High false negative rate of frozen section examination of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer

Metastatic involvement of the sentinel nodes (SN) is one of the main prognostic factors in cervical cancer which determines the disease management. The results of intra-operative SN examination would make it possible to triage patients in a one-step protocol. The studies carried out on the subject s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGynecologic oncology Vol. 129; no. 2; pp. 384 - 388
Main Authors Slama, J., Dundr, P., Dusek, L., Cibula, D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.05.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0090-8258
1095-6859
1095-6859
DOI10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001

Cover

Abstract Metastatic involvement of the sentinel nodes (SN) is one of the main prognostic factors in cervical cancer which determines the disease management. The results of intra-operative SN examination would make it possible to triage patients in a one-step protocol. The studies carried out on the subject so far have, however, failed to demonstrate adequate accuracy of frozen section examination (FS) and, moreover, they only involved small cohorts. The study included 225 patients with cervical cancer FIGO IA2–IIB in whom at least one SN has been detected and intra-operatively processed. The prevalence of macrometastases, micrometastases and isolated tumour cells (ITC) in the SN was evaluated and the results of FS and final SN ultrastaging were compared. Metastatic involvement of the SN was detected by pathologic ultrastaging in 73 cases (32.4%); macrometastases, micrometastases and ITC were found in 48, 17 and 8 patients, respectively. Intra-operative SN assessment established the SN status correctly in as few as 41 cases (56.2%), or in 49 cases (63%) if ITC had been excluded. Final ultrastaging of intra-operatively negative SN confirmed macrometastases, micrometastases, and ITC in additional 8, 18 and 8 patients, respectively. The false negative rate of FS was higher in bigger tumours (>20cm3) and in the presence of LVSI. Frozen section examination of SN is not sufficiently reliable; it has a high false negative rate mainly due to its limited ability to detect micrometastases. A possible solution would be a more detailed intra-operative pathologic processing or two-step surgical management. ► Intra-operative frozen section examination of sentinel nodes yielded a false negative result in almost half of the cases (44%). ► The sensitivities for diagnosing macrometastases and low-volume disease (micrometastases and isolated tumour cells) were 81% and 8%, respectively. ► False negative rate of frozen section was higher in bigger tumours (>20cm3) and in the presence of LVSI.
AbstractList Metastatic involvement of the sentinel nodes (SN) is one of the main prognostic factors in cervical cancer which determines the disease management. The results of intra-operative SN examination would make it possible to triage patients in a one-step protocol. The studies carried out on the subject so far have, however, failed to demonstrate adequate accuracy of frozen section examination (FS) and, moreover, they only involved small cohorts. The study included 225 patients with cervical cancer FIGO IA2–IIB in whom at least one SN has been detected and intra-operatively processed. The prevalence of macrometastases, micrometastases and isolated tumour cells (ITC) in the SN was evaluated and the results of FS and final SN ultrastaging were compared. Metastatic involvement of the SN was detected by pathologic ultrastaging in 73 cases (32.4%); macrometastases, micrometastases and ITC were found in 48, 17 and 8 patients, respectively. Intra-operative SN assessment established the SN status correctly in as few as 41 cases (56.2%), or in 49 cases (63%) if ITC had been excluded. Final ultrastaging of intra-operatively negative SN confirmed macrometastases, micrometastases, and ITC in additional 8, 18 and 8 patients, respectively. The false negative rate of FS was higher in bigger tumours (>20cm3) and in the presence of LVSI. Frozen section examination of SN is not sufficiently reliable; it has a high false negative rate mainly due to its limited ability to detect micrometastases. A possible solution would be a more detailed intra-operative pathologic processing or two-step surgical management. ► Intra-operative frozen section examination of sentinel nodes yielded a false negative result in almost half of the cases (44%). ► The sensitivities for diagnosing macrometastases and low-volume disease (micrometastases and isolated tumour cells) were 81% and 8%, respectively. ► False negative rate of frozen section was higher in bigger tumours (>20cm3) and in the presence of LVSI.
