Dense Breast Legislation in the United States: State of the States

Limitations of screening mammography in patients with dense breasts combined with the significant increased risk for breast cancer have made the issue of dense breasts a matter of great concern in recent years, leading to advocacy for policy change and legislation. Dense breast notification legislat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American College of Radiology Vol. 10; no. 12; pp. 899 - 902
Main Authors Dehkordy, Soudabeh Fazeli, Carlos, Ruth C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.12.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1546-1440
1558-349X
1558-349X
DOI10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007

Cover

Abstract Limitations of screening mammography in patients with dense breasts combined with the significant increased risk for breast cancer have made the issue of dense breasts a matter of great concern in recent years, leading to advocacy for policy change and legislation. Dense breast notification legislation requires direct patient notification of mammographic results indicating the presence of dense breast tissue. The aim of this study was to summarize the state of dense breast notification legislation across the country. The general intent of dense breast notification legislation is to increase awareness of dense breasts and encourage patients to discuss the clinical issues with their physicians. It was first enacted in Connecticut in 2009, and since then, 27 other states have passed, rejected, or considered dense breast notification legislation. At the federal level, a bill was introduced in October 2011, but it was not enacted. There are significant differences in the language of the laws from state to state that complicate implementation. Furthermore, legislated recommendations for possible additional testing are often unaccompanied by legal provisions for insurance coverage, which potentially results in unequal access.
AbstractList Limitations of screening mammography in patients with dense breasts combined with the significant increased risk for breast cancer have made the issue of dense breasts a matter of great concern in recent years, leading to advocacy for policy change and legislation. Dense breast notification legislation requires direct patient notification of mammographic results indicating the presence of dense breast tissue. The aim of this study was to summarize the state of dense breast notification legislation across the country. The general intent of dense breast notification legislation is to increase awareness of dense breasts and encourage patients to discuss the clinical issues with their physicians. It was first enacted in Connecticut in 2009, and since then, 27 other states have passed, rejected, or considered dense breast notification legislation. At the federal level, a bill was introduced in October 2011, but it was not enacted. There are significant differences in the language of the laws from state to state that complicate implementation. Furthermore, legislated recommendations for possible additional testing are often unaccompanied by legal provisions for insurance coverage, which potentially results in unequal access.
Limitations of screening mammography in patients with dense breasts combined with the significant increased risk for breast cancer have made the issue of dense breasts a matter of great concern in recent years, leading to advocacy for policy change and legislation. Dense breast notification legislation requires direct patient notification of mammographic results indicating the presence of dense breast tissue. The aim of this study was to summarize the state of dense breast notification legislation across the country. The general intent of dense breast notification legislation is to increase awareness of dense breasts and encourage patients to discuss the clinical issues with their physicians. It was first enacted in Connecticut in 2009, and since then, 27 other states have passed, rejected, or considered dense breast notification legislation. At the federal level, a bill was introduced in October 2011, but it was not enacted. There are significant differences in the language of the laws from state to state that complicate implementation. Furthermore, legislated recommendations for possible additional testing are often unaccompanied by legal provisions for insurance coverage, which potentially results in unequal access.
Limitations of screening mammography in patients with dense breasts combined with the significant increased risk for breast cancer have made the issue of dense breasts a matter of great concern in recent years, leading to advocacy for policy change and legislation. Dense breast notification legislation requires direct patient notification of mammographic results indicating the presence of dense breast tissue. The aim of this study was to summarize the state of dense breast notification legislation across the country. The general intent of dense breast notification legislation is to increase awareness of dense breasts and encourage patients to discuss the clinical issues with their physicians. It was first enacted in Connecticut in 2009, and since then, 27 other states have passed, rejected, or considered dense breast notification legislation. At the federal level, a bill was introduced in October 2011, but it was not enacted. There are significant differences in the language of the laws from state to state that complicate implementation. Furthermore, legislated recommendations for possible additional testing are often unaccompanied by legal provisions for insurance coverage, which potentially results in unequal access.Limitations of screening mammography in patients with dense breasts combined with the significant increased risk for breast cancer have made the issue of dense breasts a matter of great concern in recent years, leading to advocacy for policy change and legislation. Dense breast notification legislation requires direct patient notification of mammographic results indicating the presence of dense breast tissue. The aim of this study was to summarize the state of dense breast notification legislation across the country. The general intent of dense breast notification legislation is to increase awareness of dense breasts and encourage patients to discuss the clinical issues with their physicians. It was first enacted in Connecticut in 2009, and since then, 27 other states have passed, rejected, or considered dense breast notification legislation. At the federal level, a bill was introduced in October 2011, but it was not enacted. There are significant differences in the language of the laws from state to state that complicate implementation. Furthermore, legislated recommendations for possible additional testing are often unaccompanied by legal provisions for insurance coverage, which potentially results in unequal access.
