Performance of VisuALL virtual reality visual field testing in healthy children
Virtual reality field testing may provide an alternative to standard automated perimetry. This study evaluates a virtual reality game-based automated perimetry in a healthy pediatric population. A prospective series of pediatric patients at one institution who performed VisuALL perimetry (Olleyes In...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of AAPOS Vol. 28; no. 1; p. 103802 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.02.2024
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1091-8531 1528-3933 1528-3933 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004 |
Cover
| Abstract | Virtual reality field testing may provide an alternative to standard automated perimetry. This study evaluates a virtual reality game-based automated perimetry in a healthy pediatric population.
A prospective series of pediatric patients at one institution who performed VisuALL perimetry (Olleyes Inc, Summit, NJ) using a game-based algorithm. Participants were examined by an experienced pediatric optometrist or ophthalmologist, who confirmed that there was no evidence of ocular disease expected to affect visual fields. Testing was performed binocularly, with the child wearing their spectacle correction in place. Age, refractive error, test duration, false positives, and stereoacuity were evaluated for associations with performance on VisuALL, as defined by mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD).
A total of 191 eyes of 97 patients (54% female) were included, with a mean age of 11.9 ± 3.1 years. The average MD was −1.82 ± 3.5 dB, with a mean foveal sensitivity of 32.0 ± 4.7 dB. Fifty-nine eyes (30.9%) had MD < −2 dB. Better performance, as assessed by MD and PSD, was associated with shorter test duration (P < 0.001) and older age (P < 0.001). False positives (P = 0.442), wearing spectacles (P = 0.092), Titmus stereoacuity (P = 0.197), and refractive error (P = 0.120) did not appear to be associated with improved performance, adjusting for age as a covariate.
VisuALL virtual reality field testing was well tolerated in this pediatric study cohort. Older age and shorter test duration were associated with better performance on field testing. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Virtual reality field testing may provide an alternative to standard automated perimetry. This study evaluates a virtual reality game-based automated perimetry in a healthy pediatric population.
A prospective series of pediatric patients at one institution who performed VisuALL perimetry (Olleyes Inc, Summit, NJ) using a game-based algorithm. Participants were examined by an experienced pediatric optometrist or ophthalmologist, who confirmed that there was no evidence of ocular disease expected to affect visual fields. Testing was performed binocularly, with the child wearing their spectacle correction in place. Age, refractive error, test duration, false positives, and stereoacuity were evaluated for associations with performance on VisuALL, as defined by mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD).
A total of 191 eyes of 97 patients (54% female) were included, with a mean age of 11.9 ± 3.1 years. The average MD was −1.82 ± 3.5 dB, with a mean foveal sensitivity of 32.0 ± 4.7 dB. Fifty-nine eyes (30.9%) had MD < −2 dB. Better performance, as assessed by MD and PSD, was associated with shorter test duration (P < 0.001) and older age (P < 0.001). False positives (P = 0.442), wearing spectacles (P = 0.092), Titmus stereoacuity (P = 0.197), and refractive error (P = 0.120) did not appear to be associated with improved performance, adjusting for age as a covariate.
VisuALL virtual reality field testing was well tolerated in this pediatric study cohort. Older age and shorter test duration were associated with better performance on field testing. Virtual reality field testing may provide an alternative to standard automated perimetry. This study evaluates a virtual reality game-based automated perimetry in a healthy pediatric population.BACKGROUNDVirtual reality field testing may provide an alternative to standard automated perimetry. This study evaluates a virtual reality game-based automated perimetry in a healthy pediatric population.A prospective series of pediatric patients at one institution who performed VisuALL perimetry (Olleyes Inc, Summit, NJ) using a game-based algorithm. Participants were examined by an experienced pediatric optometrist or ophthalmologist, who confirmed that there was no evidence of ocular disease expected to affect visual fields. Testing was performed binocularly, with the child wearing their spectacle correction in place. Age, refractive error, test duration, false positives, and stereoacuity were evaluated for associations with performance on VisuALL, as defined by mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD).METHODSA prospective series of pediatric patients at one institution who performed VisuALL perimetry (Olleyes Inc, Summit, NJ) using a game-based algorithm. Participants were examined by an experienced pediatric optometrist or ophthalmologist, who confirmed that there was no evidence of ocular disease expected to affect visual fields. Testing was performed binocularly, with the child wearing their spectacle correction in place. Age, refractive error, test duration, false positives, and stereoacuity were evaluated for associations with performance on VisuALL, as defined by mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD).A total of 191 eyes of 97 patients (54% female) were included, with a mean age of 11.9 ± 3.1 years. The average MD was -1.82 ± 3.5 dB, with a mean foveal sensitivity of 32.0 ± 4.7 dB. Fifty-nine eyes (30.9%) had MD < -2 dB. Better performance, as assessed by MD and PSD, was associated with shorter test duration (P < 0.001) and older age (P < 0.001). False positives (P = 0.442), wearing spectacles (P = 0.092), Titmus stereoacuity (P = 0.197), and refractive error (P = 0.120) did not appear to be associated with improved performance, adjusting for age as a covariate.RESULTSA total of 191 eyes of 97 patients (54% female) were included, with a mean age of 11.9 ± 3.1 years. The average MD was -1.82 ± 3.5 dB, with a mean foveal sensitivity of 32.0 ± 4.7 dB. Fifty-nine eyes (30.9%) had MD < -2 dB. Better performance, as assessed by MD and PSD, was associated with shorter test duration (P < 0.001) and older age (P < 0.001). False positives (P = 0.442), wearing spectacles (P = 0.092), Titmus stereoacuity (P = 0.197), and refractive error (P = 0.120) did not appear to be associated with improved performance, adjusting for age as a covariate.VisuALL virtual reality field testing was well tolerated in this pediatric study cohort. Older age and shorter test duration were associated with better performance on field testing.CONCLUSIONSVisuALL virtual reality field testing was well tolerated in this pediatric study cohort. Older age and shorter test duration were associated with better performance on field testing. Virtual reality field testing may provide an alternative to standard automated perimetry. This study evaluates a virtual reality game-based automated perimetry in a healthy pediatric population. A prospective series of pediatric patients at one institution who performed VisuALL perimetry (Olleyes Inc, Summit, NJ) using a game-based algorithm. Participants were examined by an experienced pediatric optometrist or ophthalmologist, who confirmed that there was no evidence of ocular disease expected to affect visual fields. Testing was performed binocularly, with the child wearing their spectacle correction in place. Age, refractive error, test duration, false positives, and stereoacuity were evaluated for associations with performance on VisuALL, as defined by mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD). A total of 191 eyes of 97 patients (54% female) were included, with a mean age of 11.9 ± 3.1 years. The average MD was -1.82 ± 3.5 dB, with a mean foveal sensitivity of 32.0 ± 4.7 dB. Fifty-nine eyes (30.9%) had MD < -2 dB. Better performance, as assessed by MD and PSD, was associated with shorter test duration (P < 0.001) and older age (P < 0.001). False positives (P = 0.442), wearing spectacles (P = 0.092), Titmus stereoacuity (P = 0.197), and refractive error (P = 0.120) did not appear to be associated with improved performance, adjusting for age as a covariate. VisuALL virtual reality field testing was well tolerated in this pediatric study cohort. Older age and shorter test duration were associated with better performance on field testing. BackgroundVirtual reality field testing may provide an alternative to standard automated perimetry. This study evaluates a virtual reality game-based automated perimetry in a healthy pediatric population. MethodsA prospective series of pediatric patients at one institution who performed VisuALL perimetry (Olleyes Inc, Summit, NJ) using a game-based algorithm. Participants were examined by an experienced pediatric optometrist or ophthalmologist, who confirmed that there was no evidence of ocular disease expected to affect visual fields. Testing was performed binocularly, with the child wearing their spectacle correction in place. Age, refractive error, test duration, false positives, and stereoacuity were evaluated for associations with performance on VisuALL, as defined by mean deviation (MD) and pattern standard deviation (PSD). ResultsA total of 191 eyes of 97 patients (54% female) were included, with a mean age of 11.9 ± 3.1 years. The average MD was −1.82 ± 3.5 dB, with a mean foveal sensitivity of 32.0 ± 4.7 dB. Fifty-nine eyes (30.9%) had MD < −2 dB. Better performance, as assessed by MD and PSD, was associated with shorter test duration ( P < 0.001) and older age ( P < 0.001). False positives ( P = 0.442), wearing spectacles ( P = 0.092), Titmus stereoacuity ( P = 0.197), and refractive error ( P = 0.120) did not appear to be associated with improved performance, adjusting for age as a covariate. ConclusionsVisuALL virtual reality field testing was well tolerated in this pediatric study cohort. Older age and shorter test duration were associated with better performance on field testing. |
