Using the Platelet Function Analyzer-100 for monitoring aspirin therapy

The aim of the study was to evaluate the test characteristics of the Platelet Function Analyzer-100 (PFA-100) in patients treated with aspirin. The study consisted of two sub-studies. In study 1, 10 patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) and 10 controls had platelet function assessed by optical...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThrombosis research Vol. 120; no. 2; pp. 161 - 172
Main Authors Poulsen, Tina Svenstrup, Mickley, Hans, Korsholm, Lars, Licht, Peter Bjørn, Haghfelt, Torben, Jørgensen, Bo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Ltd 01.01.2007
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0049-3848
1879-2472
DOI10.1016/j.thromres.2006.08.010

Cover

More Information
Summary:The aim of the study was to evaluate the test characteristics of the Platelet Function Analyzer-100 (PFA-100) in patients treated with aspirin. The study consisted of two sub-studies. In study 1, 10 patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) and 10 controls had platelet function assessed by optical platelet aggregation and the PFA-100 method in two 5-week periods. Patients with IHD were treated with aspirin 150 mg/day (first 5-week period), and 300 mg/day (second 5-week period), whereas the controls only received aspirin (150 mg/day) during the second 5-week period. From the results of study 1, we found that a cut-off value for the PFA-100 collagen/epinephrine cartridge <165 s identified patients not taking aspirin (sensitivity 0.91, specificity 1.00). A good agreement between the PFA-100 method and optical platelet aggregation was found. Within-subject variation for the PFA-100 collagen/epinephrine cartridge was ±28%, as compared to ±17% for the optical platelet aggregation. Study 2 included 298 aspirin treated patients who were admitted with symptoms suggestive of an acute myocardial infarction. Platelet function was assessed in duplicate by the PFA-100 collagen/epinephrine cartridge, and a 95% Limit of Agreement interval at [−65%, 65%] indicated a limited precision. We defined a cut-off value below which patients not taking aspirin can be identified. However, due to imprecision of the PFA-100 method repeated duplicate assessment of the collagen/epinephrine Closure Time is recommended.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0049-3848
1879-2472
DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2006.08.010