Metapopulation distribution shapes year‐round overlap with fisheries for a circumpolar seabird

• Published in: Ecological applications Vol. 35; no. 3; pp. e70019 - n/a
• Main Authors: Rexer‐Huber, Kalinka, Clay, Thomas A., Catry, Paulo, Debski, Igor, Parker, Graham, Ramos, Raül, Robertson, Bruce C., Ryan, Peter G., Sagar, Paul M., Stanworth, Andrew, Thompson, David R., Tuck, Geoffrey N., Weimerskirch, Henri, Phillips, Richard A.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.04.2025
• Subjects: Animal Distribution; Animal Migration; Animals; biologging; Birds - physiology; bycatch mitigation; Conservation of Natural Resources; Fisheries; geolocator; longline fisheries; migratory connectivity; Population Dynamics; Regional Fisheries Management Organization; trawl fisheries; white‐chinned petrel; trawl fisheries; bycatch mitigation; white‐chinned petrel; Regional Fisheries Management Organization; migratory connectivity; biologging; geolocator; longline fisheries
• ISSN: 1051-0761; 1939-5582; 1939-5582
• DOI: 10.1002/eap.70019

Although fisheries bycatch is the greatest threat to many migratory marine megafauna, it remains unclear how population exposure to bycatch varies across the global range of threatened species. Such assessments across multiple populations are crucial for understanding variation in impacts and for identifying the management bodies responsible for reducing bycatch. Here, we combine extensive biologging data from white‐chinned petrel (Procellaria aequinoctialis) populations (representing >98% of their global breeding population) with pelagic and demersal longline and trawl fishing effort to map the global distribution and fisheries‐overlap hotspots for the most bycaught seabird in the Southern Hemisphere. We tracked the year‐round movements of 132 adults in 2006–2018 and examined spatial overlap among seven populations comprising three genetically distinct groupings (metapopulations). Foraging areas during the nonbreeding season were more concentrated than during breeding, with birds from all populations migrating to continental shelf or upwelling zones, but with low spatial overlap among metapopulations. Fisheries overlap differed more among than within metapopulations, underlining that these should be considered separate management units. Overlap with pelagic longline fisheries was greatest for Indian Ocean populations, and from the fleets of South Africa, Japan, Taiwan, and Spain, off southern Africa and in the High Seas. Overlap with demersal longline and trawl fisheries was greatest for Indian and Atlantic Ocean populations, within the Exclusive Economic Zones of South Africa, Namibia, and Argentina, and with the South Korean demersal longline fleet in the High Seas. The high overlap with South Korean longliners in the southwest Atlantic Ocean is of particular concern as demersal fishing in this region is not covered by any Regional Fisheries Management Organization (RFMO). We also identified fisheries‐overlap hotspots within RFMOs where there are no seabird‐bycatch mitigation requirements (1.5%–53.1% of total overlap within the area of competence of each RFMO), or where current mitigation regulations need to be strengthened. Our recommendations are that management bodies target the high‐priority fisheries we have identified for improved bycatch monitoring, mandatory best‐practice bycatch mitigation, and close monitoring of compliance, given the conservation concerns for white‐chinned petrels and other threatened seabirds.