Dense Breast Legislation in the United States: State of the States
Limitations of screening mammography in patients with dense breasts combined with the significant increased risk for breast cancer have made the issue of dense breasts a matter of great concern in recent years, leading to advocacy for policy change and legislation. Dense breast notification legislat...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of the American College of Radiology Vol. 10; no. 12; pp. 899 - 902 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.12.2013
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1546-1440 1558-349X 1558-349X |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007 |
Cover
Abstract | Limitations of screening mammography in patients with dense breasts combined with the significant increased risk for breast cancer have made the issue of dense breasts a matter of great concern in recent years, leading to advocacy for policy change and legislation. Dense breast notification legislation requires direct patient notification of mammographic results indicating the presence of dense breast tissue. The aim of this study was to summarize the state of dense breast notification legislation across the country. The general intent of dense breast notification legislation is to increase awareness of dense breasts and encourage patients to discuss the clinical issues with their physicians. It was first enacted in Connecticut in 2009, and since then, 27 other states have passed, rejected, or considered dense breast notification legislation. At the federal level, a bill was introduced in October 2011, but it was not enacted. There are significant differences in the language of the laws from state to state that complicate implementation. Furthermore, legislated recommendations for possible additional testing are often unaccompanied by legal provisions for insurance coverage, which potentially results in unequal access. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Limitations of screening mammography in patients with dense breasts combined with the significant increased risk for breast cancer have made the issue of dense breasts a matter of great concern in recent years, leading to advocacy for policy change and legislation. Dense breast notification legislation requires direct patient notification of mammographic results indicating the presence of dense breast tissue. The aim of this study was to summarize the state of dense breast notification legislation across the country. The general intent of dense breast notification legislation is to increase awareness of dense breasts and encourage patients to discuss the clinical issues with their physicians. It was first enacted in Connecticut in 2009, and since then, 27 other states have passed, rejected, or considered dense breast notification legislation. At the federal level, a bill was introduced in October 2011, but it was not enacted. There are significant differences in the language of the laws from state to state that complicate implementation. Furthermore, legislated recommendations for possible additional testing are often unaccompanied by legal provisions for insurance coverage, which potentially results in unequal access. Limitations of screening mammography in patients with dense breasts combined with the significant increased risk for breast cancer have made the issue of dense breasts a matter of great concern in recent years, leading to advocacy for policy change and legislation. Dense breast notification legislation requires direct patient notification of mammographic results indicating the presence of dense breast tissue. The aim of this study was to summarize the state of dense breast notification legislation across the country. The general intent of dense breast notification legislation is to increase awareness of dense breasts and encourage patients to discuss the clinical issues with their physicians. It was first enacted in Connecticut in 2009, and since then, 27 other states have passed, rejected, or considered dense breast notification legislation. At the federal level, a bill was introduced in October 2011, but it was not enacted. There are significant differences in the language of the laws from state to state that complicate implementation. Furthermore, legislated recommendations for possible additional testing are often unaccompanied by legal provisions for insurance coverage, which potentially results in unequal access. Limitations of screening mammography in patients with dense breasts combined with the significant increased risk for breast cancer have made the issue of dense breasts a matter of great concern in recent years, leading to advocacy for policy change and legislation. Dense breast notification legislation requires direct patient notification of mammographic results indicating the presence of dense breast tissue. The aim of this study was to summarize the state of dense breast notification legislation across the country. The general intent of dense breast notification legislation is to increase awareness of dense breasts and encourage patients to discuss the clinical issues with their physicians. It was first enacted in Connecticut in 2009, and since then, 27 other states have passed, rejected, or considered dense breast