Metastatic involvement of the sentinel nodes (SN) is one of the main prognostic factors in cervical cancer which determines the disease management. The results of intra-operative SN examination would make it possible to triage patients in a one-step protocol. The studies carried out on the subject so far have, however, failed to demonstrate adequate accuracy of frozen section examination (FS) and, moreover, they only involved small cohorts. The study included 225 patients with cervical cancer FIGO IA2-IIB in whom at least one SN has been detected and intra-operatively processed. The prevalence of macrometastases, micrometastases and isolated tumour cells (ITC) in the SN was evaluated and the results of FS and final SN ultrastaging were compared. Metastatic involvement of the SN was detected by pathologic ultrastaging in 73 cases (32.4%); macrometastases, micrometastases and ITC were found in 48, 17 and 8 patients, respectively. Intra-operative SN assessment established the SN status correctly in as few as 41 cases (56.2%), or in 49 cases (63%) if ITC had been excluded. Final ultrastaging of intra-operatively negative SN confirmed macrometastases, micrometastases, and ITC in additional 8, 18 and 8 patients, respectively. The false negative rate of FS was higher in bigger tumours (>20 cm3) and in the presence of LVSI. Frozen section examination of SN is not sufficiently reliable; it has a high false negative rate mainly due to its limited ability to detect micrometastases. A possible solution would be a more detailed intra-operative pathologic processing or two-step surgical management.
Metastatic involvement of the sentinel nodes (SN) is one of the main prognostic factors in cervical cancer which determines the disease management. The results of intra-operative SN examination would make it possible to triage patients in a one-step protocol. The studies carried out on the subject so far have, however, failed to demonstrate adequate accuracy of frozen section examination (FS) and, moreover, they only involved small cohorts.OBJECTIVESMetastatic involvement of the sentinel nodes (SN) is one of the main prognostic factors in cervical cancer which determines the disease management. The results of intra-operative SN examination would make it possible to triage patients in a one-step protocol. The studies carried out on the subject so far have, however, failed to demonstrate adequate accuracy of frozen section examination (FS) and, moreover, they only involved small cohorts.The study included 225 patients with cervical cancer FIGO IA2-IIB in whom at least one SN has been detected and intra-operatively processed. The prevalence of macrometastases, micrometastases and isolated tumour cells (ITC) in the SN was evaluated and the results of FS and final SN ultrastaging were compared.METHODSThe study included 225 patients with cervical cancer FIGO IA2-IIB in whom at least one SN has been detected and intra-operatively processed. The prevalence of macrometastases, micrometastases and isolated tumour cells (ITC) in the SN was evaluated and the results of FS and final SN ultrastaging were compared.Metastatic involvement of the SN was detected by pathologic ultrastaging in 73 cases (32.4%); macrometastases, micrometastases and ITC were found in 48, 17 and 8 patients, respectively. Intra-operative SN assessment established the SN status correctly in as few as 41 cases (56.2%), or in 49 cases (63%) if ITC had been excluded. Final ultrastaging of intra-operatively negative SN confirmed macrometastases, micrometastases, and ITC in additional 8, 18 and 8 patients, respectively. The false negative rate of FS was higher in bigger tumours (>20 cm3) and in the presence of LVSI.RESULTSMetastatic involvement of the SN was detected by pathologic ultrastaging in 73 cases (32.4%); macrometastases, micrometastases and ITC were found in 48, 17 and 8 patients, respectively. Intra-operative SN assessment established the SN status correctly in as few as 41 cases (56.2%), or in 49 cases (63%) if ITC had been excluded. Final ultrastaging of intra-operatively negative SN confirmed macrometastases, micrometastases, and ITC in additional 8, 18 and 8 patients, respectively. The false negative rate of FS was higher in bigger tumours (>20 cm3) and in the presence of LVSI.Frozen section examination of SN is not sufficiently reliable; it has a high false negative rate mainly due to its limited ability to detect micrometastases. A possible solution would be a more detailed intra-operative pathologic processing or two-step surgical management.CONCLUSIONSFrozen section examination of SN is not sufficiently reliable; it has a high false negative rate mainly due to its limited ability to detect micrometastases. A possible solution would be a more detailed intra-operative pathologic processing or two-step surgical management.
