Modeling the Remote Associates Test as Retrievals from Semantic Memory

The Remote Associates Test (RAT) is a word association retrieval task that consists of a series of problems, each with three seemingly unrelated prompt words. The subject is asked to produce a single word that is related to all three prompt words. In this paper, we provide support for a theory in wh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCognitive science Vol. 46; no. 6; pp. e13145 - n/a
Main Authors Schatz, Jule, Jones, Steven J., Laird, John E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Wiley 01.06.2022
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0364-0213
1551-6709
1551-6709
DOI10.1111/cogs.13145

Cover

More Information
Summary:The Remote Associates Test (RAT) is a word association retrieval task that consists of a series of problems, each with three seemingly unrelated prompt words. The subject is asked to produce a single word that is related to all three prompt words. In this paper, we provide support for a theory in which the RAT assesses a person's ability to retrieve relevant word associations from long‐term memory. We present a computational model of humans solving the RAT and investigate how prior knowledge and memory retrieval mechanisms influence the model's ability to match human behavior. We expand prior modeling attempts by investigating multiple large knowledge bases and by creating a cognitive process model that uses long‐term memory spreading activation retrieval processes inspired by ACT‐R and implemented in Soar. We evaluate multiple model variants for their ability to model human problem difficulty, including the incorporation of noise and base‐level activation into memory retrieval. We conclude that the main factors affecting human difficulty are the existence of associations between prompt words and solutions, the relative strengths and directions of those associations compared to associations to other words, and the ability to perform multiple retrievals.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:0364-0213
1551-6709
1551-6709
DOI:10.1111/cogs.13145