| ArticleNumber | 103802 |
| Author | Scriven, Chelsea A. Priestley, Yos El-Dairi, Mays Wang, Bo Taleb, Emma Cheung, Nathan L. Freedman, Sharon F. Alvarez-Falcón, Samuel |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Samuel surname: Alvarez-Falcón fullname: Alvarez-Falcón, Samuel organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina – sequence: 2 givenname: Bo orcidid: 0000-0003-4785-3361 surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Bo organization: Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland – sequence: 3 givenname: Emma surname: Taleb fullname: Taleb, Emma organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina – sequence: 4 givenname: Nathan L. surname: Cheung fullname: Cheung, Nathan L. organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina – sequence: 5 givenname: Chelsea A. surname: Scriven fullname: Scriven, Chelsea A. organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina – sequence: 6 givenname: Yos surname: Priestley fullname: Priestley, Yos organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina – sequence: 7 givenname: Mays surname: El-Dairi fullname: El-Dairi, Mays organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina – sequence: 8 givenname: Sharon F. orcidid: 0000-0003-3615-3511 surname: Freedman fullname: Freedman, Sharon F. email: sharon.freedman@duke.edu organization: Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38219921$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNqVUk1r3DAQFSWl-Wj_QSk-9uKNPmxZLqUQQtoGFlJI2quQ5VFXrlbaSnJg_31lNrkUQshF0ozeezO8mVN05IMHhN4TvCKY8PNpNSm1C2lFMWUltcK4eYVOSEtFzXrGjsob96QWLSPH6DSlCWPMe0LeoGMmKOl7Sk7QzQ-IJsSt8hqqYKpfNs0X63V1b2OelasiKGfzvsRpCY0FN1YZUrb-d2V9tSn_ebOv9Ma6MYJ_i14b5RK8e7jP0M-vV3eX3-v1zbfry4t1rZsO51oQYdpBlDY0Hca21UA6xptyABYCN0NHB847ZQQvTSvBiVGCchiY6QVvMTtDHw-6uxj-zqUfubVJg3PKQ5iTpD1paNuIvivQDw_QedjCKHfRblXcy0cTCuDTAaBjSCmCkdpmlW3wOSrrJMFycVxO8uC4XBxfssXxQm7-Iz_qP0P7cqBBMeneQpRJWyhDGG0EneUY7EsFtLPeauX-wB7SFOboywAkkYlKLG-XXVhWgTZlDTAVReDz0wLP1_8HqzDEKg |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1111_opo_13449 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1167/tvst.12.1.6 10.1007/BF00158022 10.1016/j.xops.2021.100105 10.1167/tvst.10.3.20 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003996 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1987.tb08515.x 10.1097/APO.0000000000000409 10.4103/0301-4738.77013 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001670 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00026-3 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001415 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.05.010 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.04.035 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2024 Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2024 – notice: Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1528-3933 |
| EndPage | 103802 |
| ExternalDocumentID | 38219921 10_1016_j_jaapos_2023_10_004 S1091853124000028 1_s2_0_S1091853124000028 |
| Genre | Journal Article |
| GroupedDBID | --- --K --M .1- .FO .~1 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 1~. 1~5 4.4 457 4G. 53G 5GY 5VS 7-5 71M 8P~ AAEDT AAEDW AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAOAW AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AATTM AAXKI AAXUO AAYWO ABBQC ABJNI ABMAC ABMZM ABOCM ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFS ACIEU ACLOT ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO AEBSH AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGHFR AGQPQ AGUBO AGYEJ AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV CAG COF CS3 DU5 EBS EFJIC EFKBS EFLBG EJD EO8 EO9 EP2 EP3 FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-Q GBLVA HVGLF HZ~ IHE J1W KOM M41 MO0 N9A O-L O9- OAUVE OF- OPF OQ~ OZT P-8 P-9 P2P PC. Q38 R2- ROL RPZ SDF SDG SDP SEL SES SEW SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K UHS Z5R ~G- ~HD AACTN AFCTW RIG AAIAV AAYXX CITATION AGCQF AGRNS CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-818f5b8821c2bd55ce17364173e08804b72b667af86006a861fa826eb3f986503 |
| IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
| ISSN | 1091-8531 1528-3933 |