AbstractObjectivesMetastatic involvement of the sentinel nodes (SN) is one of the main prognostic factors in cervical cancer which determines the disease management. The results of intra-operative SN examination would make it possible to triage patients in a one-step protocol. The studies carried out on the subject so far have, however, failed to demonstrate adequate accuracy of frozen section examination (FS) and, moreover, they only involved small cohorts. MethodsThe study included 225 patients with cervical cancer FIGO IA2–IIB in whom at least one SN has been detected and intra-operatively processed. The prevalence of macrometastases, micrometastases and isolated tumour cells (ITC) in the SN was evaluated and the results of FS and final SN ultrastaging were compared. ResultsMetastatic involvement of the SN was detected by pathologic ultrastaging in 73 cases (32.4%); macrometastases, micrometastases and ITC were found in 48, 17 and 8 patients, respectively. Intra-operative SN assessment established the SN status correctly in as few as 41 cases (56.2%), or in 49 cases (63%) if ITC had been excluded. Final ultrastaging of intra-operatively negative SN confirmed macrometastases, micrometastases, and ITC in additional 8, 18 and 8 patients, respectively. The false negative rate of FS was higher in bigger tumours (> 20 cm 3) and in the presence of LVSI. ConclusionsFrozen section examination of SN is not sufficiently reliable; it has a high false negative rate mainly due to its limited ability to detect micrometastases. A possible solution would be a more detailed intra-operative pathologic processing or two-step surgical management.
Author Cibula, D.
Dundr, P.
Slama, J.
Dusek, L.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: J.
  surname: Slama
  fullname: Slama, J.
  email: jiri.slama@vfn.cz
  organization: Gynaecologic Oncology Centre, General University Hospital and 1st School of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
– sequence: 2
  givenname: P.
  surname: Dundr
  fullname: Dundr, P.
  organization: Institute of Pathology, General University Hospital and 1st School of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
– sequence: 3
  givenname: L.
  surname: Dusek
  fullname: Dusek, L.
  organization: Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
– sequence: 4
  givenname: D.
  surname: Cibula
  fullname: Cibula, D.
  organization: Gynaecologic Oncology Centre, General University Hospital and 1st School of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23395889$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkk9vEzEQxS1URNPAJ0BCPnLJ4j-7XlsIpKoCilSJA3C2XHs2cdi1g70JLJ8eb9JeKkFPHmneb0Z-by7QWYgBEHpJSUUJFW-21bSeQqwYobwirCKEPkELSlSzErJRZ2hBiCIryRp5ji5y3hJCOKHsGTpnnKtGSrVA8dqvN7gzfQYcYG1GfwCczAg4drhL8Q8EnMGOPgYMv83ggznWpZshjD5Aj_tp2G1wiA4y9gHviqK0Mv7lxw22kA7emh5bE0r9HD09Lntx9y7R948fvl1dr26-fPp8dXmzsrUQ44orJ5wQSqq2bm3LmDTOOkkE4aCco43jTceJUKqm9S0UMTFcgpAttF1tHV-i16e5uxR_7iGPevDZQt-bAHGfNeWsbVlTK1Wkr-6k-9sBnN4lP5g06XuTikCdBDbFnBN02vrxaMOYjO81JXoORG_1MRA9B6IJ0yWQwvIH7P34_1PvThQUiw4eks62eGrB-VTC0C76R_j3D3jb-zDH8AMmyNu4T6G4r6nOBdBf50OZ74TyciNt-fgSvf33gEfX_wUNtc_L
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2019_07_038
crossref_primary_10_1097_IGC_0000000000000513
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_952347
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v28_i30_4019
crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_24022
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2023_08_019
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2024_06_015
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40064_016_2927_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmig_2013_12_095
crossref_primary_10_3892_ol_2022_13368
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2020_12_001
crossref_primary_10_1097_GCO_0000000000000133
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers14030575
crossref_primary_10_1136_ijgc_2020_001586
crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_16504
crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1916960117
crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_13788
crossref_primary_10_3892_or_2017_5573
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2014_09_010
crossref_primary_10_1136_ijgc_2020_002198
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2020_05_043
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2018_10_007
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13000_023_01294_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2020_05_037
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00404_016_4279_3
crossref_primary_10_23736_S0026_4784_20_04634_1
crossref_primary_10_1038_bjc_2014_278
crossref_primary_10_1136_ijgc_2019_001062
crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_26899
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_remn_2018_04_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2019_08_010
crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_25322
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13669_015_0125_z
crossref_primary_10_3892_mco_2016_923
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12253_019_00727_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2019_01_184
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10147_022_02197_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11596_018_1915_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejca_2020_06_034
crossref_primary_10_1136_ijgc_2019_001113
crossref_primary_10_17116_onkolog2015445_11
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10147_020_01838_z
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12905_025_03550_4
crossref_primary_10_3390_tomography10050058
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2015_04_008
crossref_primary_10_1097_CCO_0000000000000863
crossref_primary_10_3109_07357907_2014_889707
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2024_1435532
crossref_primary_10_5858_arpa_2019_0249_RA
crossref_primary_10_1136_ijgc_2023_005206
crossref_primary_10_3892_ol_2017_5804
crossref_primary_10_1097_IGC_0000000000000738
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2020_08_020
crossref_primary_10_1684_bdc_2014_1928
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rpor_2018_04_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmig_2016_03_003
crossref_primary_10_2217_fon_2016_0260
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_remnie_2018_07_002
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_64926_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eurox_2019_100085
crossref_primary_10_1136_ijgc_2019_000904
crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11222942
crossref_primary_10_1136_ijgc_2023_004523
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12253_020_00822_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10585_014_9670_5
crossref_primary_10_1002_jso_26518
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00404_019_05164_2
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13027_016_0068_7
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.01.026
10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009
10.1016/0090-8258(89)90070-X
10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.08.010
10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.10.018
10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.11.037
10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00519.x
10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.10.049
10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.06.017
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990401)85:7<1547::AID-CNCR16>3.0.CO;2-2
10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.02.010
10.1245/ASO.2004.09.006
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2013 Elsevier Inc.
Elsevier Inc.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2013 Elsevier Inc.
– notice: Elsevier Inc.
– notice: Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE

MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1095-6859
EndPage 388
ExternalDocumentID 23395889
10_1016_j_ygyno_2013_02_001
S0090825813000723
1_s2_0_S0090825813000723
Genre Clinical Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
.~1
0R~
1B1
1P~
1RT
1~.
1~5
29I
3O-
4.4
457
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
7-5
71M
8P~
9JM
AABNK
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AATTM
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACLOT
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADFGL
ADMUD
ADNMO
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHHHB
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CAG
COF
CS3
DM4
DU5
EBS
EFBJH
EFKBS
EFLBG
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-2
G-Q
GBLVA
HED
HMK
HMO
HVGLF
HZ~
IH2
IHE
J1W
K-O
KOM
L7B
LG5
M29
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OQ.
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PH~
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SAE
SCC
SDF
SDG
SDP
SES
SEW
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
UDS
UHS
UV1
WUQ
X7M
XPP
Z5R
ZGI
ZMT
ZU3
ZXP
~G-
~HD
AACTN
AFCTW
AFKWA
AJOXV
AMFUW
RIG
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AHPSJ
AJBFU
LCYCR
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c466t-39d6d66989747c7228adcd80603e9dd15d35f30699414bed6d0a38e687e7f4cd3
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 0090-8258
1095-6859
IngestDate Thu Oct 02 06:55:33 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 06:59:14 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 01 02:58:55 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:10:56 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:28:43 EST 2024
Sun Feb 23 10:19:21 EST 2025
Tue Oct 14 19:31:11 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Lymphadenectomy
