Demographics, Pattern of Care, and Outcome Analysis of Malignant Melanomas - Experience From a Tertiary Cancer Centre in India

Treatment of malignant melanoma has undergone a paradigm shift with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and targeted therapies. However, access to ICI is limited in low-middle income countries (LMICs). Histologically confirmed malignant melanoma cases registered from 2013 to 2019 were a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFrontiers in oncology Vol. 11; p. 710585
Main Authors Bajpai, Jyoti, Abraham, George, Saklani, Avanish P., Agarwal, Anshul, Das, Sashanka, Chatterjee, Ambarish, Kapoor, Akhil, Eaga, Prathyusha, Mondal, Pradip Kumar, Chandrasekharan, Arun, Bhargava, Prabhat Ghanshyam, Srinivas, Sujay, Turkar, Siddharth, Rekhi, Bharat, Khanna, Nehal, Janu, Amit Kumar, Bal, Munita, Ostwal, Vikas Sureshchand, Ramaswamy, Anant, Rohila, Jitender, Desouza, Ashwin L., Guha, Amrita, Kumar, Rajiv, Menon, Nandini Sharrel, Rath, Sushmita, Patil, Vijay Maruti, Noronha, Vanita Maria, Joshi, Amit Prakashchandra, Laskar, Siddhartha, Rangarajan, Venkatesh, Prabhash, Kumar, Gupta, Sudeep, Banavali, Shripad
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Switzerland Frontiers Media S.A 08.09.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2234-943X
2234-943X
DOI10.3389/fonc.2021.710585

Cover

More Information
Summary:Treatment of malignant melanoma has undergone a paradigm shift with the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and targeted therapies. However, access to ICI is limited in low-middle income countries (LMICs). Histologically confirmed malignant melanoma cases registered from 2013 to 2019 were analysed for pattern of care, safety, and efficacy of systemic therapies (ST). There were 659 patients with a median age of 53 (range 44-63) years; 58.9% were males; 55.2% were mucosal melanomas. Most common primary sites were extremities (36.6%) and anorectum (31.4%). Nearly 10.8% of the metastatic cohort were BRAF mutated. Among 368 non-metastatic patients (172 prior treated, 185 de novo, and 11 unresectable), with a median follow-up of 26 months (0-83 months), median EFS and OS were 29.5 (95% CI: 22-40) and 33.3 (95% CI: 29.5-41.2) months, respectively. In the metastatic cohort, with a median follow up of 24 (0-85) months, the median EFS for BSC was 3.1 (95% CI 1.9-4.8) months versus 3.98 (95% CI 3.2-4.7) months with any ST (HR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.52-0.92; P = 0.011). The median OS was 3.9 (95% CI 3.3-6.4) months for BSC alone versus 12.0 (95% CI 10.5-15.1) months in any ST (HR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.28-0.50; P < 0.001). The disease control rate was 51.55%. Commonest grade 3-4 toxicity was anemia with chemotherapy (9.5%) and ICI (8.8%). In multivariate analysis, any ST received had a better prognostic impact in the metastatic cohort. Large real-world data reflects the treatment patterns adopted in LMIC for melanomas and poor access to expensive, standard of care therapies. Other systemic therapies provide meaningful clinical benefit and are worth exploring especially when the standard therapies are challenging to administer.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Reviewed by: Pippa Corrie, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; Anju Kumari, National Cancer Institute, United States
Edited by: Bhawna Sirohi, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, India
This article was submitted to Skin Cancer, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology
ISSN:2234-943X
2234-943X
DOI:10.3389/fonc.2021.710585