| IngestDate | Sat Sep 27 22:44:43 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:58:37 EDT 2025 Sat Oct 25 05:51:49 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:53:56 EDT 2025 Sat Mar 23 16:30:18 EDT 2024 Tue Feb 25 20:07:56 EST 2025 Tue Oct 14 19:29:42 EDT 2025 |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Language | English |
| License | Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c470t-818f5b8821c2bd55ce17364173e08804b72b667af86006a861fa826eb3f986503 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Commentary-3 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-4785-3361 0000-0003-3615-3511 |
| PMID | 38219921 |
| PQID | 2914254897 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 1 |
| ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_2914254897 pubmed_primary_38219921 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_jaapos_2023_10_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jaapos_2023_10_004 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jaapos_2023_10_004 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S1091853124000028 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_jaapos_2023_10_004 |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2024-02-01 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-02-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2024 text: 2024-02-01 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | United States |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of AAPOS |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J AAPOS |
| PublicationYear | 2024 |
| Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
| References | Greenfield, Deiner, Nguyen (bib10) 2022; 2 Mees, Upadhyaya, Kumar (bib9) 2020; 29 Groth, Linton, Brown, Makadia, Donahue (bib6) 2023; 12 Iskander, Ogunsola, Ramachandran, McGowan, Al-Aswad (bib7) 2021; 10 Glen, Baker, Crabb (bib2) 2014; 4 Kedar, Ghate, Corbett (bib3) 2011; 59 Johnson, Keltner, Balestrery (bib14) 1981; 50 Morales, Weitzman, González De La Rosa (bib5) 2000; 107 Montelongo, Gonzalez, Morgenstern, Donahue, Groth (bib11) 2021; 10 Razeghinejad, Gonzalez-Garcia, Myers, Katz (bib8) 2021; 30 Yohannan, Wang, Brown (bib13) 2017; 124 Hudson, Wild, O’Neill (bib4) 1994; 35 Aref, Budenz (bib1) 2017; 124 Wood, Wild, Hussey, Crews (bib12) 1987; 65 Aref (10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib1) 2017; 124 Iskander (10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib7) 2021; 10 Greenfield (10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib10) 2022; 2 Wood (10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib12) 1987; 65 Yohannan (10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib13) 2017; 124 Morales (10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib5) 2000; 107 Razeghinejad (10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib8) 2021; 30 Kedar (10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib3) 2011; 59 Hudson (10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib4) 1994; 35 Montelongo (10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib11) 2021; 10 Johnson (10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib14) 1981; 50 Groth (10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib6) 2023; 12 Mees (10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib9) 2020; 29 Glen (10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib2) 2014; 4 |
| References_xml | – volume: 10 start-page: 244 year: 2021 end-page: 252 ident: bib7 article-title: Virtual reality and augmented reality in ophthalmology: a contemporary prospective publication-title: Asia-Pacific J Ophthalmol (Phila) – volume: 65 start-page: 326 year: 1987 end-page: 333 ident: bib12 article-title: Serial examination of the normal visual field using Octopus automated projection perimetry Evidence for a learning effect publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol – volume: 2 year: 2022 ident: bib10 article-title: Virtual reality oculokinetic perimetry test reproducibility and relationship to conventional perimetry and OCT publication-title: Ophthalmol Sci – volume: 4 start-page: 1 year: 2014 end-page: 10 ident: bib2 article-title: A qualitative investigation into patients’ views on visual field testing for glaucoma monitoring publication-title: BMJ Open – volume: 29 start-page: 86 year: 2020 end-page: 91 ident: bib9 article-title: Validation of a head-mounted virtual reality visual field screening device publication-title: J Glaucoma – volume: 50 start-page: 371 year: 1981 end-page: 388 ident: bib14 article-title: Static and acuity profile perimetry at various adaptation levels publication-title: Doc Ophthalmol – volume: 107 start-page: 134 year: 2000 end-page: 142 ident: bib5 article-title: Comparison between tendency-oriented perimetry (TOP) and octopus threshold perimetry publication-title: Ophthalmology – volume: 30 start-page: 17 year: 2021 end-page: 23 ident: bib8 article-title: Preliminary report on a novel virtual reality perimeter compared with standard automated