Progressive Device Failure at Long Term Follow Up of the Nellix EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) System

• Published in: European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery Vol. 61; no. 2; pp. 211 - 218
• Main Authors: Singh, Aminder A., Benaragama, Kapila S., Pope, Tasneem, Coughlin, Patrick A., Winterbottom, Andrew P., Harrison, Seamus C., Boyle, Jonathan R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Elsevier B.V 01.02.2021
• Subjects: Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Vessel Prosthesis; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation - instrumentation; Endograft; Endovascular Procedures - instrumentation; EVAS; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Foreign-Body Migration - diagnosis; Foreign-Body Migration - epidemiology; Foreign-Body Migration - therapy; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing; Prosthesis Failure; Retrospective Studies; Stent graft; Stents; Surgery; Stent graft; EVAS; Endograft; Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Nellix endovascular aneurysm sealing
• ISSN: 1078-5884; 1532-2165; 1532-2165
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.11.004

High rates of midterm failure of the Nellix EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) System resulted in device withdrawal from the UK market. The study aim was to report long term Nellix EVAS outcomes and management of a failing device. A retrospective review of EVAS procedures at a tertiary unit was performed. Device failure was defined as a triad of stent migration, stent separation, and secondary sac expansion, or any intervention for type 1 endoleak, device rupture, or explant. 161 (male n = 140, female n = 21) patients with a median follow up of 6.0 (IQR 5.0–6.6) years were included. Freedom from all cause mortality estimate at six years was 41.5%. There were 70 (43.5%) device failures with a freedom from device failure estimate at six years of 32.3%. Failure was the result of sac expansion (n = 41), caudal stent migration (n = 36), stent separation (n = 26), and secondary AAA rupture (n = 15). A substantial number of type 1 endoleaks was present (1a n = 33, 1b n = 11), but the type 2 endoleak rate was low at 3.7%. Some 36 (22.4%) patients required re-intervention. Twenty-one patients underwent explant with no 30 day deaths. Six patients underwent Nellix-in-Nellix application (NINA) with one early death from bowel ischaemia and one patient who died later from non-aneurysm related cause. Two NINA patients have ongoing sac expansion and two have had thrombosis of a Nellix limb or visceral stent. Proximal embolisation was only successful in one of six cases. The long term failure rate of Nellix EVAS is high. All patients with a device must be informed and be enrolled in enhanced surveillance. EVAS explant is an acceptable technique with favourable outcomes. Management by open explant, if the patient is fit, should be considered early and offered to those with device failure.