Author Carlos, Ruth C.
Dehkordy, Soudabeh Fazeli
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Soudabeh Fazeli
  surname: Dehkordy
  fullname: Dehkordy, Soudabeh Fazeli
  organization: Department of Radiology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Ruth C.
  surname: Carlos
  fullname: Carlos, Ruth C.
  email: rcarlos@umich.edu
  organization: Department of Radiology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24295937$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkUtv1TAQhS1URB_wB1igLNncMHacxK4QEi1P6UosSiV2I8eegEOu09q-SP33JE27qURZzWh8zrHmm2N2EKZAjL3kUHLgzZuhHIyNpQBelaBLgPYJO-J1rTaV1D8Oll42Gy4lHLLjlAYA0bZKPWOHQgpd66o9YmcfKCQqziKZlIst_fRpNNlPofChyL-ouAw-kysussmUTtdaTP3t2zp8zp72Zkz04q6esMtPH7-ff9lsv33-ev5-u7GyEXkjpXDOqE46W-lOOzDCtqqvlQRtiXMA0qIn6pw2Ta1VY3mrLbS16JyqZVWdsNdr7lWcrveUMu58sjSOJtC0T8hlI5XmjdCz9NWddN_tyOFV9DsTb_B-71mgVoGNU0qRerQ-3-6do_EjcsAFMQ64IMYFMYLGGfFsFQ-s9-mPmt6uJpoB_fEUMVlPwZLzkWxGN_nH7e8e2O3og7dm_E03lIZpH8OMHjkmgYAXy-GXu_MKoG4bmANO_x3wv9__Atl7u2k
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000005279
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2015_02_011
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2016_09_002
crossref_primary_10_4103_njbcs_njbcs_38_17
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_75167_6
crossref_primary_10_1093_ajcn_nqaa316
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_32731
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2014_05_005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2020_11_012
crossref_primary_10_1177_1077558717751941
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_17_18158
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2018_08_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2021_01_027
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinimag_2015_01_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2014_09_042
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2023_44850
crossref_primary_10_37549_AR2108
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_breast_2018_09_001
crossref_primary_10_35509_01239015_94
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2016_12_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_breastdis_2014_07_042
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamainternmed_2018_8372
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_15_15367
crossref_primary_10_7326_M14_0692
crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_29275
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinimag_2019_01_019
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_whi_2023_03_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2014_11_001
crossref_primary_10_1053_j_seminoncol_2017_02_004
crossref_primary_10_1097_MLR_0000000000000967
crossref_primary_10_1177_2150131916633138
crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_34768
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2013_09_008
crossref_primary_10_1097_GRF_0000000000000192
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_14_13558
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2014_06_048
crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_33198
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mcna_2017_03_005
Cites_doi 10.2214/ajr.126.6.1130
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034
10.1038/sj.bjc.6604635
10.1007/s12282-008-0082-8
10.1001/jama.2012.388
10.1148/radiol.2442060461
10.1056/NEJMoa062790
10.1007/s11547-006-0040-5
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2013 American College of Radiology
American College of Radiology
Copyright © 2013 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2013 American College of Radiology
– notice: American College of Radiology
– notice: Copyright © 2013 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE


MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1558-349X
EndPage 902
ExternalDocumentID 24295937
10_1016_j_jacr_2013_09_007
S1546144013005760
1_s2_0_S1546144013005760
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID --K
.1-
.FO
0R~
1B1
1P~
4.4
457
53G
5GY
5VS
6PF
AAEDT
AAEDW
AALRI
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAWTL
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABMAC
ABWVN
ACGFS
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADVLN
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AGCQF
AIGII
AITUG
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
APXCP
BELOY
CS3
EBS
EFKBS
EJD
