Comparison of initial learning algorithms for long short-term memory method on real-time respiratory signal prediction

This study aimed to examine the effect of the weight initializers on the respiratory signal prediction performance using the long short-term memory (LSTM) model. Respiratory signals collected with the CyberKnife Synchrony device during 304 breathing motion traces were used in this study. The effecti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in oncology Vol. 13; p. 1101225
Main Authors Sun, Wenzheng, Dang, Jun, Zhang, Lei, Wei, Qichun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 20.01.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2234-943X
2234-943X
DOI10.3389/fonc.2023.1101225

Cover

More Information
Summary:This study aimed to examine the effect of the weight initializers on the respiratory signal prediction performance using the long short-term memory (LSTM) model. Respiratory signals collected with the CyberKnife Synchrony device during 304 breathing motion traces were used in this study. The effectiveness of four weight initializers (Glorot, He, Orthogonal, and Narrow-normal) on the prediction performance of the LSTM model was investigated. The prediction performance was evaluated by the normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) between the ground truth and predicted respiratory signal. Among the four initializers, the He initializer showed the best performance. The mean NRMSE with 385-ms ahead time using the He initializer was superior by 7.5%, 8.3%, and 11.3% as compared to that using the Glorot, Orthogonal, and Narrow-normal initializer, respectively. The confidence interval of NRMSE using Glorot, He, Orthogonal, and Narrow-normal initializer were [0.099, 0.175], [0.097, 0.147], [0.101, 0.176], and [0.107, 0.178], respectively. The experiment results in this study indicated that He could be a valuable initializer in the LSTM model for the respiratory signal prediction.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Xiaokun Liang, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology (CAS), China; Ahmad Esmaili Torshabi, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Iran
This article was submitted to Radiation Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology
Edited by: Humberto Rocha, University of Coimbra, Portugal
ISSN:2234-943X
2234-943X
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2023.1101225