Laboratory tools for the direct detection of bacterial respiratory infections and antimicrobial resistance: a scoping review

• Published in: Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation Vol. 36; no. 3; pp. 400 - 417
• Main Authors: Adewusi, Olufunto O., Waldner, Cheryl L., Hanington, Patrick C., Hill, Janet E., Freeman, Claire N., Otto, Simon J. G.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Los Angeles, CA SAGE Publications 01.05.2024
• Subjects: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology; Bacteria - drug effects; Bacteria - genetics; Bacteria - isolation & purification; Bacterial Infections - diagnosis; Bacterial Infections - microbiology; Bacterial Infections - veterinary; Drug Resistance, Bacterial - genetics; Humans; Metagenomics; Respiratory Tract Infections - diagnosis; Respiratory Tract Infections - microbiology; Respiratory Tract Infections - veterinary; long-read metagenomic sequencing; antimicrobial stewardship; antimicrobial resistance; respiratory disease; laboratory testing
• ISSN: 1040-6387; 1943-4936
• DOI: 10.1177/10406387241235968

Rapid laboratory tests are urgently required to inform antimicrobial use in food animals. Our objective was to synthesize knowledge on the direct application of long-read metagenomic sequencing to respiratory samples to detect bacterial pathogens and antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) compared to PCR, loop-mediated isothermal amplification, and recombinase polymerase amplification. Our scoping review protocol followed the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA Scoping Review reporting guidelines. Included studies reported on the direct application of these methods to respiratory samples from animals or humans to detect bacterial pathogens ±ARGs and included turnaround time (TAT) and analytical sensitivity. We excluded studies not reporting these or that were focused exclusively on bioinformatics. We identified 5,636 unique articles from 5 databases. Two-reviewer screening excluded 3,964, 788, and 784 articles at 3 levels, leaving 100 articles (19 animal and 81 human), of which only 7 studied long-read sequencing (only 1 in animals). Thirty-two studies investigated ARGs (only one in animals). Reported TATs ranged from minutes to 2 d; steps did not always include sample collection to results, and analytical sensitivity varied by study. Our review reveals a knowledge gap in research for the direct detection of bacterial respiratory pathogens and ARGs in animals using long-read metagenomic sequencing. There is an opportunity to harness the rapid development in this space to detect multiple pathogens and ARGs on a single sequencing run. Long-read metagenomic sequencing tools show potential to address the urgent need for research into rapid tests to support antimicrobial stewardship in food animal production.