notification legislation. At the federal level, a bill was introduced in October 2011, but it was not enacted. There are significant differences in the language of the laws from state to state that complicate implementation. Furthermore, legislated recommendations for possible additional testing are often unaccompanied by legal provisions for insurance coverage, which potentially results in unequal access.Limitations of screening mammography in patients with dense breasts combined with the significant increased risk for breast cancer have made the issue of dense breasts a matter of great concern in recent years, leading to advocacy for policy change and legislation. Dense breast notification legislation requires direct patient notification of mammographic results indicating the presence of dense breast tissue. The aim of this study was to summarize the state of dense breast notification legislation across the country. The general intent of dense breast notification legislation is to increase awareness of dense breasts and encourage patients to discuss the clinical issues with their physicians. It was first enacted in Connecticut in 2009, and since then, 27 other states have passed, rejected, or considered dense breast notification legislation. At the federal level, a bill was introduced in October 2011, but it was not enacted. There are significant differences in the language of the laws from state to state that complicate implementation. Furthermore, legislated recommendations for possible additional testing are often unaccompanied by legal provisions for insurance coverage, which potentially results in unequal access. |
Author | Carlos, Ruth C. Dehkordy, Soudabeh Fazeli |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Soudabeh Fazeli surname: Dehkordy fullname: Dehkordy, Soudabeh Fazeli organization: Department of Radiology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan – sequence: 2 givenname: Ruth C. surname: Carlos fullname: Carlos, Ruth C. email: rcarlos@umich.edu organization: Department of Radiology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24295937$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkUtv1TAQhS1URB_wB1igLNncMHacxK4QEi1P6UosSiV2I8eegEOu09q-SP33JE27qURZzWh8zrHmm2N2EKZAjL3kUHLgzZuhHIyNpQBelaBLgPYJO-J1rTaV1D8Oll42Gy4lHLLjlAYA0bZKPWOHQgpd66o9YmcfKCQqziKZlIst_fRpNNlPofChyL-ouAw-kysussmUTtdaTP3t2zp8zp72Zkz04q6esMtPH7-ff9lsv33-ev5-u7GyEXkjpXDOqE46W-lOOzDCtqqvlQRtiXMA0qIn6pw2Ta1VY3mrLbS16JyqZVWdsNdr7lWcrveUMu58sjSOJtC0T8hlI5XmjdCz9NWddN_tyOFV9DsTb_B-71mgVoGNU0qRerQ-3-6do_EjcsAFMQ64IMYFMYLGGfFsFQ-s9-mPmt6uJpoB_fEUMVlPwZLzkWxGN_nH7e8e2O3og7dm_E03lIZpH8OMHjkmgYAXy-GXu_MKoG4bmANO_x3wv9__Atl7u2k |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000005279 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2015_02_011 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2016_09_002 crossref_primary_10_4103_njbcs_njbcs_38_17 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_75167_6 crossref_primary_10_1093_ajcn_nqaa316 crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_32731 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2014_05_005 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2020_11_012 crossref_primary_10_1177_1077558717751941 crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_17_18158 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2018_08_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2021_01_027 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinimag_2015_01_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2014_09_042 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2023_44850 crossref_primary_10_37549_AR2108 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_breast_2018_09_001 crossref_primary_10_35509_01239015_94 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2016_12_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_breastdis_2014_07_042 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamainternmed_2018_8372 crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_15_15367 crossref_primary_10_7326_M14_0692 crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_29275 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinimag_2019_01_019 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_whi_2023_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2014_11_001 crossref_primary_10_1053_j_seminoncol_2017_02_004 crossref_primary_10_1097_MLR_0000000000000967 crossref_primary_10_1177_2150131916633138 crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_34768 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2013_09_008 crossref_primary_10_1097_GRF_0000000000000192 crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_14_13558 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2014_06_048 crossref_primary_10_1002_cncr_33198 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mcna_2017_03_005 |
Cites_doi | 10.2214/ajr.126.6.1130 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604635 10.1007/s12282-008-0082-8 10.1001/jama.2012.388 10.1148/radiol.2442060461 10.1056/NEJMoa062790 10.1007/s11547-006-0040-5 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2013 American College of Radiology American College of Radiology Copyright © 2013 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2013 American College of Radiology – notice: American College of Radiology – notice: Copyright © 2013 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1558-349X |
