The Effects of Artificial Intelligence Assistance on the Radiologists’ Assessment of Lung Nodules on CT Scans: A Systematic Review
To reduce the number of missed or misdiagnosed lung nodules on CT scans by radiologists, many Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms have been developed. Some algorithms are currently being implemented in clinical practice, but the question is whether radiologists and patients really benefit from t...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of clinical medicine Vol. 12; no. 10; p. 3536 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Switzerland
MDPI AG
18.05.2023
MDPI |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 2077-0383 2077-0383 |
| DOI | 10.3390/jcm12103536 |
Cover
| Summary: | To reduce the number of missed or misdiagnosed lung nodules on CT scans by radiologists, many Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithms have been developed. Some algorithms are currently being implemented in clinical practice, but the question is whether radiologists and patients really benefit from the use of these novel tools. This study aimed to review how AI assistance for lung nodule assessment on CT scans affects the performances of radiologists. We searched for studies that evaluated radiologists’ performances in the detection or malignancy prediction of lung nodules with and without AI assistance. Concerning detection, radiologists achieved with AI assistance a higher sensitivity and AUC, while the specificity was slightly lower. Concerning malignancy prediction, radiologists achieved with AI assistance generally a higher sensitivity, specificity and AUC. The radiologists’ workflows of using the AI assistance were often only described in limited detail in the papers. As recent studies showed improved performances of radiologists with AI assistance, AI assistance for lung nodule assessment holds great promise. To achieve added value of AI tools for lung nodule assessment in clinical practice, more research is required on the clinical validation of AI tools, impact on follow-up recommendations and ways of using AI tools. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
| ISSN: | 2077-0383 2077-0383 |
| DOI: | 10.3390/jcm12103536 |