Sonographic visibility of the main posterior ankle ligaments and para-ligamentous structures in 15 healthy subjects

• Published in: Journal of ultrasound Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 23 - 33
• Main Authors: Stella, Salvatore Massimo, Ciampi, Barbara, Del Chiaro, Andrea, Vallone, Gianfranco, Miccoli, Mario, Gulisano, Massimo, Orsitto, Eugenio, Galletti, Stefano
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01.03.2021; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Ankle; Ankle Joint - diagnostic imaging; Body size; Correlation coefficients; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Imaging; Ligaments; Ligaments, Articular - diagnostic imaging; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Operators; Original Paper; Position measurement; Thickness; Ultrasonography; Ultrasound; Visibility; Posterior talofibular ligament; Musculoskeletal ultrasound; Ankle ligaments; Posterior tibiofibular ligament
• ISSN: 1876-7931; 1971-3495; 1876-7931
• DOI: 10.1007/s40477-019-00420-2

The present article describes the ultrasound (US) appearance of ligaments and paraligamentous structures which are not included in standard US imaging of the ankle: the posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL), the transverse tibiofibular ligament (TTFL), the posterior talofibular ligament (PTFL), the posterior intermalleolar ligament (PIL), the synovial recess (SR) of the posterior joint and the os trigonum (OT). Two skilled operators examined 15 ankles in 15 healthy volunteers. Correlation between thickness of the main ligaments and body mass index (BMI) was also analyzed. Compound and tissue harmonic imaging (THI) were carried out using 12-, 6–15- and 9-MHz linear probes. Exploration of the posterior ankle ligament complex is accurately described including correct ankle position, echogenicity, shape, direction and thickness. Both operators identified and measured the main ligaments (PITFL, TTFL and PTFL) in all volunteers (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ranged from 0.8 to 1); both operators also detected SR and OT in 2/15 ankles and posterior intermalleolar ligament (PIL) in 5/15 ankles. Pearson’s test showed a significant correlation (< 0.05) between TTFL thickness and BMI. Also, a dynamic study was carried out showing tension of the PTFL during dorsiflexion in 7/15 subjects. Our results highlight the potential role of accurate US imaging in detecting posterior ankle ligament involvement in acute and chronic traumas. To our knowledge, there are no previous articles in the literature dealing with this topic providing an accurate description of the US procedure, and in particular, no study has been carried out to identify OT.