EndPage | 902 |
ExternalDocumentID | 24295937 10_1016_j_jacr_2013_09_007 S1546144013005760 1_s2_0_S1546144013005760 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --K .1- .FO 0R~ 1B1 1P~ 4.4 457 53G 5GY 5VS 6PF AAEDT AAEDW AALRI AAQFI AAQQT AAWTL AAXUO AAYWO ABJNI ABLJU ABMAC ABWVN ACGFS ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADMUD ADNMO ADVLN AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AGCQF AIGII AITUG AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ APXCP BELOY CS3 EBS EFKBS EJD EO8 F5P FDB G-Q HX~ HZ~ IHE J1W M41 NQ- O9- OI~ OU0 P2P ROL RPZ SES SEW XH2 Z5R ADPAM AFCTW RIG AAIAV AGZHU ALXNB AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-442dda8b4dc39b9d0a2c78f58409ce1100e92feebd9a65986c179c0752bd85433 |
ISSN | 1546-1440 1558-349X |
IngestDate | Thu Sep 04 21:03:56 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:14:36 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:54:25 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:58:22 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:25:57 EST 2024 Sun Feb 23 10:19:17 EST 2025 Tue Aug 26 20:03:42 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 12 |
Keywords | screening patient communication Dense breast mammography legislation |
Language | English |
License | https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 Copyright © 2013 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c462t-442dda8b4dc39b9d0a2c78f58409ce1100e92feebd9a65986c179c0752bd85433 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
PMID | 24295937 |
PQID | 1464891629 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 4 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1464891629 pubmed_primary_24295937 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_jacr_2013_09_007 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2013_09_007 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_jacr_2013_09_007 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S1546144013005760 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_jacr_2013_09_007 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2013-12-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-12-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2013 text: 2013-12-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Journal of the American College of Radiology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Am Coll Radiol |
PublicationYear | 2013 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
References | Accessed June 18, 2013. Lehman, Isaacs, Schnall (bib12) 2007; 244 Berg, Zhang, Lehrer (bib11) 2012; 307 House Resolution 3102: Breast Density and Mammography Reporting Act of 2011. Available at Tohno, Ueno, Watanabe (bib10) 2009; 16 Boyd, Guo, Martin (bib3) 2007; 356 US Food and Drug Administration. Mammography Quality Standards Act. Available at American College of Radiology. ACR statement on reporting breast density in mammography reports and patient summaries. Available at Ginsburg, Martin, Boyd (bib4) 2008; 99 McCormack, dos Santos Silva (bib2) 2006; 15 Corsetti, Ferrari, Ghirardi (bib9) 2006; 111 Wolfe (bib1) 1976; 126 Legal Information Institute. Home page. Available at 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib8 Corsetti (10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib9) 2006; 111 Tohno (10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib10) 2009; 16 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib5 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib6 Lehman (10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib12) 2007; 244 McCormack (10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib2) 2006; 15 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib7 Boyd (10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib3) 2007; 356 Ginsburg (10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib4) 2008; 99 Wolfe (10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib1) 1976; 126 Berg (10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib11) 2012; 307 |
References_xml | – volume: 99 start-page: 1369 year: 2008 end-page: 1374 ident: bib4 article-title: Mammographic density, lobular involution, and risk of breast cancer publication-title: Br J Cancer – volume: 244 start-page: 381 year: 2007 end-page: 388 ident: bib12 article-title: Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study publication-title: Radiology – reference: US Food and Drug Administration. Mammography Quality Standards Act. Available at: – reference: American College of Radiology. ACR statement on reporting breast density in mammography reports and patient summaries. Available at: – volume: 356 start-page: 227 year: 2007 end-page: 236 ident: bib3 article-title: Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer publication-title: N Engl J Med – volume: 126 start-page: 1130 year: 1976 end-page: 1137 ident: bib1 article-title: Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol – reference: House Resolution 3102: Breast Density and Mammography Reporting Act of 2011. Available at: – reference: . Accessed June 18, 2013. – volume: 307 start-page: 