Design and Development of a Fully Synthetic Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification–Based Probe Mix for Detection of Copy Number Alterations in Prostate Cancer Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Samples

DNA copy number alterations (CNAs) are promising biomarkers to predict prostate cancer (PCa) outcome. However, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) cannot assess complex CNA signatures because of low multiplexing capabilities. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) can detect m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD Vol. 22; no. 10; pp. 1246 - 1263
Main Authors Ebrahimizadeh, Walead, Guérard, Karl-Philippe, Rouzbeh, Shaghayegh, Bramhecha, Yogesh M., Scarlata, Eleonora, Brimo, Fadi, Patel, Palak G., Jamaspishvili, Tamara, Aprikian, Armen G., Berman, David, Bartlett, John M.S., Chevalier, Simone, Lapointe, Jacques
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.10.2020
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1525-1578
1943-7811
1943-7811
DOI10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.07.003

Cover

More Information
Summary:DNA copy number alterations (CNAs) are promising biomarkers to predict prostate cancer (PCa) outcome. However, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) cannot assess complex CNA signatures because of low multiplexing capabilities. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) can detect multiple CNAs in a single PCR assay, but PCa-specific probe mixes available commercially are lacking. Synthetic MLPA probes were designed to target 10 CNAs relevant to PCa: 5q15-21.1 (CHD1), 6q15 (MAP3K7), 8p21.2 (NKX3-1), 8q24.21 (MYC), 10q23.31 (PTEN), 12p13.1 (CDKN1B), 13q14.2 (RB1), 16p13.3 (PDPK1), 16q23.1 (GABARAPL2), and 17p13.1 (TP53), with 9 control probes. In cell lines, CNAs were detected when the cancer genome was as low as 30%. Compared with FISH in radical prostatectomy formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples (n = 18: 15 cancers and 3 matched benign), the MLPA assay showed median sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 93%, respectively, across all CNAs assessed. In the validation set (n = 40: 20 tumors sampled in two areas), the respective sensitivity and specificity of MLPA compared advantageously with FISH and TaqMan droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) when assessing PTEN deletion (FISH: 85% and 100%; ddPCR: 100% and 83%) and PDPK1 gain (FISH: 100% and 92%; ddPCR: 93% and 100%). This new PCa probe mix accurately identifies CNAs by MLPA across multiple genes using low quality and quantities (50 ng) of DNA extracted from clinical formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1525-1578
1943-7811
1943-7811
DOI:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.07.003