Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): clinicopathological study of 45 cases

Background Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare and severe adverse drug reaction. Large detailed studies of histopathological features of DRESS are sparse and suggest an association between keratinocyte damage and the severity of visceral involvement. Objectives To...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Vol. 29; no. 11; pp. 2199 - 2205
Main Authors Skowron, F., Bensaid, B., Balme, B., Depaepe, L., Kanitakis, J., Nosbaum, A., Maucort-Boulch, D., Bérard, F., D'Incan, M., Kardaun, S.H., Nicolas, J.F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2015
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0926-9959
1468-3083
1468-3083
DOI10.1111/jdv.13212

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare and severe adverse drug reaction. Large detailed studies of histopathological features of DRESS are sparse and suggest an association between keratinocyte damage and the severity of visceral involvement. Objectives To describe the dermatopathological features in a large series of DRESS and their possible association with clinical features and the severity of the disease. Methods A retrospective analysis of the clinicobiological and dermatopathological features in a monocentric cohort of patients with DRESS. Results From January 2005 to January 2013, 45 patients were validated as probable or definite cases of DRESS. The median age was 64 years (range 3–87). The most frequent clinical and biological features included: fever ≥38.5°C (95%), facial oedema (72%), enlarged lymph nodes (51%), visceral involvement (75%), blood eosinophilia (97%) and atypical lymphocytes (82%). Severe DRESS occurred in 24% and a fatal outcome in 6% of patients. Histopathological analysis showed that no specific histopathological pattern was characteristic for DRESS. However, several changes in different cutaneous compartments were observed in 2 of 3 of cases. Spongiosis (55%) and keratinocyte damage (53%) were the most common epidermal changes. Spongiosis was associated with non‐severe DRESS (P = 0.041) whereas confluent keratinocyte necrosis correlated with severe DRESS (P = 0.011). Vascular changes were frequent (88%). A moderate dermal perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate was invariably present, containing eosinophils, neutrophils and/or atypical lymphocytes in 57% of cases. Conclusions Epidermal changes are indicative for the severity of DRESS.
Bibliography:INSERM
ArticleID:JDV13212
istex:54BA660DE11488CF7922149F5C3EAA0CC792F684
Hopitaux de Lyon
Table S1. Detailed clinical & biological features of the DRESS cohortTable S2. Detailed histopathological changes in the DRESS cohortTable S3. Number of histopathological changes per skin section
ark:/67375/WNG-2P566N34-X
Conflicts of interest
Funding sources
Institutional funding from Hopitaux de Lyon and INSERM.
None
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0926-9959
1468-3083
1468-3083
DOI:10.1111/jdv.13212