12
  start-page: 232.e1
  year: 2016
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Open versus minimally invasive ureteroneocystostomy: a population-level analysis
  publication-title: J Pediatr Urol
– volume: 184
  start-page: 1134
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib15
  article-title: Summary of the AUA guideline on management of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.05.065
– start-page: 265
  year: 1977
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib2
  article-title: Lich-Gregoir operation
– volume: 8
  start-page: 268
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib18
  article-title: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation: an initial experience
  publication-title: J Pediatr Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.04.006
– volume: 14
  start-page: 589
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib6
  article-title: Laparoscopic extravesicular ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux: recent technical advances
  publication-title: J Endourol
  doi: 10.1089/08927790050152203
– volume: 167
  start-page: 1821
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib3
  article-title: Minimally invasive extravesical ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65240-8
– volume: 61
  start-page: 773
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib1
  article-title: Vesicoureteral reflux: current trends in diagnosis, screening, and treatment
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.002
– volume: 185
  start-page: 1876
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib12
  article-title: Pediatric robotic extravesical ureteral reimplantation: comparison with open surgery
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.072
– volume: 10
  start-page: 864
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib17
  article-title: Robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation: outcomes and conclusions from 78 ureters
  publication-title: J Pediatr Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.01.028
– volume: 8
  start-page: 297
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib4
  article-title: Clinical and radiographic results of endoscopic injection for vesicoureteral reflux: defining measures of success
  publication-title: J Pediatr Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.02.006
– volume: 184
  start-page: 311
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib11
  article-title: 250 Consecutive unilateral extravesical ureteral reimplantations in an outpatient setting
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.056
– volume: 150
  start-page: 748
  year: 1993
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib5
  article-title: Laparoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35604-5
– volume: 11
  start-page: 82.e1
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib19
  article-title: Objective pain assessment after ureteral reimplantation: comparison of open versus robotic approach
  publication-title: J Pediatr Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.12.007
– volume: 190
  start-page: 1622
  issue: suppl.
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib27
  article-title: Learning curve of robotic assisted pyeloplasty for pediatric urology fellows
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.009
– volume: 10
  start-page: 875
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib24
  article-title: Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation: a single surgeon comparison to open surgery
  publication-title: J Pediatr Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.02.013
– volume: 197
  start-page: 911
  year: 2017
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib21
  article-title: Surgical scar location preference for pediatric kidney and pelvic surgery: a crowdsourced survey
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.11.033
– volume: 193
  start-page: 1791
  issue: suppl.
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib10
  article-title: Multi-institutional review of outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.128
– volume: 240
  start-page: 205
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib16
  article-title: Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
– volume: 346
  start-page: f2820
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib28
  article-title: IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 3: randomised controlled trials in the assessment stage and evaluations in the long term study stage
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2820
– volume: 157
  start-page: 1846
  year: 1997
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib23
  article-title: Pediatric Vesicoureteral Reflux Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of primary vesicoureteral reflux in children
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64882-1
– volume: 12
  start-page: 169.e1
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib25
  article-title: Outcomes of complex robot-assisted extravesical ureteral reimplantation in the pediatric population
  publication-title: J Pediatr Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.11.007
– volume: 79
  start-page: 680
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib9
  article-title: Prospective long-term analysis of nerve-sparing extravesical robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation
  publication-title: Urology
  doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.10.052
– volume: 12
  start-page: 232.e1
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib13
  article-title: Open versus minimally invasive ureteroneocystostomy: a population-level analysis
  publication-title: J Pediatr Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.03.014
– volume: 185
  start-page: 1870
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib20
  article-title: Robotic assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in children: case matched comparative study with open surgical approach
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.069
– volume: 70
  start-page: 818
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib7
  article-title: Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation: technique modifications contribute to optimized outcomes
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.065
– volume: 196
  start-page: 207
  year: 2016
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib8
  article-title: Use of pediatric open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in the United States: 2000 to 2012
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.065
– volume: 190
  start-page: 244
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib22
  article-title: Parent and patient perceptions of robotic vs open urological surgery scars in children
  publication-title: J Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.060
– volume: 66
  start-page: 105
  issue: suppl.