perimetry publication-title: J Glaucoma – volume: 35 start-page: 268 year: 1994 end-page: 280 ident: bib4 article-title: Fatigue effects during a single session of automated static threshold perimetry publication-title: Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci – volume: 10 start-page: 1 year: 2021 end-page: 8 ident: bib11 article-title: A virtual reality-based automated perimeter, device, and pilot study publication-title: Transl Vis Sci Technol – volume: 59 start-page: 103 year: 2011 end-page: 109 ident: bib3 article-title: Visual fields in neuro-ophthalmology publication-title: Indian J Ophthalmol – volume: 124 start-page: S51 year: 2017 end-page: S56 ident: bib1 article-title: Detecting visual field progression publication-title: Ophthalmology – volume: 124 start-page: 1612 year: 2017 end-page: 1620 ident: bib13 article-title: Evidence-based criteria for assessment of visual field reliability publication-title: Ophthalmology – volume: 12 start-page: 6 year: 2023 ident: bib6 article-title: Evaluation of virtual reality perimetry and standard automated perimetry in normal children publication-title: Transl Vis Sci Technol – volume: 12 start-page: 6 year: 2023 ident: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib6 article-title: Evaluation of virtual reality perimetry and standard automated perimetry in normal children publication-title: Transl Vis Sci Technol doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.1.6 – volume: 35 start-page: 268 year: 1994 ident: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib4 article-title: Fatigue effects during a single session of automated static threshold perimetry publication-title: Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci – volume: 50 start-page: 371 year: 1981 ident: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib14 article-title: Static and acuity profile perimetry at various adaptation levels publication-title: Doc Ophthalmol doi: 10.1007/BF00158022 – volume: 2 year: 2022 ident: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib10 article-title: Virtual reality oculokinetic perimetry test reproducibility and relationship to conventional perimetry and OCT publication-title: Ophthalmol Sci doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2021.100105 – volume: 10 start-page: 1 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib11 article-title: A virtual reality-based automated perimeter, device, and pilot study publication-title: Transl Vis Sci Technol doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.3.20 – volume: 4 start-page: 1 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib2 article-title: A qualitative investigation into patients’ views on visual field testing for glaucoma monitoring publication-title: BMJ Open doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003996 – volume: 65 start-page: 326 year: 1987 ident: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib12 article-title: Serial examination of the normal visual field using Octopus automated projection perimetry Evidence for a learning effect publication-title: Acta Ophthalmol doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1987.tb08515.x – volume: 10 start-page: 244 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib7 article-title: Virtual reality and augmented reality in ophthalmology: a contemporary prospective publication-title: Asia-Pacific J Ophthalmol (Phila) doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000409 – volume: 59 start-page: 103 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib3 article-title: Visual fields in neuro-ophthalmology publication-title: Indian J Ophthalmol doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.77013 – volume: 30 start-page: 17 year: 2021 ident: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib8 article-title: Preliminary report on a novel virtual reality perimeter compared with standard automated perimetry publication-title: J Glaucoma doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001670 – volume: 107 start-page: 134 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib5 article-title: Comparison between tendency-oriented perimetry (TOP) and octopus threshold perimetry publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)00026-3 – volume: 29 start-page: 86 year: 2020 ident: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib9 article-title: Validation of a head-mounted virtual reality visual field screening device publication-title: J Glaucoma doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001415 – volume: 124 start-page: S51 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib1 article-title: Detecting visual field progression publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.05.010 – volume: 124 start-page: 1612 year: 2017 ident: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004_bib13 article-title: Evidence-based criteria for assessment of visual field reliability publication-title: Ophthalmology doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.04.035 |
