How Deep Learning Solved My Seizure Detection Problems
Comparison of Different Input Modalities and Network Structures for Deep Learning-Based Seizure Detection Cho KO, Jang HJ. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1-11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56958-y The manual review of an electroencephalogram (EEG) for seizure detection is a laborious and error-prone process. Thus,...
Saved in:
Published in | Epilepsy currents Vol. 20; no. 5; pp. 306 - 308 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Los Angeles, CA
SAGE Publications
01.09.2020
Sage Publications Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1535-7597 1535-7511 |
DOI | 10.1177/1535759720948430 |
Cover
Summary: | Comparison of Different Input Modalities and Network Structures
for Deep Learning-Based Seizure Detection
Cho KO, Jang HJ. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1-11. doi:
10.1038/s41598-019-56958-y
The manual review of an electroencephalogram (EEG) for seizure detection
is a laborious and error-prone process. Thus, automated seizure
detection based on machine learning has been studied for decades.
Recently, deep learning has been adopted in order to avoid manual
feature extraction and selection. In the present study, we
systematically compared the performance of different combinations of
input modalities and network structures on a fixed window size and data
set to ascertain an optimal combination of input modalities and network
structures. The raw time series EEG, periodogram of the EEG,
2-dimensional [2D] images of short-time Fourier transform results, and
2D images of raw EEG waveforms were obtained from 5-second segments of
intracranial EEGs recorded from a mouse model of epilepsy. A fully
connected neural network (FCNN), recurrent neural network (RNN), and
convolutional neural network (CNN) were implemented to classify the
various inputs. The classification results for the test data set showed
that CNN performed better than FCNN and RNN, with the area under the
curve (AUC) for the receiver operating characteristics curves ranging
from 0.983 to 0.984, from 0.985 to 0.989, and from 0.989 to 0.993 for
FCNN, RNN, and CNN, respectively. As for input modalities, 2D images of
raw EEG waveforms yielded the best result with an AUC of 0.993. Thus,
CNN can be the most suitable network structure for automated seizure
detection when applied to the images of raw EEG waveforms, since CNN can
effectively learn a general spatially invariant representation of
seizure patterns in 2D representations of raw EEG. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Commentary-3 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 1535-7597 1535-7511 |
DOI: | 10.1177/1535759720948430 |