EO8
F5P
FDB
G-Q
HX~
HZ~
IHE
J1W
M41
NQ-
O9-
OI~
OU0
P2P
ROL
RPZ
SES
SEW
XH2
Z5R
ADPAM
AFCTW
RIG
AAIAV
AGZHU
ALXNB
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-442dda8b4dc39b9d0a2c78f58409ce1100e92feebd9a65986c179c0752bd85433
ISSN 1546-1440
1558-349X
IngestDate Thu Sep 04 21:03:56 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:14:36 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:54:25 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:58:22 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:25:57 EST 2024
Sun Feb 23 10:19:17 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 20:03:42 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 12
Keywords screening
patient communication
Dense breast
mammography
legislation
Language English
License https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
Copyright © 2013 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c462t-442dda8b4dc39b9d0a2c78f58409ce1100e92feebd9a65986c179c0752bd85433
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 24295937
PQID 1464891629
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 4
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1464891629
pubmed_primary_24295937
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_jacr_2013_09_007
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2013_09_007
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jacr_2013_09_007
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S1546144013005760
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_jacr_2013_09_007
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2013-12-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2013
  text: 2013-12-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of the American College of Radiology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Am Coll Radiol
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Accessed June 18, 2013.
Lehman, Isaacs, Schnall (bib12) 2007; 244
Berg, Zhang, Lehrer (bib11) 2012; 307
House Resolution 3102: Breast Density and Mammography Reporting Act of 2011. Available at
Tohno, Ueno, Watanabe (bib10) 2009; 16
Boyd, Guo, Martin (bib3) 2007; 356
US Food and Drug Administration. Mammography Quality Standards Act. Available at
American College of Radiology. ACR statement on reporting breast density in mammography reports and patient summaries. Available at
Ginsburg, Martin, Boyd (bib4) 2008; 99
McCormack, dos Santos Silva (bib2) 2006; 15
Corsetti, Ferrari, Ghirardi (bib9) 2006; 111
Wolfe (bib1) 1976; 126
Legal Information Institute. Home page. Available at
10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib8
Corsetti (10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib9) 2006; 111
Tohno (10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib10) 2009; 16
10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib5
10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib6
Lehman (10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib12) 2007; 244
McCormack (10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib2) 2006; 15
10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib7
Boyd (10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib3) 2007; 356
Ginsburg (10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib4) 2008; 99
Wolfe (10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib1) 1976; 126
Berg (10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib11) 2012; 307
References_xml – volume: 99
  start-page: 1369
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1374
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Mammographic density, lobular involution, and risk of breast cancer
  publication-title: Br J Cancer
– volume: 244
  start-page: 381
  year: 2007
  end-page: 388
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study
  publication-title: Radiology
– reference: US Food and Drug Administration. Mammography Quality Standards Act. Available at:
– reference: American College of Radiology. ACR statement on reporting breast density in mammography reports and patient summaries. Available at:
– volume: 356
  start-page: 227
  year: 2007
  end-page: 236
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
– volume: 126
  start-page: 1130
  year: 1976
  end-page: 1137
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
– reference: House Resolution 3102: Breast Density and Mammography Reporting Act of 2011. Available at:
– reference: . Accessed June 18, 2013.