Sentinel lymph node
Frozen section
Cervical cancer
Language English
License https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c466t-39d6d66989747c7228adcd80603e9dd15d35f30699414bed6d0a38e687e7f4cd3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
PMID 23395889
PQID 1327725499
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1327725499
pubmed_primary_23395889
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ygyno_2013_02_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ygyno_2013_02_001
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ygyno_2013_02_001
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0090825813000723
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ygyno_2013_02_001
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2013-05-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2013
  text: 2013-05-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Gynecologic oncology
PublicationTitleAlternate Gynecol Oncol
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Sakuragi, Satoh, Takeda, Hareyama, Takeda, Yamamoto (bb0025) 1999; 85
Ho, Chien, Huang, Wu, Shih, Chang (bb0005) 2004; 93
Fader, Edwards, Cost, Kanbour-Shakir, Kelley, Schwartz (bb0035) 2008; 111
Cibula, Abu-Rustum, Dusek, Zikán, Zaal, Sevcik (bb0050) 2012; 124
Cibula, Kuzel, Slama, Fischerova, Dundr, Freitag (bb0020) 2009; 115
Bats, Buénerd, Querleau, Leblanc, Darai, Morice (bb0040) 2011; 123
Lukaszuk, Liss, Gulczynski, Nowaczyk, Nakonieczny, Piatkowski (bb0010) 2007; 104
Fregnani, Latorre, Novik, Lopes, Soares (bb0055) 2006; 16
Gortzak-Uzan, Jimenez, Nofech-Mozes, Ismiil, Khalifa, Dubé (bb0060) 2010; 116
Barranger, Cortez, Grahek, Callard, Uzan, Darai (bb0015) 2004; 11
Delgado, Bundy, Fowler, Stehman, Sevin, Creasman (bb0030) 1989; 35
Slama, Dundr, Dusek, Fischerova, Pinkavova, Zikan (bb0045) 2012; 125
Lukaszuk (10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0010) 2007; 104
Barranger (10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0015) 2004; 11
Cibula (10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0020) 2009; 115
Fader (10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0035) 2008; 111
Bats (10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0040) 2011; 123
Delgado (10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0030) 1989; 35
Gortzak-Uzan (10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0060) 2010; 116
Slama (10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0045) 2012; 125
Cibula (10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0050) 2012; 124
Ho (10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0005) 2004; 93
Fregnani (10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0055) 2006; 16
Sakuragi (10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0025) 1999; 85
References_xml – volume: 116
  start-page: 28
  year: 2010
  end-page: 32
  ident: bb0060
  article-title: Sentinel node biopsy vs. pelvic lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer: Is it time to change the gold standard?
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
– volume: 124
  start-page: 496
  year: 2012
  end-page: 501
  ident: bb0050
  article-title: Prognostic significance of low volume sentinel lymph node disease in early-stage cervical cancer
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
– volume: 93
  start-page: 458
  year: 2004
  end-page: 464
  ident: bb0005
  article-title: Multivariate analysis of the prognostic factors and outcomes in early cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
– volume: 104
  start-page: 721
  year: 2007
  end-page: 726
  ident: bb0010
  article-title: Predictive value of HPV DNA in lymph nodes in surgically treated cervical carcinoma patients—a prospective study
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
– volume: 11
  start-page: 445
  year: 2004
  end-page: 452
  ident: bb0015
  article-title: Laparoscopic sentinel node procedure for cervical cancer: impact of neodjuvant chemoradiotherapy
  publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol
– volume: 125
  start-page: 303
  year: 2012
  end-page: 306
  ident: bb0045
  article-title: Sentinel lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancers and impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
– volume: 115
  start-page: 46
  year: 2009
  end-page: 50
  ident: bb0020
  article-title: Sentinel node (SLN) biopsy in the management of locally advanced cervical cancer
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
– volume: 123
  start-page: 230
  year: 2011
  end-page: 235
  ident: bb0040
  article-title: SENTICOL collaborative group. Diagnostic value of intraoperative examination of sentinel lymph node in early cervical cancer: a prospective, multicenter study
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
– volume: 85
  start-page: 1547
  year: 1999
  end-page: 1554
  ident: bb0025