1394 year: 2012 end-page: 1404 ident: bib11 article-title: Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk publication-title: JAMA – reference: Legal Information Institute. Home page. Available at: – volume: 15 start-page: 1159 year: 2006 end-page: 1169 ident: bib2 article-title: Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev – volume: 16 start-page: 18 year: 2009 end-page: 22 ident: bib10 article-title: Ultrasound screening of breast cancer publication-title: Breast Cancer – volume: 111 start-page: 440 year: 2006 end-page: 448 ident: bib9 article-title: Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammography occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts publication-title: Radiol Med (Torino) – volume: 126 start-page: 1130 year: 1976 ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib1 article-title: Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol doi: 10.2214/ajr.126.6.1130 – volume: 15 start-page: 1159 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib2 article-title: Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0034 – volume: 99 start-page: 1369 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib4 article-title: Mammographic density, lobular involution, and risk of breast cancer publication-title: Br J Cancer doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604635 – ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib5 – volume: 16 start-page: 18 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib10 article-title: Ultrasound screening of breast cancer publication-title: Breast Cancer doi: 10.1007/s12282-008-0082-8 – volume: 307 start-page: 1394 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib11 article-title: Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.388 – ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib7 – ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib6 – volume: 244 start-page: 381 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib12 article-title: Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study publication-title: Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiol.2442060461 – volume: 356 start-page: 227 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib3 article-title: Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062790 – ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib8 – volume: 111 start-page: 440 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007_bib9 article-title: Role of ultrasonography in detecting mammography occult breast carcinoma in women with dense breasts publication-title: Radiol Med (Torino) doi: 10.1007/s11547-006-0040-5 |
SSID | ssj0027788 |
Score | 2.1705205 |
Snippet | Limitations of screening mammography in patients with dense breasts combined with the significant increased risk for breast cancer have made the issue of dense... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 899 |
SubjectTerms | Absorptiometry, Photon Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Breast Neoplasms - prevention & control Dense breast Disclosure - legislation & jurisprudence Early Detection of Cancer Female Humans legislation Male Mammography Mass Screening - legislation & jurisprudence Patient Access to Records - legislation & jurisprudence patient communication Physician's Role Radiology Radiology - standards screening United States |
Title | Dense Breast Legislation in the United States: State of the States |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S1546144013005760 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S1546144013005760 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2013.09.007 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24295937 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1464891629 |
Volume | 10 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELdQJyFeEN-ULxmJtypV4jgf5m1sTBMDHvYh9mY5trO1VAla2pf99dzFTpaOdTBe0tSt3Sb3y_nO_t0dIR-wIqFRKQ9KgSXMrAA9aCwIJGUsy4QJy7JlW3xP90_4l9PkdBBxjdEly2KqL2-MK_kfqUIbyBWjZO8g2X5QaIBzkC8cQcJw_CcZ74IPitv7WH9n8tWezRrHbOvIi2sGJfr-7VlHC3DNG6zTQcRJNVxdOFRmtrYSv2vPf9Z-9_-oXhlV2PPJnrq0i9nV_sbFwrH5kE8_2ZkOlxqieEDb8NqRpwHuBq-pz3AIEzZQhrkrfeTnVdFGVv-pst3qwXw6Vxrzs0Zxm3fWlcJdz499bd7q2YQdUW0ucQyJY8hQyDbJwBbLwKYaka3tg8MfB1eueNZWJO0vyIdTOebf9X-yyWTZ5JK0psnxI_LQS41uO4A8Jvds9YTc_-ZZE0_JpxYn1OGEDnBCZxUFQVOHE-oA8dG90rpsP3ONz8jJ3ufjnf3A184INE_ZMuCcGaPyghsdiwKeOcV0lpcJ-vPaYp5AK1hpbWGESjFHvwbNrMF-ZIXJEx7Hz8moqiv7klAdZ6C2ORi6JeNJafLUhEJFsdWFUSY0YxJ1t0dqn1ge65ss5GbBjMmk7_PLpVW59dtxd9dlFzAMU5wECN3aK7upl238E9zISDZMhvIIYYAowK1d8L_DMUn6nt4QdQbmX3_xfQcJCVoat95UZetVgw42z8ETY2JMXjis9NcNRjJmB89e3emevCYP4B1zrMU3ZLS8WNm3YB8vi3ce7L8B64e22w |
linkProvider | Library Specific Holdings |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dense+Breast+Legislation+in+the+United+States%3A+State+of+the+States&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+the+American+College+of+Radiology&rft.au=Dehkordy%2C+Soudabeh+Fazeli&rft.au=Carlos%2C+Ruth+C.&rft.date=2013-12-01&rft.issn=1546-1440&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=899&rft.epage=902&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.jacr.2013.09.007&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_jacr_2013_09_007 |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F15461440%2FS1546144013X00110%2Fcov150h.gif |