– volume: 307
  start-page: 1394
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1404
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk
  publication-title: JAMA
– reference: Legal Information Institute. Home page. Available at:
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1159
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1169
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
– volume: 16
  start-page: 18
  year: 2009
  end-page: 22
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Ultrasound screening of breast cancer
  publication-title: Breast Cancer
– volume: 111
  start-page: 440
  year: 2006
  end-page: 448
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammography occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts
  publication-title: Radiol Med (Torino)
– volume: 126
  start-page: 1130
  year: 1976
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib1
  article-title: Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer
  publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.126.6.1130
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1159
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib2
  article-title: Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev
  doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034
– volume: 99
  start-page: 1369
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib4
  article-title: Mammographic density, lobular involution, and risk of breast cancer
  publication-title: Br J Cancer
  doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604635
– ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib5
– volume: 16
  start-page: 18
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib10
  article-title: Ultrasound screening of breast cancer
  publication-title: Breast Cancer
  doi: 10.1007/s12282-008-0082-8
– volume: 307
  start-page: 1394
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib11
  article-title: Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.388
– ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib7
– ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib6
– volume: 244
  start-page: 381
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib12
  article-title: Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study
  publication-title: Radiology
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2442060461
– volume: 356
  start-page: 227
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib3
  article-title: Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062790
– ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib8
– volume: 111
  start-page: 440
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib9
  article-title: Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammography occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts
  publication-title: Radiol Med (Torino)
  doi: 10.1007/s11547-006-0040-5
SSID ssj0027788
Score 2.1705205
Snippet Limitations of screening mammography in patients with dense breasts combined with the significant increased risk for breast cancer have made the issue of dense...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 899
SubjectTerms Absorptiometry, Photon
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control
Dense breast
Disclosure - legislation & jurisprudence
Early Detection of Cancer
Female
Humans
legislation
Male
Mammography
Mass Screening - legislation & jurisprudence
Patient Access to Records - legislation & jurisprudence
patient communication
Physician's Role
Radiology
Radiology - standards
screening
United States
Title Dense Breast Legislation in the United States: State of the States
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S1546144013005760
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S1546144013005760
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24295937
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1464891629
Volume 10
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELdQJyFeEN-ULxmJtypV4jgf5m1sTBMDHvYh9mY5trO1VAla2pf99dzFTpaOdTBe0tSt3Sb3y_nO_t0dIR-wIqFRKQ9KgSXMrAA9aCwIJGUsy4QJy7JlW3xP90_4l9PkdBBxjdEly2KqL2-MK_kfqUIbyBWjZO8g2X5QaIBzkC8cQcJw_CcZ74IPitv7WH9n8tWezRrHbOvIi2sGJfr-7VlHC3DNG6zTQcRJNVxdOFRmtrYSv2vPf9Z-9_-oXhlV2PPJnrq0i9nV_sbFwrH5kE8_2ZkOlxqieEDb8NqRpwHuBq-pz3AIEzZQhrkrfeTnVdFGVv-pst3qwXw6Vxrzs0Zxm3fWlcJdz499bd7q2YQdUW0ucQyJY8hQyDbJwBbLwKYaka3tg8MfB1eueNZWJO0vyIdTOebf9X-yyWTZ5JK0psnxI_LQS41uO4A8Jvds9YTc_-ZZE0_JpxYn1OGEDnBCZxUFQVOHE-oA8dG90rpsP3ONz8jJ3ufjnf3A184INE_ZMuCcGaPyghsdiwKeOcV0lpcJ-vPaYp5AK1hpbWGESjFHvwbNrMF-ZIXJEx7Hz8moqiv7klAdZ6C2ORi6JeNJafLUhEJFsdWFUSY0YxJ1t0dqn1ge65ss5GbBjMmk7_PLpVW59dtxd9dlFzAMU5wECN3aK7upl238E9zISDZMhvIIYYAowK1d8L_DMUn6nt4QdQbmX3_xfQcJCVoat95UZetVgw42z8ETY2JMXjis9NcNRjJmB89e3emevCYP4B1zrMU3ZLS8WNm3YB8vi3ce7L8B64e22w
linkProvider Library Specific Holdings
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dense+Breast+Legislation+in+the+United+States%3A+State+of+the+States&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+the+American+College+of+Radiology&rft.au=Dehkordy%2C+Soudabeh+Fazeli&rft.au=Carlos%2C+Ruth+C.&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.issn=1546-1440&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=899&rft.epage=902&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jacr.2013.09.007&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_jacr_2013_09_007
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F15461440%2FS1546144013X00110%2Fcov150h.gif