  article-title: Incidence and distribution pattern of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with Stages IB, IIA, and IIB cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy
  publication-title: Cancer
– volume: 111
  start-page: 13
  year: 2008
  end-page: 17
  ident: bb0035
  article-title: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage cervical cancer: utility of intraoperative versus postoperative assessment
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1188
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1194
  ident: bb0055
  article-title: Assessment of pelvic lymph node micrometastatic disease in stages IB and IIA of carcinoma of the uterine cervix
  publication-title: Int J Gynecol Cancer
– volume: 35
  start-page: 314
  year: 1989
  end-page: 320
  ident: bb0030
  article-title: A prospective surgical pathological study of stage I squamous carcinoma of the cervix:a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
– volume: 93
  start-page: 458
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0005
  article-title: Multivariate analysis of the prognostic factors and outcomes in early cervical cancer patients undergoing radical hysterectomy
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.01.026
– volume: 111
  start-page: 13
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0035
  article-title: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage cervical cancer: utility of intraoperative versus postoperative assessment
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.06.009
– volume: 35
  start-page: 314
  year: 1989
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0030
  article-title: A prospective surgical pathological study of stage I squamous carcinoma of the cervix:a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/0090-8258(89)90070-X
– volume: 123
  start-page: 230
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0040
  article-title: SENTICOL collaborative group. Diagnostic value of intraoperative examination of sentinel lymph node in early cervical cancer: a prospective, multicenter study
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.08.010
– volume: 104
  start-page: 721
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0010
  article-title: Predictive value of HPV DNA in lymph nodes in surgically treated cervical carcinoma patients—a prospective study
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.10.018
– volume: 124
  start-page: 496
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0050
  article-title: Prognostic significance of low volume sentinel lymph node disease in early-stage cervical cancer
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.11.037
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1188
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0055
  article-title: Assessment of pelvic lymph node micrometastatic disease in stages IB and IIA of carcinoma of the uterine cervix
  publication-title: Int J Gynecol Cancer
  doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2006.00519.x
– volume: 116
  start-page: 28
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0060
  article-title: Sentinel node biopsy vs. pelvic lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer: Is it time to change the gold standard?
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.10.049
– volume: 115
  start-page: 46
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0020
  article-title: Sentinel node (SLN) biopsy in the management of locally advanced cervical cancer
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.06.017
– volume: 85
  start-page: 1547
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0025
  article-title: Incidence and distribution pattern of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with Stages IB, IIA, and IIB cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy
  publication-title: Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990401)85:7<1547::AID-CNCR16>3.0.CO;2-2
– volume: 125
  start-page: 303
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0045
  article-title: Sentinel lymph node status in patients with locally advanced cervical cancers and impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  publication-title: Gynecol Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.02.010
– volume: 11
  start-page: 445
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001_bb0015
  article-title: Laparoscopic sentinel node procedure for cervical cancer: impact of neodjuvant chemoradiotherapy
  publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol
  doi: 10.1245/ASO.2004.09.006
SSID ssj0003012
Score 2.3784618
Snippet Metastatic involvement of the sentinel nodes (SN) is one of the main prognostic factors in cervical cancer which determines the disease management. The results...