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib26
  article-title: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve?
  publication-title: Urology
  doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.084
– volume: 42
  start-page: 377
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062_bib14
  article-title: Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support
  publication-title: J Biomed Inform
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
– reference: 28325668 - J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1379-1381
– reference: 28259760 - J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1561
– reference: 30086580 - Aktuelle Urol. 2018 Aug;49(4):298-300
– reference: 28259759 - J Urol. 2017 Jun;197(6):1560-1561
SSID ssj0014572
Score 2.4474716
Snippet Purpose Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to open ureteral reimplantation...
Robot-assisted laparoscopic extravesical ureteral reimplantation has been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to open ureteral reimplantation for...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1555
SubjectTerms Child
Female
Humans
Laparoscopy - adverse effects
Laparoscopy - methods
Male
minimally invasive surgical procedures
Postoperative Complications - etiology
replantation
Replantation - methods
Retrospective Studies
robotic surgical procedures
Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Treatment Outcome
ureter
Ureter - surgery
Urologic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods
Urology
vesico-ureteral reflux
Vesico-Ureteral Reflux - surgery
Title Multi-Institutional Review of Outcomes and Complications of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation for Treatment of Primary Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children
URI https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0022534717300885
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.01.062
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28130103
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1862760386
Volume 197
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1da9swFBVZCmMvY9_LvtBgb8HBtmRbeWxLujLSFkZS8iZkS4aGYpfEhm5_bK_7abuyJMceaen2YoISSTbnRDqWzr1C6EvClPQFEfBaIolHM3hhZWzqe8pPaZSnQZjFOnb47Dw-XdJvq2g1GPzuuJbqKp1kP_fGlfwPqlAGuOoo2X9Atm0UCuAz4AtXQBiuD8K4iZ713H6_WdT73saiXNQVdKpMEubjnnVcZyAp07LyAB2NsxzPYdLUiS3Lm6tsPLut9KlEBsDlRjtmmpavoA1RdPyJi9amrq10NnHFpa4It99Wy6_r2ya60AaOdwXxLjStEcX1prfMf1T-sCtEdl1o52_UZhMbLeZ2AHbLuPaMaJM5wR4QbgN8THmTH8Juidk1jyDZebPcMB3qodGcojdRe8rc2G7Mv5bE3ZEadFS0dwoxqxnryRqeWFv_kiatq50yevm6zy_4yXI-54vZavEIHYQJqLchOvh6NL88bHeyaNQcINbenQ3cMh7Dv_u4Sxzd9fLTiKDFM_TUAoUPDRWfo4EqXqDHZ9af8RL92sNIbBiJyxw7RmJgJO4xUn_bZyTuMhJ3GYkdI3GfkRgYiVtG6hYtI3GfkdgwEl8V2DHyFVqezBbHp549GsTLaJJUXsp8SSjo9Uw0mjVgsWIqy3OZk2kEqlYEUtKYKFCnqaJKxpmQ6VSRLBRhngjyGg2LslBvEQ4Iy0MZU-H7OVUsEKnevFYwVMmIkVyMUOAw4ZnNm6-Pb7nmziC55hpHrnHkfsABxxEat3VuzKPe--vEQc1dPDTM4Gprh5otD_g25D7XzoowIlQ7Z0C7s2iEoramVcxGCXNg8709fnaM4jCd6D1CUaiyhp5YDDz2CYtH6I2hWvsEIQPBG_jk3QNqv0dPdn_cD2hYbWr1EeR7lX6y_5A_FKv8Tw
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-Institutional+Review+of+Outcomes+and+Complications+of+Robot-Assisted+Laparoscopic+Extravesical+Ureteral+Reimplantation+for+Treatment+of+Primary+Vesicoureteral+Reflux+in+Children&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+urology&rft.au=Boysen%2C+William+R&rft.au=Ellison%2C+Jonathan+S&rft.au=Kim%2C+Christina&rft.au=Koh%2C+Chester+J&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.issn=1527-3792&rft.eissn=1527-3792&rft.volume=197&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1555&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.juro.2017.01.062&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00225347%2FS0022534716X00183%2Fcov150h.gif