Experimental evaluation of the GE NM/CT 870 CZT clinical SPECT system equipped with WEHR and MEHRS collimator

• Published in: Journal of applied clinical medical physics Vol. 22; no. 2; pp. 165 - 177
• Main Authors: Ito, Toshimune, Matsusaka, Yohji, Onoguchi, Masahisa, Ichikawa, Hajime, Okuda, Koichi, Shibutani, Takayuki, Shishido, Masaaki, Sato, Kozo
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.02.2021; John Wiley and Sons Inc
• Subjects: Clinical medicine; Discovery NM/CT 870 CZT ⇒ NM/CT 870 CZT; Energy; Medical Imaging; medium‐energy high‐resolution sensitivity collimator; Physics; Sensors; Tomography; wide‐energy high‐resolution collimator; United States > US; Japan; medium-energy high-resolution sensitivity collimator; Discovery NM/CT 870 CZT ⇒ NM/CT 870 CZT; wide-energy high-resolution collimator
• ISSN: 1526-9914; 1526-9914
• DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13158

Purpose A high‐energy‐resolution whole‐body SPECT‐CT device (NM/CT 870 CZT; C‐SPECT) equipped with a CZT detector has been developed and is being used clinically. A MEHRS collimator has also been developed recently, with an expected improvement in imaging accuracy using medium‐energy radionuclides. The objective of this study was to compare and analyze the accuracies of the following devices: a WEHR collimator and the MEHRS collimator installed on a C‐SPECT, and a NaI scintillation detector‐equipped Anger‐type SPECT (A‐SPECT) scanner, with a LEHR and LMEGP. Methods A line phantom was used to measure the energy resolutions including collimator characteristics in the planar acquisition of each device using 99mTc and 123I. We also measured the system's sensitivity and high‐contrast resolution using a lead bar phantom. We evaluated SPECT spatial resolution, high‐contrast resolution, radioactivity concentration linearity, and homogeneity, using a basic performance evaluation phantom. In addition, the effect of scatter correction was evaluated by varying the sub window (SW) employed for scattering correction. Results The energy resolution with 99mTc was 5.6% in C‐SPECT with WEHR and 9.9% in A‐SPECT with LEHR. Using 123I, the results were 9.1% in C‐SPECT with WEHR, 5.5% in C‐SPECT with MEHRS, and 10.4% in A‐SPECT with LMEGP. The planar spatial resolution was similar under all conditions, but C‐SPECT performed better in SPECT acquisition. High‐contrast resolution was improved in C‐SPECT under planar condition and SPECT. The sensitivity and homogeneity were improved by setting the SW for scattering correction to 3% of the main peak in C‐SPECT. Conclusion C‐SPECT demonstrates excellent energy resolution and improved high‐contrast resolution for each radionuclide. In addition, when using 123I, careful attention should be paid to SW for scatter correction. By setting the appropriate SW, C‐SPECT with MEHRS has an excellent scattered ray removal effect, and highly homogenous imaging is possible while maintaining the high‐contrast resolution.