AbstractObjectivesMetastatic involvement of the sentinel nodes (SN) is one of the main prognostic factors in cervical cancer which determines the disease...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 384
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Carcinoma - pathology
Carcinoma - surgery
Cervical cancer
Cohort Studies
False Negative Reactions
Female
Frozen section
Frozen Sections
Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Hysterectomy
Intraoperative Care
Logistic Models
Lymph Node Excision
Lymphadenectomy
Lymphatic Metastasis
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Micrometastasis
Neoplasm Staging
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Pelvis
Sentinel lymph node
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery
Title High false negative rate of frozen section examination of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0090825813000723
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0090825813000723
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.001
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23395889
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1327725499
Volume 129
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
journalDatabaseRights – providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: Baden-Württemberg Complete Freedom Collection (Elsevier)
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1095-6859
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0003012
  issn: 0090-8258
  databaseCode: GBLVA
  dateStart: 20110101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
– providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: Elsevier SD Complete Freedom Collection [SCCMFC]
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1095-6859
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0003012
  issn: 0090-8258
  databaseCode: ACRLP
  dateStart: 19950101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
– providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: Elsevier SD Freedom Collection Journals [SCFCJ]
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1095-6859
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0003012
  issn: 0090-8258
  databaseCode: AIKHN
  dateStart: 19950101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
– providerCode: PRVESC
  databaseName: Science Direct
  customDbUrl:
  eissn: 1095-6859
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0003012
  issn: 0090-8258
  databaseCode: .~1
  dateStart: 19950101
  isFulltext: true
  titleUrlDefault: https://www.sciencedirect.com
  providerName: Elsevier
– providerCode: PRVLSH
  databaseName: Elsevier Journals
  customDbUrl:
  mediaType: online
  eissn: 1095-6859
  dateEnd: 99991231
  omitProxy: true
  ssIdentifier: ssj0003012
  issn: 0090-8258
  databaseCode: AKRWK
  dateStart: 19721101
  isFulltext: true
  providerName: Library Specific Holdings
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Na9wwEBUhhdJL6Xc3aYIKPdaNLEuydAyhYdslOZSG5iZsSQ5bFjmsN9DNIb89M7K9JbRJoScbW7JkazSasd68IeSD5MFX3NUZ6H5wUJxwWd0oljmmKjD3pZNpB__kVE3PxNdzeb5FjsZYGIRVDrq_1-lJWw9XDoaveXA5n2OML6brlho3ZFjJkfFTiBKzGHy6-Q3zAAHuGcNTyLTUI_NQwnitL9YRIwDzoifuzO9bne6zPtMqdPyMPB3MR3rY9_A52QrxBXl8MmyQvyQt4jZoAzIVaAwXidWbIhsEbRvaLNvrEGmX0FeRhl8V4mDSOdzFKCR4xoIu1jDCNLY-dHQe6cC82lH8ZUtd0i3QBYfisnxFzo4_fz-aZkNOhcwJpVZZYbzyCrNGgh_hSs515Z3XTLEiGO9z6QvZgBthjMhFHaAwqwodlC5D2Qjni9dkO7YxvCUUTAtW1hqWfGcEc6pmlVC503neCNOYZkL4-C2tGwjHMe_Fwo7Isp82DYDFAbCMI75uQj5uKl32fBsPFxfjINkxlBSUn4X14OFq5d-qhW6YwJ3NbQcl7R9CNiFqU_OOnP67yfejDFmYwbgtU8XQXkFTBQcXB_30CXnTC9fm1XlRGKm12fnfZnfJE54SeCBE8x3ZXi2vwh6YUat6P82TffLo8MtseorH2bcfs1vhch2F
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9QwELZKkYBLxZstLyNxJNTxK_YRVVQLdHtqpd6sxHaqRSun2mylbg_97R07ziIELRK3KPHEjj0ez2S-mUHoo6De1dQ2Bch-MFAst0XTSlJYImtQ94UVyYM_O5LTE_79VJxuof0xFibCKrPsH2R6ktb5zl6ezb3z-TzG-MZy3UJFhwypKLuH7nNBq2iBfb7-hfMADh5ShqeYaaHG1EMJ5LU-W4cYAliyIXNnedvxdJv6mY6hg8doJ-uP-MswxCdoy4en6MEse8ifoS4CN3ALTOVx8GcprTeO6SBw1-J22V35gPsEvwrYX9YRCJOu4WkMQ4J3LPBiDUuMQ-d8j-cB59SrPY7_bLFNwgWGYCO_LJ-jk4Ovx_vTIhdVKCyXclUw7aSTsWwkGBK2olTVzjpFJGFeO1cKx0QLdoTWvOSNh8akZspLVfmq5daxF2g7dMG_Qhh0C1I1Cs58qzmxsiE1l6VVZdly3ep2gug4l8bmjOOx8MXCjNCynyYtgIkLYAiNALsJ-rQhOh8SbtzdnI-LZMZYUpB-Bg6Eu8mqv5H5Pu_g3pSmh5bmDy6bILmh_I1R_93lh5GHDGzh6Jepg-8uoCsGXJsM9Ql6OTDX5tMpY1oopXf_t9v36OH0eHZoDr8d_XiNHtFUzSPiNd-g7dXywr8FnWrVvEt75gZeGx13
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=High+false+negative+rate+of+frozen+section+examination+of+sentinel+lymph+nodes+in+patients+with+cervical+cancer&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic+oncology&rft.au=Slama%2C+J&rft.au=Dundr%2C+P&rft.au=Dusek%2C+L&rft.au=Cibula%2C+D&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.issn=1095-6859&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=384&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ygyno.2013.02.001&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00908258%2FS0090825813X00046%2Fcov150h.gif