| SSID | ssj0006911 |
| Score | 2.3729708 |
| Snippet | Virtual reality field testing may provide an alternative to standard automated perimetry. This study evaluates a virtual reality game-based automated perimetry... BackgroundVirtual reality field testing may provide an alternative to standard automated perimetry. This study evaluates a virtual reality game-based automated... |
| SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
| SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 103802 |
| SubjectTerms | Adolescent Child Eye Female Humans Male Ophthalmology Refractive Errors - diagnosis Refractive Errors - therapy Vision Disorders Visual Field Tests Visual Fields |
| Title | Performance of VisuALL virtual reality visual field testing in healthy children |
| URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S1091853124000028 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S1091853124000028 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2023.10.004 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38219921 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2914254897 |
| Volume | 28 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| journalDatabaseRights | – providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: Baden-Württemberg Complete Freedom Collection (Elsevier) customDbUrl: eissn: 1528-3933 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0006911 issn: 1091-8531 databaseCode: GBLVA dateStart: 20110101 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com providerName: Elsevier – providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: Elsevier SD Complete Freedom Collection [SCCMFC] customDbUrl: eissn: 1528-3933 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0006911 issn: 1091-8531 databaseCode: ACRLP dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com providerName: Elsevier – providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals [SCFCJ] customDbUrl: eissn: 1528-3933 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0006911 issn: 1091-8531 databaseCode: AIKHN dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com providerName: Elsevier – providerCode: PRVESC databaseName: ScienceDirect (Elsevier) customDbUrl: eissn: 1528-3933 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0006911 issn: 1091-8531 databaseCode: .~1 dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com providerName: Elsevier – providerCode: PRVLSH databaseName: Elsevier Journals customDbUrl: mediaType: online eissn: 1528-3933 dateEnd: 99991231 omitProxy: true ssIdentifier: ssj0006911 issn: 1091-8531 databaseCode: AKRWK dateStart: 19970301 isFulltext: true providerName: Library Specific Holdings |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnR3bSsMwNIwJ4ot4d15GBF-7rW2ato9jOKbOOdTJ3kLapdIh7Vg3wRe_3XN62RQdE19aEk5Ie3Ku5FwIuZTgc1m-09BGoDw0ZlnAc8o1NVPpPigs5fK0SNJdj3cG7GZoDUukVeTCYFhlLvszmZ5K63ymnmOzPgnD-iOWtARlo2MUJLoOmMHObOxiUPtYhnlwN-3Bi8AaQhfpc2mM11jKSYxFuw2zlsZ4sVXqaZX5maqh9g7Zzu1H2sw-cZeUVLRHNu_yG_J9ct9fZgLQOKDPYTJvdrv0LZxipggFGxENbxgnOEwD2OgMS21ELzSMaJYX-U6LJO8DMmhfPbU6Wt40QfOZ3ZhpoIADywO7WfcNb2RZvtJtkzN4KBAoDebZhse5LQMHTB0uHa4HElwM8KkD1wFzzTwk5SiO1DGhEu9_lWmDy-Eyz_AcP1AyGGEl24D7hl0hZoEr4ecVxbGxxasoQsfGIsOwQAzjLGC4QrTFqklWUWMNvFUcgyiyRUG-CRD5a9bZv61TSc6kidBFYoiG-EFIX1d-o8U_7HlR0IkANsW7FxmpeA5Arg7SkTkuYO0oI6DF35twWIBU_eTf-56SLRixLJr8jJRn07k6B2Np5lVTbqiSjWbrodvH9_Vtp_cJO4kR-A |
| linkProvider | Elsevier |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnR1dS8MwMEwF9UX8dn5G8LXb2iZp-yjimLpNwU32FtIulQ7pxroJvvjbveuHU3RMfCkkvSPt5T7J3YWQCwUxFw_cmtEH42EwzkHmtGcbtjYDMFjaE2mTpFZbNLrstsd7JXJV1MJgWmWu-zOdnmrrfKaaU7M6iqLqI7a0BGNjYhYkhg5LZIVxy8EIrPI-y_MQXnoJL0IbCF7Uz6VJXgOlRkPs2m3ZlTTJi82zT_P8z9QO1TfJRu5A0svsG7dIScfbZLWVH5HvkPuHWSkAHYb0KUqml80mfY3GWCpCwUlEzxvGCQ7TDDY6wV4b8TONYpoVRr7Rosp7l3Tr152rhpHfmmAEzKlNDLDAIffBcTYDy-9zHmjTsQWDhwaNUmO-Y_lCOCp0wdcRyhVmqCDGgKA69Fzw1-w9shwPY31AqMIDYG07EHN4zLd8Nwi1CvvYyjYUgeWUiV3QSgZ5S3G82eJFFrljA5lRWCKFcRYoXCbGJ9Yoa6mxAJ4X2yCLclFQcBJ0_gI85zc8neRSmkhTJpasyR-c9BXzGzP-Yc3zgk8kyCkevqhYD6cA5JmgHpnrAdX2Mwb6_HsbNguIah7-e90zstbotJqyedO-OyLr8IZlqeXHZHkynuoT8Jwm_mkqGR_fgBH4 |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance+of+VisuALL+virtual+reality+visual+field+testing+in+healthy+children&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+AAPOS&rft.au=Alvarez-Falc%C3%B3n%2C+Samuel&rft.au=Wang%2C+Bo&rft.au=Taleb%2C+Emma&rft.au=Cheung%2C+Nathan+L.&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Inc&rft.issn=1091-8531&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jaapos.2023.10.004&rft.externalDocID=S1091853124000028 |
| thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F10918531%2FS1091853124X00026%2Fcov150h.gif |