Mechanomyography Signal Pattern Recognition of Knee and Ankle Movements Using Swarm Intelligence Algorithm-Based Feature Selection Methods

• Published in: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) Vol. 23; no. 15; p. 6939
• Main Authors: Zhang, Yue, Sun, Maoxun, Xia, Chunming, Zhou, Jie, Cao, Gangsheng, Wu, Qing
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Switzerland MDPI AG 04.08.2023; MDPI
• Subjects: Accuracy; Algorithms; Ankle; chameleon swarm algorithm; Classification; Computational linguistics; Deep learning; Experiments; Feature selection; Gait; grasshopper optimization algorithm; Language processing; Machine learning; Mathematical optimization; mechanomyography; Methods; Natural language interfaces; Optimization algorithms; Pattern recognition; Rehabilitation; Signal processing; Swarm intelligence; Wavelet transforms; China; grasshopper optimization algorithm; mechanomyography; chameleon swarm algorithm; feature selection; pattern recognition
• ISSN: 1424-8220; 1424-8220
• DOI: 10.3390/s23156939

Pattern recognition of lower-limb movements based on mechanomyography (MMG) signals has a certain application value in the study of wearable rehabilitation-training devices. In this paper, MMG feature selection methods based on a chameleon swarm algorithm (CSA) and a grasshopper optimization algorithm (GOA) are proposed for the pattern recognition of knee and ankle movements in the sitting and standing positions. Wireless multichannel MMG acquisition systems were designed and used to collect MMG movements from four sites on the subjects thighs. The relationship between the threshold values and classification accuracy was analyzed, and comparatively high recognition rates were obtained after redundant information was eliminated. When the threshold value rose, the recognition rates from the CSA fluctuated within a small range: up to 88.17% (sitting position) and 90.07% (standing position). However, the recognition rates from the GOA drop dramatically when increasing the threshold value. The comparison results demonstrated that using a GOA consumes less time and selects fewer features, while a CSA gives higher recognition rates of knee and ankle movements.